tomorrow night, 8:00 p.m. eastern, 5:00 p.m. pacific. but is it for us. we have good news for you. following this program promptly at 9:00 p.m. eastern time tonight from new york city, the financial capital of this country, a man called the sean hannity will be taking over. >> sean: are you really on los angeles? >> tucker: [laughs] i really am. >> sean: i have a dinner idea for you. have you eaten yet? >> tucker: no. >> sean: in-n-out burger. >> tucker: in-n-out burger? >> sean: eat it with lettuce instead of the barn and put a lot of animals. call it animal style. you have to know the code. best burger. >> tucker: i -- is the shake, is thatur approved? >> sean: just go eat it. enjoy it for you tell me tomorrow. >> tucker: [laughs] i will. i will text you tonight. thank you, sean. >> sean: welcome to "hannity." buckle up. busy night tonight by the radical socialist field, 2020 democrats as a dump to the fire

filled with hypocritical far less candidates who are willing toal do anything for power. we will have full coverage of this frankly now really disturbing field of politicians including one unhinged candidate, maybe you can guess who it is, who is ready to lock up american gun owners if they do not turn their weapons over to the federal government. w but first, let's turn our attention to a very important "hannity watch" as we investigate tonight the investigators. tonight, the tide is turning dramatically. after thursday of this week, the gig is up for the heent trump media mob, the democratic allies, who for over two and a half years have been pushing their tinfoil hat conspiracy c theories and outright lies about collusion. they don't know it yet, but it's done, it is over, it is k, finished. no collusion, no obstruction. yeah, there's going to be a few that cling to a few sentences, offer more lies, more fake news,

more fake legal analysis. in the end, they are forever exposed for the liars and partisan hacks that they are. they have put this country in danger. our constitutional republic in danger. on thursday, the mueller report will be released by the attorney general barr.da with only minor legally mandated reactions, and it will be what is the final nail in the coffin to the credibility of america's biggest pressure collusion conspiracy theorist. theyn don't know it yet. that includes so-called reporters from "the washington post" and "the new york times." they actually won a pulitzer prize in 2018 for perpetrating a hoax. that prize frankly should be revoked. i think it could be rewarded to the real journalists, the real investigative reporters that we have every night on the show and my radio show,re the people who have been right the entire time. all along exposing, layer by layer, every single issue i involving what is the biggest

abuse of power obstruction scandal in history. the only difference is, they have evidence that has been reported over the course of two years on this show. unlike c so many in the media m, we are not blinded by hate. we follow the truth, the evidence committee process. sadly, the same cannot be said about the media mob. they reported their anti-trump garbage, lies, propaganda, over and over again with their anonymous sources. of course, just doing the democrats bedding.an he tight at the hip. manufactures crisis. they will do a predictably one lastst time with all the phony lying outrage, they'll be able to manufacture. they want to bludgeon president trump, their goal all along, by any and all means necessary, and they have only one day left. by the way, breaking moments ago, sara carter's reporting that three of those democrats, congressman elijah cummings, maxine waters, and the cowardly adam schiff actually signed a secret pact behind closed doors

of traveling to target president trump and subpoena all of his financial and banking records. oh, by the way, which means more evidence. they've even moved on from collusion. this letter obtained by sara carter from congressman jim jordan, it is now raising serious concern over this secret agreement to take down a president. according to a congressional source, "this is not how committees normally operate. the democrats aren't interested in legislating. only attacking the president." sara carter will join us in a moment and give us that full report.ar that is with the president is up against and has been up against from day one. if thehe president cured cancer tonight and gave every american $5 million and adopted their sick agenda, they would still hate him. here's my prediction. when the mueller report is released on thursday, the same people that have lied all along, this is going to find something, anyone in the report to bludgeon they were president. it's not going to work again.

many on the left speculating that the 30 plus hours of testimony from former white house counsel donald mcgahn is going to be the linchpin providing the damning evidence of wrongdoing. let's do something the media mob want to do. let's take an honest look at truth and facts. we know for a fact the special counsel found no russia collusion between trump or anyone in his campaign. as a matter of fact, we have the quote from the mueller report right here. this is from the mueller report. "the investigations did not establish that members of the trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the russian government and its election interferencepa activities. "no collusion. we also know for a fact that three previous f investigations also cleared the president. when it comes to the claims that the president obstruction of justice, we also know that mueller did not charge the president with obstruction. we know that barr, rod rosenstein, the g.o.p.'s

nonpartisan office of legal counsel and, yes, and conjunction with talking to the mueller team, cleared the president from any charges. it's a fact that president trump did not hire mueller. they will say, he wanted to fire him, but he didn't. they said he wanted to fire rod rosenstein and jeff sessions. he didn't. he didn't impede any investigation. he didn't interview with general flynn's case, wishing that he wouldn't get in trouble and he got in trouble. as comey said, the president is right to fire him for any reason or no reason at all. did the president talk about these things? yep. did you talk about them a lot? yep. that which outcome of the democrats on mueller's team, firing sessions, rosenstein, hoping that general flynn, a 33 year military hero wouldn't get hurt. kind of 3 like all the deep stae guys. they talked an awful lot about things, too, like wearing a wire to spy on the president. they talked about trying to invoke the 25th amendment to remove a duly elected president.

they didn'tme do it but they tak about it a lot. so if a president expresses frustration, just like those fbi doj guys, about them being investigated are not getting their political by over a serious crime that he didn't commit, it's not obstruction. also, there is no content.so very important as it relates to the law. calling out the trump eating democrats we mueller appointed to probe this whole thing, that is not obstruction. frankly, that was the right thing to do. last but not least, firing comey, not obstruction. by the way, here's the good news, president trump summed it up perfectly when he tweeted out, "mueller, the ag, and the ag based on mueller findings on great intelligence have already no collusion, no obstruction. these crimes were committed by cricket hillary, the dnc, dirty cops, and others." investigate the investigators." which we have been doing. the tables i finally turned. this is their last rubber bullet. it will hit and fall to the

ground, and that's all over. "the wall street journal" calling for a grand jury. he is right. investigate factors that are in the deep state entities power. "the federal bureau of investigation is to recover its lost reputation -- by the way, i don't agree with that. not rank-and-file, upper echelon -- the first item on attorney general bill barr's agenda must be to make good on something that set off a frenzy when he proposed it last week. an honest accounting of the fbi spying." yes, they spied on drum. they did. many times. many ways. the attorney general has already vowed to establishim a team, thankfully, to investigate our federal government spying on the trump campaign. great article today by andrew mccarthy. he'll join us in a few minutes detailing some of this potentially illicit surveillanc surveillance, writing, "less than a year ago, we learned the obama administration had used a confidential informant just by coming to approach at least three trump campaign officials in the months leading up to the

2016 election, straining to find proof that the campaign was complicit in the kremlin's hacking of democratic emails." of course, andy mccarthy is referring to carter page, george papadopoulos, and sam clovis, who were all approached by an informant with the name of stefan halper. that is only the tip of the iceberg. trump campaign associate carter page was also electronically surveilled. by the way, can somebody teach comey what that means? after comey and others signed off onea that sweet an application, the bulk of information coming from the unverified, unverifiable, uncorroborated dirty russian dossier paid for by hillary clinton. let's not forget about the nearly 350% increase in unmasking requests by top obama officials in the election year of 2016. what did obama know. by the way, peter strzok and lisa page say all the decisions were made by lisa page.

i think susan rice has questions to answer, john brennan, clapper, creepy uncle joe. what do they all know, when did they all know it? soon we'll have the answers to these important questions. in a letter to the director of national intelligence. congressman mark meadows. 53 closed door testimony transcripts he made public. i'm sure jerry nadler will join them. other fbi and doj officials who were involved in the witch hunt, and it was, against donald trump, the free passage given of course, a get out of jay demott jail free card because they like hillary. they thought she should won 100 million to zero. yet she committed real crimes. a massive amount of classified material that was found on the

unsecured private server that was managed by the networks, and a bathroom closet, she committed a real crime, and thus had a real intent to obstruct justice by destroying the evidence ofob that crime. hence, the 33,000 deleted acid washed emails. the media on thursday, they are going to pretend they care about obstruction of justice. meanwhile, all of them will ignore the biggest slam-dunk obstruction of justice case in history. that's right, hillary's case. just like democrats, remember, they believed all the kavanaugh accusers. "i believe." their silence is deafening when it comes to lieutenant governor of virginia, oh, he's been accused of rape and violent sexual assault. where are all the "i believe er" charges of ceric's sexual assault only matters if e appointed by trump but not the f virginia. look at your screen.

a clear violation of the espionage act, 18 usc 793. there is the law. why was hillary cleared? because the investigation was rigged. why did comey and peter strzok start writing and exoneration and may? they didn't interview here to july. why did they take out gross negligence, the legal standard, and replace it with extreme carelessness? why did peter strzok allow two other people in the interview room when he was interviewing clinton on july 2nd, 2016? comey exonerated her on july 5th. they had written my first and may. why did bill clinton on loretta lynch talk about on the secret meeting on the tarmac in phoenix just before hillary was cleared? did lunch, the fbi, did they work in concert together to clear the clintons? that they break that investigation when it's obvious she committed multiple felonies because she was the one that should won 100 million to zero and trump supporter's roy smalley walmart voters? hillary clinton's rigged investigation, spying on the

trump campaign, committing a fraud and fisa abuse, to unmasking american citizens and abusing the powerful tools of intelligence, we will now finally get the answers. i know that media won't go there. they would have to admit they are wrong. they won't apologize, they want to attract. they want to say, jeez, they got it right for you don't hold your breath. more on thislot throughout the show. first, we must report on our "hannity watch" on the radical socialists. 2020 democrats. a very revealing way for some of the far left sycophants trying to become president.yi we start with the current mayor of south bend, indiana. yes. that guy, mayor pete. pete buttigieg is his name. he said the electoral college is just one big republican manipulation of the system. okay. watch this. >> if he realized that this would be a fairer place if everyone's vote counted the same

and if the way we picked our president was to tally up the votes and give it to the person who got the most votes, then now is a moment to make that change. most americans don't want this. most americans don't want the conservative agenda that we are now seeing, the extreme agenda we are seeing in washington. in fact, it is precisely for that reason that they have to interfere with democracy with things like voter suppression or clicking on an electoral college it overrules the will of the american people. and it's precisely because the american people by and large don't want what they are selling that they are relying on manipulations of our political structure in order to keep their agenda in place. >> sean: let me educate mayor pete for a moment. if you want the good people of his home state of indiana to have a voice in the presidential election -- i like the people from indiana -- he should probably rethink what is his unconstitutional stance on the electoral college because without our current system, new york, new jersey, illinois, and california, they would

decide every national contest. his state of indiana, for that matter, new hampshire, iowa, south carolina, all the red states down south, they would be totally ignored. it wouldn't matter. is that with the good mayor wants? sadly mayor pete is not the only democrat trampling on the u.s. constitution. california congressman eric swalwell is running on an anti-second amendment agenda. look at this. first he suggested the federal government because could easily disarm americans because it has nukes. but on sunday, he took it down a notch and said that he just supports jailing americans who don't comply with his plan to seize guns that he classifies as dangerous. here comes the government. get ready. take a look. >> criminal prosecution for keeping assault weapons, what is the punishment for people who don't hand in their guns? do they go to jail? >> they would. the reason i have proposed this is because these weapons are so

devastating. i've seen this as a prosecutor in the cases that are prosecuted. we see these in the school shootings from sandy hook to parkland and i was just at parkland earlier this week during a town hall. it is not just the violence they have caused. it's the fear, the immeasurable fear that our children live in because they are still in our streets. i want to get rid of that fear. i want to do what australia did and new zealand did. i think this issue needs bold leadership. >> sean: i want to get rid of the fear of you not understanding the constitutional or wanting to stack the courts are bernie sanders last night on this network suggesting, a woman could have an abortion up until the last minute. during birth. as a virginia governor said, first we'll deliver the baby, make sure it's comfortable, then mom gets to decide. the baby gets resuscitative health if needed. you're not, fox news contributor andy mccarthy. the "the wall street journal" kimberley strassel, fox news contributor sara carter. all more deserving than

"the new york times" and "the washington post" for their hoax pulitzer. andy, two page article that was fascinating. you talk about this buying but on top of that, the fisa abuse tcome on top of that, we also have a rigged investigation into hillary because she did commit real crimes. >> i think as attorney general barr put it last week, the question of spying should not be a question anymore. there is no question -- there should be no dispute that had surveillance happened, whatever you want to collect. the issue is, was it properly predicated? i think what we are seeing now, there seems to have been an insufficient -- for my own perspective, if i had authorized an investigation of the president, if i had used the government's counterintelligence powers in order to investigate the campaign of the opposition party and people were calling me out about whether i had a good

reason for it, i wouldn't be able to wait to tell you what it was. i think it's very telling that rather than invite an inquiry into what caused this investigation to take place in the first place, what they are doing is attacking the people who simply want answers to simple questions, how did this get originated? what was the reason for it? >> sean: great questions. sara, let's go to your breaking news. i have a copy of the letter to which you refer, elijah cummings got a letter from congressman jim jordan rc, maxine waters, and cowardly adam schiff apparently were sending out secret memorandums of understanding about how to get trump at the next level. even though thursday and collusion, and's obstruction, in all reality, and begins everything we'veit talked about for two years, now they want to go ao the next conspiracy theory. why apologize for the old one?

>> it's really incredible. congressman jordan, who is the ranking member on the house oversight and government reform committee, actually discover this within recent days, that adam schiff, as well, maxine waters, elijah cummings, elijah cummings, the chairman of the committee, basically withheld those from the ranking member, and that is against the committee rules. they basically sign these memorandums of i understanding d secrecy, so it's kind of like a pact between all of them to go after and target president trump. one of the things they wanted was trump's former accounting firm while he was in the private sector, and they want all the documentation, all financial records going back to 2009. i mean, this is really incredible. they are going to have a huge fight on their hands. once again, the investigation, robert mueller's investigation, has been wrapped up.

they found no conspiracy, no collusion. we've seen it on the other side. as far as obstruction, there were no obstruction charges whatsoever. now they are looking for something else, digging deeper, a huge fight on their hands. i know congressman jordan, congressman meadows and others are very angry about this, and i don't think they are going to get any of that documentation anytime soon. >> sean: kimberly, this is all they got. we read the quote from the mueller report that barr released, no collusion, no conspiracy to collude with russia . we'll watch the predictable freak out by that same people that have been wrong for over two and a halfpl years, lying to the american people. on the other side of the story, we do have a rigged investigation into hillary clinton, where real crimes were committed. real felonies underlying the intent to obstruct justice by deleting and acid washing hard drives, 53 that we know of

closed-door interviews that will come out. then we have criminal referrals by nunes, the horwitz report, the john huber report, then we'll get the fisa applications, the bulk of which was based on the hillary bought and paid for russian lies, then we'll get 302s, gang of eight information, it's really just starting. except this timeg there is a rel evidence, not hype. >> this is all they got. i still think everyone should be very honest and brace themselves for what is going to happen on thursday when the mueller report comes out. we know the topline conclusionsu and is understood there is no evidence of collusion. but don't forget that the information that bob mueller was given by the fbi included a lot of dirt that hasn't been outa yet. we know that bruce ohr, he was having other conversations with christopher steele,oh fusion gp, passing notesio along to the fb,

and these are the things that mueller looked at. democrats are going to comb through this report and they will throw all that out there. it's not going to matter that mueller found there was no evidence. i think everybody needs to be awareon that that -- >> sean: they are going to rant and rave. on the legal side, no underlying crime, as mueller said, you can't have intent to obstruct, we all know that when trump said i hatee mueller, we should fire him, he didn't do any of those things. he didn't obstruct. >>e he didn't. i d think kim is right. we will. get 400 pages of almost collusion, almost obstruction. it will be like the indictments. flip to the next page and there is nothing prior >> sean: and then it all dies. all of it. they just don't know that their lives are dead already. thank you all, great work on all your parts. when we come back, speakerar pelosi continues doering created

congresswoman ocasio-cortez. we'll tell you the latest dig. lawrence jones hit the streets. what did they think of congressman omar's 9/11 her marks and more, straight ahead. total control. i can just skip the counter and choose any car in the aisle i like. so i can rent fast without getting a hair out of place. heeeeey. hey! ah, control. (vo) go national. go like a pro.

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that.

shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free. omar, check this out. uh, yeah, i was calling to see if you do laser hair removal. for men. notice that my hips are off the ground. [ engine revving ] and then, i'm gonna pike my hips back into downward dog. [ rhythmic tapping ] hey, the rain stopped. -a bad day on the road still beats a good one off it. -tell me about that dental procedure again! -i can still taste it in my mouth! -progressive helps keep you out there.

♪ >> sean: the democratic party led by congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez is in a battle with speaker pelosi for control over the party.r this weekend, pelosi downplaying the power struggle. i don't know if i would like as if ido was at aoc on twitter. >> she likes to minimize the conflict within her caucus between the moderates and the progressives. >> you have these wings, aoc and her group on one side -- >> some people. >> the progressive group. >> i'm a progressive.

ro>> sean: pelosi's large criticism of ocasio-cortez didn't stop there. yesterday the speaker took another veiled swipe at herle again. open warfare. >> it wasn't a district like mine or alexandria's, however, she's a wonderful member of congress, i think all of our colleagues will attest, both those are districts that arere solidly democratic, this glass of water would win with a d in those districts. >> sean: madame speaker, if congresswoman ocasio-cortez is just 1 of 5 upstarts whose issue into an micro district, why did you put her on the all-powerful house financial services and house oversight committee? congresswoman ocasio-cortez isn't the only freshman liberal lawmaker causing speaker pelosi headaches. congresswoman omar has frequently been the subject of massive controversy surrounding her various and vera lent anti-semitic remarks

nancy pelosi being forced to defend her, saying democrats have no taint of anti-semitism and their party. yes, they do. recently, she faced a wave of criticism minimizing the 9/11 attacks, calling it some people who did some things. lawrence jones hit t the streeto find out what people thought of those comments. people who lived through it. take a look. >> i think downplaying the situation is horrible because it affected all of america at the time. >> how does that make you feel? >> having been at the 9/11 museum yesterday, it's definitely not a matter of ever saying -- downplaying it. >> she said some people did something, not referring to the terrorist attack. how does that make you feel? >> she has freedom of speech. i am more appalled by

donald trump's reactions to her. >> i think she's pretty sensitive toto the issue that everybody wants to lock every person who identifies with the muslim phase, no matter whethers radical or not, into one big ben and that is problematic for our country. >> sean: here with more, editor in chief of campus or foreign, fox news contributor, lawrence jones and fox news contributor a ari fleischer. the sentiment seems to be clear. we remember, everyone remembers, young people diving out of that window becausebo they couldn't take the heat anymore. lost 3,000 americans. i lost friends that day. we lost friends in washington. i'll never forget people like todd beamer. how could you ever forget someone that brave that save liveset? >> i think this is a pretty simple thing. most americans realize it was

radical islamichi terrorists tht brought this nation to its knees that day. the fact that she could not identify that is troubling. i get a lot of people want to be very sensitive on this issue and not call it for what it is. but people that share their religion, people that do bad things, have the right to call -- and the duty, to call it the bad actors and say, this iss not us, they don't speak for us. the fact that she can't do that and call theak terrorist by ther names as well as acknowledge this dramatic event that happened in our country, it's concerning. i think everybody in her party should call it out. >> sean: ari, i played a clip last night, we know her anti-semitic statements, we know -- she was saying the way people put emphasis on al qaeda and not america, not england, i am like, are you really going to make the comparison as if they don't deserve the rightful

distinction of evil radicalism? >> i tried to pick my words with care, i try not to use pejorative terms against people but she is a radical. she has espoused anti-semitic points of view and the dismissive way she approaches what happened on september 11th is the thinking of a radical. a radical who is now an elected member of congress, a radical who can get the fellow democrats in congress not to condemn her actual words because of the power of the progressive block in congress. it's more than five people and nancy pelosi is wisely worried about it. this is their radicalism is the democratic party. it's only growing worse. >> sean: do you think -- up until this point, nancy pelosi has been fearful of congresswoman tliab at omar and ocasio-cortez. is she trying to pull back some of the power? who wins this power struggle? she doesn't have a big margin being speaker, doshi? >> nancy pelosi show that she is

starting to get fed up, very interesting. nancy pelosi knows what she's doing. she would not have their associated notes two statements about aoc if she didn't think she needed to. she's sending a signal to the other democrats in her caucus that you need to step up, fight her. >> that is all p.r. that is all p.r. at the end of the day, yet they still got powerful committees, and a lot of influence within the caucus. i would say these people are the freedom caucus for the right. yes, she may say one thing in front of the camera but at the end of the day, they are pushing legislation. >> sean: they got another 2020n candidates buying this ridiculous green new deal. he seems 100. the house and the presidential candidates for 2020. guys, good to see you both. thank you. first lady michelle obama for the first time in my adult life, i am proud of my country. set it a couple of times. actually being criticized by some on the left for what she said about president trump. we'll explain. tammy bruce, geraldo, they are

next in a busy breaking news night. we are glad you are with us. ♪ just one free hearing test at his local miracle ear helped andrew hear more of the joy in her voice. just one hearing test is all it took for him to hear more of her laugh... and less of the background noise around him. for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it

took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter. just one free hearing test could help you hear more... laughter...music...life... call now for your free hearing test from an industry leader: miracle-ear.

♪ ♪ >> sean: former first lady michelle obama, "for f the first time in my adult life, and part of my country," she said it a couple times. raising eyebrows after she compared president trump to a "divorced dad" and america to a broken family. she tells stephen colbert at a sunday book event, we come from a broken family. we are a teenager, a little unsettled, having good parents, it's tough sometimes you spend the weekend with the divorced dad. it feels like it's one but then you get sick. that is what america is going through. living with a divorced dad. i know some great divorced dads. they love their kids.

whatever happened to when they go low, legal high? even some of the destroy-trump-media, they are pushing back at these ridiculous comments. frankly, the broad sweeping generalization. >> she got some chuckles but that was a sexist comment. >> i think divorced dads everywhere are upset about it. >> it surprising to me that michelle obama would make this mistake. >> doel you think it was a mistake? >> yes. >> sean: do i think it was a mistake? one of my best friends, john gomez, he married the love of his life who happened to be divorced and hadar a girl, he ws the best step dad ever, ever. fox news contributor,ow tammy bruce, fox news correspondent at large geraldo rivera. geraldo, let's start with you. >> because i've been divorced? [laughs] >> sean: kind of. you know something because i

know you. every single one of your ex-wife loves you. and your children love you. i've been around them many, many times, and they are great kids. that is so demeaning and insulting, that generalization of hers. >> it is demeaning and insulting, and you should won the people's pulitzer prize, your team, and the people who won it for "the new york times" and "washington post" should give it back."t having said that, as a person of his experience divorce as you suggest, she's equating, reduced us to a sexist stereotype, we are the bad parent who gives candy and what's the kid watch too much tv because we have a guilty conscience about the breakup of the marriage. it's a rare misstep, though, and in fairness, my wife and -- >> sean: no passes here. how do you make a pass? >> that's not what we are talking about. we are talking about divorced

dads. here in cleveland, she bent over backwards to be gracious about the president. that is why this surprised me because it's a no-brainer. 30% of custodial parents following divorce are the men. men of divorce. so she's reduced us to the stereotype. we are drinking beer, we see the kids every other sunday, they are running around, go ahead, get, it all the cotton candy you want. sushe's equating that scenario with the american people and their view of president trump. that is what this is about. a false feel-good sentiment in the country because of thet presidents irresponsibility. >> sean: i know geraldo's kids kids. they love and worship their father. he's a great dad. only because it's been so widely publicized. i wouldn't have brought it up

otherwise, geraldo, you know that. you talk about it often. how insulting, just like it was insulting, world war ii, beating fascism, imperial japan? oh, only now you are proud of your country? >> i will tell you, it is a pleasure to be on with both of you guys here, and i -- if i was in the audience, at her book to her, the audience was actually a little taken aback. there were some chuckles as was noted on that clip from that other network. this is a very strange -- i don't know if it'sot necessarily out of step. i think michelle obama has been known for being very honest and she doesn't tend to edit herself. i think that when she does, it's a deliberate effort to do so. this may have reflected more ofv her point of view. the problem here is, it's not just insulting to men. for every woman and man out in that audience who didn't quite know why she was insulting them,

it relies also on the other side of the coin, which is a gender stereotype of women. that all women are supposed to be either great mothers or only women can raise children or only women can be good parents. the best scenario is, two parents who love those kids. we know that love is love, and it's about the nature of who can love a child. that is also of course part of the problem for america is the gender stereotyping that the left is normally going out against, she really destroys in that regard. this is one of my points about the left and liberals. you scratch the service a little bit, you get these real opinions that are quite the opposite of what they have been arguing for. >> sean: real quick. why do they get a pass, geraldo? if a conservative said this, forget it. >> because of she's made 50 speeches in the last 40 days and

this is the first time you've heard something that was a misstep. she's an elegant lady -- >> sean: you are so forgiving. >> she had a rough time at the white house. i think that she will be fondly remembered by most. i love melania, onward andup upward. i think that she has to be judged by her track record. >> sean: last word, tammy. >> i think that she's not a sloppy woman. she said what she meant, and it was insulting, and i i think it revealed a side of her that a lot of people don't like but i think we need to keep that in mind. it's weird how democrats keep doing that, keep surprising us with these kinds of opinions. >> sean: good to see you both. appreciate your time. when we come back, we have updates on two scandals, one involving lori loughlin, jussie smollett, and trace gallagher has a full report. also candace owens will be here confronted by a group of protesters, some with their faces covered in a really scary

scenario at a college campus yesterday. she'll give us all the details. ♪ it's kind of like playing your own version of best ball. because here, you can choose any car in the aisle, even if it's a better car class than the one you reserved. so no matter what, you're guaranteed to have a perfect drive. [laughter] (vo) go national. go like a pro. see what i did there?

up. up. down. down. ah ah! that's one. up. that's two. down. down. get down, get down.

♪ >> sean: breaking developments, jussie smollett hate crime folks, fox news correspondent trace gallagher, t newsroom tonight at the very latest. lori loughlin is claiming, we were manipulated, we thought we were breaking rules, not laws. >> she said she was -- before we get to that, breaking news out of chicago. two weeks before dropping the charges against jussie smollett, the "chicago tribune" reports that state's kim foxx sent text messages to herin top deputy calling smollett a washed up celebs but also said that compared to r&b star r. kelly,

he hadn't overcharged, "with four victims, ten counts, washed up celeb who lied to cops, 16. and messages, she acknowledges having recused herself but it's clearly still involved. "just because we can charge something doesn't mean we shoul should. "agreed." we can get a hard look at how we charge the cases and get into something that coversut would nd to be covered without being excess of an ultimately pointless." on the day the charges were dropped, she texted that she had just spoken with police superintendent eddie johnson. "laugh out loud. o he said the police recruit event, needing to know how to answer questions from press. he was told we were just dropping the charges. he seemed satisfied with the explanation. except eddie johnson was furious with her decision, as was then mayor rahm emanuel. smollett is being sued by the

city. meantime, lori loughlin, a source close to the actresses telling entertainment tonight that those who orchestrated the cheating scandal misled her about the severity of her involvement and that she and her husband were under the impression they were breaking rules, not laws. the source goes on to say, "they realized how serious the charges are but feel that once the judge hears their story, they will see they had no bad intentions."ba the legal expert say it is difficult to imagine any judge thinking a $500,000 $500,000 bs based on good intentions. >> sean: trace gallagher in the west coast newsroom. n turning point usa communications director candace owens was confronted by protesters, some wearing masks, how courageous of them, while she was walking on the upn campus yesterday. on her way to give a speech. here's what happened. >> [bleep]!

>> get the [bleep] out of philly! get the [bleep] out! [sirens wailing] >> [bleep]! [bleep]! [bleep]! [sirens wailing] >> sean: candace owens joins us now with more. candace, when i first met you, we had a very direct conversation. i don't know if you remember. i remember warning you that a lot of people will hate you for being a conservative. as an african-american. what i heard and saw there was "f candace owens, f the police." i'm sorry you had to go through that. >> i appreciate the apology. i knew what i was getting into when i got into this. i didn't realize how ugly it could get. i can't believe this is the

tolerant left but it's really important to hold up a mirror to laughter sent to expose him for exactly who and what they t are. >> sean: you actually said something, a couple of things, you said black americans are being misled by the democratic party. under the eight years of obama,t minorities in america were disproportionately negatively impacted by his policies. eight years. trump becomes president, record low unemployment, african-americans, hispanic-americans, women in the workplace, breaking every record imaginable. people that are benefitingac the most are the same people that were hurt the most under obama's policies. will this begin to resonate? i think you agree with me. tell me if you don't. >> i agree with you 100%. here's what i will also tell you. it already is resonating. that is why they are upping their attacks on me because they think i'm a part of the reason why it is resonating in the blacke community.

i said this on your show back h when i was first on it. there will be a black exit from the democrat party. the black vote is fully on the table and they are petrified because they relied on the black vote. we are talking about moving it five points, and the democrat party is toast. these antics you are seeing, really their fear. the updated kkk, and he fell, covering their bases, harassing me, trying to get -- >> sean: let me ask you this. i see you step into the situations, you know what.ou you feel the fear obviously, do it anyway. why is this -- it seems like this is a conviction inside of you that you feel passionately. why? >> i do. i spent a year and a half running from these guys, i've been through so manyhy?a kitch, going through the basement, backdoors, hiding, being fearful.l. i change my mind. a new policy. i will forever -- i encourage

all black americans, walk through the front door. if ruby bridges go do it at six years old in the 1960s, i sure can do it in 2019 in every country in america being blessed by a great presidency. >> sean: i really admire you as a person, who you are, the courage you show. we wish you continued success. it's amazing to watch. congratulations. when we come back, you won't believe one democrat using the notre dame cathedral fire to take a swipe at donald trump. of course. the villain of the next. ♪

these folks, they don't have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again!

♪ it is such a good time to dance ♪ ♪ it is such a good time to [ laughing ] ♪ scoobidoo doobidoo ♪ scoobidoo doobidoo

[ goose honking ] ♪ [ laughing ] a bad day on the road still beats a good one off it. ♪ progressive helps keep you out there. >> sean: are a villain of the day, democratic congressman steve cohen, proving that democrats will politicize even the worst tragedies. take a look. >> what he's done to the constitution and the rule of law is as bad as that fire did to notre dame. torquing the entire structure of

government and the people's respect for it. >> sean: so dumb, but it's fair. unfortunately that's all the time we have left. we will never be the rage hate-trump media mob ever. let not your heart be troubled. the news continues. laura ingraham. are you in l.a.? >> laura: i am in the swamp. >> sean: you complain when i say laura ingraham from the swamp. where are you? laura ingraham in the swamp. >> laura: i am where i am, not a school is where you are. hannity, great show tonight as always. you are killing it. i love it. i'm laura ingraham. this is "the ingraham angle" from washington. we have two big exclusives for you tonight. last week congressman devin nunes sought criminal referrals for improper behavior during the mueller probe and tonight we have a first look at how far they go. congressman nunes is here with