minor injuries but she is e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e en instagram and facebook and twitter and "justice with judge jeanine" is next. i am waters and this is my world. ♪ jeanine: hello welcome to "justice with judge jeanine" thank you for being with us tonight. and thank you for making last week's justice number one in viewers all day all night saturday and sunday. we have a special show on tap tonight in the wake of the mueller report and with the trump derangement syndrome. here to talk about it is trump's attorney rudy giuliani and kelly and conway what a show but first my open. are you fed up yet more than two years on stopped

precedented maligning by the media by the high-level obama administration officials and disgruntled and arrange democrats over a commander-in-chief as an agent of a foreign government. a treasonous dictator. all because they'd despise the outsider president we put in the office. enough. the system worked in the process is over. occlusion. note - - no collusion. enough families destroyed. they took down people having nothing to do with russia and they never prosecuted anyone on the campaign or even an american for collusion. all the while remaining focused determined to execute the mission to which he was

elected. you ever seen a man faced the onslaught of incoming every day as the haters attempt to take down his family saying they would be indicted any minute and still forge ahead on american's behalf? it makes our economy stronger and the country safer. have you ever seen a man willing to poke the eye of the tiger not claiming executive privilege? surrounded by wimps like former jeff sessions who hid under his desk while attorney general holder under obama was held in contempt of congress but brock loved his wing man. i will not dwell that collusion with russia was bonnie and clyde of politics bill and hillary selling our uranium to russia pocketing

$145 million through their charity. or obama to say there's no way russia could hack into the 2016 election. i guess he was wrong. and obama stood by to watch russia invade ukraine or crimea. joe biden insisted the ukrainian prosecutor be fired because he was investigated joe son doing business in the ukraine. but the left complains. they don't like that redaction's which are required by the department of justice. they hate attorney general bar they will read every word to bring down that 18 lawyers thousands of lawyers and $35 million and search warrants could not.

>> if this were you or me or anybody except the president we would have been indicted. mueller makes that pretty clear. very clear. so as of this moment donald trump walks. >> it is important to note the facts that are now established by this report are damning whether they could or should have resulted in the indictment of the president they are damning. >> i think they could make some sophisticated judgments about their president it is a piece of business. >> not only a sweeping indictment of obstruction but also a portrait of deeply unethical conduct.

>> he is not fit to be president of the united states. anybody who suggest otherwise has not read the report. jeanine: i have read the report and you are wrong. you cannot impeach a sitting - - a sitting president if mueller says you cannot exonerate the president of obstruction. if there is not sufficient evidence of a charge than that should have been the end of it. that in the show of political horrormanship you couldn't give the democrats something to work with. now 18 more months of this. >> i will fight every day until he is impeached.

impeach 45. [applause] jeanine: prosecutors don't say they can exonerate. take it from me. mueller slamming the guy on his way out was meant to satisfy his unsatisfied clients, the democrats. by the way i have been paneled and presented to many grand juries you don't say i did not indict him but i couldn't exonerate i have never seen that nor has anyone i've ever worked with. if you don't then you keep your mouth shut but apparently mueller likes the chaos and seeing the country in turmoil. so now people say it's over the liars and the leakers in the liberals will not stop they prefer to take down the institution of the presidency to destroy him at every turn despite the economy and american is a giant on the world stage again.

should we just move on? no. we cannot. there are people at the highest level of our government possibly as high as the white house who chose to change the rules and violate the law, leak information, search warrants unverified position papers america cannot afford to turn away from the crimes that was committed to frame the presiden president. the lies and dishonesty, perjury, invasio dishonesty, perjury, invasion, s used by individuals who hated the outsider. jim comey, andrew mccabe, loretta lynch, they need to field the justice they tried to impose on an innocent man. they created a blueprint. but justice doesn't care about

party affiliations, colors, gender lady justice cares about corruption. law and order. our forefathers did too that's why our constitution must be respected. and these people work to prevent donald trump from gaining the presidency and then try to make sure he was impeached. we cannot afford to let them walk away unscathed. you can be an opposing party but you cannot do that to lady justice. attorney general bar is a no-nonsense straight shooter who doesn't care what you say or think about him. a true warrior i do believe he will follow through as his mission is attorney general at finally at long last spring justice to the people who

really deserve it. that is my open. let me think on - - let me know what you think. and hear what the reaction with the release of the mueller report rudy giuliani who joins me now and is no doubt exhausted. good evening mister mayor. [laughter] >> how are you? good to see you. jeanine: we are both lawyers. in your lifetime have you ever heard a prosecutor say we will not indict but i cannot exonerate. have you heard that? be mac i was sitting away locked away in the justice department last tuesday is on the second page of volume too that's where i started. i can't repeat what i said. made me cocounsel was with me

and we all said this will be an illegitimate document a week ridiculous burden of proof you have to prove your innocence? i thought we were in america. i'm glad they did that because they proved that he was right. >> what has anybody ever been required? how do you prove a negative? if you read the report that's why a one-sided view they cannot prove half of it. everything in that :-colon section you could burn it. jeanine: interesting. >> does anybody believe michael cohen would he pass ten minutes of

cross-examination? jeanine: if you have a brett kavanaugh he is presumed guilty that presumption of innocence does not apply in that it is a sad commentary and americans are looking at that. jerry nadler we both know is a long time hater of the president from new york days now he wants the unredacted copy. [laughter] what makes him think he is entitled? and what would he do with it? >> first of all as far as i am concerned he can have it but i'm not the attorney general. this is the same who fought like a maniac because unfair

to president trump does not matter. if you look at the two volumes the redaction take place under collusion because it involved national security and basically in the obstruction of 200 pages no more than two pages redacted and they are footnotes i that he doesn't read the footnotes. jeanine: the categories are clear it is grand jury material. we are not making it up so i don't know the problem on that one. but what do you think he will do with this? >> the one thing that is clear they did not find enough evidence to justify the charge.

they say we cannot conclude that there is not enough evidence to show that he committed a crime so that is the end of it. the rules of ethics say you keep quiet for a good reason. i could point to all sorts of things about michael cohen that he lies about some of that they know and they are withholding. having done that but i said to me cocounsel there is nothing new here we are fine. the only thing that makes it a little deceptive they put all the garbage in one place. jeanine: they did and

categorized it for us but no surprise they hate anybody who is in favor of those rules. but attorney general bar is not even required to release the report it is written to be given to the attorney general. everybody criticizes him he did everything he could to do the required reductions in the summary and they are still gunning for him. >> i cannot understand it nobody believes that. just look at the law and listen to them and his background, it is completely phony garbage. nadler or somebody else called him a political hack. that is ridiculous. he has been a distinguished lawyer, former attorney genera general, confirmed

unanimously when bush nominated him, should have that now. jeanine: like 93 / seven. >> pretty close to unanimous. we know him. a very distinguished member of the bar. he will not put his reputation in jeopardy. the president trump in the media people who hate him getting praised for a sense of law and justice and sanity to become a media circus. jeanine: rudy giuliani thank you for being with us tonight. >> you are always the best. >> joining me with more is kellyanne conway good evening. >> good evening. jeanine: we were talking about the standards are changing depending on who was on the other end of the investigation.

it seems like guilt and innocence are the words of the past. is there not a nuance? >> you are absolutely correct why that those words of everyday lexicon like collusion were introduced so people think that is a serious presidential crime. first of all the investigation by mister mueller has nothing to do with guilt or innocence is not a criminal prosecution but investigation. failed to conclude the president has committed a crime or senior advisers. as a campaign manager at the end part of the campaign, it is a relief and a terrible disappointment and a tomb is character of justice for people to pretend any of us would have willingly conspired with a foreign agent to publish damaging information

try to cut corners to a democratically elected president they tried to have an asterisk next to his election and campaign also people are attacking attorney general bar viciously for another reason and with the deputy attorney general and the office of legal counsel who all said they could not conclude the president had in fact done anything to obstruct justice. that is key. if you don't like the message you attack the messenger so the interesting thing is that there is no underlying crime

because they don't have that intent. it is so amazing with hillary clinton and saying she didn't have that intent everything is backwards one of the things that the president said that i found so important is no other president should ever have to go through this again. because no other man could have gone through that and face like he did every day and then deliver for us and watch the people around him collapse in terms of their ability to respond how do we stop that? >> it's true. the real rebuttal for donald trump is the reelection the media has wasted so much time looking for a way to get him out of office and it has had the opposite effect the

media's numbers are way down nancy pelosi steny hoyer and the presidential field saying we are not talking about impeachment right now. they know there is not a part of black appetite to know how this all started in the first place so to investigate the investigators. if you are interested in knowing why people were trying to undo the election results beginning the day he was elected and the obama administration ignored the threats they received about russian interference. they thought she would win so nobody bothered. they did not take it seriously. but we are. also i see comments in the mueller report as i was reading it i have never heard

him one time say this is the end of my candidacy this is the end of my presidency even with some tough situations together that is not the way he speaks. he has weathered situations that may have broken another man or woman. but all the while giving us the best economy we have ever seen. he has done all of that under this so imagine what he can do now when it is over. jeanine: thank you for being with us kellyanne conway. >> thank you. jeanine: judicial watch has gone through the mueller report. more next and the man who help john to get to the white house corey lewandowski and the president's response in a

voting for your favorite dancers on our show has never been easier. just say "vote for world of dance" into your xfinity v-mo. um jennifer, it's called a voice remote, not a v-mo. yeah, i just think v-mo has a nicer ring to it. so, just say "vote for world of dance" into your xfinity v-mo to choose your xfinity fan favorite to join the world of dance experience

on my "it's my party" summer tour. cast your vote by saying "vote for world of dance" into your xfinity x1 voice remote. or as j-lo likes to call it, your v-mo. jeanine . >> attorney general did a great disservice to the country to misrepresent significant parts of the mueller report. attempting to put a positive spin toward the president on the special counsel's findings. with the attorney general gives the perception they fully cooperated when he didn't provided all the information and materials when they didn't and the president deprived the special counsel of his own verbal testimony that misleads the american people. jeanine: that is adam schiff

attacking attorney general bar's character. now we go to the campaign manager corey lewandowski. hears what bothers me. the attorney general has a disservice to misrepresent significant parts of the mueller report. first, it is for the attorney general he did not even have to release it. number two the attorney general makes the decision ultimately asked to obstruction because mueller could not do that himself so it is amazing he has been jumping the campus saying there is evidence and now may be changing his tune. >> this guy has lied to the american people over two and half years to say he has found

and seen overwhelming evidence this president colluded with russia with egg on his face now he's trying to walk it back in point the blame as somebody else specifically a man whose reputation should be intact turning over the report in a timely manner to show there was no collusion or coordination between the trump campaign at any given time but adam schiff does not want to hear that. jeanine: now steny hoyer says we don't want impeachment which i think is a smart move because the american people are fed up to here with it. and then there are those like jerry nadler who look at every

word and what it means to change the presumption of innocence with the laws of the justice department. >> judge, they are actually disappointed the president is not a criminal they hate this president more than they love their country they want to investigate somebody they will never give him a break. i was there from the very beginning i still have the privilege to spend time with the president on a regular basis but i told him there was no collusion from day number $125,000,000.40 fbi agents they came to the same conclusion i would is there he won fair and square they don't want to give him the respect and dignity he deserves for beating hillary. jeanine: kellyanne conway said

she never heard the president talk like it's the end of my presidency. now i have known a man for almost three decades and that is not how this man response to anything. it's over. the walls are closing in. that is not donald trump. he pokes the eye of the tiger by walking into the cage so these things that people say i just don't believe because i know the president but let's talk about the fact with this situation the 2020 candidate is on the left most of them hate donald trump went out the possibility of joe biden i don't think that will change things because he seems to be pulling rather well.

>> just to go back to the earlier point hundreds of thousands of times i've talked to donald trump i've never heard him be debbie downer. he is a winner with television, books, politics, rel estate that anybody says he is debbie downer all of a sudden is a liar. jeanine: i agree. coming to uncle joe crazy hair sniffing uncle joe his friends are destroying him already his friends in washington are putting out the opposition research it is in the trump campaign reminding the failures as a us senator or eight years as a democratic vice president. his friends remind everybody you haven't done enough for minorities or women an old white guy who was a lot of explaining to do.

his friends will come after him before donald trump gets a hold of him. jeanine: thank you for being with us tonight corey lewandowski. radio show host from judicial watch standing by next. one report and two very different takes. and then our political panel ready to debate the mueller report and what happens next on capitol h to

reach a firm conclusion. now back to "justice with judge jeanine". jeanine. >> with considerable evidence of obstruction of justice is what mueller is saying laying that out to congress to pursue that. but attorney general bar took it upon himself to clear the president. it is not up to him we need the whole report including the

underlying documents unredacted. jeanine: no collusion or obstruction but the mueller report thinks that congress wants to pick up obstruction of justice on its own democrats are laser focus to find wrongdoing by the president but should congress allow endless investigations? former aide to chuck schumer. this is interesting to listen to jerry nadler say there is considerable evidence but if there was considerable evidence why don't you tell me why robert mueller indicts the president for obstruction of justice he would have but the president could not be exonerated and there were multiple examples of the staff telling the president to fire mueller including your last

test that right there is obstruction. i ask this to every conservative if this was obama what would you say? lindsey graham indicted and prosecuted bill clinton for obstruction of justice on less evidence. i do not think there will be an impeachment it will be determined in the election as it should be but the american people should know the full extent under oath. jeanine: but you know chris that mueller works for bar he has the umbrella and the power and give that to attorney general bar he has the authority to make the decision and mueller prince it. so now what is the response to that must be exhausted today with all the goalpost shifting it is amazing this whole conversation is about obstruction democrats and the

media are totally forgetting about the whole reason of the investigation was collusion. we were promised there would be evidence the campaign colluded with the russians. that did not happen. they lied to us. high-profile democrats saying they promised they saw evidence and that is a lie. it is astounding where they are today with the mueller report. he did not exonerate him because that was not his job to do that and president trump is presumed innocent he doesn't have to prove his innocence in this cas case. jeanine: how do you prove a negative? but in the end did it take two years to figure this out? i read the report.

michael cohen was a real treat. congress calls them back and then they say he would be good for obstruction? it is stunning that people are even interested in what that guy has to say . >> when it comes to the issue of collusion there were attempts it just never happened but no ability to do it. they were on the same path trying to accomplish the same goal and the trump campaign team did not rise to that level although he was happy about if you read the report i do agree with the report i will not push it but it is not in the best interest of the american people. jeanine: donald trump is a man who doesn't need to go through someone to get something done. if he wanted sessions fired he would have fired him or

recused him or what was the other one? donald trump has conversations. >> but in that case it is he said versus he says we don't even know what happened in that conversation. but now democrats are jumping around trying to hang on every single word that was said there should be no obstruction because there was no collusion there was no valid reason to investigate trump in this case. and he said very clearly today this was put together by 18 angry democrats so no indictments were recommended.

so the president is exonerated in this case. >> you and i were both attorneys your honor. where the underlying crime cannot be proven. jeanine: but let's be fair i was a prosecutor. making a decision whether or not to go forward but these people are not progressive they are hired by donald trump to work for donald trump he orders him on a saturday night to fire the special counsel is something that should happen if it had everybody would be screaming right now so there's

not a lot to hold them back. jeanine: they complain the president stated on 30 occasions he said he did not recall do you remember jim comey saying he could not recall 245 times and they want to trash the president? >> i do remember. now we are playing by different rules the democrats talk about looking into trump's taxes, subpoena over xyz. they move the goalpost playing by different rules. nadler once the unredacted report but was singing a different tune during the clinton investigation. >> and how many times did hillary clinton say she did not know? jeanine: thank you. one of the elite leading conservative voices in america

gives us his opinion joining us in just a moment you don't want to miss thi

jeanine: the collusion delusion with the mainstream media wants to talk about the last two years i have a feeling it will only continue with the 2020 democratic candidates trying to run against president trumper, let's ask my next guest dennis prager good to have you with us tonight. >> it is great to be with you that the subject is infuriating.

look at the headline of the new york times i could spend an hour on this. jeanine: weight. can you see it? yes. it is amazing raising one --dash with the context that is the banner headline what about a more honest headline? the united states of america has been fooled for two years by our paper and all the other major media and the democratic party and hollywood over something that never happened. isn't that a much more accurate headline? jeanine: the joke is on you. that would be a better headline but in truth with all due respect to them it will keep going for the next 18 months adam schiff will not give this up but if you look

at this philosophical way at 30000 feet how do you look at this how do they look at what happened during the first two years of this man's presidency? >> there was a concerted effort of the two major parties of all major news and entertainment media of the united states to perpetrate the idea that something happened that nothing happened that never happened while the president said constantly it was a witch hunt. 100 percent accurate to say that and they persisted in doing that because truth became less important than undoing the election of the year 2016 that is the way it will be looked at in the future.

>> and the basic fundamentals of our constitution upended because he is the president when there is a republic - - republican who lose their protection and constitutional right it is frightening to me from someone who believes in law and order. >> most americans don't know this but ruth bader ginsburg we have a recording actually, she did not hide it she was in cairo talking about egypt adopting a new constitution or other third world countries and said if i were to recommend a constitution i would not recommend any country adopt the united states constitution south africa was a much better example.

she was honest enough to say she has taken a vow to protect the document is morally and legally inferior to almost any other. that is the way the left regards the constitution as essentially worthless. so there is a crisis but i go back to the truth that they lied for two years talking about philosophy. if you believe your lie are you lying? not to be cute it is a moral problem i think they start at a given point to believe what they make up to be true to say they are lying is true but i am not sure that they know that tonight and to be on top of

the plot to take down president trump from the beginning and tonight is here to give us his take on the molar repo

jeanine: no collusion but like i said tonight, we cannot just move on those that orchestrated the hoax need to be brought to justice. tom, one of the things that concerns me as i look back and it will take a while to get to the point where it is a given with no collusion that you had

people, the head of the fbi the deputy director and peter strock and loretta lynch. and then clapper and brennan. i have a bone to pick with both of them. first of all clapper basically said what happened if there wasn't actual collusion proven it was passive collusion what is he talking about? >> they are trying desperately to hold on and keep propped up the hoax and a knowing lie. they knew there was no collusion. trying to bring in the pretextual intelligence reports working with the clinton campaign as part of that to go after president

trump with the unprecedented spying campaign. not just the doj or fbi the nsa, office director of national intelligence they were all part of this all hands on deck going after kennedy trump and then it morphed into the mueller investigation. so there never should have been a report for qwest far as i am concerned this is another abuse of power by the special counsel operation designed to hamper the president as to oppose to shed light on anything substantial. jeanine: and because we are short of time i only have one more question but when people like brennan say those actions

are treasonous but then they continue to do this, there has to be an investigation? do you agree we have to put an end to this as people lie to congress that there has to be criminal accountability? >> i would walk over to the washington field office and lodge a criminal complaint. he is a crime victim people who abuse their office for political purposes they victimized him and many others

judge jeanine: riley tonight,

first look at my next brand-new book, radicals, resistance in revenge. the left plot to remake america. i can't wait for all of you read it would wish those of you celebrating tomorrow a very happy easter. i'm jeanine. advocating for truth, justice an a a a a a a a a a a a a a a . by my book on amazon. greg gutfeld is next to back the portion about subjecting who we charged criminally in this country and making this by popular demand doesn't work that way. >> hold on. >> abbey what was that? [laughter] greg: that is where doctor went. [applause] i am worried. all this good news has someone checked in on the press?