and that is the story for this thursday night. martha will be back here tomorrow at 7:00 and i will see you tomorrow at 9:00 a.m. eastern. thank you for joining us tonight. tucker carlson is up next. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening, and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." an awful lot going on for a thursday night. despite the best efforts of prosecutors to hide the details, this show has obtained documents that revealed that jussie smollett did in fact fake his hate crime and show how prosecutors responded. possible they never planned to charge him in the first place. we have developments and details on that in just a few moments. >> tucker: first tonight a fox news alert the president has announced plans for new taxes on mexican imports as a response to the illegal immigration crisis. minutes ago the president tweeted this, quote: on june 10th, the united states will impose a 5% tariff on all goods coming into our

country from mexico until such time as illegal immigrants coming through mexico enter our country stop, the tariff will gradually increase until the illegal immigration problem is remedied at which time the tariffs will be removed. not a small thing. in a follow-up statement tonight the white house said the tariff will rise 5% every month until there is a 25% tax on every single import from mexico. that means every car, every computer, every piece of avocado put on toast at brunch. if this happens, it is big story. of course we will keep you posted on it as it develops. like there will. that's not the only thing happening in washington tonight. less than 48 hours ago, impeachment seemed like a remote possibility. speaker of the house was not for it. joe biden the leading presidential candidate had not come out in favor of it. now, just a couple days later it looks almost certain. why? not because we have learned

anything new about the president. we have not. we have not found a new probe of compromising documents. there is no blurry iphone video in which the president swears to vladimir putin. that information is probably not going to emerge because it doesn't exist and never has despite years of investigations and many millions spent trying to find it. nobody has found any evidence that the president included with russia in order to win the 2016 election. doesn't matter though robert mueller delivered a statement yesterday which which he said i couldn't prove the president committed a crime but i also couldn't prove he didn't commit a crime. on the basis of that, suddenly, democrats appear to be united tonight. we must impeach. >> anybody who looks at the politics of this, it's a thorny path. but i think history is going to look back at this moment and what we choose to do and see if we did the right thing. and i think the right thing right now is to hold this president accountable for his actions. >> we have to get the show on the road. we have to have these

investigations done on tv under the manner of impeachment inquiry. i don't think there is any way around that make everybody vote. make herb in the house vote. send it over to the senate. make them vote. put them on the record and make them live with those votes for the rest of their lives. >> impeachment is a process, not a thing. they need to move toward it strategically and they need to make sure they are bringing the american people along with them. >> i would suggest that he told us enough to interpret what he said as a referral for impeachment. >> tucker: that was a parade of democratic politicians mostly democratic presidential candidates and one fake republican. supposed to provide context and level headed context of what this might mean. that's not what wee have gotten the last two days. instead unending string of hyperbole and hysterics. >> we begin with a litany of lies from the president of

the united states one day after special counsel robert mueller again but this time on camera explained he did not clear the president of a crime. >> a president who theoretically can break any law he wants going forward so long as 34 senators decide to stick with him. >> mueller did not say the i word, i don't think anyone was bracing for that today. that's not how bob mueller rolls. >> he considers this an emergency. he considers this a very serious effort by russia to ircht fear with our election, that it happened and that it's going to happen again. >> tucker: a litany of lie and emergency. a president who can break any law. if you are that excited, go ahead and impeach the president. democrats ran last year on healthcare and income inequality. things that voters appear to be interested in. how excited will voters be to see the next year and a half blown on an impeachment trial that will not succeed, waste time and money and achieve nothing? it might be interesting to find out, actually. pelosi may be extreme but

she is not stupid. there's a reach that she has been against impeachment from day one. she knows it will hurt her own party. her party doesn't care. so, go ahead. impeach him. until then let's admit another fact. robert mueller's speech yesterday said a lot more about him and his investigation than it did the subject of his investigation. in his remarks yesterday mueller said it was important that, quote: the office's written work speak for itself. the written work, of course, is his report. we have had that for a month and obviously it didn't justify impeachment. so mueller decided to speak up and tip the scales in a different direction. that was the point of yesterday's comments. he said he was unable to exonerate the president of criminal activity. it's up to congress to decide what to do. of course, in a fair society. in all fair societies, prosecutors never exonerate people. prosecutors either charge people with crimes or they leave them alone. prosecutors are not supposed to release embarrassing material about private citizens unless it directly relates to a criminal offense.

like so many other people in washington though, mueller and his team forgot that basic principle and so thanks to their work our country will be suffering through another year of pointless political theater while the new problems fester and get worse. opioids, student loans, the border china. take your pick. there are so many. none of those will get fixed. impeachment show trial. depressing but we have no choice. sean davis has watched this very carefully, he co-founded the federalist. he joins us tonight to tell us what this reveals about the mueller investigation. sean, thanks a lot for coming on tonight. >> thanks for having me. >> i don't think we learned anything knew about trump yesterday. we learned probably some new things about mueller. what were they? >> i think we did. it was interesting in my view that he even held this press conference. because as said his report spoke for itself. this report 448 pages long which was released almost six weeks ago if it truly

spoke for itself he wouldn't have needed to speak for it yesterday. and speak for it he did. the most curious thing he did was it was two fold. he came out and said one we charged some russians for the stuff. but, by the way, everyone, even these russians are presumed innocent until they are found guilty of a crime. and then he immediately pivoted to trump and said but by the way this american who hasn't been charged with anything, well, we can't say he is innocent. but we can't say he is not not guilty. he inverted our typical standard of the rule of law which innocent until proven guilty and did he an extreme disservice both to the rule of law, to his reputation and to the department of justice in general. >> tucker: he didn't need to do this, of course, because as he said and you just reiterated the report purportedly speaks for itself. why did he do this? >> that's the million-dollar question. we know from past experience watching mueller that he is keenly sensitive to media narratives and how media tend to cover himself and

his team. he complained to mueller or to barr, excuse me, after he announced the principle conclusions of mueller's report and said, you know what? i really don't like how the media is covering. this and then, of course, that letter found its way newt media shortly thereafter. but the question i have is why should an independent supposedly impartial investigator like mueller care what the media is saying, especially if his work speaks for itself? how the media covers his work and his report when it's out there for all to read really should not be relevant to him. especially since his work is done. i think it's obvious that he was trying to pour gasoline on out impeachment flier. >> right. >> he was displeased how the narrative was proceeding especially the fact there was no collusion. he felt he needed to personally go out and reset the narrative which is not his job. >> he wanted trump impeached because is he an angry moralizer like so many prosecutors. the democratic congress didn't do that. and so he came out to prod them. that's what you are saying? >> well, he kind of

referenced that in his own comments where he said, of course, it would be unconstitutional if i were to indict the president. but, you know, there is other ways that can be done wink, wink, nod, nod. i thought it was a really embarrassing speck kel that he put himself through one completely inverting the typical standard of the rule of law and then acting as if his job was to serve as impeachment counsel a and prod them until they did what he wanted. >> tucker: so many people have degraded themselves in the past two years. it's hard even to keep track anymore. sean davis, great to see you tonight. thank you. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: after mueller's remarks yesterday it wasn't simply out democratic presidential field that lost its mind. hollywood obviously did too led by actor robert de niro he started a new public service announcement that claims the president obstructed justice. watch. this you may have seen me on "saturday night live" as a certain federal prosecutor that was acting.

but now we are going to hear from some real federal prosecutors. i have so much admiration for their intelligence and dedication to their work. recently other a thousand former federal prosecutors who served under both republican and democratic presidents have united to sign a statement to help americans understand what's actually in the mueller report. their conclusion should trouble us all. in the words of the mueller report no person is above the law. >> tucker: no person is above the law. but certain rich well-known people would like an outside role in guiding what america does next. robert de niro would fit into that small category. this is part of a long term obsession continu di nero has wh president trump. >> it's beyond surreal what this guy has done. >> have you called him a mutt. >> he is a mutt. >> you still believe is he a mutt. >> every word i said then i mean today. >> this [bleep] idiot is the

president. the guy is a [bleep] fool. come on. >> how dare he say the things he does. of course i want to punch him in the face. [cheers] >> tucker: the man who yells at his driver speaking on behalf of all of us in the rich person world. stein one of our favorite columnists joins us tonight i don't understand and i know we have talked about it before. why is it if you are robert de niro or any of these people at the pinnacle you are monday maniacal about trump. why the on sessions? >> i think it gets back to the the famous line back when nixon won and the new york's film critic wrote that she didn't know anyone who voted for nixon. >> tucker: yeah. >> in this case it's even worse that they don't know anyone. they loathe trump. they don't know anyone who voted for trump. therefore, because they see themselves as exemplars as

everyday ordinary americans trump cannot have won which is why this whole russian collusion thing got going. it's interesting to me, for example, we are doing real damage to important aspects of our society this letting robert de niro make the running on this. robert de niro introduces a group of about 12 prosecutors on that video representing 1,000. democrats and republicans who say that trump is guilty of obstruction of justice. now, two things. if you thought trump was really guilty of obstruction of justice, and you wanted to do impartial justice, why would you stick a man who is most famous for saying f trump at the tony awards on the front of that video? whatever that is, that's not even the potential impartial justice. and secondly, jewels to go back to what you and sean were talking about with this new standard whereby you have to be proclaimed innocent why th by the state.

it's not enough just to be not guilty you have to be proclaimed innocent. we have something weirder going on with these prosecutors. we have a jury of prosecutors that is complete alice in wonderland interpretation of the balance of common law law for a thousand years. it's a complete nonsense, tucker. >> >> tucker: doesn't it make it easier? you don't really have to worry about the outcome when you have the prosecutors acting as the jury, you know the verdict is going to be guilty, right? isn't that streamline process? >> yeah. i know. especially with the stinking corrupt federal justice said on your show before. you know, this is why it's important to know the date at which robert mueller knew there was no collusion or conspiracy. >> tucker: that's right. >> because everything after that just goes to the american method of the process, the punishment. and for trump to be indicted

for obstruction of justice for something he said six months after robert mueller knew there was no collusion or conspiracy mountain of perversions that federal justice has heaped on traditional common law protections. >> tucker: i would not want to be charged with a crime right now. i never thought i would say that i would be worried. >> no. i will drive you across the border to canada. get under the tarp in my pickup, tucker. it's a free deal. because you can't win with these guys. >> tucker: feels that way. mark steyn, great to see you tonight, thank you. >> thanks a lot, tucker. >> tucker: speaking of justice gone off the rails, there is news in the jussie smollett case. we have our hands in a trove of documents from the chicago police. they tell you a lot about the case and we will take you through them straight ahead. hey! i'm bill slowsky jr.,

i live on my own now! i've got xfinity, because i like to live life in the fast lane. unlike my parents. you rambling about xfinity again? you're so cute when you get excited... anyways... i've got their app right here, i can troubleshoot. i can schedule a time for them to call me back, it's great! you have our number programmed in? ya i don't even know your phone anymore...

excuse me?! what? i don't know your phone number. aw well. he doesn't know our phone number! you have our fax number, obviously... today's xfinity service. simple. easy. awesome. i'll pass. ♪ >> tucker: we have a fox news alert for you at the top of the show we told you about the president's new plan to tax mexican imports. this is a big story and may have given it short. we wanted to bring out more details. june 10th the president says the united states will enact a 5% tariff on every single good of any kind coming across the border from 34ebgs mexico into the united states until the mexican government clamps down on illegal immigration into our country. this is mick mulvaney speaking to reporters a moment ago. very firm belief that the mexican government can and will do more to help the situation on southern border. we are asking mexico to do what it can because coming will not. we fully believe mexico can

stop people from coming in on our southernward border if they do that the tariffs will not go into place. this is not the white house the is saying part of a trade dispute. this is purely about immigration. apparently the white house spoke to republican leaders and leaders of both parties really on capitol hill and says that the republicans they spoke to are for it. so, this may be one of the most significant developments in the immigration saga in quite some time and obviously we'll continue to follow it closely. also measure developments as we told a minute ago tonight in the jussie smollett case. chicago police just released new documents that contain hundreds of pages. what do those documents reveal? trace gallagher is going through them and going through to to give as you view of that trace? >> tucker, the 460 pages of documents one of the big reveals concerns the tick tock or the timing of when the charges against smollett were dropped. kim foxx dropped the 16 counts and chicago police

said they were blindsided but the documents tell a different story saying that nearly a month earlier on february 28th, the day smollett was indicted, quote: assistant states attorney erisa lanier informed detectives that she felt the case would be settled with smollett paying the city of chicago 10,000 in restitution and doing community service. and that's exactly what happened a month later when chicago police said this. watch. >> we found out about when you all did. prosecutors have their discretion, of course. we still have to work with the states attorneys office. i'm sure we have some conversation after this. >> now chicago police say the settlement was supposed to include smollett admitting guilt. but that's not what the documents say and that's clearly not what happened. we're also learning it was during a supplemental police report that jussie smollett remembered that his attackers yelled, quote: this is maga country followed by a racial slur. molt identified his

attackers as being white saying he could see through the eye holes of their ski masks but now we know on the advice of his attorney, smollett refused to look at a photo line-up of potential suspects that included the osundairo brothers. and when the brothers were arrested. smollett admitted that he knew them but told police they could not be the suspects because, quote: they are black as sin. smollett later said he assumed his attackers were white because they said maga country. police videos by the way in this case are coming next week. we have those for you. tucker? >> tucker: trace gallagher, amazing. thank you for that kevin graham is president of the chicago fraternal order of police and he joins us tonight. mr. graham, thank you very much for coming on. these details, do they add to your understanding of what happened with jussie smollett? >> well, certainly there were some facts that came out today that i was unaware of. certainly i believe that when the prosecutors told the police that they thought that the detectives thought

that that was how they believed it was going to end. i don't think they actually thought that was going to be true. i thought they felt that was just one of the states' attorneys opinions. but they were concerned enough to put it into the reports. now, i don't believe i have ever had a states attorney, assistant states attorney tell the police to stop investigating the case, which is what occurred in this case. >> tucker: so, before -- we get to how that happened because there obviously is a story here, obviously. have you ever seen a case where a prosecutor declines to prosecute, with an agreement without requiring the person, the guilty person to admit guilt? >> never seen that never seen that in 35 years of police work. >> tucker: so clearly, i mean, somebody talked to somebody. no offense, it's chicago. so, of course that happened. what do you think actually happened? >> you know, at this point it's speculation. i know that files from the states attorneys office from

the prosecutor's office, and kim foxx, those articles are going to be coming out very soon. i think they are going to be very interesting to find out who shy talked to, when she talked to them. and what transpired because that is coming. look, we have got a crime problem here in chicago. and kim foxx is not prosecuting the criminals. this is one case. but we have a number of cases. that's why the police chiefs in cook county stood with us more than a month ago and complained about this prosecutor saying she is just not doing her job. we need a prosecutor to prosecute. we need people to be held accountable for the yims thecrimesthey commit otherwise e law doesn't mean anything. >> tucker: her response is criticism of her is racism. how do you respond to that? >> you know what? i mean, it's ridiculous. we don't care about the color of somebody's skin. we don't care about their

sexual orientation. all we care about is putting criminals in jail who actually commit crimes and if she can't get on board with that then maybe she needs to find another avenue in which to do her work. because clearly prosecution is not her forte. >> tucker: no. that's obvious. i feel sorry for you guys trying to do your best under these circumstances. >> thank you. thanks for having me. >> tucker: thank you. i appreciate it. quick update to a story developing at this hour. we have been reporting on the president's plans to tax mexican imports at 5% start on june 10th. mick mulvaney previously said apparently the white house spoke to leadership in both parties. the white house has just corrected that statement. the press is now being informed that the white house did not speak to democrats before announcing this plan to tax mexican goods so we don't know how the leaders, for example, of the democratic caucus in the house will respond. but we will find out soon. and we will bring it to you. well, for as long as anyone in this country can

remember, big government seemed like the threat. the only real threat to your basic rights as an american. that's not true anymore. woke capitalism. the left wing big companies are owe little bit rating the bill of rights. we will explain how that works and why. after the break. longer hours... eyes today are stressed! but ocuvite has vital nutrients to help protect them. ocuvite. eye nutrition for today.

>> tucker: to weeks ago georgia lawmakers passed what they called a heart beat bill it bans abortion few weeks of peg nancy when a fetal heart beat you may agree or not agree with the law. you can't call it illegitimate voters in georgia voterred for lawmakers that represent their values that's hour democratic systems are designed to work. that's the point. you think the people pretending to defend our democracy from the elections would understand. they will don't care to understand it. they believe democracy is when a tiny group of rich people imposes its values on

everyone else by force. bob iger is the ceo of disney. he doesn't live anywhere near the state of georgia. he made nearly $66 million last year therefore he believes he can control what happens in the state of georgia. watch. >> well, i think if it becomes law, it will be very difficult to produce there. i rather doubt we will. i don't think, one, i think many people who work for us will not want to work there. and we'll have to heed their wishes in that regard. right now we are watching it very carefully. i guess there is some speculation it could be enacted some time after the first of the year. i think it's also likely to be challenged in the courts and that could delay it. we are being careful and cautious about it. but, if it becomes law, i don't see how it's practical for us to continue to shoot there. >> tucker: got that? the company that brought you mini mouse and goofy and pirates of the caribbean now

demands that you approve of abortion or they will punish you. netflix is on board with this. that company currently films a number of shows in georgia. if the state doesn't appeal its abortion law the pull out. remarkable change in american life in a very short period of time. it wasn't that long ago that it was citizens who boycotted companies they disagreed with. now it's corporations who boycott citizens. what happened? it's not hard to figure out what happened. for generations consumers and voters held the real power in this country. but not anymore. now corporations are in charge and they are happy to boss you around on behalf of the activist left. they will lie about it of course and tell you it's all a matters of conscience as if they had consciences. filmed its show marco polo in malaysia. in case you haven't visited malaysia recently being gay is crime there most of the country lives under sharia law. abortion is also illegal in malaysia and columbia where

it filmed its show narcos. disney by the way just filmed its upcoming live mulan film in china which is police state huge parts of the internet are banned and people are executed for having the wrong opinions and in some cases abortion is mandatory. so, no, disney and netflix aren't really worried about anyone's rights no matter what their flax claim. their real concern, their only concern is power. women with children might be tempted to put the needs of their hone families before those of shareholders. abortion solves that problem. families shrink or disappear entirely. women are free to devote their lice to the company reliable worker bees. corporations get to expand labor poll, lower wages all about deliver pies lectures giving women opportunities we are feminists now, huh-uh. it's a grotesque scam. remarkably effective somewhere in 1990s america realized if they did the

bidding of the left on social issues they could get a pass on everything else. freeze wages, destroy the environment. strangle free speech. limit privacy. in general they could make the public life much worse all the while they could get richer than any class of people in human history and nobody would say anything. so that's exactly what they did. and they are still doing it. sales force is a major tech company that sales software mostly to businesses. today sales force announced it won't work with customers that sell semiautomatic firearms or magazines gun control groups too many rounds. citigroup would allow stores to use credit card supervisors. that's where we are today. it's not hard to imagine what it might be like tomorrow. what if for example corporate america decided to punish gun owners in addition to gun sellers? you have a firearm at home can you no longer buy car insurance. you can't use facebook. you kant open a checking account. you can't have a credit card. you can't stay in hotels. libertarians would tell you

that's just fine. it's just the free market ought work. if you don't like it, open your own credit card company, but you would have to be a moron to believe them. in fact, that would be the end of the second amendment. the words would remain in the bill of rights entirely symbolic. big companies would have are rendered them meaningless. not a right if you can't exercise it. that's where we are heading. not far off. conservatives have been trained to see government as the only real threat to human freedom and last 100 years it may have been true. not true anymore. the tyranny of woke capital is real and terrifying. just because they are selling you products doesn't mean it's not a dick share theship. ethan, i would think this might be one subject on which you and i might find common cause. i'm amazed by how many on the left are more than happy to give up their principles that they defended for generations because some big company is making liberal

noises. does this terrify you as much as it terrifies me? >> it doesn't only because we have such a track record from the right as well. i mean we have chick-fil-a and hobby lobby that went all the way to the supreme court. no, it does a little bit because we shouldn't even be having the conversation. it's happening on both sides, tucker. >> tucker: no, it's not happening on both sides. actually it is the left. >> it absolutely is. >> tucker: name a large multinational corporation in this country that's right of center? >> well, i just named one chick-fil-a and props bass pro shops and hobby lobby. >> tucker: up against american express and bank of america. really? >> the point is people -- these are companies that put values out there. >> tucker: okay. so, you're okay with a

company like disney doing business in china or netflix doing business in malaysia where human rights are an after thought in malaysia, homosexual yeattle is illegal that's totally cool because they make progressive noises when they are in the united states? you are willing to overlook that? that's what you are saying? >> absolutely not what i'm saying. so china and malaysia clearly have significant problems. but what we have here or disney has an influence in the united states. we have control over our own country. georgia is moving away from women having a right to control their own bodies while simultaneously we have groups on the right who reject providing birth control, hobby lobby again. you would think if you want to cut down on abortion we should make free birth control readily available everywhere. >> tucker: where is the closest hobby lobby to you? havhave you ever been in a hobby lobby before? >> no, i usually don't walk into i don't have that kind of hobbies that i go to the

lobby. it went to the supreme court. >> tucker: do you think that a woman's first loyalty should be to the company she works for or to her family? >> i think her first loyalty should be to herself and her family and if she believes in god it should be to god and her country. companies shouldn't be the first place of loyalty. not usually, tucker. >> tucker: does it make you a little bit nervous. it's a position of companies that you're duty ought to be to them and to shareholders. and that's why they are weighing in on a question as intimate as the question of abortion. okay? so does it make you a little bit nervous that disney or netflix have strong feelings about abortion? that doesn't bother you at all? would it bother you if they had strong feelings about eugenics? they might. >> yeah. that's a much bigger discussion of why companies have first amendment rights. i have debated this with other people. >> tucker: i'm not denying the first amendment. they are actively in favor

of abortion. why do you think that is? because they are so progressive or maybe there is another reason. >> i don't think they are active live in favor. >> tucker: yes, they are. >> they are not actively in favor of abortion. they are actively nafer women having rights over their own body. collection of cells day three of conception is thought a baby until the soul has entered the body and we are not even having that rational conversation. >> tucker: the law specifies after a heart beat can be detected they are arguing in favor of abortion. i'm just wondering have you asked yourself why? like what is in it for them? companies are rational. why do you think they are in favor of it? have you ever asked yourself that? >> no, no. tucker, disney this particular has lady on issues like lbgtq for inclusion of their employees. abortion rights and women to have control. >> tucker: all right. ethan, great to see you tonight.

>> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: after the break we have got final exam. can you beat our professionals at remembering the strange and obscure news that happened this past week? find out in just a moment ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> oh the happiest moment of the week. it's time for final exam where the top minds of cable news gather to see who has been paying the closest attention to all the weird things that have happened over the past seven days. this week our defending champion is kennedy who hosts a program called kennedy on fox business which is excellent. her challenger is fox business correspondent susan li who is very smart. who will win tonight? not clear. we're about to find out. thank you both for coming on. you know the rules but i'm going to read them for the sake of our audience, for

those who have had a few drinks, hands on buzzers. i ask the questions. the first one to buzz in gets to answer the question. you must wait to finish asking before you answer. every correct answer is worth a single point. if you get one wrong, the cruel math of final exam subtracts a point from your total. best of five wins. are you ready? >> kennedy: yes, okay. >> tucker: i'm rooting for both of you. this is multiple choice so wait until you hear all the options. ihop the restaurant chain is playing with its name again. it now tells us the p in its name stance for which new hybrid dish? is it apartment? the potato burger? b, the pancake pizza or c, pasta thei chiros. >> potato burger, a. >> tucker: i don't know if i believe you go to the tape. >> try a pan pizza?

hold the butter and cheese it's pan cake pizza. >> tucker: pancake pizza. >> they changed it b to a p to be burger. >> that was last year. >> tucker: ihop used to be international house of pancakes. >> kennedy: that was b and back to a p. >> tucker: i had no answer. another multiple choice ford the automobile company is developing a delivery robot called digital. it will bring your package to you'r your door. which robotic form does it take a a light weight drone, b a mini tank or c a human mihumanoid susan? >> c a humanoid. is it humanoid, c?

♪ ♪ >> walk like one? >> yep. and that's how it begins. and then is he going to go in the family's house. have his way with the base life forms and steal everything and give it to his overlords. >> tucker: i'm rooting for an american company but i don't think that's going to end well. back to par 0-0. question three. this is not a multiple choice. on his recent trip to japan. the president became the first u.s. president in history to attend which kind of sporting event? >> sumo wrestling. >> tucker: susan, sumo wrestling. is the answer sumo wrestling?

[cheers] >> there you go. >> so our judges, who have very much like robert mueller they don't want to let the results speak for themselves they want to editorialize a little bit. said both of you clicked in almost exactly the same time but susan by milliseconds won that wanted our viewers to know that. question 4 a video chip emerged this week of a democrat 2020 candidate apologizing to staffers for being a, quote: giant a-hole. [laughter] i want to let you know this is directly from the judges i'm merely mario mere marry net. first try question to susan the question had not been

completed for the other contestant. susan, do you have an answer? who was that? you can pass if you want and we will go back to kennedy. >> um, i'm going to say buttigieg. >> tucker: you are going to say pete buttigieg. is it pete buttigieg? >> i love you guys more than you will ever know. and i know a giant [bleep] to be around sometimes. you will never allow my shortcomings to get in the way of something the state has never seen. >> tucker: you are not the only person who was forgotten about beto o'rourke. don't feel bad at all. we are going into i think there is precedent for this. we have to check the logbooks not much 0-0, sudden death. final question. this one is multiple choice. here we go. the british prime minister theresa may resigned this week. but she was upstaged by the

cat of downing street, an actual cat who was posing outside her residence before a staff took the cat inside. what is the name of that feline? is it a, pebbles? b, norman, or c, larry? kennedy? >> kennedy: i'm going to say norman. it sounds british. >> tucker: you are are going to say norman it does. norman name? is it norman? ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: amazing. ♪ ♪ >> let me say. >> kennedy: take the cat away and give him to julian assange. [buzzer] >> tucker: who could use one. well, we have a winner with a total accrued point value of 0.

susan, you win. >> tucker: okay. nice job. you are the winner of our eric wemple mug you did a lot better on this show than he did. we will send this to you by inner office mail. >> kennedy: i'm change the cat's name now to norman. stuck tuck you approached this game with reason. because of course it would be norman because that's an english name or french name. >> norman fell, mr. roper a famed brit. one would think. >> tucker: logic has no place here on final exam. thank you both. congratulations, susan, you are the winner see you next week. see you next week we hope every thursday see if you can tune in to beat the experts. we'll be right back. ♪ ♪

. . . my reputation was trashed online,

i felt completely helpless. my entire career and business were in jeopardy. i called reputation defender. they were able to restore my good name. eaking campaign to give every american the right to remove old, inaccurate search results by going to righttobeforgotten.org. if you have search results that are wrong or unfair, call reputation defender at 1-877-866-8555.

>> tucker: when you think of college commencement address should be about addressing the achievements of the kids are

graduating, but give it to hillary clinton to make it about hillary clinton. she delivered the commencement address at hunter college and used it to complain against him a big surprise, russia stole the presidency from her! watch. >> there may not be change in our streets but make no mistake mistakes. we are witnessing an assault on the rule of law and the foundation of our democracy. just today before this graduation ceremony started, we heard from the special counsel robert mueller which said there are multiple systemic efforts to interfere in one of our elections and that's allegation deserves the attention of every american. >> tucker: spencer brown, no one who loves are enough to tell her not to do this, obviously. put yourself in the position of

the graduate, a position you were in fairly recently but what is she making of this, your parents of their graduating, and this happened? >> a phenomenon of liberal speakers invited to give this fast lane a lesson to the graduating class that should be inspirational, sending them good career and advice. once again the hillary clinton, a liberal being invited but nothing spiritual she could say so i do not know why a school would invite her convincing why she is not currently the president. >> tucker: you do not she's inspirational? an adult who doesn't want to hear whining from an elderly woman why she deserved to be president but the russians told it. >> whining with jokes she flopped. she made a joke about madam president. you don't need to keep pointing that out especially to a room of people you're supposed to inspire about the future. it makes sense that you'd fall

back to what she best establish, blame the victim, blame everybody but herself or why she is not president. >> tucker: may be where looking at this the wrong way. maybe if your college itself is a joke, the faculty is unimpressive. the courses are uninspiring, dumb, disconnected from actual human knowledge, maybe it's fitting that you have a joke commencement speaker talking about herself. >> we saw her hitting all the same topics of a jug of education the last seven years per hit on everything from pushing students getting involved, pushing gun control, blame facebook for being sexist, not taking down the down the do nancy pelosi. if you watch this speech, it's hilarious because she speaks with a sort of moral clarity as if she's never done anything wrong in her life it we know that is not the case, but she still runs around like she's the adult in the room trying to impart her wisdom to these students when her own judgment had been flawed in the past.

speak three how >> tucker: how long does this continue. you are a young man. the imagine your kids going at hunter college -- will this persist? with people wise up and realize the system is a joke? >> you think there will be a breaking point when students paying all this money, their parents paying all this money, turn around and not able to get a job you think that somehow this would be a connection where the education system is not of a service. we do our 28th annual commencement speaker survey, we've talked about the college's classes that are offered. it's all a joke. >> laura: the bubble is about to blow up. great to see you. thank you. so what's happening in the skies of the united states? after decades of ignoring it, the department of defense are finally willing to ask real questions, we've covered a ton of information in our ongoing investigation into it. we'll have it for you tomorrow night exclusively on this show. remarkable.

even if you think it's hard to shock you? you should watch this but we'll be back tomorrow. 8:00 p.m. the show that speaks sworn enemy to lying, prosody, smugness, and especially groupthink for good men from washington. sean hannity live from new york city right now. >> tucker: tucker, great show. good to see you. welcome to "hannity." fox news alert tonight. the president now taking major action to secure our southern border. just moments ago, announcing a brand-new tariff on mexico, pressing this country now to stem the flow of migrants that are overwhelming our entire immigration system. we will have a lot more later in the program. first though tonight, the deep state is in a compete , a complete panic mode. the walls are closing in. days away as we been told on the release of major documents exposing the attorney general says he