away from sand dominic san francisco because of the safety concerns. people are getting sick from the filth. will the city finally clean itself up now that there are real financial costs?e tomorrow night. meanwhile good night from washington.ni sean hannity is next.n. jason is sitting in. >> jason: thanks, tucker. i am from there so i look forward seeing that report. i am jason in for sean. over 18 months ago donald trump was sworn into office as the 45th president of the united states. from day one he hit the ground running. now we are seeing the impact of the trump agenda.it lower regulation, lower taxes. new diplomatic efforts abroad. now president trump will have the opportunity to nominate a second judged the u.s. supreme court.ur a task this president does not take lightly. take a look. >> as you know, there is a vacancy on the supreme court.ou

if you turn into monday at m 9:00, i think you will be extremely happy with the selection. they are all great. they are all great. i want to thank justice kennedy for his lifetime of truly distinguished service. he had confidence in me. he left because he said you're going to pick someone great. that is so nice. so nice.e. a great man. a great gentleman. >> jason: joining us now to with analysis of upcoming decision is a law professor at georgetown universityde jonathan turley. jonathan, thank you for joining us. this is an amazing opportunity in the first two years of his presidency to have a second pick. conservatives always want to have a conservative on the court. what is it do you think they really mean when they say they want a conservative on the court? >> what president trump has

said, he wants to get another nominee in the same mold. i testified in favor of neil gorsuch i considered him an intellect of the first order. i thought that president trump found someone that could legitimately go to that court and contribute in a major way. it will be hard to follow that home run, quite frankly. that is what really prompted justice kennedy to retire. there was a certain comfort factor with the selection. i think that kennedy wanted to spend a year with him. it's now time to leave. i think he's comfortable doing that.

>> jason: with this pick that is coming up, the democrats had signaled, no matter who it is they will go off the rails. is there anything that the democrats can actually do to derail a nominee? n >> jason, as you know, what we are about to see is a time-honored performance. this will occur on capitol hillr with every confirmation of hearing. roe v. wade will once again loom greatly over the hearings. nominees are likely to refuse to answer questions about roe v. wade. they will cite ironically a rule by the democrats called the the ginsberg rule. that was by joe biden when he was chairman. the nominee, in that case, ginsberg, would not be required to give her answer to how she would rule on an issue that h might come before her. since this is a discretionary court, anything could become before her. it has been used since then, it will be used again. we will see what will happen. the worst argument that i have seen put forward was by a couple

of senators, a couple of academics. they said because of the mueller investigation, it is simply improper for the president to nominate anyone. that argument is unfounded. historically and constitutionally. there is no support for that. president trump has every right to make this nomination. >> jason: when amy barrett came up before the senate judiciary committee company started to touch upon the religious aspects. is there a litmus test that they will try to put in front of this nominee? >> that was a particularly raw moment. when senator feinstein made a comment about her catholic dogma, as she referred to it. barrett could make for the most interesting hearing. the fact is that she has not been shy about tackling tough issues.

i often criticize nominees who are blank slates. people who spend their lives avoiding any interesting thoughs or any interesting article. she is not one of those. she has been very much in the debate. she has not held back. that would make her confirmation quite exciting to watch. >> jason: senator mike lee has also been mentioned. he is on the list from the president. being a sitting senator, is there a special pathway? does that hinder his ability? >> jason, in this environment. it is not necessarily a big advantage. the positions in both sides are pretty much baked in. the democrats are looking at a very tough political environment for them to support any nominee, with the exception of a few of these senators in purple states. people like claire mccaskill, joe manchin and west virginia. they'll be in a tough position for this nomination.

but it is a razor-thin margin, there are a couple of republicans that could easily vote. that is what makes his nomination so fascinating. amy coney barrett is the most reliable pro-life nominee. that could end up costing those senators. >> jason: who would you nominate? >> [laughs] it's sort of funny. i think he has some very good people on this list.nk i wouldn't pick a favorite. i think it would be very hard to find another neil gorsuch. i think often times he puts people on short list because of the ease of their confirmation. we need to focus on intellect. that is what will make gorsuch a legacy nominee. objects don't do that. intellect does that. >> jason: it does. i think the democrats do a great

disservice to their country by premaking their decision and announcing no matter what, they will vote against them. jonathan turley, thank you. i appreciate you joining us. the president's nominee for the supreme court will impact this country for decades to come. meanwhile, with just a few short months to the elections, democrats are already ramping up their rhetoric surrounding president trump. during his rally in montana tonight, the president discussed just how low the left would go to malign his agenda. take a look. >> democrats want anarchy. they really do. they don't know who they are playing with, folks.. the house just left, they said there is no collusion. can you imagine this? it's all a ruse. this is an excuse for the y democrats who lost an election.

who actually got their ass kicked. when you see the times, how dishonest -- "the washington post" is. i actually say this. they are all doing numbers that they have never done. when i announce, they will endorse me. if i lose, should i lose, or if i don't run, are they going to cover bernie? i wrote fast salaries. i guess i speak well. you know we turned awayy thousands of people.re they never say i'm a great speaker. why the hell do so many people come? >> jason: [laughs] gotta love the president. joining us now, tom fitton. republican national spokesperson, kayleigh mcenany. at civil rights defense attorney david schoen. thank you for joining us tonight. and particularly after the president was speaking there in montana. come monday, we are not slowing down with july fourth.

monday, supreme court,i' tuesda, peter strzok. kayleigh, i'm going to go to you first. how do you expect the democratsa to act this week? they have a 1-2 punch right out of the chute. >> they do. we told democrats at the rnc to go find a message. go find a message. we didn't tell them to find an insane message. as the president continues to succeed, they lurch to the left. they rebelled. you see people like maxine waters, standing up calling for absolute harassment of tripll officials. they are going absolutely nuts. i will imagine they will surgeam further to the left, to their socialist candidates. they will call for anarchy, complete chaos. the president has them like a dog running for its own tail in circles. >> jason: the supreme court is such a pivotal pick. it is the reason why so many people were so excitedth about

donald trump becoming the president. how do you see this playing out for the president? >> it is a huge issue.th it will be in the midterms also for two reasons. one, depending on the contentiousness of the hearing. i know the president very much wants to have the nominee confirmed before the midterm. even if he or she is, it will still be a big issue. voters think it is quite likely that the president will get a third pick. the short list is all three areh very bright, very capable people. i am sorry to see diane off of that list. she was on it before, also very capable. it will be a contentious hearing. it is a huge, huge issue. we could certainly break down these three nominees if we have time on the show. they have plenty to offer. >> jason: tom fitton, i want to get to you as it relates to peter strzok. you have done -- as a former chairman of the oversight committee, nobody was rooting

more for judicial watch than me. you are amazing being able to extract documents at the department of justice. but they are still stonewalling. as we go into this peter strzok hearing, what would you like too see and what documents do you still need to see at judicial watch? >> it is hard to question someone when you don't have all the documents. congress still doesn't have all the text messages, the emails. the government told us they want to take up to two years to turn over the communicationsov betwen strzok and page. in fact, they just gave us a batch of emails. as best as i can tell, those are the first publicly available emails we have between page and stzrok. they don't talk about russiagate yet. at least the process has begun. that is better than what congress is facing with the justice department. they haven't committed in providing anything. mr. strzok hasn't committed to testifying on the hill. his lawyer is arguing on whether he will testify or not. so congress has to decide to

fish or cut bait on this, continually threaten the administration or members with impeachment or contempt and not follow through doesn't seem to be getting them anywhere. they need to escalate it. either by bringing the president directly or coming up with other ways to force the justice's hand in producing these records that congress has a right to see under the constitution and the law. the justice department is thumbing its nose at congress. it's thumbing its nose at the presidency. there's a real crisis here. the document fight is just one symptom of it.oc it's all designed to protect this terrible corruption that took place within the obama administration and continued into the trump administration through the compromised mueller investigation. >> jason: people talk about the deep state. when i went there, i didn't know much about it. now i found that it is very real. i wrote a book about it.t. it's coming out in september. david, what should congress do to extract those documents and

what would you ask peter strzok when he appearsok as he has opposed to under subpoena on tuesday. >> there is a whole set of questions. i think it is playing out like a circus now. his lawyer was boasting that strzok wants to publicly testify. he's been a victim. he wants to clear his name. he's going to have to eat those emails. now they allowed him to appear behind closed doors, which i thought was a mistake. there is no reason for them to do that. they have the upper hand. now his lawyer is saying it is y setup. "we need to know about that meeting in mccabe's office. that happened with strzok, page, with the agenda of stop trump. i want to back up one second. what tom fitton and judicial watch is doing is tremendously important that a great service to the i country. the documents thereafter, including andrew weissmann's emails, now the from strzok,

let's see what the people who we know who has an agenda, let'set see what their email said. he is after the fisa applications. documents are power. this is a vitally important source. we need transparency. the american people should all demand them. congress is doing a great service to the greatest degree, they demand these documents and answers from peter strzok. don't stop with peter strzok here. the risk is to make peterer strk the bad guy so he is a bad apple. it is a culture that he represents. no one told him to stop doing this at the justice department when he was doing it. it is a culture. >> jason: good point. kayleigh, the president took th> spotlight of the country to great falls, montana.s he is now traveling back in the country where he will announce the supreme court pick at 9:00 p.m. on monday night. peter strzok hearing happening on tuesday. we see people climbing the statue of liberty. talking about the resistance movement.hi you been watching this up close

and personal. contrast what is happening with the republicans and the message of what donald trump is doing, versus the flailing we see with democrats. >> it is quite a contrast. at the republican party, we celebrate the achievements that are happening every day. let's put this in the context of the nomination.. put aside the economy that is roaring. hitting historic heights. put aside the historic north korean summit. put aside all the great things this president has done. this nomination alone will make this presidency one of the most consequential in modern history. changing the balance on the supreme court. we are celebrating over at the republican party. that phrase that i love so much, from reagan, it is morning in america again.ha we are celebrating this positive achievement record that is happening daily, democrats are going farther and farther left. it's incredible to say that the democratic party, when you were embracing socialism, dnc chair tom perez said ocasio-cortez and socialism are the new phase of

our party. that is a striking moment that her democratic counterparts, not only areem calling for basically violent harassment, but now embracing socialism, which has failed across the world. >> jason: tom, do you ever get support our judicial watch for members of the democratic party? you would think that the democratic party of the old is one that wanted transparency. do they ever like your transparency? >> there are some democrats that like the freedom of information act. they like it now that trump is in office. they are using it to investigate his administration. i frankly, we've sued the trump administration more than anyone else in the city for documents under foia. i think the big problem for democrats in general, there is a pro-violence virus going throughout the supporters and officials like maxine waters.vi

she needs to be ethically censored or expelled for inciting violence against the trump cabinet. they will lose the supreme court nomination. their members and supportersrt will be frustrated. it is up to the leadership of the democratic party and liberal leaders to say we don't want to violence. we don't want you attacking law enforcement. we don't want you breaking the law. government officials who are serving in the trump administration. if you are an elected official who does, we will drum you out, not only the house but potentially the senate. that is the problem they are facing politically. >> jason: david, got out quickly, just a moment, maxine waters and what she said, away from the capital ratios protected by the speech and debate clause, have you seen her spec over the line? has she done anything illegal? >> i don't know about illegal. she stepped over the line as aoi

matter of judgment. i know she is passionate about what she is saying. there is no place in the public discourse forthright in that kind of conduct from a public official. there is no place for it. >> jason: i agree with you. life is tough enough, members of the congress on both sides of sf the aisle, to have to be away from your family, to have to take the public criticism, they signed up for it, gotot to be tough. but you have another member inciting that steps over the line. i thank you very much, the three of you. please stay at home with us because coming up, the oversight committee trey gowdy is a peer to discuss anti-trump fbi agent peter strzok's testimony scheduledd for tuesday as the special edition of "hannity" continues. ♪ a little bit of water, it really- it rocked our world. i had no idea the amount of damage that water could do. we called usaa. and they greeted me as they always do. sergeant baker, how are you?

they were on it. it was unbelievable. having insurance is something everyone needs, but having usaa- now that's a privilege. we're the baker's and we're usaa members for life. usaa. get your insurance quote today.

they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages

all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again

this wi-fi is fast. and never go to i know! i know! i know! i know! when did brian move back in? brian's back? he doesn't get my room. he's only going to be here for like a week. like a month, tops. oh boy. wi-fi fast enough for the whole family is simple, easy, awesome. in many cultures, young men would stay with their families until their 40's. ♪

>> jason: welcome back to the special edition of 325: anti-trp fbi agent peter strzok has beent tuesday. but according to his attorney, peter strzok may not comply with the subpoena. watch this. >> y will your client comply wih a subpoena or the request? will lead to another interview? >> my client will testify publicly soon, somewhere, sometime. we just got the subpoena today so i don't know whether or not we are going to be testifying next tuesday in front of these two particular house subcommittees. >> whisenant and automatic yes? >> because we have come to the conclusion, forced to the conclusion, because it is not a search for truth, a search for republican members of the house to preen and posture before their most radical conspiracy minded constituents.

>> jason: joining memi with reaction's house oversight chairman, south carolina congressman trey gowdy. the author of a book with senator tim scott called "unified." thank you so much for joining us tonight. conspiracy theories he was talking about that we as republicans by making to the stuff. i want to play a clip from adam schiff talking, that you were one of the four horsemen of the apocalypse. let's play this clip here. >> sadly here, we have all too many members of congress willing to prostrate themselves before p the executive and give him anything he wants. >> you want to name names, which members of congress are in this cultlike group that you are suggesting? >> the four horsemen of this apocalypse have been devin nunes andth trey gowdy, mark meadows, and jim jordan. theyma have been leading the charge basically to require the justice department to give them materials that can best leaked r fed or misrepresented like the infamous nunes memorandum in the

service of the president. >> jason: interesting comments from mr. adam schiff. mr. gaudi, how many times have you met, interacted with donald trump? >> i've never met president trump, never had a conversation. i want to get to strzok and page and a second, jason, i took that as a complement initially. i'm a huge ric flair fan. any time says you are part of the four horsemen, i thought it was a compliment. it was my wife who said i think you are talking about the four guys from the top comic book of revelations. adam has had a terrible last couple of years. he wanted to be the attorney general c under hillary clinton and nobody worked harder to protect her then adam schiff. he wanted to run for california, run for senate in the people's republic of china for one you. he couldn't win either of those seats. now he wants to be the chairman of the house intelligence committee. speaking of the apocalypse. adam schiff want to be the chairman of the house

intelligence committee. if you ever have, i don't know, a couple of three months with nothing else to do, go back and think of all the things he would not know if you had taken adam schiff's advice. you wouldn't know the spontaneous reaction to a video was a hoax in libya, you would never have read the first chris stevens email. you wouldn't knowst that hillary clinton had this unique email arrangement with herself because adam shifted everything in his power to keep you from finding out. you wouldn't know about the dossier. you wouldn't know who.w he wouldn't know it was using a court proceeding. you wouldn't know about strzok and page. in fact, he wouldn't be having a show tonight, a show about strzok and page if adam schiff had his way. they secede fromif the union and president maxine waters wants to make him the attorney general, more power to it. otherwise, i don't think anyone on my side of the aisle gives much of a damn what adam schiff says. >> jason: he gets out there and says it a lot, whatever he

is saying. he's missed used and misled that position, for my own personal vantage point, time and time again. coming before you, though, is peter strzok. as i recall, he originally said he would voluntarily testify, he wanted to get out and tell his story. then youth heard his attorney sy that he may not show up. i'm sorry if anyone hurt his feelings last week during the 13 hours we spent. the only thing i did was go over what he had written. so if he is offended, he's offended with things that he wrote. he wrote a lot of texts, there arear emails. it's an unprecedented level of animus. so of course he's going to be asked, what did you mean -- i can't use all of the words on a family-friendly show like yours, but what did you s mean by blinking up a what did you mean by blinking this? we went through all of these texts, here's what is important,

jason, he supposed to be investigating hillary clinton for investigations of the espionage act. he thinks she should win the president 1 million to zero. they didn't even have a republican nominee at theth tim. she's going to win 100 million to zero. in march of 2016 -- best, according to the guy who was supposed to be dispassionately and objectively interviewing her. then in july, when the russia probe starts, he is saying terrible things about the very person he is supposed to be objectively investigating. then we get to the mueller prob probe. all three, hillary clinton, russia probe, mother probe until they found the texts. he is talking about impeachment even beforee the house democras and msnbc were talking about impeachment. he had been on the case three days before he was talking about impeaching the president. so of course we will have a lot

of questions for him and some of themme might actually be uncomfortable. but he's going to come before a public hearing whether his lawyer thinks he will or not. he's coming. i'm sure he would rather go in front of adam schiff. that is what i read it. he'd rather go in front of adam schiff. they have a lot in common. they both wanted hillary clinton to keep be president. i get what he wants to go there. he's going to come before our two committees whether he wants to or not. >> jason: looked, peter strzok did not have an insignificant job, as i like to say, he didn't work for the fish and wildlife service department. he was the number two person in counterintelligence for the united states federal bureau of investigation, tens of thousands of people to choose from. have you been able to find out why is it that he was selected or appointed to go beyond the mueller probe? >> well, you got to go all the way back to clinton. he was on the clinton probe. then in july, not only was he on the russia probe. mueller, he was the lead agent

on the russia probe. 39. in july of 2016, we just got through jim comey with the unprecedented press conference, and three weeks later, he is working on donald trump's campaign and the russia probe. i think that group was then transposed over onto the russia probe and then, many of them, were transposed onto the mueller probe. i will give mueller credit for this, the moment he found out about the texts, he got rid of peter strzok. here's what you want to be asking yourself. if it was bad enough or bob mueller to get rid of him that moment he found out about them, they weren't written in march of 2017. they were written in march of 2016. so he never should have been on any of these three probes. if the animus enough was enough to kick them off when you found out, the animus should have been enough to kick them off when you said it, which was early in 2016. completely the wrong person. the fbi's reputation -- look. there are lots and lots of fantastic fbi agents.

99.9% of them. but you picked this person, not just him. lisa page and other heretofore not identified i fbi agents, remember when jim comey, i think you were in the room, he said the fbi didn't give a hoot about politics, go read these texts. they give a lot more than a hoot about who is going to be the democratic nominee and whether donald trump would win. >> real quickly, only got a few seconds. lisa page was on the other end of those texts. was going to happen with her? >> she's coming, too. i heard your graph, i disagree. anytime you have a chance to spend 12 hours with a witness, you want to spend it. i get 5 minutes with peter strzok and the public hearing. i got ten hours with him last week. so we'll interview her and i hope we have a public hearing with her but it's more important to me that all of these questions get asked on the record, talk about -- if you want a serious investigation, take the ten hours over the 5 minutes is what i was told my

fellow citizens. >> jason: need to get the documents from the department of justice. trey gowdy, thank you so much. coming. up on the special editin of "hannity," president trump earlier previewed his big upcoming foreign policy trip including his meeting with russian president vladimir putin. wait until you're here ready had to say about this. that's after the break. ♪ (electronic dance music)♪ ♪

♪ ♪ he eats a bowl of hammers at every meal ♪ ♪ he holds your house in the palm of his hand ♪ ♪ he's your home and auto man ♪ big jim, he's got you covered ♪ ♪ great big jim, there ain't no other ♪ -so, this is covered, right? -yes, ma'am. take care of it for you right now. giddyup! hi! this is jamie. we need some help.

♪ >> i'm going to tell nato, you got to start paying bills. united states is not going to take care of anything. they go out and they make a gas deal, oil and gas from russia, where they pay billions and billions of dollars to russia. okay? so they want to protect against russia, yet they pay billions of dollars to russia, and we are the smocks that are paying for the whole thing. so then -- by the way, i have to

say this. since i came, which was a year and a half, almost $33 billion more is projected to be paid by those nato nations, but it's not enough. do they ever tell you that? no. they go, "president trump, be prepared, president putin's kgb, and this and that." you know what? putin is fine. he's fine. we are all fine. we are people. will i be prepared? totally prepared. i've been preparing for the stuff my whole life. welcome back to this special edition of "hannity." that was president trump it is really early in the trump in montana discussing his foreign policy agenda. he's preparing for a foreign policy trip or he will go to belgium, and sit down one-on-one with russian president vladimir putin in helsinki. there are reports of the challenges that trample fees well abroad. he said to be met by protest at

each stage of his u.k. visit plus reports that nato allies hope for harmony. joining us now for reaction are fox news contributors allen west and richard fowler. gentlemen, thank you so much for being here tonight. richard, i'm going to start with you. you were here in studio. is there anything wrong with donald trump meeting with a. putin one-on-one? >> i'm happy he's meeting with him. i just hope that they work on mending their fences with tomato, mending fences with canada, amending the fences with mexico before we focus on dealing with our number one -- >> jason: mending the fence with mexico? about building the fence. >> i think it's beyond that. midnight tonight, we start a trade war with china. 118 of their items on tariffs. they will respond right away. on top of that, we are in a small trade war with the european union, small trade war with canada. we need all of these countries to work with us if we really want to counterbalance china and if we really want to counterbalance russia. the fact that we are playing the game of, u.s. go it alone against the world, that is

problematic for our foreign policy, especially when we have allies that are willing to go with us against china and willing to go with us to counterbalance russia. >> jason: allen west, colonel allen west i should say, colonel, how do you see this meeting with trump playing? is richard right or wrong about the meeting with putin? >> i find it very interesting, my former colleague, jason, that richard would say the number one geopolitical fall of the united states of america is russia because that is something that president barack obama did not believe and dumb i could not debate in 2012. the most important thing is that we have to understand that you are dealing with someone and fight every putin who said that his number one disappointment in of the 20th century was the collapse of the soviet union. it should be made especially clear to him that there will never be a restoration of the soviet union. over the last few months, we have seen major military exercises, a special operations type exercise, and also a conventional exercise, with the baltic states, ads, as well as the folks down there in poland. i think it's very important that

we continue to show that military cooperation and strength in my first assignment was with a nato rapid reaction airborne for us and we need the people of the countries of nato to step up. they should not be buying oil and natural gas from russia because that would help to undermine his economic viability. >> jason: let's go to a clip here. i want to show you president trump 30 years ago when he was on oprah winfrey's show talking about the need for nato to step up and pay their fair share. >> you took out a full-page ad in major u.s. newspapers criticizing u.s. foreign policy. what would you do differently, donald? >> i would make our allies -- forgetting about the enemies, i would make our allies pay our fair share. we are a debtor nation. something is going to happen over the next number of years with this country because you can keep on going losing 200 billion and yet we let japan come in and up and everything every mature markets, it's not free trade. kuwait, they look like kings by the poorest person in kuwait, they look like kings. yet, we make it possible for them to sell their oil.

why are they paying a 25% of what they are making? it's a joke. >> jason: that was 30 years ago. richard, donald trump has held that position for a while. nato, they are our allies but as of the president right in saying they should pay their fair share? >> every president has called that. let's remember why nato exists. it was created to counterbalance the soviet union. if vladimir putin's number one thing is to bring back the soviet union, nato is the only speed bump in the way of making that happen. >> jason: he asking them to put more money and -- >> it means we are the world leader, the number one leading democracy, the city upon the hill, we are supposed to lead the free world. that requires that we put skin in the game. >> jason: we put 4% of our growth -- >> absolutely. >> jason: germany puts 1%. 1%! >> announcing that nato country shouldn't pay more. i'm saying, picking a fight with nato is not the way to get there. the president getting in a fight

with nato and the u.s. go it alone mentality is not going to win as any new friends. it's only going to create more enemies. >> jason: i see that as not trying to go it alone, it's saying, partners, pony up. we put three, 4% of our gdp and for germany only puts in one and some of them put a paltry amount, they need to catch up. colonel west, these allies are pivotal to doing what we need to do and making sure the world a safer and more secure. but isn't it fair for nato to pay more to boost up and support the united states, even though we are leading the way? >> i have to tell richard that he is looking at a guy who wants to put his skin in that game for three years being stationed in europe as well as my father-in-law, and hundreds of thousands of soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, have been doing that. we provided a defensive shield so that the european nations would be able to stand up on their own two feet. instead of them charging us tariffs on the goods and services, they should be ponying

up and assisting in helping us and standing up with us to push back against this incredible photo that we see. now what you see with latvia, estonia, lithuania, and also poland, you see those countries that are standing up and doing exactly what president trump has said. put your shoulder to the wheel and stand there with us. >> a couple of things. thing number one, yes, that is true. remember, i was having nato is part of our strategic role and making sure that russia doesn't expand number one. number two, more importantly, every time -- when our troops are over there, if united states strength and power. that is important. if we want to be the world leader, we will continue to show that power and we can't let the world show that power for us. >> we have always been nato. >> starting a trade war is not the way to get them to come on board. >> jason: is making things fair and balanced. donald trump putting america first is exactly what he campaigned on and what he is doing. thank you so much for coming out tonight.

coming up on the special edition of "hannity," president trump is once again going after the left and democrats over their dangerous illegal immigration policies and their calls to abolish i.c.e. more on that next. ♪

♪ >> if you look at jon tester, he signed up for theth democrats' radical immigration agenda, which is, let them come in, and we believe, they say, in sanctuary cities, where they housend the criminals, and othe. we believe in strong borders and all crime. a very simple. the new platform of the democratic party is to abolish i.c.e., and in othermo words, ty

want to abolish immigration enforcement entirely. that is what they want to do. they want everybody coming in. >> jason: welcome back to thisec special edition of "hannity." that was president trump tonight in montana blasting democrats for their weak policy on illegal immigration, border security, and their attacks on i.c.e. the president's remarks, a day after several leftist unveiled and abolish i.c.e. banner. one even climbed the statue of liberty which led to herhe arre. the president addressed the protester tonight at his rally. >> you saw that clown yesterday on the statue of liberty. you see the guys that went up there. i wouldn't have done it. i would have said, let's get some nuts and let's wait till she comes down. just get somewa nuts. >> jason: i think that would've worked. a short time ago, the president took another shot at democrats on the abolish i.c.e. issue. tweeting "every day the brave

men and women of i.c.e. are liberating communities from savage games, gangs like ms-13. we will not stand for these mild democratic smears and law enforcement. we will always stand proudly with the brave heroes of i.c.e. and border patrol. joining us now with reaction, author of the upcoming book, "mad politics: keeping your sanity in a world gone crazy," member of a donald trump community advisory advisory re, gina loudon, and joining us and studio, cathy areu. i want to ask you first, do they think they are scoring points with the american people by instituting this resistance movement, climbing the statue of liberty on the fourth of july? >> are you talking the resistance movement, the women's march? 700 marches, yes. that is a good movement. but this fringe movement with the abolish i.c.e. and what's going onen there, no. americans are not siding with that. that's not the democratic party.

>> jason: you have members of congress introducing pieces of legislation to abolish i.c.e. speculative fringe movement, movement. it's going to be more moderate in november. the marchers are the reality. >> jason: i don't see any harm. marching is the american way. i think that is a healthy thing and we should encourage more people to do it on both sides of the aisle. but gina, we have been seeing people that have been out there, "abolish i.c.e., they don't want any borders, they have pieces of legislation saying they shouldn't arrest people within 100 miles coming to the country illegally, a free pass for 100 miles. do you think that's resonating with the american people? >> [laughs] no. that is why people like cathy are trying to deny what is really going ont here and let e ask you this, jason. we're all mike where the outrage today for what happened on the fourth of july at our statue of liberty? the impunity of people who have traveled all across the world,

had one day to david statue of liberty, and they didn't get to, or the families that wanted to spend their independence day celebrating that t way. where's the outrage from the democrats, if they don't stand by? if they don't stand by what happened yesterday? >> their day is not ruined. their day was enlightened. they were able to -- >> they evacuated. >> trump is dividing america and they were able to see a perfect example. >> jason: wait, hold on. a protester climbs the statue of liberty andd you think that was enlightening? >> absolutely. this is what america is. the whole world sees it. you said it was a fringe movement. trump is causing -- >> jason: is not causing the fringe movement. he's trying to protect america. >> donald trump is a fringe movement himself. he was a birther. he was part of the fringe movement. now he's causing people to lose their minds, climb the statue of liberty, and show the rest of the world -- >> jason: donald trump's fault that this person climbs the

statue of liberty? gina? >> he's familiar with the fringe movement. >> if i could break in here, t ever since they started this ridiculous immigration fight that everyone knows is a lie, i'ma going to explain why, the president's numbers, with hispanics, have gone up ten points. so you just can't make the argument that this is working. here's why it's really wrong because they are preying on the backs of children.ng suppose the democrats get their way, jason. they get to abolish i.c.e., and they get their way, when somebody who crosses the border with a child and says they are t their parents and they are turned for in the united states, they can live happily ever after. you know what will happen? every single criminal ms-13 rapist drug person is going to grab a child on itss way over so they can get into america -- >> ms-13>> as american-made!

>> have you even considered the actual outcome, the families that it will separate, and the children that it will kill if you will get your way because you don't take it to its logical end? >> jason: cathy, do you support the abolishment of i.c.e.? >> do i? absolutely not. we have terrorists in the world. i.c.e., one of my best friends from high school works there -- >> jason: when you see the democrats pushing to dismantle i.c.e. -- >> that is like the birther movement. i see it as fringe, i don't see it is what the democrats support. >> jason: but you support the person who was climbing the statue of liberty in the name of that. >> i support the exercising of her freedom. >> jason: she's breaking the law. it's because she's showing what this trump moment is causing america -- >> jason: she's breaking the law. she shut down the hall place. people take time at bonnie -- >> and they are seeing exactly what the trump a administration has caused some people -- >> they are seeing how radically left and social as the americans

are. americans,er including blacks ad hispanics,sp or walking away in droves. >> i'm hispanic and i stand here strong. you definitely don't speak for all hispanics. >> i didn't claim to speak for all hispanics. >> the numbers have increased since the left has taken on this very deceptive fight against -- >> trump's fight against the immigrants. not the democrats. >> jason:: thank you so much for joining us. >> illegal immigrants. stop conflating -- >> undocumented. not a legal. >> jason: coming up, more on this special edition of "hannity." we'll be rightow back. body canl make its own insulin. and once-weekly trulicity activates my body to release it. trulicity is not insulin. it comes in a once-weekly, truly easy-to-use pen. it works 24/7.

trulicity is an injection to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. don't use it as the first medicine to treat diabetes or if you have type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, you're allergic to trulicity, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your low blood sugar risk. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and decreased appetite. these can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i choose once-weekly trulicity to activate my within. if you need help lowering your a1c, ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity.

like concert tickets or a new snowboard. matt: whoo! whoo! jen: but that all changed when we bought a house. matt: voilà! jen: matt started turning into his dad. matt: mm. that's some good mulch. ♪ i'm awake. but it was pretty nifty when jen showed me how easy it was to protect our home and auto with progressive. [ wrapper crinkling ] get this butterscotch out of here. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. there's quite a bit of work, 'cause this was all -- this was all stapled. but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us. they have businesses to run

they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again

♪ >> jason: welcome back to their special edition of "hannity," unfortunately, that's all the time we have h left. i'm jason chaffetz, jason and the house if you follow me on social media.

but we are very fortunate to have pete hegseth who is filling in for laura ingraham next. >> pete: you should have given up the congress thing a long time ago. >> jason: they tell me, i love it. >> pete: well, good evening from new york city, welcome to "the ingraham angle," i am pete hegseth in for laura, lots of news tonight. president trump wrapped up a big rally in montana a short time ago, making waves, as you can imagine on everything from illegal immigration to maxine waters, whose favorite nickname for his favorite senator in massachusetts. we have it all covered this evening and three candidates are said to remain for a president trump's supreme court. that's what fox news is reporting. new details on the democratic onslaught against whoever the finalist is no matter who he or. she may be. and why we could be seeing the democrat party self-destruct before our eyes.