show thanks to all of you for watching i am paul gigot hope o to see you right here next week. . >> white house pushing back on reports of the president asked the fbi to limit the scope of its new investigation into sexual assault allegations against supreme court nominee, brett kavanaugh. sources confirming to fox news feed ministration was the bureau to focus on quote - credible and current accusations. hello and welcome to a brand-new hour and said "america's news headquarters". i am in for arthel neville. good to be with you. requested to be with you on this busy new we can. i am mike emanuel in four eric shawn. the president standing behind his supreme court nominee saindon fbi background check

could be a blessing in disguise. amid reports of limits on the scope of that check the white house saying it is up to the senate to set the terms. here is white house press secretary commissar sanders on fox news sunday. >> this can't become a fishing expedition like the democrats would like to see it be. we cannot allow the people that have acted in bad faith to determine and allow us to become a total fishing expedition by the fbi. the senate is going to layout, senate republicans will layout and dictate the terms. mike: white house correspondent joining us with development! how confident is the white house of the fbi will wrap up the investigation by the end of the week? reporter: let me say at the way sarah sanders said, they are convinced that this will not turn into a so-called fishing expedition. that said, i think the president is already pushing back at the notion that he believes democrats will be throwing out there this weekend that is no matter what happens

in the report there was simply not be satisfied. let me take you to twitter. the latest tweet, he's been fairly active on social media today. he said while, just our dear the democrats only thinking obstruct and delay are starting to put out the word that the time and scope of fbi looking to judge kavanaugh and witnesses, is not enough. hello! for them, it will never be enough. stay tuned and watch! that said, there is a standard operating procedure and there is also a specific protocol to be adhered to during the investigation. but this, i think they can barely see it's as much a political story as it is a legal one to be sure with the democrats already questioning again, the depth of the investigation given the brevity of the time allotted. >> these are serious allegations and we have been calling for an fbi investigation for what seems like months. these are not normal times. reporter: of course the investigation is a wrap up by

weekend. and a lot of us here will believe that when we see it. mike: also today we learned that a senior member of the white house team has suffered through her own me too moment. we can tell? crisis was pretty powerful to listen to. we're talking about senior counsel into the counselor, kelly on conway. remarking on the interesting and powerful testimony that we saw during the senate hearing at the end of last week. involving doctor ford. then kelly herself shared a personal story that came straight from the heart. listen here. >> is not the me too movement, i feel very empathetic, frankly, for victims of sexual assault and sexual harassment. and rape. i'm a victim of sexual assault. i do not expect judge kavanaugh or jeff flake or anybody, to be held responsible for that.

you have to be responsible for your own conduct. powerful moment there listening to kellyanne conway. as you also know, tomorrow, the high court begins a new session without judge kavanaugh. but if things go the way they hope the white house, he will join the others fairly soon. mike, of course a busy week here at the white house. if we get anything new between now and the end of the day i will pass it along to you. for now, back to you. mike: kevin, many thanks. from the brett kavanaugh nomination we go now to -- the white house and republicans do not want this probe to drag out. will they be able to hold firm on a one week deadline? >> that is a good question.i honestly do not know. if all they had to do was talk to the principles involved and not do a lot of follow up on corroborating evidence or lack

thereof, it is entirely conceivable the fbi can conclude the investigation in a week.but if you want a more extensive operation to find out if there's carpeting evidence either way so the stent has a better ability to decide to tell the truth, then you could imagine that investigation taking longer than a week. i would imagine that you know, a couple of weeks ought to be able to complete this. given the breadth of resources that the fbi has to throw at this and the importance of it. mike: meanwhile lindsey graham has of the questions you want answered? let's play the clip and then we will discuss. >> i am going to find out who in the feinstein staff recommended katz to be the lawyer for doctor ford. i will try to find out who betrayed doctor ford trust, to remain anonymous. there are three people and

groups at the p the person who sent this anonymous destroyed her trust, betrayed her trust to be anonymous they had a political agenda. i will get to the bottom of it. >> senator graham must know who is the leaker and what about recommending a law firm? your thoughts. >> well, after this whole confirmation issue is resolved one way or another, perhaps it would be worthwhile to get the answers to those questions for political purposes to decide whether the voters need to punish any of the senate democrats involved in the voting booth. but for the question of deciding the truth or falsity of the people that have testified before the senate in the kavanaugh confirmation i'm not sure these questions are that central. i don't think they are strictly legal but it may be a bit of a distraction in the short term. mike: let's listen to hawaii

democrat maisie hirono and discussed. >> he brings us to the crux of whether or not this fbi investigation is going to be thorough. i would think that that is what senator flake had in mind. every senate vote matters and there is time to get to the bottom of it. even if it is seven days, that is bad enough. for them to limit the fbi as to the scope and who they will question, that really -- i want to use the word farce but it is not the kind of investigation that all of us are expecting. mike: is a surprise to the democrats like hirono want the fbi to have no limit in terms of time or scope? >> with respect to scope, certainly, it is not a surprise. typically, the white house would not limit the scope of an investigation. they would give the fbi

discretion to you know, follow-up whatever leads they saw fit, interviewed whatever witnesses they saw fit, seek a corporation that they saw fit. in terms of the timing, i think it is debatable. i can certainly understand that the democrats think we should take as much time as possible. and that the republicans are going to be running out the clock and being -- making sure we don't get the information we need and rush to a vote. on the other hand i can see the republicans saying that the democrats no matter what, will say we need more time and it is never enough. i think some sort of balance has to be struck and probably the best party to strike that balance would be the fbi itself, free from any interference from either side. >> sources i've spoken with close to the confirmation process and they want to be about current and credible allegations. not a fishing expedition. does that make sense in your view?>> this except that the devil is in the details be what they mean by current and credible allegations, there are reports saying that the allegations of swetnick are off the table. that because he made unilateral

determination that they are not credible? i'm not sure p would allegations that judge kavanaugh perjured himself regarding secondary details about how heavy drinker he was and other matters not directly related to the sexual assault allegations. are they included in the current allegations? i think there's a little room for argument there and i think that is probably what's going on here in terms of the debate between the democrats and republicans. mike: take listen to two key senate republicans appearing this evening on 60 minutes. and we will talk about it. >> could either of you change your minds depending on what the fbi report comes up with? >> of course! i mean, of course. >> my mind is made up about brett kavanaugh. it would take a dynamite accusation because here's the deal, doctor ford, i don't know what happened but i know this, brett kavanaugh denied it vigorously. in her but she named could not

verify it. 36 years old, i do not see anything changing. mike: what are your expectations in terms of what the fbi will tell us on or around next friday? >> that is an excellent question, mike. i really don't even know. i mean certainly, we will hear this much of the same, people make the allegations will stick to their story and people that deny them will stick with their story. i think the real question here is will there be any corroborating evidence in one direction or another that the fbi can uncover that can shed light on this? that's what i'm going to be looking to see. as to the comments made by the senators, in your tape, thing is very revealing. those that think the truth or falsity of judge kavanaugh 's testimony regarding at least a sexual assault allegations or other things, they're going to say yes, my mind is open and i will be waiting to hear the results of the fbi investigation.

which is probably a regional tactic. >> your expectation about how relevant centers will react once they have the information should key moderates icons, flake, murkowski and democratic joe manchin iii from west virginia, heidi heitkamp, be more likely to vote yes? >> i think all of those votes are in play as you all have been reporting and a lot will depend on the details of the fbi investigation. unless the fbi uncovers either new allegations like the dynamite charge we heard referred to in a moment ago, or some fairly critical corroborating evidence for some of the accusers. unless the fbi finds out, then i suspect that the confirmation will go forward. i do not claim any expertise as a soothsayer. mike: i will put you on the spot. you expect judge kavanaugh will

be confirmed? >> you know -- [laughter] you are putting on the spot, mike! if you put a gun to my head and said make a prediction, i would say probably more likely than not. but these last few weeks have been so tumultuous and unexpected then i think anything is possible. mike: i'm getting back to d.c. for the roller coaster. thank you! >> thank you. molly: a mass burial burned after massive earthquake and tsunami killed almost a thousand people and the death toll is expected to climb much higher. a live report head. plus, the face-to-face between president trump and deputy attorney general, rod rosenstein may be delayed again. and the democrats are wanting president trump not to fire the doj number two.what to expect when that happens. that is ahead. >> i would much prefer keeping rod rosenstein, much prefer many people say have the right, he said he did not say it. he said he does not believe that. and nobody in this room

believes him. ♪ flintstones! meet the flintstones. ♪ ♪ they're the modern stone age family. ♪ ♪ from the town of bedrock. ♪ meet george jetson.

♪ ♪ his boy elroy. with instant acceleration, electric cars are more fun to drive and more affordable than ever. electric cars are here. plug into the present. with who we are as people and making everybody feel welcome. ordering custom ink t-shirts has been a really smart decision for our business. i love the custom ink design lab because it's really easy to use.

they have customer service that you can reach anytime. t-shirts help us immediately get a sense of who we are as a group. from the moment clients walk in, they're able to feel like part of the family. - [spokesman] custom ink has hundreds of products for your business and free shipping. upload your logo or start your design today at customink.com. upload your logo or start your design today what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. that's it? everybody two seconds! "dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your application, it is with great pleasure that we offer our congratulations on your acceptance..." through the tuition assistance program, every day mcdonald's helps more people go to college. it's part of our commitment to being america's best first job. >> new details on the highly

anticipated meeting between president trump and deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. white house press secretary sarah sanders saying the meeting could be delayed again after the two men were supposed to speak this past week. trey gowdy saying that there are a lot of questions that the doj number two must address. included from fbi director, andrew mccabe memos and reports that rosenstein proposed secretly recording the president. >> i need to see the memos. i need to ask rod what he said and i will get to what he meant. those may or may not be the same thing. i appreciate the president talking to him this week and we will talk to him. i want to know what he said and i want to know what he meant. mike: we are live in washington

with more. what has the president said about the deputy attorney general and what are democrats saying about all of this? >> well, there was speculate the president was going to fire rod rosenstein last week. but the united nations, the president said it was his preference not to. democrats are standing by the deputy attorney general, who has denied a new york times article that said he considered wearing a wire to record the president and that he brought up the topic of the 25th amendment with cabinet members. democrats say rosenstein removal now would tarnish the mueller investigation into russian collusion. >> rosenstein must stay there to defend the integrity of the investigation until it is finished, it is very important for the integrity of american democracy. >> there has been speculation that fired fbi deputy director, andrew mccabe, who is now the subject of a grand jury probe, may have been the source of the new york times story. two house committees have

averted the deputy attorney general to speak with them. something the chairman of the house oversight committee, trey gowdy, talked about on "sunday morning futures" earlier. >> rod deserves to be heard out. and i appreciate the president talking to him this weekend we are going to talk to him. i want to know what he said, then i want to know what he meant, i want to know whether anyone else was present for the meetings. if your case hinges on the credibility of andrew mccabe, good luck. >> mccabe's memos have now been subpoenaed by two committees with a deadline for the justice department of later this week. mike? >> the present and rosenstein were expected to meet last thursday when all eyes were on the kavanaugh hearing. when we did not meet. any word on when the meeting could take place? >> yeah, the white house has said because of the supreme court nomination hearings last week, the meeting was postponed and will continue to be postponed at the fbi has opened an investigation into judge brett kavanaugh. white house press secretary single "fox news sunday" that lately, the new york times article will not be the only

topic that the two men discussed. but that will have to wait. >> a date for that has not been set. it could be this week. i could see it pushing back another week given all of the other things that are going on. with the supreme court. >> likely, the meeting will be put off until kavanaugh is investigation is over and there is the possibility we could see rosenstein job stay right where it is through the midterms. mike? mike: lauren blanchard, thank you. molly: for more this is bringing in the senior writer at the weekly standard, eric, thank you for being here today to weigh in on this. i'm sure you can hear lauren there just reported, we don't exactly when the meeting will be if it will be this week or next week. but does the president essentially have a right to some of the answers he may be seeking and want to know if someone were wanting to wear wire or secretly record him or if there's any plot to somehow remove him from office.

do you think he deserves answers to all of those questions? >> absolutely. but i think he is wise to wait on it. you know, it is a measure of how much the kavanaugh confirmation firestorm has consumed all of the political oxygen in washington. that here we had the number two person at the department of justice that is alleged in a new york times article to have been talking about wearing a wire on the president. to be invoking the 25th amendment, which removes from incapacity, a president.yet, the story that was a bombshell when it came out, has kind of all but disappeared from sight as all things kavanaugh have taken over. >> it has been remarkable to see how quickly the news cycle has been changing in general. you know, the democrats and republicans are pretty far apart when it comes to rosenstein but here is a tweet this is from maxine water, democrat in california. she says rosenstein, don't quit, retire or resign. let donald trump fire you. if he does he will face the wrath of the american people.

democrats and republicans. now that is a lot to unpack and that one tweet. but when it comes to democrats and republicans, do you think they are deeply invested in whether rod rosenstein keeps his job? is there a difference between the average democrat and average republican might be thinking on the issue? >> of course, rod rosenstein his job cannot be removed from the question of robert mueller 's special counsel investigation which was begun by road rosenstein at about the same time he was talking about wearing the wire and invoking the 25th amendment as the new york times reported. if that is correct. i think this is something we republicans and democrats may have come a little bit closer on this which is your hearing from people like trey gowdy, that he wants to hear from rod rosenstein, he is not coming out and calling for rod rosenstein to be fired. i think there is a recognition that if he fires at this point, rod rosenstein, whatever his replacement is chosen, has to be confirmed at the senate judiciary committee. i do not think that the

president of the president's allies want to go back through another confirmation of the senate judiciary committee anytime soon. so it is a real disincentive there. >> the plate is rather full as you might say. democrats have also argued that rosenstein is essentially, you know, integrity when it comes to the mueller investigation. and that he is somehow, the preservation for that. the thing he has that kind of importance? >> you know, he certainly is an important figure in everything that's been going on in washington. but what's really interesting about for example, the number of times reporting on road rosenstein, was just how much rosenstein was kind of blowing with the wind, just how much he was driven by public opinion and kind of a weak opinion washington after james comey, the fbi director, was fired. in part because of a memo

written by rod rosenstein, arguing it would be a good thing to fire james comey. the backlash on that, rod rosenstein was caught by surprise. and his reaction was one that really suggested that he values elite opinion in washington tremendously. and may make his decisions based on what makes him look good. >> the president said last week, my preference would be to keep him, speaking of rosenstein. and let him finish up, that is his preference right now. how much weight does this conversation hold? the expected conversation, potentially happening this week and potentially at some point in the future? >> i think before things got riled with the kavanaugh hearings, that might have carried a lot of weight. i think at this point, the president is going to have rod rosenstein and he will have to find a reason not to fire him. he will find a reason not to suspend him and i think that is

very much in the president's interest at this point. and i think it is recognized by the white house that having a rosenstein firing issue to deal with is just one issue too many coming up to the elections. molly: thus the question is going to ask you. at the end, thank you for chatting with us. it would be a fascinating week ahead. >> thank you, molly. mike: ration pouring in from capital as the kavanaugh confirmation battle until the new phase. democrats are already say judge kavanaugh should recuse himself in certain cases if he is confirmed. how is all this going to impact the supreme court? plus, back-to-back natural disasters. killing nearly a thousand people in indonesia. and the death toll expected to rise. a live report on this desperate search for survivors. ♪

all the tools you need for every step of the way. make it, squarespace figuring it out... not that fun... and like my dad, you might want medicare supplement insurance, too. uh oh, more research.

no big thing. not with this website. unitedhealthcare insurance company created aarpmedicaresupplement.com to help make your decision easier.. with answers to important questions about aarp medicare supplement insurance plans, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like how this type of plan, also called a medigap plan, helps pay for some of what medicare doesn't. and how aarp medicare supplement plans are the only ones endorsed by aarp. selected for meeting their high standards of quality and service. and check this out. all you do is type in your zip code... and find rates for the aarp medicare supplement plans in your area. it's that easy. what you need is right here, including short videos that explain some of your medicare and medigap options. read about the key features of a medigap plan, too. like, this type of plan gives you the freedom to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. with no networks. and no referrals to see a specialist. use this site however you like,

whenever you like. if you're ready to go, apply anytime at all. or if you just want to learn more, ask for one of these. there's so much information out there online. this one site makes it simple. it's your guide... to help you decide! so, if you or someone you know is turning 65 soon, or thinking about a medigap plan, this is a great place to start. research a little. learn a lot. or just find rates for the aarp medicare supplement plans in your area. aarpmedicaresupplement.com hard to say... easy to use... and filled with great advice. just like your dad right? yeah, just like you, dad.

(vo) after the 1906 earthquake people needed access to their money. so even though bank records were buried, wells fargo let customers withdraw based on their word. we had your back then... ...and we've got your back today. now customers with direct deposit can benefit from overdraft rewind. an overdraft forgiveness feature, only from wells fargo. it's a new day at wells fargo. but it's a lot like our first day. molly: the number dead above

800 after two natural disasters strike an island in indonesia. rescue crews working feverishly to locate survivors from friday's magnitude 7.5 earthquake and subsequent tsunami. they feared the death toll could reach into the thousands. we are going to now with more on the aftermath. jackie? molly: the vice president of indonesia says they expect to find more victims. just today, 50 people were rescued from the rubble of a hotel. rescue efforts have been hampered by block and destroyed roadways, lack of equipment and the air force bringing supplies for survivors. 7.5 magnitude earthquake rocked the island on friday. triggering aftershocks and also 20 foot waves that put the coast underwater. the disaster affecting 2.4 million people. victims have been found alive in collapsed buildings and many dead are still buried under the

rubble. they say survivors left without food, clean water or shelter, hospitals are overwhelmed and working with electricity. many people are being treated outside. after the dead identify the government is conducting a mass burial citing health concerns. still, the president to urge people to stay where they are. >> there are several villages due to lack of heavy equipment that we cannot evacuate just yet. hopefully, the equipment will arrive tonight. will start evacuating victims that are still in the secluded locations. >> a spokesperson for the countries disaster management agency says there was no early warning, no emergency sirens and limited shelter and space preventing evacuations. many people were actually on the beach when the tsunami hit. now many cannot get off the island. the airport is closed and the nearest open airport is more than 10 hours away by heavily damaged roads. molly: thank you.

mike: meanwhile, the battle over the supreme court nominee, judge brett kavanaugh raising new questions over the future of the high court. democrats arguing kavanaugh is so partisan -- >> considering that he has totally shown himself to be the politically -- a political and partisan operative that he has been which as i said, is one of the reasons that his earlier confirmation was held up for three years. he revealed himself as partisan and i would think if i were a democrat, for him i would ask him to recuse himself. mike: meanwhile the son of antonin scalia telling fox news how his father might have reacted to this process. >> on a general level, it would be terribly surprised about the intensity surrounding the supreme court nomination. because so much of it comes down to roe versus wade. my father often said that with

roe versus wade in particular, but other cases as well, the court was really trying to come in and settle a cultural issue that should have been resolved in elections. mike: germany we have a constitutional attorney and educator. good to have you. >> thank you so much, i am glad to be here. mike: two of the moderate senators that teamed up for this fbi program 60 minutes i talked about how judge kavanaugh handled the testimony this week. check this out and i will have you weigh in. >> the statement at the beginning i thought was pretty raw. but in keeping with someone who has been unjustly accused. >> there were some lines that he delivered that were sharper, more partisan, more, this is the clintons, paying me back. this is democratic smear campaign. that i was surprised, struck to hear from a judicial nominee.

mike: judge kavanaugh was clearly fighting for his name and his integrity. your thoughts on how he handled himself the other day? >> you know, i think that what we are seeing here is the direct result of the fact that our nomination, our confirmation hearings have deviated from being constitutional confirmations to being political confirmations. we have senators asking politically driven questions rather than constitutional qualifications. and so now, we get to this point where you can have partisan politics directing questions at this man. that are completely and totally outrageous. and then expect him to respond in defense of his own character. i think that it is absolutely ridiculous. i think that is where we have come in society. the idea that kavanaugh should have to recuse himself before any democrat that comes before the supreme court is just ridiculous.

i mean seriously, does that mean that ginsberg needs to recuse herself when it comes to any gay marriage case or homosexual case given her direct and public opinions that she has based on the subject or that kagan must recuse herself from all healthcare issues? these are the kind of things that have driven our supreme court to becoming political rather than just the constitutional body that it was created to be. mike: you made reference to jerrold nadler who'd already suggested there will be investigations if judge kavanaugh is confirmed. and democrats win back the house. they are floating the idea of recusal spirit is at -- >> the whole hearing was about an assumption of guilt. the idea that we have senators telling kavanaugh that he needed to call for an fbi investigation, is absolutely ridiculous.

in america, we are innocent until proven guilty. kavanaugh doesn't need to call for his own investigation. those who are making the accusations, they are the ones with something to prove. not kavanaugh. and the idea that there should be investigations on kavanaugh, he is actually confirmed is also ridiculous. the entire constitution is set up so if a justice, and activist justice if they are partisan, if the act immoral, if the act contrary to the constitution, they are supposed to be removed. their term is not lifetime. there is nothing in the constitution that gives the justice lifetime appointment. their appointment is based on as the constitution says, good behavior. and to assume that a justice is going to act in bad behavior, is not a constitutional measure. it is a public opinion measure, which our justices were supposed to be shielded from in

the first place. mike: there is a question whether the judge kavanaugh treatment becomes a standard operating procedure for supreme court nominees going forward. take a listen to senator lindsey graham from friday and i will give you a chance to respond.>> if i am chairman next year, if we keep the majority as senator grassley moves over and i hope he does because i think he's done a great job. and we will remember this. there is the process before kavanaugh. in the process after kavanaugh. mike: your thoughts? >> you know, this is really what happens when we deviate from the constitutional standards. we get this kind of emotional and political chaos. our government is not supposed to be driven by vindictive tit-for-tat. our government is supposed to be driven by standard. we deviated from the standard a long time ago in confirmation

hearings. we don't need to devolve into emotional partisan, vindictive hearings. we need to elevate ourselves back to the standard of the constitution and start vetting justices on how they would handle constitutional matters. not how they would deal with political partisan issues. >> constitutional attorney, chris ann hall, thank you for your time. >> thank you. molly: helping nationwide, we have a fox affiliate, debbie tvt-- >> in army combat veteran received a heroes welcome. to a new home that his family can call their own. >> words do not express the gratitude i saw in my family feel.>> the staff sergeant was partially paralyzed from

the waist down in june 2013. while on a mission in afghanistan he was struck by enemy fire. which resulted in a spinal cord injury. >> it brings a little closure to, it can be somewhat described as a painful gesture. >> saturday he turned the page. >> you know, you see it from a foundation and at that point, the anticipation is killing me but today is a combination of all of that. you know, we can't be happier. chris for our troops made this accessible. >> all the appliances, the range, it is undercut, the sink is undercut. all the counters are lowered so i do not have to cut chicken wings at shoulder height. which if you've never done it, it is pretty hard on your shoulders. >> is also a place --

>> how are you doing brother? >> good, how the heck are you? >> for happy memories. >> that was jennifer reported. the u.s. ratcheting up tensions with china as u.s. navy worship sales. the reason behind this operation. plus, brand direction from iran after the president tough talk in the you and adjust lastly for what they are ran for an minister is calling the president. >> in the years since the deal was signed, iran's aggression only increased. the regime used funds from the deal to support terrorism. build nuclear capable missiles. and chaos. minimums and fees. they seem to be the very foundation of your typical bank. capital one is anything but typical. that's why we designed capital one cafes. you can get savings and checking accounts with

no fees or minimums. and one of america's best savings rates. to top it off, you can open one from anywhere in 5 minutes. this isn't a typical bank. this is banking reimagined. what's in your wallet?

a town where almost half the population is self-employed. this is stonington, maine, lobster fisherman is the lifeblood of this town. by 2030, half of america may take after stonington, self-employed and without employer benefits. we haven't had any sort of benefit plans and we're trying to figure that out now. if i had had a little advice back then, i'd be in a different boat today, for sure. plan your financial life with prudential. bring your challenges. >> iran foreign minister firing

back after president trump united nations address last week. when he took a hard-line against around and urged other world leaders in june in the u.s. in isolating the regime. >> this horrible, one-sided deal allowed iran to continue its path towards a bomb, the regime used new funds from the deal to support terrorism. build nuclear capable missiles, and ferment chaos. i asked all members of the security council to work with the united states to ensure the iranian regime change this behavior and never acquires a nuclear bomb. molly: today the iran foreign minister client president trump a bully and sending out a warning. watch. >> his policy is going to have a backlash. the international community is not going to accept somebody to come and just orders. we will continue to work the

deal certainly some european countries have withdrawn from iran because of the fear of punishment by the united states. >> i would like to welcome a fox news national security and foreign policy analyst, thank you for joining us today. >> thank you, molly. >> the announcement was made in may that the u.s. was withdrawing from the nuclear deal and the united states has now been set to impose sanctions in november. although it seemed like even for ahead of the sanctions that there is already some impact. the president is also called an action from other countries doubt join us and economic pressure. do think that the tone the president took on that national or global stage, is having an effect? >> it is having an effect, molly.it is actually made by the measurement that the obama administration did not want to confront the iranian regime after signing an agreement that got iran billions of dollars.

but now with the administration is to do is to establish an alliance, a coalition that would isolate iran, not being isolated as the ministers, they are trying to say. and number two important, the sanctions are creating an impact inside iran. we see those demonstrations for the past 8 to 9 months. don't we see them in minority areas and majority areas? it is working. it needs some more work for the future. molly: you brought up, iran has responded to the present. take a listen this is the iranian foreign minister. >> i think it is not a sign of strength, he is making all the statements. he can be making the security council to -- at the end of the day 14/15 members of the security council bashed his decision to walk away from jcpoa. molly: bashing the president also say in the united states that has managed to become isolated. does the s stand apart on this issue? >> i think united states now is

creating the largest coalition against number one, the missiles, the french, germans, many nations including russia. on the issue of missiles, there is international solidarity with the united states against the regime. but look, the minister mentioned the companies, european companies withdrawing. that is not solidarity with iran. more of these companies are going to be withdrawing but also the countries of the gulf, many arab countries. if you look at it strategically, many other countries from japan and soon to be you know brazil after the next election, there will be much more support to the american then this thing. molly: you raise a good point. some nations have pulled out working with iran. let's talk about u.s. dollars. the european union said last week they would work with members to create a system in which people and countries was to be able to trade with the oil companies in iran.

but the u.s. dollar is so powerful. it is kind of the center of international trade. it makes it very challenging for people to continue to do business with iran. does it not? >> look, there is a fact that the dollar is so powerful. like it or not that's what's happening worldwide. because it is the symbol of the american economy. the american economy is getting stronger and stronger. it is going to boil down to this. which company, which country in the world is going to make the choice of becoming the partner of the iranian economy with all of the problems in iran versus the american economy? that is a real measurement. and we will see the results. molly: upsala, thank you so much. aliza november as well. we will be looking ahead of that. >> thank you, molly. mike: another shark attack this time on the west coast. where it happened and the latest on the victim, next.

we want an update in the fbi probe and allegations against judge brett kavanaugh. an attorney for one of the accusers, deborah ramirez, his classmate from yale confirm she has been contacted by the fbi and agree to cooperate. molly: a 13-year-old boy recovering from a shark attack in southern california. the teenager was diving for lobsters on saturday.

>> we are actively having guards coming onto the beach and into the want to let people know we had a nonfatal shark attack and advising them to stay out of the water. molly: jeff paul joins us from our los angeles bureau. what is the latest on this young man's condition? >> molly, we are learning the boy that was attacked had surgery and right now is in critical condition. authorities of the victim was diving with others from his church youth group when at some point, a shark estimated to be around 11 feet long, attacked impaired first responder state of the victim is fighting for his life but alive. thanks to some good samaritans there were also diving for lobsters. those men rushed over to rescue the boy, all while the shark was still swimming dangerously close to them. >> so we are not in the water for over 30 minutes. and i hear screaming. i thought it was someone who had caught some big bugs and was enthusiastic. good for you! and then it kept going. and then i realized he was

yelling, i got bit, help! help! >> luckily got him out of the water because once he was on the kayak and started heading in, that is when i looked back and the shark was behind the kayak. he didn't want to give up yet. >> does know were able to get the boy out of the water and to the shore. a helicopter then transported the boy to the hospital. the coastline and one at the beach where the attack happened right now, it is shut down pure lifeguards and police are worried the shock that attacked could still be out there swimming around. also working to identify what kind of shark was of all. they say shark in the area is not that rare and there are many species of sharks that are not threatening. >> this is the first time in my career of 30 years that i have seen an attack or anything with a shark that has come in and made contact with one of our swimmers or divers or surfers here. this is a first.

in my career. >> lifeguards are hoping to have the beach open by tomorrow. molly: thank you so much for the update. we appreciate it. mike: we will be right back. ♪ ♪ his boy elroy. with instant acceleration, electric cars are more fun to drive and more affordable than ever. electric cars are here. plug into the present. the doctor's office just for a shot. but why go back there... when you can stay home with neulasta onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today.

neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. if you'd rather be home ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card. ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. not in this house. 'cause that's no so-so family. that's your family. which is why you didn't grab just any cheese. you picked up new kraft expertly paired

mozzarella and parmesan for pizzahyeah! kraft. family greatly. p2 that does it for us.

have a wonderful sunday. mike: a pleasure working with you. we will see what this kavanaugh course goes of the next week. a very intense week in the

nations capital. molly: the eyes will be on washington for sure. greg gutfeld is next. >> there's a lot to digest and we're chewing on all of it for you. let's get after it. noel francisco, great name. however no early christmas present for noel. should i stay or should i go? the clash between rosenstein and trump is in full effect. >> that noel joke was the worst thing ever written, but don't ever bring the clash into your sick ugly game, you freak. so pretty slow news