can't afford to take care of working families. it's not for lack of money. there's plenty of money in this world. it's just in the wrong hands. >> sean: we'll never be the rage trump media. >> don't they want to charge $40 to drive into manhattan? i mean, yeah, you never run out of other people's money. it's nuts. >> sean: it was funny because andrew cuomo the governor said tax the rich. we tax the rich and the rich leave. they're leaving in droves because you're chasing them away. >> laura: yeah, there's only so many chinese and russians that will come and buy those big penthouses. >> sean: have a great show. >> laura: all right. i'm laura ingraham. this is the "the ingraham angle". there's a mystery though in this city.

who from mueller's team is leaking? the hills's john solomon has some answers and a message to the media who published these leaks. plus, there were protests tonight across the country and today calling on attorney general bill barr to release the full mueller report. but do these people even know what they're protesting? we sent arroyo down into the crowd and he's going to bring the protest to life in this studio. it is hysterical. did the disgraced "empire" star make his deadline to pay back the city. but first, the democrats, make america hate again. that's the focus of tonight's angle. just when you think they cannot get any nuttier, the ever radicalized members of the

president's opposition party surprise us all anew. after going full on red scare for two years only to be left jilted at the altar of impeachment, democrats are returning to racial pandering and grievance pedalling. they paint america as a place of near-constant oppression. >> identity politics is nothing more complex than saying, i see that there are barriers for you, because you are physically disabled and we don't provide access, you can't get that job. if you suffer from mental illness and you can't get your medication, then your identity matters because i can't solve your problem because i don't understand it. i believe in identity politics. >> >> laura: now, one by one, the 2020 democrat hopefuls and a smattering of others have made

the pilgrimage to the conference in manhattan, aka the reverend al primary, they're calling it. now, in an interview promoting his big conference, reverend al sounded like a king or maybe a queen maker. >> i think cory's got to show something and we've got to not excuse the rest of them. i told bernie sanders, you are a progressive but are you a progressive on race? i want to know about our particular matters because we have particular problems. >> >> laura: yes, there's a new left wing litmus test. >> i've always supported reparations. and first of all, we can debate about how we get it, but let's be clear that we're owed. every candidate needs to say, yes, we are indebted, because we

took. >> laura: and just like that, the 2020 democrats marching down his cynical and crooked reparations road. now, their goal is to punish americans who had nothing to do with slavery in order to appear as the most woke in the field. >> would you sign that bill? yes. the injustices that have been visited and continue to be visited on people we will never get the change that we need to live up to the promise of this country. >> i talk a lot in this campaign about intergenerational justice, what one generation owes to another. >> our country will never truly heal unless we address the original sin of slavery. >> laura: and they're also seeking absolution for their past sins. all lives matter. during a dispute about whether

south bend police, their tape recordings should be made public. see sweet pete grovel. >> what i did not understand at that time was that that phrase, just early into 2015, was coming to be viewed as a counterslogan to black lives matter. it's a reason why to push back on that activism. i stopped using it in that context. >> laura: harvard and oxford must be so proud. well, he's the perfect embodiment of the milquetoast millennial class. the amazing thing is how today's democrats feel the need to live in almost a constant state of denial, denial of all the amazing gains that have been made by americans of all disadvantaged backgrounds, especially under the trump administration. and heck, they even deny losing elections that they actually

lost. >> we can work as hard as we want. we can fight right, but if you're fighting against the system that's designed to oppress you, sometimes you have to fight longer than you planned. i decided to acknowledge the stakes of the election, but i refuse to concede. concession means to say something is right and true and proper. >> laura: can you imagine if brian kent had lost by four votes she had won and he had challenged the results of the election, what she would have said? in an era of low employment, off the charts real wage growth finally, what message do these folks offer america's voters? i'll tell you what they offer. resentment, anger, division, and alienation. and these democrats don't even acknowledge obvious gains, but they won't because to do so would affirm that trump's

policies are working. can't have that. now, remember, it did take a president to pass reform, which is helping so many families across america. and meanwhile, the democrats offer more demonization of the police. >> there must be accountability for the enforcement of the law. there must be accountability for use of force. and federal funds to local police departments and sheriff departments must be tied to accountability. >> laura: now, you might not have thought that the civil rights act was ever even passed more than 50 years ago or that black americans have reached the highest levels of business, the law, medicine, entertain. watching and listening to this democrat kowtow to al sharpton makes it seem like americans

didn't elect and then reelect it's first black president. obama's victories were just baby steps. they want full-on income confiscation meant to enforce equal outcomes, if not equal opportunity. >> we're in the post-obama generation. we've already seen a black president and first family. now we want to know what it is going to mean. symbolism is not enough now. it's substance. and if there's no substance, then we've gotten over the aura of the first. >> laura: wow, pretty dismissive of obama there. today is the anniversary of the assassination of the reverend

martin luther king jr. if he were alive, i wonder what he would think. joining me now -- it's great to have all of you on the show. what does it say about the democrats that they all feel the need to kiss reverend al's ring? >> division works. if you rile up people, if you get them angry instead of looking at the gains that have been achieved, their party can benefit. they need 85 to 95% of black americans to vote straight-ticket democrat. the problem is, many black americans, white americans, and brown americans, are looking around and saying, "what am i getting with all of this division?" >> laura: shane, were you surprised by what al said about

two terms of obama? i mean, he was obviously in the white house a lot. he was well liked. he was -- i don't know -- kind of an unofficial advisor. valerie jared mentioned that today, to the obama administration. gosh, eight years, re-elected and majority of white voters supported him. and it's kind of like, well, yeah, that was a first, but now on to the real deal. >> well, you know, laura, i was a representative of the network well over five years i worked with the organization and i've seen them do a lot of good work around this country, particularly when it comes to assisting families and in situations where they've lost their family members due to police shootings in particular situations where even artists and others have been helped and assisted by this great organization that does good work, like many of the legacy civil rights organizations. and i think that national action networks' convention is an

opportunity to convene around where we are now. we did the same thing around president obama. when president obama was in office, president obama visited our convention when i was a part of national action network twice. and both times there was a challenge to the president to come and deal with some of the very important issues facing black america. >> laura: and how did he do? what kind of a grade do you give him? >> i give president obama a b, because i think that president obama, although he was not perfect, he didn't do everything that black america wanted him to do, he delivered on a lot of important issues, like healthcare, where many, many, many, now, including -- >> laura: look at their stocks. i hope you have them in your portfolio. >> i'm talking about people. i'm talking about everyday people, african-americans in our community. president obama did very well around criminal justice reform. >> laura: he didn't get it

through. come on. this is where you guys -- trump got it through. where was the tweet from obama this week? come on, don't grand stand. talking over me doesn't make it any more true that this president seated in the white house right now is the one who had the moxie to put it all on the line when he was getting no credit from the national action network. the only person who showed up was van jones. >> and i was there. i was sitting right behind the attorney general barr. >> laura: well, good, because today they didn't talk about giving trump my credit. i want to go to you on this, because this is what chris hayes at msnbc. there is discrimination in the country. women still experience it. blacks still -- there are bad actors in the world.

there always will be. but this is what chris hayes said about the republican party after criminal justice real estate form. let's watch. >> one-half of the political party system is essentially a segregated entity. there's two parties. one party is almost entirely all white. it's a factual thing. >> laura, i've been hearing this garbage since we were in the college and i've been told the republican party is the party of the white people. and that hasn't been the case in my 30 years involved in politics. we don't even talk about that in the party. going back to al sharpton, what people are letting him off the hook for is he's the granddaddy of this smollett situation. he has been pandering hoaxing. talk about reparations. but everybody's forgotten that

and moved on. and what we really are seeing is the al sharpton struggle sessions here. like the cultural revolution in china, in order to get to the next level, the elders have to come and apologize and wear a dunce cap. why is he apologizing? >> laura: why are these people acting like they were in alabama in 1930 with hoses? >> it's embarrassing. i don't owe any reparations and you don't owe any reparations. >> mayor pete is apologizing though because many in this country have said all lives matter. we've got to really deal with that. because black lives matter -- >> and all those people's lives matter. >> that's what it's about. black lives matter, too. >> laura: shane, hold on. i agree with you, to this

extent. black lives matter too should have been the slogan. i think that's a great slogan. >> we can disagree without being disagreeable. >> the goal of black lives matter was to say that black lives matter too. that was the goal. >> laura: okay. i want to talk about reparation. >> it's all rhetoric. >> laura: shane, i'm really glad you're at the white house. so kudos to you for being there. that says a lot about you that you were there. a lot of people didn't show up. >> i think this is a good place where we should give the president credit and give his administration credit, but we also have to hold him accountable to the millions of other dollars that are going to be needed to get more people out of prison. and that's why we're working with van jones and others, too. p >> laura: that's why we need to not send it to people who are breaking into the country illegally. i want to read something. this is what jason riley wrote in the wall street journal about the reparations debate a couple

of weeks ago. he's talking about kamala harris's comments about how people are responsible for these past racial sins. that requires ignoring the progress made by blacks both in absolute terms and relative to whites who live much closer to the era of slavery. it did not exist in those communities in the first hundred years after emancipation. even though poverty rights at the time were much higher and racism was still legal and widespread. jason riley's point, shane, your reaction to that. his point is how do you tag that with today's problems, given that long period of lower crime rates, lower homicide rates of black men by black and of black men and other social

pathologies, which were much lower during that long time period, until actually coming up to the '60s and '70s? >> we must address what the african-americans compensation-wise should get. we gave reparations to many others in this country. in the indian community you see it. but yet and still, african-americans are still disproportionately unemployed. african-americans have not gotten the opportunities or resources that many other communities have gotten. and i think that this argument is valid regarding reparations. >> laura: you're not arguing. you're just stating your wish and saying everybody has to agree with it.

but the overwhelming majority of americans -- >> including a majority of -- >> laura: now let horace speak. >> it doesn't make sense. there is no correlation between the status of a black american, white american, brown american today and what's happened with slavery. we have had an intermixing, an immigration effort that has changed and transformed the makeup of this country. you're not even able to identify. does kamala harris -- >> how are you going to talk about immigration when you were supporting the make america great movement, which is to push immigrants out of the country? >> we can have different opinions, but we can't have different facts here. let's be real here. >> laura: she's from india. >> can i tell you something?

>> all these people are talking about how horrible america is? trust me, they don't want to go back from wherever they came from because it's much worse there. this is the best country in the world. >> laura: creating more grievance or more reventment -- if you tell the serbian guy who came in five years ago, some of your money is going to go somalian refugee, that will cause problems. i don't get that. smollett is not paying $150,000. >> that's right. the city of chicago is not going to be at war with itself. the city attorney's office is going to go prosecute him and we'll see what happens. file a civil lawsuit and he's continuing to be in denial, but

if he keeps up with this path, in a few years he can have is summit like al sharpton and make a career out of that. >> laura: maybe he can actually be head of that. >> as a matter of fact, al sharpton was one of the most legitimate civil rights organization in this country that has done good work in the community and it is a reputable candidates to address issues. >> laura: have they ever been invited to speak at the national action network, any ideological -- no. it's great to have a great conversation with issues. thank you so much. john solomon is here next with new reporting about the latest whodunit, which one of the

disgruntled member of the mueller team is leaking to the new york times? you don't want to miss his latest report from the field. there they are. feel the clarity of non-drowsy claritin and relief from symptoms caused by over 200 indoor and outdoor allergens. like those from buddy. because stuffed animals are clearly no substitute for real ones. feel the clarity. and live claritin clear. we really pride ourselvesglass, on making it easy to get your windshield fixed. with safelite, you can see exactly when we'll be there. saving you time for what you love most. >> kids: whoa! >> kids vo: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ i got it! what? what? l.a. bookers book apartments and vacation homes as easy as hotels. ridin' scooter! l.a. baby! l.a. baby! be a booker you're welcome. at booking.com

you're welcome. and i recently had hi, ia heart attack. it changed my life. but i'm a survivor. after my heart attack, my doctor prescribed brilinta. it's for people who have been hospitalized for a heart attack. brilinta is taken with a low-dose aspirin. no more than 100 milligrams as it affects how well brilinta works. brilinta helps keep platelets from sticking together

and forming a clot. in a clinical study, brilinta worked better than plavix. brilinta reduced the chance of having another heart attack... ...or dying from one. don't stop taking brilinta without talking to your doctor, since stopping it too soon increases your risk of clots in your stent, heart attack, stroke, and even death. brilinta may cause bruising or bleeding more easily, or serious, sometimes fatal bleeding. don't take brilinta if you have bleeding, like stomach ulcers, a history of bleeding in the brain, or severe liver problems. slow heart rhythm has been reported. tell your doctor about bleeding new or unexpected shortness of breath any planned surgery, and all medicines you take. if you recently had a heart attack, ask your doctor if brilinta is right for you. my heart is worth brilinta. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. yeah, i've had some prettyeer. prestigious jobs over the years. news producer, executive transport manager, and a beverage distribution supervisor.

now i'm a director at a security software firm. wow, you've been at it a long time. thing is, i like working. what if my retirement plan is i don't want to retire? then let's not create a retirement plan. let's create a plan for what's next. i like that. get a plan that's right for you. td ameritrade. ♪ >> laura: all right, last friday night we predicted that the

media's crush on mueller just would not stop, despite the end of the investigation. now, i hate to say it, but we told you so. they found a new mueller story to keep the romance going, to stoke their fantasies. now, mainly that anonymous folks on the mueller team are actually upset by the barr memo. president trump's lawyer rudy giuliani reacted to this lame bombshell last night on our show. >> they're a bunch of sneaky unethical leakers and they are rabid democrats who hate the president of the united states. and i can tell you how much false information they've leaked during the course of the investigation. >> laura: after the initial new york times story broke yesterday, a media pile-on ensued. almost as if they all share the same disgruntled sources. and then of course the cable propagandists weren't far

behind. >> we've got big breaking news tonight, what appear to be the first-ever leaks from the mueller team, sending a shot across the bow to the attorney general. >> new and potential explosive reporting. >> this is remarkable. >> the timing could not be better for the democrats. >> thought it was all over. well, maybe not. >> laura: if any of that sounds familiar, it's because it is. this is the same reaction we've seen from these jokers for the last 22 months. now, i guess what they say is true. you never forget your first love. and their first love is bob mueller. joining me now with some exclusively new reporting for us is john solomon, executive vice president for the hill. all right, john, you say you haven't seen anything like this in your entire reporting career. okay, explain that. >> well, seldom seen something like this i think is what i actually said. here's why. the title of my column basically says if you don't indict, you

can't incite. the justice department rules derived from our constitution says if a prosecutor cannot bring charges in a federal court, they can't block it in the court of public opinion and try to smear you. that's what last night's leak was, disgruntled mueller sycophants trying to smear the president. it really gets to the political nature of what's been going on. when the mueller people wrote the report, they wrote these campaign summaries that could be released instantly to the public. that's not what they're supposed to do. there's law enforcement information here, grand jury information. we can't release this. they've been doing the diligent thing. what sort of prosecutors create a final report that looks more like a campaign document? >> laura: is that what you were told by the doj?

who's leaking? everybody's leaking back and forth here. they're trying to defend themselves obviously. >> yeah. >> laura: so, your understanding is that the summaries, as they're calling it, that mueller's team themselves produce, they themselves contain grand jury information that cannot be released? >> that's why the justice department had to slow down and fix what was there. they're going through that process. they give the public as much transparency as the law allows. >> laura: ken delany said this. >> we're hearing from a separate u.s. official that some members of the mueller team say that the evidence on collusion, while not establishing a criminal conspiracy, is actually very compelling. we need to see this report. the barr summary, by many accounts, did not quite do it justice. >> laura: okay.

now, the standard for nbc now is if it's compelling. not criminal, compelling. yay. >> the constitution and the justice department are clear. i think this is the final chapter in a very long three-year saga in which we've seen assets used to settle political scores rather than do what they're paid to do. >> laura: john, thank you for the reporting. we really appreciate it. in additi but he's yet to make an official request or issuance so far. joining me now is former deputy attorney general of the united states. is nadler bluffing with this subpoena? >> i don't think he is. i think he's going to demand that mueller report be produced, but it's just a cynical stunt because, first, as you pointed

out just now, it would be illegal for the justice department to release the mueller report in full because there's classified and grand jury information. congress has agreed and passed laws that prohibit all that being put out in public. second, to enforce a subpoena it would take years. >> laura: how would that work? >> nadler and the committee would issue the subpoena. the justice department would refuse on these grounds that we have secret things we're required to take out. nadler would try to go to court to enforce the subpoena. >> laura: d.c. district court first. >> d.c. circuit court, but the d.c. circuits never wanted to step in the middle of this. and it takes years. t >> laura: what kind of legal jeopardy could barr be in if he complied with that subpoena?

>> he can't comply with the subpoena. he would be violating the law. he's the attorney general. he's supposed to enforce the law. it's amazing nadler figured out a way to issue a subpoena to someone to break the law. >> laura: twilight zone. i have to ask you another question which has been bugging me. what about executive privilege? what about the deliberative process privilege? why wouldn't the president's legal team say, wait a second, all the conservations the president had with staff about various issues that mind shoehorned into this report by all the democrats on that staff, why would that -- they not challenge some of this stuff being released on executive privilege? >> that's a great question and we've overlooked that. in addition to grand jury and classified information, there's all information that's protected by the constitution that the supreme court has recognized about the confidentiality of conversations between the president and his aides and

advisors. the president could choose to keep that privileged and not release it to congress. president trump could also waive it. but he should have the opportunity and attorney general barr would normally look at the report to take that out as well. >> laura: well, to get a privilege review. and farce -- as far as we know, the president is waiving his executive privilege. i wouldn't waive any of this stuff. i wouldn't trust these people not to cherry pick conversations. >> i would urge the president and his advisors to do the review because they've got to think about future presidents and future aides need to have candid open discussions. >> laura: what about michael cohen's hail mary? he said he found another hard drive somewhere, and there might

be documents on it. don't send me to prison. >> he wants to stay in prison longer than he was going to because this means he hid evidence from prosecutors. >> laura: where did he find the hard drive? >> if he deliberately hid it, he could actually end up going to jail for longer. >> laura: it's a desperate move. thanks so much for coming in. and does stacey abrams represent today's purest form of liberalism? it may represent the future of the democrat party. and later raymond arroyo. you don't want to miss it. each day justin chooses to walk. at work... and after work. he does it all with dr. scholl's.

only dr. scholl's has massaging gel insoles that provide all-day comfort. to keep him feeling more energized. dr. scholl's. born to move. always a catch. like somehow you wind up getting less. but now that i book at hilton.com, and i get all these great perks. i got to select my room from the floor plan... very nice... i know, i'm good at picking stuff. free wi-fi... laptop by the pool is a bold choice... and the price match guarantee. how do you know all of this? are you like some magical hilton fairy? it's just here on the hilton app.

just available to the public, so... book at hilton.com and get the hilton price match guarantee. if you find a lower rate, we match it and give you 25% off that stay. >> a boat from cuba with 12 adults and the child sank. >> his mom risked his life for him to get liberty. >> why take him back? it's his mother's will to be here. >> the community had threatened

mass protest and violence. >> we were all ashtonished. >> what did you do to this boy? [speaking foreign language] >> i'm sorry, i don't understand. ♪ your allergy pills? flonase sensimist relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist.

>> laura: now, a white house whistleblower named trisha newbold claims the trump administration shouldn't have --

now, as a result, klein, who isn't a political appointee, has had his name dragged through the mud and has been subpoenaed and has had to hire a lawyer. so, are democrats really in favor of smearing a career civil servant because of their hatred for president trump? joining me now for the first time is his attorney robert driscoll. huge legal bills. i have never heard of carl klein. i don't understand what's going on here. explain. >> carl klein worked in the security office. he was 25 years in the military, 18 years civil servant, doing nothing but security clearances for all but two of those years. he's not a political appointee. the democrats were doing an investigation where they want to get in the fbi files. and so, they're alleged that somehow this career civil

servant is the reason that they can get into these things. and so, they subpoenaed him personally before the house. and now he's got a compelled deposition, even though i offered in a letter on monday morning to appear voluntarily. >> laura: so, why do they go through the rigmarole of -- >> the white house has a disagreement on scope. the white house doesn't think they should have the personnel files on everybody. but it's not my client's problem. he worked for the white house. he no longer works there. and he will answer what he's allowed to answer and he won't answer what he's not allowed to answer. >> laura: does he know this trisha? >> they worked in the same office, yeah. he was her superior. the way this all works is -- >> laura: oh, i didn't realize they were in the exact same office. now it makes sense.

she's calling out the boss man. eight years of obama. through during clinton? >> but he's been doing security clearance issues for his entire career. the way the process works, when a white house employee file goes in, a line person looks at it, a supervisor looks at it. and she was below carl in the chain of command and she was upset about some of the decisions he made. >> laura: she seems like a disgruntled employee. i'm just surmising she had some disciplinary issue. i know it was a two-week deal. >> respect the process, novel concept. he will be cleared of that eventually. but all of this is just dragging a career guy in for no reason.

>> laura: they're not trying to embarrass trump. they just want to process that work. >> this is an inverse infusion gps. here they create a fake investigation to do research. >> laura: that's so genius for them to do but so nefarious and so not cool. >> there's no legislation can pass that can affect it. well, what it's going to lead to is the democrats getting hold of files and going through them for all the high-profile people they want and leaking it to the media. >> laura: leaking personal information. >> look what happened to the whistleblower. >> laura: unbelievable. this made it so much clearer for us. thank you so much. we really appreciate it. we'll keep in touch with you after his congressional appearance. all right. i want to dig in a little more on something i touched on a little earlier in the angle and

ask in question. is failed georgia gubernatorial candidate stacey abrams kind of the purest distillation of what the modern democratic party is about? well, it's about identity politics to them. >> i'm a black woman with natural hair and a sturdy build. and there are people who discount my capacity for leadership based on that. we have to acknowledge that. we can't ignore that's how people behave. the issue is, what do you do with that information? for me, it's lean into it. i talk about it. i also make certain you understand that i'm incredibly smart. i'm very capable. >> laura: and very modest, which is great. here now to react is a confident.ve author and film and this is what the democratic party must be about now. she's very clear on it.

identity politics. >> yeah. the old fdr democratic party under franklin roosevelt was ultimately about a division, but it was a different kind of division. it was a class division between the haves and the have-notes, the worker and the employers. the democrats have kept some of that but supplemented with identity politics. i think stacey abrams is giving a very benign picture of what this identity politics is, because there's a toxic side to it. let's remember, for example, that black nationalism came out of -- came as a sort of retaliation against white nationalism. malcolm x was asked why he was a black nationalist and he said to fight against the white nationalism that preceded me. but the inverse is also true, which is to say that black and latino nationalism is likely to

give rise to a revived form of white nationalism. i'm saying the democrats through identity politics are creating some of the very problems they pretend to deplore. they deplore the rise of white nationalism, yet they are doing more than anyone else to fuel those fires. >> laura: but they have to keep this going because there has been significant progress, there's significant gains, still much work to be done, no doubt about it. but you can't give trump credit for pretty much anything. you have to pull the credit out of people for criminal justice reform. but al sharpton said in his radio interview this week, we've got some unemployment -- it's gotten better, but we're still double that of whites. we still have less income as a family household matter of whites. it was down the line, then whites. that's how they're reading it and that leads to reparations, the need for that leveling of

the economic playing field through monthly payments of some sort, a perhaps given how that plays out. >> you see that trump is embracing the correct answer for this sort of identity politics. and it is to reject identity politics altogether and to embrace a sort of decent american nationalism in which all groups are given an opportunity and a chance to move up. i think this kind of american nationalism, which was the nationalism of lincoln and the american founders, this is the trump card, if i may say so, to beat identity politics. >> laura: yet they want to tag the word "nationalism" to match with white nationalism. so if you love your country and think it's worth preserving, our borders, sovereignty, our history, our historical markers, then you're tantamount as just a

white nationalist. but no, we love the country. we want to keep getting better. >> what's been hidden here is that white nationalism was invented by the democratic party after the civil war. it was the glue that held the south tightly to the democratic party. the very people who have poisoned the waters here with white nationalism are now pretending to be the solution to white nationalism. no, they created it and in a sense they've also created black nationalism. >> laura: thank you so much. great to see you tonight. and my friend's protest broke out all across the country to night with liberals taking to the speech to yell about attorney general bill barr of course. his harrowing and hilarious report next. oh! oh! ♪ ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar

and reached an a1c of less than seven and maintained it. oh! under seven? and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin

may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ ask your healthcare provider today

>> is trump our president above the law? is bill barr above the law? >> nobody's above the law. >> >> laura: it looked like a costume party there. aren't they lovely? well, we decided it might be fun to throw our fox news contributor into the mix and ask

them what they're so peeved about? >> this protest was to urge the release of the unredacted mueller report. well, it was a collection of mostly agent partisan government worker types. at times it felt like they were going through the motions, but we actually had some interesting conversations. watch, laura. >> we're not convicting people in a criminal court of law. we're investigating. >> investigation's complete, though. you're making it sound like the investigation's not complete. is it? is it the investigation complete? >> it's completely absurd just on the public evidence. >> so he's guilty of criminal collusion with russia and obstruction to justice. >> we deserve a right to see what's coming on. nothing the coming out? bill barr did not give anything out. >> tell me why you're here today. >> i think that it is incredibly important for our government to be as -- to share what they know

with us and share all the information that they have. and i think that refusing to release the report to the people goes directly against democracy. >> your thoughts on this economy and what trump has done to the economy? >> i mean, as far as -- i honestly haven't been paying that much to the economy. i'm a college student. so i don't have a full understanding of the economy right now. so, yeah. >> you have seen as well as i have the things that the president has done with our own -- with your own eyes. i mean, we don't have to say, oh my gosh, i need to see the report, to know there have been things which are not appropriate for a president to do. we have children in cages. we have -- help me out here. we have children in cages. we have disregard for the law in many circumstances. >> so you believe bill barr is in collusion with trump to cover up with investigation? >> well, he's hand picked by trump and he's not -- he's just

not doing what he should be doing to get the information out to the people. >> tell me why you're here today. >> to get the full mueller report released. >> what do you mean by the full mueller report? >> the full 400 pages that mueller wrote, unredacted and all the backup material. >> you want unredacted? >> unredacted as much as possible. >> it's illegal for them to submit an unredacted support because it's got grand jury testimony in there. you're waiting for congress to make the ruling? >> no, i'm waiting for 2020 to vote that [bleep] out of the white house. >> this was their last kind of hope, holding on that they could finally get this president, corner him. and i think when the barr summary came out and the mueller findings were in, they were very

deflated. so it was a halfhearted protest. >> >> laura: it looks a little weak. >> i really feared they were going to fracture hips before the protest was over. >> laura: the last time they protest it was like '74. get the servicemen out of nam. >> look, the last time i saw a protest this halfhearted, it was alyssa milano in the georgia statehouse. which i wrote a piece about on fox news, so you can look that up. i felt bad for the people. i really did. i did. >> >> laura: you felt bad for the people? what's wrong with you? >> when you see people chanting offkey, "we're going to get the mueller report." but then one man turns to jessica and i on our way out, and he said, "this is why we

lose elections." so, felt bad for them. >> laura: but the left can turn out big protests. they've done big, big protests. kavanaugh protests were big. >> if it's any indication of 2020, trump can start redecorating another part of the white house. this was sad. >> laura: i liked the student who admitted, i'm not familiar with the economy. i'm a student. >> or the lady, help me out. >> laura: stand there like a totem pole. say something. that was fun. with err going to be right back. stay there. non-drowsy claritin. and relief from symptoms caused by over 200 indoor and outdoor allergens. like those from buddy. [ dog whimpering ]

you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? most pills don't finish the job because they don't relieve nasal congestion. flonase sensimist is different. it relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. it's more complete allergy relief. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist helps block six key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. and six is greater than one. flonase sensimist. ♪ >> laura: all right, raiment, a special friday polys tomorrow. and it involves a special video [laughter]

>> i think we may have to retitle the segment that friday polys. and i'm not going to explain anymore. this is a painful bruising. shannon is going to kill us, the podcast go to apple itunes and you will love today's ipod. shannon bream, take it from here, shannon. >> shannon: i would never tell you guys because raymond is super entertaining and willing to do anything. >> laura: he falls off of the stage. he does shoulder massages and he's a renaissance man. >> shannon: these are g rated massages, this is all good stuff come aboveboard. >> i'm coming over in the break. >> shannon: raymond, we could use massages. the fox news alert, president trump heading to the southern border as he wants mexico's stop the drug trafficking or faced tariffs on cars coming into the u.s. a live