away, and my wife. i love you. "the ingraham angle" is up nexti ♪ ♪ >> laura: on laura ingraham this is "the ingraham angle" l from washington tonight. i want to do something a littleg different. no mueller, no barr, no contempt of barr, no impeachment talk. what are we going to talk about? i'm telling you why we are not doing it. to a lot of you, it is a lot off white noise. none of it matters, so fridays we are going to be talking about a lot of culture, political o stuff, but things that get lost in the shuffle, especially when we have as much news we have had this week. and we will answer questions such as this. what has the debate over facebook's future really mean for free speech? huge issue. and if we can't control our own borders, can't control them, why

should we be defending the borders of countries and thousands of miles away? we will be examining the backlash to all the boycotts out there, specifically chick-fil-a is the fastest growing fast food restaurant in the country. how will that teach a lesson to those who want to punish christian conservatives in the country? you know what is the third biggest fast food chain in america?a? and, why is a radical priest trying to rehab farrakhan? for all the wrong reasons. all that and more coming up.an but in a "new york times" op ed called for the breakup of a company he built with his buddy mark zuckerberg during their harvard days. his peace got him booked far and wide across in the landscape. >> this is a monopoly, the market is frozen, there is no competition and there was and no accountability.

there have been too many scandals and problems. it's at for the government to commend, break open the company. >> laura: okay, who is chris hughes? the harvard classmate of mark zuckerberg where they founded the social media giant facebook. he left the company over a decade ago with a small very lucrative stake valued at roughly $850 million.. that's about 1% of the company. after he cashed out, he has volunteered barack obama's 2008 presidential campaign, then he used his newfound wealth to buy the notorious liberal "new republic" magazine, inserting himself as editor. try to rehab that, revive that didn't work. he sold it off a couple years later. recently he has become a proponent of universal basicou income. it's only when you know all of those liberal bona fides that he has that you start to understand

the real thinking behind his call to break up the social media giant. t his main gripe is, "i'm disappointed in myself and early facebook team for not thinking more about how the news feed a algorithm could change our culture, influence elections and my favorite, empower nationalist leaders." there it is.mp if he thought facebook was amplifying the right voices meaning the left voices, then there wouldn't be the need for this correction. look, there are plenty of issues with facebook. privacy, monopoly, power et cetera, all of which we've documented on their show. but to suggest that the movement around the globe, in europe beyond, brexit, the rise of trump's economic policy, they are only popular because of facebook, that's just ludicrous. completely missing the point. and at the bottom, this is typical leftist snobbery. we don't like your ideas, so

they can't be organic. it's kind of like the way they treated the tea party back in 2010, they called it all astroturf. it didn't matter. the same thing happened with trump's election. disillusioned elites were so shocked they had to create another reason for their loss. in the end, welcome of thed breakup of facebook might even be a good idea. but the reasons they are putting forth that convincing. with the emergence of these social media companies as the main vehicle for disseminating free thought, to break them up on these grounds could actually have a chilling effect on speech that some of the former leaders don't like. joining me now, mollie hemingway, senior editor at the "federalist," and the newly relaunched human events. it's great to see you both. why does the left always want to silence the views of those who

disagree with their worldview? >> i think these guys in particular are a different kind of left. they are a liberal left, left that has unnecessarily gone through academic rigors as some of our good counterparts on the left have. they actually don't have arguments behind what they believe in and when you are arguing in a vacuum of arguments, the best ways to silence them rather than take them on. that is what happened in silicon valley at the moment. this is a very important op-ed and a very long one.in 6,000 words. i read copy all day every day that was a bit too long. but it's important because he is a leftist and he was there at the founding. it is all well and good me going on television and saying facebook band me! >> laura: he is friends with zuckerberg, goes to his houseod they are friends. >> we should take them very very seriously i think. >> laura: and the other cofounder of facebook to tween it out, if the goal is to

improve democracy, we should bring up fox first. he deleted that real quick. >> i can imagine. but it gets at this underlying issue which is that online, the primary means by which we discuss politics and have political engagement, there are these efforts to shut down conservative speech, and they are serious issues they need to be dealt with. o it doesn't mean using government power is the way to do about even the way they are talking about is at the opposite were true. online space is so friendly it's completely at odds with what we have seen from a lot of these tech giants that limit what people can say, and that is a big problem that we are going to see some people pushing for regulation and i think we need to smart about it. >> laura: it is a very tricky thing because there is an impulse in me that these things are so big and a billion people on the platform, snapchat whatsapp, facebook combined

that is a huge, huge imprint. on the other hand, for the government to step in and say we are going to cut this, it's not clear that that is going to bring about more free speech. i don't understand how that will necessarily bring about more free speech, because, i want to play something. not from a conservative, this is cnbc, a professor spoke out yesterday when this whole controversy emerged from this op-ed. let's watch. >> breaking up facebook by itself isn't really going to solve some of the core issues that facebook has faced criticism for.y the fact that social media platforms have led to political polarization, the fact that users have very limited, if nott any privacy rights. none of these things are going to be addressed by the breaking up of facebook. it is sort of rooted in 20th century economics.

>> laura: break up -- his point, it's led to the polarization. no, polarization, you've written about this, has been created because globalization ran over the middle class in europeou france, britain, italy, even sweet and with the mass migration. globalization, open borders has heard a lot of people. not facebook. >> i don't know entirely though. there are problems. i'm not a fan of laws about monopolies but we do have these laws and there are a lot of privileges accorded to some of these tech giants on the premise that they are open platforms where anyone can speak but they are not behaving that way. that is something that can be looked into. should they receive these privileges of government help when they are, in some cases, a monopolistic type enterprise. i don't have a huge problem with that but there are laws governing these things and they should behave in such a way as to not take advantage. >> laura: conservatives always

say, oh, that is a liberal thing. i'm not sure.. margaret thatcher loved small business.t she was very distrustful of these large, multinational corporations. this is among the biggest of the big. they can squash you. d getting banned from various platforms and he is like, what did i do? >> i actually disagree with a lot of the conservative voices out there that are pushing back against the idea of regulation somehow appear to number onehi regulation doesn't have to be inaccurate thing, they are keeping some of these companies up, get rid of that and then you will see more competition. i actually agree with chris hughes, if you do break up facebook, it allows for competitors to move into the space a little bit easier. only a little bit easier, but still a little bit easier. the other thing we have to recognize when it comes to the platform access issue is that we are now talking about this in civil-rights terms because the public square is actually no different and anyone who thinks that it's going to go apart rather than more together.

>> laura: by the way, i added to their empire incorrectly facebook does not own snapchat. they own instagram. a panel, thank you. we will see some movement on this and it will be coming at the campaign. elizabeth warren, blumenthal speaking about this issue. also tonight, the liberals are coming! the liberals are coming! for your chickens.s. >> two colleges are voting to boot chick-fil-a from their campuses. students voting to remove the fast food chain over theirir alleged anti-lgbtq views. >> laura: this comes after successful efforts to ban the rest are from airports san antonio and buffalo. but these actions have produced what i like to call, a boycott backlash. chick-fil-a is now the third biggest u.s. restaurant chain after sales have tripled in the last decade.e.

joining me now, that fox news contributor, fox news radio, and democratic strategist. all right, critics will have you believe that because chick-fil-a's board has given money to things like the christian fellowship, youth fellowship, or to ymca that this is an organization that is routinely discriminating against gays and lesbians. >> both of those claims are false. totally baseless. i am mystified by this obsession with chick-fil-a. >> laura: for years! i'm hungry by having this conversation. >> we keep hearing about them and we are like, are we still doing this? meanwhile, chick flick keeps going. this is why. i know this is shocking, they make really delicious fried chicken products. t and they have a reliably friendly service and clean restaurants. imagine that combination. and they are only open six days a week and still crushing it.

the product is what matters, and all this other noise, i guess it makes headlines and there are these activists on campus and depriving deliciousness of other students. that is that they are lost. people are going to find their way to the products they want and are clearly making their way to chick-fil-a. >> laura: it's been seven years since the founder of chick-fil-a, the lgbt lobby has not lost the matter. we are still told that eating a chicken nugget is an act of bigotry against homosexuals because of views expressed by the ceo during obama's office. the problem is if you believe in people who believe in biblical marriage basically don't deserve to be in the public square selling or even speaking because you are hearing that pushback as well, that is a lotr of people who are just removed from the american understanding. >> as a full disclaimer, i survived on chick-fil-a allme throughout college. my sophomore year, i loved it

the same respect given to people's views and corporation's views on issues should be given to protesters who want to take their dollars elsewhere. i will point out that not only did they have a welcoming environment, but the key thing we should focus on is the 0% rating from the human rights campaign on their employee rights practices. they don't support spousal benefits for same-sex couples or adoption rights. so there is an argument to make it there. >> i have no problem. if i am gay, i eat a chicken nugget, if someone feels so strongly, that's fine, you don't have to go eat there but don't try to agitate to get these things banned from schools and airports. a lot of us want to eat that stuff. don't try to impose that on the rest of us. >> laura: it's amazing, the boards of trustees, most of them, they wilt at the sign they

get ten letters and they go, oh we decried the bigotry of chick-fil-a! what bigotry are they talking about? >> they need to step up. >> laura: many hungry alums have to step forward. >> mayor pete had an interesting line, i disagree with the politics of chick-fil-a but it's pretty okay chicken. he wants to be a bridge, and wei should find a bridge to chick-fil-a and those activists and see if we can bridge that gap. >> laura: this is a restaurant chain.ts they are not denying access to people based on their political beliefs, but everyone has the right to their own beliefs about whether it is affirmative action or or marriage. millions and millions and millions and millions of america agree with them, so are all of them horrible, awful, rotten people? the left is going way too far and there is a big backlash. r these boycotts at the

chick-fil-a are just helping chick-fil-a. >> i also think it is exhausting to a lot of people. everyone, just chill the hell out and eat some tasty chicken. i am also a fan of ben & jerry's ice cream. some flavors are delicious, i indulge from time to time, but i cannot stand the politics of those guys at all. >> laura: may neither. >> but i'm not sitting here to say it -- i choosing to buy their products, let's shut down locations on campus. >> laura: i'm going to show you, this is a list of groups chick-fil-a has donated to. these are the ones that are so objectionable. all right, look. fellowship of christian athletes, salvation army, what's this? what's the problem here? >> there are some issues with the salvation army of transgender folks.sa i think we have come a lot from their support of conversion therapy that we saw in 2011

2012. >> laura: obama was for traditional marriage and most of the democrat party. >> but we are talking about conversion therapy, which is really bad for lgbt youth in this country, which we can agree on. >> laura: i think, again instead of more speech and more debate, they want to demonize people with whom they disagree. debate it! have a conversation. >> more speech, more debate chicken. >> laura: i am very hungry. already, thanks so much.au this week, we documented a much trouble we are having keeping our borders secure.e he saw the pieces come east of the interviews we did. so why are some demanding that we continue to overextend ourselves overseas, defending i the borders of other countries? and why are you being blamed for all that? we'll explain, next. and why are you being blamed

you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase sensimist relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist.

>> laura: president trump has stood against the interventionist strain blown through the republican party he now leads. the endless war in afghanistan provides a perfect example of how this all plays out.t the president has long advocated for a media drawdown, even folks once affiliated with the

administration, including h.r. mcmaster, former national security advisor, are saying this. >> there is defeatist narrative now that doesn't reflect what is at stake or the situation. a young student stood up and said all my my life have known my whole life is war. he has never been never been to work, but he has been suggested to a narrative of war weariness. >> laura: i cannot believe he worked for the administration. do you get that? america war weariness is not rooted in fact. this is lunacy. the benefit of fighting wars thousands of miles away has to be apparent to people especially after a decade. a retired u.s. army colonel doug mcgregor. our the americans the ones to blame? i have heard a lot of naughtiness but that is about it. >> he expresses a and opinion widely held in the pentagon that

the war is an end in itself. there was no connection to policy analysis or coherent strategy. the idea is you've got to keep the war going and when you ask questions, you're obviously ignorant. the president is a fool, why does he continue to ask why areo we there? we spent $6 trillion, lost thousands of lives, we have more enemies than we had 19 years ago, what are we doing? >> laura: we can't even get the actual figure for how much we've spent.ye it's hard to get that down somewhere between $2 trillion and $6 trillion. in iraq, 822 billion, got to be more than that. i saw that and i thought, there is no way that can be right. a billion in afghanistan 975 billion, it's got to be more than that, pakistan, 10 billion. that is just a drop in the bucket yet, we were down at the border this week. it is a shock. we don't have the manpower, we don't have the judges, or the

laws. these people are outmanned and overwhelmed by the u.s. border and you go over there and these other countries -- >> in the meantime, 94% of the heroin that comes into thehe united states comes in from mexico. the six cartels from mexico are shipping the opioids into the country that killed at least 70,000 americans and we are hearing general mckenzie talk about allegedly the iranians that killed 600 americans over the last several years and this is the justification for going to war with iran. why are we militarizing our border and protecting the country? >> laura: just today, the pentagon announced it is shifting $1.5 billion originally for the afghan forces at the border to help pay for the fence or wall or whatever we are calling it beauty trump winning the fight? >> no, absolutely not, they are picking the areas where there are no patrolmen and dump off

new migrants. t we've got to understand new mexico is not a normal state. it is controlled by the cartels. it is time to militarize that border, and president trump needs to do it. if he wants his base to come out for him, that is what he's got to do. >> laura: what we saw, great men in the border patrol, it is so unfair what has been done and we've got to change the asylum laws, it is great to see you tonight. coming up, a little different. friday folly with raymond arroyo and it is fantastic. stay there. friday folly with raymond arroyo and it is fantastic. stay there.

the talks coming to an end afte tears -- tariffs of $200 million were raised from 10-25%. the us trade representative is preparing terrace on another $300 billion in chinese goods, not already facing taxes. china has already promised what it termed necessary countermeasures. in the meantime, a 19 billion and disaster aid built to puert rico, which is still struggling and fighting to recover. the boat was among party lines. republican say it should includ 4.5 billion for aid enforcement. legislation is still bottled up in the senate. now back to the in graham angle. >> laura: friday night, that means it is time for friday

folly. a radical priest tries to rehab farrakhan? a panel of democrats to fight over 2020, and one dad you want to avoid. joining us now with the details raymond arroyo, fox news contributor, author, i thought after farrakhan was banned from facebook that, i don't know, his days in the spotlight might be coming to an end but now a catholic priest is trying to resurrect him. >> laura, it is simply unbelievable.ca a leftist activist, which we will get to in a moment, he invited the controversial nation of islam leader to speak at his chicago parish yesterday. the reason, he wants farrakhan back on facebook. watch. >> minister farrakhan has been a bold voice against injustice done against black people in this country. his voice deserves and needs to be heard! >> to underscore the point, he broadcast louis farrakhan's visit to the parish flouting it

even though he was banned from the social media site in part because of his allegedly anti-semitic speech. >> to the white people who think i'm a hater, you don't know me! somebody made you hate me! this is just the beginning! banning me from a social platform! i used that platform with respect. and i'm here to separate the good jews from the satanic jews. >> he is out of his mind. to think that this is appropriate or in any where social justice, to bring a man like this flouting anti-semitism to a catholic church, it is amazing to me that chicago hasn't intervened here. >> laura: he has been doing

this type of nonsense for years yet the vatican looks the other way, there is no comment. he has been a nightmare frankly, for a lot of catholics in the chicago area and franklyt across the country for a long long time. we should've brought them on the facebook panel a few minutes ago. >> here's the thing, at one point, america he said is the greatest sin against god and he called for a gun owner who owned a shop, he asked people to snuff out the owner of a gun shop. now the president of the illinois holocaust museum herself a survivor of the holocaust said, "i don't understand because i've always thought he was one for peace. what he is doing today and what he is doing with farrakhan is giving him a platform fors hatred, hatred he has spoken for many, many years." this is hopefully not the last we hear of people speaking out

against this kind of hatred. >> laura: tell us about the cnn panel.f >> speaking of unexpected reactions, cnn gathered a panel of democrats in pennsylvania to try to get a pulse on how democrats are feeling going into 2020. then came the ultimate question. >> how many of you feel confident today that a democrat will win in 2020? [ringing] >> later, a fight broke out over the gender of the democratic nominee or what it should be. >> i still don't know if the country is ready for a woman. i think they are. >> if they are not ready, we t have to make it ready. it is time for a woman to run this country. why not? >> i want a woman president more than anything else in this world.

when i was a little girl, i wanted to be the first woman president. >> laura: that's nice.e. when i am trying to get over is allison saying this, after only two or three people raised their hands, hm. what producer is going to get the boost because of this embarrassing panel? >> you saw something very illustrative there. you are seeing a glimpse of the 2028 democratic party appeared at the moment, they lack unity there is no clear governing agenda or something to rally them together except hatred of trump. that is it. what you are seeing and i think you are going to see more of is a collapse into gender and identity politics that could rip them apart. really, that could be a multi-headed hydra going into 2020 and paving the way for donald trump. laura, we've been having someha very bad weather down here in louisiana where i am right now

and at the other day, a local reporter decided to use a prop to show how high the water was. he decided to use a crawfish. bad choice. >> a number of people are actually here looking for crawfish. they actually just got me on tv. wow, that hurt. >> [laughs] the only kind of crawfish is that has been boiled and you snap its head off. that is the only kind. >> laura: i thought it was going to be the other day when they rang the doorbell, i thought this was a crawfish biting him on the nose. the finger? we want the whole nose taken off, okay? not really, it's just funny or taken off, okay.f, >> i know. this saturday, a book signing at 3:00 p.m., so everybody come out and see me. raymond arroyo, on my website details there. we will see you next week.

we want a toxic masculinity culture created by the left condemned boys for being men but is the impulse to step up and save others from danger really something we should be clamping down? u a doctor joins me with analysis next.

>> encouraging men to

>> encouraging men to take a stand against so-called toxic masculinity. >> they don't want to be held accountable. accountability. toxic masculinity is not actual masculinity.ty >> toxic masculinity is tied so closely to masculinity. >> laura: you hear that a lot men should be manly without being toxic, whatever that means. boys should soften their edges before they step over the line because of all that testosterone. it is important to highlight ths moments when man's natural strength and chivalry and courage saves lives. take the heroes from two recent shootings. when a gunman opened fired at a unc charlotte campus for twope days ago, 21-year-old riley howell charged at him, was shot point blank, but still knocked the shooter off his feet. then there is 18-year-old kendrick castillo, he left from his deck tuesday at a colorado stem school when a shooter entered the classroom. while he confronted the suspect with little regard for his own life, others rushed to safety.y.

kendrick, tragically, was killed. but because of his bravery well, summing his father remembered about him. >> it's no surprise that if danger wasn't facing him, he would approach it. >> laura: oh, my god, i bawled when i saw that today. what possesses men to ask this way? for answers, i want to bring in dr. drew pinsky. we've talked about these issues before, but these two cases, i have a goose bumps hearing the dad, his loss, his sadness. but the heroism and the sacrifice from young men, 16 17, 18 years of age, not here to speak their own story, their own truth. incredible. >> there is a tendency for the males to turn their aggression which is what people worry about with toxic masculinity -- turn aggression into a positive impulse. whether they are landing at the beach in omaha or rushing a

shooter, there is a naturall tendency that they actually learn through rough-and-tumble play that is automatic and yount males, where they learn to sort of modulate their aggression but they also learn how to turn it up so they know when it's time to bring it on. >> laura: so much in society today discourages men from believing there is a natural impulse to be chivalrous or show this type of physical courage. your stereotyping, there is a push and pull to that. >> i actually agree with you, it is exclusive. on "game of thrones," it's not like the other males are exclusively heroic. women can be heroic, too, but because of the aggression and the things that makes us "toxic" it makes us do the things that

push society forward and helpca people in extreme situations. ultimately, it's aggression and we are turning our aggression into helpfulness and it's okay. >> laura: another issue with a suspect in the colorado school shooting which is being overlooked in some quarters. it was a transgender male in the process of transitioning, from a female biologically male. taking hormones and so forth what would that series of drugs do, or how could it affect the mental state of an individual? given how little we have as far as information on the way these drugs affect behavior s especially the testosterone. >> that is correct. we have very limited research on

the topic and i know of no evidence that it turns people actually violent. but when you expose people to male levels of violence, and i've talked to many transgender folks over the years and i am interested in talking to thers female to male patients because they say the same thing, i had no idea you were dealing with this. and i point out to them, not only have we been dealing with this chemically in our system god saw fit to give this to us at 13. >> laura: i want to read this this is from dr. paul, and they said this therapy may have real long-term effects on children's physical and psychologicalsa development, whether blocking puberty is the best way to treat gender dysphoria it remains far from settled and it should be considered a drastic and experimental measure. johns hopkins, the premier researchers are on this.s.

others who use these drugs say the same thing. hey, we don't have peer-reviewed studies yet parents are giving kids of these drugs before the age of 18, before they can give real consent even. >> we don't have the research. you have said it and it is clea and it is true. for me to say something conclusive about aggression and violence, i can't do it. but testosterone is the drug of aggression. let me tell you one quick thing that bothers me, we've gotten to a position in this country where we privilege psychiatric symptoms over the well-being of the individual and the community. if this kid was having a lot of symptomatology, no one was allowed to do anything if the kid didn't want anything done unless the parents demanded a paired with the 18 year olds you can't do anything. there is privilege in the law for psychiatric symptoms, that is why we have homeless and violent acting out episodes. >> laura: dr. drew pinsky great to see you on a friday night. dr. drew, you take care. coming up, protesters turned the

tables on the shameful democratic lawmaker who harassed pro-life teenagers. tonight, their mom is here and boy, is she angry. how she and the rest of the pro-life community are hitting back next. boy, is she angry. how she and the rest of the pro-life community are hitting back next. >> donate any of these three who were going to donate to planned parenthood.

>> what we've got here is a bunch of protesters, a bunch of pseudo-christian protesters who have been a shaming young for being here. about $100 to anyone who will identify any of these three. today's protester is an old white lady who is going to try to avoid showing you her face. shame on you. what you are doing here is disgusting. >> laura: new developments regarding that disgraceful pennsylvania state rep. you might remember this, he was caught harassing pro-life teams in philadelphia earlier thisia week, also the elderly woman. today in response, i love this hundreds of pro-lifers give back in a show of prayerful force outside of that clinic. guess who was too scared to show up? that's right, joining me now is

ashley garris, who was harassed alongside her daughters. ashley, first of all, you are a hero to me. i love the fact that you stared him down when this thing blew up in front of the clinic and for our viewers, who did not see what he said afterward, i want to play it. >> i have seen first hand the insults and the racism in the attacks of those protesters mostly young girls going there for clinical care.rd two wrongs don't make a right, i can do better and i will do better. >> laura: that was his version of the apology. il was that okay? >> no. at no point did he make an actual apology. i believe in that video he is really only referencing his interaction with the other woman. he never made any reference to his encounter with my daughters and their friend.

he certainly doesn't address the fact that he approached them aggressively, verbally harassing them, threatening, and takes no accountability for his actions. he literally never says "i'm sorry." so that is not an apology. >> laura: imagine if the shoe were on the other foot here.ra imagine if this was some conservative legislator shaming or trying to shame girls at a pro-choice rally and try to intimidate them and verbally harassed them, as he was doing. and then that kind of apology. the left will be laughing -- and they will be demanding his resignation. are you demanding he step aside? >> i think he has made it clear that he is an elected official who does not understand the m fundamental rights than american citizens hold under the first amendment. the rate for free expression of

religion and freedom of speech as elected officials. it's their responsibility to protect those rights. he chose instead to infringe and attack our rights. i think that leaves him unworthy to hold the office in which he sits.nw >> laura: the left claims to be so tolerant. they are so tolerant except when someone disagrees with them, and is persuasive. today, i have to ask you, how did it feel to be out there with so many great members of the pro-life community supporting the mission, supporting the cause of innocent life being protected. it was a show of positive force. i saw the video, i love every minute of it. >> it was incredible. i thought i was overwhelmed just when the fund-raiser that mymy husband and i launched in response to this reached $100,000 in two days.

i thought that was overwhelming but when i reached there today and i saw, my guess is 1,000 people, i was overcome. i had to take a minute to compose myself because it was just incredible.me the love and the power, it was unbelievable. >> laura: good things come from an uncomfortable, awful experience, and your daughters u also learned a lot. they all talk about girl power. your daughter showed us what girl power is. standing up to the intolerant bullies on the left and i salute you as a mother and as a pro-life person. s i am so proud of you. good for you, and it looks like a lot more than a few hundreda people, thank you very much. coming up, the left's desire to racialize everything. stay right there. esire to racialized everything. racialized everything. stay right there. you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills?

flonase sensimist relieves all your worst symptoms, .. flonase sensimist.

it is time for the last bite. here is a play in 3 x. trump extends white house invite toward the boston red sox. act 2, some members of the team reject the invite. act 3, leftists claim rep trump is a racist and are not coming. msnbc contributor ron claim. >> he was happy he was able to say the white players were here at layers of color weren't. that is the division he fosters deliberately. >> he was white house aide to barack obama and bill clinton. that is all-time we have tonight, an amazing week at the border, great work from the team in washington and check out my

latest podcast. shannon bream and the fox news at 19, america now and forever, we will always be here fighting for you. >> this is a fox news alert, the president's personal attorney is headed to ukraine to weigh in on investigations involving hillary clinton and joe biden, democrats in the media say sounds like collusion with a foreign power. rudy giuliani is here to explain what he is up to in a fox news at night exclusive, the president gets tough on china, new tariffs kicked in and