be heard till the end of the week. alsow some follow-up to the big summit, so we hope you will be joining us all week. we will give you a big preview of that tomorrow and the big fight that is emerging. let not your heart be tled, standing by in washington, d.c., takesaway. laura ingraham.yo >> laura: hannity, nice job. you don't look fatigued at all, you look like you've been going out for runs and mixed martial arts. >> sean: i'm still doing my mixed martial arts. in out.ht my bands and i'm s a pool right behind me, we are on the roof of the building. >> laura: you are sticking to your exercise regimen, good for you. good interview, and i'm jealousl >> a >> sean: i can't even get home until the end of the week.

>> laura: want to get home safely, we miss you here in the united states. good evening washington, i'm laura ingraham end of this is "the ingraham angle." from trump spring, i can singapore sensation to big news that we are breaking here tonight. tonight we will break down how trump baffled the experts going from the brink of war to a stunning diplomatic tryout. we will also show you hilarious momentsf the summity that mav gotten past you. raymond arroyo will break it alw down for us. plus exclusively on the angle, mark meadows and jim jordan are here to break some major news on the doj document production. and what may be coming for for rob rosenstein. but first, pride, bitterness and the refusal to give peace a chance that's a focus of tonight's

angle.e.ft remember when i left was all about love, peace and understanding? ♪ all we are saying, is give peace a chance ♪ >> laura: you're a remember those concerts on the early 80s and late 70s, it was an awesome time. well, the left thought we should stop being so deliberate stomach belligerent with the soviet union, we should engage with the soviets for a better world. some even admired the castro's in cuba and they fiddled with marxist ideology here at home. so one would have thought that some of those same people and their ideological offspring would view president trump summit as a moment to savor, a real chance at creating a more

peaceful planet. but no. and you know why? because the man doing the average in negotiating is journalist donald j. trump. his critics and both parties kept revealing themselves. their narratives, if you noticed, kept shifting. six months ago, it was this. >> the lack of a diplomatic and serious engagement strategy in my view has us sliding toward a war by next summer. >> trump's comment about nuclear weapons have experts worry that catastrophe.esertently trigger a >> reckless behavior could launch the nation on a path to world war iii. >> laura: if you are all wrong. everyone of you, i don't have enough time to list you all. but you were all along.

but the pure any of being wronged by experts is nothing new. they were wrong about the economy of donald trump, the pro-life commitment of donald trump and of the trade policies of donald trump, just to name a few. so naturally is the summit began, the error caucus offered this transient analysis.an >> as a former businessman, and he likes absolute control. >> is he a want to be desperate? >> i have conceded that for years now. >> it's interesting because the more we are talking about north korea, the less we talk about russia. >> this is not just a meeting about policy, this is their message, that all they got. >> laura: wait a second, that's all that god? so the woman whoy' brought us to win a campaign of john mccain

in 2008? okay. so i guess record low unemployment, a thriving economy, tax cuts, destruction of isis and now a foreign policd with administration is all they've got. even kim brought and squeezed his commitments, the left still will not give him a shred of credit. >> donald trump the real estate developer, he doesn't realize that this dictator doesn't want beach condos. he wants nuclear weapons. >> potentially empty words and lots of flags and ceremonies. and i find that incredibly

worrying and incredibly depressing. speak out there is no knowledge of history, it's staggering every day to realize h unself-aware and, the lack of >> laura: the lack of knowledge [laughs] i don't recall most of thesemedg embracing dictators. oh, and he gave hundreds of millions of dollars to the dictators of iran for a bogus denuclearization deal. or when he held the state dinner for the chinese dictator. the selective moral outrage here is, predictable and oh so blatant., when trump talks tough, they say he has a warmonger, taking us right to war. but when he gets bad guys to sit at the negotiating table and t begin to hammer out a piece framework, he savaged for embracing a dictator.

so which is it? they bang him up for saying that he trusts kim, but trump h said, listen carefully, he could be wrong. >> i think -- even with the high stakes hig, high stakes involved here, really serious and possibly deadly consequences of failure. president trump makes geopolitics fun again. >>ta i may stand before you in x months and say, i was wrong. i don't know that i will ever admit that, butfi i will find se kind of excuse. >> even some of the doubters had to laugh a little bit. have some fun, it's a great time to be in america. who else could have gotten us to this point? >> president trump: he said it openly, and to a couple of reporters that were with him that he knows that no other

president could have done this. >> laura: so he's got a big ego, what president doesn't? it's in his past better than the alternative that the elites were warning us about six months? aa north korea that is so isolated that it might think to do the unthinkable, and hit an american city with an icbm? i say, let them distract us all they like, let them keep going and flapping their lips about this. let them contradict their own analyses. while their audience and the readerships shrin and they tune them out, more americans are seeing through and trump at home and abroad is undeterred by their static. he's too busy winning. that's the angle. joining me now for reaction in washington ishristian wyden, a former state department senior advisor in both the

george w. bush and donald trump administration, and the examiner"'s byron york, also a fox news. can. byron, i remember seeing you with those big lighters at jackson browne, for 79 rfk stadium . >> i tried to destroy those w pictures. >> laura:e i blurt you out. but it is wild. we have to lower the temperature with the soviet union. they w didn't like reagan's touh talk against the soviets and they didn't like bush's evilvi empire. but now we have a guy -- and we will see how it goes but this an amazing first that he willth never, ever, ever get an ounce of credit for, and i think he shouldn't expect at this point. >> he should not. you play play the sound bites him reacting, back he was talking like wasy talk tough tough, and what they haven't

recognized is that kind of provocative talk leadd to thein summit. s the present even talked about that in the hannity interview. he said in the past they were too silent, and he said sometimes he felt a little foolish going over the top of some of this stuff. but he wanted to get to a place where he and the north koreans feltle they had to talk. i really did believe we did sanctions and all of the things we did.th but i think without the rhetoric, other administrations, i don't want to get specific on that. but they had a policy of silence. if they said something very bads frightening and horrible, just don't answer. that's notr the answer, that's not what you have to do. i think the rhetoric, i hated to do it and sometimes i felt foolish doingd it, but we had no choice.

>> laura: christian, to hear him admit that he roughed up the old diplomatic playbook, and he decided to do it a totally different way, and all of the elites, they have all their pedigrees, their educational pedigrees, trump comes in there and says, this can't be that hard. this guy has to want something from us. what could we give him, what could we give up that won't be detrimentalo. interests in the end? we will see how it goes. >> so many think they arer telling diplomacy, and that reagan got heat for that saying the soviet empire was an evil empire and calling for gorbachev to tear down, and they all said, you can't say that. that truth can actually play an important fool in the embassy. >> laura: cnn had an

interesting analysis. >> there would be a call for impeachment and it would be the worst thing in the world if a democratic president not just sat down but gave all of the pomp and circumstance, the diplomatic bells and whistles that president trump gave, not justst rhetorically but the flau placed on equal footing to the american flag, things like that. >> laura: byron? >> i just don't buy that. president obama open up relations with cuba and he was not impeached. i think there is another thing in the rhetoric that we need to remember, which is the rhetori with actually backed up with an incredible threat of force.au and it was unthinkable. and they were going through military options and they had to have kim jong un believed that they were considering those military options. >> wasn't that important

christian, in the end to come up for this president to make it clear that he wasn't bound by the old way of doing things. and that this is what i i call angle, a lot of it was about pride. being shown up by a guy that thought, he was so unsophisticated, he's not as educated as he was. and he has a street-smart sense, and i read him pretty fast. and it was wild, its products to this point and it's far superior to the alternative. >> he's brought common sense to

the equation, if the person w is selling it to you, no zero, you can't take no for an answer and you will buy no matter what. and and that's the key difference between the set of negotiations in the other negotiations that failed >> the few democrats, but chuck schumer today was not impressed on the senate floor. they are not giving him a g mom moment. and, that was that he saw that north korea was an intractable problem. presidents of both parties have not been able to figure this out and they have the amazing idea that perhaps he should try

something different. it doesn't mean it's going to work, and there are lots of questions after this and we don't know that kim is going to do what he wants to do. it's ver clear, but with th problem, you had to try something new. it's a stunning development. everyone is throwing a wetis blanket on it. it's cauously optimistic but it's better than the alternative and, they said he would do the opposite, the so-called expert class.le let's get some insight with u someone from a unique perspective. jim wellesley was the cia directorh , and it's great to se you. what might be different this time, given everything you've witnessed over the last seven or eight months. what about the approach? u

they put north koreans at under pressure in a way that they did not remotely expect. he sort of played good cop, bad cop, and then he has taken both roles. sometimes he's a good cop and he is saying friendly and laudatory things about kim jong un, and other times he is talking about fire and fury and so forth. keeps that off-balance, and that's his style of negotiating which i'm must admit did not initially attract me, but a lot of people who were not initiallc attracted and seeing at work, they were kind of scratching their heads and saying, maybe he was wrong on this and he was right. >> laura: he had m concerns about a month and a half ago in

april, about what he viewed the president to be in terms of being provocative. let's watch. >> the words from the administration are creating an even higher volume in terms of the publications that are going on. i think we hav be car here. we shouldn't engage in any precipitous action. there is a reason that no u.s. president in recent history has pulled the trigger on north korea. >> laura: that was in april of 2017, just to be clear. it's a year after, plus a month or so, month and a half. and here we are. the beginning of a framework that was reconfirmed and another brief message that came out a few hours ago, they are to doing this. what are the pitfalls of this administration going forward, the ability to obviously do inspections and so forth, how do

we verify? >> verification is tough on undertakings like this. we could probably do it if we had the right kind of corporation from kim jong un and his people. because they have sideswiped the effort serious inspections before the north koreans had to. the iranians were extraordinarily duplicitous and stirring everybody away from anything that was interesting to look at and under their agreement that was signed happily, then taken apart by president trump. i think the one situation i am most concerned about, not because i'm worried about it, but because it's important, is china. the cooperative china will work this out. but with china that believesve

that they have to stand up to us in the south china sea, or what. we could stumble, but so far, i have to say that, my wife has a prognostication that president trump was going to a geted and b, turn into that, and she was right and i was wrong. >> laura: all women love to thank you so much for your thoughts. in the wake ofay'ssu summit, trunk critics oourse will not give the president a break. >> we have this debate this morning. as american exceptionalism dead in the era ofonald trump? >> oh, my gosh, a history lesson for chuck and many other critics, next. recommended remfresh.

your nightly sleep companion. available in the natural sleep section at walmart.

>> laura: some say democrats are in full-blown denial over the singapore summit. they are refusing to see that president trump did something actually kind of good. potentially it's a historic breakthrough with north korea. >> but the united states has gained is vague and unverifiable atat best. wee legitimized a brutal dictator who has starved his own people. >> i have to be honest with you, this is the weakest statement i've ever seen coming out of any engagement with north korea. >> laura: baba, it's called, the beginning of the process of peace. just look at reagan and china to my i remember seeing the car

pull up and it was unbelievable. they held for summits during ragan's a second term. so let's get some big picture wisconsin, great to have all of you on the panel. richard, your take on this? they are worried that the guy that they said was going to blow up the world was actually going to perhaps save the korean peninsula. >> i think every democrat worth theirr salt gives the president credit for trying to do thing. the problem they have is not for trying, it's for what he has done. he has basically got a nothing burger of a deal, something that korean leaders have agreed to for decades. and he's cold again he's called

him, a very talented. and funny and trustworthy. the problem is, that hurts theun u.s. around the world, when the present can't observe and callou what somebody ends. that the problem. hundreds of thousands of people andse reeducation camps in chin. do you know what they do to the churches? they rip babies out of their wombs. we have them for a state dinner and i did hear wall street, goldman >> so i don't know why you were in that field. but republicans, whether it was nixon or ford et cetera, they were kind of trying to deal with obama as well.

the problem is, we are suspending our military exercises, something that kim and hisather and grandmother all so barack obama goes to cuba and has a baseball game with raul castro, a ruthless dictator. not only that he sends billions of dollars in cash to the iranian mullah's, and can get that money back. donald trump as you mentied, this is a first of nine innings. this isof the first four, and by the way democrats from donald trump said, my button is bigger than yours. while he's a warmonger and all of a sudden he has a peace summit. >> craig, you are a reagan biographer extraordinary and anyone who has to understand

reagan is going to read your book. i believe it was on msnbc, and she was talking about the reagan comparison. let's watch. >> reagan did exactly the opposite of what we are were talking about with trump. he was able to find a way to negotiate with the soviets to be extremely tough with the soviets and also toe a line, and a that is bad. so trump -- >> she is exactly wrong because both trump talked tough and then engage the enemy. ronald reagan talked tough about sylvia and then engage the enemy. that's what you understood, to get up and dealing from a position of strength, but that doesn't mean don't talk it. two of them were basicallymm pho

ops, and reagan actually melt with human rights distance there. then ofw course in washington where they signed an agreement to limit intermediate rangeve nuclear missiles. but sometimes you just have to talk in order to reach an agreement. >> laura: a lot of people craig and sean and richard were upset that the president did spend more time on human rights. let's watch what the president said to sean hannity about this. >> sean: did humanitarian issues come up in the meeting?of >> president trump: yes it did. in one of the things that i am most happy about, and as you know is a big sticking point is bringing back the remains of thousands of soldiers that were killed. >> sean: came up las minute? >> president trump: this was sort of last-minute, yes. i get letters from families all the time that lost a father or son or brother in korea, it was

a rough fight. > the president said in anotr interview talking about human rights abuses, he said there are human rights abuses and other rosss, or she was reminiscent of what he said about pruden. why can't he call out? i'm not saying it should supersede as a next extensional issue, and if he can solve it, kudos if he does. although what he did to western alliance to undo that, i think that will hurt his nobel prize application. >> human rights are important, but first things first. at the nuclear threat to the world ispl incredibly dangerous. >> how many people would die if they got hit by a long range nuclearea missile? hundreds of thousands. >> the second issue is human rights. no one ever complai about

that. so i think, let's take this off the table and deal with bigger issues. >> craig, you can't do everything at once, although it's tempting. and trump is very impatient for change. ich say this all the time and i mean that in a good way. but if you have to give someone a way out, even if it is a horrible person, you have to ve them away like going back to his own people, saying, he wasn't completely humiliated there. >> don't you find it ironic that the left is berating donald trump for using manners in singapore? that's screamingly hilarious to me. when reagan gave his speech at the berlin wall, a kind of started with the thought, none of the three networks lead with it. and it only became important in the context of history because

three weeks later, the berlin wall did fall. it may not be historically important in the long run but it depends on what happens now as you see that days, wee and months ahead. if north korea d nuclear rises, if trade has opened up, if a new era of that opens up. >> laura: just a moment, mark meadows and jim jordan are upon their effort to make thes doj turn over documents to congress. and we will bring you the funniest, yes funniest, moments of the summit with raymond arroyo. stay right there. allergic to taltz.

before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase fections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms, or received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious lergic reactions can occur. ready for a chance at 100% clear skin? ask your doctor about taltz.

a next-generation, all-in-one work table and clamping system. ordinary work tables can't compete. pegasus has integrated clamps that hold materials tight at any angle. steel reinforcement makes pegasus superstrong. to prove it, we had pegasus support a car.

sets up in seconds and folds flat for easy storage. strong. versatile. portable. a workspace anyplace. the worx pegasus. >> laura: a stunning report from fox news' catherine herridge tonight. documentation showing that rob

rosenstein threaten to subpoena emails, phone records and other documents belonging to the members of the house intel committee. attorney general jeff sessions came to rosenstein's defense earlier tonight. >> i'm confident that deputy rosensin, 28 years on the department of justice did not improperly threaten anyone on that occasion. but we do believe that we have maderogress in months, asth him the months have gone by and have had some good relationships with members of congress. >> laura: with the war between the doj and congress heating up, they join to make a major announcement on the oversight committee and goal. what do you think about what you just heard? >> i'm flabbergasted. rob rosensteinn't compliedie

with the devon nunez subpoena, we caught them hidingun information rejecting the fact that peter strzok was friends wine of the court judges. we learned in katherine's report that in essence, the head of the justice department, rob rotein, was threatening members of the house intelligence committee doing their job and trying to get answers from people. the attorney general says, that's okay, we are doing just ve. fine. when you have the head of the justice department, rob rosenstein, saying he's going to go after staff members. >> laura: he wants your blackberry. congress in meadows, what i think he is saying is that if you guys to hold them in contempt, and he's going to have to defend himself. part of the defensee will be, e wants discovery. he wants to know who you have

been talking to, i mean, maybe they won't redact your documents like they did. >> there is two problems. one is they are a separate branch of. govert and they don't have the right to unless they are coming under some kind of criminal investigation. he attorney general to say he is confident that rob rosenstein did everything right, well, i'm here to tell you, i'm uith it. i have a resolution, we will can plan to file that tomorrow, but, is that all about compelling tho doj, and they have nothing to hide, so turn over the docum documents. this is inexcusable. >> so haven't you already been -- >> we subpoenaed them

already. >> so what are your resolutions? it's one thing for us to say, it's another for the chairman subpoena and us to another if the house of representatives would go on record and say mr. rosenstein, we has the majority house, you are not giving us the information you need. and frankly now that we've found that you were, threatening, he's going to defend himself against you threatening to call them into contempt.e how does he defend himself? >> tomorrow night, let's let rob rosenstein come home wit i. and they would rather do private press releases to spend the narrative at midnight, and we have had a document out since november 3rd of last year asking for documents. we still don't have it. we have less than 60% of those

documents. >> is this draft that you have, will it call for his removal? what if they don't release it? >> while they have been doing that a along. so if they do that again, you at leas have the house spoken and you can say, i will have thista information. then the same issues are still on the table. but, it's like look. a let's have the house take a vote and send the message that the majority of the house agrees with us. >> lra: are we talking impeachment? >> that something we have in ouo toolbox, but i'm here to tell youight, tell your viewers, we will have a vote on the house floor. we will have a vote and we will make sure we get those document documents. >> how about extortion when you are threatening members of a standing committee and the house of representatives were doing

their job? and there are the guys -- infa e pfizer court who paid for the dossier, they didn't tell the pfizer court that christopher steele had been fired by the fbi for leaking information. this is as wrong as it gets. >> laura: what is your general thought on the constitutionalit constitutionality, there were generally a lot of scholars who believed in dershowitz and a bunch of us have been talking about this for a month.ci this entire special counsel seems like an unconstitutional undertaking. it seems like they have a limit. and the president can't remove themre, and as a witness? >> i can tell you on some of the

facts that we have seen, he should recuse himself. that aside, in this country you investigate crimes. you hope to come up with a crime after you've investigated it, and that's not the way the special counsel is doing it and' i think it's wrong. >> didn't he say he was going to make those documents available to the so-called gang of eight? >> they said tomorrow, but they always end up not doing it. >> they said today, now it will be thursday. >> we had discussions with td g. i think -- the facts are on our side, how long is long enough? and i'm saying, today is longs enough. >> justice delayed is justice denied. thanks for coming on. at least the doj is doing something encouraging.

we will tell you the new rules that will stop illegal immigrants from gaming the asylum system. it's about time, that's next. nt. we were hit from behind. i called usaa and the first thing they asked was 'are you ok?' they always thank you for your service, which is nice because as a spouse you serve too. we're the hayles and we're usaa members for life. see how much you could save with usaa by bundling your auto and home insurance. get a quote today.

copd makes it hard to breathe. so to breathe better, i go with anoro. ♪ go your own way copd tries to say, "go this way." i say, "i'll go my own way, with anoro." ♪ go your own way once-daily anoro contains two medicines called bronchodilators that work together to significantly improve lung function all day and all night.

anoro is not for asthma. it contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. the risk is unknown in copd. anoro won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition, high blood pressure, glaucoma, prostate, bladder, or urinary problems. these may worsen with anoro. call your doctor if you have worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or while taking an. ask your doctor about anoro. ♪ go your own way get your first prescription free at anoro.com. >> laura: attorney general jeff sessions is making sure asylum-seekers are escaping persecution. sessions announced a new doj policy that requires immigrants seeking asylum to prove that they are not just plain crime or

gang violence. let's evade this crucial change, and former immigration judge art arthur, the center for immigration study. let's go to allen, first. i know a lot of people are waving their arms, like oh, my gosh, this is a persecuted people and they won't get any b relief now, they will be shut out of our system. but i think what he is referencing is an 872% increase in applications for asylum since 2009 in the united states. that is a massive increase with not a correlating fact pattern that would indicate that we have that many more thousands of people who have legitimate claims. >> i think the number should affect due process and justice, right? so that's not how we handle do justice. so what the session has done, he basically has undone 20 years of

president law, and i'm happy to here with art today because he's one of the outliers that basically so that's a good decision whereas 16 others say this is the wrong decision. for the new reasons we've enumerated, each case is a case-by-case judgment. what it doesn't do it is clear s the backlog, i just sent a message to the officers at the port of entry to say, please start denying these claims for persecution. >> laura: all right. >> in 2005, congress made it clear that in order to be granted access, you have to have legitimate reasons for the fear that you feel. >> laura: okay, let's go through that again. >> it has to be at least one central reason for the harm that you fear, it has to be one of the five characteristics for

asylum. in this particular instance, itp membership in a particular social group and at that particular social group in the attoey general sensation warrior people were fearing crime in their home country. >> laura: that's not what use traditionally think of, and you are the expert here. but when you think about persecution, having a horrible husband who is beating him up, that seems like right down like a regular crime. >> unfortunately, that membership at a particular social group is completely amorphous. there have been many years of law and that law was actually applied properly by jeff sessions, two individuals who wouldin fear crime in their home country. quite frankly, they don't have an asylum here, they have a crime fear and a the whole couny needs to address that. >> laura: another question,

the other thing i hadn't heard of before is the defense use of asylum claims. when people are about to be deported, sometimes, or oftentimes, they thenay, wait a second, i have a asylum claim. now it's defensively against those governments in all situations. and numbers don't matter but it's sometimes some some empirical truth, some information from a very smart lawyer to make this kind of claim while you are only under u.s. immigration law? >> they might have heard things from people across the way but many of them are handling their cases on their own it's talking about their experience. if you are a battered female or woman or a mother with your kids and you are having an intense conversation with the officer about what her level is, she also had the opportunity to

discuss how many times they were beaten and struck. what sessions has done is, he has removed the whole case by case analysis and said, look. i don't know if anyone coming here is a private actor but that's not persecution. what wsay is, it's the any action, the government is allowing this to happen and they also participate in a system. >> laura: i stunned. and i disagree with that when you talk about this. the attorney general is not completely closing the door to these claims but what he is saying is the claims need to be assessed anyway that the other particular social groups do. >> laura: how do you assess when a person comes from guatemala and says, my brother beat me up or something, you can't get records all

easily there. >>me you have to rely upon the statements in order to establish the claim. >> and the information we know about the countries. >> laura: we will have back, love both of you. by the way they were making news in singapore. stay right there and we will share them in just a moment.

>> laura: high-stakes drama, we had some laughs and even some giggle giggles, and that was the case in singapore. from the president's candid quips to a reporter making a fool of himself. here to share the entertaining size is a raymond arroyo. all right, raymond, comments about physical appearance? >> the president gets up and

they are taking photographs, and he says this to kim jong un, wa closely. >> can we get a picture of everybody? so we can look nice and young?ful and handsome and >> [laughter] he looks thrilled. >> did he say this to justin trudeau? look at . itas been an example of trump, very gently throughout this entire back and forth dominating kim jong un. he did it in the handshake, the way he embraced him, and there you see it again. >> laura: there was a lot of combo about the luncheon menu. >> i'm delighted to see that c has a culinary accessibility.

>> so by releasing the details of the o menu will, this is agan legitimizing kim jong un. >> the poor north korean people, if they knew what was being dished out there, they can't even imagine the types of food that you have rolled off of your tongue. because it is a poor country, and because of kim jong un himself and his family again, but you are right. beef short ribs and fried rice, soy bed codfish. that sounds really yummy and very expensive. >> laura: [laughs] what are they supposed ser at the summit? >> ramen noodles and pf chang frozen dinners. >> how did this turn into a parts unknown segment? >> don't let me get get me wro. i like how don leman takes his glasses off, like -- oh, my god,

there's quail eggs on the menu. body language. >> the body language expert, used to be one right here.ng cnn them out. he has a position of power, the person who is on the left of the picture will always be seen as . so when they are shaking hands, it takes 13 seconds to do that handshake, and he will then grab it and do an upper arm grab over here on kim jong un. >> now i want to point out on the left side of the screen and i more dominant, so i will give you the arm. o >> what does doing on the left or right have to do withce dominance? this isic ridiculous. i get that you grab them and control someone's arm, but why does -- how does the left suddenly become a more powerful tion.

>> laura: stayed there, because of robert de niro -- well, find out when we come bac back. hi! aren't you hot? it's fine.gain? i saw something the other day. myeczemaexposed.com. your eczema could be something called atopic dermatitis, which can be caused by inflammation under your skin. maybe you should ask your doctor? go to myeczemaexposed.com to learn more.

>> i have to say one thing. leap trump leap trump. it's no longer.

>> now he's apologizing to justin trudeau. that's all the time we have. shannon bream takes things from here.e fo ere.e fo >> thank you so much. we begin tonight with a fox news alert. brand-new comments from the president on north korea answering his critics over the deal with kim jong un we would hear from sen. john barrasso who just got off the phone with the president following the historic summit plus an exclusive from chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge. the dop and house gop clash of the claims deputy attorney general rod rosenstein threatened house investigators and new tonight and mccabe's attorney is suing the doj. also it is