something. the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group think. hopefully cheer approximately any. good night from washington. sean hannity is live for us in new york. >> sean: tucker, great show is always, great to see you. incredible news night. not all of it great. if you value human life, children, babies, inalienable rights, basic human decency, i want you to listen up, we now have people in this country, democrats, people on the left, you know those people that claim to have a monopoly, compassion, they label conservatives as racist, sexist, heartless, hateful, they want dirty air and water and they want to throw granny over the cliff. we hear that every two, four years. as we speak we have in this country multiple states, legislators, governors that are pushing to make abortion, this

is not about abortion, in the 7th, 8th, even the 9th month, up until the moment of birth, pregnancy. legal. they're trying to legalize, in other words, in fan at that side or the destruction of viable human life. they want to make it perfectly okay to in fact terminate a baby that could easily survive outside of the womb. kathy tran introduced a bill that would allow an abortion during birth, dilation, even when the mothers life is not at risk. watch her body language, this exchange closely. >> how late in the third trimester could a physician perform an abortion if he indicated it would impair the mental health of the women. i'm talking about the mental health through the third trimester. the third trimester goes all the way up to 40 weeks. >> she has physical signs she's

about to give birth, would that it be a point she could at republican request an abortion if she was so certified? she's dilating? mr. chairman, that would be a, you know, a decision that the doctor, the physician and the woman would make. >> i understand that. i'm asking if your bill allows that? my bill would allow that, yes. >> sean: even she doesn't feel comfortable with this. now we don't cover the topic of abortion, most people pretty much have made up their minds. we know roe v wade is law. there's a misconception whenever we have a supreme court appointment, roe v wade is going to be overturned and abortion outlawed and it's going to be back alley abortions. no, if the law was overturned it would go back to the states and we know how liberal these states are. it's a device sieve top tick. i will say this, on the issue of

abortion, people that i know that are friends of mine, you can have an honest disagreement about when life begins. the it's not that simple for some people. that's not what this is b this has nothing to do really about with abortion. this is about a grotesque brutality. this legalizes infan tic ide. this bill applies to all situations. she was describing when the birth began, that she would support an abortion. if the mother so decided. we're not talking about if the mother's life is at risk or whether or not a perfectly healthy child is formed inside the womb. listen to virginia's ralph northam. supporting what she said and worse third trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of obviously the mother, with the content of the physicians,

more than one physician, by the way. and it's done in cases where there may be severe deformities, a fetus that is non-viable. so in this particular example if a mother is in labor, i can tell you exactly what would happen. the infant would be delivered. the infant would be kept comfortable. the infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and family desired and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. >> we're going to go over this slowly. this is barbaric, horrible, it's about abreu brutality, the in the fact would be delivered, kept comfortable. meaning a human being is at i have loo, kept comfortable. then the infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother chooses to do if the baby stops breathing because they're keeping the baby comfortable and the family desired. while this family is living outside the womb alone they'll

have a discussion, it would ensue between the physicians and the mother, what should we do? what do you think we should do? really? you don't think that's cold, callous, barbaric? it's not about, you know, people can have a difference of opinion. i believe life begins at conception. if it's not viable first trimester, some people support pro abortion or pro choice as they call themselves. this governor worked as a pediatric neurology and he's willing to terminate a viable living child in front of him and have a discussion. this is a radical, new, extreme, as i've been saying, democratic, socialist party. at that point, you know, think about infants. think about how you feel about a little puppy being born. think about a little child? does that not represent everything that we think of as the ultimate in innocence? if we as a country, we can't

come together, forget republican, democrat, conservative, liberal, blue, red and agree do protect a child that is laying there comfortably, and having a discussion to do everything we can to keep that child alive, what kind of country do we want to be here? a baby defines innocence. what he described and she described is abreu at that time. and earlier today we sent sara carter to virginia to see what they thought about their governor and this horrible legislation women i think we all no we're responsible for our bodies, late term abortion is very scary. it sounds awful. i think abortion should be rare. but i think a woman has to make up their mind, and her doctor. >> a baby at full term until yes. oh. i don't think that's -- that's too much. yeah. >> for me, personally, doesn't bother me. that doesn't mean i would

advocate for it. i just think it's something that the people involved have to deal with themselves. it's their decision to make does it justice disturb you the fact that the discussion over a baby's life after birth what the governor suggested whether or not they decide to resuscitate would be left up to the mother? even after the child is delivered? just because you haven't taken a birth in this earth doesn't make him more or less a baby. >> do you feel like children are voiceless now? babies? i think they decide who is a child and who is not, right? they're putting god in their hands, instead of god's hands. >> sean: thankfully this bill was defeated late this afternoon in the virginia general assembly. it was killed in committee on a party line vote. all democrats voting in favor, and of course the governor supported it as well, as we showed you. as we move forward, other similar bills, why is this the big agenda of the democrats?

rhode island? new mexico, massachusetts, when they pass the similar law in new york the governor recently celebrated the passage of a comparable bill that makes late term abortion even into the 9th month legal, he shrugged off any criticism. he's not here to legislate religion. apparently he's only in the state house to legalize what is now a viable human life in the 9th month. they're purposely vague in their legislation. they won't give you a definition of health. if someone says hours before i'm having emotional second thought and the doctor says okay, they're allowed to commit infan tic ide. this party, these people who lecture about compassion don't seem compassionate at all. that includes kamala harris, and she's standing by her radical plan to eliminate the insurance industry. she's flipping and flopping and flailing all over the place but

it would kick 177 million americans off their own private healthcare plan and medicare for all would provide one big government mandated healthcare system. no options. and according to a study from george mason university, the plan is going to cost the taxpayers $3.2 trillion a year. 32 trillion, plus, dollars over ten years. how are you going to pay for that? that's about all the money we take in as a country t spoiler alert. kamerschak is coming for your crumbs. we the sent lawrence jones to see what they thought about her radical big government agenda and ripping away the free market healthcare system in america what about education? she believes free college, free pre-k who wouldn't want that, okay? i just want to know where the money is coming from.

>> how are you going to offer prehealthcare? who is going to pay for it that's the number one question. who is going to pay for it? >> sean: if we could take everyone's money and have the government spread it around. radical, extreme, socialist, democratic party, it's never been like this. kamala harris is trying to win over the radical elements in her own party while attempting to paint herself as a compassionate champion for the people. she's not the only one. elisabeth warren, after you paid your state, federal, property and sales taxes and maybe saved a little, she wants a new plan that would allow the government to go back again and steal money legally, from whatever you have left, a brand new wealth tax she calls t then when you die they take 40% more, in new york another 10%. that's $0.50 of every dollar you saved throughout your life.

one live long democrat is speaking out against his party's radical shift. howard schultz slammed warren and the extremists in her party for their attack on what he calls the american dream. maybe there is hope for the extreme radical party, take a look ee liz weather warren's proposal is a relating tax oh god. it's an idea that has no merit. she knows there's no way that could come to pass. these are just false campaign promises to make noise. >> i don't believe what elisabeth warren stands for. i don't believe the country should be heading to socialism. elisabeth warren doesn't know me. i started from nothing. i'm self made. isn't that the promise of america? regardless of your station in life, or where you come from, you could be successful in this country? i think it's ludicrous, elisabeth warren a number of years ago knocked on my door and asked me for money when she was running for the senate. so it's somewhat duplicitous, isn't it?

what howard schultz is talking about, the hard left shift in the democratic party has been happening for a long time. they want government to control your bank accounts, businesses, health care, education, they want open borders and the life blood of our economy, they want to end all fossil fuel energy, in 12 years or the world ends according to congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez. at the same time they are celebrating abortion, if you want to call it that, even up to the moment of birth? now imagine that they care about child, parent separation, only when they can bludgeon president trump who solved the problem that existed in the obama years. but then again nancy pelosi won't meet with angel moms and dad's that permanent separation because an illegal immigrant killed their kid. today house democrat told the hill his party is entering new rounds of negotiations to oppose

funding the border wall. the bottom line is my position is no. they're unwilling to negotiate? i thought they cared about dreamers and daca. clearly the party of compassion doesn't care about those kids or the safety and security of our nation. they're standing for nothing except hating trump. let not your heart be troubled, i don't think this president is caving n he tweeted this, if the committee of democrats and republicans is not discussing or contemplating a wall or physical barrier, they are wasting their time. the president holds all the cards, he gets no deal, february 15th, i'll give you odds. i'm 99% certain that he will lawfully declare a national emergency or just send down the military and start building the wall with defense funds. now many of you in 2016 doubted that donald trump would govern as a conservative. i've known him well over two decades, and i put it on the line and i said he absolutely

will. and he has, hasn't he? he's going to find a way. he's tenacious, to get the money and build the wall. in the big picture, i don't care how he does it. i don't care where the money comes from, it's our money and it's an emergency. we seal the growing seriousness of this every day. we have three caravans heading this way, one 12,000 people. we had an ms13 gang member apprehended in rio grande where there's no wall. look at the video released from arizona. look at this, a three year old is being thrown across an outdated run down barrier by human something you letters no doubt encouraged to make the journey because our borders are porous. wall street journ until repo reporting something you letters are taking border crossers on ale dangerous journey through a wall free area where they risk

dehydration, hal nourish want and death. our borders are a huge crisis that has to be address. timothy ballard, sounding the alarm, fox news.com writes as a former dhs special agent on the border who fought section trafficking, i can say that the issue of the border wall should not be about power and partisan politics. human trafficking, abusing children, this is what reckless open border policies encourage. it's why the president are fighting so hard. what are chuck and nancy fighting for? anything? no, except hating trump. he's offering things they say they wanted. the president knows what is at stake. it's why he's been willing to change rat strategies to get the job done. tonight the left prefuses to acknowledge the serious safety and security issues at the border. the president should, will use his powers as the commander in chief.

i'm giving you odds he will do it himself. we have one important update to bring you from the hadn't hadn't watch. remember nellie ohr, she worked for fusion gps on hillary's bought and paid for dirty dossier, also married to bruce ohr, high ranking doj official? well today we learned that nellie over's primary role at fusion gps was to dig up dirt on all of donald trump's children for the clinton campaign. she even performed op research against melania trump, another pretty skufting example how the far left, deep state abusing power bureaucrats, how far they were willing to go to destroy donald trump to prevent him from being president and destroying his presidency from day one. here, sara carter and alley berth stuckey and tammy bruce.

let me go over these words. this is the governor on the radio today. well he says, if a mother is in labor, i can tell you exactly what would happen. the infant would be delivered, okay, the infant would be kept comfortable, be resuscitated outside the womb if that's what the mother and family it desired then a discussion with ensue sean you know my background. i was president of the national organization for women. my activism began on abortion rights in the 1980's, it is something that, and i think this issue as you said is not about being pro choice and not about abortion, is it? as a matter of fact --. >> sean: are you still pro choice by the way? i identify as that, indeed. and i can tell you that the -- >> sean: first three months exactly. 61% of americans who identify as pro choice agree it should be restricted to the first three months.

92% of goppers agree with that six out of ten democrats agree with just the first three months and 78% of independents, we are not a polarize did electorate. we're not polarize did as a nation in this regard. for me what is horrific, is that these kinds of laws posit this notion that women who are about to give birth are willing to kill their children. and this is what we've got to stand up against. only 13% of americans want third trimester abortions. 18% of democrats are for it. no one wants this. it is not what americans want. >> sean: tammy i disagree. no, this is being fought for, hard. and being passed as law in some, by people that claim the monopoly on compassion right. >> sean: your former friends certain democrat leadership. what we know now is they are not out of touch with the american

people, they are an at this time they sis of what we represent as individuals. whether you be pro choice or pro-life. you know what? this is a good opportunity for people to begin to have this conversation. it's a good opportunity for republicans and other pro choicers and pro-lifers who want to come together and recognize that wait a minute we have common ground on most of this. we can talk and have conversations about when life begins. but if you are as appalled at this as i am, maybe that conversation in the 21st century now, now that we know what the dynamic is, perhaps we can begin to have that conversation. i'm willing to have it because this has been a horrific realization of where the democratic party has gone and where people who would claim to be the recipients of the work that some of the people have done for 20 or 30 years. >> sean: for the cause to a point this is not my cause and

it's not been the cause of people in the 80's and 90s who were fighting for the opportunity of women to control that framework, when you find out you're pregnant, and i want women to have the option to say, yes, when they're pregnant, to have a good job, to have enough money, whether they're married or not. this is what we've been fighting for. >> sean: you went out on the streets of virginia, sara. what was the reaction of most people snrjts what happened was the fact that this video went public shocked the conscience of a lot of people i spoke to. they were willing to talk about it. i thought it was going to be difficult. people wanted their voices to be heard. they were disgusted by this, shocked by it. even pro choice people, like tammy explained. i think having the video out there was a real game changer. a lot of these policies and legislation gets talked about but it doesn't make the public media. it's not out there. so people really the don't have any idea of what is actually

going on inside the law, sean. what i heard was people that were shopped, people that were concerned, people that wanted more information. and thankfully the law did not pass. what we see with governor cuomo and his statements, this is not about religion, this is about the sanctity of life, about how man life. about a child sitting there, after its been born, and you can't debate that life, once it's there. i mean this is a person, a full person. i don't know how we got to a point where we no longer value the sanctity of life. and we no longer support or protect those that can't protect themselves. it's just very shocking. it was very upsetting. a lot of people were really -- some people were just so upset about it they didn't even know how to talk about it can i add one tiny thing sara? i don't think we are at that point. we cannot, at this point at all

agree and allow these individuals who are completely out of touch, to define what it is, where we're at and what we're settling in. >> sean: alley both. both right. there is no coincidence that the expansion of government and the socialism is happening at the same time that we're denigrating life inside the womb. the sanctity of life is central to a free republic. without life, liberty nor the pursuit of happiness can exist. this world we live in, did he know me grading the most vulnerable, helpless among us, it is no coincidence that socialism is becoming more popular, more mainstream. that's what happens when you grow the power of the government unfettered, human life is the cost we often pay. >> sean: you three, this is not about abortion. this is, the baby being born

comfortable and we'll have a discussion? the united states of america. this is -- we're better than. that thank you so much for being with us. all of you. when we come back straight ahead senat senator lindsey graham demanding answers. and lawrence jones went to california asking people what they think about kamala harris's radical policies. tonight's villain of the day? let's say a famous hollywood sell will he brit i. coming up straight ahead. celebrity. that gives powerful cold symptom relief without raising your blood pressure. infant at that side infant side i believe pant side.

instant side. infanticide. fanticide. infanticide. worker's compensation. >> mb. >> reporter:. >> announcer: womb woman womb. >> reporter:>> reporter:.report: >> reporter:.reportereporter:.r:

this isn't just any moving day. this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome. stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today. ♪ . >> sean: alright big news tonight out of capitol hill, senate judiciary chairman lindsey graham demanding answers on the fbi from the third

infamous raid, in this case roger stone's home in florida. why did the fbi send 27 agents armed with rifles, body armor to arrest stone for lying to congress? he's not el chapo. the senator wants to know if cnn was tipped off by the mueller team to get the exclusive footing of this raid. joining us with breaking news, senator lindsey graham thank you very much. >> sean: i don't think that was about abortion in the commonwealth of virginia right. >> sean: you once sponsored a bill that i agree with i have it right now. how many nations allow abortion on demand after 20 weeks, which is the fifth month? seven. seven nations in the entire world allow abortion on demand after 20 weeks. they're talking about abortion during the actual birthing. so my bill says, unless there's life of the mother is at stake, as a result of rape or incest

you can't have abortion on demand in the fifth month. i think most americans -- >> sean: you would have four months to decide most americans would be fine with that. >> sean: let me go to this letter, and i will be honest, i kind of expect and have expected more out of director wray. under james comey we have two criminal investigations ongoing, i think there should be far more. we hopefully will get to that. you have said you will get into this. talk about what should he do? why are we doing this to people for process crimes? why doesn't it happen to all the liberals like clapper, brennan, mills, abedin, all these people that have lied to congress? why not the pre dawn raid my job is to provide oversight to the department of justice. love the fbi, respect them, but somebody needs to watch those who watch us. i'm gonna tell you all i can about the fisa warrant and how

they used the unverified dossier paid for by a political party without any verification. >> sean: russian lies yeah, i want to know why to execute a search warrant with somebody who had a lawyer, the best way to get roger stone is to tell him, cnn wants to talk to you, he'll show up whenever you want him to show up. >> sean: ouch this seems to me over the top. i don't know what the message was, being sent. but i personally didn't like it. i've been a prosecutor, defense attorney, it seemed to be sending the wrong message. that if you cross mueller, look what's going to happen to you. mueller, do your job. but these tactics are unacceptable, given the level of threat here >> sean: i look at his team. he has a clinton foundation attorney, only democratic donors, no republican donors and the man who was excoriated for withho withholding exculpatory

evidence, tens of thousands of enron employees lost their job, he lost 9-0 in the supreme court. he's the lead guy if they're sending a message, i'm sending a message to them. you're accountable to the congress. we're going to find out >> sean: you will get to this? they better answer my letter, if i were them i would >> sean: we'll get to the bottom of identify sachlt somebody signed off on something they didn't verify put it this way. what if the rolls were reversed? what if the republican party hired a former british agent to go to russia to dig up dirt on hillary clinton and everything in the dossier was a bunch of bs, do you think that might be front page news everywhere all the time? >> sean: the grassley graham memos, bulk of information, that means they committed a fraud on a court and they never told the court. i have to get to immigration okay. >> sean: a lot of conservatives looked at donald trump, new york

businessman, donated to republicans and democrats, at one point was actually pro choice. he's pro-life now right. >> sean: he kept his promises on judges, taxes, regulations, energy, now he's trying to fight for the wall. i told people then he's going to govern as ale conservative. some doubted me. i think i've been proven right. and i would say now i'm 99% certain, either the defense department budget or emergency money is going to be used and he's rethe lentless and tenacious and changing strategy is not losing we're going to build the wall one way or the other. i just talked to the president ten minutes before i came on your show. >> sean: i know for a fact, it was in the green room $5.7 billion represents ten locations according to the department of homeland security that a barrier would make the most difference. it's a professionally designed plan. if you look it at the ten locations on the border where

the professionals say we need a barrier it adds up to 5.7 billion. ever democrat virtually has voted for 634 miles of fencing. when you ask people where the ten locations of 634 miles we need something up now, they gave us the location and the price tag is 5.7 billion. the president is not doing anything crazy. what's crazy is that they're fighting him after having voted the way they did in the past. >> sean: just in the obama, a few years ago yes. february 2018. >> sean: the president offered things democrats dreamed about let me tell you, here is the conversation. the president wants to work with democrats. he doesn't -- the shutdown is not the way to get a result. ed it because he had nobody to work with. democrats are over playing their hand. if you want tps reform and daca reform. you'll get it but you won't get it if he does it by himself. >> sean: i'm worried about your

republican colleagues i'm worried, too. if you don't stand by this president -- every president, bush, obama and trump sent troops to the border. what is unusual about that? nothing. what is the difference between sending a troop to secure the border and build a barrier while they're there? he has all the power to do this. to my republican colleagues, stand behind him. >> sean: exactly. it's good for the country if you don't, you're going to pay a price >> sean: good to see you turks for stopping by thank you. >> sean: we've sent lawrence jones to california. he's asking residents what they think about kamala harris's radical proposal. an exclusive the interview with our secretary of state mike pompeo. our hollywood villain of the day. see if you can figure it out, coming up.

♪ ♪ . >> sean: alright as i've been telling you about the democratic party they are now competing to be the most radical, the most extreme 2020 candidate. and senator kamala harris appears to be the early front runner. we decided to accepted our own lawrence jones out to california to see you what the residents in her home state think about her far left agenda. let's take a look kamala harris is running for president now. how do you all feel about it? i think it's awesome some of the positions she's taken, she believes there should be a single payer system, medicare for all. do you agree with that? of course i do, absolutely. >> how do we pay for that. just the way we've been paying for it all these years. >> we're not paying for it now. if everybody is on it, how do we pay for it through taxes? >> how are you going to offer free healthcare? who is going to pay for it? that's the number one question. >> how are you going to pay for it. i don't know, they can figure it out.

if every billionaire in this country took a million dollars out of their pocket. >> put it all on the billionaires. we should have single payer, med indicated for all how do you feel about it? >> that ain't going to work, not in the united states. >> what about the education system? college should be three, pre-k should be free who is paying for it all? >> what about education? she believes free college, free pre-k really, who wouldn't want that? i just want to know where the money is coming from. >> there should be free college and preschool, how do you feel about that. i agree. it is in europe. i work with international students, they get school for free in their countries, they come here for opportunity. >> how are we going to pay for that here? it's in someone's pockets, so why not share laf will have. >> do you think she's a great opponent to challenge him. yes, i do. >> why? i like her policies. i think you know that it's time for a woman.

>> you like her policies, even though you just told me they weren't practical. i did. the idea. >> but it's not practical. but you still like her i still like her. >> thank you. fox news contributor, lawrence -- you're laughing at your own package, i love. that lawrence jones and monica crowley. lawrence why are you laughing? you think the answers are funny well this is just crazy. we don't think what she is saying is practical, but we like what she's saying but she can never get it passed so we're just going for vote for her any way. this is how unreasonable the democrats are. they are so caught up in their feelings that they don't think practically about issues, and this is why they're not gonna win. i would caution people, take kamerschak seriously. there is a group of people out here that is going to vote for her radical alexander jen da even if they know it's not practical as you just saw in the

package. >> kamala harris, they look at the cost of this, ten years, 32 plus trillion dollars. that's 3.2 trillion with a t with a t. >> a year. that's almost all the money we take it all the money in the world, sean. i have a column coming tomorrow in the washington times where i argued that the democratic presidential candidates of 2020 of when senator harris is one have learned nothing from the 2016 election. number one they have no idea what it is to run against donald trump. but number two, they're now operating. >> sean: waiting for the nicknames to start throwing out they're coming. but they're also operating in the context of the democratic party which is now barack obama's party. this is no longer the party of bill clinton, jimmy cart they are t this is radical left and they're running to the far left, because that's where activism are. >> sean: keep your doctor, keep

your plan, save money. millions lost their doctors and their plans and only have one option in their county or city and everybody paid at least double. so now she's gonna take 177 million americans, private insurance away. you will have no choice remember after she said that, her campaign backtracked. but then today she backtracked from the backtracked. but lawrence is talking to people that don't care about how any of this will be paid for. they think money grows on trees or it will come like mana from heaven. they don't understand nor do they care we warned people back during obama care days that this would happen. this was just saying for a single payer system they were going to get rid of the private insurance sector and made fun of us, they said we were overreacting when they talked about the death panels they said we're over reacting. and now we see presidential

candidates running in 2020 saying they're going to back this stuff. >> sean: they're talking about 70% income tax rates. the bottom 50% wage earners only pay 2% of the income tax bill. 20% pays over 90%. what are those 20% of people going to do with their money? they're going to leave. they're not going to pay 90% they will leave the country just like in high tax states you're seeing this massive exodus to states like illinois, new york, connecticut, california, they're going to the low income tax states. florida, texas, nevada. this is going to happen on a national scale. but the point is, they don't care how any of this works. this is all i'dology and redistribution. >> sean: lawrence don't bring that nonsense to my state, texas. we have enough liberals living hearing, that's how beto almost

got elected. >> sean: if you're going to move to a state that has no state income taxes, don't bring it with you. great job lawrence, thank you. great job monica. exclusive the interview with the president's top diplomat. what is president trump going to do in venezuela? what's happening with north korea and more, and maybe you'll guess tonight's villain of the day, famous hollywood sell will he where i celebrity, rate away.

♪ ♪ . >> sean: alright so much happening around the globe. joining us now secretary of state mike pompeo, always good to see you and thank you for joining us good to be with you. thank you sean, thanks for having me on tonight. >> sean: here is venezuela with one of the largest oil revefshs in the world. 80% hyper inflation, poverty,

bare necessities, chaos, two presidents at once, if you will. what is the situation and obviously your position, the president's position is very important here so the president had a chance to speak with president way doe today, the quest for freedom is on. the venezuelan people made it clear that they demand he not be the president and the president of the united states is here to support freedom and democracy. this was a once wealthy nation with ee morm now national resources. we have a humanitarian challenge, this is a man made catastrophe and we're intent about helping the venezuelian people correct it. >> sean: there's stock about a second summit with kim jong-un. it's amazing to me, no more rockets happening, being fired over japan, threatening the entire region and the united

states. hostages have been returned, the remains of american soldiers have been returned and dee nucle nuclearration talks return. what do you foresee another summit? sean i think we'll have a summit at the end of the month. that's the plan. that's what they've agreed to and we've agreed to as well. we'll do it some place in asia. so i think that looks good. i am dispatching a team there, headed that way for an additional step toward the path for not only dee nuke saying of the peninsula but a brighter future and security in a way no previous administration has been able to achieve. president trump was able to convince chairman kim that it's time for my team and all of the united states government to work and deliver on our commitment to end it in the peninsula.

he's told us he's prepared. >> sean: as the former director of the ci a, i would argue that intelligence gathering is more of an art than a science, although some things are certain. as relates to intelligence, interpretations of iranian capabilities, you have the president and prime minister netanyahu maybe disagreeing with the intelligence reports. i would chalk that up to interpretation but i'm guessing. what do you say? yeah i think that's right. i don't think there's much dispute. having had a chance to be the director of the ci a, i think the intelligence supports that iran is a risk. they have the capability to enrich nuclear material, they have increasing capacities to continue to work towards improving their missile program. it was just last week they attempted to launch a space launch vehicle which certainly

would help them deliver on their missile program. these are all components that lead us to a place where they could have a system that threatens america. president trump has made clear we're not going to tolerate it. we have a set of policies in place to prevent that. >> sean: last question about syria, afghanistan, american troops. some members of congress and members in the senate have disagreement. is there a solution and what is the real status of isis? is it did he go graded to the point where it's not anywhere near the threat it once was? well the president will make a significant announcement i think in the state of the union next week with respect to the status of the caliphate, the real estate, the grounds from which isis had been operating when this administration came in. you remember prisoners in cages, people kneeling on the beaches

and being beheaded. this was tragic. we also know in spite of enormous progress and success that the threat from radical islamic terrorism is well. we have to make sure there's not a re-injury genes of isis. this administration is committed to that. president trump has made clear it is a priority for him. and as the secretary of state i can promise the american people we will continue to do all we can to keep them safe from this threat. >> sean: one thing i always remembered in the 9/11 commission report they were at war with us, we weren't at war with them. and we know that those radicals are out there and what their goals are. mr. secretary, thanks for spending time with us. we appreciate it. when we come back, you won't believe, you will not believe the villain of the day, and some of your emails, straight ahead. moving? that's harder now because of psoriatic arthritis. but you're still moved by moments like this.

don't let psoriatic arthritis take them away. taltz reduces joint pain and stiffness and helps stop the progression of joint damage. for people with moderate to severe psoriasis, 90% saw significant improvement. taltz even gives you a chance at completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms, or received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. for all the things that move you. ask your doctor about taltz.

>> sean: love that animation. the hollywood liberal far left singer cher wrote "the most dangerous threat to american safety is the russian operative who occupies the white house. there is a special building in the afterlife for putin's water boy." losing it. time for viewer mail. we asked you do you think democratic policies are hurting the american dream? joe replies they're not hurting the american dream. they are destroying it. they have no clue what everyday americans want, just what keeps them in power." there won't be an american with these democratic policies. will be bankrupt financially and morally, like in the case of "why in all of the states to evolve a sudden abortion up to the moment of birth for, big issue?" on top of confiscating pretty

much everything and stealing your choice that having health care. they are pro-choice except kamala harris would take away your choice in health care. we are not the hate-trump media. we will be fair and balanced. tweet us your question. hannity.com. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham. >> laura: do you know when "i got you babe" was released? and who rotate? >> sean: i know that i am the bridge between two generations at fox. i'm the older guy. i've been here since day one. but i'm not that old and i don't care. >> laura: it was iconic. they say our love won't pay the rent. once the next line? >> sean: i have no clue. do you think i listen to cher? do you think i listen to that? >> laura: it's iconic. "before it's earned, our money has all been spent." how do not know this?