. -what's happened to my son? -i think that's just what people are like now. i mean, with progressive, you can quote your insurance on just about any device. even on social media. he'll be fine. -[ laughs ] -will he? -i don't know. ♪ >> tucker: this is a fox news alert. the man suspected of mailing dozens of pipe bombs to media figures has been arrested and charged in the state of florida. cesar sayoc jr. has been in charge of five federal counts and could face decades in prison if he gets convicted of those. fox news miramar, florida. phil? l >> the man accused of mailing political pipe bomb packages to 15 high-profile democrats over the past four days is behind bars tonight, including two copresidents receivingo these packages which has put the

nation in a chaotic watch for the suspect for three days. 56-year-old cesar sayoc described by those who know him as a hateful, disturbed man with political views seen walking from the fbi miami building to an suv being transported to down to miami's detention center. 56-year-old sayoc faces five federal counts including illegal bailing of explosives and making threats to former presidents. if convicted on each, he faces 48 years in federal prison fordi the rest of his life. suddenly the fbi made the arrest at an auto zone parking lot in broward county. that revealed the man's very unique band which he had been

living in placard with dozens upon dozens of ideological stickers and decals, including one of president trump rising from the flames of a burning american flag and a hillary clinton face in the vcross hairs. that van covered with a blue tarp and escorted under heavy guard, all broadcasted live on national tv. this afternoon from washington, the attorney general said any political zealot who turns violent of any stripe will pay heavily. >> we will bring the full force of law to anyone who attempts to use threats, intimidation, and outright violence. we will find you.at we will prosecute you to the fullest extent ofl the law. >> federal investigators suspected the package bombs may have come from the south florida postal sorting center and overnight, sure enough, after evacuating the building, fbi, miami police found bomb number 11 addressed to democratic senator cory booker who was there but not yet sent to his

office. sayoc has a history going back numerous years that includes a 2002 threat to use a bomb and a 2014 shoplifting case. those put his fingerprints in the national database and that helps fbi agents make a match to a fingerprint found on the package sent to california's maxine waters. >> tucker: phil keating in florida. thank you, phil. former secret service agent joins us today. dan, this is always true, not exactly what we expected. when this man is apprehended, he turns out to be a middle-aged male stripper that identifies as an american indian. these bombs may or may not have been operative. what do we know about this story? that we didn't know yesterday? what conclusions can we draw from the fact we have right now? >> i can say i've worked c protective intelligence cases in

the secret service for many years which of the cases we investigate their cases, basically. out of the new york office, which was very busy, the pattern here is not that unusual. i've discussed this on fox a couple of times before, tucker. when you see movies like "in the line a fire," people are influenced by what happens in hollywood, you see a target similarly focused on one subject. with "taxi driver," that's not the way it works in the real world. what you see is pretty covered with what you saw with theor accused attacker today which we call target shifting where they pick multiple targets at the same time. that's more common in the real world. from our perspective it's indicative of a greater danger than that one person who focuses on the one -- stalks the one person. >> tucker: sure. what do you make of the fact that none of these devices exploded? i want to be clear that doesn'tc

minimize the terror they inspire, it's horrifying. does it tell us something that they didn't go off. was he in the next bomb maker? what can we conclude? >> only two explanations on it. he intended them, as you say to inspire terror, no less devious as he said. but obviously less deadly. the second exclamation number which i believe is more plausible in this case, he just was completely inept, and the word i think used is inaccurate. he was entire, completely inept. the facts of this case, thankfully, i say that in a positive way, the mistakes in this case is incredible. spelling of names to see and then where john brennan doesn't even work, the use of tape? that's how they get fingerprints. tape. that's how police officers h

get -- it's an amateur hour operation, i don't think he intended these things not to go off. i think he was really bad at this if the accusations are correct. >> tucker: if this man did what he is accused of doing, the profile is what you would expect. again, this is a man in his mid-50s who identifies as seminole indian and has worked apparently for decades as a male stripper. you typically think of crimes like this as being committed by young men. he's not. neither was the shooterr in las vegas. are we wrong in thinking that mass killing is typically inspired or carried out by young people? >> well, in this case, tucker, i would attribute a lot of this and i'veas seen this in some of the investigations i have conducted were mail was used to narcissism, it may be a play

here. i mean, extreme narcissism. i mean looking at the mirror and coming your hair. these are allegations, of course, but he was a steroidou user, obsessed with working out. you are the guy to turn this around? it's actually not uncommon and target shifting is important. that was a bull's-eye to me that this person was a bigger danger than he was letting on if we had found evidence that they were targeting multiple people at the same time. w it's not just the quantity of people, it's the fact they are so obsessed with doing something that they are not willing to focus on one person, they'll get anyone. the profile is pretty serious. >> tucker: it's a very weird story. very weird. finding out more. thanks, dan, very much. good to see you. >> yes, sir. >> tucker: thousands of

central american migrants making their way to our southern border to claim asylum. meanwhile the city of san francisco, which is completely out of control and filthy, wants to let illegal aliens vote in some local elections. that will make things better. that's next. the president meanwhile rally i supporters in charlotte, north carolina, as we speak. we are monitoring that rally and will take you there live if news occurs. occurs. >> look at this crowd. it's crazy. [cheers and applause] go out and vote. now when you book a flight you unlock discounts on select hotels that you can add on to your trip up until the day you leave. add on advantage. only when you book with expedia. experience the lexus rx with advanced safety, standard.

lease the 2018 rx 350 for $439 a month for 36 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. we distributeus, i'm the owner environmentally-friendly packaging for restaurants. and we've grown substantially. so i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. and last year, i earned $36,000 in cash back. that's right, $36,000. which i used to offer health insurance to my employees. my unlimited 2% cash back is more than just a perk, it's our healthcare. can i say it? what's in your wallet?

♪ >> tucker: the president threaten to close the u.s.-mexico border and cut aid to various central americann countries in response to the massive caravan of migrants make its way slowly up to mexico. secretary general jim mattis also ordered 800 troops in anticipation of their arrival but roberto hernandez is an immigration advocate in san francisco said that he's happy the migrants are coming. thanks very much for coming on. i don't expect to convince you to change your views on immigration. we've talked many times. i know what they are -- but i applaud you being more honest than most people are saying saying out loud what you really want. tell me the justification for this group coming here is that if they wanted asylum, they could apply. are they claiming they are

refugees fleeing a war? if so, what war? what is the justification of this?? >> good evening. w first of all, let's go to our history. >> no, let's not. let's go to the question. >> look at all the europeans that came here -- this was a native american and europeans came here. >> you've demonstrated a -- i just want you to ask my history right now. can we just stick to the question? what is the justification, what is the legal justification off these people coming to the border and that the u.s. embassy? >> if you look at the role of the united states in central america, in nicaragua, y honduras, guatemala, in other countries in latin america, the united states has promoted wars to protect corporate interests

in a lot of these countries. you have a lot of people who have been affected by these wars and it's cause poverty and aes t of these countries. currently, there is a politicalf climate in a lot of these countries and people are coming here looking for refugee -- >> i'm going to try to take you seriously -- >> the united nations -- >> nothing the united nationsnio me. i'm trying to take you -- the first caravan is coming from honduras. what wars are you specifically talking about the united states promoted and when did that war end? u what are you talking about specifically? >> specifically look at the role of the u.s. government in honduras.

>> tucker: what war are you talking about? >> let me ask you this.ut do you know of any involvement in the u.s. in honduras? >> tucker: what you are saying you don't really know what you are talking about, but you are throwing out -- >> you have a show just to talk about -- >> tucker: roberto, i'm trying... i'm asking you specifically what war in honduras are you talking about that the united states inspired that justifies this migrant caravan? when did that war end? what year? what are you talking about or do you not know? >> i do. let's look at the role of the military of the u.s. currently in honduras. >> tucker: but you said there is a war. so you are totally ignorant of the history of honduras but you are lecturing us about our

responsibility to let the people in because of a war that we started but you can't tell us what war or what year it ended? i think that's what you are saying? >> not only that, but it's the involvement of the u.s. in honduras and central america. >> tucker: obviously history is not your subject. i'm not -- >> united nations is currently the caravan. why would they be supporting and helping them people? >> tucker: i can't imagine why the u.n. does a lot of things. >> the u.s. should stop and let the people come here. >> tucker: let's see if you can answer this. san francisco has now announced that illegal aliens, people who have no right to be here, will be allowed to vote in local school board elections. you live in the city and think this is a great idea. do you think americans who sneak into other peoples' countries should be allowed to vote in

their elections? >> let's look at how many white people live in mexico. the mexican government doesn't harass them. >> tucker: are they allowed to vote in elections? >> look how many people did not vote in this last election. look. look at the numbers. >> tucker: okay. i would say as a performance artist you are talented, but i want one straight answer. do americans who sneak in other people's countries without permission allowed -- do they have a right to vote in those countries' elections? do i have a right to sneak into mexico and announced that i get to vote there and if you don't let me, you are a racist? is that a human right that i possess? >> in san francisco, these individuals that are being allowed to vote are only voting for the election for the board of education. >> another question unanswered. >> these people should have the

right to vote specifically for those who are going to make policies and decisions that affect their children. >> tucker: so i give you simple questions. couldn't come up with an answer. text me later if those answers come to you. roberto, i appreciate it. thank you very much. he's a senior fellow at the hoover institution in the bay area and he joins us tonight. so it does raise, i think, tell me if i'm overstating the importance of this, but california allowing illegal aliens to vote in the school board elections could be written off as it's just a school board, but philosophically is that different fromom letting them ve in any other election? >> well, it's the beginning of the erosion of the federal electoral laws that we saw with sanctuary cities.

it's part of the message that we are sending, if you have 500 jurisdictions where immigration alaw doesn't apply and you stat allowing people to vote in local and maybe state and eventually federal it sends message to these caravans there's a ready 22 million people who came illegally, there is another 40 million who came illegally. and in a place where if you get across illegally you'll be able to function as a citizen. the caravan people have a lot more strategic assessment than we do. the governments of central america and mexico get $60 billion in theirce remittances. they want it.et employers, it's a boom economy. they need cheap labor. the identity politics as your guest illustrated, they want them. the only people who want toit uphold the law are theeo ordinay voters without a lot of clout. i think they understand there is only two ways to stop them once they get here, tucker.y you either you have to have a wall or use force. eight hundred soldiers as we saw border patrol as the crash they will not stop them. tyou need three divisions. we don't have a wall. the optics of using tear gas or

rubber bullets will be as bad as children being separated and that's what they are counting on. what we need is what every country in the world throughout history -- saudi arabia has a 500-mile wall, israel has a wall, greece, europe, that changes the dialectic and it changes them becoming a physical barrier and they have to become an aggressor and the people who might get through our young males who are easily more deportable than women and children.ge we say to them, this is our wall we don't want to oppress them, stay on your side. if we don't have a wall we have to be preemptive and how to use force and they count on that. i think that's -- i'm not optimistic. >> tucker: i'm not optimistic at all but i also wonder if this is not the end but the beginning. these -- by a recent historical standards, things are relatively peaceful in central america. what if there really is a revolution or another civil war or a natural disaster in any of

these countries? we potentially get an enormous wave, like, a real wave? tens, thousands of people coming to the border. >> i i think we are. i live in a state where one of every four people is not born in the united states and only six to are legal. this is a time where we rejected assimilation, integration, the melting pot, adopted the identity politics. we are getting into a tribal society. one final thing about your speaker.r. he said the western civilization in california is an artificial construct, but they have many alternatives of indigenousns people. they can make a left turn and gc south into oaxaca and join into a -- they are going into an artificial civilization according to a speaker that they should detest because it's antithetical to the native american experience. when we formed california. there were only 15,000 mexican nationals in this huge state.

it was almost empty. this myth that there were millions of indigenous people and they were displaced? this so-called "white europeans" is historically inaccurate. we didn't have these discussions when we believed in the melting pot and had secure borders andnd legal measures, diverse immigration.n. >> tucker: of course. many mexican nationals are descendants of mexican conquistadors. democrats have been promising america a blue wave for months. are they going to get it? some of their wackier candidates may be slowing that wave down. lisa boothe has been taking a close look at thesee candidates and she joins us after the break. also monitoring the president's rally going in charlotte, north carolina.a. stay tuned. >> president trump: stop catch

and release, end the basil out a way that we talked about, end chain migration and we will keep the criminal drug dealers and terrorists the hill out of our country. all in one relief of heartburn and gas ♪ ♪ tum tum tum tums tums chewy bites with gas relief when the guy in frontd down the highway slams on his brakes out of nowhere. you do, too, but not in time. hey, no big deal. you've got a good record and liberty mutual won't hold a grudge by raising your rates over one mistake. you hear that, karen? liberty mutual doesn't hold grudges...

how mature of them. for drivers with accident forgiveness liberty mutual won't raise their rates because of their first accident. liberty mutual insurance. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty ♪ from the international fellowship of christians and jews. there is an emergency food crisis for elderly holocaust survivors in the former soviet union. - this is a fight against time. what we're dealing with is coming out, meeting someone who's 85, 90 years old, can't get around, has no food, has no water, and just wants to give up and die. and that's where we come in. we are called to comfort these people, to be a blessing to their lives. - [voiceover] for just $18 a month, you can send life saving food, heat, and medicine

to an elderly person in desperate need. call right now. - in ukraine, there's no support network. they don't have food cards or neighbors that come in to help. they're turning to us because they have nowhere else to turn. - [voiceover] your monthly gift of just $18 will help save lives by sending regular food, heat, and medicine to a desperate elderly holocaust survivor. it will help them live out their final years with dignity. call right now. - what i pray is that you won't turn your eyes, but you will look at their suffering and your heart will be changed. - [voiceover] with your gift of just $18 a month, you will bring food, heat, and medicine on a regular basis to suffering elderly who have no where else to turn.

call right now. >> tucker: midterm elections is less than two weeks away. democrats have raised unprecedented amounts of money, really historic amounts. historic levels of voter enthusiasm and they hope that

will lead to a metaphorical blue wave. the only thing that stands in the way, the quality of some of their candidates. it's low.e law professor katie porter, democrat running for congress in a basically republican leaning district in orange county california. porter submitted to a progressive activist group and she shows she supports the creation of "the department of peace building, dude" as long as reparations for african-americans and left-wing ideas that most people think are stupid. lost the endorsement after the members revolted against her candidacy. she has been caught faking key aspects of her biography, calling her state quote the meth lab of democracy, welcome to arizona, and set on a radio show said that she did not care ifb americans join the taliban.

lisa boothe is a senior fellow at the independent writer'sti voice and joins us tonight. thank you for coming on. first to this candidate in orange county, california. is she in step with the voters of this district, you would say? >> no, she's absently not. that's what's so crazy about the fact that it's so competitive because as you mentioned this is orange county. clinton did win district by 5.4%, but this is a republican leaning district. but katie porter said that isto her mentor.e this is someone she admires. planned parenthood, antigun group, every progressive organization you can think of. she is out of step with her district. she supports bernie sanders' single-payer system that would give health care to illegal immigrants. supported california becoming a century state so you go through the policy she supports that entirely inconsistent with the

district she's seeking tour represent. >> can be a lot more specific about the department of peace building? would there be a peace building seal team that creates peace by force? did she put meat on those bones? >> it doesn't sound like a very dangerous group to be a part of, though. oulike seal team six you go through rigorous training -- i don't think -- >> tucker: it seems like a big deal in the arizona senate race for any professional union to withdraw an the endorsement is close to an election. how did this happen with the state troopers? >> this is the thing, she's been running with the endorsement too bolster horror law enforcement and also on immigration issues, border security.se this is a big deal for her. the group put out the endorsement and found that the members were not so happy about it so now they are deciding to

be neutral in this s race, i thk the border security issue is big because she's also been part ofr this recall no more deaths that helped and aided illegal immigrants trying to cross the border and this group has said about u.s. border patrol, they engaged in systematic torture. this is a group that's been critical of border -- also compared illegal immigrant death to that of troops dying. she's running from all the comments that she's been trying to position herself as a moderate in the senate race. >> tucker: those remarks, comparing the deaths were really far out. i don't think we are shading those are taking them out of context.th that's pretty unbelievable. lisa, thank you. you been on this for us and i appreciate that. >> thanks for having me, tucker.

>> tucker: does your right to free speech include your right to have views that organizes islamic groups that you don't think you should have the right to have? toria speech code has come europe. we are not that europe isn't the only place free speech is threatened. our leaders don't support it either. authoritarians in silicon valley wage war on speech every single day and they are winning, we are sad to tell you. that's discussed in our book "ship of fools" available for purchase on tuckercarlson.com. that's discussed ♪ come fly with me, let's fly, let's fly away. ♪

♪ come fly with me, let's fly, let's fly away. ♪

they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper

get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again! >> tucker: a european court has determined that a muslim is right not to be offended takes priority over at majorities right to free speech.

for suggesting that mohammed's marriage to a 6-year-old constituted a form of pedophelia traditionally they would have been, but things have changed now for the european court of human rights disagrees with her. affirm her conviction, said they need to balance her "quite of freedom of expression" to the right of those to have their religious feelings protected. a columnist for a "reason" magazine and he joins us tonight. thank you for coming on. as a factual matter, did i miss that any of that?om are those the facts of the case? >> those are the facts of the case. it's pretty shocking.a in 2009, this woman whose name is not being given out in public, she gave a seminar in

austria in which she said that mohammed behave like a pedophile and charged with being inciting -- the european court of human rights has decreed that the court was right to punish her for making these comments and furthermore the european call human rights establishes precedent across europe that we've now effectively warned all europeans your forbidden to make these comments about mohammed. >> tucker: a standard that hasma long prevailed in the islamic world, you can be punished for criticizing mohammed, it's now t law in europe. >> exactly right. what we are witnessing in europe is the return of blasphemy law through the backdoor. people fought long and hard in many european countries forhe te right to question religion, to mock gods, to make fun of prophets. this is a long hard fight for liberty. it's now being overturned i by these new forms of blasphemy law

which really are rehabilitating medieval laws which tells us certain things about religious gods and profits not allowed to say.y. i think it's terrifying to attack onll freedom of speech. >> tucker: viewers are free to attack the bishop of canterbury. the first vanguard are journalists, that's the role in society, but my sense is the european sense has not acted like the house is burningg down to this. they have not raised a cry over it. or have i missed that? >> they haven't. not yet. i'm optimistic that something might happen because this is a pretty extreme case. the problem we face in europe, of course, is that islam has offered the kind of protections that no one else enjoys. we have a word, islamophobia's for any fear -- there is an

culture of conformism and censorship around the issue of islam in particular which means that unfortunately many journalists probably will not take to task this court ruling the way they should. what we have to recognize is freedom of speech by its very definition includes the freedom ee offend and what the court hao done, it has said that people's religious feelings trump the people of speech. i think that's a really dangerous road to go down on.re because nobody is feeling shoulh trump the right of anyone's else to say what they believe. >> tucker: and of course. this is a much longer conversation which we can have, but it's not a failure to defend speech but it's also a continent wide self-hatred. what people are saying is the culture, our culture, should bow down before another culture, minority culture from another part of the world -- a healthy society would not take this

position, right? a society of self-hatred? >> that's absolutely right we are demolishing one of the key principles of modern europe. in the light of the enlightenment and the renaissance, europe launch itself forward and started to believe in freedom, choice, the right to express yourself. we are we are backtracking on those great historic gains and we are allowing a new form of censorship to come through. i also think it's a very dangerous ruling. we have many radical islamists in europe, and the court has now basically said it's impermissible for people to say, this thing about mohammed. what message does that send to these people? it tells them that if they hear someone say this, maybe they can punish them. >> tucker: exactly. >> exactly in the way they did with charlie hebdo. this is green lighting violent responses that are critical to islam.ie

>> tucker: nbc news in "time" both effective p.r. for creepy porn lawyer, why? will explain it to you next. why bother mastering something? because when you want to create an entirely new feeling, the difference between excellence and mastery, is all the difference in the world. introducing the all-new lexus es. a product of mastery. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.

a product of mastery. dad: oh, hey guys! mom (on speakerphone): hi! son (on speakerphone): dad, i scored two goals today! dad: oh, that's great! vo: getting to a comfortable retirement doesn't have to be an uncomfortable thought. see how lincoln can help you retire on your terms at lincolnfinancial.com

>> tucker: if you've got a television set in your house, you know well that the media has been celebrating the creepy porn lawyer as a herovi for months ad months. turns out they are actively helping him by holding back damaging information about him from you, the public. the creepy porn lawyer said that democrats absolutely need to elect a white man in 2020.

saying something like that would've instantly wrecked his political career, there is nothing that offends democrats more than that phrase. have no fear, "time" did not tell you that, democrats didn't know for months because i sat on the t story. meanwhile, creepy porn lawyer became a national figure. nbc news to the similar thing. when creepy porn lawyer and his client accused brett kavanaugh of participating in a long series of public gang rapes, remember that, produced a statement that seemed to back up some of her claims. you vaguely remember this. two days later, the woman recanted the story to nbc news reporters. she quoted that cpl "twisted her words." nbc news had information that undermined accusation against brett kavanaugh. it would be nice to know that

before the vote, but they didn't tell anybody. are you surprised? only if you imagine nbc news was still a news organization and not a particularly clumsy arm of the democratic party. which is they are because it was nbc that leaked the access hollywood tapes to "the washington post" before the general to influence the outcome of that election and -- they did later protected democratic donor and accused harvey weinstein. it wasn't enough for creepy porn lawyer. even with nbc's assistance, his client stormy daniels was ordered to pay donald trump's legal fees. not a law firm that he runs is facing eviction for failing to pay his rent. he still wanted the best known democratic candidates for president, though. how is he likely to do?

chris hahn is a progressive -- he joins us from long island for a creepy porn lawyer update. >> thank you. >> tucker: here's my theory. creepy porn lawyer makes baseless charges against brett kavanaugh, charges him in participating a rape, and not one democrat criticizes him until he endorses the idea of a white man running for president until all democrats say this is over. why didn't anybody note that before? >> hold on a minute. i have criticized him on this network several times and said he'll never be the democratic nominee for president. i love his haircut and it's fantastic and very efficient but i've criticized him politically. i think he's the reason why susan collins voted for brett kavanaugh because i thought the sweatnik allegations were outrageous and hard to prove, that said he had an affidavit from a client. he was not defaming kavanaugh.

it was the client. look, there are lots of problems -- >> tucker: i agree with you until they are. i can't let you away with the lawyer dodge that it's the client. it was creepy porn lawyer who took the deposition who was the vehicle by which the rest of us knew that these allegations were made. by the way, these allegations are taken with dead seriousness by every news organization in the nation, that they show, and democrats never say, wait a minute, 10 gang rapes in a row? democrats stood and they nodded, that's very serious. >> a lot of people took at less than serious and a lot of people dismissed it and thought this was adding something to what was some veryeo credible allegations against kavanaugh. look, we call them creepy porn lawyer because he represented a porn star who we know was paid

did not discuss her affair with the president of the united states. >> tucker: can i just ask you a question? she took money for a voluntaryni relationship in exchange for not talking about it. we used to call that extortion. but now we are totally cool with it and we are blaming the guy who had to pay the extortion money? how does that work exactly? are we for that now? >> we actually don't know w exactly how the money was proposed. in fact, it could've been proposed by the person who wanted to cover it up, not necessarily the porn star. we never got to the bottom ofo that. the president's lawyers settled the matter so i think they were happy with the arrangement. >> tucker: they didn't want to talk about it so they must be guilty, but you are totally cool if people have a consensual sexual relationship and one of them gives money enough to talk

about it -- >> i'm not. >> tucker: where is that? >> i am not in favor of extortion. i was just pointing out your calling him a porn lawyer. we know why we call him a porn lawyer. we have to know why we call him a porn lawyer. it's not like he was trying to get more money from the porn station. >> tucker: creepy porn lawyer. thank you so much for clarifying all that. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: former trump campaign manager george papadopoulos says he was framed by the fbi seeking to undo a plea deal he entered with robert mueller. ed henry has the latest on that tonight. >> tucker, i was there on "fox & friends" when george

papadopoulos stunned us in this exclusive with brian kilmeade flat out charging he was framed by the fbi that he may -- she may pursue a tile what he calls a entrapment case. when he pleaded guilty to lie to the fbi, this would damage president trump, instead papadopoulos was sentenced to 14 days in prison. an emerging from his testimony in capitol hill thursday the clearing he's with how all of this turned out. a far cry from last october. people in the media were theut clearing his cooperation with mueller would be bigger thaner e indictments against paul manafort although trump aides said papadopoulos was a low-level aide. krista lizza of cn," what papadopoulos already admitted to doing, lying to -- is a very big deal. a bigger deal than the dozen

counts laid out in the manafort indictment.t. back in december, "the new york times" published a story saying it was papadopoulos' 2016 meeting with an australian diplomat that launched the fbi's probe without any help from the clinton finance campaign. the fbi did not talk to the diplomat until the counterintelligence probe was already launched. and there was a code name. cross fire hurricane. >> it's suspicious that when he drops this information on me. >> unsolicited! >> they want to figure out info on this particular topic.nf it seems like it was some sort of sting opportunity gone bad to be quite honest with you. >> republicans on the hill believes that suggest special counsel was launched based on trumped up charges. democrats continue to insist no,

all about the president's allies trying to undermine mueller's findings which we now expect to come after the midterms. tucker? >> tucker: ed henry, thanks a lot. democrats tell us they believe survivors, but not all survivors. we'll tell you which survivors they believe after the break..

>> [chanting "we believe survivors"] >> [chanting "we believe survivors"] >> [chanting "we believe survivors"] all times, all cases, because women all tell truth. they do not make false allegations, ever. you cannot doubt them. skepticism is hate. without a standard in mind, we have been watching the keith ellison case pretty carefully. he is the democratic congressman from minnesota running for attorney general for minnesota. his ex-girlfriend has accused him of physically abusinglf her.

we do take women seriously, we asked her on the show to tell her story. here's how she described the democratic party's response to her allegations. watch. >> if you look on social media, if you see some of the letters that have been written that basically say they don't believe me, the folks who have signed on, it's pretty apparent. there's been a lot of bullying, there's been a lot of harassmen harassment, isolation, by many folks that i stood side-by-side with, supporting them in their campaigns. >> tucker: democrats don't believe me, she says, turns out she was right. just yesterday, the chairman of the minnesota democratic party put it this way. "i don't believe her." apparently it is time to revise the believe all women rule. it turns out democrats believe a woman who makes allegations that

can be politically useful to them. the rest are ignored granted tax. that is the real rule. that is it for tonight. thanks for a great week. he will be back 8:00 p.m. monday night, the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. have the best weekend. ♪ >> sean: welcome to "hannity." tonight i suspect believed to be responsible for this week's mail bomb scare has now been arrested. in moments we will tell you what we know about the strange deranged individual. we are now on day four of what is the medias shameful attempt to connect president trump, fox news, talk radio, even me, to those horrible actions of a mad man. coming up, we will take on the left wings smear merchants. we will call their hypocrisy and respond to all of this outright slander. once again the left is trying to score cheap political points in the victory by vilifying all trump