pomposity, smugness and groupthink. good night from washington. sean hannity somehow showed up on our set here in washington. >> sean: i know, welcome aboard. you gave me five seconds at extra, added to the clock. >> tucker: i'm a generous man. >> sean: we have huge massive breaking news from the political "wall street journal" just literally seconds ago. we will break it down. this stench by the way has never been worse. tonight, there is no line that democrats in this country, the left in this country, it will not cross when it comes to stopping the nomination of judge brett kavanaugh. all civility, all morality, all decency, all fairness, it it has all been thrown right out the window and right now tonight we are in a trench fight for what are the fundamental rights of all americans. democrats clearly now on a witch hunt, clearly hell-bent on destroying the name, the

character, the career and even the family of judge kavanaugh without any due process. zero presumption of innocence or even an added dose of common sense. you have a sleazy attention seeking lawyer by the name of michael avenatti, all leading the way. the number one guest on fake news cnn and msnbc and he along with nancy pelosi and maxine waters are the new leaders of the democratic party, which is now becoming a party of mob rule. no due process, no presumption of innocence. we will preview and review all of today's breaking news and we will go through it slowly and set the stage for what is tomorrow's extremely important hearing. judge kavanaugh and his accuser and professor christine ford will rightfully have a chance to speak. we will now in the next hour separate fact from fiction, and talk about constitution and due process and brings sanity to one of the single most important

processes in our federal government. and we will do that in tonight's d.c. sewer swamp opening monologue. the one we will go through all of this very, very slowly and precisely, lots of ground to cover, with even breaking news on the last 2 minutes. tomorrow morning we will finally get a chance to witness one of the most important hearings in history of supreme court nominations. as i've said many times, the 36-year-old allegation should be taken seriously. and it has been by republicans and the president. at 10:00 a.m. and open hearings they will lay it all on the table and in the u.s. senate they will make an informed decision about judge kavanaugh. remember, their constitutional role is advice and consent. of course, that's very important. 40 years of one's life is very important. judge kavanaugh has been in the public spotlight for all these

decades and because of his work he is literally faced and passed six deep background fbi checks. those that know kavanaugh the best, i school friends in college friends, those that went to law school, girlfriends, colleagues, fellow judges and clerks, those people that have all worked with him, was the coach with basketball in other sports, democrats and republicans, i have praised kavanaugh for his character, judgment and friendship and who he is. throughout until 12 days ago, any allegation of any sexual misconduct ever. judge kavanaugh has had one of the most extensive track records of any federal judge and he worked one of the most highest profile federal courts. he's been there for years and we also know that professor ford and her groping allegations against him have a lot of issues. we will go step-by-step through every allegation tonight.

these charges were made to congressional democrats, and while just a few weeks ago, not an independent law enforcement agency. by the way, the claim dates back to when ford and kavanaugh were in high school 36 years ago and ford cannot remember a date or location of the alleged incident. and the four witnesses that ford listed to corroborate her claims, all of them deny what she is alleging and professor ford has represented by an attorney who pointed out on this show is a left-wing activist who once vowed to resist donald trump at every level and his inconsistent on important issues involving sexual harassment in the workplace. she didn't believe paula jones obviously, she defended al franken. despite all of these warning signs, it is so important that professor ford and judge kavanaugh speak under oath.

the president would make every accommodation possible and tonight democrats are doing the exact opposite. they have already convicted judge kavanaugh before even hearing from him. or professor ford. and rushing to judgment against two uncorroborated claims against kavanaugh, allegations that are so salacious will literally tonight make your head spin. the second plane that came out in the new yorker magazine was so outrageous and so unsubstantiated that even the child hating "new york times" refused to officially report on it. in this case, a woman named deborah ramirez. she alleges that in the 1980s, kavanaugh might have exposed himself to her at a drunken college party. ramirez herself wasn't totally sure if it was kavanaugh, if he was the perpetrator. according to her own words in her own account she became" quickly inebriated" at the

party. she was "foggy and slurring her words" and ramirez even acknowledged that she had significant memory gaps from that evening. those ramirez listed in her case to the incident have all flat flatly denied her charge including her own best friends. not a single person corroborate her story, not one. moments ago we learned there is another accuser making an anonymous hearsay claim about an incident that took place between kavanaugh and a woman in 1998 and this anonymous nbc news report is obviously a report that i doubt nbc news would ever make about tom brokaw or matt lauer or and he lacked. they wouldn't do it about people that they've worked with or have worked with over the years. so the question is, i was judge kavanaugh supposed to defend himself now from an anonymous accuser at the 11th hour? which now brings us to the single most sickening allegation

that the left wants you to believe as absolute fact. it was brought into the public domain by -- you know him, he's on fake news cnn every hour on the hour and if he is not there he's over on conspiracy tv and nbc. michael avenatti, the bombastic, untrustworthy and fame seeking attorney who made it his life's mission to resist and hate donald trump, which is fine. his client in this case is a woman named julie swetnick. at this late hour she is alleging that between 1981 and 1983, she attended at least ten parties, where she claims that judge kavanaugh and his friend mark judge routinely drug to female partygoers. this happened regularly, almost on a weekend basis. and even in the summer. and it was an organized scheme to either give them grain alcohol or drugs, to gang or

train raped these victims. she also claims to have been part of one of those gang rapes. she's saying that they would attend parties and young girls were drugged and. nor did anyone else that ever went to any of these parties, not a single party. no specific dates were given and no names were given other than mark judge and judge kavanaugh. no other witnesses listed, no one has corroborated these claims. during the alleged time period, she would have been enrolled in college while kavanaugh would have been a 15 or 16-year-old high school student. she described boys waiting in line to rape drugged women.

she said she went to at least ten of these parties and many more happened and nobody ever told the teacher. a law enforcement representative, appearance, anybody, everyone that was a part of this all kept it secret. in a statement, kavanaugh reacted to this and this is what he said. this is ridiculous and from the twilight zone. i don't know who this is in this never happened. today, just hours after these allegations became public, 64 high school acquaintances and friends of judge kavanaugh rushed to his defense in a statement, calling these claims "nonsense. we never witnessed any behavior that even approach is what is described in this allegation. it is reprehensible and the extensive amount of time we have collectively spent with brett kavanaugh, we do not recall having ever met someone named julie swetnick, nor did we ever observe him engaging in any conduct resembling that

described in her so-called declaration. remember, judge kavanaugh told our own martha maccallum that he was a throughout all of high school and most of college. can't believe we are discussing this, but we are, is what he said. >> people generally in high school, i think all of us have done things in high school that we look back on and regret or cringe a bit. that's not what we are talking about, we are talking about an allegation of sexual assault. i never sexually assaulted anyone, i never had any intercourse or anything close to intercourse in high school and many years thereafter. the girls from the schools i went to and i were fine. >> so you are saying that they're all these years in question you are a? >> that's correct. >> if you never had intercourse with anyone high school and through college since we are probing into your personal life here? >> many years after, i will leave it at that.

>> sean: now today senator lindsey graham tweeted out "i have a difficult time believing that any person could continue going to ten parties over a two-year period where women were routinely gang rape ed and not reported. why would any person can need to put themselves and their friends in danger? isn't there some duty to warn others? and also breaking moments before we came on air, new reports that a restraining order was filed against julie swetnick by her ex-boyfriend in 2001. her boyfriend tonight telling the politico "right after i broke up with her she was threatening my family, my wife, threatening to do harm to my baby at that time. and then she said in a telephone conversation with politico, i know a lot about her, she's not credible at all, he said it, not

at all. look with "the wall street journal" is reporting just minutes ago. roughly a decade ago, julie swetnick was involved in a dispute with a former employer, employer, new york life insurance company, over a sexual harassment complaint that she filed. according to people familiar with her, the firm was run by deborah katz, the lawyer currently representing dr. ford and the company finally reached a settlement with julie swetnick according to people in "the wall street journal" ." despite everything we have now show deal, you have, and this is why we are in a crisis in this country. many in the left, many in the media, the democratic party, they have already convicted judge kavanaugh of what a horrific, life shattering claim and we have the evidence, take a look. >> this is a monumental, defining moment this week. when you have someone like

coffee going to prison and then kavanaugh going to the highest court in the land. >> to be honest that's a very white male defense. >> part of this backlash that we are seeing right now comes from a culture of sexism and paternalism in this country, and that silence generation after generation. >> this is a patriarchal on for my full display. >> that to me -- it just was not believable. >> we allow the predator in chief, the admitted predator in chief to place people on the supreme court. he is picking the type of people that are essentially like him. and this thing as a whole investigation now, it should not

go forward. >> sean: while the left, the media and the democrats all rush to judgment, many others with serious criminal claims will utilize the services of the political, very anti-trumpet, and it's a sleazy lawyer named michael avenatti. earlier today the president had this to say about him, take a look. >> president trump: if you take a look at this lawyer that just came out, he's a lowlife. he represented democrats and nobody ever talks about that. it's not a very good one but he is a democratic lawyer so it's a horrible con game and i think the people are finding it out. >> sean: i want everyone to think about this because i believe americans are fair-minded. this isn't about republicans or democrats denied all or conservative or liberal. michael avenatti, nancy pelosi, maxine waters, now the new faces of the democratic party. we have an election in 41 days. i call menotti gearing up for a

presidential run. this is now, and this is what we got to think about. this is now a party of no due process, no rule of law, no constitution, a zero presumption of innocence. do you know, it's in the last 12 days i can't find a single democrat that is willing to defend the principal of presumption of innocence and due process? by the way, the party of bill clinton and keith ellison. so tonight what we are seeing from michael avenatti on the people on the left in this country, sadly, i tell you this all the time. they use this tactic every two and four years, character assassination. it's the number one tool in the democratic playbook and something the president called out early today and a powerful press conference. how often do i say every two or four years, they will call republicans racist? how horrible is that, sexist and misogynist, xena phobic and

homophobic, islamophobic? republicans want dirty air and water and they want children to die and they want to throw granny over the cliff. we've now gotten used to it. but to say that about people, every election season, to do this with every supreme court nominee, here's what the president said. >> president trump: they are actually con artists because they know what quality this man is and they've destroyed a man's reputation and they want to destroy it even more. i think people will see that in the midterms, but they have done to this family and what they have done to these children, these beautiful children of his and what they have done to his wife. and they know it is a big fat con job. they go into a room and i guarantee you, they laugh like hell at what they have pulled off on you and on the public. they laugh like hell. >> sean: the president knows the shameful tactics of the left firsthand. remember during the presidential election, remember when "the new york times," i think it was top fold, they falsely

accuse president trump sexual misconduct, the so-called bombshell story. the only problem is the source of the time used denied trump ever acted inappropriately. we know because we interviewed some of them, a number of them. here's what the president said about that earlier today. >> president trump: i was accused by, i believe it was for women. you can check with sean hannity or fox because they covered it very strongly. i was accused by four or five women who got paid a lot of money to make up stories about me. we caught them in the mainstream media refused to put that on television. they refuse to even write about it. >> sean: we actually followed up on that program. everyone else in the media ignoring and going along with "the new york times" and what they put out. i actually did some reporting and had the opportunity to interview the women from the at times fake news story. here's what they said after the times make the accusation.

take a look. >> i've never seen him be anything but a gentleman, a very gracious to women and respectful of women. anybody that tells me that i saw that it is. he wasn't that way to me or anybody. i met a lot of women when he was around. he employs a lot of women at deals with a lot of women and he respects them and they respect him. >> i basically wouldn't give them a story and then they came out with their own version of it and took something out of my book and totally twisted it and made it so negative. i have nothing but positive things to say about donald trum donald trump. >> sean: i don't remember the retraction in "the new york times" either. the left's character assassination strategy didn't start with president trump, it's a time-tested practice from the democratic party. remember what they did to reagan's nominee for the u.s. supreme court, robert robert b? he was never nominated because of all the slander.

the guy that told nobody after he left a woman to die after a car accident and went home and went to bed? robert chappaquiddick kennedy. >> this is a land where women will be forced into back alley abortions, black would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizen stores in midnight raids and writers and artists would be censured at the whim of government. >> sean: then a few years later, of course democrats tried to bring the prime court justice who became one of the finest justices in our generation, clarence thomas, through the mud. 1991, senate democrats pulled out his former colleague anita hill making sexual harassment allegations against him. sound familiar? this character assassination was so vicious and so horrible, so nasty, justice thomas called it a high-tech lynching. take a look. >> this is a circus, it's a

national disgrace. and from my standpoint as a black american, as far as i'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deigned to think for themselves. to do for themselves. to have different ideas. and it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. you will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the u.s. senate, rather than hung from a tree. >> sean: the circus of disgrace is back in washington and these tactics don't stop at the supreme court nominees, many also try to destroy the character. i know, i was in atlanta at the time of the olympic bombing. richard jewell falsely accused as being the lone bomber.

he fit the profile because he lived with his mother. he was listening to my radio show at the time and said i was the only one that stood up for him at least gave him the presumption of innocence. he changed my life. they also smeared falsely accused -- remember the duke lacrosse team? we didn't rush to judgment on the show. and let's not forget with the left dated in ferguson. darren wilson was found innocent in that case. remember baltimore, freddie gray? trave on martin, george zimmerman. how many times did president obama rush to judgment? the cambridge police acted stupidly. during every big moment, so many in the left and so many in the press rushed to judgment for pure political gain. there is no presumption of innocence ever with these people when it comes to politics. harry reid lies about mitt romney and said he hasn't paid taxes in ten years. when asked about it later after the election and romney lost, he boasts about eight. he's proud of his life. this happens every election

season, one of the biggest smeared jobs of all comes from christopher steele's dirty dossier. a document bought and paid for by hillary clinton and the dnc to lie to you, the american people, to reagan election in this country and then to destroy a president after with absurd untrue salacious claims like this. trumps a "perverted conduct in moscow included pairing the presidential suite at the hotel where he knew president obama had stayed on one of the trips to russia and defiling the bed where they had slept by hiring a number of to perform golden showers, in other words, in front of him. he said that dossier, there is only a 50/50 chance. those lies were spread to you of the american people. hillary paid for it, russian

allies of all things. yet the left push these unverified and uncorroborated claims throughout the highest levels of our government right into the gullible media, their arm that pushes their propaganda. as you can see, the left's attempt to destroy the lives of people with baseless claims, it is a clear, obvious and now predictable pattern. these are real people unfortunately, these are real lives when you say that someone is a racist or sexist or homophobe, a gang, real families. democrats, using all of them. pawns in a political gain, no due process and no perception of innocence. how would you feel if it was you, america comes tonight? because this is the modern democratic party. they have now defined of themselves as a party of slanderers, smear, character assassination and a party of this parchment. this is clearly who they are because i can't find a democrat now saying they believe in the

presumption of innocence. this now defines them. the only one power for themselves. are they talking about the economy, about security for the american people? this is why every fair-minded american has a right to be skeptical tonight. what you are witnessing is one of the ugliest smear campaigns in history. if america doesn't get this right, there will be no good people in this country that ever want to serve their country for decades to come. why would they? they are not doing it for the money. democrats are now the party of no due process. they are the party of no presumption of innocence. they are not the party that believes in the constitution. as one democrat said, presumption of innocence? i haven't heard them. and you want to know why? because they all seem to believe when politics are in play, when power is in play, that's what matters. all of this, i hope you remember in 41 days.

here with reaction, fox news contributor tammy bruce, former u.s. attorney for the district of columbia. don't judge on them i could dig and carter and mara kane is with us. we will start with you tammy bruce, in new york. >> it's an astounding monologue you gave but it's a reminder to everyone how -- what the horrible situation we are in. as you know for a couple of weeks now i have been concerned about the attitude about sexual assault victims. i claimed that we should watch out for women not being believed because of the attitude of what's happening here and how this claims are not being used as a political football or political bomb if you will. it's a new claim, and it's literally unbelievable. we are now in a position where everyone is looking at this and questioning the nature of accusations because now they are

simply being used for political reasons. and the other argument is, the presumption of innocence for a court room, is not a courtroom and obviously that's not true. the law and judicial framework must be a reflection of how we treat each other in civil life and business legally and socially. and they move into businesses and accusations that it's enough. she moves into our social sphere in general, this is supposed to be the modeling of how we treat other americans and our neighbors. the left wants division, and so much on hatred that they wanted to flow over onto the rest of u us.

and, right now kavanaugh is just a symbol in my opinion now, a symbol of what the left wants to destroy. >> sean: joe >> sean: joe digenova, event in this town with the stanza long time. ever see anything this bad? >> no i haven't and i think senator feinstein has set in motion one of the great tragedies in american history. she has seduced and besmirched the united states senate and purposely tried to ruin a good man but more than that she has tried to ruin his wife and his two daughters. this is a disgraceful performance by the democratic party. and let me say this to mazie hirono, the hawaiian senator, democrat, who told all the men of america to shut up. tonight i say to her, shut up senator, shot up. i'm sick of you, i'm sick of dianne feinstein, i'm sick of

senator blumenthal and all the democrats who have one thing in mind. they want power. they thirst for power and they don't care who they ruin in the process. this is a moment of disgrace. for the united states senate and if they don't confirm him to the united states senate, the republicans will lose the senate. this is a national disgrace. >> sean: i have known you for many, many years and you've never told anybody to shut up in your life. could you imagine anybody saying to any woman ever, shut up, and what the reaction would have been? >> yes. it's amazing and i'm so sick of the democrats on this committee, what they are doing. it's not just to judge kavanaugh but the country. >> you are absolutely right and it's also about women. tammy bruce brought up a good point. these assassination attempts on kavanaugh and his family, and

that leaves the rest of the women that actually have a reason to complain, a reason to go to the law, now how will we be treated as women? now we have a man whose family has been besmirched as you said. just ripped apart. the only thing for us to do is sit back and let him speak, let's hear him out. you are innocent until proven guilty in this country. >> sean: you were his high school girlfriend. this is the time that all these allegations are being made. you stated obviously you've known him all this time. did you ever hear any of this? is this the person you knew? >> never. the very first accusation, the alleged attack by dr. florida, i was surprised and skeptical, i

didn't believe it. and the more recent accusations are absolutely preposterous. it didn't fit with anything even remotely close to brett kavanaugh or our high school life. >> sean: so many high school, college, law school and bush administration, all these peopl people. >> five or six, they never actually went to their friends, they interview your neighbors, go back to people in high school and college and interview your employers, and none of that came out. none of that in five or six of those investigations. >> sean: tammy, when you look at professor ford, i don't have a problem being heard. the people that she mentioned it, they all contradict her story. and then if you look at the new yorker piece, which you should never have printed, even

"the new york times" said that miss ramirez in that particular case was calling people from yale. and they talked to dozens of people and said, do you remember it? i'm not sure. and then you have this allegation. so we are going to believe that somebody went to one party, gan gang, drug and women, inebriate inebriated, guys lining up to rape girls and align, do you believe that? >> no one is. and that's a problem. there are people that have not been heard, and that is our struggle with women. many of whom come up the majority who have not experienced sexual assault, and we make different twists about how to handle those things but we work for generations to be taken seriously. senator feinstein and the democrats, supposedly the champions for women with this

process have denigrated all of us. now look, of all of the allegations, perhaps professor ford's was the most plausible but, when her own witnesses said it had not happened or contradicted, this is the thing that all three accusations had in common. no specifics, no corroboration, or in fact even a contradiction, and the inability to corroborat corroborate. >> julie swetnick goes to ten parties allegedly while she's in college come up to high parties where women are gang rape ed. she doesn't report it to anybod anybody. dr. ford in addition, when you read her biography in "the washington post," it's a shock fest. she is a very troubled woman with a very troubled past. it's a figment of her

imagination. >> sean: what should republicans do? >> they all should all shut up and ask all those republicans and senators. >> that's a good idea. >> i don't want to see a single republican senator ask a question. >> i absolutely agree. we need to hear them out and we need to hear judge kavanaugh speak. the whole thing is outrageous, none of it is true and brett will be okay. >> sean: how long did you date him? >> two months. >> we have a lot to get to tonight. from the sewer democrats who are the stench is horrible. we have the latest on the kavanaugh hearing tomorrow morning. when we come back, we will hear from mark meadows and jim jordan as we continue from d.c. stay with us. ♪ if you have psoriasis, ...

little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats moderate to severe plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla . it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with... ...an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have  a history of depression or suicidal thoughts,... ...or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. "have you lost weight?" of course i have- ever since i started renting from national.

because national lets me lose the wait at the counter... ...and choose any car in the aisle. and i don't wait when i return, thanks to drop & go. at national, i can lose the wait...and keep it off. looking good, patrick. i know. (vo) go national. go like a pro. jushis local miracle ear t at helped andrew hear more of the joy in her voice. just one hearing test is all it took for him

to hear more of her laugh... and less of the background noise around him. for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter. just one free hearing test could help you hear more... laughter...music...life... call now for your free hearing test from an industry leader: miracle-ear.

>> sean: at joining us now with the latest on judge kavanaugh, the controversy in the hearing tomorrow, fox news washington correspondent kristin fisher. i get to see you in person. >> thank you so much. there have been a lot of big hearings over the last two years but this one may be the biggest. you have a lifetime appointment with the supreme court hanging in the balance in at least two new accusers coming out today. one is totally anonymous. judge kavanaugh is denying all of them. this calls it the twilight zone. she claims she was drugged and gang raped at a party 35 years ago. he also promised to keep an open

mind. >> president trump: believe it or not, i'm going to see what said. it's possible that they are convincing. and the results and there is the handwritten calendar from when he was 17 years old. it puts him at places like the beach and baseball games but his attorney say, not at a party like the one that ford describes. that's a problem when you're dealing with claims from 36 years ago, is not a lot of hard evidence. >> it's obviously problematic in every case. >> sean: joining us now with the reaction is the host of cr t's levine tv, the host right here on fox news channel, the number one show on sunday night

by far. we call him the great one, mark live in. let me throw it right to you. i've been doing radio 30 years, i've been at the fox news channel since october 1996, it's never been this awful and it's been bad a lot of times. >> a couple things here, first of all notice there is no blue dress here. out of these three accusers, there's not a single eye witness. there's not a single corroborating witness, not a single shred of evidence so that's what they have in common. no case. that's exactly why does democratic they believe that only the senate judiciary committee. no due process and no presumption of innocence because i have to make that case. the democrats, the lawyers and

operatives, the senator is all scheming in the shadows, they come up with nothing tangible or concrete. the reason they blow this off as a court of law is because that's how totalitarians think. you have people that make accusations, and this isn't about women's rights. there are millions and millions of women out there many of them watching your show. my wife, my mother, my daughter, my stepdaughter, my mother-in-law and so forth who don't believe in this. there are tens of thousands of women who find this entire spectacle, it's a roman colosseum and they are throwing them to the lines. liberals don't speak to women. did bill clinton speak for all the women he sexually assaulted? i don't think so. people keep saying brett kavanaugh had six fbi background investigations. how many background investigations did ms. ford have?

zero. what about the other accusers? how many background investigations did they have? zero. it's very interesting to me that all things left-wing democrat lawyers who represent these accusers, they know where the montgomery county police department is and they haven't walked a single one of their clients into that law enforcement office to file a complaint against mr. cavanaugh. they keep talking about the fbi. if you know where it is, don't you go ahead and file your complaints there? and i will tell you you why because then the rule of law actually kicks in. i'm starting to wonder about the senate judiciary committee. they are either filled with perverts or totalitarians, it's one or the other. they are gleeful ants exciting and salivating all over this. it's a disgusting spectacle. and, another thing i want to mention which is this, this lady

comes forward and politico reports he doesn't believe a word she says. michael avenatti is back, the slip and fall lawyer. the democrats embrace him and embrace the argument. ms. ramirez did not want to come forward. the democrats staff goes and finds her and drags her forward, and and i've never understood this dr. ford issue. she wanted to remain private so where did she go to "the washington post"? now here's the thing. i keep hearing all over television, i want to hear what dr. ford has to say. of course, we all want to hear what dr. ford has to say. she has a phd and an allegation against another human being. she needs to be crossed

examination cross-examined aggressively. and the four people she mentions say, that's not true. ms. ford needs to be questioned and thoroughly. and i want the american people to understand something, this entire process from bork to clarence thomas, and the rest up to now, as been hijacked. look at the democrats on this committee, it's the most radical bunch imaginable. you have jill brand, einstein, durbin, kamala harris, booker, all from dark blue states. one party states who are trying to appeal the most radical crazies in their party. we need to stand up to this. >> sean: mark 11, thank you. can you imagine that, ten parties, boys lining up and

drugging women, no one ever said anything and it have been more weekends? unbelievable. we will have more of this when we continue. when we come back, ed henry, congressman jim jordan and congressman mark meadows and the latest on all this and much more. also, rush's take on the event straight ahead. ♪ s squaring off against whatever comes next. they defied the law of gravity and went faster and farther than any one of them had ever imagined. they learned what it takes to power a dream. someone before them had discovered america, but they discovered what it means to be an american. and the thing about discovery, it has a beginning but no end. the next era belongs to those who discover again,

what it means to be an american. those who have the resourcefulness, the ingenuity and the grit to ensure the next energy to power our dreams will be american energy.

they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/try and never go to the post office again!

>> sean: we continue from washington night and ed henry has been pouring over these transcripts and has found some things. >> some news outlets running fall sleep tonight with a report of a fifth accuser against brett kavanaugh involving an alleged sexual assault in rhode island in 1985. we've checked it out and it's

bogus. starting with democratic senator sheldon whitehouse, the humanly opposed to a kavanaugh, he got a phone call from a rhode island constituents who confirmed on sunday in rhode island on 1985 a close friend was sexually assaulted on a boat by two men named brett and mark. the men claimed one of the men was kavanaugh. he called the senator's office after recognizing kavanaugh's yearbook photos and news reports. we got the transcript as you said and just months ago, kavanaugh declared he has never been on a boat in newport saying it is completely made up or at least, not me. we called the man at the senator's office who has a twitter account and he tweeted, recanted because i made a mistake and i apologize. the same man called for a military coup against president trump and accused the president of manslaughter. if that gives you an idea of the

onslaught that kavanaugh is facing, the idea of those that are flying around, and, he he's commanding he comes testify with us. we have congressman mark meadows in north carolina and congressman from ohio jim jorda jordan. that news quickly, we will get your comments quickly. i don't even know where to begin with what is now unfolding. >> that the clerk for judge kavanaugh and she's the daughter, probably of some of our best friends in college. judge kavanaugh flew to our wedding. he's a good man and he should be

on the court and we know he is eminently qualified and the right guy for the job. i hope it happens sooner rather than later. >> what happens in the senate, you know these guys may be too well >> i think we will hear both sides, but i think the tactics that we are talking about are really distasteful to both sides. when we really look at this, i got a readout that is coming from some of the activists and they are telling them how to act and what to wear. quite frankly coaching them on what to say and these are people that literally do not have a stake in this. they are organized by certain groups to come out and create chaos. what we need are real hearings and let judge kavanaugh set up for it. >> sean: let me ask you both about rod rosenstein. the president commented about that today and said he has been speaking with rod. you both know him. he says he didn't do it and mccabe is one of the ones obviously, his notes were leaked and he's known to live.

what do you think? >> the president's statement is consistent with where he's been. obviously has never wanted to fire rod rosenstein. >> sean: i think it's i trap myself. >> while the thing is this president is all about transparency. and here we are today, rod said he didn't say it, i think he needs to come in before congress and raise his right hand and swear. i can tell you there are a number of things that jim and i both know about that rod didn't say and he really need some accountability. >> do we really want in this country the guy who is in effect running the justice department and talking about recording the commander in chief's conversation? by the way, this is the same guy who wrote the memo for firing comey, who signed the third fisa and the same guy i believe according to press reports from fox news prior to house intelligence committee member

because they were trying to get information that i think we were entitled to. he had better come in front of congress and answer the questions. >> what about the president? >> here's the interesting thing. you know jim and i have been talking about rod rosenstein, the doj and fbi for months and months. the only way for the american people to judge as to declassify these documents and get them out. let's do the three oh two ohr interviews, because you know what? it would be very illuminating and we would know very quickly -- >> sean: is there any chance, does the president mentioned to foreign countries. is there any chance they've farmed out violating the amendment or the constitution? why are you laughing? >> you are over the target, let's put it that way. >> lots of information we need to save as soon as possible. >> sean: thank you both for what you are doing. when we come back, rush limbaugh weighs in on the kavanaugh latest allegations as we

continue. you can smell the stench right here in the studio, we are in the nation's capital, d.c. ♪yo st pump! your real bike's all fixed. man, you guys are good! well, we are the number-one motorcycle insurer in the country. -wait. you have a real motorcycle? and real insurance, with 24-hour customer support. arcade game: wipeout! oh! well... i retire as champion. game hog! champion. i'm a fighter. always have been. when i found out i had age-related macular degeneration, amd, i wanted to fight back. my doctor and i came up with a plan. it includes preservision. only preservision areds 2 has the exact nutrient formula recommended by the national eye institute to help reduce the risk of progression of moderate to advanced amd. that's why i fight. because it's my vision. preservision.

also, in a great-tasting chewable. little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats moderate to severe plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla . it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with... ...an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have  a history of depression or suicidal thoughts,... ...or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. if you're waiting patiently for a liver transplant, it could cost you your life. it's time to get out of line with upmc. at upmc, living-donor transplants put you first.

so you don't die waiting. upmc does more living-donor liver transplants than any other center in the nation. find out more and get out of line today. since you're heading off to dad... i just got a zerowater. but we've always used brita. it's two stage-filter... doesn't compare to zerowater's 5-stage. this meter shows how much stuff, or dissolved solids, gets left behind.

our tap water is 220. brita? 110... seriously? but zerowater- let me guess. zero? yup, that's how i know it is the purest-tasting water. i need to find the receipt for that. oh yeah, you do. when you rent from national... it's kind of like playing your own version of best ball. because here, you can choose any car in the aisle, even if it's a better car class than the one you reserved. so no matter what, you're guaranteed to have a perfect drive. [laughter] (vo) go national. go like a pro. see what i did there?

♪ >> sean: earlier today, interestingly, rush limbaugh reassessed one of his protections that we happened to air monday on this program. he said republicans did not confirm kavanaugh, they could "guesstimate terms goodbye" in the wake of the latest accuser, rush said this today. >> the outrage was originally going to be at republicans were caving to all of this but now we are past that. one of the things i believe it is truly happening, i think fence-sitters, and casual news consumers, people that are not ideologically involved like you and i are, people that aren't so called news junkies, i think they are watching this and i think they are just getting livid because this is so far outside the bounds of what even our degraded politics has come

to be, in terms of normal. this is so even beyond that. >> sean: and 41 days, rush is right, you have all the power. this is insanity. we'll always be fair and balanced. let not your heart be troubled. laura is in the neck studio. we were back in d.c. tomorrow. how are you? >> laura: i thought you were up in the rain. you can weather any storm. you are supposed to be up there. now you are in the cozy studio right next to me. >> sean: why are you being so mean? i just said laura is next, let not your heart be troubled, she has the latest, breaking news, don't miss laura's show. then you trash me every night. what is up without it? >> laura: sisterly-brotherly love. sean, great show tonight. you are buying to margaritas later. gotta get ready for tomorrow's hearing. welcome to "the ingraham angle." i more anchorman washington. we are 12 hours away from one of the most anticipated senate hearings in history.