is >> i'm laura ingraham this friday. welcome to the special edition of "the ingraham angle," the mueller fallout from washington tonight. even though the special counsel found no collusion, no obstruction, a large contingent on the left are already banging the impeachment drum. the president's deputy press secretary hogan gidley is here with the white house's response. plus, she's been hitting it out of the park, kim stratsel is here. her new "wall street journal" piece methodically breaks down how the mueller report reveals a special counsel team obsessed with taking trump out. she tells us why the president should feel liberated tonight.

and raymond oroyo is here with a special edition of friday follies. the biggest meltdowns and the most hilarious moments of the last 24 hours of the mueller coverage and break down why barr's press conference was so effective. but first, it's now been 36 hours since the lightly redacted mueller findings were released to congress and to the american people. now, in making this public, as we told you last night, attorney general barr with the blessing of president trump has gone above and beyond what's required in the name of transparency. but, if you thought for a second that the democrats would be ready to move on, well, think again. >> moments ago, the house judiciary committee chairman jerry nadler issued the subpoena to see the full unredacted mueller report. >> we want to see everything, you know, in the cases of prior independent special counsels, the entire report with all of the underlying evidentiary

materials. >> well, there's got to be collusion under one of those rocks. the house judiciary committee led by jerry nadler is generously giving the attorney general until may 1 at 10:00 a.m. to turn over the unredacted report. remember, they can all go and do a skiff, a secure area and look at it themselves. but this is all good drama. by the way, they want the underlying documents, everything. in response, congressman doug collins, the top republican on the house judiciary committee accused democrats of issuing a wildly overbrowed subpoena adding correctly it's against the law to share it because the vast majority of the documents came as a result of nearly 2800 subpoenas from the grand jury that is still ongoing. you know, for all of the democrats' hand wringing over the president's disregard for the rule of law, they sure have problems, you know, abide big the rule of law themselves, especially if it can potentially hurt this white house, they'll

just dispense with the rule of law all together. all right, here to break it down. former u.s. attorney and colleague of bill barr, james trustee, former doj prosecutor and harvey dylan, republican national lawyer's association board member and trump 2020 advisory council member. gras et to see all of you tonight. guy, let's start with you. is there any chance that barr agrees to nadler's subpoena demand? >> laura, if it was me advising the attorney general, let me in a short way, no. n-o. i would make them follow the law. i would make them go to court and do exactly what you and the other lawyers know is so fundamental. i mean, you can't do it. the rule makes it illegal even if attorney general barr wanted to. to me, it's so ridiculous because he's already offered to make it available to various

members of congress. he's already supplied it in a very, very lightly redacted way. so, this just answers the question to me, you know, our politics and prosecution good bedfell bedfellows? absolutely not. you can see why here. >> yeah. like i said last night, mueller, his report, did not have to be released at all. bill barr was under no obligation to release it either to the public or to congress. he could have sent a synopsis of the report, his own version of the report. he sends the whole thing up very lightly redacted. they can all go to a secure location and look at the report unredacted all the people that -- the top security clearance including nadler, they know that. what is this charade all about? is it going to end up in the courts? >> probably. and it looks like moving goal posts when you demand things that you weren't entitled to in the first place. the grand jury guy is where it's spot on.

the grand jury materials are not something that people hand over because people speak loud lly h much they want it. it requires a judge to sign off in disclosure. it's in litigation. the witness has a prior statement in the grand jury. i'm entitled to review it. not because i'm a congressman or i want to have political hay coming from it. so that's uphill for congress to convince a court that they're the custodians of truth that need to see the grand jury part of it. the other areas you can solve by putting in a skiff, classified material, sensitive material. they can see that. the belly aching is because it makes it a tiny bit harder to leak it. >> the white house's attorneys, the president's attorneys, had to go over to the justice department to secua secure loca to read the report themselves. they had to go do that. maybe giuliani and one other attorney. they had to do that. they don't want to be inconvenienced? you know what this is all about? politic

politics and -- you know this better than anybody else, when they lose on the substance, they go right to trying to score political points because they flopped out of the last two years. i've been in washington frankly for way too long. whether it's the republicans pulling this deal or the democr democrats, it's all about politics. it's zero about legal procedure or transparency. >> right, laura. you know the term relitigated is abused in our profession, but it is really relitigating a criminal proceeding that did not get the desired result. it's not just that they don't want, that they don't want to follow the rules, they're coordinating with the media. so just two weeks ago, the reporters' committee for freedom of the press filed a lawsuit with this district court seeking the grand jury materials to be released. and that's clearly a coordinated effort with the democrats in my opinion. but, you know, wish as you will, the rule is very ex-police it and exactly two weeks ago, the dc circuit ruled that even though there was a very

interesting case involving a indictment of an fbi official in a criminal case, 40, 50 years ago, that under no circumstances could compelling public interest justify this release. so in a case like that where everybody is already dead and there's no concern about privacy to specific living individuals, the court still said, sorry, we just cannot do it. and so i think they said the rule is very, very clear. >> it's ridiculous. >> such a good lawyer. such a good -- the dc circuit. it. >>s ridiculous. it's absolutely absurd. almost as absurd, by the way, i want all of your thoughts on this, by the way real quick. the language surrounding attorney general bill barr, the language they used to describe one of the most successful well respected legal minds in the country, who didn't need this job. he was already attorney general 30 years ago. it's got more vitriolic, more

vicious, following the release of this lightly redacted mueller report. let's watch. >> it sounded like a spokesman, not an attorney general. >> barr is going to be remembered for this. it was just a deception and a misrepresentation. this was a political speech endorsing the president's behavior. >> guy, you're close to the ag barr. what's the reaction to the analysts. two of them are lawyers. one were not a lawyer. watergate, woodward. bob woodward says it in the livestock of all of the people in the world, you're supposed to bow down. this is casual defamation. >> let me tell you real quickly how i first met the attorney general. we were in miami, we were trying noriega, first time ever we'd gotten a foreign leader here in the u.s. trying on drug trafficking, 20 plus soldiers died in the process.

he was intensely involved in it. calling down to the u.s. attorney's office, wanting to know we were doing everything possible. he was crossing t's, he was dotting i's. i'm telling you, laura, straight as an arrow, the guy is a lawyer's lawyer. and to be accused of some of the things that they're accusing him of, i don't know. it's very, very disappointing. >> people say he should resign. i've known barr almost as long as you. maybe not quite as long as you. but i think for a couple of decades. it's one of the people, if you need a legal analysis, dispassionate legal analysis, sober judgment, he's one of the rare people you can go to, frankly. and, jim, i got to tell you, this is one of the most disgusting things to come out of the trump era. anyone who supports any part of this president's agenda is smeared in one way or the other. it's smeared, it's implicated.

it's harassed. but this is a game they play. but they're playing at real high stakes against barr. >> two things about that that are bothering to me. the first is, it's a gratuitous game. you can attack the president right now. you can pull through all of these pages and same look at this, look at this, look at this. it adds up to ten. whatever you want to do. you've got some meat you can play with. you don't have to go after barr. it's completely gratuitous. beyond that, the message is a guy is completely filled with integrity that has the gravitas anyone should want in this position. and the message is if you're a public servant, you're associated with the wrong president, we're trashing you individually, your character, your moral fiber. that's the message a lot of people are getting, the rosensteins, the muellers, the barr's, god knows how many others. if you stand in the way of the machine, you're going to get crushed. i hate what that means for public service. >> who will want to do it? the next is impeachment or not.

watch? >> it's worthwhile to put in history's files what this man has done and impeach him. >> nobody is pursuing impeachment right now. >> i think there's a conversation to be had on that subject. >> it's too early to talk about that. >> and earlier today, elizabeth war rep became the very first 2020 candidate for calling for trump's impeachment. >> you know what this means, laura. anybody who is hoping to be able to maintain some equilibrium on this issue on the left is now if they're running for president going to immediately try to out elizabeth warren here. speaking of elizabeth warren, this is somebody who lied throughout her career about who she is. she thinks this is an impeachable offense, series of offenses, she has no standing not just with eric smallwell who went on television or lied to the american people about the evidence he's seen which clearly did not exist. to me, reading the mueller report, i found it personally to

be biassed. i heard mueller was a man above integrity. it's an extended op-ed, part two, the extended op-ed, gratuitous smears against the president. it wasn't objective. without the lack of objectivity and bias, they still couldn't find anything. with these hacks, no other word for them, to use it to tear apart the country in this way, i would say have at it from a political point of view. from the country's point of view, it's bad. >> we have to move on. they won't to their detriment. we're going to thank the democrat party for 2020. panel, thank you so much for that tonight. and the same network that patted itself on the back for the journalism they conducted throughout the investigation did more of that same journalism last night. here's cnn's anderson cooper. badgering white house principle deputy press secretary, hogan gidley. >> what democrats have wanted for so long is for -- >> democrats want? >> for the president to be

guilty. >> if he had anything on him, he would be indicted today. he wasn't because they don't have the evidence. >> did the president lie? >> they have to put up or shut up, anderson. >> did the president lie? >> no, i'm not aware of him lying. he hadn't lied to me. >> do you feel bad you're scared to say your boss lies. i would not work in that situation. >> i just said nothing -- >> with me is hogan didley, hogan, i will -- love watching it on tv. let's talk about your boss. anderson? let's talk about mr. zucker. let's have a conversation. because this is -- this little gotcha game, we can go two ways with it. everybody feels -- because they're hosts ohhen a cable network that cable can be turned on all of us. i'm always in the cross hairs. but what was that like being on set. it was one hit after the other. obviously focusing on the ten obstructive acts. >> sure, listen, first of all, not going to take a lecture on truth telling from anybody in the main stream media who's been

lying about this president for the last two years, telling the american people that donald trump committed treason which is a crime punishable by death as you well know. what you didn't play in that clip after he said that i told him you have a panel full of liars every single night on this show. >> darn -- >> oh. >> the point is, for me to sit there with cnn and listen to them, who they wanted this to be true so badly. so many in the media did, and i understand why they don't drop it. because if they did, they would be admitting the fact that the last two years of their life was a complete and total waste. >> mitt romney tonight released a statement. i'm sickened at the extent and pervasiveness of dishonesty and misdirection of individuals of the highest office of the land including the president. he went on to say reading the report is a sobering revelation of how far we've strayed from the aspirations and the principles of the founders. what do you think of old mitt

romney coming out? >> what's sobering is the fact that mitt romney would join in with the chorus of people who refuse to acknowledge the fact that after, you know, $35 million and 1.4 million documents and countless hours of the president being an open book allowing all of this to be put forth, public, not asking for redaction, not meddling at all, not firing anybody, allowing this to go forward, he would join with the democrats and say we want more. i'm telling you this right now this, is not moving the gold post, this is changing staid williams. with ear in a whole other ball game. you can let the democrats work in the white house, give them top secret security clearances, let them stay in the oval all day and sleep in the residence and it wouldn't be enough for them. they want something else. >> i don't remember anderson cooper with susan rice across the table. go to the sunday shows and say the benghazi attack was started by some anti-islamic video.

why did you do that? maybe he did it, i'm forgetting it. i don't remember the same ferocity of the criticism. look, you worked with the president for sometime now. i know him quite well. he's tough. right? he can be tough. but he's also funny and charming. but he's demanding. and i never -- i'm never rattled by a demanding boss. it's someone who wants to hold the bar high. and i know he wants to succeed. he was frustratedle wi we all k that. he said publicly, i'm going after him. i'm blank. he was really angry. he told a lot of people a lotf oh things. he was really angry. what does that tell you about him? and did he ever tell you or anyone you know to go out and tell an untruth? >> absolutely not? i've never had a conversation with him like that at all. and let's be honest, any red blooded american who's falsely accused of a crime for two plus years would probably be a little upset about it, especially when you knew the fact that you had

done nothing wrong. no collusion, no obstruction, a complete and total exoneration. and they pushed this lie. and they had the numbers i was looking at since may of 2017, "the new york times" has put out 1,156 stories about mueller, cnn, 1,965. and msnbc tops more than 4,000. they just can't get past the fact they didn't get what they wanted here. they wanted a conviction. they wanted a smoking gun. they had no evidence. and like i said last night, if bob mueller, special counsel, had anything on the president, he would have indicted. prosecutors prosecute, but they only prosecute if they have the evidence. he didn't, and this is a complete and total exoneration of this president. >> this was shift today on msnbc. let's watch. >> an impeachment proceeding cannot be successful if one party decides they're more loyal to their party or to the person of the president than they are to the constitution and the country. >> the gop has no independence from this president. it has made itself effectively a

cult of trump's personality. >> the president of the united states is too weak to confront vladimir putin when it comes to election interference. as long as they interfere on his side, he may be grateful. >> i don't recall him being upset that it all happened under obama's watch. but you can react to any of that. apparently the president is just too -- is he stilicl colluding with russia? >> i heard him on the same network on the clip you played earlier with someone else on cnn. he didn't feel as though it was time to move forward on impeachment because he didn't have overwhelming and demonstrable evidence. wait a minute. you've been telling america that you had the evidence. you've seen the collusion. you know it exists. no one pushes up and follows up and says, hey, where's your evidence rchlt you going to step down for lying to someone for two years? are you going to be held accountable at all? it's disgraceful. >> stetler is tweeting out, 29 days since a formal press briefing, not a sign of the

confident white house. when's the next briefing? >> i don't know, the president makes the calls all the time, he tells us when he wants us to go out. we gaggle multiple times a day. they don't want to gaggle. >> they have to get their own careers and get contracts with networks. we know how it works. we're not in the business of making them famous. >> thank you for being on with us. i appreciate it. the worst media offenders of the week, oh, boy. it's got its eyes on you. the tape you don't want to miss. next, plus, a special mueller edition of friday follies with raymond, that's ahead.

>> it's easy to become numb about media bias these days. sophie is keeping track of the worst offenders of the week, which you know, you can all imagine, we're in a tizzy over the mueller report. so after spending two years with this collusion thing, some of the print media didn't have a single no collusion headline on the front page. they ignored the main headline of the report. but that's not all. here to break down the mueller media mania, fox news contributor and president of the independent women's voice, along with former cnn contributor and

the contributing ed sorry tcontributing editor. the allege that the mueller report is a gift to the kremlin, watch? >> vladimir putin can fly the mission accomplished sign on his whatever carrier squadron or whatever he has or whatever he's building. >> "the wall street journal" headline now reads, putin has won. >> knob broke the law, so if i'm putin, i say let's do it again. >> let's be clear, this report is a gift to the government of russia. this is a proud moment for vladimir putin for several reasons. >> jeff, is this how they express their disappointment or sorrow, apologies over there? what's going on? >> yeah. yeah. they ignored the main headline. one of the things i think is amusing, laura, i want to read you this short excerpt of a sentence in the mueller report by the mueller folks, that the

russians did this, quote, to provoke and amplify political and social discord in the united states, end quote. as all of those folks have just demonstrated, they succeeded beyond their wildest. >> dreams because all of the people took the bait bigtime. >> tammy, i've watched meltdowns before in the american media, but i think this is one for the ages. because for so long, they had banked it all on trump was like trying to do a deal with russia. they had the dossier. they went to the trump tower meeting. then it was cohen and praying. none of this handout. >> and even in the past, they'd gone so far as to making things up. some people in the other network got fired or had to resign. so they recognized in their own process that they're so invested in this false narrative that they had to fake it. at this point, with the clips you showed, it's turned into fan fiction. it's not even -- it's -- it's almost as if they know it's absolutely impossible.

but they can't let it go. it's like that show, "intervention" where the person starts to run across the parking lot because they don't want to get into the van to go to the airport to go to the rehab center. they've completely lost any sense of normalcy of any kind of sense of reality. they know it. they don't care. they just think, well, maybe this is going to be click bait and maybe some of our audience will come back. >> msnbc host arie mel burn is a lawyer. apparently -- not sure if he's a good one or if he just misread part of the mueller report. >> that goes back to what mueller implies repeatedly here which is, if anyone else did this, they'd be busted. they'd be arrested. they'll probably be in jail. and it's different when it's the president. >> oh, tammy. is this the wapiti psi for t the -- is this the fantasy of the media folks, to see the president walked out of the white house in handcuffs. they thought they were going to see that? the orange jump suit. and, again, if you read the report and read what they said

about obstruction, it wasn't all banked on article ii and examining article ii powers. they didn't have the corrupt intent. they couldn't get corrupt intent because they didn't get an interview with the president and they wouldn't have had it even if they did, period. >> yeah, the media has been relying on the phrases like the walls are closing in. you know? they're coming in to get them. his whole family is going to walk out in the handcuffs. and normally, you would think this is someone who is saying this to their psychiatrist in the shrink's office. no, they've been saying it on television. now, with the reality of it, it's almost pathological at this point. but the book on obstruction shouldn't have been written at all. it's based in that kind of fantasy, almost like the consolation prize that the democrats and the media can try to hang their hat on something. >> because the president clears president trump of conspiring, coordinating with the russians, we should be done with the

media's collusion dreams, i would have thought. well, not so fast. >> ultimately, the conclusion here in this special counsel was it did not rise to the level of a violation of the law. but there is significant contact here. you might even seiko luci-- say collusion, george. >> i understand that someone on the trump campaign drank a white russian at the bar. okay? so, john, john, carl, jeff, go ahead. >> the only collusion here, i mean, these people keep asking for transparency. they want to talk collusion. they're about to get the real truth with all of these deep state people in the fbi and the department of justice who were colluding with members of the media to trap donald trump, to frame donald trump. and they were obsessed about it. they're still obsessed about it. they're so disappointed they didn't get him and they're going to try again. the only one they're going to get is themselves. >> well, they need to go to, you

uh know, some type of rehabilitation program or spa treatment or rehab. they got to -- they've got to be able to shake this. this is like an addiction to them. they've got to shake it. great to see both of you tonight. thank you so much. love having you on. >> thanks, laura. >> when we come back, raymond arroyo brings you a special edition of friday follies. the hilarious moments of the mueller meltdowns and schooling some young journalists. that provide all-day comfort. to keep him feeling more energized. dr. scholl's. born to move.

let's blow out the candles together! ok, let's huff and puff. like you do sometimes, grandpa? well, when you have copd, it can be hard to breathe. so my doctor said... symbicort can help you breathe better- starting within 5 minutes. it doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. symbicort helps provide significant improvement of your lung function. symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. it may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems.

tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. symbicort could mean a day with better breathing. watch out, piggies! ask your doctor if symbicort is right for you. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.

>> live from america's news headquarters, top democrats declining an offer from attorney general william barr to let 12 members of congress to see a less redacted version of the mueller report. the offer required the 12 members to not discuss the report with the rest of congress, despite them all being privy to confidential information. democrat leader said the congress needs the full unred t unredacted report to properly perform the constitutional duty to oversee the president. devastating a swath of a florida panhandle has been upgraded to a rare category five. scientists conduct add detailed post storm analysis and found it made land fall at 160 miles per hour, higher than first estimated. it makes michael the first category 5 storm to make a

recorded landfall in the u.s. now back to the "ingraham angle." >> it's friday. that means it's time for -- the worst media 34e89down following the mueller report, mic drop moment and two hit 70s sitcoms coming back to tv. "new york times" best-selling auth author. the new will wilder book, the am you leapt of power. what were some of the oddest moments in the media atmosphere yesterday. >> laura, in the wake of the mueller report, some like rachael maddow, for instance, spent half of the show just reading the report. it was like reading rainbow for the politically obsessed. watch. >> the russian government interfere in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion. quote, the special counsel -- >> march 18, 2016, the ira

purchased an advertisement depicting candidate clinton in a caption reading -- he requested to members of his campaign that they needed to figure out ways to find clinton's e-mails. >> i like her reading stuff. i like -- i'd listen to a book. >> i'm a big advocate of reading aloud, particularly to kids. but vice took it a step forward. they read the entire report in just under 12 hours. laura. look at the beautiful pictures they provided there. there were dramatic moments, laura. once the report dropped, chris cuomo and major giuliani were one for the ages. the word of the day was lie! >> if i want to know if you will apologize on the part of the president for denying russian interference all along. >> you've got to be kidding me. >> i'm saying that the president lied? >> the president did not lie. he did not have a business deal -- >> why does he -- >> why did the president lie about it? >> the president didn't lie

about it. he didn't know about it. >> why did the president -- >> would you please stop using the word "lie" when you don't know what you're talking about. >> they're friends. >> when you're so wedded to a narrative and it falls apart with a report, you get this reaction, joe digenova popped up on "hill tv," the host there said bill barr may have lied. >> you have no evidence that he lied. and you know it. >> but i'm telling you. >> you said he may have lied. >> what i'm telling you is what he said today in the press conference is inconsistent with what's in our -- >> that's not a lie. >> that's -- okay. fine. >> it's not fine. you're on national television calling the attorney general a liar. >> i didn't say that. >> you suggested it very strongly. >> all right, i think we're done here. >> i think we are. >> whew! joe digenova brought out the gloves. is maddow still reading? >> encrypted applications.

without them being able to track what happened to the contract. >> the prosecutor's judgment that crimes were committed but no charges will be brought affords no -- >> the president's message to sessions he should cop fine the russian investigation to only future election meddling. >> [snoring]. >> oh, sorry. >> i like her reading. she has a great -- >> she should do audiobooks. >> i have to ask you about bill barr's press conference. i think -- i got all of these tweets, texts, why was it what we're hearing from some of the malcontents, why was it effective? >> barr takes yoga. he's cool and even. he's the george foreman of lawyers. he takes a punch, he just stands there. watch the exchange. he had with cbs's paul reed who challenged him over whether the president faced ap unprecedented situation in the russian probe. >> it seems like there's a lot of effort to -- to

acknowledge -- >> is there another precedent for it? >> no. >> so unprecedented is an accurate description, isn't it? >> yeah. >> okay. >> could you image if any jeff sessions were here. you can sense barr's frustration went on as the reporters asked increasingly ridiculous questions all leading to this mic drop moment. >> impropriety for you to come out and sort of spin the report before the public gets the chance to read it? >> thank you very much. >> thank you. >> nope. bye-bye. he just walks away. i love the walk-off. he doesn't even say good-bye. he said do you feel you're spinning this. nope, and he's gone. it's a great moment. >> he should have dropped the actual mic. >> you may remember "all in the family," the "the jeffersons," abc said they're going to air a live classic episode with each of those shows with an all-star cast. woody harrellson and marisa

tomei will play archie and edith bunker and jamie foxx will play george jefferson. do you believe this is going to work, laura? >> i don't like tinkering with the best. and that -- those show s were among the best ever produced. >> i conducted the last interview with carol o'connor. he talked about why it worked. this is why i think this new it ration will not. watch? >> you cannot laugh at the character you're playing. you cannot be aware that he's funny. as an actor. you have to play intentionally and you have to play him fiercely and angrily and that's what makes him funny. >> he was a classic. i think we're afraid of this material today. and i doubt if an actor is going to play him through. i think they'll comment on him, which will not work. >> mad that bunker ended up

being so -- >> sympathetic. >> and people didn't like meat head. >> right. >> they didn't like it. >> all right, stifle yourself, you're out of time, edith. >> next week we're doing the easter thing with the kids. >> yeah, i'll filling in thursday and friday. >> we've got huckabee and you on thursday and friday. so everybody tune in. more -- is the whole thing going to be follies? >> all fall l-- follies. >> since mueller eventually told the truth about collusion, some are willing to give him a pass. but does he deserve it? uh-oh? kim is here with her take, next. ♪ ♪ i can do more to lower my a1c. because my body can still make its own insulin. and i take trulicity once a week to activate my body to release it, like it's supposed to. trulicity is not insulin. it starts acting in my body from the first dose and continues to work when i need it, 24/7. trulicity is an injection to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes

when used with diet and exercise. don't use it as the first medicine to treat diabetes, or if you have type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, you're allergic to trulicity, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your low blood sugar risk. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and decreased appetite. these can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i choose once-weekly trulicity to activate my within. if you need help lowering your a1c, ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity.

you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. >> the fact they have the meeting in the trump tower is self-evident kind of collusion. >> trump tower meeting which was indeed convened for the purpose of collusion. >> that trump tower meeting was

what the liberal media hung its hat on for months. it turned out to be a complete dud. if you don't want to take my word for it, mueller is saying the same thing in the report. my next guest found something suspicious in the report, though. how did the mueller team create an entire section of the report on one meeting, without noting that the russian lawyer at the time at the trump tower meeting was working with fusion gps? kim straysle, the fox news contributor. editorial member for "the wall street journal." why wasn't the russian reporter include in the report. >> she's name in the report, laura. but in the whole section about trump tower. and, in fact, it's remarkable, because we have this huge section, thousands of words, describing every last moment of that meeting, okay? the only thing they didn't put in there is what they had for

lunch beforehand. i mean, every last thing is documented. including the fact that she was present and lots of information about her, except for this one important detail -- that she was working alongside the organization that produced the dossier. now, how do you do that? laura? how do you write a whole section in which you describe pretty much everything you know about her and you don't put that in i would argue it's very careful and deliberate because the entire report seems to be absolutely obsessed with not questioning anything the fbi did or passing judgment on any of its poor conduct. >> this is what she said admitting her work with fusion gps. >> she got much of her information from an american firm, fusion gps. >> glen simpson's company, they worked with us on this case. >> they cited the mueller report, all sorts of television

appearances, editorials, columns. lots of media resources. they could have cited that, i guess. in that -- the spire part of the report dealing with obstruction read like an op-ed. like always credibility went against trump, the benefit of the doubt was with the deep state actors and all of it against trump. >> i'm calling this, laura. this is mueller's comey moment, okay? we've had more than a year of talking about jim comey's atrocious behavior in july of 2016 where he chose to go out and berate hillary clinton, but not bring any charges against her. we've had the attorney general. we've had the deputy attorney general, we've had prior attorney generals, all mentioned that this is absolutely inappropriate behavior. you don't throw a bunch of innuendo out there if you're not going to bring a charge, right? what did bob mueller do? in his second volume of his report?

he wouldn't bring charges against donald trump. he throws out -- he uses the power he has for grand juries, the compelling of witnesses. he throws it out for public consumption or congress and impeachment while not bringing any charges himself. jim comey was fired for doing exactly that. >> you just made me think of this. it also kind of reminds me of when in the fisa application, they didn't state that the dossier was paid for by the clinton campaign. and in the report, they don't state that the lawyer worked with fusion gps, which is -- had the relationship with clinton. it's like a double track deal. it's bizarre. >> examples of it everywhere, all through the mueller report. you can barely find a reference in the dossier. let's be honest, the entire are or one of the main reasons i should say, the fbi was conducting this investigation was because of the information

in the dossier. one of the reasons we ended up with the special counsel probe was because of this dossier. how do you write a 448-page report and never mention the dossier? i mean -- >> it's embarrassing for them. >> well, right. because they know that now everything that was in it has been discredited. they couldn't verify any of it. and so to acknowledge that would be a dramatic knock on the fbi. and, of course, the report was all about exonerating the fbi and jim comey and making up for the fact that he was fired, etc. >> but carter page gave a few lectures in moscow. so he's someone they needed to surveil. that whole section of the report is ridiculous as well. kim, phenomenal reporting on the entire saga. a lot more to come. we really, really appreciate your voice out there. thanks so much. >> you too, laura. thanks. >> up next, what about the folks that the mueller investigation chewed up and spit out. we taked to a few of them asking simple questions. what's next for you?

what's next for you? their answers in moments. or this john smith. or any of the other hundreds of john smiths that are humana medicare advantage members. no, it's this john smith. who we paired with a humana team member to help address his own specific health needs. at humana, we take a personal approach to your health, to provide care that's just as unique as you are. no matter what your name is. ♪

- there but what are wes to get our messactually saying?ys.is. any message is a story. and all stories tell the tale of the times we live in right now. how do you want to be remembered? how do you want your story to play out? our own experiences make the best stories, and your words carry a lot of weight. think about what you want to say before you say it. or send it.

two years, uncertain future, that's the current reality for

former trump associates that the mueller team ripped through in their extensive and intrusive investigation. now that we have most of the mueller drama wrapped up, we thought it would be a good time to check in on a few of them and ask this question -- what's next for you. to tell us what they said, we're joined by trace gallagher in the west coast newsroom, trace? >> with the release of the mueller report, president trump has declared victory and is vowing to investigate the investigators, democratic lawmakers are crying foul in what the unredacted report along with public hearing. as you said, what about those dragged into the mueller report who don't have thousands of twitter followers or anyone in the media like george papadop papadopolous who pleaded guilty of making false statements to the fbi. he was sentenced to 14 days in jail. we checked in on him on life post mueller. he called ate witch hunt aimed

at people with foreign policies he did not agree with. he's developing a docu-series and published a book titled deep state target and he told us he's been approached by the republican party regarding a congressional run. former aide michael caputo has long condemned the russian probe for the intense scrutiny it put him and his family under. he told us today the report's release doesn't change much. he still gets death threats saying we are wiped out financially, we lost our family business, income, and my life savings, trying to get back to work, the russian hoax has clearly kneecaped my reputation. caputo has wrote a book, producing a film, and, quote, trying to celebrate life without robert mueller trying to turn every breath i take into a crime scene. and former trump campaign advisor carter paige is taking action today filing a civil suit against a broadcasting board of governors regarding defamatory remarks made about him over the

years. the suit said he had to change his location frequently, quote, as a protected defense to minimize the risk of repeated threats against his life, resembling domestic terrorism and calls out the myriad of authors and the managers who created the incessant risks to dr. page's life with their false reporting. while the mueller report may be done for some, the effects for others may linger for years. laura. >> trace, glad you did the report. extremely important for people to remember the human carnage left behind. thanks so much. we'll be back with the last bite.

it's time for the last bite. a swing state voter's message to democrats now that mueller and his report finally over. >> i think they just need to move on and just drop it, you know? they just keep going forward, they're not going to get anywhere. they're just destroying themselves. >> well, just a regular american, the democrats keep harping on the report, nothing but the report. what are they going to run on in 2020? bob mueller? redocs? well, maybe that ends up being a good thing. all right, i'm off next week. it's easter break for us. all of the time we have for tonight, make sure we mention our pod cast. going to love it. dissect the entire mueller report. go to pod cast 1.com and the

apple itunes. listen and subscribe there. a wonderful easter and a meaningful blessed passover, shannon bream and the fox news at night team take it all from here. >> shannon: we begin with a fox news report. multiple reports that joe biden may announce the campaign for president. on wednesday, in the city that was the scene of a deadly clash between white supremacist and atifa among others, the past positions on hot button race issues. president trump said it's time to turn the table on investigators. he's calling them sick and dangerous people who may have committed treason. and signs that top democrats are open to pursuing impeachment. it's the holiest time