told you about the vigil for the slain rapper. they are on the scene, trying to get things under control. we will keep you updated right here on on fox news on that st. most-watched, most trusted, most grateful you spend the evening with us. see you next time. ♪ >> tucker:ke good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." joe biden is in yet technically in the presidential race, but according to our reform act, he is the front runner as of right now, but that could change due to reports of joe biden sniffing the hair of women. also, the jussie smollett story continues to unfold. we will talk to the lawyer of the nigerian brothers who says that they were hired to attack smollett. there is always something a little bit poignant about the end of something. maybe that is why people get drunk on new year's eve, to end

it. but if you think new year's is depressing, how would you feel if you thought that all life on this planet was ending soon? 3 million years of human history erased forever. sad, isn't it? chris hayes think so. he is what every man would be if feminists ever achieved absolute powerti in this country. apologetic, bespectacled, and a deeply, deeply concerned about global warming. and the patriarchal systems that control it. he hosted a town hall event with alexandria ocasio-cortez, designed to promote her green new deal. this apparently seems like a wise idea to executives over at nbc come of the very same news outlet that spent two years lying to youou about russia bris the s 29-year-old former bartenr to teach you about science. he frames the terms at the outset of the show, unless you knew exactly what dr. ocasio-cortez says, the

entire human race has only 12 years to live. well, we have to deal with most catastrophic events, to cut emissions in half in 12 years. 12 years. that's w the project we've been tasked with by the earth. a bold new policy proposal that might be the most controversial thing in american politics at the moment. it's called the green new deal. some people call it a socialist monster. some people call it our only hope for survival here. >> tucker: it looks like a kind of allen fusion show. "our only hope for survival." holy smokes. that is terrifying. help us, chris hayes. what is it that this alone can prevent the death of her children? the good news is that alexandria ocasio-cortez has the cure for human extinction. all we have to do is obey her

and be very, very good people.ot >> and my framework, my belief that we not just have a wealthy society, but that we have a moral society. >> tucker: wait a second, you may be wondering. how does a member of congress who hasn't yet turned 30, someone who has never even raised her children, get the right to lecture me about morality? that's the difference between you and alexandria ocasio-cortez. she has a highly decent person. listen to her explain how she doesn't resort to ad hominem attacks, unlike her enemies, who by the way, our xenophobic white supremacist. >> we are talking about substances, not calling anyone names. people say the tea party of the left, and i find this phrase very interesting, because the grounding of the tea party was seen a phobia, the underpinnings of white supremacy. >> tucker: stop with the name

calling, you racist white supremacist xenophobe. so it's official, alexandria ocasio-cortez is moron, more self-righteous than any televangelist. she is awful. how did she get so famous? why do people like her? well, if we're being honest, we've got to say it's because not s everything she says is wrong. listen to this from the same town hall. ocasio-cortez takes a break from her idiotic climate theology, to offer what turned out to be a fairly insightful critique of the american economy. >> we have run away and come equality, one most in equal points economically speaking in american history. we are dealing with a crisis of how our economy is even made up. it is increasingly financial eyes, which means we are making profits off of interest, leasing your phone, doing all of these

things, but we aren't producing, and we aren't innovating in the way that we need to as an economy. >> tucker: okay. you hate to admit it, given the source, but try to ignore the way she says if you and may be printed out and read it. a lot of it is true. the republicans don't want to be unpopular anymore. they will do anything not to be unpopular. the democrats what what they have always wanted, complete and total control over you and this country. neither party will say that our economy is badly distorted. any economy based on interest payments isn't really an economy. it'sth a scam. healthy countries innovate. they make things. they don't treat people like interchangeable widgets. they don't worship finance. in a healthy country, bankers aren't heroes. private equity is not the highest paid profession. nobody brags about working at a hedge fund. in america right now, we have the opposite. unfortunately.

and that's why alexandria ocasio-cortez has her constituency. not because she's impressive. she's not. she is one of the people to say the obvious about growing corporate tierney. that doesn't mean she's right about anything else. taking power and giving it to her it would not solve our troblems. it would just put an even dumber person in charge, but she's right about the financial as asian part. she joins us. here is the way iss policies, having lived in washington. we don't know everything. name one proposal in the green new deal that you are aware of that would not increase the power of the democratic party. > well, the democratic partys a very big party. right now, i don't know if you heard, there is a divide between those like alexandria ocasio-cortez who are not taking corporate money and oil money, and those like the establishment. joe biden, perfect example of your taking a lot of corporate money, oil money. it so is a a divide in the part.

>> tucker: i just mean the policies. i know that there are all kinds of problems. we rejoice in them every night. i'm half kidding. the things that they plan to do, which oneoc wouldn't increase te power of the democratic party? >> well, that's essentially the point. it was a big business party. now it's not going to be if more people like alexandria ocasio-cortez are elected, so the green new deal is essentiallyay saying that the costs of climate change, which we have to admit, there are costs associated with that, they are not being put on every day people. not being put on the people who are fleeing their homes, whose homes have been hurt in storms, whether hurricanes or tornadoes or they are disbursed from their communities, but on the 1%, extracting from these people. making money. >> tucker: i'm going to ask it a third time. i understand what the talking

points are -- >> that's economics. >> tucker: it's good for everybody, fair, equitable. it makes us more moral. i just heard congresswoman bartender explained that. who gets more powerful? >> people. >> tucker: >> tucker: whoever as this plan will have control over a fifth of the u.s. economy. our w energy sector will be administering the largest building works project ever attempted. control over every building in the continental united states. that's more power than anybody has ever had. it will be vested in the hands ocasio-cortez and those who support her. this is a power grab. maybe it's also good. >> who would you rather have controlling the future of our livelihood? a bunch of big banks, who right now are determining whether or not there is a jobs program, whether or not homes are built, the infrastructure plan. they controlled most of congress, or would you rather have people, her campaign was

people funded, controlling their future? i vote for the people. everyday americans. >> tucker: but if you believe that climate change is an existential problem for the planet, it's going to end the planet in 12 years, which by the way, is not science, it's religion. >> 90% is science. >> tucker: do not claim that the planet will end in 12 years. that's just not true. i have google. i checked it. let me ask you this. at the heart of the proposal, something is good for the planet, but it does not make ocasio-cortez more powerful. everything in this proposal that i've read would make the democratic party more powerful. you can see why we would be a little bitem nervous about it. >> i think that they are more nervous about ocasio-cortez and ilhan omar, who ran people funded campaigns. i think they're more concerned about that than handing over the wheel again to donald trump, whg

ultimately, when we are talking of climate change, it's going to take more people funded politicians, who represent the people and not the banks. >> tucker: okay, but if you're using climate change as a pretext for taking over the most basic decisions of my life, how big my toilet can be, whether i have a woodstove, whether i can drive -- c no, i'm serious. shouldn't you know something about the science? shouldn't you know that there is not a consensus among scientists of the planet is going to change in 12 years? speak out it is a consensus that it is a reversible 12 years. >> tucker: there is no such thing. >> it is a scientific consensus that the majority of scientists believe that, 98.9% believe that it is irreversible in 12 years. just in ten years, cities like new york. >> tucker: i want to be able to check the facts. is there a website?

>> google.com. scientists who understand climate change. >> tucker: is there a membership committee that allows us? >> the association of scientist scientists. >> tucker: okay, great. will checkec that. i want to thank you and the association of scientists. 99% of whom agree with you. >> i'll see you under water, tucker. we can wave at each other. >> tucker: she is the author of the book "coolest," and he joins us on a few things very much for coming out. so i keep hearing, just from watching television in this country, that many people are dying of climate change in the united united states. is it a leading cause of death? >> now, by no means, and we actually have pretty good data for how many people are actually dying from weather-related disasters. and the truth is over the last hundred years, it has dropped

dramatically. every year, in the 1920s, we estimate about half a million people died around the world. now, we quadrupled the population, and yet, the number has dropped like a stone. it's 95% reduced. were now down to about 20,000 people that die every year. this is not because of global warming. getting richer means you stop being in trouble when the weather is bad. >> tucker: so if the problem is getting better, the threat is in decline. why focus on it? why not focus on cancer or diabetes or alzheimer's? or suicide? or drug deaths? these are all rising. >> the u.n. did that. they asked about 10 million people what do you want us to focus on, and they told us, perhaps not surprisingly, you worry about health care, food, and education. those were the top things that

came out. at the very end, number 16, global warming. nott surprisingly, if you are rich and well-meaning, this is one of the things you can start worrying about. global warming is a real problem, but it's not anywhere near the size of what most people lead you to believe. >> tucker: so maybe it's an easy problem for the richest in our society to focus on because it doesn't really require anything of them. they can still fly private and have four houses and be deeply concerned about this problem. elybe that's why they've chosen it. >> i think it certainly gives people a sense of "i'm really trying to do something good. i'm going to cut down. i'm no longer eating meat." something like that. the reality is if you really want to cut carbon emissions dramatically as many people talk about, you would have to experience a cost that would be much, much higher. you take for instance the new green deal, bloomberg estimates that -- this is just one of the

many estimates, it would cost every year about 2.1 truly in dollars. that's two-thirds of the u.s. budget. so no, we can't afford that. even if you did, the impact would be very small. in 100 years, it would be a very small and inefficient way of helping people very little. >> tucker:on so assuming this is about helping people, and i don't believe that. it's clearly about grabbing power. let's just pretend, in the name of helping them, you would probably wind up killing more than you would save because poverty does kill people. we know that. >> exactly. you have to be very careful. how do you help people, for instance, in bangladesh and other places? people will say well, we need to cut carbon emissionsle so they will have less of a problem in 100 years, but of course most people in bangladesh want to get out of poverty.vi we should help them by having more free trade, having more opportunity, more technology. those are the things that will

make them much richer, so that 12100 comes around, they will not only be better able to tackle global warming but all of the challenges. alzheimer, cancers, all of those things. >> tucker: you are fluent in the terms of science. how do you feel when you start feeling politicians discuss scientific issues with theological terms? talking about the morality of your society and making claims to their own virtue, does not make you uncomfortable? >> i'm an economist, actually, so i look at what the scientists are telling us. global warming is a problem, but it's also a moderate one. by the end of the century, global warming will cost somewhere between 2-4% of global gdp. by then, we will be about ten times richer per person, so 1000% richer, then we will have to pay 2-4%. that's a problem, not the end of the world.

we have to go morally do something that is cutting out meat or not driving your car or something in order to pacify this problem. they are simply talking against a better opportunity of actually dealing with this problem. it's not going to happen. you can tell people. what you need to do is focus on technology. everyone have had many problems in thehe past. we have not solve those problems by telling people could you please do it with less? what we have done is through technology enabled people to do more with less. actually be better off with technology. it's all about innovation. we need to innovate the price of green energy down below fossil fuels. everyone, not just rich well-meaning americans and europeans, but alsoo the chinese and others. >> tucker: of course, that's not on the table. thank you. i appreciate that.

thank you. joe biden o is pulling at the vy top of the democratic presidential field, but now we know that he has been decades long hairs never, can he maintain that position? mark steyn after the break. the latest innovation from xfinity

isn't just a store. it's a save more with a new kind of wireless network store. it's a look what your wifi can do now store. a get your questions answered by awesome experts store. it's a now there's one store that connects your life like never before store. the xfinity store is here. and it's simple, easy, awesome. >> tucker: before we begin this next segment, a warning toe our viewers at home, this is a show with a sense of propriety, a family show. we try not to put anything on t the screen that we would be ashamed to show our own children. omth that in mind, you may see

more pictures that make you uncomfortable, you may want to leave the room. it is about joe biden. he was supposed to be the front runner, and the polls show that he still is, but he has had a terrible weekend. he has phase backlash for physical behavior around women.e lucy florez on friday accused joe biden of making her feel deeply uncomfortable by kissing her without being asked on the back of the head added 2014 campaign event. she wrote a piece about it. congressional and accused of inappropriately touching her head in 2009. i its head thing.un she says in her view, biden should not run for president. speakim out i have answered this question many times, saying that personally, i do not believe that he should run. >> tucker: hair sniffers have no place in the modern democratic party. the rules are changing fast. that's where we are right now.

it is not a great look for joe biden. he is the man who has, over the years, and many times, recently, bemoaned the fraying of america's moral fabric. >> the fabric that holds up a society, the democracy, it's being shredded. there is an invisible moral fabric. >> there is an invisible moral fabric. >> there is an invisible moral fabric. >> this invisible moral fabric. >> there is an invisible moral fabric that holds up all of society. >> the moral fabric -- >> the moral fabric of society is indivisible but essential -- >> stop this anonymous erosion of the moral fabric. it is at the hands of donald trump and the republicans. >> >> tucker: the good news is, the moral fabric softener smells amazing. so, should it joe biden instead of the democratic race?

the others can't make up their a mind on it. >> i believe lucyjo florez, and joe biden needs to give give an answer. >> should he not run? >> that's for joe biden to decide. >> you know, i believe lucy florez. he's going to decide whether he is going to run or not. >> he will have to address this, that is what he will have to deal with the voters if he gets into the race. >> tucker: author and columnist mark steyn joins us. one of the many reasons i'm glad you're with us is to help make up my mind on this question. on the one hand, you think he is a warm person. i've met him. on the other hand, it's a lot of hair sniffing, this is a guy who they said he used to swim naked in front of them are female agents. something a little creepy. what should we think about this? >> you know, tucker, there's an invisible moral fabric that's fraying.

holding up the back of that lady's dress. which is why joe biden has got his nose between her shoulder blades, trying to keep it from fraying any further. you mentioned those secret service agents, and i've heard a lot of that. for it was saying that he doesn't think there is anything sexual about it, and i think that can be true and still not be a mitigating factor. you mentioned his habit of swimming naked in front of female secret service agents, who are there to take a bullet for the vice president. when he removes his swimming shorts and it tosses them over the head, that is not really the role that they are supposed to be taking. there is something that is actually slightly presumptuous about this behavior. in the way that it was when charlie rose use to do over at

pbs, used to do dress rehearsals undress. it's a power thing. it's that presumptuousness, and the democrats are completely morally and different on this, unless it serves their ends. what they want to do is take this guy out, the other candidates want to take him out the way jeb bush was taken out by trump 2-4 years ago. but they haven't got a trump to take out jeb bush with a single well-placed insults. low energy job. so you use what you have. that's why all of these candidates have basically decided this is the bullet that takes out joe biden. i don't think he's going to run because i don't think he wants to be defending a lottu of this stuff between now and november next year. >> tucker: there is a lot of hair sniffing. my one concern, obviously i'm enjoying this deeply. i think joe biden is fraudulent in a lot of ways and he shouldn't run, but you don't want to live in a society that'e

even colder and more atomized and more standoffish and more suspicious than the one we are already in. maybe the one good thing about him is arm around the shoulders, as he's done to me many times. you don't want to kill that entirely, do you? >> that's an interesting point because i was talking to someone just a couple of days ago who said he's actually a bit overly touchy-file with man too also. you're right. i think realistically, in this age of moral panic and #metoo, and i would not want to stand on a stage with female democrat candidates. i would want to put a lot of physical space between us. the fact is this is an utterly cynical move. you usee what you have. we are now two months from the equivalent point where trump came down that escalator and disrupted the whole republican process.

they haven't got anyone that bi big. kamala harris, cory booker, they want to get on with the real primary. >> tucker: that's what's happening. mark steyn. so smart. thank you. you. >> thanks o ane lot, tucker. >> tucker: the one thing with the democratic party, of course it's a party that believes survivors. so why aren't they pronouncing it to to denounceea joe biden me than they already are? an attorney, a former advisor for bill andnd hillary clinton. oh, as you can tell, normally we go into these conversations, you and i, and i've got a clear point of view, but i really am of two minds on this. on the one hand, that's a lot of hair to sniff. a lot, and on the other end, i think if the other candidates don't like biden, they should argue against what he saying, and not just attacking him sneakily in the way that they are. >> let me address both of your

points. i mean, what it's not is grabbing women by the genitals and then bragging about it. it's not forcing somebody down on a bed and putting his hand over their mouth. it's not having an affair with a playboy bunny while his wife has a -- >> tucker: it's not juanita, is what you are saying. it's not being accused of rape. >> speak out as biden proudly s, you are not running against the alternative.is the this year, that will be donald trump. >> tucker: hold on. wait, i am actually more forgiving of joe biden, i think, than people in general. i am flawed.rg it's all people are. i'm more forgiving than the other democratic candidates. oh, i can't believe it. he's such bad man. it's like really? >> if democrats run joe biden off because of this, they deserve to lose. because joe biden -- standards

change. you know, the founding fathers had. barack obama was against same-sex marriage, and biden brought him around. what biden did some years ago, it's not something that -- floras, incidentally, she was a bernie sanders person. my guess is that she wants bernie sanders to be the -- >> tucker: hold on. t i thought that we believed all women. i've been taught that. you believe all women, even if they supported bernie sanders, so you're saying that her political views make her less believable? i'm saying even joe biden doesn't take issue with the credibility of what she issa saying. he saying his intent was not kind of anything of anything negative. and he wants to listen to her. he's not so -- basically saying that she is not to be believed. if you believe her, it's not something that should be his

undoing because you're looking at the totality. the voters should decide. >> tucker: this is a sincere question. i'm l not attacking biden. there is a lot of hair sniffing. this is not what i want talking point. what is that about? have you ever sniffed a stranger's honestly. >> he's a a handy guy. >> tucker: it's an old factory thing. what is that? >> i'm just saying, he is a handy guy. he is a touchy guy. so when you have him on your show, you could ask him what that's been about. >> tucker: t i'm going to ask him. i'm not going to judge him. do you like to sniff people? totally fine. >> i think it's a question of humanity, and i think if we turn our back on that, shame on all of us. >> tucker: i love it. richard, great to see you tonight. jussie smollett has still not admitted what it is to everyone else in america. he staged a fake hate crime. instead, he's telling us that

the two body builder brothers he worked with attacked him apparently while wearing white face. he was confused. he didn't know it was them. the attorney of those brothers joins us after the break. ♪

>> it features exclusive shows. a commentary by me, your favorite fox personalities. we give it to you straight on all the issues that we, the american people, care the most about. we hope you will check it out. ♪ that is too many. they set this government, not for the entire world, the people of the united states of america. >> that is the stronger than the feminist part, it is the strongest part. >> they are among the best. >> he fights back. they really love that about him. >> america is the only country on the face of the earth that is not built on blood and soil. >> tucker: jussie smollett is still dividing america nearly a week after the illinois state's attorney kim foxx dropped all charges against him for so obviously faking a hate crime.

today, they are continuing rallies in chicago. he joins us tonight with an update. matt. >> tucker, the jussie smollett tension came to a head today right here outside of kim foxx's office. they protested against him, foxx saying that she has a history of being antipolice, exonerated known game members, and they are demanding that she resign. well, it was a clash of protest, as kim foxx supporters, led by jesse jackson, rallied against police. they got each other's faces. he tells fox news that he thinks the investigation is very wrong. alleges kim foxx is reforming the criminal justice system and is the target of political attacks. she is still defending her actions, writing an op-ed "sense it seems expedient to do this,

let me state publicly that i welcome review of how we handle this." they fired right back "it barely merits a response. a grand jury returned a 16 count indictment. it is her duty to prosecute this crime. she refuses to do so." she also wrote in the "chicago tribune" that she is going to personally petition the courts here to assign a special prosecutor to investigate kim foxx. tucker. >> tucker: from chicago, thanks a lot for that. well, even kim foxx acknowledges that she believes jussie smollett is guilty of taking a hate crime, but the actor will still not admit that. instead, his lawyer says that the osundairo brothers may have put on white face to attack him. >> according to the court records, he was very clear that the attackers were white. so they had masks on and gloves, but he saw their eyes and the

skin surrounding their eyes. was that a false statement? obviously, you can put makeup on. it took me all of 5 minutes to google -- i was looking of the brothers, and one of the first videos that showed up was one of the brothers and white face. it is not implausible. >> tucker: not implausible. is it implausible? gloria schmidt is representing those brothers. thank you very much for coming on. you heard of that they could have attacked him while wearing white face makeup. did they? [laughs] >> is preposterous on top of more ridiculousness for her to come out and say that. you know it? of course, anything is possible in that world, but probable? no. >> tucker: so do your clients concede that they were a part of this hoax? >> absolutely. they cooperated, tucker, from

day one. their main focus was always to not be part of a fraud. you know, tucker, if you look at the very little media that they've done, they've apologized for their role, and they feel tremendously regretful for their participation in this. we are waiting on that -- i'm sorry, go ahead. >> tucker: where they employed by smollett? i read that one of them had worked for the show. they had worked for his show, they had worked for him in some capacity. is that correct? >> that's correct. remember that there was a friendship. they had met onset. they had known each other for, you know, not more than a year. they really put their trust in someone who they thought was their friend, someone who had influence, someone who could make a game changer for them in

their careers. so that's what this is really about. we're seeing that in the news on various different fronts, people putting their trust in the wrong person. the worst is hollywood. >> tucker: so they follow his lead, they take money from him in order to pull off this fake hoax. they get caught, so does smollett. he blames them for it and lies about it and then beats all the charges. what do they make of that? >> here's the thing about the osundairo family. and i'm very proud to be able to say this. they are amazing people. it would have been very easy for them to lawyer up, to say we are not saying anything. we are not going to help the public heel. they wanted to make sure that they weren't parts of that frau fraud. so their value system clearly came out while they were -- they

went through a realization process that was -- what jussie wanted to do was tear people apart more. not bring them together. one of the first statements that they released, they said that. they were not were not homophobic, they were not racist, and they were not anti-trump. >> tucker: so what do they think the motive for this was? there have been a bunch of explanations. why do they think smollett did this? >> you know what? i hate to not answer a question on your show, but truthfully, the motives and their intentions, their feelings, things that go to that, i think would be a better set from them. when the time is right, they will come out and say their story. it's just not the right time. >> tucker: of course they're welcome here. finally, do they face any legal jeopardy at all? are they done with this process? >> they're done. there's been a lot of questions about well, are they going to

get investigated? are they looking at this coconspiracy charges? you can be a coconspirator to something that is not illegal. so for example, if i asked you to go out to the street and put a noose around my neck, which i would never ask you to do that, but if i had, that's not illegal. that's just not illegal. about calling the police and saying that somebody did, that is illegal. my clients didn't do anything illegal. >> tucker: and they didn't wear whiteface to beat up their boss without his knowledge. thanks for clarifying that. thank you for laughing. it's worth laughing at. good to see you. >> tucker: thank you, tucker. >> tucker: many top democrats have staked out, amazingly, in the last couple of months, the party of infanticide. most americans are not for that. it do most americans want abortion, more abortion, or less abortion? simple question, straightforward

answer. after the break.

>> tucker: you've heard a lot recently about how ilhan omar of minnesota doesn't like israel. that is definitely true. she doesn't like israel. you have her next to nothing about how she doesn't like this country. she -- this doesn't seem to bother anybody. it should. here iss what omar recently told vogue arabia. she described living in the u.s. asha "an everyday assault. america is so racist and hateful that she feels threatened, demonized everyday. it m is difficult for her even o go to work. things were easier growing up in a refugee camp in kenya, she says.

"when you're a kid and your raised in an all-black, all muslim environment, nobody talks to you about your identity. there is freedom in knowing that you are accepted as your full self." that freedom, she says, doesn't exist in america. so pause and think about that for as i can. ilhan omar is country collapsed as a child. she may have died there without outside help, but health came from where? from here. america. she didn't just -- we pay to relocate her family and many others from a foreign continent purely for altruism. no country in history has been as it generous as we are. no ties, no obligations. that is who we are. despite her humble and foreign birth, she has been elected to a national lawmaking body. good for her. how does she repay her adopted country, the one that may literally have saved her life?

she attacks it as needful and racist, and for that, she is applauded by the democratic party. they view this country as hateful and racist too. the more elana myers country has come of the better. how about another suggestion? maybe our immigration system should prior to his people who actually like this country and are grateful to be here. why wouldn't we do i that? in just a few months, the democratic party hasti become wy more radical on abortion that any party on earth. new york has legalized abortion up until the moment of birth. literally the moment of birth. defended infanticide, that wass barely a scandal. democrats are far more upset about face paint 30 years ago. is that in step with what america wants? the movie "unplanned," a pro-life movie did very well. despite having his twitter account briefly shut down with no explanation. of course, you know what the

explanation was. the state legislator there just band abortion conducted based on the child's race or sex. we are grateful to talk to matt bevin. thanks ani lot. so, abortion on the basis of disability is, gender, or race. you wouldn't think that somebody would do something that horrifying. >> this is a nonhugh jennings bill, saying you cannot kill a child based on its disability, gender, or race. aligning it very specifically with a lot of federal statutes. whether it is other things that literally prevent -- theyef are defended by the aclu in people who are outside the womb, but they felt that was too much to expect of a child who has not yet been delivered. and it is reprehensible. to your point -- >> tucker: there against

offending a child, a fetus, on the basis of race? really? it's okay to have a re-selective abortion? >> they think it's a step too far to say that you should not kill ae child based on its race or gender or some perceived disability. it is, to your point, this guild has come off the lily of it being a rare and unsafe family go. they don't care about that anymore. and ever was intended to be rare. it is now literally when and how -- however someone would want to see this happen. it's reprehensible to me that you have the aclu does not even trying to serve its past defense of civic liberty is into literally attacking a bill that is on its face something that we should applaud. >> tucker: sex-selective abortions are very widespread across the world. s that is a reason that they have so many more boys than girls, really. in india and china. is there any support for sex-selective abortion?

like they have to have this. >> sadly, it is done. to what degree it is supported by the general populace, i think people would be offended at this. for good reason. we have legislators in kentucky who are leading the charge on this. young senator who has sponsored a bill related to a heartbeat at six weeks or whenever a heartbeat is first detective, that abortions beyond that could not be performed in kentucky. that also was immediately challenged.ut the one who sponsored this bill they are talking about, this noneugenics -- >> tucker: did any democrats orpported? >> in america, the more we know about medicine and science, the more we know about what really is happening inside of the womb, it is evident that that is a human being. it is not going to be born and come out as a chicken or something. nobody is under the impression it is anything other than that. the more we look with

technology, the more we know this to be true -- >> tucker: self planned parenthood, is it a little bit weird i to get lectures about morality from people who align with planned parenthood? >> think about the history, hemargaret sanger, the founder, she was one of the greatest apologist 100 years ago for eugenics, which believes that removing unfavorable people, people that were unpleasant, people that would water down the gene pool of humanity, people who were immigrants, people of color, people who are poor, people who are disabled, she felt that these were undesirable character traits, and they need to be removed from the human gene pool. she was the founder of planned parenthood, so the idea that 100 years later, they still give awards in her name, they are still practicing that, it should not be shocking. >> tucker: that's why theyoo put it in the inner city. they still feel that way. thank you for being here tonight. racial segregation, amazingly,

one of the worst things this country ever did, is coming back, courtesy of the left. what do they think of it not? after the break.

♪ >> tucker: for almost 100 years, racial segregation was a factor in part of this country, and it was a stain on this country. thankfully, it was a limited half a century ago but now it is

making a comeback in some places where the left is dominant, primarily college campuses. radicals are openly endorsing segregated housing, harvard has a segregated great drama graduation. young white rebels say it is needed to fix racism. here is what this filmmaker found. >> would you support segregated housing for black people? speak with a lot of schools have interest housing were students f color can live together. >> separate from white people? >> it's normal. >> you guys are cool with that? >> we are not going to offer black students separate housing. >> yeah, i would support it. there is no problem with that. >> i would be supportive of it. >> why not? >> it wouldn't change anything for me because -- but if it -- >> i couldn't tell. >> do you support black students

have their own graduation? >> if that's what they want. >> would you be okay with that? >> yes. >> separate graduation? >> absolutely. >> several blocks away from the campus and the local black community, the opinions on this issue. >> why, are we going back in time? >> i don't understand. >> i feel like that is basically segregation. >> that are segregation and that shouldn't be happening. is because that terrible. >> segregation might not be the ultimate goal but people are taking it that way. >> do you think it's racist? >> i would think. >> tucker: [laughs] the greatest ever. what a brilliant idea. thank you so much for joining u us. was that pretty much the universal reaction from african-americans you spoke to? >> i didn't find a single person who thought this was a good idea. they were gob smacked. some of them are looking at me like, i don't know what you're

talking about. >> tucker: [laughs] did you tell them, it is for your own code? >> the white man is telling you what is good for you. this is so dangerous on so many levels. never mind thattda it reawakens this notion of segregation that we've been fighting for generations, but it's focusing on the politics of racial identity, playing on that, in the absolute worst way. when they ask harvard, did their policy, they said, we want to give something for our marginalized students. i'm thinking to myself, any place on planet earth, a black person feels the least marginalized in all of earth on the university of campus. if marginalization was a yardstick for what they need to have to segregate people, conservatives should be the only ones to have their separate housing and gems and campuses. >> tucker: i'm starting to think that only people who make under 100 grand a year should be making our social policies of

all policies. if you make this person, can you change your sex by tapping your shoes together -- is transparently done. most people know that, i think. >> it is totally insane. i have to say, i did find a group of people that did agree with this. the end of the video, i found a group that is so woke that they have been this book for generations. i spoke with the head of the kkk of north carolina, and he loves this idea. his wife was so happy, she was crying, she was so thrilled at what these people are doing to the black students. we found a group that enjoyed it. >> tucker: would like the scene at the end of "animal farm" where the pigs and men are eating together and you can't tell one from the other. talk about betraying thet. revolution. very smart and interesting andep deep. thank you very much. pleasure. >> tucker: we are out of time. amazingly, don't know where the hour brand. we'll be back tomorrow, 8:00 p.m. the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, heand groupthink.

all of which are an over abundance right. a don't worry. things will get better. good night from washington. our good friend, one of our all-time favorites, sean hannity is in new york city to host a tv show. >> sean: it's not even a surprise anymore. let me straighten my tie off. there we go. we got it straight. great show, tucker, as always. good to see you. welcome to "hannity." just breaking as we speak tonight, well, we call him creepy and crazy uncle joe biden for a reason. well, now he's facing a second accusation of inappropriate touching. been a rough week for the democratic party, and it's only monday. congresswoman ocasio-cortez embarrassing herself yet again, senator elizabeth warren running out of other peoples money money, and wannabe columnist and communist, oh, bernie sanders, he can't answer a simple question about his own policies. you just heard the breaking news. creepy crazy uncle joe biden