those cards were returned along with other unsold cards by retailers to make room for the '53 cards and the returned '52 cards were subsequently dropped from a barge in the hudson river in new york. and for even more of your baseball fix, catch tonight's mlb all-star game live on fox and 8:00 p.m. eastern time. >> we'll be watching it. "outnumbered" starts right now. >> harris: fox news alert, president trump is gearing up to host lawmakers at the white house amid criticism over his summit with russian president vladimir puritan. another president is pushing back. you're watching "outnumbered." i'm harris faulkner. here today, fox business networks dagen mcdowell, also from fb and host of the intelligence report, trish regan. the the public in a strategist and senior fellow for women's voice, lisa boothe. and josh holmes. a republican political strategist and former chief of staff to senate majority leader mitch mcconnell, wonder what

your boss is doing today. if great to see you. >> josh: enjoying himself as always i imagine. >> harris: that sweet, good to have you. let's get to the news. new reaction to president trump summit with russian leader vladimir putin yesterday in helsinki, finland, . lawmakers on both sides of the particle while accusing president trump of taking the side of the russian president over election meddling. watch. >> i just felt like the president's comments made us look as a nation more like a pushover. >> why in the world would you cast aside your friends and allies and believe your main adversary? it's baffling. >> what mr. trump did yesterday was to betray the women and men of the fbi, cia, nsa, and others. and to betray the american public and that's why use the term is as nothing of treasonou

treasonous. >> the man that should be leader of the free world purports to draw a moral equivalency between the u.s. intelligence community and vladimir putin who was a murderous thug. >> harris: it's been an interesting morning already. just a short time ago, senate minority leader chuck schumer outlined four things he says congress must do following the summit, including sanctions against russia, demanding the president's national security team testify about what the two leaders said behind closed doors, ending attacks on the doj, fbi, and a special counsel, and insisting putin turnover the 12 russians indicted for election interference. >> words are not enough, our response to the debasement of the american interest before a foreign adversary demands a response not just in word, but in deed. our country needs to see

republicans in the senate and the republican party stand up and show the reaction that unlike our president, they will not tolerate russian aggression. or except putin's lies. i republican colleagues cannot just go to school. >> harris: revoking congressman mark meadows and g.o.p. senator rand paul said he handled the situation appropriately considering the circumstances. >> it was a bold move to be willing to meet with putin one-on-one. no one is taken election interference more seriously than i have. at the end of the day, we need to make sure that we put this investigation behind us and beyond the offense in terms of trying to make sure that our election process is protected. >> i think we need to take a step back and ask ourselves is a good to have conversation with your adversaries? is a good to have open lines of communication with russia? i think having open lines of

communication is very important for avoiding war and i think that's what i would see this meeting as. >> harris: president trump himself defending his performance at yesterday's summit on hannity. >> i thought it was a really amazing time i think it's a shame we are talking about nuclear proliferation, talking about syria and humanitarian aid, talking about all of these different things and we get questions on the witch hunts. and i don't think the people out in the country buy it, but the reporters like to give it a shot. it's a very long meeting and it was a good meeting, we discussed so many different things including nuclear, including war and peace, including economic syria, ukraine, at the end of this meeting, i think came to a lot of good conclusions. >> harris: he is our president as a nation, not left or right, get our president is taking criticism from both sides.

why? >> josh: i think you made a mistake yesterday and let me be very clear about what i think was a mistake. nobody is criticizing his view that we should have an open discussion with vladimir putin and russia. i think that's constructive. that piece of the meeting, great. where he made a big mistake as he continues to conflate the issue of russian collusion with russian meddling in our election. and on the world stage, you are not afforded the luxury as president of the united states at dividing what are american institutions being the intelligence community and the fbi from your administration as a whole in front of foreign adversaries. you just aren't. that's not a luxury the president of the united states has. and furthermore, i think by continuing to give his critics fodder to suggest that somehow he is hiding something on russia does more to undermine his presidency and the end of this mueller investigation than anything else he can do. i think that was a mistake.

i think rand paul and others that were talking they are missing the point. it is not about whether we are interacting with russia. that's fine. the point is, if you're going to go on a foreign stage, you represent the united states of america as a whole and you don't bring your petty political squabbles with you. >> harris: not only is it fine that he be having this conversation, it is president. we know that barack obama was talking to the leadership of iran before that landmark deal was made which had all sorts of secrecy and side deals. >> josh: there's other thing that's worth noting here. the critics like chuck schumer want to get in a wrestling match with putin at the summit. just a few years ago when president obama was confronting president xi of china after the chinese hacking of office of management and budget and taking all kinds of american secrets, there was no confrontation. there was no face-to-face showdown. what there was was a back channel that may very well have

taken place during the conversation that president trump had with president putin. >> lisa: it was also obama in 2016 that said public shaming of russia and putin is not going to be effective in regards. >> harris: >> harris: isn't aboc shaming though. >> lisa: is not. i think the reason that president trump is conflating the two issues because democrat in the media have done so to try to undermine his legitimacy but the problem is what josh mentioned, when you're on the world stage next to putin in russia, a country that the pentagon labeled back in january as one of our nations biggest threats, that is not a time for ambiguity. and it is the time to be very clear in what you said and the problem, if you go back and look at the transcript, president trump is all over the place and that's the time to be very definitive. >> harris: can i ask a question before you hit that next one? do you think that we treated this president putin like the adversary that you just

described what did we treat him like an ally yesterday? >> lisa: i think president trump just like presidents before him and obama as well is trying to reset relations with president putin. to the problem is coming to look at someone like putin and he senses any sort of weakness, he's going to take advantage of it. so i think with president trump, that was a perfect time, didn't even have to talk about the presidential election. look ahead at the midterm elections and say putin knows he's not going to mess with the midterm elections, done, move on. and instead, he lives all this room for ambiguity, he's all over the place so people can misconstrue it however they want or take it for what it looks like. >> dagen: i wanted to see intimidation. i wanted to see some tall guy intimidation over that little squad 5'6" on a good day vladimir putin. rather than tossing around a soccer ball. "the wall street journal" editorial page price today the charitable explanation for this is that mr. trump can't get past

his theory that critics claim his elections were tainted by russian interference which you guys touched on. but then they go on to say he can't seem to figure out that the more he indulges his ego in this fashion, the more he seems to indulge mr. putin and the more ammunition he gives to his opponents and i point at trish who came out hard on this when she heard this press conference yesterday that we cover busines business. and president trump is a businessman. he is the ceo of the united states of america. but is not a private company. he doesn't own it. we are the shareholders, the american people are the shareholders in this public company. he's the ceo for all of us, not himself. >> trish: he needed to defend us. if you are having some in your family, you may be having those squabbles. but if there is someone who is an enemy of your family and is taking you on publicly, you kind

of need those family members at a time like that and he missed it yesterday. it was an easy question, he should have known it was coming, all he had to say was you know what? we are not going to allow that to happen again. that's all in the past, we are resetting the future. it was easy, he could've made this a home run, i thought he would've, i'm disappointed. he was not the patriot he should've been yesterday on the stage. >> harris: a couple of things that are happening today that we know of and one of them has to do with where the republicans are sitting. how will they deal with this? some inside the party are saying some senators on the g.o.p. side of the aisle are saying maybe they'll do a resolution, really making it clear how lawmakers on capitol hill see the meddling that definitely happened by russia and our election. in separate that out. they could help and give the president some help in this in separate that out from whatever collusion is going on. i don't know if they go that far in a resolution but that's been

talked about moving on today. the other thing is the president is meeting with some lawmakers in the roosevelt room to talk about these very issues. i want to give you the last word on what you think that meeting should be like. >> lisa: is going to be interesting. probably going to get an earful about yesterday. >> harris: how do we go forward? >> lisa: in all honesty, the new cycle is so busy this day that that next week will be talking about something else but republicans are going to be frustrated because anytime someone says something, every republican has to answer for it. this is what the media does. so now all these numbers on capitol hill are going to be very frustrated because i have to answer to this and deal with this and what's so frustrating is if you actually look at the actions of this administration, he's been tough on russia. it shouldn't have to be this difficult. >> dagen: here's what they're going to do, for a fact of the economy, talk about another round of tax cuts, tax reform,

number one, and number two on russia. he said harder line on the administration. meantime, russian president vladimir putin sitting down with her very own chris wallace last night following that landmark summit with president trump. the exclusive interview getting heated at many moments as wallace challenged putin on tough topics including russian meddling in our election. take a look. >> i have here the indictment that was presented on friday from the special counsel robert mueller that says that while members of russian military intelligence, the gru, and i talk about units 26, 165 and 74, or 55, they say. if you smile, let me finish. they say these units were specifically involved in hacking

into democratic party computers, stealing information, and spreading it to the world to try to disrupt the american electio election. may i give this to you to look at, sir? >> i really wish for your american listeners to listen to what i say. first of all, russia as a state has never interfered with the internal affairs of the united states, let alone his elections. >> dagen: incredible. wallace then pressed putin on why many of his critics end up dead. watch this. >> why is it that so many people who are political enemies of vladimir putin are attacked? >> first of all, all of us have plenty of political rivals. i'm sure president trump has plenty of political rivals. >> but they don't end up dead. >> haven't presidents been killed in the united states?

>> dagen: your reaction? >> josh: first off, can we just acknowledge what a national treasure chris wallace is. what an incredible interview. when you think about the journalists who do this test, they always elicit some kind of emotion or nonverbal communication from the subject that confirms what they were trying to get at. vladimir putin is going to sit there and lie to you all day long. but you could tell based on the failure to pick up the papers, based on his current reaction to his political enemies discussio discussion, that stuff went right to the middle of what he's trying to hide from the american people and probably his own people, just a hats off. i can't say enough good things about that. >> dagen: it made putin look weak. and chris looked strong and by extension, i don't think i'm going overboard with this, it made the united states look strong. i think vladimir putin needs to be reminded your economy is smaller than the economy of

texas. and that was part of it. it was calling him out on his lies. >> harris: it was the brand of cost a mack rationing by chris wallace. he leans away and, something we know that he does at every venture. that's why we watch him. i would say this for putin oddly enough, a missed opportunity. and there he was, just finish with the president, he knows our president of the united states is getting some criticism at this point, and he makes error after error with chris wallace. it was interesting to watch. it was revealing in many counts. and maybe speaks to the issue of what the president is thinking in terms of negotiating now. he is also a master negotiator. >> trish: yeah. as were said behind the scenes, once again, this was a missed opportunity. thank you, chris. i think americans needed some

answers yesterday. they needed to see putin himself on full display and i think we got that. what was he trying to suggest? in that press conference and in the interview when he started talking about the assassination of jfk or martin luther king that he in fact was trying to sow the seeds of doubt and americans about our own system of government, about our very own democracy and i heard that at times during the press conference as well. this is not a good guy. >> harris: those are very revealing threatening words. >> dagen: trying to reinforce moral equivalency which you got in the press conference and i think there was pushed back because again, americans know that is hogwash. >> lisa: we know chris wallace is awesome at his job, he was the only presidential moderator

who is universally praised all around in his performance in a way that he handles the debates. we all know he is phenomenal at his job. what i thought was interesting is putin seem to kind of defend the hack and the release of the emails because he was basically saying they were true and he's also saying if democrats were meddling in their own process, it seemed like it was almost for the justification for the meddling and release. so he kind of seem to admit it. >> dagen: that's what chris wallace said to him. are you saying it's okay because the fact that they took from the dnc from john podesta was a real email so it's okay to hack and spread the information? >> harris: it's hard to believe that they are that into our politics. that's way down in there. >> josh: this is a kgb guy. but so fascinating about this is for somebody who studies the american politics as closely as vladimir putin did, he missed an awful lot when he agreed to do

an interview with chris. >> harris: that's what i was saying. i don't think he realized what he was up against. there is not going to be opportunities for vladimir putin in this interview. >> josh: he ran into a buzz saw and i think what you saw is telltale signs of people who don't have any arguments to make. got hit right in the middle of the forehead with the facts and have to figure out how to wriggle free. >> dagen: treated them like the ant time american murderer doing that he is. the 2020 election battle heating up. a new report that president trump's reelection campaign and to affiliated groups $90 million. it is a step up pressure on democrats to find a challenger to plus, new reaction to former fbi lawyer lisa page's deposition over anti-trump biases inside the justice department. some republicans saying her version of events conflicts with what fbi official peter strzok told lawmakers.

what that could mean for robert mueller's investigation. >> i do think she is trying to give us as much information as she is allowed to do. which i think is a distinction and a difference from what we saw with peter strzok. alright, i brought in new max protein

...to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. i'll take that. [cheers] 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. new ensure max protein. in two great flavors.

new ensure max protein. are you ready to take your then you need xfinity xfi.? a more powerful way to stay connected. it gives you super fast speeds for all your devices, provides the most wifi coverage for your home, and lets you control your network with the xfi app. it's the ultimate wifi experience. xfinity xfi, simple, easy, awesome.

>> lisa: welcome back. lisa page, the former fbi lawyer at the center of controversy over anti-trump bias in the agency wrapped up her closed-door interview with a joint house panel yesterday. pages in the hot seat over her anti-trump text messages with the embattled fbi official peter strzok. some g.o.p. lawmakers say that page was forthcoming and suggested the investigation may be growing. >> there are differences in her testimony and in many cases, she admits that the text messages as opposed to agent strzok, who thinks that we've all misinterpreted his own words on any text message that might be. >> we all learned a great deal of new information again today, so it's going to require us to do a whole lot of follow-up.

>> lisa: he says he doesn't see any evidence that it impacted the hillary email crowbar the start of the trump rush investigation. >> i personally thought the text messaging was unprofessional. it was unbecoming. it should never have been on a government phone. that being said, i don't see any indication that any views expressed in those x messages translated into bias. that is a question we should be asking, certainly inspector general horwitz came to the same conclusion. >> lisa: strzok testified earlier this month that he did not let his political opinions influence his work. do you spend on capitol hill. this congress using their oversight abilities and power effectively? >> josh: i think what you're seeing with lisa page is an example of how it should work. what you do is you compel testimony from people who have information to provide, they come in and provide a candid assessment, allows you to bring in other witnesses, examine the

facts on them and pulled at the end of the day, you probably have a conclusion you can rely on. what we've seen instead of that too often is what we saw with the strzok hearing which is a combination of somebody who is extremely invasive, intentionally confrontational coupled with the house of representatives on both the republican and democratic sides of that committee trying to make a circus out of it. and that is not. if that's the exact opposite of what you want because is not going to provide any conclusion. >> lisa: congressman mark meadows says he doesn't know if they're going to compel lisa page to testify openly in public, is that a mistake? >> dagen: think the american people not only deserve to hear from her and she certainly will be handled with friendlier gloves, softer gloves then strzok and lambaste peter strzok about the affair that he was having. i think the american people deserve to hear it all and to that point, during the peter strzok testimony, we found out

the justice department official was officially acting as a career of information to the fbi from fusion gps on the payroll of the clinton campaign where his wife worked. and that leads us to president trump, he would be criticized for this, declassify a whole host of documents including the fires application, the original application, also the 302, the information forms that include interview information that fbi agents did, there's a lot that could be and should be declassified because ultimately, if you want to improve the image of the fbi, we really need to know what was happening during the election. >> lisa: i agree, i think the president should get it all out there and here is the crux of the issue of the main concern is we obviously know there is bias at the fbi, look at the text messages, anyone with half a brain can see that. the crux of the issue and the question is, is it provable that that anti-trump bias had an impact? i would say yes, but is

approvable? >> harris: how would you prove it? >> lisa: exactly. >> harris: i think it's on peter strzok and lisa page to prove it. they were the ones sending the text messages and when i have talked with lawmakers recently, i'm wondering if that's not among their top two questions. can you prove that whatever you had planned to keep the president out of the white house wasn't unfolding even after you're out of your position? was as a wider conversation that was having to's is still being had? i have a lot of questions about protecting not just the trust of the american people in the fbi and doj but the actual part that demands that we trust them the way they do their job. how do you prove it? i don't know the answer to that. that something that should be a burden on the people writing the text messages. i would say this really quickly because i don't want to over talk and i want to hear from trish. at the end of the day, it would be great for the american people to see whatever they can see. but we aren't the ones who decide what accountability and punishment would look like. that's not left up to us. so they can show us less and do

more as far as i'm concerned. i do it, do whatever it takes to make sure this doesn't continue to happen whatever it was, however deep it went, whatever was colored by what they were texting back and forth. a member of their bosses names were in some of those texts. andrew mccabe, former deputy director. i'm done. >> lisa: does this have any impact on the mueller probe? >> trish: it should. if we get a lot of questions, we deserve some transparency. what bugs me is that vladimir putin is sort of getting what he wanted. look at the state we are in where we are saying we don't know if we can trust our government. and i think it's a real question, we don't know right now if we can trust our government. we don't know if we can trust the fbi, and when you think of this full circle, but a mere few got what he wanted because he hs to our very core. >> dagen: can lisa page prove that peter strzok lied in front of congress because again, for out of the very five guilty

pleas that mueller has gotten from individuals related to lying to investigators or lying to the fbi, so folks go to jail for that all the time and the wheel stop it, he didn't remember writing that text messages and i was referring to the american people, don't spit in my face and tell me it's raining. that's exactly what it felt like. and >> josh: i can't disagree with that. i think your point that's really important one, before we start engaging in the discussion about revealing our intel methods and sources and having a discussion in the open public about how we garner information and intel community, before we do that, we have to really ask the question that you asked which is what is lighting reviewed and trying to accomplish? in my mind, it doesn't get better than that. >> lisa: we're going to leave it there with those sober thoughts. just hours after the president summit with vladimir putin, a russian national busted in washington accused of trying to infiltrate political groups. if the suspect's reported attempts to get the president

and putin to meet and what this says about continued russian interference. if you're going to want to stay tuned. no matter who rides point, there are over 10,000 allstate agents riding sweep. call one today. are you in good hands?

if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable after just 4 months, ... with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques.

and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. tell your doctor if these occur. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. other side effects include upper respiratory tract infection and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ♪ otezla. show more of you.

>> harris: a fox news alert and we are learning the president will speak atop his meeting with lawmakers in the roosevelt room later today. 2:00 p.m. eastern, we are getting some details on what will happen there. there will be a cool opportunity, meaning the media via one representative of the media will be in there to gather what's happening at 2:00 p.m. eastern. we call that kind of a spray. the president's 2:00 p.m. meeting with members of congress will have that a top, he is expected to make remarks on his recent trip to helsinki, finland. let me put this in the context for you. members of his own party republicans are saying today, senators, that they may consider a resolution to make it very clear that america does in fact

see the intelligence as being true on russia meddling in our last presidential election. so with that, the president will make his remarks about helsinki. i would imagine there might be some interesting comments back and forth, don't know if we will be privy to that because the rest of the meetings after his remarks will be private. if members of congress who are expected to be in attendance, kevin brady of texas, chairman of the ways and means committee, representatives mike bishop, peter roskam, and eric paulson all there to talk next steps and tax cuts 2.0 is what they are talking about. so that dagan had said republicans will probably start to talk about the economy right now because they need to with them new things coming down the pipe. the president today 2:00 p.m. eastern, pop your corn, the day is made, we will move on. meanwhile, the same day as that summit, the justice department announced the arrest of a russian woman.

an fbi agent, a self described gun in three days to try to infiltrate gun organizations like nra and push moscow's agenda while on u.s. soil and that she sought to set up a back channel communications between the kremlin in u.s. politicians. this from the affidavits which were filed. "these lines could be used by the russian federation to penetrate the u.s. national decision-making apparatus, to advance the agenda. special counsel robert muller's probe as far as we know, the charges filed by justice department national security prosecutors." so this is kind of a sideline story now that hooked into the narrative of russia, whatever that seems to be at whatever hour. >> josh: i don't know if we needed more proof that russia has a really robust and very significant espionage operation underway in the united states and has four decades. this is not the first, the first

in the last few years, this is ongoing. and this is clearly a threat that we face at all levels of government and is not just the russians. they've been trying to do the same thing. anytime you can bring somebody out in press charges, that's a good thing. but nobody should have any mistake about what kind of intentions the russians have with respect to the american government. >> harris: save got these organizations inside the united states like the nra, what you say? >> dagen: this is a russian individual, according to the affidavit used to arrest her, she was being led or directed by a russian official who was identified in the press as alexander, he's a deputy central bank governor, he was sanctioned in april. so what does this administration do? we've been hard on president trump and his performance yesterday but what this administration has been doing is keeping sanctions in

place, adding additional sanctions. there are more than three dozen russian individuals including cronies of vladimir putin that sanctions have been on, also much larger multinational corporations, but there's a lot of pressure that was that still putting. >> lisa: was not present the existence of spies is something new. go back to 2010, the operation where they found ten russian spies and expelled, and a chatman was a name that was most reported. also woman named cynthia murphy who posed yourself as an accountant trying to get into hillary clinton's inner circle and secretary of state to what we should do the united states government is charge her, deport her, get her out of here and go after anyone else spying on the united states and trying to hurt the government. >> harris: how concerned should we be, what kind of pushback to be put on when our own organizations are being sought after? this is not political, these aren't politicians are going after, the going after u.s. organizations.

>> trish: i think you have to be somewhat fearful about the world in which we live right now. not just the russians, but the chinese as well. do not forget about the chinese and their efforts to spy on us and to influence us. we need to know who we are, and one of the problems right now is we don't. you have so much political bickering and it's time that everybody come together and recognize that the threat is outside the united states and we need to stick together and make sure that we are on a same page when dealing with russia. >> dagen: how about if someone sounds like a boris or natosha, don't talk to them, don't let them inside your organization. >> harris: we got the bottom line they're pulling together. i heard in a i thought. house minority leader nancy pelosi possibly losing more support from her fellow democrats. can she? has it been looking good. she continues to make her case for speaker of the house.

should her political party win the chamber? whether the defection will bring a fresh face or further divide the democrats. we will talk about it, stay close. let's take a look at some numbers:

4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom... is a stroke. 80 percent of all strokes and heart disease? preventable. and 149 dollars is all it takes to get screened and help take control of your health. we're life line screening... and if you're over 50... call this number, to schedule an appointment... for five painless screenings that go beyond regular check-ups. we use ultrasound technology to literally look inside your arteries... for plaque which builds up as you age- and increases your risk for stroke and cardiovascular disease.

and by getting them through this package, you're saving over 50%. so call today and consider these numbers: for just $149 you'll receive five screenings that could reveal what your body isn't telling you. i'm gonna tell you that was the best $150 i ever spent in my life. life line screening. the power of prevention. call now tow to learn more.

>> dagen: more and more of our fellow democrats are distancing themselves from house leader nancy pelosi and she loves to secure the votes to become speaker of the house. if democrats take back the chamber from the republicans in the upcoming midterm elections. two democratic house candidates in california declining to commit to voting for her should they win the races.

as the ten term congressman joe crowley of new york when he was asked about it on sunday, this on top of about 20 other democratic lawmakers are candidates who have publicly said they would not support her. lisa boothe, she is still ranking in the money. she has raised nearly 70 million this election cycle breaking her own previous record in my she still the minority leader. >> lisa: to sell a liability to democrats. i was part of it in 2010 team in elections and we had so many ads that tied candidates to nancy pelosi. he looked at the georgia six special election, now nancy pelosi being someone who is in leadership for a while doesn't care, she is a telling democrat candidates, do what you need to do to win so in instances where they disavow her, it's difficult to use her against those individuals. that being said, back in 2016, had more defectors than she had seen in a decade so maybe this continues to grow and

potentially she gets unseated. >> dagen: the people are worried about in their own party of this, putting this mood, giving bonuses to people because of tax reform crumbs and then doubling down a tripling down on it. they were afraid of that being a commercial that somebody cuts in the midterm. >> josh: she's long been a liability for democrats and not because they believe in exactly what they said. they all believe it's crumbs and they all believe in open borders and abolish ice and impeaching president trump and reversing all of the tax cuts. that is uniform in the democratic party these days. with different is the democratic party is undergoing a full-fledged civil war and we saw play out in joe crowley's district, was out last week in california when the democratic party endorsed a left-wing ideologue over the democratic icon in dianne feinstein in california. it is playing out in cities and

localities all across this country as the most underplayed story in politics. we read and heard about for ten years to the public and civil war. guess what, democrats are having one end is far worse than republicans ever have. >> trish: this is what is very alarming for our company is that there is a socialist arm of the democratic party that was started via bernie sanders and you saw what happened in crowley's district and that is catching on the way that is not healthy for anyone. so we should be cognizant of that. nancy pelosi, her time has come and gone. the crumbs, it is a great example. it's one thing after another and so she's increasingly this san francisco elitist that represents the past and i think the democratic party needs to focus very hard and going back. donald trump has taken those routes. if you think about those

blue-collar workers, those union workers in places like pennsylvania. >> josh: they can't get back. if you look at energy within the democratic party, all people are showing up in those primaries across the country. these are socialists. >> harris: there is for all of those in democratic party. show me where socialism works. >> josh: great question. but when will it be socialism and how exactly does that work? where is it successful? >> dagen: it doesn't work. that's a commercial that you're going to see is what happened in venezuela quite frankly and by the way, they think nancy pelosi and her ilk think they make better decisions than you do with your own money. at the end of it. 2020 seems like a long way off. president's reelection team is not wasting any time. it has raised a boatload of money already.

and the president says he doesn't think any democratic candidate can beat him. we debated next. in-laws were coming, a little bit of water, it really- it rocked our world. i had no idea the amount of damage that water could do. we called usaa. and they greeted me as they always do. sergeant baker, how are you? they were on it. it was unbelievable. having insurance is something everyone needs, but having usaa- now that's a privilege. we're the baker's and we're usaa members for life. usaa. get your insurance quote today. discover our largest variety of crab and crab dishes all year! like new crabfest combo. your one chance to have new jumbo snow crab with tender dungeness crab. or try crab lover's dream. sweet, juicy king crab and jumbo snow crab cozied up with crab linguini alfredo. even our shrimp is crab-topped!

so hurry in and get your butter-dunkin' game on! 'cause crabfest will be gone in a snap. and now bring home the seafood you crave with red lobster to go. call or order online today. you crave with red lobster to go. and when youod sugar is a replace one meal... choices. ...or snack a day with glucerna... ...made with carbsteady... ...to help minimize blood sugar spikes... ...you can really feel it. now with 30% less carbs and sugars. glucerna. i've been making blades here at gillette for 20 years. there's a lot of innovation that goes into making america's #1 shave. precision machinery and high-quality materials from around the world. nobody else even comes close. now starting at $7.99. gillette. the best a man can get.

speaking massive fund-raising holes, the commission shows a trend campaign to raise nearly $90 million since the start of 2017. a whole lot of that money is coming from two joint fund-raising committees allied with the republican party and the trump reelection campaign. in a recent interview, the president saying he is planning on running for reelection in 2020 and he doesn't see much competition from democrats. watch. all right. this is what he said in a recent interview. he is going to run, he said to you. do you believe him? >> josh: absolutely he's going to run and he's going to win. all these national elections, they were a choice. it's between in this case president trump or the alternative in the democratic party in the alternative in the democratic party thus far, let's review what it is that they are saying. if you talk about elizabeth warren, kamala harris, cory booker, this has been a race to the left likes of which

we have never seen before. they are literally out in the open promoting full open borders policy. that's just fine, everybody agrees on that. a full socialist agenda coupled with higher taxes on everybody. this does not compete nationwide. in a center of the election, at the center of this country feels more distant to that message than anything else. they do the country likes the idea of lower taxes and a better economy and the idea of having a job. >> harris: the country that now has been raking in crumbs to make a cake. some families and some households are able to do so much with the tax money that's coming in, the corporations, we continue to watch them pass on bonuses for their employees and create jobs as trish was saying. so now would socialism require that we give everything back? i'm going to guess that's not going to be popular.

speak to anybody was out there working for a living and trying to say for their future doesn't like the idea of their money going to support everybody else who isn't working. let me share that quote from the interview. he sat down with piers morgan on air force one and here's what he said, i don't see anybody. this is regarding anybody out there running against him. i know them all and i don't see anybody emma they do not have the right candidate. do you agree? >> lisa: i don't think we know because ultimately whether going to have a super crowded field like republicans did in 2016 and i think that kamala harris and cory booker might be relevant because you have some sort of dark horse candidate that comes up the middle splitting the ticket. i think we're going to end up seeing phases you never predicted. >> josh: i will eat my shoe is the craziest person doesn't emerge. i will eat it.

>> dagen: he historically has had trouble raising money. trump didn't need money to win. >> harris: "outnumbered," more of it in a moment. stay hungry. ask a business advir how to get on demand tech support for as little as $15 a month. right now, buy one hp ink and get a second at 30% off at office depot officemax essential for the cactus, but maybe not for people with rheumatoid arthritis. because there are options. like an "unjection™". xeljanz xr. a once-daily pill for adults with moderate to severe ra for whom methotrexate did not work well enough. xeljanz xr can reduce pain, swelling and further joint

damage, even without methotrexate. xeljanz xr can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections, lymphoma and other cancers have happened. don't start xeljanz xr if you have an infection. tears in the stomach or intestines, low blood cell counts and higher liver tests and cholesterol levels have happened. your doctor should perform blood tests before you start and while taking xeljanz xr, and monitor certain liver tests. tell you doctor if you were in a region where fungal infections are common and if you have had tb, hepatitis b or c, or are prone to infections. needles. fine for some things. but for you, one pill a day may provide symptom relief. ask your doctor about xeljanz xr. an "unjection™".

>> thank you josh holmes, you are a very summary suit. >> well i have to be seen on a couch full of bright colors.

>> i can't wait to see what president trump has to say. 2:00 p.m. that's my shameless plug. >> it will be interesting. talk about the economy. josh, great to see you. and ladies, as always. take it away, and harris. >> harris: president trump expected to talk about his trip to helsinki before reporters within the next hour. this after facing criticism from both sides of the political aisle. this is "outnumbered overtime" and i'm harris faulkner. the white house as we will hear from the president of top the next hour. he will be hosting lawmakers at the white house. criticizing him for not calling out vladimir putin. a break with u.s. intelligence officials and the justice department. the president is defending his remarks in a sit down with our own sean hannity. watch it. >> president trump: he said there was no collusion whatsoever. i guess he said as strongly as you