left, we will be covering right here from singapore tomorrow. all the ig information thatg comes out, let not your heart be -- we have of mark levin, and others tomorrow. here is laura with the latest. >> launnity, getting your mail forwarded to singapore? are you ever coming home? what is this, you can't get hom home? >> sean: you really want to know the answer? >> laura: not really, but go ahead.n: >> sean: not really. it's a 22-hour flight. i have a three-hour radio show and a one-hour tv show and i'm not missing the ag report after 18 months. i won't be not on the air. >> laura: why didn't you get on the plane after you interviewed trump and then come back? >> sean: because the timing of such and doing the show after that made itsible. >> laura: we need you back in the country. on't seem right.

>> sean: most people are glad i'm out of the country. >> that's true. great show as always, and we will see you tomorrow night. good evening from washington, ia am laura ingraham and this is "the ingraham angle." incredible lineup of guests, rudy giuliani, alan dershowitz, dershowitz, jason chaffetz ands more on the eve of the release of the ig probe of the clinton probe, there are reports that it could hold devastating news for jim comey and andrew mccabe. so our experts will be settingco the table for all of you. secretary of state mike pompeo is expected to speak at any moment from south korea. so while the north korean media is saying kim jong un could visit the united states soon. u can we believe that? plus in "seen and unseen" raymond arroyo will show us the unbelievable lengths that one democrat is going to to make a point about guns. wait until you see this video.

it's unbelievable. and what do you think god looks like?'sha resident trumpkereturns to washs stunning success in singapore. member, before the president departed for the summit, america got some of its most incredible economic news since probably i worked for the reagan administration. so now the president is basking in his glow of his historic diplomatic triumph, and he should.ri the mueller probe is still going on, and the president continuese to rack up his successes. and i think americans are beginning to really notice, and so is washington. even mueller friendly reicans are growing tired of the endless probe. >> let's get this process moving forward and get it wrapped up and concluded, because it seems to me that this thing is sort of in a never ending episode. ould like to see it getting wrapped up, of course. i'd like to see this thing come to its conclusion.

is it a witch hunt? >> i think it's becoming a witch hunt. >> if, or is? >> if they have facts about collusion, and that's what this is supposed to be about. >> laura: well, the public seems to be growing weary of this, too. that is for mueller has had an all-time low, despite the media's constant cheerleading for the russia probe, a record 6% of all registered voters now view mueller as unfavorable. and, that includes right by the way a record 53% of republicans on an enormous job of 26 points over the last year. so people have been paying attention to the story, folks. predictably, the left is not ready to give up on their beloved witch hunts. >> trump tries to create all these distractions and bob mueller is building a case that i think it's up to very high levels. >> the law enforcement and other guys at the department of

justice and fbi including trump appointees including attorney general's and fbi directors say this investigation is so significant, we should continue. >> laura: >> even democratic voters are losing some faith and molar -- he is now viewed unfavorably up mueller. by a record 24% of democrats and a record 33% of independents. president trump is writing higher than ever before in support for the mueller is sliding. imagine if the press was actually fair about this. f so here's the question. is the time right for the president to voluntarily submit to an interview with mueller to get this thing wrapped up? who better to answer that question then the president's lawyer himself. rudy giuliani, how are you.wy the president looks great and singapore, no doubt about it. he came back in a great mood.

however, of course, right when he comes back, a few hours go by and the news about michael: perhaps cooperating with authorities, what's your reaction? >> i checked into this, and we are very comfortable if he cooperates, and, including the things that rosenstein said to president trump himself, that he is not involved in that investigation. my concern is that the m -- mueller investigation is going on interminably, and i think it is reflected in public inion. public opinion is discussed, i bet he's wasted $20 million. maybe he should put in an interim report and tell us what he's got on collusion. obstruction of justice, the

president can fire anybody he wants for any reason he wants. they can't even inquire about that. i don't know what he's got left. he's harassing michael cohen, and the paul manafort case seems to be falling apart. you take that out and, second, o now this ridiculous witness tampering, i can't even figure it out. second, you have the russians. they are all in russia, and it's a phony indictment. they were harassing hilary rallies dressed up like clowns, we had worse than that. >> laura: have you asked the special's counsel's office why they haven't brought certain people in for questioning? i mean if they were going to focus on this trump tower meeting, as we know, that's part

of the focused. why wouldn't they bring in the russian attorney that makes this big pitch, it's close to putin. the president can't be indicted, the sitting president can't be indicted, no one disputes that. and he's not. so he gets to write the report. maybe, rosenstein may have to write the report. just to get itr with. he's gotten 1.4 million documents, 32 witnesses, we raised no executive, and he's got the material from which to except the report would say no evidence in collusion. >> he wants to get in the state of mind. it's the state of mind question. >> i think he -- he can't do that until he gets the president across the table.

he's not getting the president on any type of obstruction of justice questioning. >> it's not going to happen. his whole theory is cockamamie. i can interpret, plus an article to immunity, and i think he did it for a corrupt reason. so i'm going to recommend that he did something wrong. plus his main witness there is comey. and i don't know about the horowitz report in detail, but i think it will be a tough one, it's 500 pages. >> laura: and the president has seen it? >> tomorrow at three or four, he gets an unedited version of it, without all the excising that they do because i think that's w juicuff will be. but, at a minimum, we know we e criticizing him heavily for his first hillary press conference and his second hillary press conference.

>> laura:en so that goes toward the credibility of how he handled the russian -- in your he starts the responsibility, mind. >> and he became the attorney general. he is the director of the fbi, and the chief detective decided whether to prosecute that. he wrote the report two months before. i asked mueller when we met wh him if he would do that for us. how about writthe report now? he said, that would be an improper investigation. >> when do you determined the issue of written answers? >> we are addressing that now with the president. we are all working on that, is -- >> laura: is there dispute among you about how to proceed? i mean that's healthy. know he sho testifuneverything we wan you know hts to testify. 's complaint is, i did nothing wrong and i can stand up to any questioning.

what he doesn't is how pernicious they are. >> laura: but they are really good lawyers. >> theputable and unethical lawyers. what about the ones that have been cited for unethical violations?s do you think i'm going to trust him with the president of the united states? >>king about who would do theng? are you getting into that level >> i think it should be mueller. when i -- ken was an appellate of detail? lawyer, i was a trial lawyer. and he was a trial lawyer so it's his reputation at stake. >> laura: are you guys worried that there are any tape recordings that michael cohen might have in his possession of conversations with the consent or about the president, that either he could have exaggerated things to other people to like curry favor or look like he's bigger than he is? i'm not saying he did that. but you guys don't know, you have some of the documents but

not all the documents that was turned over to the southern district of new york, that they seized. so you are looking at them for privileged. >> i've known him for 30 years, and he's a tough businessman. just like he's done nothing wrong in this thing, he was clean as a whistle. he might have been tough, might been difficult on situations, but he was a man of his word. and michael cohen, i think he he has nothing being and >> laura: you are a former prosecutor, they threatened to bankrupt you and its high bills, they pe up real fast. you go years. >> the reality is they are trying to frighten him. michael is a tough guy, i don't think that will happen. and if he does, but don't think he's going to lie.

swalwell, a frequent critic on that said this. >> innocent people don't worry about whether someone will flip on them, and let's be honest, presidents don't have fixers. i think we are so in the think of this that we take a step back and we realize that every day, talk a cohen who is donald trump's fixer. innocent people don't need fixers. innocent people fix things by shooting straight and telling the truth, so i think this is the beginning of a dark, dark storm. >> fixer mean someone who can get things done, people hirere them in new york, they are called expediters. >> laura: they don't know new york lingo. >> michael said it, i was a fixer. >> what he meant by that was, i expedited things, i got them

done. not illegally. no one has esaid anything about that untow.re thisa that a pre is perly innocent has done these guys haven't been cited for turning over exculpatory evidence about innocent people. i've been a lawyer a long time, that kid doesn't know what he's talking about. on>> laura: are you going to make an argument about the underlying constitutionality of the special counsel in this process? >> both on his face and as applied to. because on its face, the statute itself, and second, the fact that it was produced by what might have been a totally illegal counterintelligencet investigation that they tried to make into a criminal investigation. and clearly by the comey memo, we have to see what horowitz

like professor calibri said, that memo could blow the whole thing up. >> laura: kellyanne conway's husband, george, i've known him for many years. he's brilliant, we thought he might be sg at the justice department, he would have made a great one. he has written an article for the hill that he basically says, this argument about the unconstitutionality of the statute, he just smashes calabrese's argument. he buys into the appointments clause out argument here, and he just destroys that. is there any concern about that at the white house? >> no concern about it. >> laura: we don't have to agree on everything here. [laughs]ay >> methods clear of an argument as let's say their ability to indict, or even their ability to subpoena, as it is true in article two. t >> laura: have you written a brief on that? >> more or less. however, i would think, maybe he

-- it's an undecided question, so how can conway decide? maybe heants him on the supreme court, but i don't think you will get the appointment. b >> laura: i w like, george e -- >> george is not getting on the supreme court, i can pick predict that. 1 i'm not as big of a fan of prosecutors at some conservatives are. because with unchecked powcomesm patrick fitzgerald, there are like four people. >> representative comey. >> laura: yes, scooter libby, all the rest of it. so when someone like the scws turned on him, you will lose your family, be in jail for ten years, what are you going to

give you are going to tell us. people freak out and that's with the power of prosecutors do. >> i empathize greatly with michael, i don't believe he will tell a falsehood, i believe he's going to tell the truth and we are very comfortable with it. the president is comfortable with that, he's known him for years. >> laura: but what if he is in trouble on another matter? >> he will deal with it. him until they show me trust in something, to the contrary. >> laura: reports are that he is upset because -- he's feeling all alone out there. >> i bet it feels that way, too. but we advise the president that that would be misundood. >> laura: now, you can't pick up the phone. >> you tell your client over time, don't talk to this person. paul manafort was probably totally innocent but they turned it into another charge, because the first charges going under.

>> laura: when is your best guess that this thing will be decided without the testimony? because that's it. everything you hear from muelle mueller, they've interviewed pretty much. everyone they wanted. c >> i believe we ecide unless something goes wrong. without a couple of things go wrong, the cohen situation, the spygate to the situation.ua if nothing else breaks like that, possibly this horowitz thing. it's 500 pages. but we should give the decision done in the next week wo, whans then we go to battling over a subpoena or getting it ready for a small, tailored, limited interview. >> laura: 150 subpoenas, blank subpoenas. this came out late today. ler has requested that. what could that be about? is that like a mind game? there's more people coming in, it's never going to end. >> frankly, if it is a mind game it works the opposite way.

at this late stage, if you stop issuin0 subpoenas, he's got nothing. >> laura: what have they been doing for the last year? >> where is the collision, where is the obstruction, except in their head.g. ifhey have to do 150 subpoenas point, and everybody knows this, they have no case because donald trump didn't do anything wrong. t >> laura: when you talked to cohen a year ago, i don't know if yard when he was going to try to get that trump tower in moscow done. if he had all these business interests all over the country, and he dropped them. he wanted to get that done andja had reportedly written a note tg to putin, and said, here, what's going to happen, it this is a logjam didn't go anywhere. but that is always listed in the one or two or three russian interest contacts that cohen made. are you aware of this, have you been discussing it? >> we are aware and we think it has no connection.

>> laura: was a green lighted by president trump? >> i can't tell you that, that would be competence,ut the reality is, nothing came of it. there was no quid pro quo for it. in essenif the president had colluded, which he didn't -- tht president will tell you in the two years after the election, i just didn't talk to any russians, i don't know any ns. >> laura: he didn't drink, so you know he didn't order a white russian. >> he doesn't drink at all. they were bitter over losing the election and some right in muller's office were the ones crying like babies the night that host. if they are trying to delegitimatize him. >> laura: the president said that he regrets not having a better relationship with russia because of all of this. >> that's a national security collateral damage of this investigation. thank god he was able to do career. thank god he is man of discipline and could do career. >> laura: rudy giuliani, always great to see you.

tomorrow is a day that could rock, as rudy said it, jim comey's world. we will find out what to expect when that report is handed downl tomorrow on hillary's email investigation. will she be walking in the woods with expedia, you could book a flight, hotel, car, and activity all in one place. ♪

>> laura oh, the suspense is building. >> laura: oh, the suspense is building. can you feel it? tomorrow will be a huge new state of washington. the doj and inspector general will release this highly anticipated report about the email investigation. congressman peter king is predicting it will have devastating news for former fbi chief james comey and his ex-deputy andrew mccabe. let's bring this stellar panel. alan dershowitz, and author of the book, ming out nexnth,

"the case against impeaching trump." you will be very popular in martha's vineyard when that comes out. fox news contributor jason chaffetz, chairman of the house oversight committee,so pleased t making his debut tonight is former federal prosecutor andy mccarthy. great to see all of you. andy, since you are the new kid on the block, let's talk about where we are tonight. this interview that we just had with rudy, they are going to make a decision he said in the next week or so about whether the president will in any way testify, circumscribed questions, or by written answers, unless something really unusual comes out in this ig report. your take on that? >> i still think, laura, if the president was a jist,there woulu have to go through in the justice department to even think about getting a sit down with him.

so i continue to not understand why, if you want to interview the president of the united states as a prosecutor, you don't have to establish preliminarily that there is a serious offense that he has been implicated in, and that he is the repository of information that nobody else has, and youu can only get to from him. frankly unless muller can satisfy that test, and you wrestled with the justice department so many times trying to get records. what do you expect in this ig report tomorrow? >> i think it will be devastating to the higher echelon of the fbi. i think they used and misused their power, and mr. horowitz was unanimously confirmed by the united states senate. he was appointed by

president obama. it should be widely accepted by anybody and everybody on both sides of the aisle as the closest we are going to get to the truth. it deviated from every norm, and it's important to know what it's not going to do, and it's not going to look at anything to do with russia. a but how that clinton case was handled from soup to nuts, top to bottom, you already have a al referral out of the office we will see more text and more emails and the deputies in particular, as well as mr. comey, will shed light on their inappropriate activities as they handled this case. it was fundamentally wrong. >> laura: and the credibility of comey as an impartial guy, just trying get to the truth. alan dershowitz, jeff sessions said in an interview today on the hill tv, he talked about where we are with this ig report. i want to play this for you. >> i think it will be a lengthy report and a careful report. i think it will help us better

fix any a problems that we have and reassure the american peoplb that some of the concerns that have been raised are not true. >> laura: professor dershowitz, your reaction to sessions? i think there will be to igot reports. the one that is released on the one that was changed. i hope that the various senate and house investigating committees subpoena the original draft of the report so that we can see what was hot in it before efforts were made to try to soften it, and perhaps whitewash the justice department. i think in the end, the ig will come out with more public support than the mueller probe now has, and when that happens it will demonstrate that we didn't need a special counsel, that the justice depar peopl p a steak or partisan

interest could have been involved in every aspect of this case. we didn't need to spend $20 million, not for what they allegedly did before then, investigation began, but in response to the investigation. in other words, investigationsig themselves create crimes when people get nervous and upset as the cliche goes, it's in the cover-up. so we are expecting a very, very significant report and we will certainly read it with great care. the one thing that we know is the inspr general has maintained his credibility at a when time when if you have maintained that in the justice department. >> laura: that's a great point. you just wrote this lengthy article about the manner in which the justice department has played this slow walking game of documents. redacting documents saying it would harm national security. he went through point by point their justifications for withholding information, and inj each case if you showed that either that was not the case, not true, totally not necessary, and it just delayed getting toot the bottom of what the real uth is here.

given that, how do we -- how do we not call into question how they have been behaving all along on hurting and harming the ability of the congress to do its oversight role?g >> it's depressing in at regard because national security is the one area of the law where we really do have to keep secrets and we do have to maintain the security of the methods of gathering intelligence, intelligence sources. so it's got to be the one placei when youbout counterterrorism, counterielligence, counterespionage, it's got to be the one place for the gover can look you in the eye and say, you can trust us. the problem with this transcends the whole business of trump in russia, and i understand everyone is obsessed with that now, but what concerns me in the long term is a lot of the things we need to do to protect the

united states that require that we will be able to maintain the integrity of intelligence. and i think when they look you in the eye now and say, you can trust us, a lot of people are don't think so.ack and say, i let's take a look at the deputy attorney general's war with congress., fox news' catherine herridge report of the bombshell yesterday that rod rosenstein threatened to subpoena the records of lawmakers investigating the doj and fbi, which includes the staff.i have. i have to get dershowitz's response as well. this is wild. the reports on capitol hill say these 25-year-old staffers are shaking and asking if they are going to jail, because they don't know how this stuff works. but is that an unprecedented move? is that just rosenstein getting his backup? and what does that do to the future relationship between

congress, which has a constitutional obligation to oversight, and the justice >> it was wholly wrong, but unfortunately not unprecedented. i can tell you that, the inspector general came out with a report, and they literally said it's time to target jason chaffetz and embarrass him. more than 40 agents and abused power, and i have the problems with the irs. i also had some targeting done in the csa. >> laura: that is terrifying. >> now i'm chairman of the committee, i can handle it, i'm an elected official when you are a young staffer, and you have the senior persono at the department justice threatening to dive into her background and subpoena your email, and the problem is leadership in the republican party. they never have your back.

they don't support, they don't go after, they don't stand up for members of congress and they don't stand up for the staff. >> laura: mark meadows was on with me last night. and he heard in real time what jeff sessions said in defense of what rosenstein had done there. this was his response. >> we are a separate branch of h government and they don't have the right to do that unless they are coming under some kind of criminal investigation. for the attorney general to say he is confident that rob rosenstein did everything right, i'm confident that he doesn'ton know what he's talking about. i am here to tell you, we are fed up with. it. >> the idea that the justice department can subpoenas in retaliation for the threaten to issue subpoenas in retaliation for the legislative branch, and this t sounds like the prosecutor on billions more then the prosecutors in the united states.s.

we need to be concerned as civil libertarians when prosecutors threaten to subpoenas in retaliation for a branch ofrs government engaging in appropriate -- >> laura: thank you so much gentleman, we have breaking news. let's go to seoul, south korea, where mike pompeo is addressing reporters. >> the discussions we had today amongst the three of us reflected our three country's d commitment to continue to work together to ensure the success of this effort. today the foreign minister and i discussed the outcome of the summit with chairman kim jong un and the importance of staying closely coordinated through the entire process the president's summit with north korean leaders kim jong un two days ago does indeed mark a turning point in the u.s. and north korea relationship. kim jong un's public commitment

to completely denuclearize brings lasting peace and stability the president said this will be to the entire world. the president said this will be a process and not an easy one. the republic of korea and japan will be critical to the success of that outcome. the world should rest assured that the united states rema committed to achieving theor complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization of north korea. the u.s. alliances with these ironclad. we have developed a close friendship, and together we will continue to closely coordinate with respect to north korea as we move forward together. president trump has also made it clear thn future for north korea and itsht people. he outlined that vision beautifully here in seoul when he spoke last november.the visi,

secure and prosperous north korea which is fully integrated into the community of nations. kim jong un indicated that he shared that vision. we are eager to see him take the next steps to achieve it because the united states is ready for a new chapter in our history. thank you. >> laura: joining us now for instant reaction is senator lindsey graham, member of the house and -- excuse me, i always think of you as the house impeachment manager. it's great to see you. so you heard a tidbit there, what's your reaction? >> aportant statement that south korea, japan and the united states thought the summit went well and were behind

president trump. now if my democratic friends might get behind president trump, we may actualli get a peace deal. a >> laura: some of them are progressive members of congress and they have come out, kind of shocking, and some of them for the impeachment of trump. they thought, let's give peace a chance.ci o a lot of the real criticism comments from chuck schumer or other republicans, sometimes. they throw you in that mix. but i say that's not true. >> i'm a big fan of president trump. he inherited a problem that's been building for 30 years, there's no place for him to kick the can. 20 years ago they didn't havee nuclear weapons and now they have a bunch. they have a missile that could hit north america and if they marry the two up, we are in trouble. he's been saying, i'm not going to let north korea have a missile that could hit us. that's a nonstarter. i will offer them a deal that they can't refuse or should -- shouldn't refuse. but now that they are talking as one, that really should help. compliments to the president.

>> laura: i have a brother who has lived in korea for many years, and he's still there. he said gathered around a little valid villag people are riveted. like every shopkper had a television on. he said, let me tell you. to the south korean people, thin this is positive developments in their lives becausthey have families and north korea. they want to have different scenarios not just for peace and safety but for their cture. they are a very proud people. >> there are over 2 million korean american families. president and i have talked about this and he knows what a war would look like. he would only do this if he had to because a lot of people would get hurt or d it's unnecessary. but the president has made a decision, he's not going to contain a nuclear armed north korea because they will sell what they build. he will bring the program to end in a winning way. but democrats, i ask you one thing. tell the world, north korea and

china, that if diplomacy fails because they play the same old gas, all options are on the table and get behind president trump. >> laura: rand paul says you are a danger to the world because he said that.ai but of course aren't mary options always on the table? >> if not we will never get a deal, i never want to e it. the best way to make se that we have peace is to convince north korea we will have a war that they can't win. trump is doing everything he knows how to avoid a war and i would beg north korea and china to take him up on it. >> laura: it just came outul before you came on that the pentagon is expected to cancel>> the august military exercises with south korea. are you concerned about that or is it to soon to cancel? >> reled me onir force one and he said,seri. they have been twi year, they are designed to tell noh rea if they get in fightwity

will los. i'm willing to stand down to give them the space they need to make an intelligent decision. we can always put the extra size back on schedule but this may be the last best chance in our lifetime for peace. this is a bull move for the president. we will not withdraw our forces, and we will give north korea a athice. toho criticize the president, how well did you do in north korea? >> laura: so you criticize for w ch it costs to do these interviews. i wau t night my research on yom you said it was ridiculous to question how much money it costs. but i kind of like the fact that the president is always worried, whether it's money that we give overseas to count that trashout. but i think most people are like, good, he's looking out for our money. >> the number one job for those the federal governm and the president is to defend the nation.

the congress and the president for the military tora give the training and equipment they need, but, that's something we don't have to fight. >> laura: it's incredibly important against the president. >> if we pulled thatina would make the south china sea.s to the south china. in china is double-dealing now. and they are beginning to back off.f. t if you play trump, you met with him, you shook his hand and told him he wanted to give up your nukes for a good deal. it.this inot barack obama. >> lk at poor justin, that was criticism. it was like, he's going to pay. lindsey graham, so great to have you on. all right, a colorado democrat g thinking that going to extremes on camera will get him elected tos? this is awes "seen and unseen" with raymond arroyo, next

>> laura: it's time for our >> laura: it's time for our and unsegment where we expose what's behind the big cultural stories of the day. we kick off today's edition was something so ridiculous that it has to be seen to believed.d. this is a candidate for congress making a complete buffoon of himself in a desperate bid for votes.

here usn as the fox news contributor and author of the best-selling >> he feels congress has talking over each other in regard to school safety.in the trump administration would like to arm teachers. tillman has a different approach and he demonstrates it. and power and teachers with nonlethal self defense tools, like this can of pepper spray. trust me, this. -- this will stop anywhere now i can't see anything. and in their tracks. for less than $1 per person in the u.s., we can have a secure canister of pepper spray in every classroom in america. it's unbearable, it's like a

lava in your. >> the ad is like a lullaby in >> thank god he is not a wild game advocate. he would be setting off bear trs and bleeding all overea the flr. >> laura: he looks like he is waterboarding himself. in the end i wante spray myself with pepper spray so i didn't have to watch.imlf >> he could have a new show called the candidates againstdi the world. he could breathe in carbon monoxide, drink toilet water -- >> laura: and there is a certain type of black spider that's on the endangered species so i'm living with him. >>ere'she big question, how can you trust him? and, he's a democratic candidate for a house seat in colorado. >> laura: disturbing. so what's going on with the bishop of tucson? at one point, the bishop of g tucson, arizona, as you

mentioned, edward weiss and berger seem to morally equ those enforcing the border with people committing abortions. speaking about border security that takes the part i separating families. watc >> in light of the penalties that are there for life issues, i'm simply asking the question if perhaps our affairs committee could give recommendations to those of us who are border bishops on the possibility of canonical penalties for catholics who are involved in this. for the salvation of these people's souls.en mayb is time for us to look at canonical penalties. >> maybe it's time for you to read a canon law. what is he talking about? >> canonical penalties mean rescinding the sacraments. >> laura: they don't do that for politicians that advocate for abortions, thank you very much. >> i got a call from some border security guys. i said when nancy pelosi getsal

the letter of resignation you can worry.. but remember, the catholic catechism says those who are new to the country must respect the law of the country, none of us want families divided, it's an awful thing. d but we have to come up with policies that don't incentivize peopleo send their children alone across the border. people of pfaff stomach faith, they should be advocatin for unity at home and y here. >> laura: if you walk across the border illegally, it won't look work for all right, what does god look like? you. 60 seconds. >> the university of north carolina did a study, five years and 11 americans. this is what they think god looks like. >> laura: that looks like one of the guys in the control room in new york. >> it's nick robertson, he is basically a nice white guy. no. people tend to project their image and their beliefs onto their image of god. so i thought, i would we define god?nt

so i came up with my own images. here is what i think. frank sinatra and john houston in the greatest story. frnow your picks. >> laura: w frank sinatra? >> now your picks. >> laura: my picks are charlton heston -- that seems like god. god can't look like the kid in apple commercial, like macintosh versus pc. that's like a millennial thing. like god has skinny jeans, a man bun and he is also a boy. >> we want a guy with some authority and gravitas but i think we can agree that god does not look like this. >> laura: these two. george burns and morgan freeman. i never bought either one of those. >> you want god to sound like him. >> george burns was hilarious.

>> we don't want god to sound like this. >> doesn't smoke. >> president trump is on a big-time role, but how is it playing in peoria? frank is here to tell us next. .d just trust duracell. ♪

>> president trump, you have to admit this. he's on a major role. and any world leader would envy where he is right now.

a soaring economy at home, diplomatic triumphs overseas, and there is this headline. tuesday's primary underscores that the g.o.p. is trump's party now. you just had to read my book "a billionaire with a barricade." it drives them absolutely bonkers especially given the loss of south carolina congressman, mark sanford. >> if you dare to speak against the king, donald trump, then he will screw with you and tweet something againsyou. >> why don't we just say it's devolved into a cult? the voters in the republican party have devolved into a cult. >> it's becoming a cultish thing, isn't it. >> laura: why did he want to be secretary of state? but to their chagrin, trump now has tons of political capital to spend as he wishes, just as the all important elections are in view. let's discuss this with frank. trump is the president, he won states that we hadn't seen republicans when in some time and hadn't won a national election since 2004.th diplomatic triumph early, but so

with north korea, the economy soaring, and the old bush party is gone. ner coming back. >> and what people don't realize is his numbers are better than barack obama's at the same points two years into obama's presidency. no one talks about that. you know i've been on occasion critical of the president. i look at north korea, the economy and jobs, not just the polling numbers but the actualth real numbers of the country. how can you be critical at this point? >> laura: what about the judges they put on it? so the question now is, does this ow through with it g.o.p.? it's going into the mid 40s. the question is, does this generic ballot between republicans and democrats, does that also improve? and what we have seen is, it does. the intensity among democrats voting against trump is stronger than the intensity right now for republicans to support keeping the house and senate in g.o.p. hands. a >> laura: what's the best way

for republicans to hold that their message and really spur turnout in november, given your research? >> taxes and jobs, jobs and taxes, taxes and jobs. trump is responsible for messaging, and i would suggest that he visited the troops in november. i would suggest he invites the north korean leader to the white house. h that is significant. i would suggest if he goes himself, but a picture is worths 10,000 words. a picture of him shaking hands with a north korean leader is as significant as nixon going to china. it's aa threat and as muchmpact. these are good days for the president. >> laura: it looks like he's getting nominated for a nobel peace prize. that happened today. e will never get that. they might have to give it to him this time, if this goes as well as i think it will go.

he wants to run against media as well and did it all campaign long. this is what brian stelter said. >> the president is on twitter right now, that is absolutely disgusting. >> you know what, it'sbs disgusting that they don't give him credit for what he has done over the last 72 hours.ov the they don't give him credit for an economy that is truly improved. they are getting what they dese by the tone and the demeanor of the courage. t they are actually helping not just the republicans but they are helping to reelect donald trump. t ra: you got engaged in a bit of a twitter back and forth with brian. >> i know whats like to be on the opposition. and it you have to accept what the facts are. if the economy is good, doesn't he deserve credit? if foreign policy is going in the right direction, why not give him credit? >> laura: that was trumps tweet today, six months ago you would have begged for this deal and now, he was going to blow up the world essentially. i didn't think you would get

credit for it but i think he's amazed that people don't want a what's good for the country, th would rather have a recession or depression with something like that. great analysis and i hope the president listens, we will be right back.

.. ..

>> laura: 's a big news coming out of the pompeo press conference in south korea that is wrapped u >> big news out of the pompeo press conference, the secretary of state said despite the north

korean state media claim, the us will not is sanctions until the north denuclearize is. that is it, we will see you back here tomorrow and bring you the details of the ig report which is dropping in 18 hours or so. shannon bream is next. >> we are on it, thanks so much. we begin with a fox news alert, the beltway is buckling up awaiting the justice department inspector general report on the handling of hillary clinton's email. that investigation, the stage is set. we will tell you what we know and what you can expect tomorrow. donald trump says he and kim jong un understand each other. new details from an exclusive air force one interview with bret baer about what the leaders agreed to at the historic singapore summit and we just heard from secretary of state pompeo was tasked with hammering