photography world and pooh-poohing this thing called digital photography. humbled by progress. it's humanizing. it's repetitive. will fall the impact on the leaders now. "the five" is next. ♪ >> greg: i am greg gutfeld with katie pavlich, juan williams, pete hegseth, dana perino. "the five" ." senator elizabeth warren just released a campaign ad disguised as a dna test or maybe it was a dna test disguised as a campaign ad. she ladles her dna results with some relatives in music and includes me. i am touched. that happens every time i take the subway. >> i hear some of you are

republicans. what do you think of him calling her pocahontas? >> i think it's ridiculous. >> i think it's silly. >> greg: what does warren translate into cherokee as? >> segments of native american and ancestry. >> the president likes to call my mom a liar. what do the facts say? >> the facts suggest you absolutely have native american ancestry in your pedigree. >> greg: her native american ancestry may date back six to ten generations. potentially 11,000 -- using such standards, i am asian which is why i can't get into harvard. no wonder she had to rely on sentiment and victimhood. this isn't about history but her story and fixing it because it's a mess.

did she or did not list yourself as a minority in law school directories when it suited her and then removed it when he didn't? it's not about her background. it's about cheating. she is a white woman of vast european ancestry who went to the buffet of identity politics and took seconds and thirds. warren is native american because she said so. she wins the 2018 rachel dalziel award. so if we all do the same test is hers and find similar percentages, aren't we also eligible to claim the experiences of an oppressed group and their past grievances? her results become the standard for anyone choosing a path that offers an edge, who can skip ahead in admissions were jobs in places where diversity trumps experience and so dna test become the new affirmative action. at whose expense? maybe no one because if we are all a little oppressed, we are all good. goodbye, identity politics. if everyone is a minority, then nobody is. there's a silver lining.

i think she did the nation a service. we are all native american. interesting fact from michael aaron, what's his name? the g.o.p. spokesman. "new york times" sourcing. the average european-american's .18. the average european-american is actually more native american than she is. did this backfire? >> dana: a little bit. a lot of the media were treating this as her response to trumpet she's going to have to get through democratic primary and i imagine if it got down to the top ten that her opponents were going to use this -- donald trump wasn't going to have to do anything. i think she's overreacting a little bit. do your point, she's never had to answer this question. why did she not listed when she was applying to lower tier schools? only listed it when she applied to the higher tier schools and then did not list it after she had tenure. that's the part -- even if you

are native american, why did you listed when you only thought it was going to help you get an edge? >> greg: good points. juan, is this about trump or the people she's going to have to face before trump? >> juan: it was about the effectiveness of the trump attack, calling her pocahontas and ridiculing her in that way so i think she wanted to respond. now i think it's like jiu-jitsu. she thinks she's put the pressure on trump. the key thing here for me is that when the papers ask the folks at harvard, did you infect consider this when you hired her, they said no. university of pennsylvania, i think they said at the university of pennsylvania they filled out a form explaining why they hired a white woman over minority people. the whole basis, the foundation of the trump attack was "you use this to get ahead falsely." it turns out that's not true, in addition to which she has some native american ancestry. >> greg: >> katie: i would disa. in 1997, fordham university, the

lower view describes warren as harvard law school first woman of color. they had that cemented in their legacy. the funny thing about this today looking at this, the way the media reacted calmly for really looking at the studying going through the numbers, it was warren verifies that she's native american. "the boston globe" goes through a series of corrections because first they were saying it was 1:30 second. then they go all the way to correcting it due to a math error and it turns out to be one in 1,024. going down the line of the impossibilities of the point you brought up in the sense that she's less native american than the majority of americans. >> juan: do you think she is owed a million bucks by trump? >> greg: i would say i think it would be good for donald trump to donate that money, write it off. and then thank her for -- he points out everyone in america

is native american. she has done a service. thank you for doing the work for me. >> pete: i can see the campaign t-shirts. "i am black." "i am hispanic." "i am jewish." whatever. whatever you want to be. to your point. it's exploiting minority status. she did it time and time again with the president did was devastatingly lay out how she used it for own advantage continues to use it for own advantage. and now she thinks she's getting ahead of it. no, she's creating more of a problem for herself. she can't get past it. this will make it worse. >> dana: terrible political timing. 22 days until the midterm election. democrats losing ground with many republicans but they have an edge, especially in the house, not the senate. they have all this money. they could've used all day today, all this week they could've been talking about it.

she had to release it today? why not do it the day after election? most of the democrats -- obama's communications person was pulling his hair out saying why would you do this today? doesn't help any of the democrats. this story about the dna test came the day after a "washington post" story about how great she's been, all of these democratic candidates. once they win their primaries, she's there with a phone call of support and money. she's doing a lot to try to build up a lot of support within the party and then she does this. >> katie: she's having serious problems on the left. if she thinks this is going to help her by claiming the unsubstantiated evidence that she has minority status, on the left, it's a problem with the introduction---

intersectionality. there's this evidence in lower views that you are chosen on the fact that your name was listed as a minority professor before you got to harvard law. she has problems on both sides of the aisle. in the primary for 2020 and in a general election. >> juan: from the democrats' perspective, i don't think you are right. >> dana: i was quoting jim messina. >> juan: he was saying timing might be an issue but not all of this of piling on. i think it's interesting, to my mind, what comes out is here's another trump fallacy. pocahontas, he likes to ridicule people. >> pete: 1% constitutes an ethnic background? >> juan: her family history was that her great-grandmother great-grandmother -- >> greg: and she lied about it anyway. >> juan: told her -- >> pete: i don't think you can

tell a folktale about my mother and then pretend it's true. >> juan: i'm saying that was her family story. she didn't know. >> katie: she knows now. >> greg: my 23 and me has me at 2% native american which is actually more than her, so i am welcoming her to my family. to the point, it's a bigger point, is this the next step in affirmative action? dna testing? every single person, when you are applying for college, you get -- >> dana: you don't just get to check the box. you have to send in your results. i am 1% albanian, remember that? >> katie: i was too scared. i was about to do that test that was sitting there for a year and i got freaked out reading the terms of service and put it bac back. >> juan: we always talk about identity politics of the table, but if you are applying, you really want to be white upper-class. >> greg: maybe not have gotten into harvard. >> juan: harvard said that's not true.

i am saying university of pennsylvania, harvard or same same thing. fordham university said we think this woman -- but it didn't impact your ability. >> greg: we are probably going to see how harvard really thinks in this asian discrimination case. we are going to see how they treat people for real because we are going to be covering that i think wall-to-wall. >> dana: it's going to be amazing. >> greg: some in the media are blaming president trump for the disappearance of a foreign journalist. that's ahead. don't forget to check out our social media for more behind-the-scenes action on "the five" ." alright, i brought in ensure max protein... ...to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. [grunting noise] i'll take that. 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. ensure max protein. in two great flavors.

the best simple salad ever?d great tasting, heart-healthy california walnuts. so simple, so good. get the recipes at walnuts.org. ♪ [ telephone ringing ] -whoa. [ indistinct talking ] -deductible? -definitely speaking insurance. -additional interest on umbrella policy? -can you translate? -damage minimization of civil commotion. -when insurance needs translating, get answers in plain english at progressiveanswers.com. ♪ -he wants you to sign karen's birthday card. it's a high honor.

♪ >> dana: president trump has ordered secretary of state like pompeo to saudi arabia to meet with king salman about the disappearance of a "washington post" journalist. inspections of the saudi consulate in turkey. the president vows to get to the bottom of what happened. >> president trump: we are going to leave nothing uncovered. that being said, the king firmly denies any knowledge of it. he didn't really know.

may be, i don't want to get into his mind, but it sounded to me like maybe these could have been rolled killers. who knows? >> dana: cnn's brian seltzer suggest the president may be to blame for the situation. >> told lower someone to a consulate to dismember the body and take it back to saudi. it's a crying of the different caliber. i wonder if you look at what's happened in the last 12 days and you wonder if "any me of the people" rhetoric, not just from president trump but from other world leaders anything to do with it, anything at all. >> dana: katy, let me go to you. president trump taking it very seriously and that he's sending secretary pompeo. you are on the plane, . >> katie: the stakes are extremely high. the middle east has changed in terms of the alignment of where things are going. saudi arabia is depending on us in terms of the iran deal.

there are lots of things at stake and i have a feeling section a pompeo was going to ask a lot of serious, pointed questions and if the saudis did this. there is reporting coming out from another network of "the wall street journal" saying that the saudis are preparing a report saying that he came into the building to the consulate. they wanted to interrogate him and accident landed up killing him and he never made it out of the consulate. we have to verify that here at fox but the point is this could have been ratcheted up to an even higher level than what we've seen. the stakes are high economically and in terms of national security and that's why pompeo was sent on the plane this morning as soon as president trump talk to king salman from saudi arabia who denied it. we will see what happens. i have a feeling were not coming all the details of exactly what went down. >> dana: the turks and saudis are supposedly working together on this investigation and the thing is, even with the turks, sometimes, well, you don't get to figure allies necessarily. sometimes you have to have --

>> pete: at all. >> dana: that's my point. they are a part of nato. >> pete: part of the reason why nato has become less and less relevant. it's not the whole alliance but when you let in a country that's increasingly becoming a dictatorship and an islamist country can meet all have a real alliance. >> dana: my point is sometimes your allies do things to you that will disappoint you. >> pete: i don't think we knew w the two were three layers underneath this. i don't think it's fair to call it a journalist pulled in and killed. we don't know what he may or may not of been doing on behalf of governments. he shouldn't of been killed either way. it takes a lot to accidentally kill a guy. barely that's a bad story to try to cover up clearly summary that was intended for this guy. >> dana: if this is the one they eventually come out with that they had lied to the world onto the president for about ten days beforehand.

>> greg: i am more interested in the brian stelter angle. i remember president obama mocking romney, saying russia was a threat and then the whisper on the hot mic. this was happening while russian journalists while being murdered in scores, dozens. i don't remember stelter blaming obama for that. and it bothers me because the saudis have done a lot of bad things and we have talked about it on "the five," their treatment of gays, the treatment of women. the way they treat jews, christians, myriad human rights abuses. these have been conveniently ignored but then they get outraged because it's one journalist. but what stelter did was he revealed why. he could leak it to trump. if he could not link it to trump, would he have actually brought it up? i don't think so.

i'm more interested in someone else, the blogger who had a religious freedom website and he was imprisoned for that by the saudis. he's been sentenced to ten years and 1,000 lashes. in saudi arabia, they still do the lash. journalists are upset about this one guy but they've been doing this for a long time. that man is still in prison. he doesn't get enough attention. he was just a blogger. it'll be great if trump sent pompeo and brought him back. >> juan: to my mind, this is about money. you see already big american corporations pulling out of the conference that was to be held in saudi arabia. and then you see the response coming from the stock market over there. the stock market over there went way down. i think there's lots of concerned that the saudis, now say that if there are threats

against them, they were will retaliate even more severely. talk not economic retaliation against not only the u.s. but the germans, the french, who have said this is unacceptable. >> dana: it's not like the saudi economy has a lot of flexibility there. >> juan: they have money and they can redirect their resources. i don't know how much they can do. clearly there is a deal on the table that i think concerns president trump greatly to sell them some airplanes -- armament armaments. >> katie: it's bigger than just the economy. >> juan: that's on the table even as we are talking about american values. >> dana: they are threading the needle. trump touting a red wave and the midterms, as some democrats are now fearing a 2016 repeat. lobster fisherman is the lifeblood of this town.

by 2030, half of america may take after stonington, self-employed and without employer benefits. we haven't had any sort of benefit plans and we're trying to figure that out now. if i had had a little advice back then, i'd be in a different boat today, for sure. plan your financial life with prudential. bring your challenges. of every great meal is always the potato?t bite that's why it should always be an idaho potato.

only genuine idaho potatoes have the perfect taste and texture to get your meal started right. billions of problems. dry mouth? parched mouth? cotton mouth? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath oral rinse and lozenges. help relieve dry mouth using natural enzymes to soothe and moisturize. so you can... breathe easy, there's therabreath at walmart.

♪

>> juan: three weeks from tomorrow voters head to the polls and one of our nation's fiercest midterm battles ever. president trump touting republican enthusiasm during his campaign blitz in battleground states. the president also ramping up his attack against democrats. >> >> president trump: if nancy pelosi... [boos] >> president trump: crying chuck schumer and the radical democrats take over congress, they will try to raise your taxes. they will immediately restore job killing regulations. they will destroy your second amendment and the democrats want to open our borders to a flood of deadly drugs and ruthless gangs. >> juan: speaking of democrats, their new concerns is

the parties overconfidence heading in to the election. some democrats reportedly worried they could see a repeat of 2016. you know why that is. because nobody predicted the donald trump was going to beat hillary. >> katie: a few people who did did. a few people who did predict he would beat her. >> juan: did you? >> katie: i did not. the majority. >> greg: terry sheppard. >> juan: the guy at university -- >> dana: what was your question? >> katie: the majority of polling outlets had hillary clinton winning with a percentage of 87% in terms of the chance she had. those same polling firms, they are saying the same thing today about democrats beating republicans. that may be accurate. >> dana: there is no electoral college in the midterm election, so the electoral college was

what? how president trump got the victory because he knew what the game was and his team plotted out that version. there is no electoral college that can help the republicans. they've got to do it on their own. >> katie: the polling could be more accurate because it's per district, not for state like the electoral college. that being said, there are lots of questions about what people are saying and who they're going to vote for. independents are very split. president trump's numbers are up into his visible. it is clear based on his schedule, from the white house announced he would be on the road three or four times a week doing rallies, it was like it's a lot but it's paying off and people are paying attention. the polling numbers are not only going up personally but he's going up in districts he's targeting. >> juan: he is talking a lot about brett kavanaugh, a little bit about the economy. not so much the tax cuts. what do you think of his rhetoric? >> pete: in terms of the 2018 debate, you saw the

gubernatorial candidate in georgia talking about how undocumented immigrants are going to be part of the blue wave. he looks at dances we still believe in borders and citizenship and we are going to throw down on that and support our police and stand for the anthem. the economic results are in and they are good for this president. this election is not about the economy in my opinion. it. it's still a cultural battle being fought. people feel like they are losing their country. they saw what happened to kavanaugh they are galvanized by. 2018 feels a lot like 2016 because the elites are telling us that the polls are for the democrats but the pulse on the ground is the belief that this president can deliver. it will be interesting to see watching candidates who support trump versus candidates who have embraced him. i am of the belief that embracing the president means you ingratiate yourself to your base which is what we need. trying to play the tap dance game never works. >> juan: dana, picking up on what katie was talking about. "washington post" abc poll, the president's numbers went up from

41% -- from 36% to 41%. but he is still underwater. 56%. >> dana: remember. he won the presidency with the same approval rating. he and hillary clinton had about the same approval rating going into 2016. polls show republicans are doing better in almost every way. only in the last four or five weeks. republicans were a little bit late to come home then to focus on the election. in those states where the senate democrats are running for your reelection where trump won, north dakota, missouri, tennessee, the republican is starting to pull away. i think those things look a lot better. one poll today sugar grove wiccans are neck and back with democrats for house seats as well. who knows what will happen. that's why we'll be here to bring it to you.

>> juan: culture wars? >> greg: i think so. i think it's about personality. the policies are working. so what if he's made america great. he is still a big jerk. i don't know if that's going to work. the hard part about republicans, trump presidency measured in dog years. for every one thing that happened in the obama white house every day, there are seven things that happen every day and a trump white house. obama might have eaten a dog but trump is a dog. he's always out doing something. that's my people are going to tend to forget about the kavanaugh stuff navy in two weeks. >> dana: i don't think so. david french had a piece this weekend. the kavanaugh hearings and confirmation was more divisive than the 2016 election. because it shone a bright light on where the divisions are and i think it brought -- reminded

them why they are republicans in the first place and i think they are starting to see that especially in those senate races. >> juan: enthusiasm on the republican side is definitely up. i saw a poll today that had democrats in the generic up 11. >> dana: it could happen. and also the democrats have registered a lot more new voter voters. >> juan: hillary clinton facing backlash from both sides of the aisle for dismissing her husband's affair with monica lewinsky. how can this be? details straight ahead on "the five" ." insurance! man 1: (behind wall) yep, geico helped me with renters insurance, too! um... the walls seem a bit thin... man 2: (behind wall) they are! and craig practices the accordion every night! says the guy who sings karaoke by himself. i'm a very shy singer. you're tone deaf! ehh... should we move on to the next one? it's a great building! you'll love it here! we have mixers every thursday. geico®. it's easy to switch and save

on homeowners and renters insurance.

jushis local miracle ear t at helped andrew hear more geico®. it's easy to switch and save of the joy in her voice. just one hearing test is all it took for him to hear more of her laugh... and less of the background noise around him. for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter. just one free hearing test could help you hear more... laughter...music...life... call now for your free hearing test from an industry leader:

miracle-ear. ♪ >> katie: hillary clinton's shameless hypocrisy is hitting new heights, as -- the self-proclaimed feminist making controversial comments that fly in the face of the me too movement, defending her husband's affair with former

white house intern monica lewinsky. >> do you think bill should have resigned? >> absolutely not. >> it wasn't an abuse of power? >> no. >> people look at it and say a president of the united states cannot have a consensual relationship with an intern. the power imbalance -- >> who was an adult. >> katie: dana, your response. >> dana: i'm going to date myself a little bit but in 1997 when this was going down, i was a staffer on capitol hill and i remember thinking wait a minute. she was the intern. this was wrong. i knew it was wrong. the feminist organizations not defending monica lewinsky. they tried to discredit not just lewinsky. they called her a looney tunes. not to mention juanita broaddrick and the other accusers. i feel like she undercut the abuse of power position that's been used in sexual harassment cases in the workplace that was the entire basis of the me too

movement. i think she's been on record saying how important that record has been but she undercut the entire thing. her road-show of bill clinton is going to be fascinating. we will probably be able to get a block out of it for the next 365 days. >> greg: i read the bill clinton was also about to do 23 and me until he found out it wasn't a dating site. this whole thing with monica lewinsky -- if you google mimi alford, a similar story with jfk and an intern. am i right? >> dana: that sounds right. >> katie: i'm not going to fact-check it. >> greg: to your point, no feminist would agree with what she said because in the mind of the feminist, it's all about the power structure, not about age. here you have a very powerful man in a powerless woman but you are talking to the wife. the wife has a different way of looking at things. she's thinking it's entirely

possible that the 22-year-old knew what she was doing. that's how a wife would look at defending her husband. i see her point of view. i can't believe i'm defending hillary she's basically saying that woman, "that woman," to quote clinton. that she had a choice. humans are hypocrites when it comes of this stuff. when it happens to you, you change the rules. >> katie: the power structure of course is a problem. the definition of sexual harassment is using a position of power to get what you want out of someone who has less power than you do. the president of the united states, and an intern, it's a perfect example of that situation. as we have seen on the left, the power structure only really matters depending on the political outcome. the reason why feminists defended clinton in the 90s was because he believed in abortion so they defended him. now that we have different

scenarios and different situations, they tend to have a different view of things. i live -- >> pete: those cultural flash points, where do you stand ideologically on the things i say i believe in then l decide whether i believe you or don't believe you. hillary clinton says i believe all women except those women who said that they were raped by my husband. i'm going to shame them publicly, which she did multiple times. she made a bargain along time ago. i stay with my husband. i get to run for president, loose twice, go on tour with him and continued to pretend like i'm happy to be there. it's all speculation. i hope they have a great marriage. i don't disparage them that that that bargain was made in every day she has to walk that line. it looks like late into hypocrisy. >> katie: what about hillary's role? every time hillary opens her

mouth it's a gift of the republican party, especially before a midterm election. she's not being helpful on on e me too issue. what's the end game? do you think it benefits the democrats? >> juan: i don't think it benefits democrats and i think people, you were talking about timing earlier with the comments about elizabeth warren. i think david axelrod was on this when he said this was not what democrats want to be talking about. my point here would be i think she was asked if her husband should resign. she said definitely not, and this is according to monica lewinsky, it was a consensual affair. no one ever said it was sexual harassment. this was -- >> katie: but monica lewinsky came out in a piece for "vanity fair" and set of the time, yes it was consensual but looking back on it now the power structure of it doesn't exactly make it consensual. he really doesn't. >> juan: i agree with that. you have to look back.

she said at the time it was consensual. that's why didn't fall into that larger category. but i am of a mind that if you go back to kennedy -- throughout history, people have different responses the different times. we are at a me too moment right now. remember kavanagh, in the midst of his hearings, he was blaming the clintons. that was nonsense. >> greg: the point you are making is i think really important. it was a consensual relationship and when things are consensual, the luxury of then changing your mind looking back. it's not fair. to your point, if two people are in a relationship and then years later they go, looking back on it -- >> katie: i think that's a fair point to make however the bigger argument of feminists at the time and still today, fighting sexual harassment on the definition of someone with power using that power against

someone who doesn't have any. when you have the president of the united states against an intern. setting the bar. >> juan: i don't know about "against." >> katie: leveraging his power against a young woman. >> juan: i think women can also be entranced by a powerful man. >> katie: the bigger problem is the feminist argument of what the definition of what sexual harassment is and excusing it for bill clinton. >> dana: let's be very clear. if i had said this or let's say ann coulter had said this, everyone on the left would have come out and wanted her head. hillary clinton says it in all of them are silent? that's ridiculous. it's been going on since 1997 they have to keep revisiting it because they didn't deal with it appropriately then. they are not dealing with it appropriately now. every single interview they give they have to answer for it again. over and over again. why do you think you lose? this is exactly why you lose.

i have been mad since 1997. [laughter] >> katie: coming up, anti-trump celebrity alec baldwin ratchets up the rhetori rhetoric. no matter who rides point, there are over 10,000 allstate agents riding sweep. call one today. are you in good hands? whoooo. did you know the same hotel room... ...can have many different prices? that's why tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites to find the lowest price on the hotel you want. your perfect hotel room...

for the perfect price! tripadvisor. the best simple salad ever?d great tasting, heart-healthy california walnuts. so simple, so good. get the recipes at walnuts.org.

♪ >> pete: i can't name this song but i should be able to. after rolling out his trumpet. he again on saturday "saturday night live," hollywood hothead alec baldwin headed to a democratic fund-raiser in new hampshire to double down on the left's divisive rhetoric. >> we need to overthrow the government of the united states under donald trump. not in any violent or unlawful way, but it must be overthrown nonetheless. let's make america great again by making donald trump a casino operator again. >> pete: a lawful overthrow? juan, whether it's regime change or harassing or confronting or illegitimate administration, the left finds every verb they can do to find this administration. are they going too far?

>> juan: no. he's very careful. in fact, he said the way we overthrow governments in this country is at the ballot box. >> pete: why didn't he just say vote? why is it always overthrow? >> juan: in the age of donald trump, you are complaining about hyperbole? >> pete: that's a fair point. but what do you think? alec baldwin plays trump on "saturday night live." he makes a caricature of it and he walks out on the campaign trail and makes a similar argument. >> katie: asking for civility or political correctness in terms of language is one thing but we have a record now democrats, a democrat shooting up a baseball field. democrats like maxine waters to get in the streets and get in the faces of republicans. we saw ted cruz attacked at a restaurant. a number of officials in the trump administration. that's the problem. it adds onto this frenzy of real physical behavior we've seen and he's not doing anything to help

bring the temperature down, tell people to get out to vote. we don't really want violence. condemn the violence we've already seen. >> juan: you should mention this to your "lock her up" friends. >> katie: which ones? >> pete: this kind of rhetoric, okay, out-of-bounds, inbounds? >> dana: i don't really judge the rhetoric. basically saying overthrown nonviolently which means get out there and vote. i think it was constructive. he's in new hampshire doing a fund-raiser. we are talking about the midterms but we are already talking about the 2020 election. they are in new hampshire for a reason. mike bloomberg was there. he's planning to run as a democrat. they could have 35 candidates. get ready for your rhetoric metered to be off the charts. >> pete: alec baldwin says if he ran for president, greg, he would win. >> greg: this is the thing that bugs me. i don't have a problem with

heightened language. drain the swamp is an analogy. it's not like d.c. is filled with alligators but he is saying there are republicans and democrats who are swamp rats, swamp creatures. i'm okay with it. the only issue is that because the left traffics in radical revolutionary rhetoric. heightened rhetoric tied to the ballot box, as you say, i don't see it as a big deal. but i'm tired of him saying that if he ran he would win because he's a real wuss, if he believes that to be true. that's my heightened rhetoric. if you think you can win, throw your hat in the ring. that would be a really good thing. it would be exciting and interesting and he's kind of outside the box. he is there trump. he says a lot of incendiary things. he said tv shows, talk shows. he foments controversy. >> dana: he never said he was

native american. >> greg: and he is more native american. >> katie: we are all native americans now. >> greg: what a great first family if he wins. >> pete: juan, what do you think? >> juan: entertaining. i think what greg is saying it would be wildly entertaining. the piece i saw today talking about so that's where we are. the age of celebrity politics. oprah winfrey, alec baldwin. what does this say about us about the country? [laughter] >> pete: you already have 100% name i.d. that is the advantage. we live in a media world where the people need to know where you are. >> juan: the media landscape determines your leader. it's like the tailwagging the dog.

>> greg: we have "one more thing." >> pete: let's do it. up next. now your insurance won't replace it outright because of depreciation. if your insurance won't replace your car, what good is it? you'd be better off just taking your money and throwing it right into the harbor. i'm gonna regret that. with new car replacement, if your brand new car gets totaled, liberty mutual will pay the entire value plus depreciation. liberty mutual insurance. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ if you're waiting patiently for a liver transplant, it could cost you your life. it's time to get out of line with upmc. at upmc, living-donor transplants put you first. so you don't die waiting. upmc does more living-donor liver transplants

than any other center in the nation. find out more and get out of line today. (woman) we'd been counting down it was our tresiba® reason. he needs insulin to control his high blood sugar and, at his age, he's at greater risk for lows. tresiba® releases slow and steady and works all day and night like the body's insulin. (vo) tresiba® is a long-acting insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. don't use tresiba® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. don't share needles or insulin pens. don't reuse needles. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which may cause dizziness, sweating, confusion, and headache. check your blood sugar. low blood sugar can be serious and may be life-threatening. injection site reactions may occur. tell your prescriber about all medicines you take and all your medical conditions. taking tzds with insulins like tresiba® may cause serious side effects like heart failure. your insulin dose shouldn't be changed without asking your prescriber. get medical help right away if you have trouble breathing, fast heartbeat, extreme drowsiness, swelling of your face, tongue or throat,

dizziness or confusion. (woman) we found our tresiba® reason. find yours. (vo) ask your health care provider about tresiba®.

>> following is a will make upon us, i hate halloween costumes they are so boring image up to fight my body. i thought we would have some costumes. this is from the show that we offered that are fair and

balanced. >> introduced in the news this costumes comes with a black shirt, khakis and a tie. or how about the steve doocy? this awesome-looking dark chocolate, light shirt, khakis and a tasteful tie. we even have tucker carlson with his one-of-a-kind dark jacket, light shirt, khakis and a bold but tasteful tie. [laughs] >> that was mean. >> it is a fun saturday afternoon for me in washington, d.c., this weekend. i spoke with the museum about my new book, "what you have to lose customer" here are some pictures from the event. as you can see was interviewed by john maynard, it was a great turnout. there was a major presence, thank you so much. here i am signing books, talking to some folks. lots of people at questions

about the museum and the state of american journalism today covering president trump. it is difficult. it was a great afternoon, mike thanks to the museum. >> great. >> dana: chris has two boys and they came to visit me last weekend and brought me these amazing things. the seasonal flavored m&m. i went and i got some from everyone. this is neapolitan. you can open these up and try them here. we have strawberry. what is this one? raspberry. mint chocolate chip. >> that is going in my pocket. >> espresso, anyone want espresso? >> how about this? white pumpkin pie. >> that is very alt-right. [laughs] >> i am 2% pumpkin pie. [laughs]

anyway, they are really good. i can't get enough of the mental ones. thank you. >> did they make them? >> no, they bought them. they brought them to me as a gift. >> pete, you are next. >> never been to a concert but i'm a big fan. i'm told the concerts are always full of surprises. they were at the center in kansas city. they pulled up a 10-year-old, his , and they played metallica, watch this. ♪ >> that is a 10-year-old from the audience. dave grohl handed him his guitar. he immediately started playing, enter sandman and the band played with them. the kid says, metallica knows

who i am, dave grohl gave me his guitar. i think my bucket list is done. amazing! they gave him the guitar and he just started to play. do you think you learned from the internet? from youtube, "guitar hero"? >> we need more guitar players. >> last week i was in israel visiting the borders of syria lebanon and gaza. i have some photos for you. i was there for a fact-finding mission. here is the law with the west bank. this is obviously the western wall. this is a view in lebanon. those hills you can see. this is a sign next to the syrian border. also we have a photo of a fence. neighborhood next to gaza. as you've seen with the reporting, there have been lots

of rioting and they think things are going to start heating up more than they already have. we were there getting some interesting information from officials. >> thank you for taking us on that trip and giving us some information. >> special report is up next. >> bret: hey greg, how are you you? >> bret: this is a fox news alert. we might be nearing an answer for what happened to a saudi journalist after disappearing to go to the saudi consulates in and stumble turkey. sources now say the saudis will eventually admit that he may have been killed accidentally during an interrogation. that news comes shortly after president trump set his top diplomat to the kingdom and turkish and saudi arabia investigators do that for the consulate. we have coverage tonight. john roberts is at the white house and tells us what he is hearing there. we start up with correspondent