even if you think it's hard to shock you? you should watch this but we'll be back tomorrow. 8:00 p.m. the show that speaks sworn enemy to lying, prosody, smugness, and especially groupthink for good men from washington. sean hannity live from new york city right now. >> tucker: tucker, great show. good to see you. welcome to "hannity." fox news alert tonight. the president now taking major action to secure our southern border. just moments ago, announcing a brand-new tariff on mexico, pressing this country now to stem the flow of migrants that are overwhelming our entire immigration system. we will have a lot more later in the program. first though tonight, the deep state is in a compete , a complete panic mode. the walls are closing in. days away as we been told on the release of major documents exposing the attorney general says he expects the attorney general

horowitz to report on fisa abuse any day. we also have the other buckets, exposing what's the real election scandal, one to robin election and secondly undermine a duly elected president. but first, as we told you last night, the russia hoax? it's dad. it's buried. it's nonexistent. by the way, nine hours after his nine and a half minute statement fueling democrats' hopes again and more hysteria and breathless reporting, robert mueller has a ready backtrack. last night, their department of justice and the special counsel, they actually had to release a joint statement to correct what mueller said. in other words, mueller needed to walk back everything he said yesterday in a dramatic fashion because he totally contradicted everything that he had been saying. clarification, well, it wasn't exactly that. but said this.

for the olc, office of legal counsel's opinion, that mueller would have found the president obstructed justice. mueller's statement entirely consistent with the attorney general's previous remarks in spite of the media mob's coverage. remember, barr said that robert mueller told him over and over again and numerous other people heard it and explaining just weeks ago, mueller stated three times to us in that meeting that he emphatically was not saying that but for the office of legal counsel's opinion, he would've found obstruction. in other words, the justice department policy of whether you can or cannot indict a sitting president, was never an issue, period. what does this mean? the attorney general barr said today that mueller could've reached a conclusion as to whether there was any criminal activity, but he chose not to. take a look. >> i personally felt he could've

reached a decision. >> in your view he could've reached a decision. >> he could've reached a conclusion. to indict a president while he is in office but he couldn't reach a decision as to whether it was criminal activity. he had his reasons for not doing it, which he explained. i'm not going to, you know, argue about those reasons. but when he didn't make a decision, the deputy attorney general rod rosenstein and i felt it was necessary for us as the heads of the department to reach that decision. >> sean: 's of the attorney general, by the way, that's because democrats wanted to get rid of the old in the mending console statute. that means the attorney general is the final arbiter. he made up his mind. along with the attorney general rod rosenstein and the nonpartisan office of legal counsel. they were all crystal-clear. the media mob -- let me spell it out for you. zero findings that the president obstructed justice.

none. by the way, it has nothing to do with some justice department policy. not because of a legal, constitutional restriction, but because there was no evidence. make no mistake. this is no cover-up, no case against the president, no collusion, no underlying climb down the crime, the obstruction. in other words, the opposite of hillary. but for the extreme socialist democrats, the rage trumped media mob, though they refused to focus in on the major truth of this issue. ask yourself this, why didn't the media mob report with the same intensity, the release of the clarifying remarks of robert mueller after he botched it yesterday morning? why didn't they put the same passion in it as the night and a half minutes of robert mueller? here's another question. why are they so lazy, so predicable, so partisan, why are they fake news? why do they feign moral outrage

and then purposely fail to tell their viewers, as little as they are, the truth? how did it become so partisan, so political, so corrupt, that they refuse simple questions and inform their viewers. that clarification of mueller was massive. the correction was massive. so why do they choose to continue to paddle another round of lives and conspiracy theories and advance their hoax yet again. why did they choose to act as partaken hicks instead of serious journalists? by the way, 98.9% of media got it wrong. it's the talk show hosts, we do straight news, we do opinion, but we are honest about it, and even sports and culture. they say they are objective. they are anything but. but why are they choosing to put fake news narratives over the facts that after two plus years

of lying and choosing to relentlessly smear, slander, besmirch anybody who dares to question their lack of ethics and not objectivity. look at this tonight. "the new york times"? they are now scared, taking notice, and they are realizing, oh, they've been duped by the conspiracy tv media mob. look at this new report. "new york times" is warning editors and reporters against appearing on prime time shows on the fake snooze see and then and conspiracy tv msnbc. why would the "new york times" not go on their favorite programs? we who refused to ask tough questions to begin with it like, did robert mueller forget his previous statements in yesterday's remarks, or did he intentionally muddied the waters to fuel the democrats' unrelenting impeachment rage psychosis? now the president is standing strong, not letting himself be a punching bag, taking direct aim

at the former special counsel as he should, and his partisan witch hunt. let's take a look. >> robert mueller should've never been chosen. because he wanted the fbi's job and he didn't get it and the next day he was picked as special counsel. so you tell somebody, i'm sorry, you can't have the job. and then you after say that, he's going to make a ruling on you? it doesn't work that way. i think mueller is a true and never trumper, somebody who dislikes donald trump. and despite $40 million, 18 trump haters, including people who work for hillary clinton and some of the worst human beings on earth, they got nothing. it's pretty amazing. >> sean: the president, he didn't stop there. calling out the special counsel more than a conflict of interest, writing "robert mueller came to the oval office to be claimed director of the fbi. he was already in that position for 12 years, i told him no

back. next day, he was named special counsel, total conflict of interest." the president is right. here's the big take away of all of this. robert mueller, i'm telling you. scared to death to testify. why click make you have to answer real tough questions fro, congressman mark meadows, congressman devin nunes, and others. by the way, devin nunes will be here in just moments. he would be afraid to answer questions like this to mueller. "when did you know there was no collusion?" by the way, if you had all this time to investigate, taxi medallions, loan applications, deck decades old taxing returns, how did you have no time to investigate the origins of hillary clinton's dirty russian dos here which was used to commit a premeditated fraud on the pfizer court, undermine a duly elected president after

an attempt to steal an election election. also to disseminate russian lies to the american people and spy on the trump campaign, which as "the new york times" reported, that dossier was likely russian disinformation from the very beginning. mr. mueller, why did you hire a team of partisan democrats, not a single republican -- you couldn't find one? no one? why would you ever hire a guy, your pit bull, by the name of andrew weissmann, a guy who has a horrific history of abuse of power. remember commit in the powells book, "license to lie," exculpatory evidence. was at the hillary clinton election night, the party that never happened. why would you hire the hillary clinton jeannie how could he in good faith ignore the single biggest abuse of power, corruption scandal in modern political history which, by the way, had to do with the

russian lies and their attempt to steal an election in 2016? judicial watch's tom fitton, fighting back in a huge way. tonight, he is calling for action on mueller's attack on the rule of law for turning it on its head and abandoning long-held pricing rhetorical norms. by the way, don't forget, about his cozy relationship with the super patriot james comey. nothing like smelly walnut they hate trump democrats, they still don't care. they rely on the same disparagement that happens every single second of every single minute of every single hour of every single day for they are on a mission, they want to take down the president at all cost per doesn't matter how great of a job he's doing. it wouldn't matter if he cured cancer. every single waking moment a public trial against the president. the president has not only been successful, but under the worst

conditions that any president has had to start the presidency under, regardless of facts, truth, reality. people who have no agenda to make us more safe, more prosperous, more secure. as any democrat talked about that recently? no plan for america's future, our kids, our grandkids, no plan to grow the economy, make jobs, make us energy independent. no plans to solve the crisis at our border. no plans to make a stronger abroad. and you've got this pathetically weak field of 2020 radicals. they spend their time and coherently rambling about how much they hate the president and the new green deal which will en engine, oil and gas, cows and airplanes. can't wait. everything else will be free. the collusion hoax is dead and finished, in spite of all the noise you hear, it's done. four in separate investigations, four, and all of them found --

fdr nine month investigation, house intel investigation, bipartisan senate investigation, and the mueller report, four of them, no conspiracy collusion. and we now know from mr. mueller's retraction, absolutely no consideration of the department of justice policy as whether you can or cannot indict a sitting president. here with reaction, the judicial watch president, tom fitton and fox news contributor sarah carton. tell us what you are now looking for? >> mueller turned out to be a part of sin. you thought he was above the fray, but his press conference or press event this week show that he's out for mueller, suggested he's a crook and needs to be impeached without basis. he took this approach that he may have committed a crime, i'm not sure. but i cannot prove he's in this sense, he turns the rule of law on his head, as you know.

people like president trump are presumed innocent and suggest otherwise from the podium of the justice department is a wild abuse of power. that's the alice of wonder one "alice in wonderland" approach to justice. he wants to sentence into impeachment? this is inappropriate for the justice department to be doing. certainly an official. there needs to be an ethics investigation and what went on with that statement and, frankly, and ethics audit of the entire mueller operation, because as you laid out, there are serious concerns about the way mueller operated that team there and what they did in terms of the early morning -- >> sean: wiseman, jeannie ray, no republican investigators at all. i want mr. mueller to testify before mark meadows. i want these questions answered. i don't think he has the courage

to do it. >> did he interview himself? has the president mentioned? did he interview himself as part of this obstruction investigation related to the mueller firing? he's a witness! >> sean: let me go to sara carter. let's go to this clarification. robert mueller went into this long, drawn out, nine and a half minutes. couldn't consider it because of justice department policy until the department of justice, the attorney general, and the special counsel's office, had to say, oops, we said the opposite in the past number of times. sorry about that. of course the media ignores it. >> this is what's going on here, sean. this is talking to sources and just common sense. they absolutely know that president trump did not commit a conspiracy, there was no obstruction. but they have to focus on that. they have to push everything in that direction because now the

attorney general and the department of justice have a magnifying glass on all of these former obama officials who basically violated the law from what we can see based on the evidence that's out there already, evidence that we've already seen. remember, there's so much more evidence that we haven't seen yet. so much more information. they basically violated the law, you have james comey, john brennan, clapper, mccabe comeau lisa page. others who were involved, and you have the group of bureaucrats. remember, they are the ones they are done. they are no longer in their positions of power, but you have people who worked with them, people who are part of their group that are still trying to protect them. and that's exactly what mueller is doing. when mueller went out and gave at nine and a half minute rambling speech to kind of rally up the democrats, he did that on purpose. they are now fighting for their lives.

they are fighting to stay afloat. because they know that they could be charged. >> sean: the clarification contradiction everything he said. >> absolutely. they had to come out and clarify, but mueller is a smart man. mueller knew exactly what he was saying when he went up there and did that. we didn't count on is he as attorney general william barr who will not back down publicly. he went out, throw his hands up in the air now. exactly what he has to say. >> he came out and gave us fault statement. he gave a false statement. he said he didn't come out because of that opinion. who gave him that statement? >> sean: you have to blame the guy who spoke them. reading from a prompter or some paper, but we'll get to the bottom of it. >> it's a big comparison, sean. >> sean: thank you, sir. joining us now, house

intelligence committee republican congressman devin nunes. it is now inevitable, congressman. it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when. we have talked about five separate, exculpatory evidence, more. now the president the classifieds, the game changer, the ig report, and mr. gorham, and john huber, and the attorney general. tell us what you see unfolding and when. >> i want to start to make sure what mueller did yesterday, i thought he did a pretty good job but people forget one important point. mueller trying to do this a victory lap. he tried to talk about the russians they found, the russians they prosecuted. i want to remind people that the house republicans on the intelligence committee had that over a year ago. and mueller, or if he's so concerned about these russians, why did they obstruct our report from getting out?

so all report is still heavily redacted, sean. so mueller -- exactly right, he lit the fuse. you ask about what you come first? i think the thing that should come first is, number one, we still don't even know what mueller was supposed to be investigating. we do not have that document. we know that he's talked about conspiracy to collude? well, when he walks in the door, he knew there was no evidence of collusion. we know that because the lead investigator said so on text messages. he was so blatantly dishonest yesterday that he says, well, the office of legal counsel says that you can't indict a sitting president. well, he should have been gone after day two. he has no russians, except for the fusion and clinton russians, and possibly the dirty cop at the eye russians. that's the only russians he has to show connections to the mueller campaign. clearly the clinton operation is heavily working with russians or russian disinformation. he didn't take time to look into

any of that. and you have this, he comes and says well, there is no possibility to indict the president on obstruction of justice. you just have to ask yourself sitting back thinking about it, what was that press conference all about yesterday? it was one thing. to light the fuse. light the fuse for impeachment. because these guys are in big trouble. another important point. >> sean: wait a minute, he had to clarify about that joint statement. what does that mean? >> well, that was barr actually being a grown-up and had to remind mueller, we have you on the record three different times saying that you were -- you didn't have enough information to indict on obstruction. it had not to do with the position of the office of legal counsel. but there is another important point that i think people should remember about, and i think that you have comey with diarrhea of the mouth in the post.

he a supposedly new about the dirt on clinton. yes, the professor. he called them a russian asset. remember, in the mueller dossier, mueller stopped short of calling him a russian asset. the former fbi director who started this investigation can't even get full communication with the mueller dossier people. just to finish up and put a final point on this, you were just talking about this in your monologue, wiseman and another attorney there, handled the steele dossier in august of 2016. are you kidding me? these are high-level people. bruce ohr, andrew weissmann, and other people who worked on the former dossier team come up they are looking at this very salacious and unverified information and not one of them sits there and says, where does this come from, bruce ohr? where did this come from?

oh, my wife is doing it. my wife is working for fusion dps working for the democrats and clinton campaign. that was a whole thing. it's so serious but you want to laugh. but at the same time you hope that justice is actually served for these criminals. >> sean: if you listen to the attorney general when he went before senator graham's committee, is he interested wanting to get to the bottom of the fisa abuse? we know that bruce ohr behind closed doors testified, he warned everybody that hillary paid for it, steele hates trump. ten days before, a state department official catherine before comey signed off, says verified but an unverifiable document, but steele doesn't stand by his own words. are those people going to be held accountable? do you see any way they get out

of what i would think is an indictment to commit fraud and a fisa court, an indictment to literally rig an investigation in their favorite candidate and hillary clinton, and to use russian lies to take down a duly elected president? can they get away with that? >> well, i think the easiest thing to prosecute on are the leaks, the light, and obstructing congresses investigation. what i will say in closing, if you look at what has happened in this whole investigation, you've got a lot of areas for the justice of the apartment to look at. do not forget the state department. the dirty cops in the state department and whoever from the clinton campaign working with the dirty cop to get information from russia. >> sean: would it be fair to say that when the american people have seen what you have seen, it will shock the conscience and soul of this country? >> i always say, on the fisa application especially, you

heard comey call it a mosaic. people need to see what's there. i think that they would cringe if they knew what the government was willing to do to its citizens. >> sean: thank you, and congressmen. we appreciate it. when we come back, the president's attorney rudy giuliani live in the studio later paid by the way, lawrence jones hits the streets in portland. a first hand look at the city's homeless crisis. hitting every liberal city in the country. straightaway. calling all sunscreen haters. you're gonna love this. new coppertone sport clear. not thick, not hot, not messy, just clear, cool, protected. coppertone sport clear. proven to protect. with a lot of other young couples. then we noticed something...strange.

oh, could you, uh, make me a burger? -poof -- you're a burger. [ laughter ] -everyone acts like their parents. -you have a tattoo. -yes. -fun. do you not work? -so, what kind of mower you got, seth? -i don't know. some kid comes over. we pay him to do it. -but it's not all bad. someone even showed us how we can save money by bundling home and auto with progressive. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. but we can protect your home and auto.

>> you don't think they committed treason? >> is a legal matter. think of what you have concerns about how they conducted the investigation? >> sometimes people can convince themselves that what they are doing is in the higher interest, the better good. they don't realize what they are

doing is really antithetical to the democratic system that we have. >> sean: that's the attorney general william barr discussing the actions of the doj officials who launch this russia probe. as we are telling you, there are serious repercussions for those for those nefarious, deep state, upper echelon actors -- by the way, not rank-and-file. just this morning, family watergate journalist bob woodward poured cold water on the hopes and dreams of impeachment. watch this. >> i hate to go back to watergate, but you have those thousands of hours of tape recordings where you heard the president say, let's obstruct justice. let's pay black meal money. let's stonewall the jury for that raise the bar on how you deal with the president. and at this point, we do not have that kind of evidence involving trump. >> sean: as a matter of fact, you have zero evidence.

joining us from a former new york city mayor and the president's attorney rudy giuliani. mr. mayor, good to see you. mueller made this big splash yesterday. everybody ignores that he had to clarify and everything he said in that night and a half minute period was not true. in terms of i couldn't look at it because of justice department policy. he said commit to numerous people on numerous occasions that was not the consideration. >> he actually read that in the report. he said, i cannot include obstruction of justice. end of story. that's when injustice stops. this whole thing about it, i can't exonerate him, it's made up by these completely perverted prosecutors who somehow want donald trump to prove his innocence. he actually can, in many cases. but he's not required to prove your innocence, because you cannot prove a negative. they have completely reversed

american law and the media lets them get away with it. you want to answer why they didn't cover the retraction which basically says things like that? because they are dishonest. they are corrupt and the president is actually right. the people who do that are the enemies of the people because what they are doing is they are perpetuating a complete lie. it's the reason why they won't cover -- donald trump jr. got 1.5 million from the chinese, do you not think we'd go crazy? >> sean: in this case, joe biden the father? >> $1.5 billion from china for a start a private equity fund while the old man was giving us away to china. he flew the kid there. >> sean: he had no background in that field. >> he got tossed out of the military for being a drug addict and the given 1.5 billion because of his expertise? that they give it to him because what they did to the islands,

tariffs, sold us out to give the kid 1.5 billion? they are not covering that? you tell me these people are honest? they are figuring out if donald trump got a parking ticket 20 years ago and they do not cover 1.5? what about 5 million from one of the most wicked people in ukraine while joe was doling out money to ukraine. >> sean: he says, you have six hours, fired the prosecutor that's investigating his son, or i'm leaving with america's money. >> the money that would have the country go under. remember, it was not just 1.2 billion. they were going to default without that 1.2 billion. they were desperate. didn't want to fire the guy. he's the godfather of the guys kid. he did it because he was extorted. that's the crime, joe. extorted beard by the way, when he took the money from ukraine, we call that, under all laws, bribery.

bribery? not to sound ridiculous where there is no underlying crime, here we've got the money, we've got the pressure, we've got the result, you've got the official action offering money or withholding money for an official action, the classical common-law crime of bribery. and the dishonest press will not cover it. that's why when the president says they are dishonest? when he says they are corrupt, and says they are the enemy of the people. they are proving it. >> sean: they have lied repeatedly, knowingly, purposely for two years. you said this about mueller. i dare mueller mueller to testify. when did he hire the team, when did he know there is no collusion, why did he ignore the dirty russian dossier. i have a lot of questions for him. >> i watched him yesterday for nine minutes. i saw a man read -- he didn't

give a statement, he read a statement haltingly with a little stumbling. went out without answering questions, the press just live for that. i member they didn't let me go answering questions and i've never been afraid to answer questions because i'm not deceiving you and i'm not afraid of you because i'm not deceiving you. i met with that guy once. once. >> sean: that's it. >> every time i had a problem, somebody else met him. once, we had a crisis and we took him to task in the attorney general's office, the deputy attorney general's office, and i blasted him. he showed up. i saw him a year and a half ago. one and only time. i called him "the wizard of oz"" i would say, you are doing this, you are doing that. i opened him up. i used to sometimes say, maybe we should link him. >> sean: mr. mayor, you outlined hillary clinton. we know she's guilty. espionage act, intent, the underlying crime was espionage act. she was eliminating the evidence

with bleach and hammers. >> we need to start doing new things about it. we have all sorts of new things about it but i find out from my work in ukraine that the clinton foundation got hundreds of millions from crooked uric ukrainian oligarchs. they are pretty tough guys. >> sean: do you believe these people that abuse their power, that use the dirty dossier, that rigged the investigation, that tried to steal an election, and undermine a duly elected president, are you confident they'll be held accountable? >> i'm absolutely confident. ukraine is one piece of that. it's bigger than that. this thing with the steele dossier? dynamite. i don't see how comey walks away from it. i would love to prosecute the case. i'd love to cross examine one of these guys. man... it would be a dream. >> sean: thank you. good job, by the way.

when we come back, the president taking a huge stand when it comes to illegal immigration. geraldo, dan bongino next. lawrence jones has an exclusive report. another liberal city. another crisis beard will explain straight ahead. because i can still make my own insulin. and trulicity activates my body to release it like it's supposed to. trulicity is for people with type 2 diabetes. it's not insulin. i take it once a week. it starts acting in my body from the first dose. trulicity isn't for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you're allergic to it, you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have an allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, belly pain

and decreased appetite, which lead to dehydration and may worsen kidney problems. i have it within me to lower my a1c. ask your doctor about trulicity. why didn't you book your on a travel site?on at hilton.com, i get the price match guarantee. and i can choose from their 14 different hotel brands, so i get the right hotel for every member of my family. like a doubletree for my cousins who love their warm chocolate chip cookies. a homewood suites for my uncle who likes a long stay. a hampton for my sister and her kids. that's a lot of syrup and the waldorf astoria beverly hills for me. but i thought your family vacation was in miami? it is. i hear they're having a great time. book at hilton.com and get the hilton price match guarantee. if you find a lower rate, we match it and give you 25% off that stay.

i'm so hungry. (photographers) look here!hers) candace! charlie! candace, starkist creations come in over 20 flavors-- right: chicken, salmon, or tuna like my favorite! just tear, eat... mmm-- and go! starkist tuna, chicken, and salmon creations. bravo! car vending machines and buying a car 100% online.vented now we've created a brand new way for you to sell your car. whether it's a year old or a few years old, we want to buy your car. so go to carvana and enter your license plate, answer a few questions, and our techno-wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds. when you're ready, we'll come to you, pay you on the spot, and pick up your car. that's it. so ditch the old way of selling your car, and say hello to the new way-- at carvana.

i felt completely helpless. trashed online, my entire career and business were in jeopardy. i called reputation defender. they were able to restore my good name. if you're under attack, i recommend calling reputation defender. and consider joining their groundbreaking campaign

to give every american the right to remove old, inaccurate search results by going to righttobeforgotten.org. if you have search results that are wrong or unfair, call reputation defender at 1-877-866-8555. this is important because mexico has power and are not helping u us. >> making it very clear that if congress doesn't act, he taking matters in his own hands, the trump administration just announced beginning june 10th, the u.s. will impose a 5% tariff

on all goods imported from mexico. that tariffs won't be removed until the mexican government takes dramatic action to reduce or eliminate illegal immigrants crossing the border. this is not being framed as a trade battle but rather an immigration battle and the advisory says if mexico does not act fast, the terrace will continue to rise until they hit 25% on october 1st. some critics believe this could undermine the passage of u.s.-mexico-canada trade agreement. the move comes a day after 1,000 illegal immigrants were apprehended by border patrol agents in el paso. that's the largest single apprehension of migrants ever. the group include people from l guatemala, el salvador, and honduras. borders border patrol agents cannot patrol the border because they are feeding and caring for those families. >> sean: trace gallagher,

thank you with that report. with a reaction with all the breaking news, fox news contributor dan bongino. fox news correspondent at large geraldo rivera. it's really simple. mexico, up until fairly recently, had the most draconian laws about illegal immigrants from central american. you either went to jail or they deported you. there was no in between. now, they are letting the caravans come up here. they have a responsibility. if they want to be our partners to stop it on their end and they are not. >> i don't know, i'm not an expert enough on the economics of the tariff, whether that's in a punitive measure you employ to get mexico to cooperate. but i think what is clear, sean. you know, i'm all for compassion and i believe immigration is a net positive for the country. but i think no one can look at these pictures of a thousand and one in a single day in a single hour crossing the border and feel that inaction is an option.

so we have to do something. >> sean: of those thousands of people, there is one that comes in with bad intentions, that we do not vest, we are not serving the american people well. it's that simple. we have a right to vet and the right to demand that if you are coming here, you have to be able to take care of yourself. >> my feeling is that those kinds of economic issues generally tend to work themselves out. if you have 11 million undocked many people, and while some bad actor does some bad things, what if it's a city of 11 million? you would expect something like that. the thing that i emphasize, and one of my missions in life and you know that i have several, is to portray this group as the positive traditional force, one a compactor >> sean: do you want a wall with a door? >> yes. >> sean: be a part of our

family and treat us with respect. dan bongino? >> yeah, sean. here's what i don't understand. treat them with respect? we've taken millions of immigrants from all over the world who decided to come here legally, raise the right hand, follow the rules, pledge allegiance to the united states, and thank god for those people. but, geraldo, compassion is not a public policy! you cannot just say that and magically wave a wand and make these problems go away. we are compassionate. that is not a accurate thing to say -- "we need to be compassionate," one, it doesn't solve anything, two, it doesn't take into account the context of the entire immigration picture of the country want right now. if you disregard the process, you can come here. that's as simple as that. >> sean: we go to robert mueller yesterday and the clarification. the media breathless, hysteria. oh, we get to relive our

conspiracy for one more day. by the clarification is massive. which is he had said on numerous occasions to numerous people that this justice department policy had no sway in the decision, that there was no evidence, the deputy attorney general, attorney general, the office of legal counsel made this decision. that's what this calls for. >> the first thing i thought of if he had picked william barr to be his original attorney general rather than senator jeff sessions, the president would've had a tenth of the problems he had. >> sean: he wouldn't had any of this garbage. >> barr is a matter of fact, disciplined in his approach, his grasp of the laws, regulation, and the record is so spot on that he really help them. >> sean: dan? >> what he did yesterday, mueller, sean, is disgraceful. i can't believe how other

networks are giving him a pass. >> sean: they peddle lies and conspiracies every second, every minute, every hour of every day! that's all they do. >> it so transparently obvious what he did. not not guilty is not a standard to impugn someone's character in a press conference where you spend the first five minutes of a nine minute press conference saying how russians you went after, this literally happened, are entitled to the presumption of innocence, you go and relitigate a case against the president? you are never as a prosecutor willing to try and didn't have the guts to try? it's an abomination of justice. how do we, even the biggest trump haters in the world, not see that? >> sean: great golf tournament, by the way. he raises a lot of money every year. he has transformed how this country treats those that have mental health issues.

when we come back, we have a report. another liberal city, all the spending, all the generosity of the liberals in a major crisis. pam bondi, emily compagno coming up straight ahead. feel the clarity of non-drowsy claritin and relief from symptoms caused by over 200 indoor and outdoor allergens. like those from buddy. because stuffed animals are clearly no substitute for real ones. feel the clarity. and live claritin clear.

jushis local miracle ear t at helped andrew hear more of the joy in her voice. just one hearing test is all it took for him to hear more of her laugh... and less of the background noise around him. for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter.

just one free hearing test could help you hear more... laughter...music...life... call now for your free hearing test from an industry leader: miracle-ear.

when it comes to reducing the evsugar in your family's diet,m. coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best.

more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar. balanceus.org >> sean: tonight, any report. liberal cities are in crisis. we sent our own lawrence jones to investigate what's going on in that city, just like san francisco, just like l.a., and just like ocasio-cortez's district. take a look. >> portland. it seems like there may be a homeless problem? >> may be is a little bit of an understatement. but yeah. >> this enforcement is really

bad. police aren't able to do their jobs. >> what do you think? >> what do i see? i see a city not doing enough. i see the entire west coast not doing enough. if you've been to the bay area, it's worse. here it's pretty bad. >> people are being allowed to do whatever they want. the people who live in the city are victims. >> i see the sea more congested with tans, people, getting around corners. it's changed the way, an individual woman, where i might feel the line to be more thoughtful. >> i see a lot of drug -- a lot of homeless guys asked me if i wanted some drugs. >> what kind of drugs do you see most homeless people in portland associate with? >> meth and heroin. >> you find a lot of needles. you see a lot of interactions happening on the streets. >> it's easy to be home was down there. it's easy to do it. i sometimes feel like -- i look homeless right now because i just got off the streets like to go weeks ago. it was really just getting up

and doing it for myself. a lot of people don't want to do that. >> sean: joining us with the reaction, fox news contributor emily coming out now and former florida attorney general pam bondi. it's interesting. when you go to settings for cisco san francisco, a mile from the beautiful gated wall of nancy pelosi and a mild to the district from her office, you have people -- feces all over the street, needles everywhere, homelessness everywhere. why wouldn't she, a multi-multimillionaire ask your millionaire friends to pay the bill for shelter? >> exactly. she's behind her gated community. that she's against for our country. but behind her gated community. so no. you know, sean, her kids, kids are going to get hurt. she has to know that with hypodermic needles, the drug issues, the homelessness. >> sean: the kid who slid into second base and slid into a needle? >> it's unreal.

these poor people have mental health issues, they take drugs, they need mental health counseling, drug treatment for chi and all her rich friends can build shelters instead of putting bathrooms to keep the feces off the streets. >> how about a shelter that has bathroom showers, two meals daily. >> a true shelter. exactly. they need drug treatment, mental health. the city of oregon, the mayor gave $32 million in his budget towards this bid that's where it needs to go for but not just setting bathrooms on the street were kids -- you know, people with mental health issues can be dangerous to children. >> sean: emily, i always say this. liberals are very generous with our money. but when it comes to their own money, it's a mile away from nancy pelosi's house and office and the other direction, and it's always happening in these big cities. where is the compassion they

lecture us about when they want every penny we may? >> exactly. the irony is that the war over this competing passionate approach to the homelessness problem means that it's paralyzing these cities, right? it's wasting our tax dollars. for example, seattle spends $100,000 for each of its 12,000 homeless. the city of portland is now allocating 32 million to 15 million, two years ago, that's where it is. police were discouraged of making arrests of any homeless crime. the when a self a self detonated socialist, by the way, brought up mental health and said utilization, he was called a " nazi." the sufferers are not only those homeless, those who are drug addicted and mentally ill, the constituents whose tax dollars are being wasted and unable to

use their parks. >> sean: get your thoughts on what we now see happening with robert mueller yesterday and the clarification, because he outright lied in the nine and a half minutes. >> i'm so glad you asked me that. there was no collusion, there was no crime. had there been, he would've put it in his report. you know that, i know that, the president knows that, rudy giuliani knows that, and the american people know that. for him to come out and say at this point was really politicizing everything. >> sean: good to see you. thank you for being with us. thank you as always. when we come back, more "hannity" right after this.

>> sean: we literally now days away, because the attorney general barr said the inspector general any day and i will be in effect releasing the investigation for fisa abuse. when we get to the truth, it'll be devastating.

we must hold these people and countable. they rigged an investigation, try to rig an investigation will never be the media mob. thank you for being with us. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham? >> laura: >> laura: hannity, they are now trying to abolish the electoral college because if you cannot beat trump with the current system, you have to chae whole system but you can't actually appeal to people in middle america. you have to sideline them, which i'm going to talk about tonight. >> sean: don't you agree with me, don't you want robert mueller to testify? i would love to write the questions. let me ask him the questions. >> laura: i think the senate intel committee should bring you up there for a few questions. >> sean: wouldn't you also like the fact that these people now have to answer for the dirty dossier? that would be important with the lies