supreme court. we want to hear from you. our question of the day, do you think the democratic policies are hurting the american dream? hannity.com, let not your heart be troubled because laura ingraham is up next. >> laura: hannity villain of the day. i have to come up with my own. i think it was probably the mri machine. can i talk about me for a second? wait i want to talk about me. i was in an mri machine today. i have an ankle issue, a stress fracture from running. i'm in the mri machine and the guy is arranging the foot, don't move for 40 minutes, i was so tired, that i fell asleep. he had to wake me up, even with that sound it makes. >> sean: listen i'm too cloth claustrophobic. >> laura: i had love mri's, the only time i get to go to sleep. >> sean: a moment of peace,

happiness. >> laura: that is a sad sad existence. great show the tonight. thanks so much. >> sean: prices of being apparent. >> laura: i'm laura ingraham, this is the "ingraham angle" from washington tonight. fresh off a plea of not guilty as his arraignment today, roger stone will be here to respond to his critics and discuss his next steps. will he cooperate? and frank luntz has done hundreds of them but he says his latest focus group included one of the nastiest exchanges he has ever witnessed. is that hyperbole coming from frank? i don't think so, you'll see the video. do the democrats have any idea how damaging their newest stars might be to their longevity as a party? governor mike huckabee is here with the reaction to the latest shocking revelations about one of theory members. but first, kamala's big condition. that's the focus of tonight's angle. con. well that didn't take long. the democrats newest it girl of

income redistribution, kamala harris is already taking big heat from liberal big wigs, we'll play it for you in a moment. why on earth would they pick on someone as brilliant at senator harris? you support the medicare for all bill right. >> i believe it will totally eliminate private insurance, for people out there who like their insurance, they don't get to keep it? well listen, the idea is that everyone gets access to medical care. and you don't have to go through the process of going through an insurance company, having them give you approval, going through the paperwork, all of the delay that may require. who of us has not had that situation where you have to wait for an approval and the doctor says i don't know if your insurance company is going to cover this? let's eliminate all of. that let's move on. >> laura: sounds so simple, let's move on. wasn't that michelle obama? any way the coffee guy is now

saying, not so fast that's not correct. that's not american. what's next? what industry are we going to abolish next? that alone would wipe out millions of jobs of americans. and that is the kind of extreme policy that is not a policy that i agree with you. if you take immigration, healthcare, what we have is streams on both sides not representing the large majority of americans who don't have a voice. >> laura: now schultz is a businessman, and he certainly is no conservative, but he sees the writing on the wall here. he knows the democrat party is moving so far left, that it's leaving america. democrat dar listens like kamala harris are proposing disastrous socialist solutions to things like health inequality or wealth inequality. that was once left to late night seminars in college. forget the 500,000 insurance

company jobs that would be lost in the sanders, harris, warren plan of medicare for all. the fastest way to sink medicare is to give it to all not just to the elderly. it will go broke that much faster, maybe even in five years. soap even if you tax the rich to death, you still can't pay for medicare for all. doctors and hospitals would take pay cuts, they're already facing them today. that will means more hospitals closing, more doctors retiring or not going into the profession at all, longer waits for serious procedures and ultimately this will lead my friends to rationed care according to age, weight, and yes, other preexisting health problems. but don't worry, because when you wait in line for the procedure at least you will be comforted to know that the government is pursuing kamala's green energy fantasy i support a green new deal and i will tell you why. climate change is an existential threat to us and we have got to

deal with the reality of it. we have got to deal with the reality of the fact that there are people trying to peddle some idea that we should deny it and they're peddling science fiction in stand of relying on science fact. >> laura: so what does the green new deal mean for you and your family? well it means the government would reach in and control, monitor and tax even more aspects of your daily life than it does now. you love your car as much as i do? mine is 19 years old, i still love it. too bad. the green parties green new deal calls for replacing non-essential individual means of transport with high quality and modern mass transit. this is a geeky way of instituting a ban on cars. the who decides whether your car is a non-essential individual means of transport? maybe kamala and crew will bring back obama's green job scar, why not? to achieve the green utopia it will be necessary to elect identify everything else,

including transport. if you love your suv, sedan, hatchback, is too bad. only electric. if you were deemed worthy of owning a car at all, remember in kamala's gas free world the government gas bags have all the power. and even big gulp man, mike bloomberg is baulking at harris green folly i'm tired of listening at things that are pie in the sky that are never going to pass, never going to afford. i think it's disingenuous to promote those things, you have to do something that's practical. >> laura: that means banning all kohl's, cars, taxing water use, it would be all on the table, to force americans to bend to the trends of the socialist left. now more power for them, less power, freedom and prosperity for you. it's always how it works, in a

fully the centralized economy and this is what is lighting the democrat party on fire today? really? instead of being with the nrdc she should have consulted first with, i don't know, determine mitt it's not that easy being green♪. >> laura: well it's not because the kaiser family foundation found support for medicare drops like a rock when you know how much it's going to cost you. same thing with the green agenda. 56% of survey respondents initially said they favor medicare for all, when they're faced with the practice is pekts of paying higher taxes to fund the system and the elimination of private healthcare companies, support false to 32%, when told it could threaten the current medicare plan only 32% remained in favor. this is why it's so critical for

the trump administration, the entire cabinet and the republican party to have a full court press of facts out there to educate vulnerable voters on the green economy issues, medicare for all, all of it. history shows us, that socialist ideas are always easy to sell to uninformed in doctrine nated and sometimes desperate voters, but it's impossible to fully fund. it never works. it's a false promise of free stuff for ever. but as always you eventually run out of other people's money. kamala harris, i don't know, would do better pursuing maybe a career as a dj? a song that has to be played loud because you have to hear the base, the sun is shining by bob mahrley and the whalers. >> laura: maybe a backup singer? one nation, under a group, getting down just for the funk

of it. can i get it on the -- >> laura: i don't know, a voice over artist. [ laughter ] right? [ laughter ] [ laughter ] . >> laura: if you buy what she's selling, she may have the last laugh, but you're going to be crying all the way to the government owned bank. and that's the angle. . >> laura: here now to debate, alfredo ortiz president and ceo and adam green co. founder. adam is your name really green? green jobs, green economy, all of it will sounds good. single payer healthcare system though would cost about $32 trillion over ten years, green new deal another multi trillion, how are we paying for this thank you for playing one of my the favorite songs. that was great. let's be clear about the

progression of healthcare reform. protecting preexisting conditions which they're doing now. >> laura: let's focus. we get that. how are we paying for this? how are we paying for it? kamala dodged the question last night. she was asked, she's like it's a problem, she re-stated the problem which is a classic socialist thing to do. you don't like not getting coverage, terrible to fill out forms, isn't it? how do you pay for it yeah so what howard schultz said there he sees the writing on the wall. he does because elisabeth warren proposed a wealth tax on billionaires, people like him, that's why he and bloomberg are so scared. >> laura: that doesn't pay for it this actually pays for it. even a koch brothers survey says that. if you were paying $15 for parking your car in a lot and the government came along and said we're going to tax you $12 but then give you free parking, some might call that a $12 tax

increase but there's $3 more in your pocket every day. that is what medicare for all is, it's taking all of the bloat of billions of dollars of tieing, ceo pay, repetitive. >> laura: according to whom every study of medicare initiative costs versus private insurance, that's public record. >> laura: you know that medicare for all, we will wented up with another two tiered system where the rich people can go to whatever doctor they want, because doctors are going to opt out of this, right now the reimbursements are cut, cut, cut, they will be further cut. right now medicare only pays, we only pay about 30%, the average person, 30% of the cost of their healthcare under medicare. now you multiply that by x, to get medicare for all. i am not bad at math, i'm not great. but where are we getting the money for that alfredo?

is this a tantalizing idea? it sounds cool to people. medicare for all, yeah, go for it it's mean laura this is going to come from the pockets of the job creators, at the end it's an item that defines the idea of socialism. at the end of the day socialism, it takes, captain at that his many creates, that's why we see thousands of people coming from venezuela, nicaragua, mexico, coming to the united states fleeing socialism. there's not a venezuelan dream, there's only an american dream, that's about capitalism. >> laura: one of my producers said people in their 20's when they here this is like the -- that doesn't register to them. they don't have any life experience, i lived in the soviet union as a student. i had enormous, it changed the way i felt about a lot of things

in the government. i became really conservative when i was there. a lot of kids have no sense of it. when you talk about this and say it's going to put the country further into debt they say we're basically insolvent any way. it doesn't add up. republicans have to do a much better job selling this. what people react to, this is bernie sanders radio show in 2017, he had a canadian doctor on talking about wait times in canada we do have a problem with wait times for what we call elective or non-urgent procedures. non-urgent surgeries. the classic example being a hip or knee replacement how long will it take me? it depends on where you are in the country, sometimes a few months, sometimes a year, in some places sometimes it's been longer than that that people wait for a hip or knee replacement. i think that's totally unacceptable i appreciate you focussing on the math.

i'm surprised to hear alfredo talk about job creators paying the bill. >> laura: is that what you want in america? that's a red herring. >> laura: i know friends in canada coming here i know people who have insurance who wait a long time for a surgery. >> laura: thank you obama care, that was supposed to fix it all obama did that. right now job creators are absorbing a cost that other countries don't have to at absorb >> laura: do you think healthcare would be improved, better under medicare for all than it is today? you're switching the argument here. first americans would save mine that is a fact. small businesses, big businesses would not have to pay the marketing costs, ceo salaries, people he talks about, would win big i have to interrupt. >> laura: real quick look, we traveled tens of thousands of miles talking to hundreds of business owners.

what you're talking about is at best duplicitous, you guys talk about in the shutdown the shutdown, for example, hurting small businesses but on the other hand you're introducing a $15 minimum wage that is surely going to hurt small business owners why would a $15 minimum wage hurt small businesses? >> how many businesses do you own? i pay health insurance money that pays a ton on marketing. >> laura: you don't like the marketing, okay. up end the entire free market. there's a lot we could do to drive costs down, we have. he nailed how to bring healthcare cost down, eliminate some of the involvement in the insurance companies for small procedures, that's not a hard thing to do. on the green energy deal this is going to hurt the democrats and schultz is on to this. 7.2 million jobs could be

eliminated. 1.1 million in coal, oil, gas, 2.4 in motor vehicles and parts, 1.4 million military personnel if as oklahoma cortez and others have hinted out the military spending could be cut in half. they say you will create more jobs in a green economy. kids like that issue, that's it for them. she said that's the primary issue. that's aoc, i'm not dismissing her tens of millions of new jobs in this clean energy market. >> laura: if it's bur johning why do you need the government to step? just like it steps in to facilitate -- >> laura: if it's the thing, the free market, it's the thing, let it go no, other countries are improving their industries and we're not doing -- >> laura: we have the strongest gdp in the world, do you know

why? we don't follow necessarily what other countries do. our economy right now is the gold standard in the world. i have to go to victor davis hanson. we have to go t we could do this for an hour. we'll have you back. why does it seem by the way every time the democrats face a crisis their answer is the same? doesn't seem to be like maybe we could learn a little here? it is move further to the left. aside from bill clinton after the 94 midterm loss it has been the default response. this cost the democrats the white house in 72 and the current iteration is their most radical turn yet. here to explain victor davis hanson. you just heard the discussion. your thoughts? i mean socialism to the highly uninformed, even with the yellow vest protests in france, and even with the unrest in venezuela, the argument is they don't get it right. france doesn't get it right and

venezuela didn't get it right. but we here in the united states we're going to get the socialism thing right yeah i guess we're gonna turn everything over to the dmv and they could run things efficiently. that's the logic of equality of result. it gets more radical. it happened in ancient athens, france, each generation looks back at the prior radical generation and says you're old forking is and we're going to get more radical. there's not much more you can go when you outline the socialist agenda. you can't go much more to the left. why is it happening now? i think part of it is the democratic party is a party of the very wealthy, i'm not talking about very wealthy, i'm talking about levels of riches we've never seen before in silicon valley, wall street. it's primary left. the republicans learned that in the 2018 midterms.

they were swamped. and all of these candidates are very well funded. there was foundations, and research institutes that promote this agenda. republicans, you mentioned it, haven't offered very effective counter argument. and -- >> laura: victor people are going we hear this every night. this is going to hell in a hand basket, socialism is happening. what the hell do republicans do? you can't fund everything, the koch brothers are into the globalist things, they do blood things as well. if you had five people who are willing to put the money into the real education of these issues that they have with steier that they have with soros, they had with weinstein and others, there's a lot you could do. harvey weinstein powered tens of millions of dollars into left wing causes. he's out of the picture but they have a lot more behind them you have to start, the

educational system is turning out people that have no knowledge of history. these are not democrats of the 50s that are radicals of the 70s and 80's, these are socialists that are teaching our youth. we have to address structural changes. do not give money to universities unless it's targeted. get rid of tenure, let people with an academic degree teach high school kids with a master's degree, get rid of the school of education, get rid of tenure, we have to look at i who aren't we taxing these multi billion dollar en do you wants? we have to look at education, first of all. the republican party has been a silk stocking country club party that was wrong on trade and wrong on the middle class agenda that hallowed out the interior of the united states. they have to empower those people. the middle class is now republican. if you don't address their issues you have no counter argument against the very

wealthy and the very poor. we have to look at the borders. he have 65 million people who do not speak english as a primary language. the assimilation, integration, i want marriage melting pot that saved this country and made it unique in history is dying. we need to go back and make immigration, measured, diverse and go back to the melting pot. >> laura: assimilation now is considered racist. i mean when there is. >> sean: it is we saw that with tom brokaw. >> laura: when they're attacking tom brokaw, liberal lion, very liberal. he's a great person, great guy. he's a big liberal. when they throw him on the fire, i mean it's crazy town. this is nuts you're making the argument, laura. >> laura: we've got to go you're making the effective argument, where are the republicans making that argument? they're not. >> laura: i keep saying where is trump's cabinet?

other than mike pompeo, where are the cabinet members? frank luntz has a shocker of a focus group, socialism all the rage? looking good babe! are you filming? at booking.com, we can't guarantee you'll be any good at that water jet thingy... but we can guarantee the best price on a hotel, like this one. or any home, boat, treehouse, yurt, whatever. get the best price on homes, hotels and so much more. booking.com, booking.yeah

♪ ♪ >> if helping people is

socialism, then i'm for it. i think it will benefit our country in the future. >> socialism as a concept as a philosophy is good. i think it's got a bad represent trying to spread the wealth is definitely a good thing in america. >> laura: eventually you run out of other people's money. frank luntz has been in the polling business for decades. what do you think of the latest socialist fad you heard in our a block, frank, when people actually the find out it costs them money! that's when they say wait a second, maybe this green thing isn't so great. maybe medicare for all, hold your horses, stop the presses, maybe i'm learning something. what do you make of this? i can give you the statistics behind it. we polled 18 and 29 year olds, 58% of them, believe socialism is a better economic system than capitalism and only 34% chose

capitalism, remainder chose communism. a majority of young people believe in bernie sanders f. you go back 25 years there's only a third of young people do. they become more conservative over time? absolutely. we've never had a young generation who is more ideologically unattuned to what their parents and grandparents think. >> laura: that's because we never had universities quite this radical or a media quite this involved in the spreading of these untruths about the free market, et cetera, we have ce o's running for cover. these ce o's better get out there from under their desks and start defending this way of life in this country or they're going to find themselves running somewhere they can hide their money. i want to get the issue out. you're calling your latest focus group you said it was one of the ug ugliest scenes you've witnessed in your career.

tell me what we're looking at here tonight. let's play some of your focus group from hbo's vice news tonight. participants are cree acting to the border wall fight and the government shut down, let's watch nancy pelosi said, no, i'm going to call your shot. okay? the issue is, is nancy pelosi committing an act of treason by acting against the security of the united states? i say yes. and everybody wants to jump the fence, jump the fence and says oh i am calling for a soil lump. why don't you apply to your condition sol lat and do it the legal way. jumping fences my friend is not a proper way to enter any country we're talking about logistics of border security and not whether or not it is inherently nationalism and inherently racist. how is that racist? why is working on helping the people that are in america,

because we still have whether it's the vets or homeless, let's help them first. >> we help everybody no we don't. what he's saying, this economy can't survive it. any one person coming in is technically illegally invading the country. >> i don't think you can look me in the eye and say this is a national emergency. this is a national crisis, we finally have a president in office who is willing to stand up to this, and that's president trump. >> laura: frank there were charges of treason and racism. so why is this ongoing debate over the border wall shut down creating more passion than you've seen previously? it was actually much worse than that. >> laura: i see that and i'm like that's the worst you've ever seen? come to my house. that doesn't seem too bad to me frankie well frankie, i haven't heard that. that's the first time everyone has called me that on fox. >> laura: you have a beard, we have i have to do something, you're too cool for school, go

ahead i appreciate that. both hbo and vice news have been doing this for two years, showing the voice of the people. what you didn't see here is the yelling that happened. we had one woman that got up, took her microphone, slammed it to the ground and said i've had enough, i disagree. i had a jam who stood up who would not sit down, this is the first time i've had two participants that have threatened to leave and even the camera people thought they were going to have to get into the middle of it. i hope to bring that material to you in the next few days. what is happening is the combination of the shut down and border security and there is no common ground. that's what is causing this. people on the far left, people on the far right and the people in the center have tuned this thing out. the problem, laura, is that there aren't any politicians who are saying stop yelling, stop insulting, stop getting in people's faces and actually solve the problem. >> laura: well when you have

someone like joe biden say i work with republicans they're attacking him. they're attacking joe biden. this is again moving so far to the left, they've left america. they're attacking him. mitch mcconnell has conversations with the democrats, he wants to works with the democrats on anything from district court confirmations, and the democrats are going to resist completely. we want to the get the other video. we'll get that and talk about that more with you. thanks so much. i have a question, does the democrat party fully grasp, really grasp, the leadership these deeply fringed elements of some of their newest stars. congresswoman rashida tlaib, her ties to anti-semitic run deeper than previously known. tlaib is a member of the facebook group palestinian american congress, the group's

founder was a key fundraiser for tlaib. and in jan 2018 he shared an anti-semitic video that claimed jui jews aren't actually jewish and secretly control the media. here now former arkansas governor, mike huckabee. thanks so much for being here. two democrats now, governor, go in leadership positions, steny hoyer and hakeem jeffries have both defended their newest members against these charges. like tlaib and oh far against these charges one thing you can always see about the democrats, they will stay hitched to their wagon even if their wagon is headed off a cliff. the used to be the democrats were a more rear of israel and its independence and freedom and as a safe state for jewish people than republicans, that no

longer is the case. they have pretty much abandoned any real commitment and reliability to the freedom that exists in israel. and they've taken up with radical groups and people who are clearly and virtually unat poll jet clit anti-semitic. it's just stunning. it's a form of racism that's completely acceptable in our culture today. >> laura: congressman tlaib and omar they invariably go to you're anti-muslim, it's somehow xenophobic or racist or an iteration of one of those attacks. for people like us, who support israel, the state of israel, overwhelmingly in congress and the senate passed a resolution today with marco rubio's amendment, it's not a question. for this new generation of far left democrats, as we talked about earlier in the show, governor, everything is on the

table. you saw this coming a long time ago, you saw this coming 20 years ago. where are the republicans out there really supporting the president's agenda and exposing what this stuff is at its very co core? it's one of the reasons that republicans need to circle their own wagons around their principles and around their president. this is a president who has had some really gutsy split cal moves p it's not just moving the embassy but taking a strong stand recognizing israel's right to exist and the unity of the city of jury is lump, that may not seem bold but it is because he's the first president in my lifetime who has been as clear about it as anybody has ever been. it's resulted in a huge back lash from some of the radical left, the whole idea of boycott and sanctions has destroyed the hopes of a lot of pal less

citizeniance. i was in jew dee at a few years ago at a plant that employed 1100 people, 600 pal less tinniance, 500 jews, working side-by-side. the pal less tinniance got five times the amount of money working at that plant than they had in their lives. but it was shot down. 600 gainfully employed pal less tinniance lost their jobs and went back to abject poverty. what kind of the nonsense would anybody believe that will helps pal less citizeniance? it doesn't. it's that sort of thing that is a battle. and it has to be eliminated. >> laura: it has to be eliminated. the president needs more cover out there and more advocates for his agenda. have to expose this stuff for what it is. governor thank you for the job you do. as always. by the way, roger stone pled not guilty in a dc court today after being charged in the mueller investigati

investigation. he's going to join us to answer the question he has given, two competing answers on, will he cooperate with the mueller team? stay there.

♪ ♪ ♪ [ cheers ] [ cheers ] . >> laura: well that was the scene as long time trump associate roger stone left his arraignment this afternoon.

he pled not guilty to charges stemming from the muller probe, just five days sins his home was swarmed by fbi agents in a p predawn aid. roger stone joins us live. roger you've had a few busy days. on sunday you stole stephanopoulos that you would be open perhaps to cooperating with mueller. but just yesterday you seemed to change your tune, what's going on? which is it? i think my comments on abc may have been misconstrued. what i meant was i'm not going to bear false witness against anybody. i'm going to tell the lutheran under oath to the investigators if they have questions, subject obviously to the advice formatwise of my attorneys, but i'm not going to do what michael cohen has done. i'm not going to make up lies or bear false witness against donald trump or anyone else. the truth of the master is even though i'm accused of lying, when i get adam schiff on the

stand when i get eric swalwell on the stand and other members of that committee on the stand, i'll demonstrate that they are the ones who are lying, not me. >> laura: our old pal jerome corsi was on with martha maccallum earlier tonight and had a warning for you, watch yes they are extremely thorough, they have everything. roger shouldn't underestimate that every communication he had, telephone, email, who he met with in person, the mueller team has endless resources. so roger should go into this fully prepared understanding that he's not going to be able to dodge the evidence that i'm sure mueller has. >> laura: your reaction to thafrjts well, unfortunately dr. corsi has already said a couple things about me that are demonstrably not true. >> laura: like what that a memo he wrote meet regarding the podesta brothers lucrative business deal in russia based on published reports by the new york post and

breitbart was somehow a cover i story. for what? what would there be to cover up? my tweet the podesta brothers was not controversial for six weeks, dr. corsi said he told me that john podesta's emails had been stolen. on tucker carlson he said he told many people that. with not really a journalist he said he's told many people that. he never told me that. maybe he can say who else he told. he also said i new about the billy bush nb c tape in advance and i directed julian assange to move up or change the dumb of data to change that. whole cloth. i have text messages and emails and metta beta data that shows he's not telling the truth. >> laura: i know you said you've never deleted any emails you've ever had h any physical

documents have they been destroyed? no, absolutely not. it is true that i forgot i had text messages in an old cell phone that are entirely exculpatory that prove that randy cred co. was my source. >> laura: is that one of the false statements that you made yes that would be a false statement but the text messages prove that he is my source as to the significance in the october release date of the wikileaks material. >> laura: we talked about that on the radio at the time. there is any -- we all forget things but these are pretty given the nature of this investigation, might you have forgotten other things? to the extent that i made mistakes of memory, they would be without intent and inconsequential, they did not be material under the law. for any legal expert to look at these excerpts without reading four and-a-half hours of testimony to see the context, the questions before and the

questions after would be irresponsible, but you can watch cnn and see this indictment is a slam dunk, my attorneys don't think so. >> laura: a former fbi assistant director was talking about your only hope now, being a pardon, watch i'm a strong advocate of the theory that stone is positioning himself for a pardon and that it's likely the only hope he has. he seems driven and motivated, merely by absolute publicity, absolutely being in the center things, regardless of whether it's bad publicity or good publicity, he needs to be there and he seems to be shaded toward the negative. >> laura: is that it? your only path out according to these characters, on t.v.? you're appearing to talk to the president through our show to get a pardon i don't know many fbi acts who know about public relations or the law in many cases, the truth of the matter is if you

read my book stone's rules i believe when you're falsely accused and you say no comment or roger stone feels unavailable, most americans assume you're guilty. the purpose of the over the top raid on my house in which they sent in more men than were used to protect our compound in benghazi, which was used to paint the jury pool as me as public enemy number one. >> laura: it was a ridiculous thing and it was offensive to me, regardless of what goes down here, it was like elian gonzalez times 29 or 28, it was absurd. we have your friend over at msnbc, mika brezenski who was making a point about your claim that your dog was terrorized. how many dogs do you have? two yorkshire terriers. >> laura: they're a little yappy, i love them. but this is what she said stone's complaint that his dogs were terrorized is also a

tiny bit ironic because his seven count indictment includes the allegation that stone tried to intimidate someone by threatening their therapy doing. don't do that wow! number one, randy's dog is not registered in new york as a therapy doing. number two he wasn't feeding the dog perhaps because he was spending his money on other things and that was the context, once again you take something out of context and it has a different meaning. you can go to the daily caller and read the articles i've written about animal welfare and ending the inhuman medical testing on dogs and cats, i'm a dog lover. >> laura: i know this about roger. roger is a very pro animal person like i am. you can say dirty strike ters, are you going to do the nixon peace sign for every appearance not necessarily >> laura: t-shirts, buttons when i was arrested i was wearing my roger stone did nothing wrong t-shirt.

you can buy them at 1776 do the -- >> laura: alright. by the way, pompeo says that wikileaks is a non-state hostile intelligence service. why would you work with them? could i see the proof of that? where is the judicial decision that says that? i'm afraid our intelligence services have been politicized. john brennan says the same thing, i don't believe it to be true. it's a claim. it's never been proved in any us court of law. >> laura: you're talking about whether russia hacked? it's a talking point. unproven in a court of law and i don't believe it's true. i think julian assange is a journalist, he does the same thing that the new york times and washington post do. >> laura: roger we'll be watching. when is your next appearance? i actually will probably come on with tucker later in the week. >> laura: laura ingraham podcast . >> laura: i was trying to get you to say that. coming up it was the deadliest

shooting in u.s. history and nearly 16 months later the fbi says no clear motive. the only man who has ever interviewed stephen paddocks brother to tell us what the heck they're missing. we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. we're the tenney's and we're usaa members for life. call usaa to start saving on insurance today.

this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome. stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today.

♪ ♪ . >> laura: the shooting left 58

americans dead over 800 injured. and today after nearly 16 months of investigation the fbi has found no specific motive in that las vegas massacre carried out by stephen paddock. the question we have is the following: does the fbi oh victim's families and american citizens more than we don't know? we're joined by investigator jim bless low who is the only person to interview the brother. and brian claypool, jim you the interviewed paddock's brother. did the fbi ever interview you as a result of your interview of him? no. but they actually did interview bruce quite extensively. he was in los angeles and he actually got discovered because there were existing charges against him for possession of, what? child pornography, the same thing that was found on his

brother stephen's computer in the hotel room. they interviewed him for approximately a day. his reaction to this report? i got it from him today. he said there's no surprises to him in what's in this report as far as what the fbi is saying they believe motivated his brother. >> laura: brian you represent victims. their families. this has been just a horrific period for so many. so many lives lost. and when you look at the report, it's basically a lot of nothing. i mean no social media history to speak of. still don't know much about his wife, you know, travel overseas, to pakistan, there's been these theories out there about that. nothing came of it. what are your thoughts tonight? yeah laura, not only am i a victim of the shooting, i represent over 125 victims. i got a call yesterday from a woman in alaska, she's my client, her son was killed in the shooting.

she ironically said to me have you seen the fbi report? you know what i said? i said the fbi? i forgot they were even on this investigation. i mean what has the fbi done in 15 months? they have send out this three page report, and it doesn't address anything about how this shooting could have been prevented, laura. that's what victims want to know. and people across our country, how could we have prevented this? what can we do to make sure it doesn't happen again? 15 months later we have nothing. but we do have one thing that the fbi came up with, that's really helpful. they concluded, laura, that stephen paddock chose an optimal location for this shooting. he picked the 329th floor of the mandalay bay right across the street where there were unsuspecting and vulnerable victims. why is that important? it's going to be devastating to

mgm because it was foreseeable that this shooting could have taken place >> laura: yeah well again i think for americans watching this tonight, and we remember that night and how this all unfolded, i guess we want an answer. but there are things in life you just can't find an answer to. that is the case as well, things you can't explain. but in today's day and age with social media you would think you could track something. but it looks like not. and it's not satisfying. and i don't really know what we could do at this point. the fbi, this is what the report is. i read the whole report in about seven minutes. didn't give me satisfaction. guys, thanks so much, we'll be right back with the last bite. and i take trulicity once a week to activate my body to release it, like it's supposed to. trulicity is not insulin. it starts acting in my body from the first dose

and continues to work when i need it, 24/7. trulicity is an injection to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. don't use it as the first medicine to treat diabetes, or if you have type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, you're allergic to trulicity, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your low blood sugar risk. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and decreased appetite. these can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i choose once-weekly trulicity to activate my within. if you need help lowering your a1c, ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity.

..

>> laura: it's time for the "the last >> it is time for the last bite. a stressed-out kid has a math emergency. >> had a bad day at school? >> yes. i came to tell you that. >> what happened that you had a bad day? >> i have tons of homework. >> what subject do you have homeworking? >> mass, and it is so hard? >> the young boy got the help he needed from the dispatcher. hats off to you for knowing your fractions. the kid is a little lonely too.

important housekeeping note, a new podcast, new one dropped today, another one tomorrow. learn all about it, where we are today and where we are going, shannon bream and the fox news at 19, take it here. >> i consider all mass to be an emergency. >> i get nightmares when i even think of calculus or statistics, any of those classes i can't even think about it. >> down to 3.9. >> we begin with a fox news alert. apply for help from the venezuelan opposition's newly appointed top diplomat who says liberate as. that is what he's urging mike pence to do.