they may let a justice through here and there nominated by a republican. but the fact of the matter is they are going to crush anybody who they believe might change the balance of power. what are we talk about here? >> sean: we are back here monday. have -- ♪ >> laura: i am laura ingraham. this is the "the ingraham angle" on an extraordinary news night this friday night. a shocking report from "the new york times" about deputy attorney general rod rosenstein working to drive the president from office. breaking news at this hour, christine ford, the kavanaugh accuser, has missed yet another deadline set by the judiciary committee. ford's attorneys were to respond tonight by 10:00 p.m. to confirm her appearance before them. instead, she and her attorneys are asking for more time. we are going to get into all the details. and the hollywood crowd steps

into the kavanaugh confirmation. because that's what they're really good at. plus a new halloween costume controversy. identity politics has gone totally crazy. it is all on friday follies with raymond arroyo. first our top story. an absolute jawdropper late this afternoon. a report from "the new york times." it lays out that in the spring of 2017, deputy a.g. rod rosenstein suggested secretly recording president trump and discussed invoking the 25th amendment to throw the president out of office. now, rosenstein, as you would expect, is forcefully denying that this ever happened. separately, a fox news source, said to be in the same room as this conversation, is claiming that rosenstein's comments were just sarcastic. they weren't serious. does anyone believe that tonight? "washington post" is also reporting that. but let's take a trip, shall we,

down rosenstein memory lane. this is the same guy who responded like this to demands from congress to produce documents in that russia probe. >> the department of justice is not going to be extorted. we are going to do what's required by the rule of law. >> laura: so congressional oversight and demands for accountability and transparency are extortion? that somehow runs counter to the rule of law. got it, rod. his apparent contempt for oversight and lawmakers doesn't stop there. here he is in front of the house judiciary committee just a few months ago. >> i am deputy attorney general of the united states, okay. i'm not the person doing the redacting. i'm responsible for responding to your concerns, as i have -- >> did you read the fisa application before you signed it? >> i'm not going to comment about any fisa application. >> you won't say to this committee whether or not you even read the document you signed that authorized spying on people associated with the trump campaign?

>> i -- >> laura: i love the trailing off there, perfect for a friday night. let's not forget that rosenstein even threatened to subpoena e-mails, phone records and other documents from lawmakers and staff on the house intel committee. they did that earlier this year. now, let's be clear, if "the new york times" reporting is accurate, the president tonight should seriously consider whether rod rosenstein should remain on the job. the white house should be devoting every resource it can to determining the veracity of this report. we just cannot have this plotting at the highest levels of the justice department against the chief executive of this executive branch. joining us now, former trump campaign manager, corey lewandowski, lee smith from real clear investigations and former u.s. attorney, kendall coffey. let's go right to you, lee. you have been covering rod rosenstein for a year and a half

now, since he initially got this job as deputy attorney general. tonight, i just want to play for you a short montage of a variety of pundits claiming per "the washington post" that this conversation about wearing a wire and getting other people to wear a wire, this is all just a joke. let's watch. >> if the words were said, it seems more likely they were said in some sort of sarcastic or exasperated way rather than as a serious plan to actually wire up and go into do this. >> this does not give any grounds -- and i really mean this -- any grounds at all in terms of any action of rosenstein's that justifies firing him. >> it makes sense to me that maybe he could have made a crack about it. >> it is important to see this story about rosenstein and the "times" and in the "post" they are all part of the

declassification issue. >> laura: explain that. >> we have seen since monday when the president said he was going to declassify documents. over the last week, "the new york times," abc news, a number of publications have had stories blocking -- trying to block the declassification. they have been sourced to former and current u.s. officials. i see this as part of the same thing. the "times" stories apparently sourced to andy mccabe. >> he said he didn't talk. his people are saying they didn't talk to "the times" on this. >> the lawyers statement looks to me like a non-denial on twitter. i think what it looks like is that mccabe or someone close to mccabe is threatening rosenstein saying i've got a lot of dirty stuff on you as well. if these things aren't declassified, you are going down with me. unbeknownst to andrew mccabe, it appears according to my sources, that some time between last night and this morning, rod rosenstein went in and talked to

president trump and convinced him to hold off on declassifying the documents, kick them, instead, over to the inspector general. >> laura: how does that help the president? >> it does not help the president. the purpose was to delay. it was rosenstein apparently who convinced trump to do it. unbeknownst to mccabe, he had no idea. presumably, the times story was in the works for several days. the story drops a couple of hours after trump tweets that the documents are going to the i.g. you can imagine rosenstein's horror. mccabe has blown this beautiful plan i had to get us both in the clear. i think that's what happened. rosenstein's attempt to cover up the story appears source to him, he is covering up, of course i was telling a joke. >> laura: if it is a joke, and corey, you can chime in here, he must have a really lame sense of humor. a joke isn't, hey, let's wear a wire.

i'll wear a wire or someone else, one of you can, and then we will get someone to invoke the 25th amendment. maybe i can get sessions. how is that funny? there is no giggle in any of that. corey? i think lee is right. this is all about the declassification. trump backtracked for some reason. i think that was a big gift to rosenstein, because he is worried about that fisa application and the fact that exculpatory information was not put in that fisa application to monitor carter page. corey? >> you are exactly right. and everybody has to reremember that that was the third renewal of the application. there were four. the first was denied by the fisa court. rod rosenstein signed it. when the president made the announcement he was going to declassified bruce ohr's 302, it was going to reveal that nelle, ohr, bruce's wife, was talking to christopher steel, and that

the justice department knew about it and that rod rosenstein was aware of what bruce ohr was doing. he was his supervisor. that would have come out very clearly. he was so afraid that declassification was going to expose him for what he is, which is part of the deep state. this collusion never existed. it has been a fake dossier from the beginning. we have done extensive research. we have seen what rod rosenstein is really about. whether it's rod rosenstein. he covered up for peter strzok, lisa page and andrew mccabe. he's also the individual, and you remember this, he recommended that bob mueller become the head of the fbi after comey was fired. and then the next day, he personally appointed robert mueller as the special counsel to investigate this president. >> laura: tonight the president briefly referenced this issue with the secret recording. let's batch. -- watch. >> we have great people in the department of justice. we have great people. they are people, i really believe, you take a poll. i have to be at 95%. you had some real bad ones. you are seeing what has happened

at the fbi. they are all gone but there is a lingering stench. we are going to get rid of that too. >> laura: kendall, a lingering stench. your thoughts there? who is he preferring to pray tell? >> obviously, he is concerned about rod rosenstein. i think he should be. i don't think we can make "the new york times" the judge and jury of rosenstein's fate. but what the challenge is, is to find a very accelerated framework for getting to the bottom of this. i don't think the president needs to, for example, ask the justice department to investigate itself. i think he has the power and perhaps should go ahead and put together an investigative mechanism perhaps relying in part on the white house counsel's office so that they can get access, redacted, blacked out in certain places or not, whatever these mccabe memos are. at some point, to bring rod rosenstein into the office, look him in the eye. this president has famously done with a lot of people hired and

fired people, looked in the eye and see if he can get an adequate explanation for this. but if it's true -- if the way it's presented in "the new york times" is true, it is something very, very troubling that can't be continuing. >> laura: apparently, according to the report, i am going to read some of it. apparently, the gist of it is that rosenstein was really ticked off that even though he wrote that letter or memo justifying the firing of comey, giving a justification for the firing of comey, he was mad that then the president relied on it when he was asked about it. he both wrote it and then he was mad the president relied on it. that just torqued him off. this is a "new york times" reporting. i want all three of you to listen to this. rosenstein raised the idea of wearing a recording device or wire to secretly tape the president when he visited the white house. one participant asked whether

rosenstein was serious. he replied, animatedly that he was. now it goes on to say, it is not clear how determined he was about seeing them through, though he did tell mccabe that he might be able to persuade attorney general jeff sessions and john kelly about the 25th amendment, and then the secretary of home security and the white house chief of staff to mount an effort to invoke the 25th. according to others who described his comment, rosenstein not only confirmed that he was serious about the idea but also followed up by suggesting that other fbi official whose were interviewing to be the bureau's director could also secretly record trump. this was around the time where after he fired comey, he was looking at wray. rosenstein's name had been raised for this and a few others, including a former obama person.

according to this -- he wanted -- there is no humor in this. this is ridiculous. there is no humor in this. lee, i want to play this for you. the democrats tonight are saying this is just pretext trump needs to fire rosenstein. this is what leon panetta said tonight. >> he's got to think very carefully about the implications of taking action here, because if he does this, it raises concerns about the mueller investigation. it raises concerns about the possibility of obstruction. >> laura: why would it be obstruction of justice? the mueller investigation goes on. >> i think the whole thing is exactly the opposite. i think it is rosenstein that appointed him. i think the interesting thing and revelatory thing is that it exposes a lot of people, a lot of wrong doers at the fbi and

doj. they are turning on each other like rats. i hope the president sees that before he makes decisions. i'll say the important, vital thing is declassifying these documents so we can all understand what the bad guys at the doj and the fbi were doing as these two articles give some sort of indication there is more in those documents we can be sure of. we would like to see them. >> laura: corey, it is true, is it not, that the president can reverse his reversal at any moment? for now, kicking it over to the inspector general, which has no subpoena power. horowitz is a good guy but it is not going to get us anywhere e -- he can reverse his decision at any moment. right now, it seems to me the bruce ohr 302, the interview memos that he wrote, the fisa applications and other text messages are critical to be released unredacted, except for any sources and methods which apparently there aren't any. the president has that ability to do it. he has to override rosenstein to do it.

>> well, that's right. but you have to remember, when he said he was going to redact, there were only certain pages from the fisa application. i think it was pages 10-12 and 14 others pages. it wasn't the entire application. that's perfectly fine. you also have to remember andrew mccabe has been referred by the i.g. for criminal referral. rod rosenstein is the one who is deciding whether or not andrew mccabe is going to be prosecuted for lying under oath to the fbi on three separate occasions, particularly when he was the acting director of the fbi after jim comey was fire. so, look, these guys ran this tight little ka ball that they never thought anybody was going to get caught between jim mccabe, bruce ohr, rod rosenstein and you throw in clapper and brennan, and you have a story that nobody can believe, that these nine or ten individuals have tried from day one to take down a duly-elected president.

not only are they a deep state. they are an enemy of the people. >> laura: kendall, this has been such a wild day of news. both on kavanaugh, which we'll get to in a moment, and on this story. i don't see how this continues with this red hot tension between the president and the justice department. not about even mueller at this point. this is about the running of the department and basic decisions about redacting documents or not redacting or classifying or declassifying. i know it's related to mueller. but i don't see how it's a sustainable situation with rosenstein and i know other people would say with sessions. but with rosenstein i think it's a bad, bad relationship. >> it has to be incredibly uncomfortable and increasingly less productive for the department of justice. i still think there needs to be a thoughtful, very, very fast inquiry. it doesn't have to be formally structured. the president needs to get to the bottom of this. we can't rely on newspaper

stories in terms of making judgments about one of the most powerful positions in the united states government. on the other hand, precisely because the deputy attorney general's position is so powerful, this needs to be resolved as you say and resolved quickly. >> laura: gentlemen, thank you so much. terrific segment. christine blasey ford's lawyer is out with a new response over a hearing with the senate judiciary committee. the details broke late tonight. we will bring them to you after this. this isn't just any moving day.

this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome.

stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today. breaking news in the last hour, christine blasey ford's attorney making an 11th hour desperation play with the senate judiciary committee. just moments ago she asked for another day for dr. ford to consider the offer for her to testify this coming wednesday. the response coming in just before 10:00 p.m. eastern, a deadline tonight. joining us now with reaction is john yu, former general counsel to the senate judiciary committee, former u.s. attorney david katz is with us, and former federal prosecutor john lauro. john, for a lot of us who have been watching this over the last few days, we have been concerned about moving the goalpost. >> yes.

>> laura: i believe the testimony was supposed to be on monday, not wednesday. >> right. >> laura: so it's -- she was supposed to respond about appearing on monday. i think they're negotiating about wednesday. nevertheless, the goalpost keeps moving. it is a smart lawyer i think representing this accuser because she's pushing it to the last minute to get her client as much time, leeway, as she can. at what point does the committee's patience run thin here. >> i think they are just about there. she has to either put up or shut up. how much preparation time does she need to tell the truth? that's the question. i mean, she's been dealing with lawyers for weeks, if not months now. it's time for her to face the music. she's made a very serious accusation and it's now -- now the moment of truth comes. she has to face questioning and be asked the tough questions and she can't escape it. if she refuses to testify, then the bottom line is that he is going to be confirmed and this thing is over.

but there's a legal expression for what her lawyer is doing and that's jerking around. every time they reach a point where there is an agreement, all of the sudden, as you say, the goalpost moves. that's just inappropriate. >> laura: david, i know there are very strong feelings about this case on both sides. there are a lot of democrats that think that she wouldn't come forward unless this happened. although she doesn't remember key details, that's okay. if this has to go on another two or three weeks, so be it. it is interesting to note how this is proceeding as a legal matter at the same time. it is not a legal setting in a courtroom, one would think that making a demand that you have to speak after brett kavanaugh is a little rich, don't you think, at this point, since she is the one making the accusation? >> well, it is not a court of law but it certainly makes sense that the accusation has to come first and that the person being accused gets to hear what the

accusation is and respond to it. some of her other demands, i do think make some expense, you know, not having all these cameras, not having all these things that high officials are used to. she is not used to that. she is going to tell her side of the story. i kind of agree with kellyanne conway who said she should be accommodated and giving her one more day is accommodating her. she shouldn't be attacked. and i think republicans would have apparent victory, wouldn't they, if they ended up losing the house and senate instead of giving her one more day and hearing everyone's side of the story. i think she should also hear mark judge's side of the story. when you are a prosecutor, as i was, you always say, there is one more witness they could have called. why didn't they call him? let the defense call mark judge, if mark judge is so important. here, the democrats don't have the power to call mark judge.

democrats don't have the power to call him. >> laura: actually, david, necessary not true. what the democrats could have done, they could have gone out and done their own investigation, interviewed mark judge, interviewed patrick smyth. they could have gotten quite a bit done in the last 72, 96 hours or so. but instead, what the democrats are doing is they're going on tv talking about how kavanaugh is a sexual predator. someone that i have known for 28 years. john, i know you have known him for a long time. your reaction to this latest demand by the accuser's legal team? >> laura, you actually put your finger on it when you said this isn't actually a courtroom. this is not a criminal trial. this is the senate performing its constitutional job to give advice and consent. is it a political process and a legal process. it is not a criminal trial. the senate doesn't need the fbi to conduct a criminal investigation. as you say, laura, each side has committee staff. they can go out and interview

people and they can interview them under oath. i think that's the most important thing that needs to happen. the stories have to be gotten under oath, under pain of perjury from both judge kavanaugh and from dr. ford. the timing is important. the sooner, the better. as time goes on, people could adjust their stories and change them in response to what they are hearing in the public. i'm worried about that. i think the committee is right to try to freeze the stories in place as soon as possible so that people can't start changing their stories. that would be worse than moving the goalpost. already, we have lost that. >> laura: the republicans did get both judge and patrick smythe, they did interview them and they did sign declarations which were signed under penalty of felony, correct? that was done. democrats could have taken part in the questioning. they decided not to. going back to what david katz said, you have to be more accommodating to the accuser. i think the president was right. let her speak.

but to say that the senate wasn't accommodating, they could have interviewed her at home in california. they said they would. grassley said he would do it behind closed doors, in public, could be questioned by an outside counsel, which i thought, because it is all these white men up there. it would have been better to have an outside counsel, especially a woman, ask the questions, now they don't want that. it seems like they have been quite accommodating, except, we are not going to do it whenever you want to do it, because you don't get to dictate the terms. i want to you listen to part of the letter that was released an hour ago. the imposition of aggressive and artificial deadlines regarding the date and conditions of any hearings has created tremendous and unwarranted anxiety and stress on dr. ford. your cavalier treatment of a sexual assault survivor who has been doing her best to cooperate with the committee is completely

inappropriate. john lauro, cavalier treatment of a sexual assault survivor seems more to me like a political statement than it does to be from a lawyer who wants to actually make some headway in these negotiations. >> it is all about politics. if she was serious about having her client testify, she would have made that decision to put her before the public. let me just say one thing. she is going to be treated with kid gloves. under no circumstances, is she going to be abused or treated disrespectfully. that would be counterintuitive to what the republican majority wants to do. so the reality is, they bent over backwards to have her come in under appropriate circumstances. let's remember one thing. an accuser does not get to call the shots. this is a process with deadlines. she has decided to come forward and now she has to testify truthfully and honestly and face the music.

>> laura: david? >> i was a prosecutor. i have also defended people in the same situation as judge kavanaugh who are faced with charges that seem absolutely unbelievable. they are totally denied by my clients and i have gotten not guilties. and there are rules of procedure in court. the rules are less clear in the senate. my point is that the republicans and the committee should not be seen as not giving her a fair shot, as not hearing her story, as not understanding this is a very unreported crime. as senator collins has pointed out. president trump should treat her with respect at all times, including his tweets. and the republicans for their own sake should tweet her with respect. and all the women in this situation, a man in this situation, they don't come forward all the time. sometimes it is a long time before they make these allegations. everybody can understand that.

it's a pyrrhic victory if they lose the house or senate -- >> laura: no one is being cavalier. >> she has asked for one more day. >> laura: the vote was supposed to be yesterday. the vote was supposed to be yesterday. feinstein, john yu, had the letter in july. the democrat, randy sideman, who was already plotting about how to derail kavanaugh. the same person who is advising the legal team. on overall process and pr. this has turned into a political cudgel to be used again donald trump, kavanaugh, the republicans, all the way to the mid-term elections. that might sound cynical but i've been in washington for 30 years. and brett kavanaugh is not getting any respect in this process. he is not being respected too well himself. >> i agree with you. not only do we show respect for dr. ford, we also have show

respect to not just judge kavanaugh but to the senate. i think the senate has been manipulated. these charges were held back until the very last minute, even after the hearings were over. what the senate has to do is to make sure it does its constitutional job. this is not about a forum for airing grievances much the senate has to find out the truth. there is no forensic evidence anymore. the only thing that is left is the witness's testimony. the senators have to put them under oath and being respectful. we have found in our legal system, the best way to get the truth is to subject both witnesses to questioning and cross-examinations. i don't think anyone should be treated with kid gloves or differently. we ask this of people in cases every day in courtrooms around the country in these kind of cases. i don't think we should expect any less and give respect to kavanaugh and dr. ford but show them respect by expecting them to tell the truth under oath and be willing to answer questions

under questioning and cross-examination. >> laura: we don't change the cameras or the lighting. there is only one camera angle. what is that? if you are going to launch that kind of allegation against someone, this late in the game, 36 years later, then come along and say, i don't want a camera and a woman can't ask the questions. to me this is -- i don't know -- i don't like the feel of any of that. >> laura, we have to respect the victims too. we have to respect alleged victims. >> laura: i'm sorry. i'm going -- but when i heard the camera thing, i thought -- everybody goes up before that committee has to be up before the cameras. >> the senate agreed to that. >> laura: did i say they didn't? i thought it was really, really goofy. okay? you look silly and goofy, it sets a terrible precedent. i don't like that precedent of having to change the process so late in the game. >> she is a victim. >> laura: there are a lot of victims. >> she's not used to that.

>> we don't know that. >> laura: a lot of us aren't used to this because it's so late in the game. guys, when we return, which halloween costume is already offending the p.c. crowd? hollywood steps in to attack brett kavanaugh and a lot more. raymond arroyo next. attack attack i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. we are the tv doctors of america, and we may not know much about medicine, but we know a lot about drama. from scandalous romance, to ridiculous plot twists. (gasping) son? dad! we also know you can avoid drama by getting an annual check-up. so we're partnering with cigna to remind you to go see a real doctor. go, know, and take control of your health.

it could save your life. doctor poses! dad! cigna. together, all the way.

>> laura: it's friday. it means it is time for tonight's edition of a halloween costume is causing outrage. yes, indeed. to tell us about it, we are joined by "new york times" best selling author of the forthcoming will wilder, fox news contributor, raymond arroyo. what costume is driving the p.c. crowd crazy? >> you and everyone will remember at the kavanaugh hearing, there were women that dressed up in the costumes from "handmaid's tale" the hulu series. they were forced into surrogacy in the process of this miniseries. well, a website called yandy, which specializes in lingerie,

launched a brand new string of halloween costumes, including this one, which depicted the costumes of the handmaid's tale. well, women took to twitter and said, wait a minute, rape is not funny, rape victims are not funny. this must be taken down. the fictional charactering being lampooned and sexualized is outrageous. in a statement, any said, it has become obvious that the yandy brave red maiden costume is being seen as a symbol of women's suppression rather than a symbol of empowerment. i went to some of their other offerings to see what was there. >> laura: you want to buy something for rebecca. >> i don't. i found the bad habit nun costume, and the religious sister costume and the sexy schoolgirl uniform and the study date schoolgirl.

>> laura: who is studying that. >> here's the problem. it's okay sexualize young girls, nuns, but fictional characters are off limit. we have to respect women, not objectify them the culture says and on the other hand gives them only costumes during this season that sexualizes and objectifies them including being religiously offensive. >> laura: i can't believe you can't wear indian and pilgrim costumes. >> the sexy native americans. naughty native americans. hollywood is all in on the mid-term fight and the kavanaugh battle. earlier hollywood a-listers like julianne moore and america ferrera, created a homemade video backing the accuser. and thanked her for coming forward. and now, jesus christ superstar

star, john legend, has emerged with his own home video, a constitutional scholar now. >> who becomes the next supreme court justice is a decision of a lifetime, your lifetime. brett kavanaugh's troubling views and his rushed confirmation process make him unfit for a lifetime appointment to the supreme court. this fall, your senators will vote on kavanaugh. how they vote will impact you for a lifetime. tell them to vote no on kavanaugh. >> laura: his wife is a beautiful model. she has tweeted the nastiest stuff about the president, nasty, nasty. that's fine. >> people are entitled to their opinion. >> laura: fine, be talented. >> they are entitled to their opinion. here is my problem, their opinion is only as valid as anybody else's. they are very talented but we don't need their constitutional views. just sing nice songs, be happy. >> you're going to say shut up and sing. >> i'm not going to say shut up and anything.

where is the hollywood activism on behalf of people like keith ellison's accuser, the clinton accusers. we need those voices too. it is all one-sided. use your celebrity across the board. ben & jerry's is now involved in this mid-term. they have appointed seven new candidates they picked out at random, left-leaning candidates and they want people to pick a flavor that most captures the essence of those candidates. i looked at them and their opinions. we are dealing with rocky road, cotton candy and cuckoos and cream and chubby hubby. i think would -- >> laura: just a few. >> now the #metoo movement has spurred and created so many things, it's birthed a phenomenon called modern masculinity. it's being marketed to millennials. >> it takes one man's courage to start a chain reaction. if somebody is really feeling

something and he has the balls to stand up and say, i'm really sad right now and then you check and you watch the rest of the group as that man says that and they just -- >> what do you think? these are retreats. these guys stand around -- >> laura: hold me back. that is hot. sexy. >> you know what the problem with this is? unlike religious retreats, where it is about your relationship with god and others, this is all about my feelings. they gaze into each other's eyes, these men, while they talk about body image and sexuality. you know what they need -- >> laura: brokeback retreat. >> they need lessons in how to be dads and fulfill the duties of manhood.

that will teach you masculinity rather than gazing at your bro and wondering how he thinks about your pecs. this is what happening when you have silicon valley come up with retreats for men? >> you have many more segments. thank you. >> laura: the battle over brett kavanaugh is turning the midterms on his head. what does it mean for the president's agenda? up next. head. what does once-daily toujeo® helps you control your blood sugar. toujeo not only provides stable blood sugar control around the clock, the max solostar holds 900 units of insulin in one pen. this could mean fewer refills of toujeo. all that and a $0 copay! that's something to groove about. ♪ let's groove tonight. ♪ share the spice of life from the makers of lantus®, toujeo® provides blood sugar-lowering activity ♪ baby slice it right. all day, all night, and beyond, proven blood sugar control all day and all night, and significantly lower your a1c. toujeo® is used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin.

don't use toujeo® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. get medical help right away if you have a serious allergic reaction such as body rash, or trouble breathing. don't reuse needles, or share insulin pens. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be life-threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose of insulin without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor about all your medicines and medical conditions. check insulin label each time you inject. taking tzds with insulins like toujeo® may cause heart failure that can lead to death. find your rhythm and keep on grooving. ♪ let's groove tonight. ♪ to experience toujeo, ask your doctor.

>> laura: the kavanaugh

confirmation brawl could have an impact on the upcoming mid-term. president trump is putting aside talk of a red wave replacing it with a new passionate call to rally his supporters. here he is in missouri tonight. >> president trump: you have to get out and vote. if you lose the mid-term, we are going to go through nothing but fights. we're going to be fighting to keep what you have. they're going to want to take it away. you've got to get out. you can't be complacent. it is fragile. you got to get out. >> laura: joinings now is will jawando, a democratic strategist, who is the party's nominee for the county counsel in montgomery county, maryland. it's great to see you, will. >> good to be here. >> laura: the president was before a little confident because the economy was so great, this prediction of the big blue wave was probably overstated. but clearly, he's playing the investigations. they're just going to be dropping down investigation after investigation, all this

progress we made will be turned back. how do you see things. >> i think someone got in his ear. you often hear with trump, whoever is the last person to leave he listens to. you need to make sure our base turns out. the democrats are obviously motivated. you have 153 women running for congress, nominated. it's going to be another year of the woman. turnout is up in every state in maryland. we were up 25%. someone realized you have to get your base fired up. >> laura: what are the democrats running for? >> we are running to make sure that there is equality and everyone has a seat at the table, that women are there, that we get health care back and we make education equal. betsy devos has been a disaster at the department of education. >> laura: how so? >> she has rolled back so many things. i worked at the department of education. >> laura: i did too. a little before you. under reagan. >> a couple years. rolling back protections for lgbt communities, giving private

colleges, letting them run ramshod. there are a lot of things. >> laura: the thing i think that is tough for democrats, i think a lot of it is they don't like trump's personality. i think that's a lot of it for the democrats. because he's really doing a great job on the economy. african-american, hispanic unemployment, women-owned businesses, confident in the future of this country. right truck, wrong track. there is a 12-year turn-around. i believe that's right. i think that's right. right track, wrong track is much better than a few years back. all of that is really positive for the country. now i get democrats want more equality. but isn't the way to get more equality to have more economic opportunity? that's a big part of it, is it not? >> said those manufacturing jobs aren't coming back. they are coming back under trump.

>> it's a new economy. you've seen a spike because of the tax cuts. but any objective analysis has shown that the job growth through the recession had ended well under obama and it's continued. this trade war that trump is creating has a big-time effect on hurting us in the long-term. these unpaid for tax cuts are going to hurt us in the long term. >> laura: how is it hurting you in the long-term? do you think it is sustainable to have a $380 billion trade deficit with china, that's sustainable? >> no, it's not -- >> laura: what did obama do to turn it around? i think it is cliche. politics is cliche. so is sports. it is just a change. that can't continue for the country. at some point, you have to pay the piper. >> trillion dollars deficits in unpaid for tax cuts. >> laura: the problem is, we had the debt double under obama.

the people are going to have to decide whether they want to go forward with economic advancement or they want to go backwards. i think it's going to be tough -- democrats are going to have the historic edge. great to have you on. >> good to be back. >> laura: dramatic new evidence in the accusations of domestic abuse by dnc co-chair, keith ellison. will democrats finally speak out? we have new details next. ellison.

this isn't just any moving day. this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience

and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome. stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today.

>> laura: charges of domestic abuse against dnc co-chair keith ellison. joining us now is kristin fisher. >> the details have been dripping out for over a month now. the latest bit to drop is the woman accusing congressman keith ellison of domestic abuse has released what appears to be a medical document from 2017 detailing the alleged abuse caused allegedly by the congressman. karen monahan is his ex-girlfriend and she published the document on social media it appears to be a minnesota clinic back in november of 2017. she wrote that a doctor wrote

she was in a very stressful environment for years, emotional and physical abuse by a partner with whom she is now separated. she identifies the individual she was involved with as congressman ellison. she is worried about retribution if she identifies him publicly. now she published the document days after claiming that the democratic party, quote, smeared, threatened, and isolated her over these allegations against the congressment. they are reviewing the allegations. ellison has categorically denied all of it. after the allegations came out, he still went on to win the democratic primary for minnesota attorney general. >> laura: unbelievable.

..

>> it takes a lot to put this show on every night. certainly not just yours truly, a big team. one of our >> takes a lot to put this show on every night, not just yours truly, a big team. one of our favorite senior producers, neck robertson is saying goodbye to the network

after ten years. i can't believe it and he eped the show tonight. we are going to miss you. thanks for everything you have done for the show. making manual filling in. mike: welcome to fox news at night, this is a fox news alert. the lawyer for the woman accusing brett kavanaugh of sexual assault 36 years ago in high school is asking for an extra day to consider terms for testifying, she was facing a 10:00 pm deadline set by the republican judiciary committee. new reaction from rod rosenstein out a short while ago to a new