the hour has passed. by the way, so has the week. we'll be back monday, 8:00 p.m. the show that's the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. have a great weekend. with people you love. hopefully not electronically. dan bongino filling in for sean. >> welcome to a special edition of hannity, justice in america. illegal immigration crisis continues. and yesterday it was reported that the white house had proposed releasing illegal immigrants into sanctuary cities. the president commented on the report earlier. >> president trump: rather than moving the illegal immigrants to other parts of the country, first of all, we're getting them and we're doing the best we can with very bad laws, we have to change the laws. we're apprehending thousands and how sands of peep am day who

will bring the illegal, what do you call them, i call them the illegals, came across the border illegally, bring them to sanctuary city areas and let that particular area take care of it, whether it's a state or whatever it might be. california is always say being want more people. and they want more people in their sanctuary cities, we can give them lot, we can give them an unlimited supply. let's see this they're so happy. they say we have open arms, let's see if they have open arms. the alternative is to change the laws that we can do it very, very quickly, very easily. >> also the "new york times" report 245d president trump urged the acting secretary of homeland security to close the southern border despite having said he would delay a decision for a year. however, a dhs spokesman pushed back on the claim. and breaking moments ago, in a victory for the trump

administration, the liberal ninth circuit court has temporarily blocked the judge's order that would have stopped the trump administration from returning asylum seek source mexico. joining with us reaction is the white house principal deputy secretary hogan gibley. i'm curious about the proposal from the white house to move illegals into sanctuary cities, we can't detain more than 20 days for a family, i'm curious, i'd like your perspective, why aren't liberal governors and mayors out there celebrating, hogan, i mean they've wanted them in the cities, some of them proposing to allow them to vote. >> we have a crisis at our southern border, well documented on this show many times. donald trump predicted this, democrats mocked and derided him when he said we would see a record surge coming across the southern border. here we are, 100,000-plus last month alone. it is increasing on pace for over one million this year.

democrats' only solution, is to say let's make everything that's illegal legal. it's completely ridiculous, the president said, listen, i understand where you are, you aren't lifting a finger to help protect american families at all, you say you want open borders, democrats, you say that illegal aliens have a right to be here, regardless of the cost. so you need work with us, our administration, and come up with a way that we can transport illegal aliens, that will be released anyway based on democrat policies, into your communities. and your districts. and your state. that's the way it needs to be done. democrats say they want them in those cities and sanctuary cities which are set up as sanctuaries for illegal aliens. they say they want it, the president said fine, we'll put your money where your mouth is, we'll send them to your districts, tell us when and where to deliver them and we'd do just that. >> i find it puzzling that the left is making a legality argument this in favor of illegal immigration.

this ironic? is this escaping the left? one more thing, it's interesting, julian castro did a town hall on another network and referred the this policy as cruel. i suggested earlier, what's particularly cruel about it? i mean it's only cruel if you view illegal immigration as a burden, am i reading this wrong? his words, not mine. >> you are right. listen, they said it was to attack our political opponents, and it was wrong for us to suggest this. you should have kashg triegzed it as an olive bran too much work with the democrats. you say democrats that you want all of these illegal aliens to come into this country unchecked. we have to release them based on the laws you put on the books and you won't change. that's fine. logically, we would just work with you, ball games along the southern border, san antonio, san diego, el paso, yuma, we continue to release people into the same communities. it's a burden. the folks that don't work for government, the private

organizations, tell us we are overtaxed, we can't do enough from our charities to protect or help any of these people. we have to put them in place is a cross the country. the logical landing spot for so many of these illegal aliens are the sanctuary cities that democrats say they love, and they say they want these people to come into the country. illegally and unlauferl unlawfully. we're asking democrats, we're here to help you out, where do you want them and here ee april happy to take them there. >> it must feel like in the white house you guys and ladies are on an island, getting very little help with regard to what should every been a bipartisan issue establishing our borders. but have the democrats proposed to you, are they working with the white house on any, i mean this, any substantive proposal to ensure that people who come into the country do it by our laws, anything at all you can put of the for the audience? >> absolutely not. i've heard no particular plan at all from democrats. listen, they're choosing to

stand with hundreds of thousands of people who pour into the country illegally and unlawfully as opposed to 100,000 legal citizens. they won't address, this i guess it's political, donald trump is in the white house and they think they can get these people in the country and get them to vote for them one day. we see human smuggling, child smuggling, human trafficking, the drug cartels, they control the southern border. the situation is so dire and so sad, and democrats won't lift a finger to work with the white house to protect our people in the american communities. but also to stop this horrific practice of using children to come into the country illegally. we have arrested, or busted up several child smuggling rings in which they use the same child multiple times to send them back to, you know, el salvador, honduras, guatamala, to come

back up, they use them multiple times. it's a tragic circumstance down there and democrats won't do anything to stop it at all. everything they're doing incentive iceses more of this illegal, bad behavior. i can't understand why they won't do a thing to work with the white house, to protect american communities. their only solution is to let everyone come in here, not have a southern border, release them into your communities, into your schools, and into your neighborhoods. it's unacceptable. >> it's sad, hogan, the idea of enforceable borders used to be bipartisan. thanks for joining us tonight, hogan. >> absolutely. >> predictably, following reports, the mainstream media and the democrats lost their minds and had a complete meltdown. watch this. >> this presidency, and hissed a mshgs, is saying -- his admission is saying we're not interested in real solutions. what we are interested in doing is demonizing my grants.

it's against american value. >> it represents a sociopa think. he's truly representing a new low, if you will. >> president trump wants to use immigration, wants to use the border as a political weapon, as opposed to talking with democrats. >> he's trying to create fear. that's what he's trying to do, create fear among people throughout the united states about thesing my grants. >> it seems to be sort of the height, the culmination of much what we've seen, demuniization of people here illegally. >> here in new york state, new york law makers blocked a bill expand iing tuition aid fo gold star families. democrats said there are already generous programs, unbelievable, for children of military killed on the battlefield. they did not want to extend the program to cover noncombat deaths and injuries. they'll extend it to illegal immigrants. joining us with more is florida congressman matt gates, former

economic advisor ghuolsby, and tom holeman. at the southern border, i've heard your commentary, in the midst of an unprecedented crisis at the southern border. do you see with the ninth circuit opinion that rob broke, keeping people in mexico while their asylum claims are being recommend deed, is that going to help the situation? >> no, it's going to make it worse. ninth circuit ruling after ruling, what you spoke of earlier, that's work you'll never see by a federal court. that has affected this country in a bad way more than anything in the ninth circuit. it's support -- president trump took on the ninth circuit chief justice roberts, if there is evidence, it's no wonder why the aclu goes to the ninth circuit every time they want to fight the administration. terrible ruling, going to cause more problem to come illegally, more people are going to die and

more cities unsafe because of this ruling. a terrible ruling, terrible. >> austin, just from the democrat perspective, i have to tell you, you know, i enjoy your commentary, even though we have political disagreements. i'm confused, president trump suggested moving some illegal immigrants in the country with families they cannot detain because of the decree, to sanctuary cities where liberal mayors and governors told us that it adds to the economic wealth and the diversity. city, and illegal immigrants are a net positive. what's the problem, why are democrats objecting to the policy, why is it cruel to quote julian castro? >> i thought in general, i don't think that that would be cruel. if it were posed by president trump as the spokesperson for the white house said that, it was concession, i think they could reach some agreement. what i saw of the report was that donald trump was wanting to take the most violent or those

who were in detention and try to release those in nancy pelosi's district which would be both illegal and highly questionable. >> hold, on austin, i didn't see that report. just, if you allow me for a second, we were told that people crossing the border is not safety issue, we shouldn't to have worry about that, correct? >> overwhelmingly it isn't. if you purposely try to find one person that committed some criminal act and release them into the driveway of your political opponent, to me that feels a little disingenuous. >> but we were told it's not a safety issue, congressman gates, don't worry, open borders is not a safety problem. you have heard it multiple times, not only not a safety issue, it's not a crisis, nothing see her, everybody move along. your take on this? >> well, i don't think we'll be able to release anyone to nancy pelosi's driveway, nancy pelosi lives behind a wall.

we'd like to exthaend to the rest of the american people. it is outrageous. i represent the district hah has the highest concentration of active duty military in the country, i represent the gold star families. one of the things that service members worry about is what would happen to their children if they have to give their life on the battlefield. my grandfather used to say don't tell me what your priorities are, show me your checkbook and i can tell what you your priorities r new york state, it's all messed up, the fact they have to keep pouring money in to more entitlements for illegal aliens, what that does, dan, it builds a magnet that draws peep aim cross the borders illegally, it's bad governance. >> in your experience at the border, tom, you can't deny that incentives create an incentive for people to come to the country. do you think policies like this providing tuition benefits to illegal immigrants denying them to gold star families, almost, i'm almost answering the question for you, how bad is this? >> new york wants to know why

they have almost a million illegal aliens, ms13 problems, they entice them with free tuition, free healthcare. i grew up in a small town, upstate new york, home of the tenth mountain division, most decorated, most deployed unit in the army. i've been sur you are surrounded by those families my life. what the new york legislature did was spit on the people, finest one-half of 1%, who earned that combat. over 300,000 gold star families, i take offense they're attacking the gold star families, that's my home, people who live in new york, children go to school in new york, spouses work in new york, go overseas and pay the ultimate sacrifice and die for the country. in new york state won't take care of them like they take care of illegal aliens? illegal aliens got 10 times more tuition help than gold star family. if you aren't angry like i am,

there's something terribly wrong. >> austin, surely you don't support, this in your triage -- >> i don't support it. but you misrepresented what happened here. >> explain. >> just last week, the democrats passed a bill giving 25 dhou dollars a year tuition subsidies for the kids of gold star families. now, i think they should extend this. and the democratic governor and multiple democratic state legislatures also support it. they got into some goofy procedural thing that they already passed the budget, but this would cost additional money, that's why they wanted to hold it up. i think they should change that. they are not giving 10 times more per family to the illegal -- people here illegally. >> it's not misrepresenting it, if it's 10 times or not, why are they giving any, why giving any money at all? you're an economist, certainly you understand that.

>> well -- >> $27 million is ten times more than $2.7 million. it's more than -- disrespect the country, enter illegally, no respect for the country and we want to know why the border is out of control. because of democratic decisions like this. >> these are people that were brought here as children, they have -- >> 200,000 families unit coming across the border, your next daca in 10 years. these are the next daca. >> if you come over the border right now -- >> hasn't offered up one fifth of democratic leadership to slow the tide down. >> congressman gates, i mean -- >> i'm just listening. >> well, this is just so hard to believe when i originally saw the headline, i thought surely this is a farce. there is no way lawmakers would go on the record, you were there, in the state legislature, now united states congressman,

you would never sign their names to any piece of legislation or not sign to a piece to help gold star families while smumently supporting illegals. this is outrageous, horrible. >> i voted against giving in-state tuition to illegal aliens in the state of florida, i didn't think we wanted to create more enticements. what tom and most law men tell you when you talk about the new things that we're going to give children of illegal aliens, we end up getting more children of illegal aliens who are themselves illegal coming across the bore desh. one of the reasons why, now, 75% of the people presenting our family units, way up from previously. when we look at the crisis on the border, 3,000 people apprehended a day, that's just the ones we're catching, far more we don't catch. it's a consequence of the policy to create the entasements. what we need to do is crack down on sanctuary cities, impbls tut e verify, build the wall. we have a historic opportunity

under this president to finally secure the border. it should be nice if democrats today blooed the very same things -- believed the very same things they believed in the '90s, illegal immigration was a security threat to our country and we had to have borders to be a country. let's go back to that sense, we can argue then about what to do with the people here illegally. we can't even get their agreement to secure the border now and tom's right, that creates more problems for tomorrow. >> tom, one last word, i would be remiss if i didn't ask you, is there any chance, 15 seconds, that president trump's policy of putting illegal imgrants out on flores into sanctuary cities, is that going to happen? >> why wouldn't it? their policies are creating the surge at the border, why shouldn't they get the result of their failures? this president has done everything he can to try and secure this border. keeping his promise to the american people. i voted for six presidents, and no president has done more to secure the border than president trump. talked the talk, walked the walk. if democrats don't want to help

him they should see the results of their failures. >> appreciate it, to all of you. the mueller report expected to be released any day now. congressman mike turner, gregg jarrett, and sydney powell tell you who might be held accountable as this tanity special continues. feel the clarity... of non-drowsy claritin... and relief from symptoms caused by over... 200 outdoor and indoor allergens. like those from pollen, pets and dust. because new memories start with dusting off old ones. feel the clarity and live claritin clear.

the democrats are in deep denial. take look. >> amid an outcry from former national security officials who served in democratic and republican administrations, over

the unfounded accusation of spying. >> and it shows, i think, either a lack of understanding or willful ignorance. >> look, there's a robust tin foil hat community in the united states that truly believes that the government is spying on them. there's a deep state within the federal government. >> didn't back off that much, it's like a sean hannity script, if he wasn't doing hah what was he doing given there's no evidence for it. >> let's just say how very, very dismaying and disappointing that the chief law enforcement officer of our country is going off the rails. >> this is a transparent attempt by the top law enforcement officer in the country to make an insendry charge without a shred of evidence. >> evidence? unbelievable. how about using the phony fake discredited dossier to get a warrant to spy on carter page? the use of a human informant to

infiltrate the campaign. or the unmasking of trump a's associates. accountability is coming. let's listen to devin nunes. >> there's five direct referrals based on lying, obstruction of a congressional investigation, and leaking. we have a global leaks referral which involves just a few reporters but could involve multiple people. i don't think it's that many people, they probably only have a few sources within the agencies. then you have conspiracy referrals based on the manipulation of intelligence. the second one is based on fisa abuse and other matters. that's where we stand, those are the eight referrals at this point. >> dan: joining me for reaction is author of the russia hoax, fox news legal analyst gregg

jarrett, former attorney sydney powell, and congressman mike turner. greg, i'll go to you first, this has to be surely one of the low points for the american media, the evidence for spying, your book, what a time to have a book called "the russia hoax." they're calling us conspiracy theorists as they promoted the russia hoax. the evidence of spice and spy-like is smacking them in the face. >> as you showed with the clips the mel owe dramatic anger and hysteria underscores that, you know, the terrific derangement syndrome is in a sad dementia among the media and democrats. they were opoplectic that mueller determined no collusion, now they're doggedly determined to destroy anybody who dares to tell the truth about the russia hoax. i feel badly for barr, barr is telling the truth, look up in the oxford dictionary spying is

secretly collecting information, it can be legal, it can be illegal, human observation, listening devices, electronic communications, photographs, video, all of that is spying. we have the warrant application. james comey signed off to it. comey takes the cake, the pompous, preteenious inglorious, when he says i don't know what he's talking about when he talks about spying on the campaign. reminds me of comey saying i don't know what that word leaking means. >> he said it was court ordered as if he had nothing to do with it, as if they kicked down his door and said you must could this. congressman, i'll go to you, next. what i find fascinating about the euphemism game of spy versus surveillance versus informant, sean dave interest at the federal interest has an excellent tweet thread, with them calling everything under the sun spying. everything was spying. he has the actual headline.

it is funny that your democratic colleagues are the word police on spying. >> well, everyone watching certainly google the synonym for surveil ladies and gentlemen and it's spying. from brennan, clapper, comey their allegations of possible collusion between the trump campaign and russia resulted in surveillance and that is spying. i think it's important that attorney general barr said he'll look at the genesis of this investigation and whether or not things were improper. as we know from what has has been made public, hillary clinton paid, democratic national committee paid opposition research that was placed into the fisa court to get warrants to undertake surveillance which is spying. >> dan: sydney, you are a former federal prosecutor, you are familiar with the law and how it works. serious question, are we mischaracterizing the use of a fisa warrant, foreign

intelligence court warrant, to access people's data, phone, text, e-mail, also the use of a human intelligence asset, three people, two we know were working in conjunction with them, we don't know about clovis. are we mischaracterizing this in your experience as prosecutor? >> oh, no, dan, we're not mischaracterizing it. the democrats will continue to unravel because this is the first time they faced any measure of accountability in decades for their egregious abuse of poer and this entire fraud on the american people o top of that it goes back further than the fisa warrants. we must remember the decision of rosemary collier, the chief judge the fisa court who has found that comey gave illegal access to the raw database to three private contractors as early as 2015. would i bet money one of those was fusion gps and nelly orr

working for brennan and struk. when and where do you think this started. >> dan: what you said, for everyone out there to view, if you doubt any word that she's saying, april of 2017, that fisa court review, that indicates that access to private contractors is out there for everyone to look at. greg, i think, some was detacted but you can check it out. the next shoe is the mueller probe i think. the mueller probe that's getting left out of everybody's conversation on this, when did mueller know exactly that this collusion was a hoax? you and i knew two years ago. so did any rational, sent yint being. what was he doing for 675 do yous. >> he knew as early as december of 2017, which is about 7 or 8 months after mueller was appointed special counsel. he certainly knew a year ago from today.

so why the american public had to go through this agonizing investigation that to some extent debilitated and deterred the president's efforts to advance policy decisions, why mueller sat on at least that part of it, no collusion part, is really bee wildering and -- bewildering and confounding. it was commissioned by hillary clinton, the dossier, what it's all about. and it was advanced by two nefarious characters, christopher steele and glen simpson. steele was fired for lying and he's gone into hiding. simpson invoked the fifth amendment and has clammed up. it is a crime, really that, our nation and a presidency was held hostage by two individuals who con injured out of thin air a lie. >> . >> dan: and he hires andrew

weissmann, mueller, who's briefed in 2015 about the dossier. he knows the entire time. congressman, is congress going to push this, jim jordan, mark meadows and the good congressmen and women going to make sure justice is served in this case? >> absolutely. even congresswoman stefanik has a bill that would make who comey did inappropriate under the law, didn't follow the rules or protocol, they have to notify congress. if the mueller report found no collusion, then there certainly wasn't any collusion when brennan, comey, and clapper were looking at it and they run all over all of the cable news saying that they are themselves saw evidence of collusion. and it's absolutely not correct. >> dan: sydney, thank you to all of you for joining me. president trump responded to congresswoman omar's shameful comments on 9/11. we'll have reaction, stay with us.

welcome to fowler, indiana. one of the windiest places in america. and home to three bp wind farms. in the off-chance the wind ever stops blowing here... the lights can keep on shining. thanks to our natural gas. a smart partner to renewable energy. it's always ready when needed. or... not. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere.

to help the world keep advancing. this is jamie. you're going to be seeing a lot more of him now. -i'm not calling him "dad." -oh, n-no. -look, [sighs] i get it. some new guy comes in helping your mom bundle and save with progressive, but hey, we're all in this together. right, champ? -i'm getting more nuggets. -how about some carrots? you don't want to ruin your dinner. -you're not my dad! -that's fair. overstepped.

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

special edition of han yipt, justice in america. congress wouldman omar described 9/11 as some people did something. her embarrassing comments causing a new rift within the democratic party. the usual suspects will stick up for their fellow radical no matter what. >> we are getting to a level where this is an inassignment of violence against progressive women of color. if they can't figure out how to get it back to policy we need to call it out for what it is. this is not normal. >> i'm not for policing people,

that's what they're doing to women of color. this is a diverse class. they have never had so many women. this is not just a congress that looks differently but we serve differently, talk about the issues differently. >> dan: top level democrats are blasting the freshman congresswoman, watch this. >> insensitive, and it's offensive. on 9/11 radical terrorists attacked you see, new york city lost thousands of people. there's a lot of pain, in memory of 9/11, that pain isn't going anywhere. >> those staples were not only hurtful to me but extremely hurtful to everyone that was personally impacted by the terrorist attacks. no one should refer to what happened on 9/11 with terrorist attacks that killed thousands of americans as something by some people. >> dan: even president trump weighed in on the controversy on twitter today, posting this video with the caption, we will never forget. here's part of it, viewer warning, it contains some

disturbing to theage of the 9/11 attacks. >> it was founded after 9/11, they recognized that some people did something. >> you have no idea -- >> another plane just hit. >> some people did something. >> oh my goodness, there is smoke coming out of the pentagon. >> some people did something. >> dan: the congresswoman is remaining defiant, tweeting, quote, the people and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear us all soon, quoting george w. bush who she believes is downplaying the terrorist attacks. what if he was muzzled? and as a reminder, congresswoman omar still sits on the foreign affairs committee. joining me with reaction, new york congressman zeldin and tammy bruce. of all of the ways to describe a very unique horror in the

history of our country, up there can pearl harbor and mass murder on our soil, the imagery fresh in the minds of many. is there a more insensitive way to describe it than she did some at what point do you acknowledge it was horrendously worded and move on. >> it is an attempt to completely erase the reality of what occurred. to diminish it. it shocked -- her comments shocked the conscience of everyone for the most part, right? it was a shocking statement. it is unconscionable. and for me, and i want women in power, but what that requires is taking responsibility, owning your positions, owning what you say as opposed to deflecting. and then blaming other people. that is what children do. and i fight against all the time, as we all do, the efforts to infan tallize women, especially women of color, representative omar seems to be

infantlizing herself. the refusal to take responsibility, to in fact demand other democrats take this approach in her dismissal of that. that speaks to her belief. and i think we should take her seriously, absolutely. and she should take seriously that she shocked the conscience of this nation and if everyone in the western world who knows what that attack was and what it has led to. this is her responsibility. and of course in the process, the democrats, have to deal with what this means as well. and they're going to have to decide who they have become and americans certainly the democratic party base, is going to have to decide if this represents them and if it is appropriate if they accept it. >> dan: congressman, i'm stunned, the lesson of the mid-term elections i thought for the democrats, they were being reasonable, is that moderate candidates, connor lamb types, performed well in swingy type districts. do they really want to run in the house of representatives on

re-election on ilhan omar's comments? congresswoman has a history of making in some cases openly anti-semitic comments and refusing to back down. this cannot possibly be of any political advantage for the democrats in these upcoming elections. >> but instead of speaker pelosi leading the radical left she's being led by it. if she knows better, if she wants to stay as speaker, she wouldn't be elevating and empowering and embracing the anti-semitism, the pro bds, anti-israel hate by putting her on the house foreign affairs committee. this is some one who requested leniency for fighters, blamed u.s. foreign policy for the al she bab attacks. as we're talking about the latest comments made this week, by the way every single day this week there were new comments. this is just another week. they started off with just another monday. what happened this morning from omar, you can call it the mother

of all false equivalencies, trying to tie in president bush's speech he gave with the firefighters. they need to be held accountable. and you play a clip, remember what she said on opening day, when congress started, she said impeach the, i'm not going to repeat it on air. and comparing the president to hitler. she needs to police her own. she's going to be held accountable. hopefully for the sake of our country not speaker come january 2021. >> and remember, also, there's a videotape, and this is not even about disagreements really on policy. this is very bizarre at this point that should concern us, including a videotape of her mocking the american reaction to the names of al qaeda and hamas. >> i saw that. at one point laughing. >> laughing about it. this is strange. we can agree to disagree on tactics and how we reach our policy positions.

but representative ocasio-cortez also defending when there clearly is a very disturbing aspect to this, and i think, especially for the districts that they represent, those people and those districts deserve genuine representation that is serious. and these women, i should -- should be answerable to the constituencies and i hope the individuals there should have alternatives to be able to vote for somebody else. remember, with connor lamb, he did not have a primary opponent during the mid-terms. that is why he was able, i think, to move through. when you have got individuals who have opponents then i think some of the truth of what they represent eventually comes out. >> congressman, this new, you're inciting violence lane, alexandria ocasio-cortez jumps

to her defense, is becoming the new "you're a race interest" the democrats don't mean it it's just meant to suppress speech and shut down conversation. i find this really objectionable, when we make substantive comments about ridiculous absurdities like omar said, they jump down our throats, we're inciting violence while the left is engaging in violence on college campuses and saying nothing in many cases. >> right, dan, where we make no reference to race, religion, or gender well call us racist, sexist, islamophobic. we're having a problem with the double standards. if omar were a republican we would be naming names, boalted out of the foreign relations committee. the double standards, moral equivalency, hold the leadership accountable. if i wanted to raise everyone's taxes, the house republican steering committee wouldn't put me the ways and means committee.

if i wanted to undercut the u.s. military, if i wanted to handcuff our generals, the house republican steering committee wouldn't allow you on the armed services committee. hold omar accountable and the people elevating and promoting it. >> dan: i got to run, thanks, great comments as always. michael avenatti all sorts of trouble, again, and a big update in the jussy smollett space. our legal team is up next. ♪ turn up your swagger game with one a day gummies. one serving... ...once a day... ...with nutrients that support 6 vital functions... ...and one healthy you. that's the power of one a day. ♪ metastatic breast cancer is relentless,

but i'm relentless too. mbc doesn't take a day off, and neither will i. and i treat my mbc with everyday verzenio- the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. in fact, verzenio is a cdk4 & 6 inhibitor for postmenopausal women with hr+, her2- metastatic breast cancer, approved, with hormonal therapy, as an everyday treatment for a relentless disease. verzenio + an ai is proven to help women have significantly more time without disease progression, and more than half of women saw their tumors shrink vs an ai. diarrhea is common, may be severe, and may cause dehydration or infection. before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection. verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. serious liver problems can occur. symptoms may include tiredness, loss of appetite, stomach pain, and bleeding or bruising more easily than normal. blood clots that can lead to death have also occurred. talk to your doctor right away if you notice pain or swelling

in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain or rapid breathing or heart rate. tell your doctor if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include nausea, infections, low red and white blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. i'm relentless. and my doctor and i choose to treat my metastatic breast cancer with verzenio. be relentless. ask your doctor about everyday verzenio.

>> dan: welcome back to justice in america, i'm dan bongino, in for sean hannity. big implications for the justice system. one-time media darling and cnn star michael avenatti, hit with

a 38-count indictment, could put him behind bars for 335 years. accused hate crime perpetrator jussy smollett, going to be reviewed by the cook county inspector general. the ongoing saga of the college admissions scam, a fraudulent test taker plead guilty to conspiracy charges and money laundering. lori loughlin is said to be freaking about going to the big house and what that would could to her daughters. joining us to talk about these blockbuster legal case, attorney rebecca rhodes, mark iglarce and darryl parks civil rights attorney. rebecca, this case with the varsity blues, college admission scandal has everyone's attention. what is lori loughlin doing not taking a plea? is her lawyer not telling her? please, take the plea, you're dead on rights. >> i can't imagine. as you know, you have sat in the

room with so many perpetrators, i can't imagine anyone isn't begging her to take the plea. felicity huffman, took the plea. she admitted the guilt, she said i'm sorry, i apologize to students who my children took the place of. i mean she has been very gracious in light of the fact accepting the guilty plea, accepting being guilty. in this case i don't know what is happening. there's wire evidence, there's information, there's recordings, recordings of her sending money, there's information of her sending the money to, you know, the charity, the hoax charity. i mean, this is very clear cut from what we understand. there's not really any coming to an innocent verdict from a court of law. it's not going to happen. >> dan: i don't get it. mark, i don't get it, given your legal expertise and your experience at trial, i know

you've probably had clients who thought they knew better than you and finally you talk sense into them. do you have any explanation, everybody is innocent until proven guilty, i understand it's allegations. but the allegation are serious. publicly released evidence is pretty overwhelming. am i missing something here? >> i'm going to say that her lawyers are hopefully advising her correctly but she lives in an ulterior universe one that causes this type of activity, allegedly f i was representing her would i go to the closest foot locker, get the best pair of running shoes and have a run to the prosecutor's office, begging for some type of resolution, short of another indictment which she's facing because she failed to run to the government's office and beg for leniency. >> dan: you know prosecutors are human beings like everyone else, they must know at this point, they must see this as being spiteful. i'm not saying anyone is acting

unethically, but the evidence is overwhelming something happened here. >> and they also see, by the way, they see the footage on tv of her not walking into court, but her signing aument graphs, waving like she's on the cat walk, smiling and taking it all in. it was the worst p.r. i've ever seen. i don't get it. >> dan: darryl, your opinion, the evidence in the case, the innocent until proven guilty, we get it. but i think this case is fascinating, a lot of people know aunt becky from "full house" who possible motive would she have for holding out, ig norjs of the federal due jishl system? what advice would you give to her? >> well, without question she didn't serve herself well, she should have plead early in the case. her delay, given the reason she gave for the delay really weren't well served for her. i agree whole hortd heartedly, she needs to get this resolved with the federal prosecutors asap in massachusetts. >> dan: on the jussy smollett

case, another puzzling one, overwhelming amount of evidence he was not impacted, with the maga hats, carrying bleach coming from subway. instead of taking the loss and coming out publicly and getting good legal advice, this might be the bad legal advice, what does he do? he comes out and doubles down and he threatens them, the prosecutor and everyone else, for defaming him. am i missing something, is in another case of horrible vision? >> clearly, no attorney would possibly advise jussy to do any of this, to say any of this. any attorney, with any law school experience, and legal experience, could be out one year, please, jussy, go quietly into the night. thank them all very much, and keep moving. now, today, we have the head prosecutor saying she welcomes an inspector and a report for investigating her prosecution. okay, let's see what happens now.

because now the drama continues. now, it's not only jussy being difficult, it's the police department being out a lot of money, over $100,000. this is, i mean -- >> dan: quickly, any chance this $130,000 -- mark, ten seconds, any chance that the city gets this $130,000 back, i'll take you and darryl quick. >> yes, without question they should get their money. >> yes. >> dan: we'll see. thanks, guys. appreciate it. we'll be right back with final thoughts and hannity special. feel the clarity of non-drowsy claritin and relief from symptoms caused by over 200 indoor and outdoor allergens. like those from buddy. because stuffed animals are clearly no substitute for real ones. feel the clarity. and live claritin clear. the matters.ar... introducing the all-new 2019 ford ranger,

it's the right gear. with a terrain management system for... this. a bash plate for... that. an electronic locking rear differential for... yeah... this. heading to the supermarket? get any truck. heading out here? get the ford ranger. the only adventure gear built ford tough. always a catch. like somehow you wind up getting less. but now that i book at hilton.com, and i get all these great perks. i got to select my room from the floor plan... very nice... i know, i'm good at picking stuff. free wi-fi... laptop by the pool is a bold choice... and the price match guarantee. how do you know all of this? are you like some magical hilton fairy? it's just here on the hilton app. just available to the public, so... book at hilton.com and get the hilton price match guarantee. if you find a lower rate, we match it and give you 25% off that stay.

my dream car. if you find a lower rate, we match it and give you it turns out, they want me to start next month. she can stay with you to finish her senior year. things will be tight but, we can make this work. ♪ now... grandpa, what about your dream car? this is my dream now. principal we can help you plan for that .

>> dan: welcome back to the special edition of hannity, justice in america. unfortunately that's all the time we have left, it's been a lot of fun. thanks for tuning in. if you like tonight's show, pick up a copy of my book, "spygate,

the attempted sabotage of donald j. trump." sean will be back on monday, have a great weekend. laura ingraham is up next. >> laura: laura ingraham, this is the ingram angle from washington. last night we explain idea obama intel jim clapper was angry about attorney general bill barr confirming that the trump am pair had, indeed, been spied upon. he wasn't the only one. and tonight is jim comey's turn in the barrel. plus the democrat congressional hearing were a farce from beginning to end, all of the embarrassing moments you know you missed them, and the hi liarious clapbacks coming up. what's behind the religious war against vice president pence? don't get it.