i went back home and then everyone in the house agreed it was time for a haircut. you're here at the best barbershop in el paso. >> sean: we will never be the destroy media mob. let not your heart be troubled. we just saw you on tucker's sho show. now you are becoming -- three hours of radio and tv. >> laura: they asked me to show up. my question to you is, why are you picking on poor robert francis? he should be in one of those saddles like a little boy haircut where you get on a saddle and you get the cap gun. my brothers would do that. you are being mean to him. >> sean: it was not a good experience to take him to get that haircut. >> laura: i think he is trying

to be like aoc. she is doing that calista graham, i am cooking. anyone have a good recipe for this? it's ridiculous. you are awesome. the reporting on what is about to blow and this russia investigation of the investigators. we've only scratched a little bit of the surface when it comes to jim comey, i can't wait. >> sean: it's all coming and good that we fix it for the country but sad at all happened. >> laura: i'm laura ingraham and this is "the ingraham angle" from washington. read giuliani, sol wisenberg will be here to explain how and why white house lawyers repelled the jerry nadler and the rest of the probe addicted democrats, plus what might be the most consequential fight playing out across america.

alabama new pro-life bill. it was just signed into law. candace owens will react to this and claim that this legislation adversely affects the minority community. michelle malkin is here with their first response to being censored by facebook. she was arguing against censorship. you can't make that up. kamala harris points to bill nye as her climate guru. beto does reboot hits another pothole a day tribute to tim conway. >> the white house counsel says it will not entertain any of the democrats requests for more documents or interviews regarding the russian investigation. they sent a letter to the house committee chair jerry nadler saying "congressional investigations are intended to obtain information to aid potential legislation not to harass political opponents or to

pursue an unauthorized do over of exhausted investigations conducted by the department of justice. he naturally bristled at the response. >> the white house the department of justice is enabling the white house to try to abate all accountability to the american people. they are saying the president is above the law. he is a tyrant and a dictator with no limit on his power. >> laura: joining me now as his personal attorney and sol wisenberg at fox news contributor. the they are also saying the mur report makes the request move. what is your reaction? does congress have any right to this information? >> let me say something about his response that the president is a tyrant and above the law.

this is a legal mentor random. it is very well thought out and very well written and obviously he makes the point of executive privilege but it goes way beyond executive privilege. it makes a very important point, i would've added nancy pelosi statement last week that the legislature is the superior brand because that is the way they are acting. they've issued not just one hearing but dislikes hearings so it has to be seen in the context of hearings. they have already issued hundreds of subpoenas looking for possibly a million documents or more. we have jerry nadler, adam schefter, they are all like daytime television and the reality is this is a tremendous burden on the executive may law has a way to deal with it. there are cases that say that legislative power is there, but i can't be used for any permissive purpose.

and there are subpoenas and information requests and they don't cite a single piece of legislation they are pursuing. not only that, they are taking over an executive branch function. they are afraid to call this impeachment hearing. this is oversight. you don't issue hundreds of subpoenas. >> laura: are you saying that if this were actually in impeachment proceedings then you wouldn't have a problem with these? >> they have to generate their own information. they can't be just redoing that and if they were in good faith they would read through the mueller report and they would say we now have all this information. we have ten more questions or 15 more questions. >> laura: they are doing a dramatic reading of the whole thing. >> several federal cases make it clear that if you're going to impose on the executive that has to be tailored and it has to be

narrow. it can't be overly intrusive. this is all of those things. it is boredom some. it has multiplied by six. >> laura: this is even talk about the case and the d.c. district court involving the president and his financial records which they are also arguing. >> you have to argue these as one because as they affect the executive branch, they are not the six separate hearings. you have to respond to this avalanche of subpoenas with means if you close down shop. >> laura: a former official says that the white house has the assertion that congress does not have a right to the information. this is joshua galt's are aren't interests, they are core responsibilities at the heart or branch checking our branch and even just understanding it. how do you react?

>> i think both sides have a problem, i think the subpoenas have been grossly overbroad from the house of representatives and i think the letter from the white house counsel is very overbroad. there is no such thing as saying constitutionally, you don't get to do a do over and congressional authority to investigate is very broad. these battles have gone back through the beginning of the republic. go back to 1796, congress wanted president washington's papers and he said you're not going to get them. ms. madison said, he was a congressman, we have a right to do anything we ask for it but the president has a right to say i don't want to give it to you and this is part of the checks and balances. >> laura: we will have the executive on to something the left is saying. there is a piece saying, they are trying to say they have a divine right to the information.

they are always jockeying for power. you remember this. it is always a fight between the legislative branch of the executive. i've never seen it like i see it now. at every turn they've hounded him at every turn and accused him of being a traitor. setting up meetings at trump tower. he is like a combo of stalin and chairman mao or something. this is the level. i want to play something that jerry nadler said tonight. let's watch. >> we are looking at all options to deal with a lawless administration and everything is being looked at. >> everything is being looked at including possible jail? >> we are looking at the law but we will look at all options to

force the administration to be able to hold the administration accountable, whatever it may take. >> laura: that was at cnn. what is he talking about? what are the remedies? does he want to arrest somebody? >> let me respond with a articulate comment. i think he is saying he would look at jail which is of course absurd, there is nothing lawless. he could be quite right that it's a broad response you know as a lawyer who raised all your arguments and there are some better overbroad and some that are very strong. the strongest one being that the court held that the power of the congress is very broad, but not unlimited. i think given the number of subpoenas and hearings, the predetermined position of the

three chairman who have already said he should be impeached and jerry nadler was overheard blaming it on amtrak. i think they have a very good argument to the court, how do things get this far and let's check this, as long as they are willing to compromise. if there's going to be a narrow, more focused subpoena. >> laura: he left to the door open. he knows that. it does not like he is shutting the door completely. >> it's not lawless, we will go before a court. >> laura: they don't want impeachment. >> that is why he is full of you know what. >> laura: discussed what we were talking about last week. there is a brewing fight between brennan and comey when it comes to the use of this phony dossie dossier. >> a dispute over whether former ca director john brennan or

former fbi director james comey push the dossier during the transition has broken out into the open. the records are not public but sources from only with the content say the emails indicate comey told subordinates that he insisted the dossier should be included in the former intelligence assessment on russian election interference. >> laura: i'm hearing that one of those communications also says that jim comey and december of 2016 said the dossier is unreliable. he didn't want the intel to review it. i heard today from a white house force saying, the president may be looking to release and declassify all of the relevant documents leading out to the probe next week. >> i heard he will give them to bill barr. i've been hearing that for a long time. >> laura: apparently it's next week, that's what my source

tells me. that will give us a lot of answers. he wants that your debating. we will have facts on the table. >> he admits in his own book that he didn't reveal the whole dossier to the president, only the salacious parts. he didn't tell him this was an investigation and that's in his own book. i don't want to speculate among those two which one is right. >> laura: apparently there was some talk about how this would look, this could look like among intel sources, it could look like the fbi was doing some kind of weird preemptive blackmail with the president with comey going to that meeting. it didn't look good. they were worried with comey presenting the dossier would look like he was having some j. edgar hoover tactics. that is really disturbing. >> it doesn't look like it, it was.

the reality is that comey, the noose is tightening around his neck really bad. he in january told the president of salacious and unverified. how did it become that over five months? comey says that it's verified in footnote five page 15, he says it is reliable, not unverified. he either lied to the president or he lied to the court. i'm betting on he lied to the court and we call that perjury. >> laura: thank you. >> i will believe it when i see it. >> i agree, it's hard to indict that. >> laura: it will get very interesting next week. >> this guy will tell you what will happen to your mortal soul which is what he said to rod rosenstein. maybe he is above indictment. >> laura: the question now is

how will this between the white house and congress impact the the legislative priority? is he going to be able to get anything done? >> they are not talking about the substance at this point, they are just questioning each other's motives something you know you get to a new level in politics where you are so distrustful of the other guy. >> the democrats would argue, it's our job. if we did not do this how will future congresses behave, potentially when there is a democrat in the white house and there is potential wrongdoing there? we have to do our job. >> do you agree with the word he used? >> i agree, my view is that many times before. if he can use various mechanisms without congressional approval then why have a congress? you have a king. >> laura: the chairman of the american conservative union and

richard good student, a former hillary clinton advisor. how does a do-nothing congress help america? >> the fact is it has passed gun control legislation and it will shore up the affordable care act into a couple of things, 89% approval and whether they pass it or not that is out of the control of the house. the question i would raise is does the president want his priorities awol that mexico was supposed to pay for? does he want those things done or does he want the issue to run on? i think he would -- he said that his health care thing will come after the election and i don't think he wants to get anything done, he wants to run as he did in 2016. trust me, this time i will do it. >> laura: i think politics is the art of the possible. you can pass a lot of things but you have to work from the other

side and craft something. it's a complicated deal and it's not easy. in the first hundred days they had kind of a lot to show for it the trump administration. they were on their way to the tax cut. all the regulations of the judges. they made some mistakes of the gate but they did a loft. the democrats are running against trump now and that is it. >> with the president has had to face, the whole idea of hashtag resistance. no honeymoon, the president has been able to get things done recently like the criminal justice reform which are maybe atypical issues for a republica republican. i think what you are seeing is the president is navigating democratic party that does more radicalized than we've ever seen. if it wasn't trump they would be doing this against any republican who would have gotten this. that is their state of mind.

>> trump and nancy pelosi on the same page, who is not? mick mulvaney. >> you don't know what you're talking about. >> he hasn't give them an answer with how they will pay for it. >> that's not true, it's in the budget you should read it. >> laura: i think it's an interesting question. it's always hard when you are running against an incumbent president. people have a greater sense of optimism and i think in most polls, but inside russia and all this, most people feel pretty good about the future. there are challenges of health care costs, but most people are pretty optimistic. most people have more money in their pocket. it's hard to run against that. >> the right track numbers are better under trump and obama's offer his eight years. the american people feel better because they are practical people and they see their

economic prospects are improving and that is why it's not selfish for the american people to vote. >> why is the average at 40% for donald trump. >> the real clear politics average. he wasn't an office in the economy wasn't doing what it is now. >> laura: it's 44% tonight. i just got that. >> they just ate a whole piece on it. the president is higher where he was then election night. >> laura: this is a hard thing for the democrats, when you start out with 80 subpoenas against former officials and that doesn't exactly engender a sense of, we will work with you.

yet the president and good faith met with them on infrastructure and wants to do something on immigration and that is amazing considering you want to get his son on the council. >> they passed a bill and 2013, 68 votes in the senate including lindsey graham. if that was put on the floor it would pass the house and it should pass the senate. if the people who voted for less time would vote for again than it would have the votes. >> he is approaching it from what we have to do right now which is secure the border and take care of these loopholes. >> i'm hearing a lot of republicans having problems with it. >> laura: always great to see you both. alabama just passed a law that effectively bans abortions and they're not the only state. candace owens is here to respond that these pro-life laws can hurt minorities. a full debate is next.

♪ >> mom: hi. >> tech: so bring it to safelite. we can repair it the same day... guaranteed. plus with most insurance, it's no cost to you. >> mom: really? >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, ♪ safelite replace. moving? that's harder now because of psoriatic arthritis. but you're still moved by moments like this. don't let psoriatic arthritis take them away. taltz reduces joint pain and stiffness and helps stop the progression of joint damage. for people with moderate to severe psoriasis, 90% saw significant improvement. taltz even gives you a chance at completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms, or received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. for all the things that move you. ask your doctor about taltz.

webut some of us turn outhose dreams...... into action... the bookers. the doers. the 'hit that confirmation button and let's go!'- ers! because bookers know that the perfect place to stay... is right there for the booking. be a booker at booking.com the world's #1 choice for booking accommodations.

♪ >> laura: the alabama governor signed the nation's strictest abortion ban making it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion. this comes on the heels of a georgia and ohio law that are

both pro-life, very pro-life but the party are crying foul. >> you just aborted the state of alabama. you just ripped alabama with this bill. >> laura: democrats earned total meltdown, roe v. wade is on the chopping block. >> it is wrong and we will fight back. >> laments health care is under attack and we will not stand for it. >> it's nothing short of an attack on woman. under the conservative agenda, it's to take away reproductive health and freedom. >> laura: joining me now is candace owens, conservative commentator the former campaign manager for buttigieg. a new pullout this week reveals the majority of americans don't think heartbeat bills

are too restrictive. you are saying they are wrong? >> they are too restrictive because at the point of six weeks of pregnancy a lot of woman don't know what they are pregnant so it's entirely too restrictive. if we are talking about alabama they are going farther than that. >> laura: this issue has blown out. it's almost blown the mueller subpoena fight off the front pages because democrats think if they can get the republicans back in the culture wars, they are golden in 2020. is that accurate? >> no. the fact that this bill passed is telling us that conservatives are winning across the country and people are starting to wake up. they pretend that they are for progress when in fact everything they do leads to results particularly in the minority community and we note that abortions impact the black community more than anybody els else. they are 7% of the population

yet account for 47% of all the abortions in america. >> laura: i want to get to that. melissa milano spoke out last night on cnn about that very issue. let's watch. >> does well affect the communities of color more than anything. for the women of color for the women that are marginalized for the women that are low income communities and the women who are most at direct. this will be catastrophic. >> laura: i don't understand the argument. it seems to be and it's been made all of our social media, the bill itself is racist because there is a disproportionate number of black women in the state of alabama who would be having abortions. a pro-life bill would mean they were born a black baby so how is it racist when the result is more black children, more opportunity and for people to adopt a more opportunity for people to have their own

reproductive rights? what about the people who lose their rights by not being born? >> if they have a prejudicial or racial effect they are also racist. >> laura: so no intent required? >> if it has a racist effect and is considered racist but what she was saying and advancing she has a prudential law professor but what she is pointing out is that there is a dearth of health care options for women of color especially in alabama. we have seen republicans continuously try to take those options away. >> laura: how is it health care? >> reproductive health is health care. having economy over your own body is health care. this alabama law criminalizes that. the doctor can now get more time for performing an abortion in the racist would would get.

now the doctor will get more time. >> laura: this will all shake out one way or the other. >> i want be clear. you are saying that black baby tom mack babies being born as racist. they have a right to be alive. that's what you just said. you said it would ban. racist results is not that being born. we know the black population would be doubled if not for abortions and we of the founder of planned parenthood who was quoted in a letter saying that she wanted to exterminate the black population. we know that she has been pine large successful. it's time to pull that back and educate black americans about the fact that liberals advocate for things that harm our community first and foremost. the black population growth has stagnated completely so that tells you that is your result.

black woman -- >> you have a baby in your stomach and it has its own fingertips and phone dna and that is two lives. that is what a pregnant woman is killed they call it a double homicide. >> black babies being born is not racist and i want to be clear on that. >> laura: here is the science argument. the left is about climate chang change. republicans don't care about facts, they care about emotions, but this is a factual thing. it's inconvenient for a lot of people but it's also effectual that human beings are human beings. down to the very time. >> conservatives have spent the last two or three decades pretty much butchering history, science and economics, it's only natural that medicine is the next frontier.

>> you are the party of the kkk and crow laws and now you are also the party that is advocating for black babies to be aborted. >> i believe you are climate change denier. >> laura: here's the climate of the commercials. we loved having you both on. this is a big issue. it will be really hot in the election on this issue and coming up, seen and unseen ♪ almost lost my life. my doctors again ordered me to take aspirin, and i do. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. listen to the doctor. take it seriously.

in bed?ll your oral laxative work? try fleet liquid glycerin instead. relief in minutes, not hours. every time on your time. now $1 off with sunday's paper. guaranteed relief or your money back.

you don't need to go anywhere dad, this is your home. the best home to be in is your own. home instead offers personalized in-home services for your loved ones. home instead senior care. to us, it's personal. >> laura: it's time for seen and unseen. a comedy legend, bill my and beto 2.0. the depth of tim conway wasn't just a loss for comedy, for you personally. >> i interviewed him a number of times and we kept in touch over the years.

he was a gentle, kind, hilariously funny man. he appeared in everything to spongebob squarepants where he voiced barnacle boy but it was has worked for more than a decade on the carol burnett show that made him part of our lives. >> what was that about that group of people in that time that made the carol burnett show while we work -- >> we were all alcoholics. that gave us a certain relaxation to the show. we were the best of friends and carol is the most generous person you can imagine. she was always willing to share the show and i think that is what they did so good. >> i was at this freak show one time and i saw siamese elephant elephants. [laughter] i felt sorry for them.

>> we didn't play the best part. they killed the left. when i asked him off camera why this comedy was so infectious he told me this group of people loved each other in a labor to surprise each other. watch he and his friends, classic. >> novocain, here we go. take hold of the hypodermic needle. [laughter] they will be pain and then numbness will set in. [laughter] i will just give you a shot her here. [laughter] he will be right with you.

>> witnessed a guy in the army, he said they come artery, that is what made the laughs. >> laura: you cannot fake chemistry and everybody knows it. we've been friends a long time. >> we are free to ridicule. while we talk about that, democratic hopeful kamala harris tweeted this out as i guess a character witness for her climate change position. it is the science guy. >> what i'm saying is the planet as on a [bleep] fire. there are things we can do to put it out. are any of them freed? nothing is free you idiots! grow the [bleep] up. >> i democratic contender and to tweet this, he is not a scientist. he is a mechanical engineer. it's like tweeting out

george clooney as a doctor or harrison ford as an archaeologist. >> laura: he's not? >> beta or work launching his campaign. not a way to reboot he his camn campaign. >> i am cutting the ear hair. if you don't get it cut, you have to. >> it could've been worse. he could have taken this to his colonoscopy. let's thank god. >> laura: thankfully it wasn't a prostate deal. >> the only way it would have been better if tim conway was the barber. >> he was a genius. thank you so much. the "the ingraham angle" has been in the front lines of the fight we've gotten ourselves some detail on the immigration plant that will be announced tomorrow. house minority whip is your next and whether that bill can get any traction, don't go away.

you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. flonase.

(male announcer) for the love of mud, gravel, and trail dust. for the love of farm roads, dirt roads, and no roads. for the love of hunting, fishing, and working the land. for the love of conservation,

preservation, and restoration. introducing tracker off-road vehicles. designed and built on american soil for kicking up american soil. tracker off road. built for love of country. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. ♪ >> not one more american life should be lost because our lawmakers failed to secure our borders. that is why we are calling on congress to fix our terrible immigration laws. stop catch and release, and deadly sanctuary cities, stop the visa lottery program. >> laura: and a lot more,

president trump previewing what we can expect to hear the overall tomorrow. as we witnessed last week in south texas, this is beyond crisis point now. we have updates we will bring you tomorrow on new mexico. a story that has been completely lost on most in the media and we are told two main points on the immigration plan, security border and instituting this merit-based system. the goal is to reduce the number of illegals due to family ties. right now 66% of 1 million green cards are doled out because of family relationships and they want to invert that to a merit-based. joining us now, house minority whip, is there a coalition that would support flipping theme narrative from entire family trees coming in here to people we need because their jobs? i'm not for increasing the number of immigrants.

i think 1.1 million is enough. if you're going to keep it at the same number and not reduce it. >> there is no talk of increasing, there is talk on getting back to rule of law and securing the border and going to a merit-based system. right now we have some of the domestic laws on the books. we educate someone to be a computer scientist, they want to stay in america and we force them to leave the country to compete against us. we have the visa lottery where we literally plug names out of a hat. why don't we flip that narrative. give caps on different countries. if you are coming from india he went were 20 years but if you're coming from honduras you might wait six years. we talked about the family tree issue. let's get to a merit-based system where we have rule of law we get back to those basic foundational principles where you come to america. >> laura: you are seeing video

of what i saw last week at the border which is basically people -- i love the guy filming this. people just waiting for the patrol and they are pulling them up and processing them and 24 hours and releasing them. that goes to the asylum law, lindsey graham wants to address. are the democrats going to agree to any of this? will they own the issues? >> democrats and middle america are actually full for this. it shows the divide. you have to end catch and release, these magnets that are forcing people to come here and the breakdowns, that will be some of the things. >> laura: we had 100,000 people just coming in last mont month. one of the favorite global analyst said this. >> you cannot develop policy of people and compassion, it

results not just and hurt individuals but also hurt families. at the end of the day what they are saying is if you have to be amazingly brilliant, you have to be wider. this is reminiscent to be of what happened before the civil rights began. >> laura: all right. >> do they have any idea of what you are talking about? what to tell someone who has been waiting in line legally for ten years to come to america. you have laws that allow people to go in front? you can come here illegally in place of the person that has been waiting in line ten years. >> laura: two-point system, i want to see how this plays out. the offer of employment above a certain wage threshold, vocational certification. i think in the end this issue is properly messaged will be another huge winner for the president. although his numbers are not

good on immigration. have you seen this? i don't know if it's because people are seeing these videos enter frustrated like why doesn't he fix this. his numbers for syndication are not where he wants them to be. >> my been to a lot of swing states, there are the lines to see this president are unbelievable. >> laura: tell me about it. how much money you raised. >> a million dollars and it was sold out. people were turned away. this president has stood up for the things he has promised and he has a good immigration plan. >> laura: 4 million, one night and new orleans. >> 5,000 people illegally crossing a date and the democrats want to own that? >> laura: it's great to see you. conservative star michelle malkin censored by facebook, she will tell the story next. ♪ nutrition can seem overwhelmin.

even if you try to eat well, you might fall short in key nutrients. get more by adding one a day. it's the #1 multivitamin uniquely designed for men and women. one serving, once a day. one a day. and done.

♪ >> laura: the constitution prohibits the government from censoring not much of the speech, facebook is imposing its own brand of political correctness on its own platform. facebook bands alex jones, milo

and even louis farrakhan and now the social media giant is going to step further by censoring conservative commentator. she was opposing facebook censorship. she joins me know. her first television comments about all of this. the post that was taken down, i don't know how long it will be until i am next. i love it. kind of taunted them and you demonstrated what was going on but are you now on the verge of being just a band on facebook? >> i think a lot of us are and i think there is a commonality among many of the people who are being targeted on facebook and on twitter come on social media. i have to worry about my own website. it's hosted by wordpress which is now going after people based on their ideological viewpoints. i do believe that this is next x essential battle and i'm not saying that.

i've made a living over the last 25 years, and lots of it online and have never had to worry about this kind of deep platforming. i'm saying this because we need a vibrant marketplace of ideas. we need an informed citizen rate for constitutional republics to function and when facebook and silicon valley overloads have their thumb on free speech and that is a concern for all of us. there is a lot to people who have been deployed formed, folks might be uncomfortable with but all i did that caused facebook to censor me was simply stand up for a couple of my friends. now even i using my facebook platform that has 2.1 million followers could not even mention their names without being accused of violating the community standards of facebook.

there's a lot more going on and i believe it has to do with a 2020 election and making sure that somehow those of us who support the agenda of president trump are being throttled and managed and marginalized. i am sending up an alarm. i will continue to use my platform. >> laura: i love the defiance. he was on tv this weekend and he basically issued a warning. >> the way the rules of the internet have drawn today in my view have not been drawn are quite different to the way they are drawn and ten years' time but i think big tech companies have a choice. either they play ball and they try to play a responsible role in that debate before they try to docket altogether. >> laura: lucky europe has gotten all over facebook, tougher than the united states with privacy issues but he said we will have no choice. >> what two people do? people asked me after my speech

and over the past year and now that we have seen people disappear and be on percent on the one thing people can do is fight back with their pocketbooks and the voices they do have. support the people who have disappeared. there's website called fight the sensors that is helping people whose names i can't say on facebook, i would like to see if i can test the facebook live instrument function which is also being throttled. apparently if you go against their standards they will take that away. we have to fight back. >> laura: we will continue to talk about this with you at a later date, thank you so much. stay there guaranteed. plus with most insurance, it's no cost to you. >> mom: really? >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, ♪ safelite replace.

don't just dream book your next vacation.. ♪ be a booker at booking.com metastatic breast cancer is relentless, but i was relentless first. relentless about learning the first song we ever danced to. about teaching him to put others first. about helping her raise her first child. and when i was first diagnosed, my choice was everyday verzenio. it's the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. it gives us more time without cancer progressing. verzenio is the only cdk4 & 6 inhibitor approved with hormonal therapy that can be taken every day for postmenopausal women with hr+, her2- mbc. diarrhea is common, may be severe, or cause dehydration or infection. before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection. verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. serious liver problems can occur. symptoms include tiredness, appetite loss, stomach pain,

and bleeding or bruising. blood clots that can lead to death have occurred. tell your doctor if you have pain or swelling in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain, rapid breathing or heart rate, or if you are pregnant, nursing, or plan to be pregnant. common side effects include nausea, infections, low blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. my relentless reason: it's them. my choice with my doctor: it's verzenio. ask your doctor if everyday verzenio is right for your first treatment. >> laura: you ever wonder what it's like to have moves like jagger? ♪

75 years old, he is getting ready for his relaunch of his tour he had to put off because of the replacement. he is 75, he has eight kids and had his last kid at 73 with his 30-year-old partner. he is still moving. check out my new podcast. shannon bream takes it from here. >> shannon: i was tired just watching him. i can't keep up. good for him. thank you so much. we began with a fox news alert. national debate over abortion after alabama's government approves a near-total ban with an eye on the u.s. supreme court. critics of roe v. wade or misstep of the wrong wrong direction? president trump proposing a key campaign promise shutting down illegal immigration. we have n