show thanks to all of you for watching i am paul gigot hope o to see you right here next week. judge jeanine: breaking tonight, president trump stands strong amid the kavanaugh controversy with a rousing rally in west virginia. i'm jeanine pirro. thanks for making justice number one last weekend and "liars, leakers, and liberals" is still on the "new york times" best sellers list. we'll hear from president trump from his rally in west virginia that just broke up. i'll be joined live here in new york in a "justice" exclusive by

republican devin nunes and conservative commentator, michelle malkin and dan bongino and more. you -- you watched it here live, the president of the united states in a packed crowd in a raucous rally taking on his opponents and touting a long list of accomplishments. president trump: a vote for judge kavanaugh is a vote to reject the ruthless, outrageous tactics of the democratic party. democrats are spent every minute trying to rover turn the results of the last election -- trying to overturn the results of the last election. it's like part of your job description. get up and fight down. honestly the democrats are a

disgrace. they are. they are a disgrace. [cheers and applause] and the number one enabler of the democrats is the fake news media right back there. when i say and come out with very, very strong statements about media, i'm talking about the fake news media. they are truly an enemy of the people. the fake news enemy of the people. they really are. they are so bad. you don't even get. you would think they would like low taxes and a strong military. no crime, strong borders. they don't. they don't. this move 6 you have a chance to reject these disgraceful political hacks. but you can only do it -- you have got to vote republican. we have good people. they have been taken so far left where pocahontas is considered a

conservative in the democrat party. she is like a conservative person. pocahontas. elizabeth warren, she is considered like a conservative person. these people have gone crazy. they have gone loco. how about cory booker. did you watch the performance? he ran newark, new jersey into the ground. now he wants to be president, right? what was the moment he said he had? i don't think so. i think we take kirk douglas in his prime, don't we? judge jeanine: yes. more from the president's rally throughout the hour. but first my open. is it just a he said-she said? is it really that simple? and why is this now in the hands of the fbi?

why? because the establishment republicans are buckled, caused and bowed to the democrats or should i say demon rats. the spectacle i saw this week was one of the most of pathetic, disheartening, saddest displays to which this nation has ever stood witness. it was for all intents and purposes a crucifixion of a man who led the kind of exemplary life knew of us can mirror. i was a felony court judge. i was a prosecutor and d.a. sex crimes against women and children were my crusade. i assessed whether cases should go forward, if the accused should be convicted and as a judge what the sentence should be. no one sympathizes more than i when it comes to women who are

the silent victims of crimes. i created the first domestic violence section in the nation. chris teen nation. -- christine blasey ford is a lovey lady and i believe something happened to her. but she is in over her head and she is being used. no matter how many hippocampus brain comparisons she made. she couldn't remember the fundamentals, whose house it was, where it was, how she got to the house or how she got home. she went 36 years without telling anyone before now. if ford said no one was there, that it was just she and kavanaugh and just he and she alone in the parking lot, then it's a true he said-she said. but once she chose to say there

were four people there it's a they said. yet all four of they said something happened. they weren't there. they don't know what she is talking about. what does that tell you about ford's memory? if they weren't there, is it possible kavanaugh wasn't there either? crucial here is ford's therapy visit in 2012. for the first time in three decade she says she mentioned kavanaugh's name. if true, why was the name kavanaugh not in the therapist notes. and why would ford's lawyers with hold those therapist notes, at least the part that referred to this alleged event. why was ford so evasive when questioned by the prosecutor on

this issue. why did her attorney interfere with her answering in her testimony on this point. the message used to help her recall whatever traumatic event occurred. if a rape victim undergoes hypnosis the court and jury is entitled to know. because of the risk like television, newspapers, that impact one's memory, it is not a reliable means refreshing one's recollection. her attorneys said she was afraid to fly and had to drive across the country. but she was never told the committee was willing to come to her. she is not afraid to fly. she has flown all over the country, the world, the south

pacific and hawaii. move all of that out of the way. what we are dealing with here is hypocrisy. not what's right and wrong, who's guilty and innocent. this is about people desperate to win at all costs. take a man and his family down, no problem. it's the battle of the hypocrites. jeff flake is the perfect example. he says after the hearing he's going to vote for kavanaugh. but the man buckles after two women scream at him while preventing his elevator door from closing. >> look at me when i'm talking to you. you are telling me my vote doesn't matter. what happened to me doesn't matter. judge jeanine: of course it matters. but what does your abuse have to do with brett kavanaugh? hundreds of thousands of women have been abused in this country. take your anger out on the person who abused you. go to court, convict him, send

him to jail, spit on him, i don't care. but don't you dare blame brett kavanaugh for your victimization. only when jeff flake is dumb enough, weak enough to not even get. cory booker the wannabe spartacus has the gal t -- the o stand up and criticize. berke admits groping another young woman when he was 15. why aren't we going after him. and gnats genius -- that genius senator maizie hirono who allegedly graduated from high school. skipped the presumption of innocence class.

when you have the nerve to say the republicans tossed out the rules. you are the one who declared kavanaugh guilty before you heard any defendant money because she was the accuser and all men should shut up. and you are saying all conservatives are not entitled to the presumption of innocence? who are you? but my favorite, dianne feinstein. madame, you don't deserve to be in the united states senate. and no one can believe anything you have to say. each of these allegations should be investigated by the fbi. judge jeanine: two days ago you called for an fbi investigation. what a shock. why didn't you ask for it in july when you got the ford letter? you didn't ask for it because around hypocrite. no, like a chess shir a chessshu

sat on it. christine ford didn't want to be exposed. but, no, you had other plans. your plan was to like the. you actually gave ford the name of the drem krat attorney. boor dr. ford, there is woman doesn't know she was nothing more than a puppet on the string of democratic politics. dianne, where is your integrity. you and everyone in the senate know how this should have been hand. confidentially. the fbi should have been involved. no one has respect for you. in the end lindsey graham said it best. >> there is no way to investigate something that happened 35 years ago when you can't tell the month, the location. this is not about get together truth. judge jeanine: that's the

opening statement. if you like my opening statements, you will love my new book "liars, leakers and liberals" which i shamelessly try to advance on this show. joining me now in a "justice" explosive, we have a lot to get to, california congressman house intel committee chairman devin nunes. it's a pleasure to have you here in new york. i want to go to what the president was saying. he had a lot to say about the letter that was leaked on dr. ford. one feinstein had. let's take a look at this for a second. president trump: remember dianne feinstein. did you leak? [crowd boos] president trump: web her answer? did you leak the document? uh, uh, what?

no, uh, no, i didn't leak -- well, wait one minute. oh, oh, no, we didn't leak. judge jeanine: your take on that. >> what you are seeing is the collapse of institutions in this country. it's really concerning. when you take a supreme court justice and you have senators talking about high school yearbooks, you are watching the collapse of the senate. collapse of the republic. it's really dangerous. judge jeanine: what about feinstein and her role. all this stuff is suppose to be handled. she questioned him. the senate had the opportunity. >> she had a responsibility to share that with republicans. and second she should have made sure that the fbi knew about that if they were doing an additional background check. judge jeanine: is there a

kickback for her, a political kickback before she releases it to chairman grassley, the senate judiciary, she gets a lawyer for the woman. >> judge kavanaugh said it best. he american should look at his testimony. his testimony was amazing. every american should watch it. he talked about the scheme that they all had working together. it was clear you had outside groups funding an attack on him. and they knew many outside groups knew they were going to drop this bomb because it was their last-second chance to stop kavanaugh from becoming a supreme court justice. if that happens and you have got all kind of accusations and gonld knows what will come out in the next week here. judge jeanine: the insistence that the fbi investigate. if the first six fbi

investigations didn't indicate anything, how is this one going to be a better one? >> i don't even know where the fbi would start. she gave her testimony, so i doubt there is any more than that. all the people have sworn which would be a crime. so you have no witnesses, you don't know the location. how do you even start to investigate this. judge jeanine: she hasn't asked the maryland police for which there is no a cute of limitations, to investigate it. what do you think of that? >> how will the police investigate it? no one can investigate this. judge jeanine: she doesn't want it versus quited. >> supposedly she didn't want her name out in the public. there is a whole group of people coordinating this effort inside the senate with the democrats and on the outside with the left wing groups with the media trailing behind. judge jeanine: what's going to

happen with heidi height cam and murkowski and collins? >> i believe the senators in the red states, if they don't vote to confirm kavanaugh, i think they will be in trouble from this election. republicans are happy with the economy. every american should be happy with the economy. but what you are seeing is finally republicans are waking up -- everybody thought this was a joke. but they are starting to see now because of the situation judge kavanaugh is in what many of us have been dealing with the last two years. judge jeanine: i want to know where we are in the fisa warrant investigation, when are we going to see accountability from people in law enforcement and the deep state. we'll get answers when "justice" rolls on in a moment. plus more on the kavanaugh controversial as dan bongino and chris hahn watched the hearings

just like the rest of us. conservative commentator michel malkin joins us. we are back in a

>> the he tire nation has witnessed the shameless conduct

of the democrat party. they are willing to throw away every standard of decency, justice, fairness and due process to get their way. they don't care how they get it. you see it happening before your eyes. i think it's' an incredible thing that's happening. i hope you don't sit home because bad things will happen if you sit home. judge jeanine: president trump doubles down on the democrats in tonight's rally in west virginia. one of those republicans running is house intel chairman devin nunes who is back with me in part two of this "justice" exclusive. chairman nunes you were the topic of a lot of headlines and discussion on television as it related to the memo and investigation of the fisa warrant. the president said he was going to declassify the information

relating to that. and i must tell you personally everyone i spoke to across the country wants this declassified. declassify it, no redaction. he said i'm going to give it to the inspector general. what happened? >> i'm guessing many people who don't want this out went to the white house and had a sheeting and told the president a lot of things that weren't true like our allies don't want this out which is a ridiculous tape. how would the allies even know what's in a fisa warrant. i think the president got spooked on this. he'll turn it over to have the i am g. look at it. -- we worked so hard to get this information out to the american people. we want full transparency. why it's so important is this gets to the understand policy that remember strzok and page were talking about?

we believe this was the understand policy. and you have people saying it wasn't the dossier it wasn't the dossier that was used. and it wasn't the fake news story. it's all that stuff behind the redaction. what's behind those redactions the american people do need to know about. judge jeanine: they are worried about sources and methods and national security. is this connected to rod rosenstein? he's fired or he's not fired. there is a meeting, there is not a meeting. is this rosenstein applying leverage? it seems he's the one who is going to fall. >> i don't know yes was involved in this process. he should not be advising the president on this. everybody in congress, the speaker, the leader, the whip,

the whole intelligence committee, nearly every republican called for these documents to be declassified. jean where the president -- judge jeanine: the president changed his mind. >> if rosenstein was involved in that process, it should be a dismiss after that meeting. whenever we move to get things declassified they say we are going to ruin national security. what happens every time? the stuff comes out and it makes the department of justice, the fbi and gps and they all look bad. judge jeanine: there is nothing that -- i could have impaneled a grand jury without inspector general giving me a 500-page report. what is the i.g. doing?

>> the i.g. is fine. great. the i.g. is going to look at it. we are a separate branch of government. we created the department of justice. we haver right to see that information. we have decided the american people need to see the information. the president wants the american people to see the information. how is it possible this can be held up? i think all they are trying to do is stall until after the mid-terms. but we are right at the end. we have 20 pages of the content, which is the insurance policy. we have the bruce ohr 302s. this is bruce ohr's wife was working for the clinton campaign as this was being furnled into the fbi to investigate the trump campaign. so why would we still be here nearly a month away from the elections and we still can't get transparency out to the american

people? o -- so the president has to do something. >> i heard he watches the show. thank you so much for being here. it's an honor to have you here in our studio. a law enforcement expert still on deck with a look at the testimony of brett kavanaugh's accuser. we all watched the same hearing but you can get dan won gin know and chris hahn came away wititit oh! oh! ♪ ozempic®! ♪ (vo) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than seven and maintained it. oh! under seven? (vo) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (vo) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death.

oh! no increased risk? ♪ ozempic®! ♪ ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ (vo) ask your healthcare provider if ozempic® is right for you.

now back to "justice with judge jeanine." president trump: the democrat party. when you see democratic party, that's wrong. they should probably change the name if you think about it. they call them the democratic party. the democrat party is radical socialism, venezuela, and open borders. it's now called to me, you never heard this before. the party of crime. it's a party of crime. judge jeanine: president trump taking shots at the left in a rousing rally in west virginia. joining me, my favorite political panel dan bongino and chris hahn. the party of crime. dan bongino, why would the

president call the democrats the party of crime? >> because they are. in the last few years what have we witnessed from the democrat party up on the hill. a spying scandal with the weaponization of the intelligence community to take their their political opponent. you see democrats advocating for open borders and uncontrolled immigration despite crime consequences. now they have become not only the party of crime but the party of character assassination as they try to take down judge kavanaugh in what was an abomination of a week for the democrats. i'm disbusted disgusted for them. >> in january you will be calling them the majority party. and they will be calling comey,

gates, flynn. now they have a justice who doesn't have the temperament. lies about little things. judge jeanine: ways he lying about -- what is he lying about? >> renate -- judge jeanine: are we going to use a yearbook? >> i'm talking about this testimony from thursday where he lied about the means of his yearbook. judge jeanine: do you know the means of what was in his yearbook. >> yes, i do. it's and reference to a movie, animal house. judge jeanine: what are you talking about? say it fast. reference to animal house. he admitted they were animal house fans.

>> renate is a similar reference in that movie. >> listen, man, generally you are a pretty good guy. but i'm being dead serious with you, this is disgusting. this isn't funny. this guy is a dedicated public servant. i let you talk. you are impugning the character of a good man. on a national cable television show you are impugning the character of a good man just like everybody else. pipe down. i let you talk, and say the ridiculous absurdities. you are obligated to let me respond. you have disgraced yourself doing this and throwing yourself in with this disgusting episode this week. this is a father, a dedicated public servant, a basketball coach and this is someone's son. you have absolutely zero evidence what you are saying is

true other than the fact you watched animal house 20 years ago. i'm disgusted. you should be embarrassed. >> i watched it last night. why lie about ralph club and say the was his stomach. nobody would write that on a yearbook. >> how do you know that? >> he lied about little things, his character is not good for the court and he'll be pulled by the end of the week. don't worry. there are other conservatives you can put on the bench and you will get your pick. but not this. judge jeanine: your party, they are like cheshire cats sitting on this information saying if we can't stop him now we'll bring in three women. you want to trash him, i believe something happened to christine blasey ford and she is being

used by you demon rats. everybody is using her. you want to say he lied because of his yearbook? >> he lied about ralph club. judge jeanine: what is ralph club. >> judge. i want to you explain it. judge jeanine: both of you stop. what else it, chris. you tell me. what is it. >> it's a cluive people throwing up for overdrinking. judge jeanine: big deal. they talk about flatulence and throwing up. were you always an adult before you allegedly got to be an adult? >> he lied about it. >> here is the difference between me and you. i'm not a liar. when i'm wrong i admit it.

admit you have no idea what judge kavanaugh meant when he wrote ralph club in his book. you are just lying because you want to take an innocent man down because your party is evil. they are bad people. you are on the wrong side of the moral arc of history. you should tweet out an apology to everybody watching this show for this disgraceful appearance. judge jeanine: do you think dianne feinstein was right in leaking this things out and lying and then saying, you know what? i don't know, my staff didn't leak it? you didn't ask anyone? no, you didn't leak it. how naive are you? >> i think she should have given this information to the president the minute she got it and maybe he wouldn't have nominated this guy. this guy will be a problem. judge jeanine: the american people will answer you in the

november election. >> yes, they will. judge jeanine: i have got to tell you, i don't know if you were in tears, but a lot of people including me were in tears. more on brett kavanaugh and his accuser's

judge jeanine: it was the testimony that gripped much of the nation. let's talk more by the with conservative commentator, michelle malkin. i understand you were listening to the interview with won gin he an --with bongino and hahn. >> there was a lot of talk about ralph clubs and the attack on judge kavanaugh and his character not only by mr. hahn, but the entire resistance

movement in beltway, hollywood, across deemia. it makes me wants to ralph. i am especially ashamed of so many women who should knowb better. -- who should know better. they know what it's like to fight for five, 10, 15, 20 years to clear innocent men's names. you are a veteran of the criminal suls i -- justice syst. and you have seen so many times. people lie. people are capable of lying about all sorts of things. this idea that accuser christine blasey ford seems sincere, of course anyone who is a veteran of the criminal justice system knows you can seem you are telling the truth when you are lying through your teeth.

judge jeanine: i listened to her and i believe something happened to her, but i think her memory is so repressed and i want to know why all of a sudden now. this was worse than bourke, this was worse than clarence thomas. why is it republicans are always at the end of the most of vicious, brutal attacks. now people like flake are buckling to let's do an fbi investigation like after 6 they are going to figure out something more on the 7th. >> it's a disgrace. i wish last week would have ended on the high note of finally saying what needed to be said. i wish his words penetrated the clouded mind of jeff flake which rhymes with snake. it's no surprise he acted the way he didn't he has become the enabler of the resistance

movement. it was the job of the senate republicans to do their job and support their president and this nominee. what's at stake in the supreme court are life and death matters. and we have jeff flake folding like a stack of cards. judge jeanine: it's an additional delay and delay and delay. the show is so packed, i haven't spent a lot of time talking about this. i felt terrible for kavanaugh, his wife, and his mother. you are not a serial predator for one year and for the next 30 years you don't touch a woman. no one is genius enough to find owl three women -- all three women who had a repressed memory and didn't say anything for 35 years. >> i think much more needs to be

investigations how each of these accusers suddenly appeared, and what is the plot and conspiracy, i will call it that, between senator feinstein's office, the judiciary committee staffers, the "new yorker" and prosecutors like the one here in colorado. that debra ramirez case raises a lot of eyebrows, the prove fence the provenance of that. judge jeanine: more from the president in west virginia. president trump: we fixed a lot of wall. it's not the easiest thing because the democrats know it's the thing we really want. it's very much of a signature it's a big part of what we talk about. they get in the way. i know it for a fact. they said we can't -- we'll get

things that are actually military. 700 billion and $716 billion. we get that. a wall is a tiny thing by comparison but they want to fight that wall for political purposes. but we are building it. we are going to finish it. my name is jeff sheldon, and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders

i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

i'm ready to crush ap english. i'm ready to do what no one on my block has done before. forget that. what no one in the world has done before. all i need access, tools, connections. high-speed connections. is the world ready for me? through internet essentials, comcast has connected more than six-million low-income people to low-cost, high-speed internet at home. i'm trying to do some homework here. so they're ready for anything.

judge jeanine: over the past week or two you may have found yourself asking questions about how someone can make an accusation about someone from or 30 years without corroboration or evidence. i am joined by the former president of the national d.a.'s association and a dear friend of mine. we were d.a.s for many years. billy, would i be correct in assume can you and your office interviewed and prosecuted tens of thousands of sex crimes victims. >> i have been a prosecutor for almost 40 years, so very fair to say. judge jeanine: would you have filed charges on christine blasey ford's behalf?

>> no ethical prosecutor could bring a case because of the lack of specificity of time place and date. judge jeanine: i call it the who, what, when, and how. but that is a prohibitor. we hear this prosecutor come in. you and i tried many cases. you more than i at this point. i didn't like her. i didn't like her approach, i didn't like the behavior. what do you think? >> well, i happen to be very fond of rachel and i'm close friends with her boss. but what i would have focused on would be the visit to the therapist in 2012 by dr. ford. people are struggling with this conundrum, how can two people be so credible when one of them has to be lying. the answer may be neither one of

them are lying. what happened in that therapist office is a memory was recovered by some means, possibly hypnosis as you suggested in your opening statement and that makes it absolutely inadmissible in the state of new york and maryland and most of states in the union. the reason being, hypnosis can often cause co confabulation the creation of a false memory that the victim believes is true. something happened to dr. ford. we can't say what happened. but i was troubled by not pinpointing how is it she is able to identify brett kavanaugh as her attacker. judge jeanine: the resistance on the part of the attorneys to allow the senate to look at the notes with the therapist, the lie detector test before

everything was revealed gives me the sense there was a whole plan here. i don't have you on to discuss that, but more the reality that there are people out there who are honest in their claims but just can't be specific enough. >> yeah. i prosecuted the lead case in new york 35 years ago. a woman was brutally raped. for no months and months she couldn't identify her assailant. we finally went to him know is and she was able to identify her assailant and he was convicted but that case was reversed. the coast appeals said it's not reliable. you can't cross-examine somebody who believes they are telling the truth because of a false memory created by hypnosis. judge jeanine: you think that's a probability? >> i think it's a possibility.

i would be more favorable to that possibility if the lawyers do not agree to release those therapist notes. at the very least they should be given to a third party to neutrally examine. judge jeanine: we'll be

judge jeanine: final tonight the president talked about the party of crime. if you want to read more about the party of crime, get a copy of my new book, the case against the antitrump conspiracy, number one new york times best seller and you can get your copy at amazon and barnes & noble. go to it now. remember, you never have to miss justice. if you can't watch, just set your dvr. i was at liberty university this week. and next weekend i'm going to show you a lot of great video from there. thanks for watching. i'm jeanine pirro, advocating for truth, justice and the american way. greg gutfeld is coming up. sesesesese

>> there's a lot to digest and we're chewing on all of it for you. let's get after it. noel francisco, great name. however no early christmas present for noel. should i stay or should i go? the clash between rosenstein and trump is in full effect. >> that noel joke was the worst thing ever written, but don't ever bring the clash into your sick ugly game, you freak. so pretty slow news week. [laughter] greg: i know, i know.