>> martha: greg, thank you. apparently able to save the relics and the artwork inside. that is the story on monday night. we will see you in new york tomorrow night 7:00. tucker carlson is coming up in washington, d.c. good night, everybody from bethlehem. ♪ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *> > martha>> good evening and welo tucker. an island in the middle where notre dame for 850 years a living symbol of christianity, france, western civilization itself, all but melted down, steeple toppling on live television. there you have the pictures, the final damage is still being assessed tonight, but it looks to be a near total loss. the interior of the cathedral famously called the forest on the 800-year-old timbers ignited

like a tinderbox. chris calendar in the studio. >> the reason they call it a forest, tucker 52 acres of timber, some eight or 900 years ago that is what it took to build this thing, 800 years ago and the timber come of course drying for that long so when this went up a tinderbox for all intensive purposes. it happened a little after 6:00 p.m. paris time and you can see the smoke coming up out of the cathedral and people were wondering what the smoke was and then minutes later, you look at the pictures and you can see the flames, the smoke had gotten much darker. the firefighter say they were actually there as soon as the workers because they are now in the process of renovating where they were renovating the fire. the workers where they are and the firefighters trying to bring them out, but the problem was, there was no resources which is because the people in the scene

said it was unbelievable that you had this thing burning. and you see that notre dame actually on an island. there is a river that runs by the back of the property. so wonder was, why wasn't their water pushed or pumped on this thing? and for some reason, 30 or 40 minutes, they struggled to be able to get some water on this. they actually considered using helicopters like we see in wildfires out west to dump on there, but the concern then would be with there be enough water to put the fire out and would it do more damage? they thought about bringing in the tinkers which we see in firefights out west, but the question is that's not a sign and a big tinker to come through to drop this water and doing damage not only to the building but some of the people who work around their so by the time they got there, allf this would come of the entire cathedral going down and they were saying later, they had no idea if they were going to be able to put the fire out.

period. >> tucker: to be clear, it is a loss. the cathedral -- the cathedral, we can't, so the elimination ofe number of places. the two things to be clear from your reports, the two things at this hour that we really don't know and maybe we should, how did this happen exactly? there is speculation we don't know if it's right it's right. >> trace: we don't. >> tucker: and we don't know why, firefighters benefit of every doubt, but we don't know why the response of the delayed, do we? >> trace: the firefighters were pushing back saying they were there minutes after and the witnesses said yes, they were on the scene trying to get people out. what we don't know why weren't the resources they are? why didn't they have a tanker? why didn't they have the water being pumped on question we do not know. what we do know there was renovation going on up top. we know there was construction and that very area of the fire

started. we don't know if that was the cause at all but we know one could potentially lead to the other. we also know if you look at these pictures now inside, you are talking about if you've ever been inside this amazing structure, you have 76 of those paintings. they are 4 feet tall. they are everywhere in the ceilings, walls, windows magnificent in their own right. those are gone. now the concern is, we lost the artwork. we lost the oregon come at the heritage but did we lose the artifact? by that, did we lose the things that were in the volts below and not only the plans of the cathedral itself but also some of the early architectural plans of the city? they were locked and they are. that is the question now, how much of the heritage did they actually lose in the fire because it really was devastated? devastating to catholics because it's good friday, easter sunday. the two holiest days on the

christian calendar, dozens, i'm sorry, hundreds of thousands would have celebrated mass this weekend. >> tucker: horrifying, thank you very much for that. well, the fire you have been watching is in some ways metaphor. the broader decline of christianity in europe. the decline has been's swift with consequences. mark steyn starting this question 40 years and we are glad to have him with us tonight, mark thank you for coming on. there is one that i cannot get out of my mind, we haven't built anything like notre dame cathedral in the west in so long. we don't build things that are beautiful anymore. only by design. will there ever be anything like that ever again? >> mark: i think we have lost the knack. notre dame is about a ten minute walk from the pompidou center name for the late pompidou and that is one of the dash almost like any modern building in

paris, that is one of the ugliest things you've ever seen. and when you go back eight and a half centuries to the time when this building began construction, it took a century for the first part of it to be completed. the man who set to work on this new they would not see it finished in their lifetime. but their sense of a transcendent meaning to life was so strong, that the idea of building the most beautiful building to the glory of god, they took naturally in a way that we don't anymore. >> tucker: well, and that, of course, the reason they built buildings like notre dame and the first place. not just for the amusement but to glorify god. this is not, let's be clear, not speculating that because of the fire, you know, it happened as chris gallaghetrace gallagher, d

it is not the only church that has caused caught fire in franc. if you desecration's of churches but give us a skill of what's been happening? >> mark: in retreat in europe, and in france particularly come up france has quite an aggressive belief in secularism and according to some polls, the french or even by the standardsf the molten west world to come most godless people in that sense. three years ago and that terrible summer that began with the knees truck killings. the entire french was unraveling, i went to the cathedral for the paramount, the french priest who had his throat cut at mass. and then the basilica of saint-denis', and the north of

paris where the french kings of buried. and basically a christian museum and the heart of what is now a muslim suburban in effect. there is no sense of christianity outside of the walls of that cathedral. it was after that that i went to notre dame because you do have the sense that a living, breathing faith is just becoming actually come a museum. an art gallery. a storage facility. and the french who were on the streets of paris, this evening. they are not morning just history or architectural art or cultural. they are mourning something else. but what that something else post-christian france can't quite identify it. that is really the conundrum. when he says we will rebuild it,

for what? when people talk about the heart of france has died? what is in the soul of france? what is this? is it just the building or something more. >> tucker: and so specifically as you well know, it was desanctified, d christianized during the french revolution for a time and was made a secular temple, but then immediately reverted to what it always was, which was a christian holy place. do you think there is any hope in something like that will happen again in france? >> mark: you never know how these things will go. everybody knows the hunchback of notre dame, the novel, quite a lot to restore the importance of notre dame in the minds of the french people. but michelle well back a controversial notable list, a summation which poses that

france elects a muslim preside president. and he knows the single character knows this will mean something. and he actually makes a conscious effort to try to recover his lost catholic faith. and those are the kind of pilgrimage, and he has moved by the music. he is moved by the ritual. but he can't quite make the final step and reconnect with god and the catholic faith. and that seen in that book is in a certain sense the question raised by this fire tonight. is it a hole in the soul or a missing building burned to the ground? >> tucker: has it made it a better society of christianity? >> mark: no, it has not. you have to believe in something. >> tucker: thank you. >> mark: thanks a lot, tucker. >> tucker: good to see you. three days from now the weight will be over the department of justice announced the mueller

report will in fact be released to the rest of us this thursday. it has been three weeks the attorney general william barr released his first summary of the report that exonerated the president and his tap from claims they colluded with the government of vladimir putin. since then, diehard conspiracy notes have suggested that william barr lied in his summary because he's in on it too trying to help lattimore -- vladimir pn and the payment apparently. so we will find out very soon but that they were right or not. we will have the complete report the moment it drops with the exception of the reductions and if those people are wrong, do you think they will apologize? we are going to ask them to. up next, for years democrats at the american should welcome every migrant legal or illegal, but since president trump offered to grant them their wish, they have been strangely unexcited about it. what is going on? we will tell you after the break

♪

♪ >> tucker: so former obama advisor, has a new book out. you didn't know that. you were not alone. nobody knew that. the book is called finding my voice and, just honest, not even in the top 1,000 on m amazon amp barnes and noble, no reviews like four reviews. not selling copies and the amazing part

"the new york times" put it 14th on the best seller lists. so a book that sold no copies made "the new york times" best seller list. so the book industry spoke to the news foundation and described as inconceivable. so when conceivable in fact that only one expect nee -- expectation fraud. the companies by an author's book for a fee in order to guarantee best seller status. we're not saying that happen, we are just strongly suggesting that it must've happened. until now, the accomplishment life with friends with michelle obama but now a new achievement, best-selling author, congrats. for years, democratic leaders have fought against securing the border. they passed sanctuary city laws with two kinds of people in the world, effective americans who live here and the superior future americans who have the rest of the planet should be allowed to come here swiftly as possible.

if you disagree, by the way, you are a bigot. this writer worked until something unexpected happened, the president threatened to agree with them last week he said he's ready to give them exactly what they've been demanding illegal immigrants fresh from the border as many as possible bus to their front doors like a package from amazon. you think they would be thrilled. but they weren't. they were angry. they said trump would dump immigrants on them, dump like used cars and tires in the woods. an interview with cbs news, presidential candidate cory booker accuse the president of something sinister. watch this. >> i think he's trying to pit americas against each other and make it less safe. >> so you take this seriously? >> i take this, he is injecting fear into the country. so he was looking to solve the problem, he wouldn't do things to divide the country against itself. >> tucker: wait a second, wait

a second to those following at home. did you catch the word from senator booker from new jersey who went to yale law school way smarter than you? bringing in illegal immigrants would make us less safe. that can't be true because he told us illegal immigrants are more law-abiding than you are. "new york times" and how can bringing immigrants pit each other against each other if they work hard and grow the economy? it sounds like bigotry talking. is senator booker a bigot? what about share, a liberal actress/singer. i understand that helping struggling immigrants but my city of los angeles is not taking care of its own. what about 50,000 citizens who live on the street, people who live below poverty line and are hungry? if my state cannot take care of its own and others' vets, how can it take care of its own? the virus is spreading?

is cher a bigot too? what is going on? we are joined by richard who has come on tonight. >> thanks for having me. corey booker said and it is confusing to me from attempting illegal aliens into the city will make them less safe, how can that be true? we know from him and everybody else that they actually make us safer? >> richard: the libertarian group that did the research that said by undocumented immigrants commit crimes at lower native americans so pick it up with them but not me or liberals. >> tucker: i'm actually taking up with them 20 times but i'm interested in poker. and cher. and less likely the core of the

economy and most americans among us, white and the world would you be calling them garbage to make the city's more dangerous, senator booker adjusted. >> richard: he's not calling them garbage. >> tucker: he's dumping them. >> richard: the pregnant -- the president's signature with mexico to pay for the wall to cp all of this from being an issue. he failed on that. it is counterproductive and remember people saying i one a trip to disneyland so all expensive paid trip to a great city. they would never even dream of getting there, but -- >> tucker: but hold on. for 40 years we have taken refugees and moved them into rule and poor america but wh not pacific heights in san francisco? why don't we? i'm sincere. every time they come, they go to bethlehem, pennsylvania, why don't we send them into where zip code? and then to nantucket?

i'm not joking. >> richard: because i think president trump is talking about dissenting thousands of people with no job, no family connections, no resources, and then having them go into a community where they have no roots, no nothing. so of course -- >> tucker: with millions of people every decade you have a totally different country basically. no one cares. >> richard: if you said 10,000 or a hundred thousand people from norway or north dakota to pacific heights commit would beo having nothing to do with the color of their skin so i think cory booker -- >> tucker: hold on, wait a second, you are breaking my argument and god bless you for doing that. i believe what you said. it's not about race but the pace of change and why should they have to handle it? i agree with that, white nationalist for sending up but you are right. but i'm asking why don't we have the same about the rest of the

country that is getting this imposed on them and nobody cares? why don't they care? >> richard: the problem, tucker the president tried this 2018 campaign with the care of vein -- caravan and it didn't work. ms-13, his election day tied to losing by nine. this is a tactic the president is trying to vacate down the escalator and election day 2020 and everyday in between. and it's unproductive. >> tucker: politically it's unproductive. >> richard: that is the other problem. >> tucker: you are right of course, but maybe it makes us more compassion for the country that don't live in the zip codes we do, coastal zip codes. they complain about immigration, maybe they just want control over what happens to their town. >> richard: and i think comprehensive immigration reform is essential. that is what the president is

trying to accomplish. go back to 2013 deal with lindsey graham supporting it, that is a basis for -- >> tucker: right. this is not that. >> richard: and less you offer him a deal. >> tucker: you are coming closer to the answer. i appreciated. >> richard: you got it. >> tucker: the state of california has a lot of problems with the program, san francisco and los angeles have enormous homeless population, drive through and you will see it. one in five california's live in poverty the highest rate in the country. thousands of middle-class residents flee every year. and the fastest growing places in the country but fear not, the governor newsom is taking ambitious three day poverty tour to learn about people and what he can do about it. he's always been rich so he needs to do a little reporting on the subject but wait. it turns out he's not doing the tour in skid row or stop turn or

central valley but instead guatemala it and el salvador. he's they were to learn about the areas troubled including poverty and crime. to find about what california can do to help, california can do to help other countries work on their homeless and property related issues. imagine if he was focused on his state which he is supposed to be running. well, democrats a varies specific talking point -- point. ilhan omar inciting violence. and also new developments in the college scandal, it might grow. the responses are straight ahe ahead. ♪

♪ >> tucker: in 19022, two, ilhan omar came from a refugee camp in east africa, kenya.

three years later she received refugee status and five years after that a u.s. citizen. she has been attacking the united states as racist ever sense. according to omar barely a difference between this country and terrorist groups like al qaeda. in a interview omar complained there was a big difference between america and al qaeda, watch. >> when i was in college, i took a terrorism class. every time the professor said al qaeda, his shoulders went up. you know. you don't say america with insensitivity. england with intensity. you don't say the army with intensity. >> tucker: so she still feels this way and we know because she spoke to a group hosted by the council on american islamic relations care. while they are congressman complained america is bigoted

against muslims, second-class citizens, she said. no proof because of certain claims. for greater freedom in america than they do it islamic country on the planet. that is where they move here, millions and millions more would like to join them and you would too if you wear them congressman omar lives here and in somalia, but in america by the way an elected member of congress. could she do that in saudi arabia? no. is she grateful? no, she never stops complaining. she made this famous remark about 9/11. >> founded after 9/11, because they recognize that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties. >> tucker: some people did something. but we are the real victims. omar understatement had criticism with images of 9/11 attacks in case you forgot what

people did. late last week the president joined the criticism by tweeting this video. >> founded after 9/11 because they recognize that some people did something. >> you have no idea. >> some people did something. oh, my goodness, there is smoke at the pentagon. >> some people did something? >> tucker: a little over the top? acma may be. if you are ilhan omar you do not like that video. people don't like to be criticized, got it but would you feel criticized by that tweet? not unless you believe disagreement is the same as violence. and as it happens, does believe the disagreement is the same as violence or claims to believe that. all of a sudden people on television said trump is trying to her ill on omar. >> many are calling trump's

tweet and that video incitement to violence against the congresswoman. >> donald trump is trying to incite violence. >> this is all just incitement to violence. >> this is incitement to violence. the goal is inciting violence. we are getting incitement of violence. no question, is he inciting violence towards muslims? not only ilhan omar but muslims in the country. >> tucker: cory booker would say literally anything went further of course, the signature move when everybody else is saying something ridiculous, booker will triple down on insanity to be completely sincere about it. in this case, booker happy to blame trump for actual terrorist attacks. >> since 9/11, we have had terrorist attacks in this country. majority right wing extremist and the majority of those white supremacist attacks from synagogue and pittsburgh to a church in south carolina.

and these are white supremacist groups that use language as we saw as far away as new zealand. use the president's language as almost the license for the attack. >> tucker: i swear in 20 years, every fifth-grader will believe 9/11 was committed by white supremacist. totally true. you watch and heard it here first. they are the real threat. and that is what booker is sating. to prove it, demagogues from the left forever telling us what the academic of hate crimes in the country but they are lying. there is no epidemic of hate crimes, california the biggest date and the most liberal state and here are the numbers 2017 california convicted 65 people of hate crimes. 65 out of 40000000 people. by the way pure hate crimes in california and 2017 under trump then 1986 under the bill clinton administration. that epidemic is fake, propaganda and they are trying

to control you with fear. your opinions are violent, they say, your opinions are violent, disagreeing with me as though sold you must obey. that is what they are telling you. you can see why. this is where we come into it. if we go along with this and go to these demands it is over. if we let them define speech as violence, it has no meaning. they can tell you what to say and when to say it. they can use any force necessary to make you be quiet. just as you would do whenever you -- whatever you needed to do and whatever force to stop the terrorist attack. they are saying your opinions and terrorist attack are the same thing. this is a scary argument, and we should be afraid of it. dave rubin joins us tonight, dave, thank you so much. i thought immediately when i saw what they are doing. our people and came the implications of your criticizing a person committing an act of

violence by doing it? >> dave: of course we have to separate criticism of ideas from criticism of people specifically. you have to be able to criticize any set of ideas. a set of ideas, whether a political platform, say republican or democratic platform or religious set of ideas whether islam or christianity. by the way, this is what religious scholars have done for years. they rip apart the text and argue over the meaning of the text. you have to be able to criticize ideas. the main thing i was thinking while you were talking is that we live in a strange time where the same people who will call you a white supremacist, who will call donald trump a and 40% of the country deplorable's, racist or the buzzwords that you talk about, is that in incitement to violence? if you use their own logic against them fighting against and hitler, tubbs heard, aren't they the ones? and in fact, they are, i've had

violence at my house because of them. and yes, a big effect on my life and my family, but i'm not going to whine about it because i think debating the idea is the important thing. they use in a disagreement to shut down the debate. >> dave: if you look back the last couple of years the way this thing is tracked and i did tons of videos. first polling the political opponents and then you can punch a. and we can cite people and if you call somebody a nazi, what is next. you are absolutely right this is all we have left, and i've been traveling and talk to people about speech and all of these issues. everyone in europe, everyone in europe is jealous that we still have the first amendment. they wish they had the first amendment. this is what we must stand for it. someone who lived in new york 9/11 and i was in my early

20s, watching of the videos of the planes crashing, horrific come obviously but the dismissive -- dismissiveness, omar talking about it or just sort of shifts the way that youd feel about it, it's not about wt happened to the people actually died but what happened to her, it is so disgusting, really. >> tucker: is it also, kind of narcissism that is universal on the left now? all about me. i don't know, someone died. they are are orphans. no, but people look at me funny on the subway. maybe it's not about you for a second. >> dave: i think you are right, where people don't care about your feelings. the left absorbed if you feel about anything any given moment that is what is right. so the idea that taking positions that relate the same position as donald trump. it is because the chest board flipped and you can really, that is the thing you can get them to take any possession --

position. but someone that came from the left and i can't truly per say that i'm part of the left. we have to be able to talk about these ideas and by the way, don't go into politics if you don't want to be criticized. the way they send out the memos, at the exact same time, the politicians. >> tucker: journalists going along with this? toughen up. >> dave: it's like, wait a minute, you guys calling everybody. this guy come i wouldn't be sitting here if you were elected and that is the truth. it is in incitement? >> tucker: it appears to be. dave, great to see you as always. hollywood celebrities and business with huge sums of money to get their kids enter press enter prestigious schools. mike rowe's head attending these schools would be a waste of time if it was free. and he still wouldn't go, and he

joins us after the break. ♪ everyone's got to listen to mom.

when it comes to reducing the sugar in your family's diet, coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar. balanceus.org

♪ >> tucker: the two actresses with the varsity blues bribery scandal trying different strategies tonight. felicity huffman pleaded guilty already. glory law: choosing to fight the charges, chris gallagher tracking the. >> with the fashion designer, really didn't underestimate the serious charges they are facing and now, underestimating how motivated prosecutors are when they charge bribing their daughters into the university of southern california by having them designated as a recruit of the recruit team despite never

competing in the sport. a plea deal but they turned it down because mandatory jail time and then they got hit with another charge of money laundering with max sentence of 20 years and "people" magazine reporting at that point they wanted to negotiate the prosecutors took the deal off the table. so they had no choice but to plead guilty. that is significant because both charges carry 20 years each. first it offenders never get 20 years each bet prosecutors say possible four to six years. neither have commented on the allegations but even if this does not go to trial in prosecutors with an 11th hour plea deal, experts say she and her husband will serve years, not months on the other end, felicity huffman has pleaded guilty to boosting her daughter's s.a.t. scores and looking at may be a few months behind bars. now, there are reports adult students involved in the cheating scandal could face

criminal charges. that is on top of publications being rejected and potentially kicked out of school or even haven't their diplomas revoked. legal experts say it will be a lot more difficult to prove that students knew their parents were cheating on their behalf. but it gets more interesting as we go along. >> tucker: what a story, trace gallagher, thank you for that. >> trace: sure. >> tucker: every year american teeth -- colleges, passed in inn for many years but as a recent blues scandal shows people willing to spend still more my thousands even millions more to ensure their child gets a seat at a particular university. why is this? mike rowe has: -- called out colleges wasting time and money for the parents. a brand-new book called the way i heard it which you can preorder and you should which is amazing. but in the meantime he joins us

in the flesh, mike rowe joins us tonight. thank you for coming on. i've been wanting for the past two weeks to get your view of this college scale because it intersects with things you have been talking about for so long. what is your view? >> mike: the first and obvious thing i'm outraged and everybody is outraged. but you step back and look at it come i think it is fair to say what is most outrageous? what are we most angry about? cheaters are bad, cheaters are bad because people who cheat, get taken advantage of and that is just not fair. we get that. but rich cheaters seem to really upset us especially. and i think that is part of what has crystallized the outrage around the story is the fact that the people who most egregiously cheated had an awful lot of money. and for my money come as i step back to look at it, well, yeah, that is kind of disgusting,

but where is the outrage for the cost of college in general? you don't have to be rich or famous to believe that your kid is doomed to fail if they don't get a four year degree. millions of parents in the country right now, millions, who generally feel if they don't do everything they can to get their kid into a good school, they will fail if the kid. so where is the outrage for the pressure that we put on a 17-year-old to borrow $100,000? you know, so much of that pressure comes from their mom and dad. it is well intended but it is tragic. where is the outrage for the guidance counselors who say the best path for the most people just happens to be the most expensive? the politicians and the lobbyists exacerbate the same myth. and employers interviewing people with a four year degree. we set the table and a pretty self-evident way. when we scratch our heads, you

are exactly right. the cost of tuition has increased faster than inflation, but also faster than health care, faster than real estate, faster than food, faster than energy. never before in the history of western civilization has anything potentially important egregiously expensive. so college is expensive because we freed up unlimited pile of free money and told an entire generation we are doomed to fail if they didn't borrow it. that has happened in every single text bracket not just the top one. >> tucker: that is exactly right. so we really shouldn't be surprised as you just said, when people try to gain the system described to them as they want the most important as if the gates to success in america. why even now are when so many people know this system is a scam, so people -- so many few people sang so? >> mike: i think because stuck

in this binary box, this or that. right, blue-collar or white color, good job or a bad job. higher education or higher alternative education. when you only have two choices or you think you only have two choices, then you do one thing at the expense of the other. so for instance, you know we have talked about this before, but it just seems so clear now. when four year degree universities needed a p.r. campaign 40 years ago, they got one. but the p.r. came at the expense of all of the other forms of education. so it wasn't hey, tucker get your liberal arts degree because it will give you a broad base of appreciation for humanity. it was come if you don't go get that degree, you will wind up over here turning a ranch or running a welding torch or doing some kind of consolation prize.

so we promoted the one thing at the expense of all of the others. and that one thing just happened to be the most expensive thing. and so, look come i don't think the skills said is the mystery. a reflection of what we value. $7 million -- 7 million jobs available and they require training. yet we are obsessed not really with education, you know. what we are obsessed with this credentialing. people are buying diplomas. they are buying their degrees. it is a diploma dilemma, honestly. and it is expensive. it is getting worse. it's not just the kids holding the note. it is us. we are underwriting -- >> tucker: who are totally right and felicity huffman believed the nonsense she has been told for 40 years. we shall listen to you on this. >> mike: look, if you are welcome. >> tucker: thank you.

>> tucker: after a decade in the wilderness, the top of the call for to, tiger woods, and the prosecutors backing off on the human trafficking and nonsense against the patriotic owner of the new patriots. and barstool sports, joins us after the break. ♪

♪ >> tucker: four months since robert kraft was lured into a sting in jupiter, florida. and they tried to destroy robert kraft's life well into his 70s because they said human trafficking was taking place. now, prosecutor saying there is no evidence of that at all. just kind of made it up. so why are they continuing to go after robert kraft?

the founder of borrower stool sports, from the very beginning you said this was a framed child become a ridiculous but even you could not have predicted, i don't think the wholeness of the case against robert kraft. >> that it is insane and okays about anybody. but when it happened all you heard was sex trafficking, major charge of my headlines putting a siren on the ambulance and everybody look over here. three or four weeks later, nothing, no sex trafficking and i don't know why we are talking about it still. in and sank a soul the way around and unfortunately the cases like this, a lot louder than the noise. we haven't heard anything. the reason i want to talk about it is exactly that reason from a government agency destroys your life, humiliate you and the grandkids case and anyone you met oops, sorry, but where is the recourse? what can you do about it and why are people not punished for this? >> dave: they should be.

a bomb scare to put the cameras in there. we don't know, innocent people, people legitimate massages, 20-year-old girl they sued today, jupiter of police, you found us a 20-year-old girl and mother in massage girl getting a normal massage they paid for but the police watching this video for no reason? why? so absolutely insane and people for what, for what reason. >> tucker: to humiliate someone and some point in the media other than you who would say something about it. you see these hosts on other channels just sort of -- sort of mindlessly from the police depaf absolutely true. it is a race to make noise. >> dave: and then went dead wrong like you said, this guys him image you tarnish and absolutely nothing, where is the

recourse and the punishment? i mean, someone was dead wrong or multiple people dead wrong. the police, the prosecutor that looked in the eyes and said this is sex trafficking. just kidding, no evidence at all. well, based on what happened. >> tucker: exactly, it could happen to you. i have to get your view on tiger woods. 11 years. he wins his fifth masters. what is the take away from this? >> dave: i will tell you the take away but you might be surprised from a tiger -- tucker. i hate tiger woods and i thought he was a fraud human. not because of anything extramarital but i think he's a fraud. >> tucker: i get it actually. >> dave: i said he would never win the masters but i was the first guy and popped up my shoulder dislocating to say i was wrong, i can't admitted he is one of the greatest to ever do it. and if more people took that lead and admit he took a very big mistake and for years i said, tiger lepers, you're

wasting your time. he will never win. i was the first one, check my tweet, hands up i was wrong. that surprisingly is the message. >> tucker: i totally agree with you. and i applaud the bigness of your heart. >> dave: credit to me before admitting it. >> tucker: good for you. good to see you, man. >> dave: you too. >> tucker: before we go tonight, we are grateful for the people who watch the show but particularly grateful and call them out by name tonight for the friends in the 42nd clearance company currently deployed and kandahar, afghanistan. they have watched the show but bigger fans of them. we will want to salute them for what they are doing on circumstances that are not easy at all. there they are. thanks, guys. that is it for us tonight. we will be back tomorrow night 8:00 p.m.

>> the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. dvr it if you have the capabilities to do it and good night from los angeles. guess who is next, three guesses coming to craddick my sean hannity. >> all right -- >> busy news night, welcome to hannity, 9:00 p.m. on the east coast of the united states, 3:00 a.m. in paris, france, where notre dame continues to burn constructive between 1160 and 1260, the sentry's old cathedral survived the french revolution, two world wars and so much more but tonight as we watched earlier today has collapsed and much of the building has been destroyed, 870 years. one of europe's most iconic structures will never be the same, thankfully note deaths reported and the infernal yet to be determined, but to monitor the story closely and a