next revolution" will be televised. . >> dr. ford, >> doctor ford, with what degree of certainty do you believe brett kavanaugh assaulted you? >> 100%. >> and then of these allegations are true? >> correct. >> no doubt in your mind? >> 0. >> not even a scintilla. >> not a scintilla. 100% certain. >> is where the god? >> i swear to god. >> talking accusations, riveting defense and no evidence or corroboration but now the fbi is digging. the nomination of the us supreme court justice, emotions are running high.

>> look at me when i'm talking to you. you tell me my assault doesn't matter, the what happened to me doesn't matter and you are going to let people who do these things get into positions of power. that is what you're telling me when you vote for him. ed: you already know what happened last week. we are here to preview what you can expect to happen this week as brett kavanaugh's nomination reaches its final showdown. life, liberty and live in will air -- we can bring you a events rocking the white house, congress and the highest court in the land. breaking news tonight, we are about to unveil a new harvard harris poll, that has shocking results from the white house about where voters stand right now. we will give you the data first and give you reaction from the top white house official was also breaking the washington post has spoken to a brett cavanagh classmate planning to

sell the fbi about violent drunken behavior. this is the pile on or could its way vote in the senate? live reaction from the republican lawmaker. dianne feinstein at center stage yet again. first she sat on christine blasey-ford's letter for two month and today she fired off a letter to the white house making demands about the scope of the fbi investigation but feinstein is not alone. john brennan is weighing accusing brett kavanaugh of blatant partisanship. pretty rich from brennan who accused donald trump of treason. the new york times's new op-ed on how the fbi should run the risk of an investigation written by james comey. the trump and clinton fbi probes, our panel will debate whether they have a point or should sit this one out. and talk about irony, the president who battled the fbi leadership for a year, now the president but the fate of his nominee in the hands of that same fbi declaring free reign to dig around, what he thinks, if

the fbi clears brett kavanaugh, guaranty of swing votes like jeff flake. >> i think it would be proper to delay the floor vote for up to but not more than one week in order to let the fbi to do an investigation limited in time and scope. >> reporter: the president and his aides are pushing on limiting the new investigation of the allegations with brett cavanagh. allison barber joining us in washington. >> reporter: two reports this weekend raised a lot of questions about the scope of the fbi investigation, what directed might be coming from the white house, the white house counsel's office gave the fbi a list of witnesses that they interview. not on it according to nbc is

julie swetnick, the third woman to accuse brett kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, saying he was present at a party when she was gang raped in the early 80s. lost region report supports abc after putting saying the white house strike at the fbi to interview the first two brett kavanaugh accusers, not the third. senior white house officials and just reports of their involvement here are overblown. >> the white house hasn't intervene or micro managing the process. it is the senate process that has been from the beginning, we are letting the senate continue to dictate what the terms look like. >> the president respect the independence of the fbi, and they should be looking at anything they think is credibly limited scope. >> don't interview these witnesses? >> i don't think he would do that but i have not talked to him about it. >> reporter: attorneys talking to blasey-ford told the senate

and the world, brett cavanagh sexually assaulted her in high school, say they have not been contacted by the fbi, the president ordered the fbi to conduct a supplement of investigation friday to update brett kavanaugh's fire, brett kavanaugh denies the allegations against him. the white house claims they are not micromanaging the fbi investigation, the top democrat on the senate judiciary committee dianne feinstein sent a letter to the white house asking they provide the committee with a copy of the written directive sent by the white house to the fbi and in addition she writes the fbi request any expansion beyond the initial directive please provide the names of additional witnesses or evidence. the fbi spoke to debra ramirez who says he exposed himself to her at a party in college, brett kavanaugh denies that allegation. according to the associated press fbi agents interviewed ramirez, she detailed her allegations and gave the agents names of other individuals who she says can confirm her story.

ed: at the top of the so we promised to give you a look at a new harris poll conducted this week on where the public stands on the brett cavanagh nomination. the director of the paul posted his analysis@thehill.com and showed it to fox first, after the testimony the poll found today only 37% say confirm him. 44% say reject him, 23% undecided. the news got better for brett kavanaugh when respondents were told there was no evidence of sexual assault. 60% said if the fbi finds no corroboration the assault allegations, they would favor his confirmation. a majority of the public expects the fbi will come up with little that is new, meaning 63% say they believe brett cavanagh will be confirmed, 37% say they want their senators to vote in favor of confirmation. interesting because we have one of those senators now, bill

cassidy, republican louisiana. what is your reaction to the poll saying there was damage done to brett kavanaugh with his testimony thursday, he is underwater with the american people but if the fbi finds little or nothing new they think he should be confirmed. >> it is what i expect. when i tell people wait a second, every witness from doctor for denied that it happened including her best friends, that was lost. four people she says were there don't remember and said to the best of their knowledge it did not occur. once it clicks with them that that is the case -- >> will that resonate with susan collins and lisa murkowski? what conversations do you have with moderate senators on the republican and democrat side? >> they have been keeping their heads down. i understand completely. we are in a society where we cannot destroy another person just by saying something against them without any corroboration, they go with brett cavanagh.

ed: your analysis reported some confusion about that. should the white house turn over to dianne feinstein and the entire senate, what they directed the fbi. there were current credible allegations. should the fbi look at that? >> i can promise you there will be new allegations. what we clearly know is democrats have recognized the me too movement and we have seen harvey weinstein, it is weapon eyes to. obviously something happened to doctor ford but no one else corroborates and we have to say there's a possibility up to 37 years -- >> the fbi as a law enforcement agency would try to get to the bottom of corroboration or not. what about something all of us can see with our own eyes, brett cavanagh's testimony and new york times story saying when you

go through it there are inconsistencies about his drinking. should the fbi be looking at whether he committed perjury? >> i thought they are taking context and trying to make it inconsistent. they want to believe so intensely something happened, he must passed out etc.. ed: don't investigate that? >> i don't necessarily say that. ed: 69% say this has been a national disgrace, 31%, i could meet 31%, all sides have been frustrated. here's something important, 75% say senator feinstein should have shared what she knew earlier. >> there should be. democrats want to say we need to get to the bottom of it. some folks who may have coordinated a delay given to the letter to the fbi for two months.

in accordance with doctor ford's wishes, confidential, and remain anonymous. ed: will investigate? >> i don't think there will be. and incredibly disappointed, and respectful of confidentiality totally abused including leaking to washington. ed: when will we know if he was confirmed or not? friday when the fbi gives that. we are looking forward to that. brett cavanagh's testimony, and saturday night live decided to lampoon the proceedings. matt damon playing an exaggerated parody of the nominee. >> let me tell you this. i'm going to start at an 11 and take it to about a 15 real quick! ed: joining me for what we

expect to be a friendly debate, former deputy assistant to george w. bush scott bolden, former chairman of dc democratic party and national bar association, good evening. scott, i want to start with you. pretty funny when he comes out with brett kavanaugh, start at 11 rob: 15 but matt damon as i recall got into hot water not long ago for almost covering for harvey weinstein. is this someone who should be speaking out about brett cavanagh? >> it is comedy. it is comedy. i think it is kind of funny because matt damon did get caught up in harvey weinstein, the fact that he planted, not so serious it would be even funnier. he had the mark in regard to brett cavanagh. i think he was unhinged in his testimony, angry and upset, must be hard on his family, hard on doctor ford, but his answering

of the democratic senators questions was over-the-top and raises real question about his judicial temperament but the fbi gets involved this week as long as they don't have limitation, it will be a good thing and america needs to get past this while addressing issues that have been brought up. ed: scott went to something democrats are doing, trying to make the case he was so angry at you know brett kavanaugh, you can weave that in but the point is new york times, boston globe him of the story saying he was sewing we, so unhinged in their words that he won't be an impartial umpire. on the other hand his supporters are saying he has been unfairly and wrongly accused, what is wrong with him being mad as hell? >> you expect somebody who has been falsely accused, piling on the democrats, not to went to be

angry about it. i have to disagree. saturday night live should be ashamed of themselves, not funny to make fun of an egregious charge ford had to go through. no doubt something happened to her but not by brett kavanaugh. the liberal elite politicians want people to believe they are the champion for women's rights and sexual abuse yet the liberal establishment media lampoon it. it is not funny. it never was funny and it shouldn't be funny and there's a hypocrisy, double standard when it comes to liberals, it is okay, they don't win an election, resist it. >> the partisan attack on the democratic side gratuitously by brett kavanaugh and the q and a, when asked questions -- >> he deserves it! he is defending himself. you deserve it!

she deserves it. >> she deserves -- >> you deserve -- >> she didn't do anything to brett cavanagh. she was asking about his drinking. and she ever passed out from drinking and she blacked out. totally inappropriate and she was trying to get a question answered. >> you ask christening senator when interviewing for a job if she ever passed out when multiple reports say he is a drunk. are you kidding me? it is a fair question. he was offensive to her and unhinged. >> there was a report in the washington post tonight that one of his old classmates said drunken violent behavior. we don't know, some of this is 20 or 30 years ago. you are just throwing it out. >> his classmate who drank with him who did an interview on another tv station not only been

corroborated but several witnesses said he was an angry, belligerent drunk when he over drank and -- ed: i thought the fbi would do an independent investigation. that is what they are doing. why don't we let them go forward rather than a saying -- >> are they doing it with the drinking part? that is the bridge to the alleged sexual assault. he may deeply believe he didn't do it but may not remember doing it because of his heavy drinking. >> you made your point. what do you say about brett cavanagh? >> i worked with him. i know brett kavanaugh. one thing that ask me about democrats being a lawyer and you are a lawyer too, you have the right, the presumption of innocence which you took away from him. every -- >> he is interviewing for a job. >> shouldn't matter whether it is a court of law or not.

>> it started out friendly, got to leave it when we call everybody down, hopefully by the end of the week we will have an answer. thanks for coming in. donald trump addressing the fbi's brett cavanagh investigation saying the probe could be a blessing in disguise for the judge, reaction from the white house next. >> i expect this is going to turn out very well for the judge. there has never been anybody looked at like brett kavanaugh. i think it is going to work out very well. the fbi i believe is doing a really great job. they have free range. they will do whatever they have to do, whatever it is they do they will be doing, things we never even thought of and hopefully at the conclusion everything will be fine.

. ed: welcome back to our special coverage ever ed: welcome back to special coverage of the confirmation proceedings of brett kavanaugh. at the end of this our you will see life, liberty and levin, his fate lies in ahead of the senate where his conversation comes down to a single vote.

chad herbert, senior -- talk a little bit about the process. let's stay out of the weeds and get into politics. there are a couple tracks here. mitch mcconnell is trying to get this going but then there's a reality of the fbi investigation. >> reporter: the realities it might take up to a week to get this reporting which means they don't start to run the clocks in the senate until next friday or saturday. it takes four days to do this. mitch mcconnell would move to end debate on day one, day 2 would be the meeting day when they wait for the motion, day 3 you moved to vote to break the filibuster these 51 votes, and once you voted to break a filibuster, opponent of the nomination are given 30 hours. on day four day five you have a confirmation vote. mitch mcconnell can't do this until next wednesday at the earliest. that might drift into the weekend.

ed: they have a friday deadline. what do you expect in that 30 hours of debate or not? probably not start until next weekend, potentially with a final vote on brett kavanaugh assuming they don't find anything new early the following week or can it be done next weekend? >> reporter: it depends when they start the clock and democratic and republican senators think mitch mcconnell is jumping the gun they will say this up our agreement. mitch mcconnell needs those phones. he didn't have jeff wake until they broke his agreement, they are at 49 yeahs but you could go as high as 53 if they get susan collins on board, lisa murkowski, don't have the votes, the math is paramount. ed: democrats might come aboard, claire mccaskill in a tough senate battle in missouri before dramatic testimony on both sides, she said i'm going to vote no. now a polls suggest she is no in neck with josh all, people wondering whether the brett cavanagh nomination will have an

impact, joe donnelly late on friday doesn't interview with the local paper in indiana, he had already said i'm voting no on brett kavanaugh but let's see what happens with the fbi, maybe opening the door to yes. >> and heidi heitkamp of north dakota, keep in mind, look at the 3 democratic senators in swing states voted for neil gorsuch, manchin, donnelly and heitkamp. i would start with those. chris: a lot of people asking about this video sheila jackson lee from texas at this hearing, doctor ford testified she gives an envelope to one of the lawyers, a lot of conspiracy theories on the internet, we want to separate fact from fiction, you did some digging. >> i have seen those envelopes, they were envelopes written in longhand, we support you, we believe you, not seeing what they said inside but sheila jackson lee and other house

democratic women came over to watch the hearing, sheila jackson lee gave those to one of the councils for ford but they were letters of support written by hand and given to congresswoman jackson lee. >> thank you as always. let's get fresh reaction from the white house, the white house spokesperson for the cavanagh confirmation, thanks for being on sunday night. democrat dianne feinstein facing controversy but tonight demanding the white house of her in the rest of the senate some idea what direction you gave the fbi on the scope. >> my understanding is there are no plans and let's talk about what we are talking about. i want to talk about what this is. this is a background check. a background check for a job. these investigations are

clearances, confidential, they are supposed to be private so to suggest we are going to put out something that is supposed to be very confidential, the way senator feinstein has handled this entire process you just alluded to has undermined severely the confidentiality that is in struggle. chris: we were talking, washington post posted the story, we can't verify it but on the record a yale classmate not making sexual allegations that saying he saw violent, belligerent drunk in brett kavanaugh. this is unverified, uncorroborated. it has to be frustrating for you and brett kavanaugh. didn't the agreement friday open the door to a bunch of new allegations? >> we were clear over the weekend the white house is not going to micromanage this investigation and it is not a fishing expedition.

the investigation is limited to as dictated by the senate, senator flake, collins, murkowski, these senators asked for this investigation in the white house is accommodating them. it is limited to current credible allegations. ed: how do you define that? >> it is not about relitigating brett kavanaugh's behavior in high school and college the current credible allegations as dictated by the senate, they set the parameters. ed: i got an email from of you are saying why we going through brett kavanaugh's alleged drinking escapades but nothing about doctor ford? does the white house believe her yearbook in high school, her social media was scrubbed, all these things on the internet, what does the white house believe about what is fair game with doctor ford? >> we will leave the investigation to the expert and trust the fbi to do their job.

>> brett cavanagh is attacked every day with these allegations and doctor ford, no one wants to attack the victim the questions are not being raised about what happened to her. >> we are leaving this to the fbi to do their job, accommodating the senate and talk about what we do now. the allegations as alleged by doctor ford completely uncorroborated. the people she describes have no recollection of such a party and her lifelong best friend since she doesn't know brett kavanaugh. ed: doesn't know how she got home. when does this end? do you expect to vote next weekend or the following week? what is the white house gameplaying? >> we are accommodating the senate, accommodating what senators flake, collins and rakowski asked for in the parameters they set, this would be done within a week. ed: friday it should be done and you hope there is a final four vote after that.

>> certainly hope so was one of the most qualified individuals that has ever been before the american people. ed: your confident he will be confirmed? >> yes. ed: appreciate you coming in. the media attacking brett cavanagh, brought his family into it, collins suggesting he should not be allowed to coach young girls. we will talk to a son of the late antonin scalia about the personal side of this. life, liberty and live in, what is in store for all of us. >> tonight on life, liberty and live in, will there be a left-wing democrat blue wave in the next election? not if republicans run as conservatives. the governor of kentucky did exactly that. that.

. ed: the media attacks on supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh are bringing his family into the fray. ed: media attacks on brett cavanagh bring his family to the front, brett kavanaugh said he was worried he could not coaches daughter's basketball team anymore in usa responded maybe he should be staying away from coaching kids. joining me about the impact of all of this on the judge's families crystal scalia, one of the sons of antonin scalia. usa today published a column over the weekend that raised the question that he shouldn't be

coaching young girls. they clarified it, their family has been through this not quite like this. what goes through your mind when you see that? >> nothing close to this. my dad was confirmed 98-0 but that was stressful. can't imagine what his family is going through. that particular story was tasteless i thought because last week he was a gang rapist and now the insinuation is he is a pedophile. it is ridiculous. it is just gross. it is also assuming all the allegations are true. somewhere in the article it said when you're credibly accused of sexual assault, that is debatable. has he been credibly accused? earlier guests talked about how this has been corroborated.

ed: doctor ford gave credible testimony but people think he gave credible testimony as well and he said she said right now and another thing the mainstream media is leaving out, they talked about of the first day but the usa today story, less about this moment at the hearing. >> the other night ashley and my daughter said their prayers and liza, 10 years old. said to ashley we should pray for the woman. a lot of wisdom from a 10-year-old. we mean no bill will. >> all we hear is he was angry. there were angry moments but you don't hear about that. >> i heard some of that. people on the left are critical of it, like his anger, crying and that situation, sign up for

judicial temperament. i found that an astounding claim especially from people who in part don't like brett cavanagh because he's not empathetic enough. here's a moment they could be empathetic with him and sympathize with the pain he is going to come his family is going through. ed: a few times at dinner giving remarks, a woman standing up and the only person who started screaming at him, and the decision he had written, and opinion. and moving towards her, they got that angrier and he didn't flinch. hang on, let her alone and let me argue it out, and i get on the point and watch what is going on, people not talking about policy or abortion or same-sex marriage, it is about character assassination. >> they lost the argument on his

qualifications and his opinions during the first week so they are left with character assassination. ed: what do you make of this? >> i think he saw this coming in the early 90s. in one of his dissents and speeches he said we shouldn't be surprised people are treating these like elections because judges are more like elected officials now than judges because they are making policy decisions that don't belong in the hands of judges. ed: one of the most conservative justices ever and was confirmed in 98-0 at a different time. we appreciate it. tensions escalate over the handling of doctor ford's allegation, republicans and democrats trade shots over fbi background checks, getting insight from former assistant director to tell us how this fbi probe works. not the allegations but the facts.

today is the day you're going to get motivated...

get stronger... get closer. start listening today to the world's largest selection of audiobooks on audible. and now, get more. for just $14.95 a month, you'll get a credit a month good for any audiobook, plus two audible originals exclusive titles you can't find anywhere else. if you don't like a book, you can exchange it any time, no questions asked. automatically roll your credits over to the next month if you don't use them.

with the free audible app, you can listen anytime, and anywhere. plus for the first time ever, you'll get access to exclusive fitness programs a $95 value free with membership. start a 30-day trial today and your first audiobook is free. cancel anytime and your books are yours to keep forever. audible. the most inspiring minds. the most compelling stories. text "listen16" to 500500 to start your free trial today.

. >> next per resin refers to an fbi report as being worth anything didn't understand anything. fbi, explicitly does not in this or any other case reach a conclusion, period, period. the reason why we cannot rely on the fbi report, you wouldn't like it if we did because it is inconclusive. ed: is former vice president joe biden, chairman of the senate judiciary, criticizing the reliability of fbi probes and sexual misconduct cases in the 1991 confirmation for clarence thomas who at the time was accused by anita hill.

a former fbi assistant director joins us now. let's start with what joe biden said. his words are being twisted. we played a long clip. he is making it clear at the end of the day the fbi will get he said she said. was he right then? was it possible the fbi is going to get a corroboration for sexual assault allegations. >> the fbi does not render opinions or conclusions, something reports facts and to get straight what is going on. these are called special inquiries. they are not investigations in the traditional sense of the word. they are called special inquiries or spins to draw the distinction. they are interviews and background checks, wiretaps, grand jury, no subpoena, no compelled testimony, not full on

investigations. ed: when the senate said this is about current credible allegations, publishing a story on uncorroborated, not current last friday. and he specifically says there is drunken violent behavior in college by brett kavanaugh allegedly but he wants to talk to the fbi about it. will that be part of this? >> it will be part of this and that is why this supplemental spin is necessary so we don't have these spurious reports from all directions, we get it from fbi interviews, documented interview summaries, not some washington post reporter or new york times reporter or any reporter at all. these are straight on factual interviews looking for corroboration or anything that contradicts what they are saying.

ed: there is irony here all around, if donald trump is criticizing not the rank and file fbi agents but the leadership, he is counting on fbi to give him a seal of approval for his nominee. there is irony there but also in the new york times op-ed from james comey saying here is how you should do it, the guy who was criticized by democrats for how he handled the clinton email investigation and the republicans for how he handled the trump fbi idea. why is he weighing in? >> no idea. he has been thoroughly discredited. or leon, i travel in circles where i talk to current agents and former agents, there's a huge community of retired agents and we hear from the ones that are still on board and he completely lost their support. the general consensus from this entire communities he is off the rails.

that gives us a glimpse of his internal biases when he was fbi director. ed: one of my friends, i went to give you the pedestrian view, people watching us are hearing the allegations, there have been 6 background checks, how in the world if these allegations are true, gang rape, all these heinous things, how could it not have been found six times, would that be a massive failure by the fbi to not uncover it or are these in terms of the investigation they didn't find them? >> they can't find things that were never recorded by anybody any time in the last 36 years. they interview friends and associates and colleagues. any logical person going all the way back to college days, not necessarily high school days, don't know if they carry them in the yearbook but none of it did come up. ed: a needle in a haystack, can't find anything.

>> especially things that have ever been reported to anybody. ed: and don't know whether they are true or not. protesters are targeting senators who are on the fence. we will talk about threats and intimidation at susan collins of maine and after this show at the top of the hour, life, liberty and levin. . >> tonight on "life, liberty & >> will there be a left-wing democrat blue wave in the next election? not of republicans run as conservatives. my guest, governor of kentucky who did exactly that. my name is jeff sheldon,

and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t.

shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

. >> a fox news alert, spending a lot of time ed: fox news alert, we spent a lot of time on brett kavanaugh. canada and the united states reached a deal that will preserve the nafta trade pact. a lot of people said this wouldn't happen, it will allow greater access to the dairy farms and address canadian concerns about tariffs. negotiations racing to me to us imposed deadline of september 30th. we have a lot more on that tomorrow and a lot on the brett

cavanagh nomination battle, opponents of the nomination targeting not only the judge and his family but the senate is lining up to be key votes in the confirmation. one of the mrs. collins, facing intimidation and physical threats. joining me as chief counsel, policy director at the crisis center. i want to talk about that with susan collins, a local paper and mean saying brett kavanaugh should be voted down, she is getting pressure there but interesting from the obama administration, the former cia director john brennan decided to weigh in on judicial nomination saying doctor ford is a national treasure, jeff flake is an admirable man with a conscience. craven politician lindsey graham is not. brett kavanaugh's to permit and blatant partisanship are disqualifying. someone accusing the president without evidence of treason in john brennan saying there's blatant partisanship by brett

kavanaugh. will this resonate, the idea that he was so angry at the hearing, he doesn't have, he was partisan they say it doesn't have temperament to be a justice? >> constantly changing their story. they said allegations were falling apart, the fbi investigation, they are getting it and trying to find something else to complain about. i thought he behaved the way you would expect someone wrongly accused of something and sees their entire life's work, entire reputation being dragged through the mud this way. it was a totally understandable response. ed: brett cavanagh will be dragged through them but in the next week. on the one hand the president said this could be a blessing in disguise because if the fbi finds no corroboration, then he might be confirmed. on the other hand, who knows what will come out in the next week. >> they have a minute in time and scope.

it is not a government-funded fishing expedition. collins, risk our ski and flake want to make sure the fbi looks thoroughly. we interviewed most people involved, there's not a lot new i would expect them to find. ed: some say he will not be interviewed by the fbi because he artie talked to them. >> the same penalty, same federal statute says you can't lie to the fbi or senators. we will end this in the same place we started except some of those senators have an extra vote of confidence. ed: we talk about susan collins, jeff flake, republican, lisa murkowski, your organization has done some polling, joe mannchin, joe donnelly told the local newspaper let's see if the fbi doesn't find corroboration. maybe he suggested i will be a yes. what are you seeing? >> it is a possible he and heidi

heitkamp voted for neil gorsuch. our polling was a 3 point spread of some people wanting brett cavanagh confirmed and that is stronger among independents and west virginia was interesting. we saw 58% to 28%. ed: was there before? >> higher after the hearing because people didn't see in brett kavanaugh someone who was very credible. a lot of people coming to this conclusion, maybe they are both sincere but seems she is mistaken. ed: critic side as anger, others as innocent until proven guilty. >> and west virginia 20 point difference with women saying brett kavanaugh should be confirmed. ed: as we have a bruising confirmation battle, in new york city thousands came together to run from lower manhattan, we trace the steps of the firemen who raced through the tunnels of

the towers to help so many before he perished himself, brothers frank and george and family and friends raised billions for the tunnels the towers foundation, focusing on paying off mortgages for building new homes for goldstar families, military families and thousands of first responders who died in the line of duty. a small role in their prerace reception and when i showed up, the nypd chief of the department raced to get me a police pin. since we are fair and balanced i accepted fdny cufflinks from the fire commissioner, i wore one on each caller in honor of amazing men and women around the great country who come together to protect us every day not just in new york city but all around america, even in these divided times. we want to salute them tonight. you can find their foundation online, tunnels to towers, check that out. we want to thank you for

watching, standby for a wonderful episode of life, liberty and levin after this break.

>> good morning to you. is monday, october 1, this is happening at 4:00 a.m. on the east coast. democrats now demanding to know what the white house told the fbi as the feds begin their seventh investigation into brett cavanaugh -- kavanaugh the left is not going to like this one. >> an incredible new video of navy sailors risking their lives to save dozens from a quickly sinking plane. see t l