but we will be back and that is ourt promise to you. tomorrow night at 8:00 p.m. the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, thand groupthink. don't go away, we have fantastic news for you. by prearrangement, sean hannity will be hosting the 9:00 p.m. show. >> sean: and 23 hours, surprisingly, tucker is going to be back. i had to think about that one. tucker, great show. buckle up and welcome to "hannity." tonight, mass rage totally consuming the modern democratic socialist party. of course after president trump was vindicated by robert mueller and for the left, it is like a election night 2016 all over again because for two and a half years, democrats along with their partners in the media mob are pumping up their base. they get giddy and praised their hero robert mueller because they were finally going to get donald trump. it's like the exit polls showed he was going to lose and they were wrong.

the facts of reality got in the way becauseth there never was collusion, no conspiracy, no obstruction from trump and his campaign. now democrats are deflated and downtrodden and they are hitting levels of delusion with reckless fantasies about impeachment and doing everything they can possibly do to harass, even use the irs against a sitting president. tonight, we are exposing it piece by piece, and we are also going to be asking the most important unanswered questions. by the way, there are hundreds of them. we are giving you the top ones, like when did robert mueller know there was no collusion, no coordination? why weren't we told? why did they hold that back? if they knew there was no crime all along early on in the investigation, why not let the american people, we, the people know? to reveal to we, the people, that this was all based on a w series of false narratives and phony allegations, like the steele dossier? what didn't they investigate this which, was like a final

nail drilled in the coffin by robert mueller? byron york writes in the "washington examiner" today, "in the wake of the mueller report, the question is not whether the dossier's charges were accurate but why were theye so wrong?" even our friend bob woodward is acknowledging the problems with clinton's bought and paid for russian lies used in the election. i guess better late than never.. take a look. >> early in building the intelligence community assessment on russian interference, in an early draft, they actually put the dossier on page two in kind of a breakout box. i think it was the cia pushing this.. real intelligence experts looked at this and said, no, this is not intelligence. this is garbage and they took it out. but in this process the idea

that they would include something like that in one of the great, stellar intelligence assessments, as mueller also found out, is highly questionable. it needs to be investigated. >> sean: highly questionable. bob, again, we had an ensemble team for over two years, we have been peeling the layers after layer after layer of the biggest abuse of power corruption scandal in our history. this ensemble cast on radio and tv and my show, we have been right all along and now even "the new york times," even they are coming to terms with somes dose of reality, revealing in a new piece that the dossier is now under renewed scrutiny. baby steps for them. get this: the media may have been more wrong than we thought. according to "the times," the dossier may have been a part of a russian disinformation

campaign to begin with. hillary's campaign, she paid for it. not to help donald trump, but to set up "landmines and sow chaos and discord among the american electorate." john solomon will join us in a few moments to explain more to you but ask yourself, when will the fake news media mob apologize for their lies and conspiracy theories? whenap will they take accountability? when will they take account for fueling collusion, hysteria, breathless reporting? day after day, night after night. in the media, facts were only an afterthought, any anonymous source, yes, they believed like buzzfeed's bombshell about the president having the president's lie which is totally false or npr being embarrassed after it lied about don jr.'s senate testimony. or mcclatchey blatantly wrong

about michael cohen's trip to prague. it never happened. "the guardian" reported a fake conspiracy about julian assage. three cnn employees forced to resign after reporting an untrue russia-related story about our friend, the mooch, anthony scaramucci. or brian ross leaving abc after a fake news story i found trump in russia that actually impacted negatively the stock market. it was fake hysteria about a russian spy in the white house or bloomberg forced to correct their story about trump and deutsche bank. "the new york times" walking claims back about paul manafort sharing polling data with the utrussian oligarch. don't forget "the washington post" having to correct their story about russians hacking a vermont utility which wasn't true. it was every second, every hour, every day, fake story after fake story, lie after lie, conspiracy after conspiracy theory. rather than take responsibility for all of these failures, an epic fail, the media is sinking to new lows.

doubling down on lies and stupid. look at how a so-called reporter at nbc news literally ambushed robert mueller as he is leaving easter services. these people have no shame. take a look. >> sir, can i ask you a couple of questions? will you testify before congress, sir? >> no comment. >> are you sure about that? >> no comment. >> if he were anybody but the president, what mr. trump be indicted? why didn't you make a recommendation to congress one way or the other? did the attorney general accurately characterize your positions on conspiracy and obstruction? >> sean: could we make churches out-of-bounds? kids out-of-bounds? the hysteria, so many stunanswered questions. this is really only the first chapter in what must be a reckoning for the country.

if this country is to survive, it is that serious. literally, we will shine the light now on the ten biggest and there are hundreds unanswered questions. when did the fbi first realize that the dossier was bought and paid for by hillary clinton and if they knew it, why didn't mueller investigate that when they're investigating a whole issue of russian interference? how much exculpatory evidence they have about george papadopoulos, carter page and did they hide that information from the fisa court? we have a question for james comey, why did james comey say signed the first warrant, it was the dossier. why did he sign it, which means he approved it, assuming it's verified in october 2016, and tell trump, then

president-elect, 2017, trump tower in january, it is salacious but unverified? he lied. by the way, why were steele's anti-trump biases hid from the fisa court? like hillary bought and paid for that in big bold letters. why were u.s. intel officials leaking details on the russia probe before ever corroborating anything to do with collusion? next question, did james comey mishandle classified information when leaking memos from hisnf private conversations with the president? and here's a big one. okay, let's go to the obama white house. what did susan rice, samantha let me see, john brennan and clapper, what did they know and when did they know what? what did obama know and when did he know it? if, as lisa page and peter strzok were saying, they were running the whole thing from the justice department? cia or fbi, did they engage or sign off on surveillance against

the trump team to spy on them before opening the so-called investigation? in other words, did they bypass american laws about abusing intelligence and using the weapons of intelligence against the american people and outsource that to friendly allies and get information they wouldn't otherwise get? maybe places like the u.k. to gather evidence on the trump campaign or maybe australia or italy. did the cia try to pressure of the fbi into opening a trump collusion probe before the election? we do need to know, considering it was so important, issues like loan applications, taxes, and taxi medallions. who else lied to congress? we know andrew mccabe is being probed for a false testimony but he also said no dossier, no fisa warrant. his testimony contradicts thato of glenn simpson at fusion gps.

somebody lied, somebody told the truth, and that all conflicts with what bruce ohr said. let's go back to loretta lynch, what did she know and what did know it? john brennan, james clapper, when did they know what? we are inching closer and closer to justice, there is no stopping this abuse of power and corruption from being exposed. that i can promise you tonight. it is time for transparency and accountability. we cannot let this happen in our country. my sources are telling me, it is all coming soon. it is time to declassify those fisa applications. bruce ohr's 302, which we call the bucket of five, we still have the ig horwitz, he is expected later this spring with his report on fisa abuse. the john huber report on making your views, the gang of eight material. let's see it all. democrats want transparency, okay, absolutely. let's expose the biggest abuse

of powerpl corruption scandal in our history. the american people will be shocked. let's expose the new radical democratic socialist party, still hell-bent on spreading lies every second, every hour of every day. a public trial. when the democrats aren't fueling their unhinged hysteria, let not your hearts be troubled because their cohorts in the hate trump media mob pick up the slack. take a look. >> if the main concern here is that he is not going to be convicted by the senate, democrats may be making a bad political calculation.ot >> it's not as of the mueller report was a dud. it has a lot to do that implicates a president is an actual crimes. >> i still hope that in this day and age republicans will see the facts and will be as appalled as democrats are. >> this report was completely exposing of unfit, impeachable behavior. >> an innocent man does not screech and complain. >> so might ask, why haven't you

started, whyhy haven't you opend an impeachment inquiry or in fairness, is that what you are doing right now? >> how much does the politics matter? >> impeachment gets politicized so you have a legal case that you believe this happens and you should do it but the politics dictate something else. how will that influence this decision? is this in nancy pelosi's hands? >> sean: we know democrats aren't interested in the truth. even speaker pelosi downplaying impeachment. writing there are other ways to hold the president accountable. she scared t to death, knowing e political ramifications, this witch hunt continuing will mean for the democratic party in her power. those sentiments echoed by democratic leaders in a call earlier today. that is not stopping the radical base of the new extreme radical socialist democratic party. collusion truth here, the biggest lie of them all,

adam the cowardly schiff saying the report proved him right. you can't make this stuff up and i will say it again, you are welcome on the show anytime. you want a full hour and i will give you three hours of my radio show if you would like, 650 stations and a big audience. congressman, you are welcome any time. that goes for the rest of them if they want to be a part of it. as we continue along, anybody that wants to be a part of this program, we will expose the lies of people like them. you know what? how much hurting you are doing to the american people. the real colluded-er in all ofw this is only one person and we have evidence for it, comedic gold. here's this on tape. collusion with russia to impact our elections. >> she met with trump. she brought him russian girl, celebrity, also known as a person with a strange reputation. >> how do you spell her name? what is the nature of the

kompromat? >> there were pictures of naked trump. >> was vladimir putin made aware of thewa availability of the compromising material? >> yes, of course. >> we will be back in touch with you through our staff to make arrangements to obtain these materials for committee and for the fbi and i appreciate youem reaching out to us. >> sean: what is the nature of the kompromat? naked trump. did vladimir putin see it? of course. vladimir see it. you can't make this stuff up. we have devin nunes, we warned about russia and putin, hostile actors on the world stage. devin nunes in 2014 warned the obama administration it all happened on their watch that this would happen in 2016. this is who they are and what they do and after 30 plus years after our government being hacked, can we please build defenses to be un-hackable? we should all be concerned aboue

the integrity of our elections and the fact that this government has been hacked repeatedly for decades by hostile regimes. we need a top to bottom killerer defense procedure against these hackers. that is why hillary clinton's email server is a real threat to our safety and security. we believe that place was hacked by at least six foreign entities. this was all weaponized in the press in the deep state to bludgeon donald trump. behind the curtain, we got lies, it is time to investigate the investigators. that means hillary clinton and the fact that that investigation was rigged and then they tried to rig the presidential election and undo a duly elected president. the media was all there. let's stick to the facts and not rush to judgment. maybe the media can self-reflect

and not jump onto the next fake news story about theth presiden, especially common sense and have america wake up to their lies and smears. they attacked him with investigations and anonymous sources and thankfully he is fighting back. just today the president filed a lawsuit against the democrats' latest stunt. now they want to embolden the irs and release his taxes, explaining that the boy has no legitimate purpose. not once did he invoke executive privilege. 1.5 million documents. even donald mcgahn, the white house counsel, 30 hours before mueller. do you see what isto going on? they are out of ideas.ey no ideas for the betterment of the people. they sink to a psychotic low and this is all they think about. when they are not pushing endless investigations, nonstopt far left socialism or bludgeoning a 16-year-old kid. you want to see radical socialism? look at comrade mayor of new york city announcing to ban "inefficient steel and glass

skyscrapers" from new work! retrofit every big building in new york. take a look. >> the biggest source of emissions in new york city is buildings. we are putting on clear, strong mandates, the first of any city on earth to say to building owners, you have to clean up your act and save energy.nd if you don't do it by 2030 there will be serious fines. we will ban the classic glass and steel skyscrapers, which are incredibly inefficient. if somebody wants to build one, they could take a whole lot of steps to make it energy-efficient but we will not allow what we used to see in the past. >> sean: no glass and steel, how will we build those buildings? you can't build those with timber because that would be killing a tree. no gas, no oil, no cars, no engines, no planes but everything is free. they don't even meet these standards, they are so over the top. ocasio-cortez wants every building in america retrofitted. wow, who will pay for that? here with reaction, the author

of the introduction to the mueller report, alan dershowitz and "the hill"'s john solomon. let me start with you, and i especially want to go over the media and i know, professor, you have a lot to say about this as well. >> there has been a few suggestions maybe the media should apologize. i think it has a more important step to take first. it needs to retract the storiess that are now demonstrably false ords demonstrably unproven. once declared drew, now demonstrably proven false. mueller's report lays bare at least a dozen of what i would call dirty dozen stories that are clearly false and some of them are in big publications like "the new york times," like cnn. the writing and journalism is when you are wrong, admit you mare wrong, retract a story, ad move on. that hasn't happened in more than a dozen very important cases.th the media comes out as a loser in this report until they fix those. a

>> sean: what about the mueller report containing damaging information on rod rosenstein? nobody really has picked up on that. >> if people flip to page 11 on dershowitz's new book will see this really remarkable statement. he says the scoping memo gave him the ability to look at carter page's contacts with a senior russian intelligence officials and those never happened but where did that information come from? the steele dossier. that means a year into the investigation, the justice department under rod rosenstein empowered mueller based on the document that we now b know was full of holes and probably almost entirely false. probably a dirty trick by the russians on the american public. that is one of the most admissions in the report. hasn't gotten a lot of attention. i think rod rosenstein has a good question to answer which is why would you use the dossier when the fbi knew at that point it wasn'tse accurate? >> sean: professor, i read your comments about cnn. i guess you're talking about the attorney, whatever his name is.

here's the important thing. avenatti or -- but here's the important thing. there are civil liberties at stake. where are all the people on the left who used to care about civil liberties, because there was one american, because of a phony dossier, that lost his constitutional rights, and that dossier was the bulk of information. he said no dossier, no fisa warrant. that was never verified but it was signed off on four times. not only a spying insert into the president's campaign, but also american citizens were hura here. >> it's not only one american who lost his civil liberties. because an investigation was opened. all americans have their civil liberties compromised. when you have a dossier presented to the fisa court and presented as the whole truth, when the justice department withheld relevant material. if they can do it to the president of the united states,

they can do it to any of us, any citizen, and when you get to the rosenstein issue, he surely should have been recused from this case and when you read the report, his role in the firing of comey is minimized. he is involved in being in charge of the investigation and yet his role is minimized because if he had played a larger role, then obviously he would've had to recuse himself because he could have been a potential defendant or a potential witness in the case. the entire obstruction of justice discussion is a c- legal discussion. the mueller report got the law completely wrong. they came to the conclusion that you could actually indict a president for exercising his constitutional authority. that is not the law and has never been the law and it neverh should be the law and every civil libertarian should be

upset about that. >> sean: you do agree we have to get to the bottom of this. >> yes. >> sean: if we don't, what you spent your career fighting for and defending and the law you have been teaching predicated on the greatest document god gave o man, the constitution, we lose it. >> absolutely. that's what i think there are two institutions that are to be looking into it. first is the inspector general. i think he is a perfect person to look into it because it takes it out of partisanship and second, the fisa court itself can appoint somebody to look as to whether or not there was contempt of court committed by people who misled them deliberately. yes, we haveth to get to the bottom of it. a nonpartisan way. >> sean: john, last word. >> that is spot on and that is underway. we have an opportunity to get to the bottom of this and find the truth. >> sean: thank you, both. professor, thank you. great work throughout all of this.>> on peeling the layers of the onion. senator graham, newt gingrich, piers morgan fired up on this busygr news week. tonight on "hannity." ♪

these folks, they don't have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again! ♪ it is such a good time to dance ♪ ♪ it is such a good time to [ laughing ] ♪ scoobidoo doobidoo ♪ scoobidoo doobidoo [ goose honking ]

♪ [ laughing ] a bad day on the road still beats a good one off it. ♪ progressive helps keep you out there.

♪ i can customize each line for each family member? yup. and since it comes with your internet, you can switch wireless carriers, and save hundreds of dollars a year. are you pullin' my leg? nope. you sure you're not pullin' my leg? i think it's your dog. oh it's him. good call. get the data options you need and still save hundreds of dollars... do you guys sell other dogs? now that's simple, easy, awesome.

customize each line by paying for data by the gig or get unlimited. and now get $100 back when you buy a new lg. click, call, or visit a store today. ♪ >> sean: the mueller report last weekend >> sean:st following there release of the mother report, questions are rightly being asked about what comes next. "mueller report punked the special counsel's work. congress was wrong. report analyzes the constitutional authority to legislate and is not upend the separation of powers by calling congress to conduct continue a completed doj investigation." joining us now, the first interview since the mueller report came out. senate judiciary chairman lindsey graham. we kind of needed you last week and i don't know where you were. we could have used you. let's get your general thoughts and reactions and what you will do. >> number one, the idea that the

mueller report is not the final word on all things trump, russian collusion, obstruction. it is news to me. i thought we all trusted mueller. here's what i think is going on in the house. there's going to be a stampede to impeach president trump. they will use the mueller report and anything they can find to try to destroy his presidency. nancy pelosi is not in charge of the democratic party. the radical left is in charge. i will expect there will belo impeachmentrt proceedings and te mueller report to me is vindication of president trump. >> sean: you said it's over and i agree with you. >> it's over for me. >> sean: let me tell you, i think we have had a nine monthte investigation by the fbi. peter strzok and page, they said there is no there there. then we had the house until committee investigation and the bipartisan investigation and now the mueller report. you can't state any more clearly, no collusion.

now the american people, the answer is in. if they want to do this on top of the green deal, what are the political ramifications for not serving the american people? >> they will get punished in 202o and i think president trump will get reelected. i know what happened in '98 when the american people understood what they got with bill clinton, they understand president trump warts and all. mueller was the guy that i was going to let look at, make sure he looked at the idea after working with the russians and the verdict is in. there was no collusion. there was no obstruction of a crime that never occurred. the obstruction thing was bizarre to me to begin with. here's what i think. they will be stampeded to impeach trump because they hate him so much and i hate it for the country and the president but it will result in him m getting reelected. the media istr not covering the trump presidency, they are trying to destroy yet. the democratic party doesn't

accept the fact that he won so at the end of the day we will have to deal with this in 2020 at the ballot box. >> sean: there are three big components. we now know the investigation with hilary was rigged. loretta lynch was running every decision. "a matter," not an investigation. then we have the attempt to use a phony russian dossier, even "the new york times" is admitting that, which is interesting. "the washington post" writing fox news was right, especially hannity. whatever. it is not about who was right but a rigged investigation and attempt to break a presidential election and then attempt to unseat a duly elected president. what will yould do specifically? >> there is before and after the campaign. before the campaign i want to find out did george papadopoulos was he working with the russians or did plant in his mind that the russians had hillary clinton's email? in other words, did the

knowledge about russia and the clinton emails come from somebody other than russia? how could you use the dossier four different times to get a warrant against an american citizen when it's garbage? why didn't they tell the court it was a politically motivated document? i will try to find out about the counterintelligence investigation and about how the fisa warrant was obtained against carter page. was there an effort to invoke the 25th amendment? was telling the truth, mccabe or rosenstein? the person who leaked "the washington post" said that general flynn was being p surveilled during the transition, if you can find outt who that person, that is the one who started all of this. >> sean: it might be a lot earlier than the date we weree told, which is july 31st. did our intelligence community outsource illegal activities to our allies to bypass american laws, intel abuse, turned on

american citizens, unmasking, leaking? a lot to get here. lying to congress. we are about to get to this. good to see you and welcome back. when we come back, an update on the terrible terror attack in sri lanka that left nearly 300 dead including americans on easter sunday. t newt gingrich and also piers morgan is on fire. we'll tell you why. ♪ but i'm relentless too. mbc doesn't take a day off, and neither will i. and i treat my mbc with everyday verzenio- the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. in fact, verzenio is a cdk4 & 6 inhibitor for postmenopausal women with hr+, her2- metastatic breast cancer, approved, with hormonal therapy, as an everyday treatment for a relentless disease. verzenio + an ai is proven to help women have significantly more time without disease progression, and more than half of women saw their tumors shrink vs an ai. diarrhea is common, may be severe, and may cause dehydration or infection. before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have

fever, chills, or other signs of infection. verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. serious liver problems can occur. symptoms may include tiredness, loss of appetite, stomach pain, and bleeding or bruising more easily than normal. blood clots that can lead to death have also occurred. talk to your doctor right away if you notice pain or swelling in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain or rapid breathing or heart rate. tell your doctor if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include nausea, infections, low red and white blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. i'm relentless. and my doctor and i choose to treat my metastatic breast cancer with verzenio. be relentless. ask your doctor about everyday verzenio.

♪ ♪ >> sean: with 290n: people killed including americans, more than 400 injured, after a radical islamic terror group sent multiple suicide bombers to detonate explosives to hotels and churches on e easter sunday in sri lanka. this comes as attacks against christians are spiking. 2018, over 4,000 christians killed for faith-related

reasons. here with reaction who wrote the new fiction novel, titled "collusion", out next tuesday and available for preorder on amazon.com. the former speaker of the house, fox news contributor newt gingrich. i'm sure it doesn't at all reflect real life events at all. >> it involves real collusion between a senate staff member and some russians want to poison the senate. it is real collusion. it's not some phony deal. >> sean: what do you think of "the new york times" even acknowledging now that they might have been a disinformation campaign, the dossier, from the very beginning? guys like bob woodward, welcome to the party. the steele dossier bought and paid for by clinton, you have to examine it further. where have they been for two years? >> i think there was a picture that had been painted that made

a lot of people who hated trump feel good and they had enormous hope that that picture was going to turn out to be reality. it was a social movement. the sort of thing you saw the middle ages where people would get swept up, the salem witchcraft trials were very similar. a mass hysteria and all of these supposedly sophisticated people go running down the road while chanting the same things. i think this is the beginning of what i hope will be a much longer and tougher self-evaluation than just saying, is it over or not over? >> sean: mr. speaker, hell will freeze over. is not going to happen. lindsey graham actually said the words that they are rushing or stampeding to impeach. do you believe that? when you couple this never ending, nonstop, use the irs

even to destroy trump psychosis with the new green deal, no oil or gas, retrofit every building. no combustion engine, planes, cows, everything is free, how does this play a politically? >> i think he just brought together three or four different streams. if you start out with the notion that ocasio-cortez and her allies are crazy, you have to decide how many americans are going to buy that. historically it is not very many. they get big coverage in the news media and they look like they are out of touch with reality. if you are talking about the democratic nominee for president, they have a huge kiproblem. they very likely will get sanders. we'll have a straight up fight. if you think socialism works, if you love venezuela, you always wanted to be in zimbabwe and you think cuba is the future, you will have a candidate.

if you like the best economy in modern times, the lowest black unemployment, the lowest latino employment, you have a different party led by donald trump. that is a big piece of this. i don't want to get off of this for a second. two big topics very quickly. there is a war against christianity. we have to be clear with that as there is a war against semitism. if you look at anti-semitic actions, in france, 4,000 anti-semitic acts last year. people are focusing on if you look at the number of churches burning down, people are focusing on notre dame because it is so big but there are a lot of other churches beingle vandalized in france. the christians being killed and i thought it was astounding that neither president obama nor secretary clinton could describe them as christians. somehow they both in parallel came up with a tern "easter

worshipers." you have to wonder, how could they both come up with the samev on the same weekend? that is an example, it is so hard for them to come to grips i with, this is a war against christianity. just as it is a war against judaism.s we ought to be clear. we need the intellectual and mental toughness to saywe this. i want to jump back to your other topic. a single example. i'm hoping that senator graham will assign somebody on his staff to go to the 500 people, 500, who had to deal with mueller and ask them, what were their legal fees? this may well have cost a half billion dollars to citizens who were totally innocent. that ought to raise some very serious fundamental questions about how this whole system is now working. frankly it is corrupt. it is an abuse of power and if you watch what is going on and look at people put away in solitaryry confinement.

cere was a woman who was in solitary confinement for thtwo-thirds of a potential term. w that was before she was convicted of anything. that is not america. i don't think we should let up on this. we should look very clearly at the report and ask a simple question for bob mueller. when did he figure out that there was nothing there? every day after that that he allowed the president of the united states to be under a cloud of suspicion, he did a disservice which weakened the united states. it didn't weaken donald trump. >> sean: how did he not look into the russian dossier? >> i think it will be healthy for people to ask him questions about the decision points and the one sidedness and frankly i think you have to go back and look at clinton and their f relationship with the russians. if there is any money relationship between the russians and american

politicians, it is bill and hillary clinton, not donald trump. i don't think this will go away. this is part of something we have to dig into. >> sean: it can't. if we don't get to the bottom of it -- this is the biggest abuse ofab power power scandal, corruption if this happens and we don't hold people accountable it will only happen again and again. we love when you're back in the states. i know you are happy at the p p avatican. i can't book you at 2:00 in the morning. it is a little difficult. >> i am here. >> sean: oh, today i am here. >> [laughs] >> sean: when we come back, jussie smollett's brother wrote an op-ed believing his brother, and you won't believe what it said. trace gallagher has that report and piers morgan has been on fire. he will tell us why straight ahead. ♪ -meg! there you are. did you take a picture of the cake

to put on our website? i mean i would have but i'm a commercial vehicle so i don't have hands... or a camera...or a website.

should we franchise? is the market ready for that? can we franchise? how do you do that? meg! oh meg! we should do that thing where you put the business cards in the fishbowl and somebody wins something. -meg: hi. i'm here for... i'm here for the evans' wedding. -we've got the cake in the back, so, yeah. -meg: thank you. -progressive knows small business makes big demands. -you're not gonna make it, you're not gonna make it! ask her if we can do her next wedding too! -so we'll design the insurance solution that fits your business. -on second thought, don't...ask that. they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again!

when it comes to reducing the evsugar in your family's diet,m. coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar. balanceus.org

♪ ♪ >> sean: the jussie smollett hate crime hoax saga is taking an interesting turn this evening after "empire"'s brother wrote an op-ed this weekend. live from our west coast newsroom, fox news correspondent trace gallagher. it's getting interesting. >> indeed, it is. >> in the essay he wrote for bet, he h says his younger brotr "in less than three months his life has been turned upside down as my family and i have witnessed him endure unrelenting attacks to his character and reputation." he goes on to say jussie he is experiencing post trauma and night terrors andos the brother blames the chicago police department for leaking information. "what concerned me the most as the chicago police department continued their campaign against jussie, i noticed an online bandwagon approaching, ignoring whether there were any

real facts to suggest his guilt." but as cook county prosecutors pointed out, there are certainly incriminating facts, like smollett saying his alleged attackers were white skinned, when in fact they were black brothers, who he knew andbr allegedly paid to help him orchestrate the pony attack, including giving them money to buy a rope, ski masks, gasoline, gloves, and red caps that resemble make america great again hats. he also asked what if jussie is telling the truth? even prosecutors who dropped the charges say, he is not telling the truth. sean? >> sean: trace gallagher with the report. joining me now, dailymail.com, has become a friend of mine and he was once a competitor. i never disliked him then except for the second amendment. we will debate that one day. >>xc [laughs] >> sean: i have come to admire

your fight, your wit, yourd humor. you are very impressive and i read your stuff all the time. liberals screaming to impeach trump, you had a -- you were on fire. >> thank you for having me and i want to offer my deepest sympathy to jussie smollett. it must be awful to have post-traumatic stress disorder from something that you faked yourself. the poor guy. our hearts go out to him. all those nightmares about did i or did i not give them the right amount of money in the check i paid to stage these guys to do this attack? do me a favor. that got me angry. let's turn to this issue of the report. there are 400 pages but what was the report to set up to be? the report was at a very clearly to investigate. mueller was to investigate whether there was a conspiracy by donald trump or his campaignn team with the russians tore

basically fix the election. i can't imagine a more serious charge against any serving president. they betrayed their country with a foreign enemy to fix a u.s. election and for two years the media in this country and the democrats and screaming liberal celebrities like jussie smollett who led the charge on this, have screamed collusion, collusion! this was a done deal. mueller was the savior, the man on the white horse riding into town to take downhe president trump on collusion with russia and he would be exposed as a traitor and this would be the end of his presidency. the mueller report comes out and it turns out it was all nonsense. it was to quote donald trump, "fake news." i turned the day after the full report was published and looked at the papers, "the washington post" and

"the new york times," who both won pulitzer prizes for their coverage of russia collusion and neither of them remembered to mention in their banner headlines the day after the full publication of the full report, neither remembered to mention that the conclusion by mueller was that there was no collusion. instead they went for more trump bashing. i turned to cable news, some of your rivals. some i used to work at. they, too, moved very swiftly from collusion that they had been screaming about for two years to now obstruction of justice. let's analyze that for a couple of seconds. we are supposed to believe that donald trump committed repeated obstruction of justicece over a crime that he now, as we all know, did not commit? he is trying to obstruct people from investigating something he says he didn't do and the t special counsel has confirmed he didn't do. it is ridiculous, it is a farce,

it is making a mockery of america in the same way that back in my country over brexit with our departure from the european union. the people who lost the vote remained and i was one of them who refused to accept the results. do not want the country to brexit. the liberals here are refusing to accept results in 2016. hillary won the popular vote. who cares? it's not about the popular vote. now they refuse to accept the results of the mueller report. the one that they said would be absolutely the final piece. it is a disgrace! >> sean: that was so well done. i can't top that. you are edgy. "the daily mail" is edgy. this isn't edgy. this is an outright lie, conspiracy theories based on

mostly anonymous sources. what is the fallout? i don't think they ever get rid of the fake news branding of donald trump. >> i'm actually staggered with cnn, where used to work, where used to work, i have great friends there. they have gone completely in the tank anti-trump. i don't know why they have done that other than it gives them a lot of money i guess. it damages the credibility and i wish they weren't doing it. i wish that somewhere in america it would go back to representing trump in a fair way. you can actually say look, the mueller report came back and said no collusion. end, period, move on. the democrats, fueled by the media, try to continue to fight this, i'm telling you what will happen, donald trump will get reelected and he will have four more years of the this. >> sean: amazing analysis. we hope you come back more often. piers morgan, thank you. when we come back, lawrence jones back to san francisco.

he will see how that liberal city is dealing with the human feces and the needle crisis all over the place. a sneak preview of tomorrow's report. you want to see this. ♪ ♪

>> last week we told you about human feces in a crisis in san francisco and needles. we sent lawrence jones to california to check out it. the full report will air tomorrow. here's a sneak preview. >> there's feces everywhere, homeless people, needles. is that the norm around here? >> unfortunately it is. the city has become so much worse in the last ten years. >> everybody is shooting up up the street. they don't care. selling dope, crack. whatever. >> it's a bad situation. i don't know what the solution will be. >> people shoot up in the middle of the street. >> while the kids are crossing. families -- >> everything.

>> we're going to show you those pictures tomorrow. that's all the time we have left. we will never be part of the hate media. and congressman, welcome backs, filling in for laura. >> thank you. >> have a good show. >> i'm jason chaffetz in for laura ingraham. tonight, the biggest revelation in the mueller report nobody is talking about. how the obama team was asleep at the wheel while russia was on the attack. and why did president obama and secretary hillary clinton ignore the truth about the attack on christianity? victor david hanson here in moments. mexican troops pull their weapons on u.s. soldiers on our side of the border? what should our response be? that report