tv The Five FOX News September 18, 2018 2:00pm-3:00pm PDT
2:00 pm
a few months later. by the time we got there, everyone had given up hope. look at what's happened since. a reminder how much we can do if we just have faith that we can do it. "the five" is next. ♪ >> jesse: i am jesse watters with dr. nicole safire, juan williams, dana perino, and greg gutfeld. it's 5:00 in new york city, this is "the five" ." a major senate showdown over if america will hear from both supreme court nominee bret, and his accuser. senate republicans setting hearing for next monday. democrats are making new demands. they want more time, witnesses to testify, and for the fbi to investigate the 36-year-old allegation. president trump reacting to it all earlier. >> you don't wait until the
2:01 pm
hearing is over and all of a sudden bring it up. senator feinstein sat with judge kavanaugh for a long period of time. a long, long meeting. why didn't she bring it up? why didn't she bring it up then? why didn't the democrats bring it up? because they obstruct and resist. that is the name of their campaign against me. they are lousy on policy and in many ways they are lousy politicians but they are very good on obstruction. we should go to the process. there shouldn't be a little dull. >> jesse: trading blows over how this process is playing out. >> it's disturbing to think about the way in which this has developed right at the end. it's pretty obvious this is all about delaying the process. >> we cannot continue the victimization and the smearing of someone like dr. ford. she is under no obligation to
2:02 pm
participate. >> it wouldn't find ourselves, nor would dr. ford find yourself in a situation if senator feinstein hadn't sat on this letter she has had since july. >> i think the nomination should be withdrawn. he has raised serious doubts about his credibility. >> jesse: so far, republicans say lawyers for christine blasey ford have not responded to their invitation for her to testify. mark judge, the other person alleged to be in the room, says he doesn't remember the incident or the party and will not testify. before we get into the political stuff, i want to ask the doctor a question. the memory situation. tell me what you think about this as it relates to a professional. she doesn't really recall how she got to the party. she doesn't recall the house the party was thrown in and she doesn't recall how she got home from the party. she is a little fuzzy about the people that were there at the
2:03 pm
time and there is some discrepancy with the notes her therapist took. she admits she was drinking. with that said, she believes and i believe she believes something happened that night. what role does memory play in the passage of time and an allegation this serious? >> nicole: it's a great question. psychologist, psychiatrists. it's a well-known fact people, when something dramatic happens, something that happened a long time ago, when you are in the room and they deliver news. you don't miss telling them of the details of the facts. not a fully formed frontal lobe and alcohol and add 36 years, details can get muddied a little bit. do i believe something happened to dr. ford and her adolescence? absolutely. i don't think anyone is ready to deny that. i think the party of bill clinton and keith ellison,
2:04 pm
trying to lecture america that we need to have a potentially politically motivated allegation should derail an entire process. we want to ask questions, get answers. she doesn't have the answers. so it's going to go into a he said-she said. >> juan: she said she can't remember some of the details. he says, of a party that nobody remembers the details, that he wasn't there. that's not logical. wait a second. nobody knows exactly where the party took place and you don't remember being there. that didn't make sense. >> greg: that is the trick. you can't blame. if you say you did this to me. i can't tell you when or where because then if i do, you might be able to say i wasn't there and that wasn't me. you leave it intentionally vague. >> juan: i would say that never happened. he also said i wasn't there. that's the problem in my mind.
2:05 pm
>> jesse: took out the point is having watch this before in my life, i just think it's proper to say it's very difficult, given what dr. saphier is saying about memory. it's difficult for people been traumatized in her to come forward in the first place and know they're going to be pilloried. she is in the arena right now. you could not be more at the mountaintop with arrows flying from every direction. >> greg: there is a difference between skepticism and pilloried. if everyone can go on social media and condemn something, people can go on social media and question something. even like senator blumenthal, he should know better about the fallibility of memory. this is a guy who sincerely, i will give him that, believes he went to vietnam. but he actually didn't go. we changed our memories. i sent yesterday, our memory is
2:06 pm
play-doh. but it goes both ways. her memory has gaps, and so could his. something has to be reported when it happens. this is the problem. you can't, relying on something that happened three and half decades ago in the court of public opinion means everything the human being on the planet is vulnerable to this. >> jesse: democrats say they want the fbi to go back and investigate this but the fbi has said this isn't really something we do. this is something local law enforcement would do. what is the play here next? >> dana: if you want to learn more about the fbi piece, kimberley strassel of "the wall street journal" had a series of tweets explaining the fbi's jurisdiction, israel, and how does background checks. six of them on brett kavanaugh on the last 15 years. not ever come up before. this is not a jurisdictional issue for them. would've been local law enforcement. democrats are saying that the fbi needs to reopen it. the fbi sang what we would do? senators have said will have
2:07 pm
another hearing. we'll do it monday. brett kavanaugh says i'm anxious to clear my name. they still have heard from dr. forwards lawyers or from her as to whether she will show. senators also said you don't have to do it in an open hearing. we can do it as a closed session. you won't have to worry about this idea that you are going to be paraded around and there will be some kind of circus. i'm curious about, senator hirono, democrat from hawaii, she said dr. ford is under no obligation to prove anything. she doesn't have to say anything. well, why then is the burden of proof on brett kavanaugh? if it is on him, let him testify. if she doesn't come, i think they do it they can to try to get the information and if the democrats decide they're going to vote against him which they already said they were going to, call the vote. >> juan: orrin hatch says he doesn't believe her. i think that's premature. i think in most cases like this, let's try to step away from the politics.
2:08 pm
if there was such an incident, and assault, typically would have somebody from the local police, special victims, go in there and try to figure out what actually took place. so in this situation, i think it cries out, given all the political static in the air, for someone to say here's what we were able to discern by talking to people, . >> dana: that's what a hearing, closed or open -- >> juan: i met some law enforcement people. >> jesse: what did what would y say 36 years later? >> dana: they don't even know the year. >> juan: i thought they did know the year. she was 15 and he was 17. >> dana: they are iffy on the year. >> jesse: the statute of limitations have we expired, so i don't think you could even prosecute a crime if there were a crime. >> juan: it's not about prosecution. >> jesse: if you were to look at that way.
2:09 pm
>> nicole: this is a guilty until proven innocent. >> dana: what are we supposed to do? say okay, there's an accusation that something happened but we don't all the details and therefore no one is allowed to go forward? >> nicole: you can't prove or disprove it. >> dana: jonathan turley said the tie goes to the accuser. he said-she said. the tie goes to the accuser. is that the new standard? >> greg: there's a certain kind of public display going on where people are saying if it is he said-she said, it must always be she said. if that's the case, we don't need courts. we can do a priority of innocence on what group is more innocent in the other and get rid of courts. this is about winning for a party. at any cost. the cost is perhaps ruining a life. i saw a headline. i won't say words from. the headline was "are republicans really going to nominate an accused to overturn
2:10 pm
roe?" imagine if this was your son, dad, her brother. we often think about victims but would you characterize this as fair without -- with the knowledge we have right now? is it fair to characterize somebody that way if that's your husband coming her brother, son, our father. i think sometimes, well, all the time in politics, we don't think that when we will ruin some of his life just so we can get somebody on the court. >> nicole: in the need to era, this is become more common. >> juan: historically women say men, you don't get us. you don't hear it. don't listen to it. then you get this cultural surge. i thought with anita hill and i'm seeing it again, it's a different era but again, do we as men listen? do we here? it's very difficult because this is about -- greg says it's about
2:11 pm
one side winning. you could reverse it and say republicans want to get this out of the way. >> nicole: how can you hear if they're not willing to come and talk? >> juan: you raise an important part. she willing to testify? we thought she was, now we don't know. >> greg: just because you are skeptical doesn't mean you aren't listening. i've said this before. i believe something happened but i believe memories having an effect, either with him or her. >> jesse: the whole world was going to be listening monday because it's going to be one for the history books. president trump sang what we called the witch hunt will be exposed by key russian documents. you will hear from him personally next. ♪motorcycle revving ♪ motorcycle revving ♪motorcycle revving
2:12 pm
2:13 pm
2:14 pm
i'm all about my bed. this mattress is dangerously comfortable. when i get in, i literally say ahh. introducing the leesa mattress. a better place to sleep. the leesa mattress is designed to provide strong support, relieve pressure and optimize airflow to keep you cool. read our reviews, then try the leesa mattress in your own home. order during our extended labor day mattress sale and save. for a limited time get 150 dollars off and free shipping too. sale prices are available right now. go to buyleesa.com today. you need this bed.
2:15 pm
♪ >> i want total transparency. this is a witch hunt. republicans are seeing it. democrats are knowing it's a witch hunt too but they don't want to admit it because it's not good politics for them. it's a terrible witch hunt and it's hurt our country. they will see things have been found over the last couple weeks about text messages back and
2:16 pm
forth are a disgrace to our nation. >> juan: president trump defending his decision to declassify key fisa court documents and text matches mes. democrats say they could create national security risks. >> it is laughable they are saying this is going to endanger national security. you've heard me say this. this is really full transparency for the american people. >> important sources an important precedent of protecting those sources may be violated by this president who cares little about -- >> juan: it's not clear to us when exactly these documents will be released. release, apparently they will b be. >> dana: this is something the president has the power to do. he can declassify anything. there is a responsible way to declassify things and that's to have the process, as you can see
2:17 pm
behind us on the big board, if you need to protect somebody's identity that's not involved, that should be protected, you can cross out their name and have it redacted. there's four basic areas. one would be the fisa court and what was used to go to the fisa court. was it accurate? we might find out about more. you get a renewal of -- find out about the renewal application. every 90 days, you have to go back and prove to the court i need this to continue because the activity i'm concerned about is ongoing. that's why it gets renewed. there are also the page and strzok text messages. what i'm really interested in is the piece about bruce ohr. bruce ohr was meeting with -- christopher steele. he was talking to, bruce ohr was talking to christopher steele. he was decommissioned. as i understand it, he was
2:18 pm
operating outside of his lane and meeting with somebody that the fbi had decommissioned. why would you do that? is it inappropriate? he has his own investigation ongoing. remember that in the midst of all this, there is the department of justice inspector general report that is ongoing. in some ways, the president is, i understand he is dropping at the bait and he wants us out there to clear his name. this is getting a little bit ahead of this process. democrats are complaining it's not complete and could be dangerous. i think the fbi doj will be very careful about protecting people's identity. >> juan: jesse, what you are hearing from people like mark warner, senate intelligence committee, democrat, is that the president is essentially using his power to pursue a political vendetta. >> jesse: i think he is counteracting a political vendetta against himself and his campaign. i want to take a moment. dana perino, that was such an
2:19 pm
articulate and thoughtful analysis of the deep state. usually, you know, i can hear you rolling your eyes when i get into the nellie ohr and bruce ohr. but what a great synopsis. >> dana: you can be thoughtful and not have to resort to name-calling. >> jesse: i will start calling some names then. this this is a big abuse of pow. the fact that they spied unconstitutionally on an american and then the narrative gets outcome of this narrative gets out that there was this big collusion and now you have a special counsel. it's incredibly frustrating. what they did was they paid a guy to go to anonymous russian intelligence horses and whisper things and then he gives it to bruce ohr and then it trickles up and then they all of a sudden slap a fisa warrant on an innocent american and listen to his phone calls and look at his emails for one full year.
2:20 pm
at the end of the year, there's never been a charge levied against carter page. they found nothing. they have been trying to cover their tracks for this last year and a half because they know this never would have come out if hillary clinton were elected. that was the game plan they should've given the trump campaign, if they really cared about russian interference, a briefing in the spring but instead they spied. a lot of these spies were western intelligence officials. the whole thing reeks and i'm happy the president is being transparent. i feel bad for the ig. he wanted the report to get out there. >> juan: before hurricane dana blows this way -- >> dana: i am all smiles. >> juan: peter king, congress from from new york, says the president here wants to reveal that there was no basis for the fisa warrant itself, no basis at all. i'm thinking, now you're going after the fisa judges because
2:21 pm
the judges approved this repeatedly. what do you think? >> nicole: is the average american is going to agree with me because i'm not a political pundit or expert in any of this but what i see here from a bird's-eye view that there is concern over, as jesse was saying, spying on an american. carter page specifically. i want to know was a just political opposition motivation has caused the doj to spy on americans? i'm concerned text messages, the one that said it's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event, talking about if trump were to gain presidency. i want to know what they are talking about. is there a behind the scenes moved to undermine our current administration and not going to able to do much if these fisa documents are released. i will look at them and hand them to dana perino and she can interpret them. at least i know there's going to be some transparency. i don't think we are going to be putting america endanger.
2:22 pm
they will keep names an end thing that needs to remain classified classified. >> juan: i would go to an above average american, greg gutfeld. >> greg: not by height. wouldn't it -- if we found out that carter page was a super awesome deadly assassin. he is such a dork. i know him. he's a nice guy. what happened if it turned out -- it's kind of unfair. how long can you find somebody without charging them. it's a good question. this has to be the first time in my life that i've seen journalists not wanting access to information. they used to love leaks and memos. national security be. now all of a sudden they're worried about the danger. to trump's credit, he is the pyrex potus. most transparent.
2:23 pm
the prescient love that. he's your neighbor who never draws his curtains. >> dana: i have one of those. >> greg: i do too. >> greg: sometimes he wished he would. >> jesse: i am one of those. >> greg: i want to change my name to redacted. wouldn't that be great? i want to be known as redacted. >> dana: okay. >> greg: they are yelling at me as though i talk too much. >> juan: my worry about the pyrex is that when i put hot water in it, i think it's going to boil over and burned me. i think that's a little bit of what's happening here with his revelation. a new study reveals that negative word most used by the media when covering president trump. gregory fills you in next on "the five" ." i can't believe it.
2:25 pm
no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on my car insurance with geico. cool, huh? yeah. he plays football, huh? yeah. believe it. geico could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. this is a story about mail and packages. and it's also a story about people. people who rely on us every day to deliver their dreams they're handing us more than mail they're handing us their business and while we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, we never forget... that your business is our business the united states postal service. priority: you ♪ jushis local miracle ear t at helped andrew hear more of the joy in her voice. just one hearing test is all it took for him to hear more of her laugh... and less of the background noise around him.
2:26 pm
for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter. just one free hearing test could help you hear more... laughter...music...life... call now for your free hearing test from an industry leader: miracle-ear. this is frank. sup! this is frank's favorite record. this is frank's dog. and this is frank's record shop. frank knowns northern soul, but how to set up a limited liability company... what's that mean? not so much. so he turned to his friends at legalzoom. yup! they hooked me up. we helped with his llc, contracts, and some other stuff that's part of running a business. so frank can focus on the beat. you hear that? this is frank's record shop. and this is where life meets legal.
2:27 pm
billions of problems. morning breath? garlic breath? stinky breath? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath fresh breath oral rinse instantly fights all types of bad breath and works for 24 hours. so you can... breathe easy. there's therabreath at walmart. we are the tv doctors of america, and we may not know much about medicine, but we know a lot about drama. we also know that you can avoid drama by getting an annual check-up. so go, know, and take control of your health. it could save your life. cigna. together, all the way. ♪
2:28 pm
>> greg: it's true, the person thinks donald trump is start grading mad. the media research center in congo the words reporters used to describe trump and found he was angry 23 times, furious 17 times, outraged eight times, he was also venting, infuriated, livid, erupting, lashing out, on a tirade. the good news: no spontaneous combustion. that's for after the midterms. so why the language? the guy with a finger on that famous button. absent eight any harmful deeds from trump and faced with optimism about america, the media is like a pack of cats. oh to create a story that fits their own infuriating are bulging narrative. they traffic and workplace rumors, the stuff that exists in all offices since the beginning of cubicles. even jesus dressed down his apostles. but trump is no jimmy carter. thank god. who would you rather have?
2:29 pm
now trump's bombastic but most bosses are. they use their voice like an instrument, as a call to action to wake up the slackers, to get the team to do actual work. that voice is in there to soothe the concerned or troubled souls in the beanie. it's always about the media. they are like ignored teens. they hate the new guy who is making them work for their shrinks and drinks. they need someone who makes the billboard by echoing there phoning virtues. after obama, the media got so flabby, they should think trump. he is the one who put them on a pressroom diet where they eat nothing but their own words. >> dana: [laughs] >> greg: anyway. let's just go to break. i'm kidding. i'm joking. dana, you made this point. when they talked about, when president obama will get mad, described as fiery. >> dana: fiery as a complement.
2:30 pm
the thing is with president trump, he's not borin boring. you know you have to figure out a way to make something interesting, exciting. why would somebody click on that, while they buy it? for president obama, if he was fiery, that was a good thing because it is finally going to get out there and show those republicans. if he was frustrated, it was because republicans were obstructionists. if he was, the worst thing ever said about him was that he was testy or irritated. that was the worst. >> greg: the birth certificate thing was pretty bad. [laughter] jesse. this is my favorite. this is my favorite. it was just a joke. >> nicole: it took me a minute minute. >> greg: the president, lashing out. he was lashing out 53 times. that's almost, i can't do math. it's a lot.
2:31 pm
>> jesse: if the media was calling me a racist, mentally ill coder, and they were reading my lawyers offices, i would be lashing out. i don't think these networks have the type of sources that would tell you what the president's mind-set is in the oval office. i look back at when bill clinton was under investigation by special counsel, the press called him resilient. energized, invigorated. strategizing. passionate. i really tells you more the additives they use about the media that about the person they are describing. the media calls me smarmy, sarcastic, all kinds of awful things. when nonpartisan, real fair and balanced media describe me, they say i'm handsome, insightful, funny. it just depends on where it's coming from. >> greg: but your mom said those other things.
2:32 pm
it's true, what jesse is saying. juan, if they follow me around, they would sell that i yell constantly and then i'm grumpy all the time. i see nonsense songs and i mutter to myself. these are all accurate descriptions. >> juan: they do a better job with youth and they do with my man jesse. i don't know why. it's not fair to jesse. to me, there are too many sources. even if you read conservative media, they say this president can be volatile and impulsive praise unpredictable. so i don't know. to me, when you have him described as fire and fury or fear or unhinged. i think these are book titles. gee, there's a lot of people saying this. >> greg: three people. and many of them are liars. lying liars. liars, leakers, and liberals.
2:33 pm
>> juan: flippers. >> greg: dr. saphier, is there something psychologically wrong with the press? >> nicole: i get the psychological questions. >> dana: she is not a psychologist. >> nicole: the problem i have with this verbiage as it encourages single-minded certainty in the closes all sorts of compromise. ask anyone i work with. i've even killed all day long until i'm faced with incompetency. at that point, i get upset. i'm not throwing tantrums but you noy am upset. the press calls president trump angry 185 times since january 1. you note, he deals with incompetency every day and everything he campaigned on, there obstructionists in the way, health care, the wall. we don't have all day. but he's frustrated that's why he's angry. >> dana: i think you might like to be described differently but if he weren't described in
2:34 pm
these ways, he wouldn't be getting done what he said he wants to get done. >> juan: you know how i'd describe it? stable genius. >> dana: vary. >> greg: up next. >> roseanne was canceled by herself but picked up by white nationalists. >> greg: jokes from the emmy awards are getting a lot of attention. highlights next. what makes this simple salad
2:35 pm
2:38 pm
♪ ♪ >> dana: the 70th prime time emmy awards were held last night. it didn't take long for the show to turn political. here are some of the highlights that have everyone buzzing. >> roseanne was canceled by herself. but picked up by white nationalists. the obamas have their own production deal at netflix.
2:39 pm
my dream is that the only thing they produce his or her own version of "the apprentice." and it gets way higher ratings. >> my mother is not watching. she says she doesn't like watching white awards shows because you don't thank jesus enough. the only white people whose saying jesus are republicans nx crack heads. >> dana: the rating sinking down 10% from last year. there is someone at this table named redacted who watched? >> greg: i did. i don't see, i thought it was a fairly benign show for the first 90 minutes. we spent a lot of time calling people snowflakes, because they can't take words. if you have a problem with this, then you're officially a snowflake.
2:40 pm
i think that the michael che joke was an insult at the emmys. people think he mentioned jesus, that he was making fun of christianity. he was doing the opposite. he was saying his mom doesn't watch white awards shows because no one there thanks jesus. he was knocking this group as a homogenous group who doesn't thank jesus. he says the only people who thank jesus are republicans and ex-crackheads. he is saying that you people out there don't -- those of only. other people thank jesus but that joke was directed that audience. >> dana: did you watch it?
2:41 pm
>> jesse: i didn't. i read a book and watched hannity. television right now is never been so good. there is quality television everywhere. it's strange when they have awards shows about these great tv shows, it will change the channel or don't watch. they like watching the shows, they don't like listening to the actors be political. i agree with greg. i thought some of those jokes are pretty funny. i would've deliberated a little bit differently but i haven't been invited yet. >> dana: one of these days. juan. >> juan: i didn't watch it, that's for sure. i would rather watch the actual shows. >> jesse: you would rather watch hannity. >> dana: just say yes. >> juan: i am getting ready for laura ingraham. i get the popcorn. when i was going to say to greg, i think you're right.
2:42 pm
i think to my mind, he was saying black people would be thanking jesus. i think it went beyond that. i think it really spoke to that idea of who it is that will do something as daring as acknowledge their faith in public. >> greg: you're exactly right. that's when i was trying to say. it's a very politically incorrect thing to say i think on his part. i thought it was kind of brave. it was a little risky. >> dana: do you like to watch any of the shows? >> nicole: i stopped watching awards shows a few years ago. i'm not interested the hollywood people having so much influence over the public. a lot of these actors and entertainers, they are not educated but they have a huge fan base so they go off because they have this fan base. i really appreciate intelligent conversation, so if you are not backing it up with the education
2:43 pm
and facts. >> dana: do know what's a great awards show? country music awards. >> greg: a lot of people are criticizing this he didn't it. i watch it. this was the most benign. if you can handle a few jabs, what's your problem? >> juan: what is wrong with "the five" today? what's going on? you're supposed to attack the hollywood elite. >> greg: enough of that. i do that four times a week. >> dana: a new study says there's only four personality types. which category does "the five" fit in? were going to find out about greg next. . rowe price . rowe price our experts go beyond the numbers to examine investment opportunities firsthand. like e-commerce spurring cardboard demand. the pursuit of allergy-free peanuts.
2:44 pm
and mobile payment reaching new markets. this is strategic investing. because your investments deserve the full story. t.rowe price. invest with confidence. if you're waiting patiently for a liver transplant, it could cost you your life. it's time to get out of line with upmc. at upmc, living-donor transplants put you first. so you don't die waiting. upmc does more living-donor liver transplants than any other center in the nation. find out more and get out of line today.
2:47 pm
♪ >> nicole: you may have noticed "the five" hosts have a wide variety of personalities. scientists say we can narrow it down to four. average, reserved, self-centered, role models. good news, they can change over time. all right, so we've already know that there are five personality traits. many people have taken this questionnaire. they have an idea of where they sit. now we have a new study that's
2:48 pm
taking those traits and has narrowed people down into four main personality types. so i have carefully decided what i think you are. not a psychologist. however, for the fun of the show, and the study, for me, i like average. average tends to be, they are extroverted but a little bit neurotic, meaning they have their emotional highs and lows. a lot of times people tend to grow out of that. i think dana may be when she was younger, definitely me, i was average when i was younger but i've grown into a role model. i think dana is a role model which means she's extroverted, openness, agreeable, conscientious but she's not neurotic. a little bit more even keel. juan, i would like juan to be reserved, agreeable conscientious and also emotionally stable. >> dana: do you think he's emotionally stable? >> nicole: greg and jesse, you
2:49 pm
are tough. i will tell you i go back and forth between her greg, i like average. and i want to go a little bit self-centered. the only reason i say that is you are obviously extroverted. you are not necessarily agreeable. that goes with self-centered. but i find you a little neurotic a little bit. you are between average and self-centered for me. jesse, it's being told in my ear that you are self-centered. >> jesse: the producer set i was self-centered in an endearing way. >> greg: do you know what this is? it's like the astrology garbage. when you go and you see, you read your astrological sign and it goes oh, you are agreeable, you take risks. you are loving, yet reserved. and then you realize you read the wrong astrology sign but you agreed with it. because they use generic phrases so you can say hey, i am reserved but i'm also a role model. >> jesse: that's what i
2:50 pm
capricorn would say. >> nicole: do you think that me saying what i think you are would change some of your behaviors or make you kind of fit? >> dana: you said role model. according to me, that's the best thing you could be on here. >> greg: see what i mean? >> nicole: they do say you can change. >> dana: i do think i don't think i'm as extroverted as some people think i am and part of it, i learn from people here, especially going from government work to a television, that a lot of people are more energized when they go on television and they leave and they are energized, they are excited. i'm the opposite. it takes a lot for me to bring the energy to the show and then i need to -- >> greg: tell me about it. >> dana: i know. >> greg: i'm joking. >> dana: no, it's true. you've helped me with that. >> jesse: don't upset her. >> nicole: my reserved juan, emotionally stable, reserved juan. do you think people jump into these different categories throughout the day during different life events.
2:51 pm
do you think someone forms characteristics and that's how they stay question i >> juan: i think it will have to address. i think successful people manage it. if you want to be a leader, i think even if you are an introvert and i can be very introverted at times we have to understand that when you're in a social group or when you're in a challenge, you have to step up, so you teach yourself how to do it. people who are successful at that, it may come across to some as the they are extroverts. but i think in fact they can be learned skills. by the way, i signed the paper the other day an essay about who doesn't get into college in america, the most discriminated against group, introverts. >> dana: they create the biggest companies, most successful companies. >> juan: they are disproportionately artists and thinkers. the creative class. >> jesse: sometimes i wish you were a little bit more introverted, juan. >> juan: i know. i think of you as my rainbow,
2:52 pm
jesse. >> jesse: i am your role model. >> juan: you are my role model because you are so pushy. >> nicole: sum it up, do you think we are accurately characterized? >> jesse: i think you nailed it. i'm not going to second-guess you. dana is definitely a rule follower. on time for appointments. you are probably early for appointments. >> dana: always. >> jesse: and gutfeld is neurotic. sometime juan is moody. let's not let juan off here. sometimes he comes in and these okay and he lasted all of our jokes and sometimes he's angry. today he's in a great mood. >> nicole: thanks for playing. "one more thing" is up next. f b♪ ♪ meet george jetson. ♪
2:53 pm
♪ his boy elroy. with instant acceleration, electric cars are more fun to drive and more affordable than ever. electric cars are here. plug into the present. in your wireless mouse? maybe not. maybe you can trust that during your fantasy draft, the computer won't autodraft a kicker in the 7th round. or... you could just trust duracell.
2:56 pm
♪ >> jesse: all right, greg, it's time for "one more thing." >> greg: let's do this. gregg's guide to making trump happy. we are pretty good at this. if you want to make president trump smile, tell him you will name something after him, like the polish president dead. look at trump's face and the words. >> i said that i would very much like for us to set up a permanent american base in poland, which we would call fort trump, and i firmly believe that this is possible. i'm convinced that such a
2:57 pm
decision, like those in the interest of poland in the united states. [laughter] >> jesse: the eyebrow! >> greg: that was good. >> jesse: all right, happy national cheeseburger day america. i have been right here from bear burger. i think it's got onion rings on it and bacon. people rank their favorite cheeseburgers, and this is surprising to me. 25% choose five guys for their top burger, 21%, wendy's, and only 20%, mcdonalds. that was pretty shocking news to me. and did you know, the first cheeseburger hamburger was made in denver, colorado? >> dana: i had no idea! >> jesse: no one knows. that is why we are here to tell you. >> dana: like the humpty dumpty drive-in. >> jesse: he never enforced his patents. what an idiot. [laughter] all right, juan. this before fall starts
2:58 pm
saturday, and that means hayrides, they means pumpkin picking, and colorful fall leaves. i wanted to show you some pictures. here i am with my grandkids at butler's orchard in maryland. but forget those pictures for a second because we had an experience here at "the five." we want to give it a shadow to two of our beloveds beefed's be 25 and mary mclean from westchester new york. these folks are so kind. melissa francis, our colleague, went out with her daughter, who you will see in a moment in the picture on a bungee jump, and they were asked, you love fox, but what is your favorite show on fox. they said, oh, "the five." then, guess what? they sent us this pumpkin cheesecake! >> dana: that looks good. just before it goes great with burgers. >> jesse: i will eat it after the burger. >> juan: harvest moon, a local favorite. we wish them much success. >> jesse: dana?
2:59 pm
>> dana: we all mess charles krauthammer very much, he passed away in june. but there is some good news for those of you because his legacy continues to live on. when he fell ill, he was in the advanced stages of almost finishing a whole new book, which he entrusted to his son, daniel, that you see pictured there. daniel has completed the book on his behalf. it is going to be called "the point of it all: a lifetime of great love and endeavors." it will soon be released, now available for preorder. if you need a holiday gift, it's for you. if you visit charles krauthammer.com, you can view some of charles' most influential pieces, and you can learn how to preorder the book, and i got a sneak peek. it's fantastic. >> jesse: excellent. nicole? >> nicole: i want to tell you an amazing story about jeffrey, a young boy in a football scrimmage in early august and got a cervical spine fracture, paralyzing him from the neck down. however, he is making amazing recovery and which is transferred to atlanta. he also happens to be one of president trump's biggest fans, working at the rallies, going to
3:00 pm
the inauguration. >> jesse: that is great. >> dana: good luck. >> jesse: set your dvrs, never miss an episode of "the five." "special report" is up next. bret baier, take it away. >> bret: thank you, jessie. this is a fox news alert. i'm bret baier coming to you from the white house. president trump says he hopes the woman accusing his supreme court nominee of sexual assault welcome forward. and state her case. as of right now, college professor dr. chrisitine blasey ford has not accepted an invitation to a public senate hearing next monday. judge brett kavanaugh says he will be there and ready to answer any questions. some democrats say they want an fbi investigation before moving forward. chief white house correspondent john roberts here on the north want to start things off. quite something. >> it always is, bret. it's unclear at this point how all of this is going to go forward. it looks like an investigation, at least for the moment, is not going to happen. whether there is even going to
206 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on