about it, it doesn't matter why, but they refused to accept the results. it is a horribly dangerous thin thing. and >> sean: one week from tonight you have the power to shock the world. let not your heart be troubled, laura ingraham is next. >> laura: you had a great show. anything else you want to say? >> sean: no, it's good to see you. great interview with the president last night. >> laura: happy anniversary? come on! one year on the show, i've done the show for one year tonight. >> sean: oh, happy anniversary. [laughs] >> laura: i'm going to call jill. jill will say, this is exactly what happens to me. that's sean's wife. >> sean: excuse me? you didn't wish me happy anniversary when i started my 23rd year? >> laura: what what's the 23rd anniversary, like aluminum?

>> laura: 25 is silver, 50 is gold. >> laura: am i going to see you monday in new york, or am i going to come on your show or something? >> sean: i think so. come on my show on monday. we love having you on. >> laura: all right, we will hang out monday. i am up laura ingraham this is "the angry ham." tonight we expose the whistle and blow the whistle on another shady part of this. earth tourism. now you don't want to miss this unbelievable story that we will highlight tonight, it doesn't get nearly the coverage it should get. and as a second caravan now clashes with police at the guatemala mexico border, the guatemalan equivalent of our chief will join us tonight to tell us what his services have discovered about who is actually

behind of the caravan organizing. plus, the race to abolish free speech. a scourge once relegated to college campuses is now essentially infiltrating every facet of political life. tonight we will show you how one phrase has been used repeatedly to silence trump and his supporters. and as i said, it's our one year anniversary tonight so make sure to and stay for some of the highlights and low lights -- no. just the highlights of our interviews for the past years. but first, when birthright goes wrong. that's the focus of tonight's angle. from the second president trump announces plans to address birthright citizenship earlier today, the left freak out. here's what the president told axios. >> president trump: we are the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby and that baby is essentially a citizen of the united states for 85 years with all those

benefits. it's ridiculous and it has to end. >> have you talked about that with council? >> so we are protest. process? >> laura: they were quick to announce the president and condemn even raising the idea of ending birthright citizenship. >> is if we needed it, there's more evidence that immigration remains the president's animating issue. this new proposal to end birthright citizenship. >> is talking about birthright citizenship and i think he's done not just simply to inflame the issue. >> i mean, this is the hard-line immigration message, the fear of immigrants changing the way of life of americans. >> it hearkens back to some of the darkest chapters of american's history where in 1857, the scott decision. >> laura: move over encyclopedia britannica. this is default behavior of all those deflected with trump

derangement syndrome. when faced with an inconvenient troop. they demonize the president, and dismissed out of hand of the issue. heaven forbid we actually present the american people with a factual unbiased presentation of the issue. first of all, president trump had already committed to ending birthright citizenship during the campaign, so aside from his mentioning the drafting of executive order in the pathway to fulfilling his promise, it's hardly a news flash. and why is this an important issue in the first place with the president? a lot of it goes for the money. consider the number of children born to illegals each year. back in 2010, the center for immigration studies estimated that between 300,400,000 are born to illegal aliens in the united states annually. now that figure is found to be a lot higher today given the new research that the number of

illegals in the u.s. is at least double what was originally thought. or, about 22 million. let's conservatively say that 400,000 children are born every year in the united states to illegal immigrants. while those are people that hardworking u.s. taxpayers have to educate, and for whom they provide health care, and in many cases food stamps. obviously infrastructure, et cetera, et cetera. cis estimates that the annual cost to the u.s. taxpayers of children born to illegal aliens is a staggering $2.4 billion. you think our vets and our homeless and our inner city schools could use that money? maybe we could even pay down some of the debt. to borrow down a little further, a 2015 cis report found 51% of immigrant headed households used at least one federal program.

cash, food, housing or medical care compared to only 30% of native households. and we aren't just talking by the way about folks on these over stays or who cross the border illegally. many of you would be stunned it to know that there are entire industries both here and abroad that are now devoted to gaining the birthright citizenship system. it's called birth tourism and its become big business in the united states, attracting immigrants from china, taiwan, mexico, russia, and turkey. what they do is they purchase package deals, where they come to the u.s. for a month or several months and have their baby on american soil. for upwards of $50,000 to those foreigners guaranteed u.s. citizenship for their children. it's wild.

and they also can sponsor the parents for green cards. that's pretty nifty. so i'm sure this is what our founders intended when they were drafting the 14th amendment. contrary to what obama the mantra is provoking a conversation that i think is sorely needed in the country. rather than just castigating the president or caricaturing his position. why not have a substantive debate on it. up until now, trump is the only president who is willing to have that debate. what am i afraid of here?

and that's the angle. dr. john eastman is a senior fellow at the claremont institute and constitutional law professor at chapman and anniversary. anna fox news contributor. john, i want to start with you because you wrote in "the new york times" that birthright citizenship is not actually in the constitution. so why does the left think it i is? >> they have misunderstood one of the causes and the constitution. there's actually two requirements for automatic citizenship. you have to be born on u.s. soil, and you have to be subject to the jurisdiction. they read that last clause out of the constitution as if it's not there, as if it means the same thing as being physically present there but for those that ratify and those that drafted that language, it meant subject to the complete jurisdiction, not subject to allegiance to any foreign power and that is what mandates birthright.

out what and certainly the peope who are children of to and are not even lawfully present in the united states at all -- president trump's executive order just wants to get the constitutional right. >> laura: the reaction today was over the at top, hyperbolic, and pile ryan said this, i believe it was on a radio show. let's listen. >> you cannot infect citizenship with an executive order. obviously as conservatives we believe in the constitution. you know, as a conservative on a believer in following the plain text of the constitution. i think it's pretty clear. >> laura: andy mccarthy and paul ryan, outgoing speaker of the house, not giving it trump any credit there.

he is we have to have congressional action. it is that true? >> i think they should have congressional action. this is a constitutional prevention of the 14th amendment where we are not only just dealing with the constitutional provision, it's also been codified by congress. i think they made a pretty clear that they want to weigh in here and rightly so, that they are the supreme branch of the three in terms of defining citizenshi citizenship. i think there's a very good argument that trump shouldn't do this by executive order, as a practical matter i must tell you, i think the way the supreme court lines up, the only way they have a chance of succeeding on what i and my friend john eastman think is a correct policy is getting it done by statute rather than executive order. when ryan said the constitution is pretty clear, i don't know what constitution he's reading because as john just pointed

out, there is a very strong interpretation of it that goes back to the people who actually defined it at the time that it was ratified that runs 180 degrees different from the way that ryan is interpreting i it. >> laura: john eastman, i want to go back to you on this. again, i think people and andy talked about how this has been codified by congress. section 14 oh one, of the applicable code. what is andy talking about? does this mean that the president as the chief executive officer of the united states, with a concern of who comes into the country and who does not, and who gets citizenship and who doesn't, explain the 14 oh one issue? >> congress has a statute that defined citizenship but uses the exact same language as a constitution, so we have to figure out what the constitution means.

there are two requirements, born here and is subject to the jurisdiction. if a british citizen is over here as a tourist, he has to comply with our laws while he is here. he drives on the left side of the road and not the right side of the road. but he doesn't get drafted into our army, he subject to the partial territorial jurisdictio jurisdiction. what the president is trying to do is just enforce that law as written. i will give you one very good example and i think andy will agree with me on this. you have to be a citizen to get a passport and the one thing that everybody agrees with is the subject of the jurisdiction clause excludes the children of diplomats who are here. and yet our passport office is unlawfully giving passports and deeming as citizens the children of diplomats who are clearly not covered by the 14th amendment. so the president's executive order could tell the passport office to quit violating the law which would be well within his rights as the chief executive of

the country. >> laura: chuck grassley looked like he agreed with paul ryan today. i want to just go through the list of countries, which really doesn't matter because we have our own constitutional understanding but it does not offer citizenship. australia, austria, denmark, france, germany, israel, italy, japan, norway, slovakia, south korea, switzerland, spain, the u.k., none of them offer this type of birthright citizenship. and we will get into this in a moment. it does create perverse incentives and this birth tourism issue that we are getting in deeply to hear, it's a huge problem. we have horrible situations happening in new york and california with their abuses and so forth. how do you think this ultimately comes out? >> i think a lot of it depends

on how it goes up to the supreme court. when you hear people defend this, what they say is this is absolutely what the 14th amendment requires, they never say this is good policy because its indefensible policy. but i just think having fought the old military commissions battle back ten or 12 years ago, however long it was, there was a lot of authority that president bush had to unilaterally order military commissions and the court told him nevertheless that he needed congress. if this goes up to the supreme court or executive order, it goes up to the statute for a chance. >> now onto that story, there is shocking story, something called birth tourism, a phenomenon where foreign nationals come to this country to just give birth for the explicit purpose of securing citizenship for their

infant. just in the last month, in a story that got very little attention, a worker at one of these host homes went on a gruesome attack, stabbing two adults and three infants. one of them only three days old. this particular site was used primarily by a chinese citizen seeking get that all important passport for their infants. ming lee chan is an immigration in new york in the area that this birth center was broken up. this story got very little attention. you pointed out that some of these birthing centers are properly registered and some are not. explain that. >> from the experience of dealing with my clients and targeting other customers, i learned that some of the maternity centers are registere

registered, and they are primarily registered from day care. they are doing some type of service to give to the infants, they are providing this and that service without telling the government. >> laura: in this particular case, it was hideous. "the new york times" and new york post did big stories on this at the time. the carnage happened around 3:40 a.m., and, they attacked a 63-year-old colleague and stabbed three baby girls. at 3-day-old, 2-week-old and 1-month-old. women show up twice a week pregnant and have their children there, all right under the news

of new york officials. >> a lot of these operations are going to be like this, kind of sleazy -- i won't say black market but they are not properly registered. and there are that or higher quality, but this seems to be a discount operation. if you really have a lot of china will make money in china and he wanted to get a u.s. passport for your kid, there are higher and versions of this kind of thing and it's not just chinese. there are russian birth tourism, people from mexico, this is a big business and it's all legal. these people are not breaking our laws, we are the ones who have this set up of rules that lets people have a kill it, kid here, wait a month or two for the passport to come in the mail and then they leave. at least the children's illegal immigrants actually grow up here, these kids never grow up as americans, they grow up in china where they grow up --

>> laura: and they want the passport to reinforce this point why? >> it depends on the people. one, it's an escape hatch. it's a way to get out or at least get the kid out. the last helicopter off the embassy are much more likely to have your kid on it if it has a passport. number two, it's almost a retirement program for some people. then they have an easier way of getting into college and finally for some people it's a way of dodging the draft. if you don't want to serve in the turkish army, and i wouldn't, this is a way -- you send your kid here. >> laura: this is not what our framers intended. as china cool with this? you work with a lot of immigrants from china, or people who come here as tourists and they do this birth tourism.

but is china okay with this? not a problem? >> china doesn't care. they don't care somebody is coming out of the country and going to the united states to give birth to the baby. they don't care if that person or any person like that, unless they do something bad to the government. giving birth to a baby has nothing to do with the chinese policy. >> laura: so just anyone can go to china and get chinese citizenship, right? >> as far as i understand, the chinese policy is not. >> laura: while of course, you have a little different system there which is fine but you probably want to control their immigration and citizenship a little differently. thank you so much. for more on how chump one and how the g.o.p. could do it again, grab a copy of my new paper paperback, "busting the

barricades." coming up, a new migrant caravan is storming into mexico from guatemala. the head of the guatemalan strategic intelligence is here with some inside info about who is behind these new efforts. stay there.

>> laura: a new migrant caravan is storming violently towards our border. authorities telling associated press that the migrants quote attacked its agents with rocks, glass bottles and fireworks come up with some allegedly carrying guns and even firebombs. as these mobile mobs barrel toward our border, we are learning more about who is actually inside the first caravan. check out this interview

griff jenkins conducted with one of the honduran migrants in the original group. >> are you willing to break the law to get back to the united states? >> he says he wants to apply for pardon for the felony he committed. >> can you ask him exactly what happened? translator a third-degree felo, attempted murder. >> laura: william la jeunesse stayed up for us and joins us on the ground in all walks, mexico, for a live report. william, thank you so much for staying up. >> i will tell you that the migrants we have spoken to know they are criminals among them. that's why they hate hang out in groups of five or ten or 15 to watch each other. we have interviewed so far to gang members, one from l.a. and

one from houston. a human trafficker and a drug trafficker from north carolina who said he can't go back because he will be "killed." the large groups they are seeing on the southwest border, 100, 200, sometimes 300 people, for there to be criminal aliens among them, that's not uncommon. we've also been told by law enforcement sources that mexico has been cooperative providing intel to the u.s. that indeed there are people that have criminal records and in fact that is why president trump, when he says there are bad guys here, he's not wrong. >> i didn't want to run from the border patrol. i just want to be legal and safe. >> most of us running the caravan, we are not dogs. not all of us, but there are some people going here that it's

true, they are a bad person. >> so that first guy you heard from, he was human trafficker that got arrested in texas with three illegal aliens in the truck. so here are the stats from border patrol. 2016, almost 13,000 illegal aliens arrested and it's gone down from them. the offenses ranged from murder to sexual assault, the largest criminal reentry of dui, domestic violence and assault, burglary and theft. the u.s. is doing what it can, it knows there will be people there which is why one of the reasons president trump is doing what he did. but a lot of people here are uninformed about what to expect from the united states. for the first time yesterday we saw u.s. immigration lawyer down here who works with migrant groups telling them how to pass a credible interview. saying, i was threatened, who were you threatened by and what's the relationship, why you couldn't go through the police, those kind of things. so those things that they did

with the caravan in march and april in terms of telling people how to make it into the country, we will have to see with the changes a president is making whether that's possible or not. >> laura: just one question. how are they moving from point a to point b? we see all this video of various flatbed trucks, are these just random people where they are like, come on board and we will give you a ride? how does that work? >> it started out walking, then they started hitchhiking and then different towns have heard about them, of course getting publicity down here, so you are right. buses, trucks, cabs, vans like this one, they will pay a dollar 50 to go from one town to the next. sometimes they will go 40 or 50 miles. tomorrow they are staying here and we'll get transportation, we will go talk to the government about their demands. now back to you. >> laura: that's a lot of money, to pay for 150 buses.

so why do the caravans keep coming? joining me now from guatemala city is a bottom guatemalan secretary strategic intelligenc intelligence. we heard from some officials in your country that there are certain organizations funding your caravans. what can you tell us about them? >> before we start, i wanted to wish you happy anniversary on your great show. now back to your question, as you might have heard from the president from honduras, he spoke with vice president pence. they have detected some ngos funding this caravan. and other more organizations

that might be working with the security agencies. >> folks in the united states wonder, why can't guatemalans fix what ails guatemala? i've been to guatemala many times, i have a beautiful daughter who was born in guatemala, it's one of the most beautiful countries. natural resources, natural beauty and incredible people. but obviously, a long history of difficulty and corruption and concern, how do you deal with that? that is a big problem. a lot of people are from honduras, but before that guatemalans were mixed in as well. >> we had detected, guatemala is a great country.

and we had some difficulties with different ideologies. we had a 36 year internal conflict, and we had to work through that with our citizens and to get of that situation. we've been working on that very hard. the president jimmy morel as has been putting emphasis on building up our institutions, and working with partners in other countries. >> laura: mr. secretary, your country was not able to hold back that initial caravan, nor was it able to hold back that second caravan that was making its way through mexico now, nor could mexico. why couldn't you hold them back, and, as president trump white

about that? >> we are looking at different situations. central american countries and our citizens can freely move between the countries so as long as they carry their national i.d., and these caravans as you have seen from different videos, it's a very big group of 3,000 people. and guatemalan security forces, let me say really quickly, we put 2,000 police officers and close to 1,000 in the military. >> laura: but you couldn't hold them back, mr. said, secretary. >> we tried very hard.

and they are almost like human shields. they do our best to protect their lives and protect their human rights and their dignity as well. we have to protect these people, and that is where the rest of the caravan over past our security forces. >> laura: mr. secretary, we really appreciate it and we hope we continue to work with the united states government. this caravan has got to stop. it's unsustainable, and, it's no great shakes for you trying to do with it there as well. we will check back for you soon. the rabbi at the tree of life synagogue believe it or not, on another issue, is receiving hate mail. for what? for welcoming the president's visit to pittsburgh. i had it, we examine how those

opposed to this hate may actually be stoking it. stay here.

>> when i first said that the president was welcome, i received a lot of emails, too numerous to count and what saddens me as those emails also contain hate. it just continues in this vicious cycle, hate promulgating more hate promulgating more hate and that's not the solution. >> was rabbi myers of pittsburgh's free of life synagogue. the media is self-righteous leaf claiming to be fighting racism and semitism, but the only thing they seem fixated on is fighting the president. >> it's really unusual for a sitting president to head to the scene of a tragedy like this and not be in the company of other

elected officials. that just goes to show how controversial this last week has been, and the response was, he does care about he's not any good at it. >> it doesn't come naturally to him. >> laura: joining me to react to all of this is dave bossi, fox news contributor and coauthor of "toms enemies." and chris hahn, let's start with you. why is a visit to pay respects to the victims of this horrific anti-semitic slaughter over the weekend controversial? >> it's -- they want to make it so they hate this president more than they love the country. i've been saying it a long time. in this time, and i hope -- i think that chris will agree with me. we have a responsibility to try

to ratchet down the partisanship, not ratcheted up. the president as all presidents do went to the scene of a tragedy to try to pay his respects with the first lady, with his with his son-in-law who is jewish and his daughter who is jewish to pay respects to those fallen first responders that were incredibly brave going after the active shooter in their families. that's what presidents do. that's what should happen and that -- we should all take a moment just to take a deep breath. >> laura: chris hahn, on the 2,000 protesters, some of them organized, and the daily mail has a big long piece on it tonight by the democrats for socialist america. and other left-wing groups. and that's fine, they can protest the president. but this is what anna navarro said earlier today. >> the reason he's being faulted is because everything he has

said before hand and everything he has said sense makes this act seem like he is checking off a box and just rings hollow. >> laura: chris, is the president checking off a box? >> i don't know what's in the president's heart. i think every president should visit scenes like this. i know they were concerned about security and protecting the funerals from other people because they were worried about a copycat. so it was debated and i think that will pass shortly. what needs to be done by the president, and i agree, we need to racket down the rhetoric in this country. the president needs to choose his words more carefully. he can't be saying he is a nationalist. on the grandson of people that were chased out of europe by a nationalist. so there are better words to use for the love of your country, like patriot or love of my

country. but using that word has really set a tone that many in this country have their back up and are angered by the president. i think the president should you choose his words more carefully and try to unite the nation. i hope that the day after the election the president of the united states looks into the country and says it's time for the nation to have healing. >> laura: is that what nancy pelosi is planning to do? i take what you say and i know you feel that in your heart and i respect that. but the idea that in a midterm election, the president should just kind of sit there and say, well this is my view on immigration, this is the chart we have here and this is the gdp. come on. the left will hit him with everything they have had from the very beginning. the idea that he can't argue anything at this point because they've had a horrific tragedy

as is very convenient for the left. >> know that's not what i'm saying at all. i'm -- >> i think the president could run on his accomplishments and make comparisons to his opponents but he's got to catch a hateful rhetoric. read this book on nationalism, is a renowned jewish scholar. my great grandfather was killed by a nationalist, murdered by a nationalist. >> chris, i want to say that the president's heart is filled with love for all the american people, and i just have to say this. his grandchildren are jewish. this is something that's very close to home to him. i know the left wants to hate on him and i know he wants to argue with everything, but can they not just give him one moment to

pay respects to the 11 that died in pittsburgh? that is what america historically has always done. i know we just need to check ourselves and do that some more. >> i'm not faulting him for going there but like i said, there are other words. there are people in this country who -- shouting doesn't make it any better. i get it, but we have freaks in all walks of life and in in the country, and he wants the best for the country. and i think the democrats want the best for the country. but you can't -- he's beating

people -- >> he stopped using that word. there are others. >> laura: if he does that then i'm sure chrissy will be all in chomsky camp. the speech police are back again as i referenced in the stronger they are this time. >> listen. i think nationalism is a dog whistle for white nationalism. >> laura: monica chris kelly is here next to explain how this is something we all need to think a little bit about. don't go away. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients

come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management.

>> laura: here is the left's really cool game. if you disagree with the policy or phrase from the president and then you describe a really nasty qualifier to describe it. watch. >> it's a new dog whistle. it's a new welfare queen in cadillac.

>> i think nationalism is a dog whistle for white nationalism. >> when he's in the biggest trouble, the biggest dog whistle he blows as the immigration dog whistle. >> president trump: if this other guy is a stone cold, and my opinion, he's a thief. look at the job he's done as the mayor of tallahassee, he's a total disaster. >> book, but is a racial dog whistle. simple. >> laura: how do you call cats? it's always the dog whistle, you have to have new phrases to really trust the president. joining me from new york city, monica crowley. what's the end goal for the left ear? >> you know laura, this was george orwell's dire warning coming to pass on that's not an overstatement. the founders made the amendment protecting free speech, the first one, for a reason. you can't have a truly free society if free speech is infringed or circumscribed ciry the president which the first amendment was designed to

guard against or by these roving mobs of leftists that control the media and the narrative. they use fear, intimidation, extortion, blacklisting, boycotts and so many other manipulative ways as hammers against anybody whose speech they disapprove of. it is a form of totalitarianism, and if we don't watch out we will end up like europe where free speech is essentially out the window. >> laura: monica, it always ends up boiling over. they tried to do this even with the issue of abortion. the supreme court comes in and finds a right in the constitution that's not there, roe vs. wade. 45 years later we are still debating roe vs. wade, with hundreds of thousands of people. people are trying to say it's a choice but then others say your euphemistic language doesn't work with me. you can't take issues off the table, the supreme court couldn't do with role, and folks

out there trying to foist this on society at large, i don't think it works. it just ends up reading more resentment. >> they are trying to turn the entire country into the college campus and what they are essentially doing by using all these instruments of extortion and boycotts and so on is enforced speech codes. and they haven't really had enormous success so far unfortunately, in marginalizing, if not outright silencing people. i was at the store the other day and the cash he recognized me and she said, monica, i keep my mouth closed. i'd rather not say anything then getting into trouble with my boss or lose my job. that is a victory against the first amendment and it's very dangerous for the future of the country. >> laura: and we see it in the military and we see it and big corporations, people are afraid to speak out and speak their mind.

do it respectfully but speak their mind. folks, we are celebrating an anniversary tonight, our own. the ingram angle turned one today. is that the program still adorable? just a headache, we will celebrate the big one on ones from the past year. today... back pain can't win. now introducing aleve back and muscle pain. only aleve targets tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. aleve back & muscle. all day strong. all day long.

>> laura: the first of our best of year one series begins tonight with some of the most consequential interviews today. enjoy. >> are you having fun in this job? >> i love it. there's been a lot of false reporting that i'm angry about things. >> laura: i've never seen you angry. i've known you for 14 years. >> i think a lot of the media is fake. >> laura: you're like a distinguished older statement and you are doing videos we are putting up the finger to the

president and saying f this. if trump is rooted, where you why are you doing the same thing back? >> criticizing this administrations immigration policy. a communist regime overseas, but trump is the threat? >> i think we have american foreign policy on the right track on each of the dimensions that you are describing and when we get it right. when we ultimately see the end result from president trump's efforts i think you will see many of these things in a place that america has not seen. >> laura: i've had the great privilege of knowing kavanaugh for 25 years. this can happen to him i tremble for this country and this process and for any man or woman who find themselves up for a big job who didn't spend his or her teenage years in a convent or a monastery. >> laura: do you intend to use this issue on the campaign trail for the last four weeks, and what are you going to say about

it? >> i'm going to remind everybody of the importance of the senate. a record for the first two years. these are lifetime appointments. >> laura: on the inside for people who don't know about it. >> it is a good place to work. you can disagree with this opinion or that, but i'm not a person to say it is a sour place or it's a dour place or -- it's atmosphere. it is a wonderful place to work. >> laura: what do you pray for? >> i pray for world peace. i pray for our society that seems to be so broken right now and against itself. i pray for my family, i pray for my son and all the fallen. >> he wasn't in the game, he didn't do drugs. >> laura: the word nationalism has taken on, for the left, this

connotation of fueling anti-semitism, hate, even violence. do you think that is fair, and do you want to further clarify what nationalism means to you? >> to me i don't want to clarify. it means i love the country. it means i'm fighting for the country. >> hang on one second. i will be right there. i'm literally walking into the next studio. this is how close i am to you. >> laura: make sure the lighting is really shadowy, he's a shadowy figure. >> laura: oh, my goodness. at one year, i can't believe it. coming up next, surprise and a celebration you don't want to miss.. >> tech vo: this teacher always puts her students first. >> student: i did mine on volcanoes. >> teacher: you did?! oh, i can't wait to read it. >> tech vo: so when she had auto glass damage... she chose safelite. with safelite, she could see exactly when we'd be there.

>> teacher: you must be pascal. >> tech: yes ma'am. >> tech vo: saving her time... [honk, honk] >> kids: bye! >> tech vo: ...so she can save the science project. >> kids: whoa! >> kids vo: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪

>> laura: one year anniversary of "the ingraham angle." just had a baby. our entire staff, debbie who is not here.

alexis, all of our great camera people. what is this, like the academy awards? everybody. raymond. >> the spirit of following, i'm going to cut the cake. >> i do have to say, so many people have been tweeting. they wanted me to thank you on the first anniversary and congrats. >> laura: thanks. thanks, everybody. see you tomorrow. shannon bream's one-year anniversary as well. we have cake for shannon bream and the "fox news @ night" team. congrats. >> shannon: congrats. you as well. it's good to be in it together. it feels like this year has flown by. it's been a busy one. >> laura: a lot has happened, that's for sure. >> shannon: congrats to you guys. we began with a fox news alert. with a caravan of migrants approaching the u.s. border, president trump sets his sights on birthright citizenship in just the latest move on immigration days before the midterm election. we will examine the potential legal battle and the