Skip to main content

tv   Life Liberty Levin  FOX News  March 16, 2019 4:00pm-5:01pm PDT

4:00 pm
a lot of times when we are walking our dogs we hold the back they want to have fun and they love it. jon: he used to and guides in 2014 to run the boston marathon to raise money for guide dogs. that is "fox report weekend" i am jon scott. see you tomorrow.
4:01 pm
4:02 pm
. >> let's talk about freedom of the press do you stand for freedom of the press? . >> i will say unequivocably i am a believer of the first amendment. it has no strength or real value if there is not accountability. so when people on the other side say i'm trying to chill speech but i am trying to seek redress from false attacks.
4:03 pm
false speech has no value. in this case you're talking about threat and and vilified a child and i am accused of killing that kind of speech? i am happy to take that up proudly we don't need that speech that is not what the first amendment is all about. >> but with reporters when the constitution was established freedom of press met the federal government was hands-off but there is still power on the states they can bring defamation suits. >> correct. >> with the ability to have false attacks on your reputation it was governor not
4:04 pm
exclusively to state law through 1964 "the new york times" versus sullivan the supreme court brought in the first amendment with cases involving public officials in those cases actual malice standard applied but in the remainder is still governed by state law which generally allows you if the reporting was false and negligent under "the new york times" standard you have to prove you actually knew it was false and subjective and that you acted with reckless disregard. that was expanded by some bright media lawyers into people public figures a few years later but then they applied it with rosenblum to metro media supreme court shortly after that realize
4:05 pm
they had gone too far so they dialed that back and reversed rosenberg and said it was only to a private figure if they voluntarily injected himself into the vortex of a public controversy for gone not sure where the actual malice standard came from with public officials with its roots in the first amendment that justice thomas himself commented and questioning the validity of that. so they need breathing room with the first amendment to adopt a mob attack on a 16 -year-old child the first amendment does not require
4:06 pm
that to be an effective protection. mark: we had freedom of the press long before "new york times" versus sullivan. >> we did. mark: all forms of communicatio communication, newspapers were developed, so the media broadly speaking really had a revolution in communications prior to "new york times" versus sullivan. are we better off if they claim immunity from the law so they can basically say anything or call people names may be? maybe not for freedom of the press is that a healthy way for a nation to communicate?
4:07 pm
look around you and the deterioration the last several years i have watched this since the richer jewel case. it is hardly unhealthy. there is nothing valuable to the public discourse to tell rumor rumors, lies, accusations to be able to use the media and the first amendment that's what happened to nicholas. the only didn't who have an agenda was nicholas salmon for him to participate in the right to life march but it is a situation where it started off when you got to the internet with this new development to sit in the
4:08 pm
privacy of your home with a few strokes of your keyboard and anonymity send out segments to the world to worry - - ruin her reputation in seconds. and with social media all these people on twitter and facebook and they are anonymous without level of discussion now it has gotten worse and worse. look at most of the articles and sources say people close to but nobody is identified it used to be the media was very careful to use any type of confidential source back in the word word and bernstein days.
4:09 pm
and then to verify any information. and just like the internet users and social media users put out a lot of information without any attribution and to be accountable for lies. mark: i will ask you about your client in a moment but first cnn ultimately through time warner. >> big corporations in bc, comcast, msnbc. >> big corporation. >> what kind of info that will - - influences that have? been look at the coverage we have on cnn and msnbc. there is no objectivity. there is no fairness.
4:10 pm
it is an extension of political parties out to influence the public instead of informing the public. it used to be get it first and get it right now they throw out get it right now and they don't even worry about the source. i use the example that look at nicholas. all over our president trump they got them the best feed report that he directly told michael coleman to lie to congress then friday night mueller comes out and says it is inaccurate and not true. the media went to bed friday night with two black eyes woke up saturday morning and came
4:11 pm
out swinging again this time at a young boy because he had a make america great again cap they tried to punch him and beat him and attack him like a schoolyard bully in a makeup point because they did not bother to look into the allegations but relied on social media. that is why they just joined the social media mob. it's an extension ability of political parties but the social media model. that is beyond the wild wild west there is no accountability yet we have no control from a legal perspective for the type of conduct and speech seen on social media websites. but it needs to be done there has to be accountability. if we don't then deterioration will continue. mark: when we come back i will
4:12 pm
ask about your client and how he is doing and your fight with the washington post what your plans are and arguments are and the reaction of some of those targets of the litigation. ladies and gentlemen,, don't forget almost every week night watch me on levintv. go to blazetv/mark or call 844-levin-tv. we will be right back. steven could only imaginem 24hr to trenjoying a spicy taco.burn, now, his world explodes with flavor. nexium 24hr stops acid before it starts for all-day all-night protection. can you imagine 24-hours without heartburn?
4:13 pm
at outback, your steak & lobster wish is our command. steak & lobster is back by popular demand, starting at only $15.99. hurry in to outback! steak & lobster is only here for a limited time. but allstate actually helps you drive safely... with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that. now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? guys go through a lot to deal with shave irritation. so, we built the new gillette skinguard with a specialized guard designed to reduce it. because we believe all men deserve a razor just for them. the best a man can get. gillette.
4:14 pm
there areand the best.s... which egg tastes more farm-fresh and delicious? only eggland's best. with more vitamins d and e and 25% less saturated fat? only eggland's best. better taste, better nutrition, better eggs. you see clear skin. cosentyx can help people with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis find clear skin that can last. don't use if you're allergic to cosentyx. before starting, get checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur.
4:15 pm
tell your doctor about an infection or symptoms, if your inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, or if you've had a vaccine or plan to. serious allergic reactions may occur. how sexy are these elbows? ask your dermatologist about cosentyx.
4:16 pm
mark: let me ask you a question you have seen "the washington post" that is a major corporation. so you buy a newspaper that goes broke. you serve a total of $250 million it wasn't even an apology. >> it was an excuse. tell me about that.
4:17 pm
>> so that there is no misconception it was not a correction. it was not a retraction prickle there was no apology. if you look at what it did they were patting themselves on the back to say here is what we reported and it turned out later we were wrong and we said that so pat is on the back our reporting was accurate that is really what they said they almost want to take the position it's okay to lie about you accurately so that when the truth comes out tell it at that point in time but the problem is they have a journalistic responsibility and an ethical responsibility to not only publish the lies but a duty to investigate
4:18 pm
first. they put out the statements of this young boy repeat those accusations they have the responsibility to do an investigation to not publish that in the first place they didn't say one word about the failures. not even one word attempting to say or investigate. that a newspaper will acknowledge to be held accountable to sit up and do the right thing the only way we will get justice with "the washington post" would be in front of a jury you won't get it voluntarily the media is incapable of standing up to
4:19 pm
acknowledge their mistakes committing to the idea because they cannot imagine that. >> what about all the professors or prosecutors or whatever they are that they keep defending them as a protection of the first amendment but that's not true historically. and number two these are major corporations and it has an effect. cnn did one hell of a number on your client so i'm just wondering they are not the only one. >> the list is long. >> so what happens quick.
4:20 pm
>> cnn was more vicious in the direct attacks on nicholas than "the washington post". cnn goes into millions of individuals homes to broadcast into their homes. they really went after nicholas with the idea he was part of a mob attacking black hebrew israelites yelling racist slurs at the black hebrew israelites saying totally false that he was part of the group threatening them that they thought it would be a lynching. you have seen the tape for good if you took the time to look at the full context of what happened that day, nicholas did absolutely nothing wrong. he was the only adult in the room.
4:21 pm
that you have a situation where cnn could not resist the idea that a young boy with america - - make america great again hat so they went after him so they woke up on saturday morning cnn was online on twitter at 7:00 a.m. with that propaganda put out and then we will find out who that entity shortly but right away going after the shooting boy and they maintain for at least two days. why did they take one hour to look through the internet and find the truth and reported? but they did not do it. they were vicious. it was false. cnn will be sued next week in right behind that is "the washington post". mark: you are suing cnn on monday quick.
4:22 pm
>> monday is the present plan we have lawyers that are working hard double checking the footnotes. we filed our complaint and investigated it because we wanted to get it right. mark: you are suing them monday for how much quick. >> because of the way they went after nicholas so viciously with his reputational damage will be higher than it was against "the washington post" 200 million punitive damages it is designed to punish and to deter don't ever do this again the award should be at least what it was that the compensatory damage to his reputation that number will be higher.
4:23 pm
mark: again you are accused of chilling free speech but i want to reiterate what you said that is what they are doing we want to go back to the time with actually investigate and then report the news that what cnn did for my observation was a campaign to destroy his reputation over and over to bring in guest to talk about your client, then talk about experts to talk about your clients this is what cnn and others promoted. >> they did like they decided to turn over the airways to people who had the agenda and they are lying about what happened nicholas was collateral damage cnn is waging a war against the president. mark: we have more when we come back.
4:24 pm
let's see, aleve is proven better on pain than tylenol extra strength. and last longer with fewer pills. so why am i still thinking about this? i'll take aleve. aleve. proven better on pain. i'm missing out on our family outings because i can't find a bladder leakage product that fits. everything was too loose. but depend® fit-flex feels tailored to me. with a range of sizes for all body types. depend® fit-flex underwear is guaranteed to be your best fit.
4:25 pm
4:26 pm
depend® fit-flex underwear look limu. a civilian buying a new car.ug let's go. limu's right. liberty mutual can save you money by customizing your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. oh... yeah, i've been a customer for years. huh... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for psoriasis, 75% clearer skin is achievable, with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. for psoriatic arthritis, otezla is proven to reduce joint swelling, tenderness, and pain. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement
4:27 pm
for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ready to treat differently with a pill? otezla. show more of you. . >> live from america's news headquarters i am jon scott prickled the number of dead in the new zealand mosque attack is at 50 the police commissioner confirmed the news earlier today. thirty-six people remain in the hospital. it played out live on facebook as he stormed the two mosques in the city of christchurch
4:28 pm
the 28 -year-old has been charged one count of murder but more are expected he is due back in court next month to people taken into custody after the shooting have been released they don't believe either was involved in the attacks. wreaking havoc in the midwest the region has been overwhelmed by heavy rain and melting snow. crews are helping to rescue those who have trapped in their homes. it is blamed for at least one death. now back to "life, liberty & levin". mark: attorney for nicholas sandmann that freedom of the press and freedom of the speech so see if you agree with me but my attitude a
4:29 pm
justice system isn't suspended by the first amendment. you are not attacking freedom of the press or freedom of speech i am attacking false speech let the chips fall where they may. and they should be immune from being held responsible do i have that right quick. >> dead on the money. . >> this is not about a concern about the first amendment. this is a concern about how they make money. they use the first amendment that is how they make money they want to defend their wrongdoing by hiding to
4:30 pm
protect their money but at the end of the day it is universal. these are big companies with vast financial resources and have the ability to influence if you have enough influence what you get? you get power this isn't first amendment from their standpoint at all that is this the subterfuge that they use really it's about their ability to get power to influence people they send the messages to. $250million some say is ridiculously high but some said it was too low. but what i want to put out there to show that this is serious i might be too high or too low nobody has come on television to say i did not
4:31 pm
sue for enough. [laughter] i know at the end of the day the jury makes the decision based on the evidence i have to prove my case i just don't sue them and they write me a check doesn't work that way. remember the same big corporations that will be fighting me in nicholas, they have unlimited resources they get their lawyers unlimited budgets. go get them. under the guise to protect the first amendment really they just try to protect their pocketbooks and their influence. mark: do they have insurance. >> they do. and the thing for them is insurance is cheap you could buy huge policy limits for very little premium dollars because there are very few successful cases.
4:32 pm
so they have that protection on top of the first amendment protection they try to assert. if the jury wants to tell jeff at cnn stop it don't ever do this again and the only way we get your attention is to put a dollar figure that we will take out of your pocket to teach that lesson. what does that do? will you be bothered by $200 million that is walking around money. mark: under our system to behold irresponsible people accountable that does not violate freedom of the press it improves it. >> it is the heart and soul of the justice system. with the supreme court's case that says the right of the individual to seek redress or
4:33 pm
false attacks on his or her reputation is every bit as valuable of those rights granted to us under the constitution. >> ultimately what do we do in our lives than to build a reputation? so now they could come along in a false area of lies to destroy your life's work because following this idea of the guilty accusation the process is thrown out the window so the accusation is made your reputation is destroyed your life work is destroyed. what about nicholas? he hasn't even started.
4:34 pm
he will now go through his journey to build his life's accomplishments not only his own path, not the journey he would have taken that now that has been imposed on him by the false attacks made. i don't know what kind of dollar figure you put on that for the rest of his life it will impact his children and his children's children. mark: will said. - - well said. we will be right back that's what 24/7 means, sugar. kind of like how you get 24/7 access to licensed agents with geico. hmm? yeah, you just go online, or give them a call anytime. you don't say. yep. now what will it take to get 24/7 access to that lemon meringue pie? pie! pie's coming! that's what it takes, baby.
4:35 pm
geico®. great service from licensed agents, 24/7. metastatic breast cancer is relentless, but i'm relentless too. mbc doesn't take a day off, and neither will i. and i treat my mbc with everyday verzenio- the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. in fact, verzenio is a cdk4 & 6 inhibitor for postmenopausal women with hr+, her2- metastatic breast cancer, approved, with hormonal therapy, as an everyday treatment for a relentless disease. verzenio + an ai is proven to help women have significantly more time without disease progression, and more than half of women saw their tumors shrink vs an ai. diarrhea is common, may be severe, and may cause dehydration or infection. before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection. verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. serious liver problems can occur. symptoms may include tiredness, loss of appetite, stomach pain,
4:36 pm
and bleeding or bruising more easily than normal. blood clots that can lead to death have also occurred. talk to your doctor right away if you notice pain or swelling in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain or rapid breathing or heart rate. tell your doctor if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include nausea, infections, low red and white blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. i'm relentless. and my doctor and i choose to treat my metastatic breast cancer with verzenio. be relentless. ask your doctor about everyday verzenio. ♪ ♪ it's taking over ♪ there's no escape ♪ you better get moving ♪ ready or not ♪ it's about to go down here it comes now ♪ ♪ get ready ♪ oh oh oh oh ♪ oh oh oh oh ♪ get ready ♪ moving ♪ ready or not ♪ get ready ♪ oh oh oh oh oh
4:37 pm
♪ hey with the most lobster dishes lobsterfesof the yearred lobster like lobster lover's dream and new ultimate lobsterfest surf and turf. so come lobsterfest today! and now for a limited time, get ten percent off red lobster to go. of non-drowsy claritin... and relief from symptoms caused by over... 200 outdoor and indoor allergens. like those from pollen, pets and dust. because new memories start
4:38 pm
with dusting off old ones. feel the clarity and live claritin clear. my dream car. it turns out, they want me to start next month. she can stay with you to finish her senior year. things will be tight but, we can make this work. ♪ now... grandpa, what about your dream car? this is my dream now. principal we can help you plan for that . mark: in my view you're the main litigator that says something if you want to make a ton of money you take on the media but you don't take on the media because of the first amendment because there are
4:39 pm
victims. now, one of the defenses will be this is just opinion so the standard is low. >> protected opinion. >> i have heard that 1 million times the supreme court has already responded for me in a case the supreme court made it clear there is no wholesale exemption for expression claimed to be opinion. pure opinion that is not capable to be proven true or false but when you start to put an article that says nicholas sandmann is a racist or a bigot and you are describing that he mocked or taunted or blocked or approached and stuck his face
4:40 pm
into the elder man's face, now you are describing conduct. it happened or didn't and if the basis of your so-called argument is false or incomplete that is actionable so the opinion defense will not be a major defense in any of these cases because the attacks on nicholas were attacks describing conduct. mark: under the moniker of news. >> yes. i don't know how you turn the page i'm sure they don't they have editorial pages anymore. someday but now it's all blurred together. the news is as much opinion. mark: you have been doing this a while. >> 23 years. mark: do you see a decline of
4:41 pm
professionalism from 20 years ago quick. >> yes. it is remarkable. when i started there was no internet. it wasn't yet a gleam in al gore's eye. [laughter] all of that has developed during my lifetime of law practice. and what should have been what was intended to be a benefit to society has turn into our worst nightmare. literally no one is safe from a false attack. you can live an impeccable life as an adult in nicholas is a child but he does aspire to be a lawyer. i have talked to him about
4:42 pm
that. what if he decides or somebody else decides with the stature and integrity and scholar to go to the supreme court? look at what happened to brett kavanaugh. i watch that initially i watched it with nicholas and i get the same feelings. here we go again. because now they just reach back into the bowels of the past and everything the internet has done it's all still there and the people that want to oppose a justice sandmann will dig out the garbage and misconstrue it and throw it back at him again. that is the kind of damage that is potentially therefore this young man and always looking over his shoulder because somebody like a
4:43 pm
hollywood celebrity will go headfirst. what are they thinking? this is a 16 -year-old kid so it has deteriorated. richard jewell was 33 years old they destroyed his life when he decided not to cut and run. they took richard that lisi got to age 33. now it is nicholas he is starting off as a 16 -year-old under that type of taint that never goes away and is there forever. if you are going to recognize the internet is permanent then you have to take greater precautions to make sure the record you are making is accurate. all we want from our media and all we should accept is news
4:44 pm
and truth and accuracy i don't see anything by the coverage of "the washington post" or cnn or nbc or abc. accuracy is at the bottom of the list that's the type of coverage to the point where we are now attacking children asking them questions do you think you did anything wrong? do you have any remorse? to stop trying to shame this young boy. >> they have no shame. mark: i will talk about the types of people that you will depose. don't forget almost every weeknight to watch levintv. go to blazetv/mark or call d5 844-levin-tv we will be right
4:45 pm
back. than the accident itself. that's why esurance makes it simple. just take some pics. [picture noises] go to sleep. wake up. grab a bite. maybe some racquetball. and boom - your money's on the way so you can get back on the road fast. well, not that fast. the editor had to make it fit in 30 seconds. it's pretty tricky actually trying to ... and ... tagline. when insurance is simple, it's surprisingly painless.
4:46 pm
when insurance is simple, [music playing] jerry has a membership to this gym, but he's not using it. and he has subscriptions to a music service he doesn't listen to and five streaming video services he doesn't watch. this is jerry learning that he's still paying for this stuff he's not using. he's seeing his recurring payments in control tower in the wells fargo mobile app. this is jerry canceling a few things. booyah. this is jerry appreciating the people who made this possible. oh look, there they are. (team member) this is wells fargo.
4:47 pm
4:48 pm
mark: nicholas sandmann council ongoing litigation with "the washington post" you'll sue cnn monday or
4:49 pm
tuesday so give us a feel how you are doing discovery. with all those types of information quick. >> the first stage will be documents e-mails, internal messaging the washington post as an internal messaging system we will see those in what the people were talking about amongst themselves at the momen moment. once we get that discovery then we will take full depositions somebody under oath, question them and cross-examine any reporter's name is on a byline they will be subject to a deposition then we will move up through the chain. >> where does the buck stop? who signed off on this? who didn't say first did you
4:50 pm
investigate? where is your source? where's the test quick. >> somebody on the editorial level needs to ask those questions but we will start on the bottom with the documents moved to the reporters and then the managers and then as others are identified we will move to them it is a monumental task but we are up for it. >> you have to prove the case. >> and my experience i have found found media defendants fight tooth and nail to prevent you from getting discovery they do not want you to know the truth how they made the sausage. mark: with cnn quick. >> absolutely we go back to media tapes quick. >> that parts of an interview we have a correspondence interview interestingly she did not give all of the
4:51 pm
information she obtained during those interviews so you pick and choose with these people that they saying - - they saw and they claim they heard that we know is not true whatever the gave to cnn that did not report that told them what they was reporting was inaccurate or at the least questionable. >> here is what we are looking at. nicholas sandmann did nothing wrong. what was promoted was false. so we will work back to figure out how you can take one clear incident and put out such a false narrative. how did it go wrong? we will trackback and find out the truth. mark: i watch jim acosta and i saw the media protect him when
4:52 pm
the president of the united states over the press conference and people are here from cnn over 200 people. because of your conduct i saw the media circle the wagons to protect him they did not think that was a first amendment issue because they are still free to have correspondence at the white house but yet he was disrupting a presidential press conference. it says the media will circle the wagon around "the washington post"? not nearly four freedom of the press but for the corporations to do the same quick. >> i don't understand the sense of it but i know it. i haven't had a request for interview cnn or cbs or abc or
4:53 pm
nbc nobody wants to talk about this fiasco. they don't want to talk about their mistakes or what they did to this boy they are not interested they are interested to circle the wagons as they always do historically and get the talking points out there every lawyer and defendant will write the same type of letter with the same type of defense and it is a mentality designed to protect but it is an error they really think they are above the law and that they are free under the first amendment to say whatever they please. they do not want accountability and they will circle the wagons and they will fight as hard as they can with all of their money because if you ever get to the point to hold them accountable
4:54 pm
for their wrongdoing, guess what? the wrongdoing stops. mark: we will be right back. nt. oh, don't worry. voya helps them to and through retirement... ...dealing with today's expenses... ...like college... ...while helping plan, invest and protect for the future. so they'll be okay... without me? um... and when we knock out this wall imagine the closet space? yes! oh hey, son. yeah, i think they'll be fine. voya. helping you to and through retirement. to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing it's best to make you everybody else... ♪ ♪ means to fight the hardest battle, .. it isn't. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. ♪ ♪
4:55 pm
( ♪ ) dealing with psoriatic arthritis pain was so frustrating. my skin... it was embarrassing. my joints... they hurt. the pain and swelling. the tenderness. the psoriasis. tina: i had to find something that worked on all of this. i found cosentyx. now, watch me. real people with active psoriatic arthritis are getting real relief with cosentyx. it's a different kind of targeted biologic. cosentyx treats more than just the joint pain of psoriatic arthritis. it even helps stop further joint damage. don't use if you're allergic to cosentyx. before starting, get checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor about an infection or symptoms. if your inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, or if you've had a vaccine or plan to. serious allergic reactions may occur. i got real relief. i got clearer skin and feel better. now, watch me.
4:56 pm
get real relief with cosentyx.
4:57 pm
get real relief ok i'll admit. i didn't keep my place as clean as i would like 'cuz i'm way too busy. who's got the time to chase around down dirt, dust and hair? so now, i use heavy duty swiffer sweeper and dusters. for hard-to-reach places, duster makes it easy to clean. it captures dust in one swipe. ha! gotcha! and sweeper heavy duty cloths lock away twice as much dirt and dust. it gets stuff deep in the grooves other tools can miss. y'know what? my place... is a lot cleaner now. stop cleaning. start swiffering. why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. we're the tenney's and we're usaa members for life.
4:58 pm
call usaa to start saving on insurance today. >> this was a simple event. no punches were thrown. there was a guy with a camera and the media got it totally wrong. they converted the truth into falsity. they did it because the false story advanced to their agenda. if the media can't get this type of a simple story right.
4:59 pm
if they can't keep their agenda out of a story like this, then when we are talking about substantive serious issues, you can't trust anything you are being told by the mainstream media. don't just be sceptical. go somewhere else to find the truth. mark: you think your litigation will help? >> if they can get away with this against a 16-year-old boy, a minor. then we are all at risk. if they want to convert him into a public figure, then we are all public figures. nobody's reputation will be safe. that's the simple fact. if they can do it to nicholas, they docket to anyone. there has got to be accountability, there has to be
5:00 pm
change. mark: lin wood, thank you. personally speaking. go get'em. [♪] jesse: welcome to. "watters' world." i'm jess pea watters. weather d i'm jesse watters. the political games begin after a gunman opens fire in christchurch. the left already blaming the president. >> there is intolerance being spread in this country, in this world, and it comes from the political dialogue. it comes from political leaders. >> words do have consequences. and we know that at the very pinnacle of power in our own country, people are talking ou

162 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on