can curl up in the fetal position somewhere in a warm place and wait until it stops being hard and that just isn't reality. >> martha: he wasn't happy we cut that differently. there we go. you decide. that's "the story." we will see you tomorrow night, guys. >> welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." it's clear both of the country's political parties are have changed radically. they are changing still. we covered that every night on the show. donald trump is transformed the gop, you may have read about it. on the democratic side, there have been profound changes too. ones that don't get as much attention. party for hundred years stood with america's middle class now represents the nation's richest and poorest. the party position on policy have changed accordingly. a lot. this is about 20 years ago, democrats champion free speech. they worried about illegal immigration, loudly.

they criticized voluntary foreign wars and they argued unrestricted trade hurt american workers. by the way, quite a few of them, democrats were pro-life too. senator harry reid among them. that's not surprising. democrats said they cared most about the vulnerable in our society. even bill clinton who vetoed partial abortion ban he wanted to keep abortion rare. he said that a lot. try that in today's democratic party. they put it on t-shirts. abortion isn't bad. we need more of it. governor andrew cuomo signed a bill making that possible. it's called the reproductive health act. the law legalizes abortion right to the moment of birth for any reason. to most people, aborting a child moment before delivery might seem uncomfortably like killing.

it's a concern. cuomo's law addresses that concern. law declares children who have not been yet born are not in fact human. he described it is a profound moral victory. the national press didn't spend time covering this. there's still something pretty ghoulish about celebrating third-term abortion. that's why only tiny of percentage american voters support it. nobody really wants to hear the details about this. nobody asks. that's why the video we're about to show you, it is remarkable. in it a avoids democratic lawmaker called kathy trant, explained in detail a bill she's introduced that will remove all restriction on late-term

abortion. she was asked what would that mean and trans tells the truth. watch this. >> where it's obvious that a woman with to give birth, she's has physical sign about to give birth. would that still be point she can request an abortion if she was certified? she's dielating. >> mr. chairman,ing that would be a decision that the doctor, the physician and the woman -- >> i'm asking if your bill allows that. >> yes. >> tucker: so, abortion at the point of dilation. if you kuded -- accused what in mean, ask everyone who is giving birth. you maybe pro-choice, are you okay with that? virginia's governor is okay with that. he thought about it.

he's been in office little over a year. he's always described as moderate. that's pretty amazing given his reaction to kathy tran's abortion bill. >> it's done in cases where there maybe seer deformities. there maybe a fetus. in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, i can tell you exactly what would happen. the infant will be delivered. the infant will be kept comfortable. the infant will be resuscitated if that's what the mother and family desire. then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. >> a discussion about killing the infant? the infant. he's directing -- the infant will be delivered and resuscitated if that's what the mother desires. quote, in other words, the governor of virginia just told us in public on camera that it's okay to kill a child after the

child has been born. that used to be call infan infanticide. taking the life of a child who is breathing. the governor seem to say that. did he misspeak? you'd hope. he didn't. ralph northam is a physician. he's not some clueless layman who mangled a talking point. this is what he thinks. this is what his party thinks. no one ever says it, but it's true. this is the new moderate pro-choice position. you should know it. lisa int booth join us tonight. thanks thank you very much. this is one of the those trends that's escaped notice. there are bills in vermont and rhode island and probably bunch of other states to allow this. tell us what you found out about this legislation. >> reporter: it's pretty

terrifying. president clinton saying abortion should be legal and rare. now you have people like governor ralph northam who openly advocated infanticide. democrats embracing abortion up until the moment of birth. what i think is so interesting about this, democrats are now embracing this position that is wildly out of touch with the majority of americans. you look at morist poll done in january, only 75% abortion and below. the reason being because you look at abortion at the third trimester, you're talking about injecting a baby that it viable at this point outside of the mother's womb in the head, torso or heart and forcing this child into a full cardiac arrest, the

mother going to carry this dead child in her womb for two to three days. that is why you have the majority of americans that have oppose this kind of thing. >> tucker: it's just so interesting this is happening. it's coordinated by abortion providers who are major donors to democratic party. it's happening the same moment a the party is working itself into frenzy about moral concern about people in our country illegally and climate change. the message this is a party that really cares. here you have a sitting democratic governor saying, you get to kill the kid, the child if you want. has anybody said like this on the democratic side? >> reporter: i have not heard much from the left except >> andrew cuomo. when esigned the reproductive act. a wall is moral but this is

moral? i think that democratics need to check themselves. they are so wildly out of sync with the american people. remember hillary clinton supported repealing the hyde act which is decades-old law that will allow funding for abortion. democrats becoming way out of sync with americans. i think republicans should raise the alarm. get loud and so should president trump. democrats are out sync with americans. >> tucker: seems that way. thank you very much. monica klein joins us. i'm sure you describe yourself as pro choice. lot of people think of themselves as pro choice. i'm not attacking you for that. i wonder what you think what drf virginia said. the child is an infant is born, there's a point where the mother and the physician can decide

whether to kill the infanttor not. what do you think of that? >> i understand you want to go back to a time where roe v. wade was legal and they were using coat hangers to have abortions. >> tucker: i'm giving you time to make a real argument. i'm not arguing for the repeal of roe v. wade. >> that's what you're essentially saying. >> tucker: please don't be tiresome. the governor of virginia who's a rising star in the democratic party, just said this. there's pending legislation that mirrors it. i'm asking what you think of it. >> i think that right now, reproductive healthcare is under attack by the republican party. 72% of americans support right to choose. we have trump and kavanaugh trying to retake away our bodies. this isn't about babies. this is about you attempting to chrome women's bodies. >> tucker: don't be a robot. this is the governor of

virginia. i want to know what you think of it. does that bother you? >> it bothers me that are attempting to control women's bodies. you are. the republican party right now is working overtime to repeal roe v. wade. >> tucker: i wonder if you're unwillingness to address what just happened today on tape is sign you can't defend this. i wonder why that it. >> as on woman, what do i think it? have you ask yourself why you spend so much time thinking about this. there are seven states there's only one abortion clinic. this is about a woman's right to choose. you as a man should not have a

single say in that. >> tucker: wow. do you think that you're making a case that most people agree with? that it's okay to abort a child in the third trimester. >> you can keep trying to say that the democratic party is hurting children. your party is tearing families apart at the border and allowing children to die in federal custody. who's party is harming children? >> tucker: let me ask you one quick question. i think less of you after what i have to say. it's an honest question. have you thought about it. do you have a real answer to what the governor of virginia said or you will throw yet another talking point at me? have you thought about it? >> i have thought about it. i'm telling you that your party is attempting to change the conversation about roe v. wade and take control.

as a man what you're focused is on controlling women's body. >> tucker: this is a child who's been born, it's not a woman's body, an independent person. >> you have concerns over children when you're fine with i.c.e. tearing families apart and children dying. >> tucker: monica, thank you. new york governor andrew cuomo identifies as a catholic. he just described the law he sign and celebrated. >> what they think you should do with your body, they want to dictate through the law. if you said what issue is more important to you now, choice or taxes, choice or economic development. i don't know what people would say. >> we have an extreme conservative agenda in washington, kavanaugh is going to reverse roe v. wade.

i have no doubt. this is democracy. new yorkers want to protect a woman's right to choose. >> tucker: father john morris is a catholic priest in new york. he joins us tonight. father morris thank you very much for coming on. >> i'm sad tonight. >> tucker: i'm too. i think it's a complicated issue. i certainly know lot of people who disagree with me on it. you think you live in country where when he says when a child is born you have right to kill that child. there will be a chorus people saying, no, you don't. you don't have right to kill people. there isn't that chorus. i wonder why? >> your last guest, i think gave us the most convincing explanation. they don't want to take on the issue. you showed a video earlier about

governor of virginia, this is a pediatrician. who says, this is what's going to happen. if women is diallated and about to give birth, we'll make sure -- i don't think you brought it out -- we'll make sure the baby is comfortable and then, we will resuscitate the baby if the mother wants us to. first we'll make it comfortable. then we'll resuscitate it if the mother wants us to. then we'll into discussion about what to do next. this is not a crazy activist group. this is the governor of virginia. it's exactly what the governor of new york thinks right now. that's what we're dealing with. the world has gone crazy.

>> tucker: i know the catholic is an institution. i'm not a catholic. the catholic church from my understanding, is totally opposed to this. yet, it offers communion to politicians who support and abet and increase the incidents of it. >> catholic church would say anybody who agree with this including governor cuomo and anybody else, they should not receive champion beyond themselves. -- communion themselves. most evangelicals most christians, noncatholic christians would say what is ex-communication. it has to do with saying you're no longer part of the communion of the church. if i believe in this crazy stuff, i'm in the in communion with the catholic church. i should not even be going to

communion. the catholic church has to decide, are we going to publicly say, you are now ex-communicated. if that's going to be a helpful for the soul of that person, let's go for it. does that make sense? >> tucker: what's the case that you would make? lot of people have internettized the libertarian argument and it's your body and you can do what you want. i understand the argument. what's your response to that? >> well, i'm glad you brought that up. your previous guest said, this has to do with the woman's body. in the example that she just been given, the baby had already been born. the umbilical chord has been cut. is that still her body? it doesn't make sense logically. i think it doesn't make sense even when the baby is inside the

body. any mother who has a baby kicking her in the stomach and moving, knows that's another human being. tucker, one really important thing that nobody has been talking about in the new york state, what they've also done is they've got rid of and all other state laws the idea that there's personhood of the unborn. they have said that we're going to get rid of the status of person of the unborn. let's say a woman is beat up and she's eight months pregnant. up until now, that child -- that would have been murder of the child as well. that's no longer the case according to this. >> tucker: no it's not. let's call it what it is. this is a death cult obviously. >> it has to do with the love of death. >> tucker: father morris thank

you. i think people should know this. well, the new agenda on the left has lot of free stuff. some of it for noncitizens. the free stuck for americans most people are for, after the break. i'm a veteran

and the army taught me a lot about commitment. which i apply to my life and my work. at comcast we're commited to delivering the best experience possible, by being on time everytime. and if we are ever late, we'll give you a automatic twenty dollar credit. my name is antonio and i'm a technician at comcast. we're working to make things simple, easy and awesome. >> tucker: democratic party supports expanding the american well stair state. free healthcare, free college tuition and other free things. the case they make is this is a rich country and the welfare state is popular.

they are right. it is popular. look at polling. there's been a change, traditionally the welfare state was for a country's own citizens. today's democrats are fighting hard to expand iter those in this country illegally. for noncitizens shouldn't be here. in new york lawmakers passed a bill to provide testimony financ--taxpayer finance tuitioo illegal immigrants. nicole thank you very much for coming on. in a state like yours where there's a lot of poverty and a lot of homelessness and broken infrastructure, how can lawmakers justify giving free things to people who don't have a right to be here in the first place? >> that's outrageous. if you're a family house old income $81,000 you qualify for no tuition assistance. this bill would allow

individuals who are here illegally and residing in the state of new york for just 30 days, they take the ged they qualify for tuition assistance program that so many legal residents who are struggling to get by on average $40,000 in debt after college, they aren't receiving it. >> tucker: so, the message is really clear from lawmakers to the citizenry and population. we don't care about you. your interests irrelevant to us. are people getting that message? >> yes. it's a slap if the -- in the face. new yorkers are learning with the shift to the state senate and democracy starting to do. the property tax gone up 44% in the last five years. we seen mayor give free healthcare to individuals here illegally. 300,000 of them we have 76,000 homeless here in

the city of new york. >> tucker: has there been any backlash? france is paralyzed from middle class backlash against policies like this. are you sighing anybody say, this isn't tolerable. >> absolutely. i hear it all the time in the legislature. i love the debate against the dream act which is tuition assistance bill. now this year we saw it pass because the democrats tookover the state senate. people want to leave this state because they can't afford to live here. we're not benefiting from salt of the the city and state high taxation. they continue to tax us more and middle class isn't receiving the same benefits. i think that's what's really frustrating for those that i represent and people across the state of new york.

>> tucker: tax you more it pay for people who are have no right to be here in the first place. it couldn't be clear. have fun in florida. thank you very much. inauguration speech california governor gavin newsom, he spoke like -- watch this. >> let's build a house stronger than the coming storms, that's open to the world. house that provides shelter to all who need it and sanctuary to who seek it. we will not is one house for the rich and one for the poor or one for the native had-born and the rest. we'll build one house for one california. >> tucker: maybe the fakest person in american politics. he wants to use $20 million of taxpayer funds to create an immigration rapid response team that would aid migrants arriving

in california's border. i don't know if you will stay this. i think there's a huge level of public support for safety net. public wants it and all the polling shows it. why not respond to american citizens with the following bargain. yes we'll raise taxes on some people and give you more what you want, ewith will to american citizens because that's our job. we're not going to tax the middle class for pay for people who shouldn't be here. why not make that deal? >> well, in this specific instance, tucker, he is protecting them. this $20 million you're talking about, he is helping american citizens. we have a crises at our border. it's affecting our border

community. it's because of the failure in washington d.c. to get around to addressing the issue. this $20 million out of $140 million state budget, the fifth biggest economy is to help with a crises on the ground people in need. >> tucker: okay. that's one way to describe it. i would describe it differently. let me broaden the conversation. there's programs in california that shovel taxpayer money into the pocket of non-citizens. if you're not a u.s. citizen, you can't benefit from taxpayer dollars. the point of u.s. government to look after its own citizens of all nationalities, and races. all american citizens and nobody else. why not put that on the ballot. why not do that? >> well, long time ago when this was more republican state it

didn't pass and it was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge. we can't do that. >> tucker: explain to me, we both agreed, we elect the government, we give portion of salary to government. they can look out for us. one judge didn't like it. bring it to supreme court. make the case for it. what's the case against it? what's the case you should take my money and give it to somebody that's not allowed to be here in the first place? >> we're also taking their money. they're working in our economy. they're contributing to california's economy. they're paying taxes. they're contributing to our economy. >> that's not true. they're working for tyson chicken. they're working for some big employer that wants to pay people less. i understand why they're doing it. they aren't working for me.

i'm an american citizen. why am i paying for somebody who shouldn't be here? i don't get it. >> they are paying. they paid the sales tax and property taxes. they are renting facilities to reside in. they are buying food. they're working and when they're working, they are paying the employment taxes. they are contributing. >> tucker: we have an ox t oblin to send them work? >> who are you sending money? >> tucker: i'm sending money to the state and federal government. which rechannels it. not to the middle class. they go to people who shouldn't be here. family making $81,000 combined is not eligible for tuition assistance but illegal alien is. that tell you everything. >> i can't speak to new york but

california has generous programs to help people in the middle class in this state to attend schools. there was just a deal announced with our brand new governor who is doing tremendous job so actually hold tuition steady. they're not going to raise tuition in this state. >> tucker: what if we took care of our people, the citizen? we balanced our budget and we have a surplus and no more debt, maybe we can hand some out to other countries. wouldn't that be good place to start? >> these are our people now. they have resided here since the reagan amnesty. absolutely. i have talking to this guy, his family came right after the reagan amnesty and contributed to our economy. his children are u.s. citizens. >> tucker: his kids qualify. they are equal as you and me. they are american citizens. if you're not a u.s. citizen, why you're taking benefits we're

paying for? >> again, contributing to our economy. they are part -- their entire family is part of our community. if we have specific issues with cartels and gangs -- >> tucker: we have people poverty and homelessness of our people that we're ignoring so we can help people who shouldn't be here >> we're not ignoring that in california. >> tucker: thank you very much. good tosee you. devin nunez join us after the break.

from the very beginning ... it was always our singular focus, a distinct determination. to do whatever it takes, use every possible resource, to fight cancer. and never lose sight of the patients we're fighting for.

our cancer treatment specialists share the same vision. experts from all over the world, working closely together to deliver truly personalized cancer care. specialists focused on treating cancer. using advanced technologies. and more precise treatments than before. working as hard as we can- doing all that we can- for everyone who walks through our doors. this is cancer treatment centers of america comprehensive cancer care network. and these are the specialists we're proud to call our own. treating cancer is more than our mission. it's our passion. expert medicine works here. learn more at cancercenter.com. cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now.

>> tucker: evidence continues to come up that the fbi maybe political in investigation of the trump campaign.

they met with christopher steele. now more than two years, it is come out that or shared intel from the steele dossier of the fbi. congressman devin nunez on the intelligence community. thank you very much. >> great to be with you. >> tucker: this is very complex, we haven't covered every single night what does this tell us? >> it tells us, the definitely the fbi knew that the information was coming from the clinton campaign, the dirt, the trump dossier you said. that was coming from the clinton campaign, they lied to the fisa court. we know that for sure. >> tucker: we would know a lot more if the spying authorization from the fisa court remain

public. he was stopped by his attorneys. do you think he'll overright their judgment. >> what recommended to my friend and colleagues they need some transparency office. the government gotten so big, you got so many different agencies that there needs to be someone in the white house where the president of the united states, who's the boss, can make that decision and make it quickly. this is two years. we should have known about this a year ago. >> tucker: we saw on friday morning, roger stone, the alleged crime of lying, was surrounded by armed fbi agents automatic rifles and arrested. it reminded all of us that lying to federal agents is a crime. lot of lying in congress. in order for those liars to be prosecuted, they need to be referred to the d.o.j. by the congress. is that going to happen.

>> we're going it make several referrals. don't forget, w. the frustrating things, chuck grassley actually made referral on christopher steele. the british agent who worked for the clinton campaign. he was referred, nothing happening to him. i think until there's a new ag that gets in there and starts to clean this place up, i think it's going to be tough for the american people to have confidence in what's happening. >> tucker: i agree with that. why? am i missing something? chuck grassley -- >> i was the chairman of the judiciary. quite clear christopher steele wasn't telling the truth. lot of people think just because republicans out of power we are not conducting an investigation. we are still are.

whether or not people will come in and interview with us, we don't have gavels or the subpoena power. we will still trying to interview people and we will still be making criminal referrals. >> tucker: thank you very much. well, a television actor was hospitalized if chicago. he was victim of a racist attack. we don't have all the evidence. some politicians weighed in immediately describing it as a modern day lynching. police this chicago trying to find out more about what happened. >> reporter: chicago police tells fox news, they pulled hundreds of hours of surveillance video in the area where this alleged attack happen. nothing shows the alleged assault. what chicago police do say, they have identified two persons of interest on this surveillance video.

they plan on releasing photos some time soon. chicago police addressing media reports that smollett suffered a fractured rib. police tells fox news, they do not center documentation of the actor suffering a fractured rib. the rib could have happened. they can't confirm the injury. what they have confirmed, based on the digital footprint, they did visit a subway restaurant and when interviews interviewed him, he did have a small white rope around his neck. the attack that could amount to a hate crime sparked lot of support and response from politicians. kamala harris tweeted out in, this was an attempted modern day lynching, no one should have to fear for their life because of sexual assaultty or colo -- sexy and color of their skin.

democratic congresswoman from chicago bobby rush released a statement, writing, this is a hate crime. i'm more disturbed by which the crime was carried out. this actor is a musician. he has a scheduled performance in west hollywood this weekend which he apparently will carry on with. >> tucker: matt finn. thank you for that. appreciate it. up next, exclusively on this program, the border patrol made one of the largest drug busts in history. fentanyl killed 50 million people. there's no crisis on the border. just remember that. we have facts after the break.

>> tucker: u.s. border patrol made the biggest fentanyl bust in history enormous amount fentanyl to kill 57 million people. that's more than combined population of the states of illinois, new york and

pennsylvania. >> reporter: we got our hands on an internal memo that details this bust. the biggest fentanyl bust in u.s. history. four days ago in arizona, officers stopped a tractor-trailer crossing the u.s.-mexico border into the u.s. enough fentanyl to kill 57 million people. that's plenty of fatal dose to wipe out the entire populations of texas, arizona and new york state combined. they found this under the floor of the trailer. they found 114 kilograms of fentanyl. just two milligrams is considered a lethal dose. they grabbed 179-grammings of methamphetamine. the street value for fentanyl over $102 million. the officers arrested the smuggler, mexican national who attempted to drive the drugs

across the border. the suspect was a part of the trusted traveler program called fast. that stands for free and secure trade. the program started after 9/11. it's kind of like t.s.a. precheck but for truck drivers, they can complete background checks to get expedited screening. they plan to announce all of this in a press conference tomorrow and have a photo op. >> tucker: amazing story. thank you very much for that report. there's an awful lot of outrage in this country. we like to keep track of it because it's interesting. people are outraged about virtually everything, sometimes they get creative about getting outraged. here's one interesting example. restaurant patron in phoenix, arizona, recently complained to management about a photograph that was hanging in the

restaurant of coal miners drinking after work. coal miners were in black face and it was offensive and taken down. what you make of this? thank you very much for coming on. what does this story tell us? >> it tells that race grievance is throughout the country. i'm upset as a civil rights person we spend so much time concerned about a picture hanging of white men in coal dust. somehow that's offensive. it deflects away from critical issues facing black america. we have more blacks killing other blacks in one year than we did in the 70 years of lynchings. there's 9/11 every six years

blacks killing blacks. >> tucker: is it possible -- let's say you're charge of a big city and your policies weren't helping at all. may be it you would encourage people to be mad about things so they wouldn't be mad at you for mismanaging their lives. >> that's true. many of those killings are occurring in cities run by black democrats over the past 40 years. if politics and race were the issue, the question is, why not blacks succeeding? if we look at a time when whites were at their worse, blacks at their best. in between 1920 and 1940 the education gap in the south was three years, five years for blacks, eight years for whites within 20 years, we closed that gap within six months.

because we established schools, 5000 schools ceo of sears partnered with booker t. washington. he invested $4 million. the black community matched that and built 5000 rosenwall schools. there were five high schools in every major city. baltimore, new york, atlanta where the class sizes were 50 and plus we had tattered school books, buildings were torn down. the test scores of those blacks in those high schools, exceeded all of the test scores of whites in those same cities. even though we were spending less. the issue we ought to be talking about is why -- we ought to be black resilience. how did we achieve in the face

of over oppression, legal segregation and why are we failing now post civil rights. >> tucker: no one seems to care about the system. thank you for that. china is clearly the top cyber threat to this country. what can be done about that? senator marco rubio of florida he has a plan for that. he join us to explain. you should be mad at forced camaraderie. and you should be mad at tech that makes things worse. but you're not mad, because you have e*trade, who's tech makes life easier by automatically adding technical patterns on charts and helping you understand what they mean. don't get mad. get e*trade's simplified technical analysis.

♪ ♪ . >> tucker: official washington has spent more than two here is in utter hysteria over the threat that mass don'tian facebook users might pose to democracy. take a deep breath and ask yourself who is the threat to the united states? is russia? of course not. when actual experts on the subject testify they always say the same thing china is the top threat to the united states. dan coats testified as much to congress this much. senator marco rubio says he has a plan to combat chinese spying on the united states. thank you for coming o summarize for our viewers quickly what senator coats said at this hearing well they all agreed that

china is the most comprehensive intelligence directive the united states has faced. because it's a commercial threat, they steal your products and sell them at lower prices, so they can put our businesses out. steal our research from universities and they do that by packing in and stealing it, sometimes they hire the researcher and have them bring the research with them. sometimes they invest students in our system. they take that information and steal it back with them. they steal of course our military secrets. they also are in the supply chain. they're embedded in parts of our communication system. for example, they make a router or surveillance camera and can embed them into our system. even with congress they feel in business and defense and it's an enormous threat. >> tucker: it's terrifying, what do we do about it we have to admit it exists. for a long time china was viewed

as a benign threat. the conventional wisdom in washington was don't worry about china, they're a developing country. once they become like us, as rich as we are, then they will become just like us. it hasn't worked out that way. at least people have woken up. you see things happening. the justice department going after woway, in canada, every day you see more and more of this happening. now you're starting to see other countries doing it poland. numerous countries taking the threats seriously. woway, there's so much more to do. we still struggle with academia, i can't tell you how many universities i've talked to in florida that say they are used as agents to shape the narrative. to identify americans, and 20 years from now could be a mayor, a congressman, leader of a major corporation and start to sort of recruit them for the chinese. how many schools fought us on

that? we've gotten them kicked out of almost every school but one in florida. more universities of waking up to that threat. it's an ee morm mouse challenge to convince them it's a threat. >> tucker: almost every last one of these schools rely on tax dollars, either through guaranteed student loans or directly through grants to operate, doesn't the congress have leverage on this question? we do, and eventually it may get to that point. we're hoping through the defensive briefings, we and been hosting these closed meetings with leader s of business and the press. walking through the threat that will china poses. the business community saw china as a huge market, they many wanted to sell things and make things cheap in. now i think people are starting to wake up to this threat. we have a long ways to go. >> tucker: my last question, is it a partisan question?

are there senators on the other side, democrats who understand the threat and are willing to address it in the straight forward way that you are? yeah, absolutely. mark warner is the vice-chair man of intelligence. he's a leader in this. we haven't turned this one into a partisan issue yet and that's a good thing. the challenge comes from the pro corporate, i'm pro business, but not to the expense of national security. some idea that ultimately open trade, more commerce and engagement, selling or making things over there is more important than our national security. that's where i think it's more embedded. that's changing but we have challeng challenges. >> tucker: thank you for that. sent or rubio, appreciate it thanks a lot. >> tucker: well, we are out of time. what a roller coaster of a show! it's pretty unbelievable but it always is. what an unbelievable moment. pay close attention and learn

something. the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group think. hopefully cheer approximately any. good night from washington. sean hannity is live for us in new york. >> sean: tucker, great show is always, great to see you. incredible news night. not all of it great. if you value human life, children, babies, inalienable rights, basic human decency, i want you to listen up, we now have people in this country, democrats, people on the left, you know those people that claim to have a monopoly, compassion, they label conservatives as racist, sexist, heartless, hateful, they want dirty air and water and they want to throw granny over the cliff. we hear that every two, four years. as we speak we have in this country multiple states, legislators, governors that are pushing to make