an important race in texas, ted cruz, that is happening this saturday. we will always be fair and balanced, let not your heart beat to maccabee troubles. there she is in the swamp. >> laura: every time you say they or she is then you go right to sue work or swamp. that is just not -- that is not a ringing endorsement. okay, you're not exactly in the gutter there in new york. give me the breakout here. are you having a barbecue? i'm coming on this trip. >> hannity: you will join me on the program i hear tomorrow. >> laura: yes. >> hannity: bring your best game. >> laura: i will come with both hands to type out my back, no problem. i will save it for tomorrow.

>> hannity: with half my brain tied by my back. >> laura: [laughs] great show as always. this is "the ingraham angle." can you believe it? 21 days until the midterm election. we have a lot of ground to cover. the american voter, you've a lot to consider. they're so much on the line. the largest caravan and a deck it approaches our southern border. the president's response and minor ahead. plus the new tactics of the left might not be so new. 1968? the former speaker on the parallels between that faithful year for the democratic party and what is happening today. we will have a new series for you tonight, the head and scandal, how the media's coverage of certain democratic candidates really amounts to a cover-up. i tonight or announcement of a texas candidate, you want to stick around for that. victor davis hanson is also here.

but first, the midterm border brush and possible electoral crush. that is the focus of tonight's angle. ♪ is her cable competitors are devoting hours of coverage today to the president's tweets about stormy daniels, voters i think are tuning him out. why? because the voters are smarter than the media thinks they are, as usual. americans outside the leftist activist bubble are focusing on issues that actually affect their daily lives. pocketbook issues. the stock market jumped 500 points today, that is good for your 401(k). the labor department reported that there are 7 million job openings currently in the united states. our industrial output is surging them all fantastic news. americans also see some trouble on the horizon as well. lawlessness at the border, no society should tolerate. we have another mass of people,

as many as 4,000 i am told. another so-called migrant caravan making its way from honduras to the united states. president trump has had just about enough. >> we have the dumbest immigration laws in the world. the world laughs at us, but we are getting them changed. we need some more republicans. >> laura: i will say. for many years voters have been telling politicians, enforce the border and close immigration loopholes. in fact even on the issue of legal immigration, a lot of people don't know this, the country is not clamoring for big increases. check this out. only 28% of americans want immigration levels increased. 29% of americans want them decreased. of course most politicians continue to just ignore the wishes of the people, so what

they do is continue to expand things like distant relative chain migration. they refuse to allocate money to the building of the entire wall of the southern border. they refuse to pass legislation to allow for immediate border turn backs of anyone crossing the border illegally. and of course, democrats are against all rules. donald trump won the presidency in large part because he wouldn't expect the status quo on immigration. as usual, he was five steps ahead of most every republican congressman on the issue. in july they found that americans identified immigration has the top issue for them going into the midterms. last month it was the second most important issue tied with just general economic problems. democrats thought that a focus on the typical issue of child separation, a practice of the administration has now ended,

that that would turn out to voters and get democrats or latino voters really excited to get out there. i don't think it is working for them. remember back in 2016, at the latino voter turnout did not increase. despite trump's push for the wall and a lot of stronger immigration enforcement. of course hispanic americans are themselves disproportionately affected by the impact of illegal immigration, and their neighborhoods and their communities. ditto for black americans. the good news is that as the second caravan drama unfolds, it turns out that some establishment republicans are waking up to the wisdom of trump. >> it makes the immigration debate more on trump's terms. there is no right to come to america. we can have rules of who comes. where is mexico? they need to help us. last time i checked you just can't walk from guatemala to

hear without going to mexico. >> laura: oh, yes, the president warned the president of honduras come with the large caravan heads into the u.s. and does not stop, he will cut off foreign aid. vice president pence has warned them about honduras, guatemala and el salvador to tell their people do not make the dangerous trek to america. the u.s. will not tolerate this blatant disregard for our border and sovereignty. by the way, honduras is on track to receive $65.7 million in foreign aid from the u.s. in the upcoming fiscal year, 2019. back to the midterms. as frustrated as so many as lsr, the cause may be totally lost if the open border democrats take the house while the president is focused on important things like abolishing the illegal immigration gangs come ms-13, democrats want to abolish i.c.e. >> we need to rebuild our

immigration system from top to bottom. starting by replacing i.c.e with something that reflects our morality. >> we can replace it and we can replace it with a humane agency that is directed towards safe passage. >> laura: safe passage? everybody come on in. they are not alone of course. there are a lot more like them that believe the same thing. again, they could not be clear for the midterm voters. there so much on the line for america. we'll trump get the funding for his wall? will the mass migration of other countries in central america we stopped at all? ever! will travesty such as birthright citizenship finally be ended? will we mandate to penalize businesses who gain the system to keep american wages low? of this my friends you can be sure, your views on immigration

will have zero impact and zero influence on a house dominated by democrats who want to replace you, the american voters, with newly amnesty to citizens. an ever increasing number of migrants. if republicans choose to unite behind the presidents immigration policy, the way they just did in the kavanaugh fight. this will stoke voter enthusiasm even further ahead of the all too important midterm elections. that is the angle. joining us now with reaction, mark is the director of the senate for immigration studies, tom homan the former acting director of i.c.e, he is the strategist and former dnc deputy press secretary. fellas, the moment ago the present anticipating the angle i'm sure pretty tweeted about this very issue saying "we perform the country of honduras, guatemala and el salvador that if they allow their citizens or others to journey through their borders, up to the united states with the intention of entering

our country legally, all payments made to them will stop." tom homan, you have the most experience in this issue. if the president right here and has approached? >> yes, i think he needs to throw down the gauntlet. we give these countries a lot of aid. the other issue that the president needs to be aware of is that the remittances. they get billions of dollars a year from their citizens who live in their country, that amounts to billions. when it comes to this caravan as i said last night, the president needs to work with mexico and mexico needs to stop the mothers with them border. do not issue them transit visas >> laura: hosea, it is not a lot compared to what we give to other countries but it is not chump change you there. i'll put up the graphic. 2017 we gave them 144 million,

2018, 50 million, guatemala, they're trying to stop the caravan from coming through, and it hasn't worked. 2017, 229 million, national disaster, 76 million. what about her sovereign right to protect our borders from what amounts to an organized effort to crush or rush the border right before the midterm election? >> first and foremost, let me just say that it makes no sense for the president united states to threaten honduras and sam not going to give you this money if you let these people go through guatemala and mexico. it makes no sense. less money for central america? what will happen will be more crime. the caravans or just get bigger. it makes no sense. i don't have the president thought this through shared this happens every day with his tweets. he should stop tweeting altogether. to your point laura, these people under u.s. law of the

legality to go to reporters and seek asylum. they can do this. they should do this because as we know every single year, a percentage of those people can actually stay in this country. these are people who are fleeing horrible conditions. >> laura: how many other countries exist on the earth where people would like to flee generally a corrupt government? they've had corruption throughout the entire region for so many years. of that really is the standard and that seems with the standard is today, we better prepare. this is going to be a wholesale migration from venezuela where we have seen 2 million people flee. ultimately they can get from venezuela up to central america come up to mexico and the united states. you'd be okay with that? >> they should have a right to do so. let me be clear, i met for open borders, i don't think every single migrant who crosses the

border should have the legality. they should have the right to at least be heard. >> laura: we don't have the facilities to at least hear people, millions of people. if that is the standard. mark kerkorian, we are compassionate country we help people in need all across the globe, on cnn today this reporter who was covering the migration, she is very pro-migrant. nevertheless she made this point. >> many of the programs that this money pays for, those programs are to try to prevent violence. to try and help people with poverty. if that aid is taken away the people who run those programs will tell you that you will likely see more immigration. you will likely see larger numbers at the u.s. border. >> there are plenty of ways we can put pressure on these countries.

really, what is the point of being a superpower if you can't try and get a tiny little country in your backyard to do what you want? honestly, the most important target of this kind of pressure is actually not central american countries, it is mexico. they are all passing through mexico. mexico is the much more functional states. it is wealthier, its government works better which is why mexico is really responding to the pressure. i just saw the way over here they are sending large numbers of federal police down to mexico to stop these people from getting over. that is the key before they ever get here. >> laura: a relationship with mexico with the upcoming president is actually going to improve. to deal with the new nafta u.s. mexican canadian agreement, it is a good start. i don't think they want to muck that up. tom homan, this is right up your alley. august 2017, the border rest between the ports of entry, and the mouse to

the month of august. august 2018, 37,544. these are people crossing. that is a 68% increase. from year to year and a month. >> they stop? we have a judge saying you can't separate. we've a judge so that we can't deport. we can't attain enough of them because congress has not funded i.c.e properly. to get back to my friend here, as far as they have the right to claim asylum, people leave honduras have to pass through guatemala and mexico. they are no longer in fear of persecution in country. this isn't about escaping fear persecution, they can make asylum in mexico. this is about getting to the united states. they're taking advantage.

80%, that is just a fact. >> laura: under obama they were turned back to 80%. >> how would they know? >> again, they pass through two other countries before they get to the united states. many claim asylum in mexico. he escaped from your persecutio persecution. >> laura: not an international law, does not count as a country where you can claim asylum. i know that is a fact that mexico might want to change that. it is a place where you are allowed -- because they have accepted request by some of the migrants. i want to talk about who is funding the caravan. there is a question, and the hundred foreign ministry, corruption everywhere there. they've identified today, political sectors as culpable. unidentified influences, somebody is funding these caravans. there is no way that these

people who are the poorest of the poor can afford what is it, $427 per crossing? with the cartels give to play, the human traffickers are involved who is paying for this? somebody is paying for this? or they are selling themselves or their family members into some kind of slavery if there's somebody tried to pay for this. does not raise some questions? >> i think we need to educate american people on this. by not controlling this caravan. this caravan comes across, all the loopholes that congress has will be released. it will entice more people do come. the memory, we are bankrolling the exact organizations that smuggle these people. the same organizations that smuggle guns, drugs and the kill people. >> laura: congress has to act. congress has got to act! the president is doing as much as he can hear. he puts the migrants lives and dangers come up its children's

lives in danger. it helps the cartels become more and more powerful. jose, want to play this for you. this is in spanish but you can read the subtitles about why he is moving with this massive caravan. let's watch. i understand that. people want to dump the united states but he is not siding a credible spear of persecution. he just wants to come to america because probably a lot of us family members are already ther there. that is not an asylum. >> i agree with you 100%. we should do a better job as a government to communicate to

other countries, it is not easy to get asylum. you can come and you can try but most folks are not going to get it. >> laura: ports of entry makes it more dangerous and they had to make that 1,000-mile track. when not to apply from their home country? >> laura: they don't have that luxury. >> you are saying that they're not going to have asylum and most of them, even under obama, 80% were denied. the point is, they are already in the united states. they been working may be for several years already while their cases going on. when they are finally denied in the end, they just don't show up. nobody is looking for them. the whole point. >> laura: they get here and then it is a get out of honduras or guatemala free card. they know they will be able to stay. >> less than 5% of the cases have been removed. the gentleman there, the reason he didn't use that is because he

has been coached. once he gets to mexico, he will be trained on what to say to pass that first test. >> laura: you start looking at the lines, they are all the same. my friends, thank you so much. for more on why trump won and how the g.o.p. can do it again, grab a copy of my new paperback. "billionaire at the barricades:" now in bookstores everywhere. up next, newt gingrich here in the studio to explain how closely today's democratic party might resemble what we saw from some of them ending late 1960s. stay there. ♪

i wanted more from my copd medicine... ...that's why i've got the power of 1-2-3 medicines with trelegy. the only fda-approved 3-in-1 copd treatment. ♪ trelegy. the power of 1-2-3 ♪ trelegy 1-2-3 trelegy with trelegy and the power of 1-2-3, i'm breathing better. trelegy works 3 ways to... ...open airways,... ...keep them open... ...and reduce inflammation... ...for 24 hours

of better breathing. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. trelegy is not for asthma. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling,.. ...problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain occur. think your copd medicine is doing enough? maybe you should think again. ask your doctor about once-daily trelegy and the power of 1-2-3. ♪ trelegy 1-2-3 save at trelegy.com.

>> laura: 21 days until the midterms and democrats look to be stalling. it's like 1968 all over again. the more you see the visuals,

the lack of any tangible policies and where you start to realize that they are embracing the same theme. victim culture, mobs versus jobs, stripping away law and order. so on and so one. here with his thoughts on this, the mass of humanity crushing her border, former speaker of the house, newt gingrich. he is the author of "the new york times" best seller, "trumps america." so great to have you here. i know you want to talk about what we just talked about first so i'll let you hit that. think this immigration issue is not the most important issue facing the country today in the eyes of the voters and the economy, it is one of the top two or three. donald trump is always been ahead of everybody else on this issue now we have another scene of lawlessness coming up through mexico and honduras. >> first of all, kevin mccarthy has offered the best bill in december. to do whatever it takes to

strengthen the border. i will make one key point about all this. this is insanity. imagine if it was your home. the people down the street say, i like your home, i will come and claim refuge. 6,000 people show up and say, i hope you'll take care of me. it is crazy. we are to adopt a policy that says for the mexicans, nobody is crossing the border. if you don't want to stop them coming in from honduras, they are going to be in mexico. i would do whatever it takes to control the border. period, and of story. >> laura: congress has to act. i'm glad mccarthy has come along to the gospel here. >> if you actually control the border, they don't enter u.s. space. >> laura: they can walk through a port of entry and claim asylum. we have to change that whole process. >> i'm for changing that. i'm saying the ports of entry of necessary, if mexico won't

cooperate in stopping these people it will be amazingly difficult for anything to get through the ports of entry. >> laura: that would get their attention pretty quick. >> about three days. >> laura: you will agree this is a big issue for republicans. >> it is the fate of the united states. 165 million people would like to come to the u.s. you can possibly observe that. even left-wing cuckoos can't believe that. >> laura: 1968, one of our mutual friends were talking the other day, one of the great guys and radio. he said, do you see some of the parallels going on here? it looks that they will move right from this 1972 would nominate a far left guy, of course george mcgovern and 1972 but before that it was a build up up and a lot of violet hatred. >> with him last weekend in des moines.

the hard left which is now much of the left is committed to believing that they have the right to bully, to attack, to trash you. he has said publicly, it is a hard left group. in portland people are being harassed while the police said there and watch. people need to understand, the left today, the democrats today stand for breaking up the whole process. abraham lincoln said it brilliantly, "you will rule or you will ruin." the modern american left resembles those southern owners and their commitment to rule or ruin. that is why he is saying, scratching the supreme court door. >> laura: favorite image of the year. >> the closest they get to the supreme court seat is scratching at the door. >> laura: [laughs] business a moment for

republicans, united behind the kavanaugh nomination. look at what happens. the country was motivated. they are excited. this isn't fair. we wish all the best of all these women but it is not fair. basic principle of fairness. >> a woman talk to me last night who said, the democrats are 75 years old, she was, she switched parties after kavanaugh and every member of her family had switched. she was disgusted that this is no longer the party of john f. kennedy. >> laura: again, we have a situation where america and a midterm cycle, usually you see the party in power lose seats. they have been a few occasions in which i did not happen. >> didn't happen 1934, it didn't happen 1998, didn't happen in 2002. i think this year we're going to gain seats in the senate for sure. i think the way that things are developing right now because of kavanaugh.

because people are disgusted with the democratic party. there are little frightened by it. i think we might actually shock them. >> laura: on one their undercover videos, this involved claire mccaskill and a staffer talking about whether she is really open-minded on certain issues. let's watch. >> you think she is more progressive than she lets on. >> open-minded to alternative routes. she can't be open about that. she will completely isolate the moderate republicans. >> it's like have to lie to get elected. >> essentially. >> they do have to lie to get elected, that is why he is lying in tennessee, that is why a

mccaskill is lying. go down the list. it is a simple test that every american can apply. or even a vote for chuck schume chuck schumer? if if you can vote for him you e a liberal, period. and of story. people in west virginia ought to, vote for mcconnell. >> laura: he voted for the disastrous obamacare. >> of all these folks back home, about the person you thought i was in washington and i didn't mean to do it. please elect me again. if you're going to vote for chuck schumer, your a left-winger. therefore i have to vote against you. >> laura: the unseeded eric, one of the big signs that populist revolution is coming when that happened. that has a tight race. that could go either way. you can't choose the democrats

here. that is going to take your stay backwards. you want to go forward. dave brat and so many people like him are supporting trump, this is why the economy is growing. >> the choice is jobs or mops is real. be clear, the lowest black unemployment and history, the lowest latino unemployment in history. the economy is growing. the fact is, the democrats promised to for all that away based on their socialist ideology. >> laura: the left still think that devoting hours of coverage to stormy daniels. the president that a tweet out. they think the voters are going to turn out because of a tweet. they still don't get it. >> they don't get it. people ought to look at the stop and say to yourself, do you want a party that has been delivered in results for the last two years or a party dedicated to resistance? that is what the choices.

the average american is going to look at what is happening and i think they're going to conclude that in fact republicans have a doing a pretty darn good job in the democrats are frankly kind of scary. >> laura: results versus resistance, newt gingrich, we love having you. thank you so much. the democrats are sure that hillary clinton could leave them to victory, the coalition of women that included white women, when that didn't happen they became the new enemy. we reveal the examples, next. ♪ it's time to get out of line with upmc. at upmc, living-donor transplants put you first. so you don't die waiting. upmc does more living-donor liver transplants than any other center in the nation. find out more and get out of line today.

( ♪ ) everybody wants a new, different, better world. here's to the people who do what it takes to build it... to keep it running. the people who understand no matter what the question, the obstacle or the challenge, there's only one answer... let's do the work. (engine starts, hums) ♪ >> laura: 152% of them voted for trump, the left found a new target to derive. white women. an odd voting bloc to alienate the head of the midterm elections. don't you think? the last couple of weeks they've been called white privileged apologists. "new york times" opinion piece noted that they will defend their privilege to the death.

following the cavanagh votes, susan collins and others supported the basic principle of due process were called the race apologists. who can forget earlier this year would hillary clinton claimed white married women only voted for trump because of their husbands. >> we don't do well with married white women. part of that is an identification with the republican party. an ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever believes you should. >> laura: joining me now to react, rachel campos along with the speaker and activate. is it wise to alienate a voting block that is pretty big? white women? some of the things that are being said it is like a whole

voting block stigmatized based on their race. at that we are supposed to get away from that? >> clearly. we are supposed to get away from that. i don't think it is a issue of stigmatizing and entire voting block. it is looking at people who don't vote and aligned with the particular group we are talking about. for time of the left which is a multitude of people who just left of center. there are a lot of opinions. there is a lot of diversity. they are talking about the white women who voted for donald trump. they're not talking about all white women. >> laura: white women can't vote for conservative? >> every american should have the right to vote for whoever he or she. >> laura: michelle bernard who was a -- she is great. she made an interesting if not controversial point on am joy. let's watch.

>> i do not see any reason for democrats to believe that after the brett kavanaugh hearings we are going to see a flood of white women, particularly republicans, come out and vote for democrats. whatever's going to happen in this midterm election, it is going to be because of the vote of black women and other women of color. >> laura: rachel campos, your reaction? >> i think this whole thing come everything we have seen over the last three weeks, brett kavanaugh, kanye west, the total meltdown. the lawsuit in harvard between the asian-americans who are suing over affirmative action and even senator warren with her clinging to the idea that she still is this hope, that she is native american. what we are all seeing is the death throes of identity politics. it is finally reaching the ends of its game. it is becoming so ridiculous to

tell people because they are women or because they are black or because they are asian or white how they should think and how they should vote. people are rejecting this. frankly i think it is why they voted for donald trump in 2016 because as crazy and is as some people might think i'm untraditional he ran his campaign. they felt this was the last hope to try to break this down. i think it's starting to break down. especially with kanye west and now you are saying they're going after white women and telling them that they are traitors of their gender. it is ridiculous. >> laura: hear something, i want to read this. this is from "the new york times," the headline is "white women, come get your people." white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources from useful gain. it seems that white women are expected to support the patriarchy, mirroring within

their racial group, reproducing whiteness and even minimizing violence against their own bodies. white women who voted for trump did so to prop up their whiteness. i have got to say, that is one of the wildest things. i read a lot of wild things. i don't know anyone who thinks that way and i don't know any women who are smart, working at home or working out of the home who votes because of their husbands or think about a patriarchy monopolizing their thoughts. you seem a purely smart person, how is that not really condescending to women? >> let's be real aside from the carville marriage, most people marry people who think similarly. >> i.d. assume that the women are man? >> what i am saying is it is not

a hard point to make that like mary's like. you tend to marry somebody you think like. at that is the argument that was made in a "new york times" piece. >> laura: the assumption obsesh the whiteness. it is not breaking through to a lot of people. they just want a better life. they don't want an obsession is with how the other day with stacy abrams were she said, i represent black, white, disabled, differently abled. pacific islander and then it was, the undocumented and documented. everything is too hyphenated. i think people want to be more unified. more hopeful about being together as americans like we were after 9/11. what is wrong with that? >> i don't think we need a terrorist attack on american soil before we recognize that.

>> we don't have to go back. we can find that in other ways. >> laura: we could find five major things that we agree and if we set down for an hour. about confirmation come about how to treat animals. rachel campos duffy, president rouhani just have to be careful, women's vote is sensitive. it matters. the tone does matter. i don't play the horse faced thing was smart, i have to say. that wasn't my cup of tea. >> it was grotesque and unnecessary. that said, we need to get away from talking about gender and skin color and and two is more oppressed. we need to talk about ideas. we don't need to go back to 9/11, we need to do is go back to mlk sandwiches we need to be about the content of our character is not the color of our skin. that is the american people want. i think that they are voting that way and they are responding

to because they are tired. they're just exhausted from identity politics. >> laura: i think we have to end on that unfortunately. what a fantastic conversation. thank you so much. the new cycle by the way as in many ways you could say been breaking towards trump lately. richard davis hanson is here to explain why that is. watch his reaction to the suggestion that trump is somehow to blame of the saudi journalist being killed. stay there.

eric always wanted to be a professional basketball player. instead, he's the tallest guy in his office. yeah, eric's had to compromise a lot in life. ah yes, you need travel insurance when you travel. so, should i set some... hello? but not when it comes to cutting the cord. fubo gives him all the sports he needs as well as all the shows his family loves. don't compromise. get over 100 channels plus showtime and cloud dvr included. visit fubotv.com.

touch shows how we really feel. but does psoriasis ever get in the way? embrace the chance of 100% clear skin with taltz, the first and only treatment of its kind offering people with moderate to severe psoriasis a chance at 100% clear skin.

with taltz, up to 90% of people quickly saw a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms, or received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. ready for a chance at 100% clear skin? ask your doctor about taltz. ♪ >> laura: are democrats destroyed what was shaping up to be a really huge blue wave? the approaching care caravan has put a spotlight on this issue. the kavanaugh show the left shameless tactics.

they show they care more about promoting anger than solving problems. kick them when they are down. joining is not to discuss, richard davis hanson at the hoover institution. it is great to have you with us. what do you make of the recent political calculations we have seen from the democrats? many of them of course with 2020 ambitions. >> it is almost like -- i thought they would at least try to disguise their empathy and politics before the midterm midterms. your past segment about a white this and white that's, this is a time after the 2016 elections are usually appealing to the white working class if you want to admit those states and yet they're not doing that. we said during the cabin hearings, why not protect american due process. when we get done with that circus it was as if the democrats wanted to be on the side of the

french revolution. when we had all these demonstrations, scratching on the supreme court doors, you would think that somebody in the party would speak up against that. as ted you correlates with what cory booker said, even hillary clinton. it was as if these people were seen as a paramilitary wing of the democratic party. the height of silliness, why would elizabeth warren come out when you have this high profile trial by asian-americans against harvard come in the same city. she complained mike proclaims that she is 1% at best and therefore all along was a minority. she should apologize. it is topped off by this caravan commode to the democrats going to do? are they going to say let the men because they have a right for refugee appeal? anybody knows my right mind that you can't have a nation when

people storm across the southern border by intent and they are empowered. >> laura: it's a huge plus for the republicans. the president is so far ahead of everybody else. all the other politician, he sees it and he knows it's a problem. he wants to fix it. he is very frustrated with congress. i also want to talk about foreign policy. that is really your forte in many ways. this khashoggi murder at the consulate and turkey, there are actually liberals blaming this on somehow on the chaotic foreign policy of president trump. he addressed these general issues tonight. let's watch. >> you will start here and, what is happening? we are all looking at it. turkey and saudi arabia are looking at it very strongly. it depends whether or not the

king knew about it. whether or not they knew about it. if they knew about it that would be bad. >> laura: i don't think most american voters, aside from the barbarity of the american voters, this isn't the issue that motivates them on the election time. it is extremely complicated. >> yes, to paraphrase winston churchill about the soviet union, it's inside a mystery. when you coincide a embassy in you expected to be a sanctuary and we are living in 2018 at the medieval period. that is stunning and shocking. on the other hand, mr. khashoggi was a u.s. resident, there was a lot of drama to this. on the other hand, a lot of shock has been that we are not shocked by what they have done,

it is embedded with our relationship with saudi arabia. that said, what we're worried about in geostrategic terms, we've had in alignment with the monarchy, confront the existential dread of a nuclear iran. people in syria. we don't want to jeopardize that new alignment. and yet we don't want to condone it and i think trump is trying to square that circle. it is very difficult to do. >> laura: it is a balancing act. the president is trying to do it, it is not easy. the idea that he can be blamed. richard hoss is like, at some point it becomes an immoral foreign policy. it has reached such a point. you won't even bother with that. the consulate foreign relations is not speaking for most americans. thank you so much, we appreciate it. coming up next we have a new

series, hidden scandals revealing with the networks will not tell you about certain candidates. our expose and part of the texas democratic senate, it's next. ♪

>> laura: a new segment, hidden scandel," with the media is not telling you about certain candidates. with the midterm elections just three weeks away the media are picking teams. one of their favorite players this cycle is beta o'rourke. the democrat challenging ted cruz for senate seat in texas. the profile fawning all over the new star left just before even one make a primary. february 19th "the new york times" essentially dubbed him the lone star long shot. time and may said he is on a

long, hard road. the descriptive is handsome and charismatic. in august, meet the men democrats help with the next obama. going on to add, is the man who could save the world from trump? finally "vanity fair" said, calling him kennedy. as it turns out, beta o'rourke is more kennedy asked that we thought. what those features failed to fully examine as his dwi. the details of which were much worse than previously reported. the news of the details that were finally revealed in a chronicle piece. he had this to say when confronted about the incident during a debate. >> i did not try to leave the scene of the accident though driving drunk which i did is a terrible mistake for which there is no excuse or justification or defense.

i will not try to provide any. >> laura: his answer here directly contradicts the police report obtained by the "houston chronicle," and it a witness report that he was driving drunk at a high rate of speed and then lost control and hit a truck sending his car careening across the median and to oncoming lanes. the witness who stopped at the scene we are told police that he had tried to drive away from the accident. the medias puff pieces on him have scarcely mentioned a 20-year-old dwi dabble in the incident at the even mentioned it at all. what is more surprising, to shunt little interest in calling eli. all right, we'll be right back. last bite is coming up once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than seven and maintained it. oh! under seven? (vo) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study,

adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (vo) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? ♪ ozempic®! ♪ ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation.

some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ (vo) ask your healthcare provider if ozempic® is right for you.

>> laura: it is time for the last bite. >> a be the smartest candidate ever to run for the president of the united states. he continues to art smartly left

me democratic party. unless they start to respect the fact that he is going to be in office for two terms they will not prevent that. >> laura: poor michael, does he ever washed that baseball cap? god bless him. but as all the time we have, shannon bream and the team take it from here. >> shannon: should be sent him a fox news cap? you might work that into the rotation? >> laura: i will let you do that. write a nice notes. >> shannon: will get right on that. thank you laura. we begin with "fox news at night." ," heading to turkey to talk about the mysterious case captivating the world. the missing washington journalist. reports and at that turkish believe they virtually solve the case. lawmakers here are angry. senator lindsey graham joins us in just a minute. texas