atm, remains popular today even in the united states. i think i might hit want to buy my lunch. how about you, benjamin? [laughs] >> benjamin: in britain, that's a perfect example. the only those. >> sandra: we will see you tomorrow, benjamin. "outnumbered" starts now. >> harris: this fox news alert as we are awaiting an update now from police on that missing utah college student, mackenzie lueck. she is 23 years old, a senior, and was last seen early on the morning of june 17th. police say she arrived at salt lake city international airport at around 1:30 in the morning, texted her mother, said she was landed safely, and was taken to a park by a lyft driver. that driver now cleared of anything. there was another car waiting, other person. we will bring you the latest from that news conference as soon as it starts. and this is developing at this hour, the supreme court has ended its session with a bang that will resound in 2020 and

beyond, no doubt. two major decisions today. a 5-4 ruling that federal courts have no role in policing partisan electoral redistricting, also known as "gerrymandering." in a unanimous decision, the high court also blocked, for now, the trump administration's bid to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, saying its explanation for adding the question is insufficient. you are watching "outnumbered." i'm harris faulkner. here today, melissa francis. "fox nation" host and author, tomi lahren. syndicated radio host and fox news contributor, leslie marshall. and in the center seat, "how" political editor, fox news radio host, guy benson. he's "outnumbered." part deux! i feel like it is because i read all your stuff last night. >> guy: at townhall.com, i appreciate it. >> harris: part two in person to talk about it. i can't wait to hear what's

going on. >> guy: so much to discuss especially looking at last night. 20 people on the stage. between the five of us, and -- >> harris: try to get your 6 minutes this hour! [laughter] >> guy: good luck! >> harris: and i understand that conferences starting in utah, missing college student mackenzie lueck, the latest. let's watch together. >> i want to say that no arrests have been made. however, the owner of the residence where we served the warrant last night is a person of interest. our detectives collected multiple items of evidence throughout the night. they are in the process of being tested and analyzed. this will take some time. last night several people made us aware of a mattress and box spring that were given away from the residence at 547 north 1,000 west in fair park

we ask that those who took those mattresses or box springs to please contact the salt lake city police department at 801-799-3000. we would really appreciate your help, if you pick those up, to please let us know. like christie said, it's always been the policy and direction of the selleck city police department to be open and transparent. this is an active and ongoing investigation. we are trying to balance the integrity of this investigation with what you put out to the public. but we want to reiterate that we need the help of the public in this case. i want to thank the hours and hours of work that have been put in by our officers. tireless hours, 24/7. we have been going and running hard from the moment we were contacted on thursday last week.

thank you to the officers, the women and men, and the civilians of the salt lake city police department. they have done a great job. i also want to say that during the last couple days i have spoken with greg lueck, and i can tell you... i can feel the heartache and the pain and the suffering in his voice as we spoke. in my commitment to greg was that we would do everything with within our power at the salt lake city police department to bring mackenzie home. that is our charge and that is what we are committed to do. i can now take a few questions. >> reporter: are the homeowners free at this time? >> yes. >> reporter: are they cooperating? >> he has spoken to our detectives. to that extent, i'm not sure. >> reporter: in regards to the mattress, did he give this

matter as a way? how did this come about? >> we are not sure how or who. we just know there was a mattress and a box spring that were given away last week. >> reporter: did she live in north salt lake at the apartment? >> that, i'm not sure. >> we are not identifying him rt now. >> reporter: was at the same car you were looking for at hatch park? >> that, i do not know. that's part of the investigatio investigation. [indistinct question] as part of this investigation, they are part of the team. they were there with us last night. but as far as the extent of their activity, it's still part of the investigation and we won't release that right now. >> reporter: unless you have

some body or human remains. >> that's not always true. again, that is still part of the investigation. >> [indistinct question] >> that came through the investigation of our detectives, with information that was secured in the warrant. that we are not revealing at this time. >> [indistinct question] >> we are looking into those leads but we are not sure how it plays into the investigation. >> reporter: do you believe the homeowner is the person she met at the park? >> that, we don't know. that, i'm not sure. i'm sure the investigators have looked into all those leads right now. >> reporter: have you been able to confirm that there was any type of remains or anything found in the backyard when it was dug up? >> no, we are not releasing that information right now.

>> reporter: early on with her being an adult, invasion of privacy, did any of those lead to any connections between the homeowner and mackenzie? >> say that again? >> reporter: warrants that you apparently got earlier in the week. you can't go searching hundred private business because she's an adult. but it sounds like you got some of those words earlier this wee. do they have any connection between these two people? >> that right now we don't know, but we do know through the investigation, this is a digital forensic investigation. this is computers, cell phones, ip addresses, urls, texting apps. this is very complicated and it has a digital footprint that our investigators have been following since last thursday. >> reporter: you can't say whether they had a connection prior? >> right, not right now.

sorry. >> reporter: are you worried about mackenzie? are you concerned for her safety? that she may have been taken unwillingly? >> of course i am. i absolutely am. as would any parent, if they had not heard from their son or daughter in the last week. absolutely. too many questions. >> [indistinct question] >> we are not revealing that right now. >> reporter: on her instagram account it appears her account may have followed another account. is that part of the investigation? is that something that tipped you off toward the south's? >> absolutely. all those things you are seeing, we are looking at in great detail. yes, those things are all playing a part in this investigation. >> reporter: is that what led you to that house? >> we are not confirming what led us to that, other than good detective work and the forensic digital footprint we are

following. >> we are going to take one more question. >> [indistinct question] >> it's a missing persons investigation. thank you very much. >> we will stay in the area to answer any of your clarifying questions, and just encourage you to stay in touch -- >> harris: you just heard authorities in utah say that this is still a missing persons investigation, but there were some startling details in all of that. not the least of which was warrants have been served. no one arrested. but police have been made aware by several people in the area of this home where they have gone, that a mattress and box spring were given away last week. they were digging up the backyard and have, as melissa and i were talking about, tented that. some excavation going on at that home. that was earlier today, reported.

but the homeowner of that is sometimes airbnb is who they've been talking with. and authorities just in saying, "is that homeowner cooperating?" and he said, "he has spoken with detectives." that's as far as he can say. that's not exactly a "yes" or you know but there's a lot going on with this case. where is 23-year-old mackenzie lueck today? we are all over the story, as the news continues to break on it we will bring you the very latest. let's move now to another top story today, as i mentioned off the top of the show. the supreme court, on the final day of its current session, with two rulings likely to shape american politics up until and including and beyond 2020. chief legal correspondent and fox news at night anchor shannon bream's life for us in miami. a big day, shannon. >> harris, this final day of the supreme court, these are the two big cases we were waiting on. people on both sides are celebrating today. let's talk through them and

start with that case about whether or not a question about citizenship could be added to the 2020 census. the initiation has argued that it was well within its authority and power to do that. secretary ross over at the commerce department had done it early on, sought to do that in his ten years, to get this question added. today the court made a nondecision. they said there was questions about how they got to that decision, and because of that they had questions about the animus or the motive, how this thing came together, so they sent it back to a lower court, making it unlikely that this logistically will be processed and done and a decision made well after the government says it needs to have these questions answered so it can add it or not at it and get the census forms printed. i'm going to retreat from some of the majority opinion written by the chief justice john roberts. he said, "we do not hold that the agent's decision was absolutely invalid, but agencies must pursue their goals reasonably. recent decision-making under the law calls for an expedition for agency action, what was provided here was more of a distraction."

what he's referring to and what they talk about the in don aiken he pending this with a talk about the dave arguments that are in court. there's a lot of back-and-forth about how secretary ross got to this decision. they said it seemed he was on affect my i mission going to dhs, probing them to provide informational questions that would then force him to say, "well, we need to find this information, i've got at the question." there are others who think he was well within his rights ask those questions in the court should have never gone to the rest of the analysis. justice alito wrote something, he wasn't on board with the decision. "that's a sign of our time that the inclusion of a question about citizenship on the census has become a subject of bitter public controversy and has led to today's regrettable decision. while a decision to place such a question on the 2020 census questionnaire is attacked as racist, there's a broad consensus that inquiring about citizenship is not just appropriate but advisable." the bottom line is essentially that it will be on those forms

if they go to print in july as the government has said they needed to do. he mentioned also the gerrymandering decision, essentially the court saying that when the particular partisan districts that benefit their particular party and help them to win at congressional elections, the court said it would not get involved in that. it's a state matter. they are not the one to handle it, either the states do it or congress does it. justice kagan saying, "we get involved in things all the time the people don't think we should have, and we drop the ball here today." they think they should have. the folks on all sides claims of victory today. and they are certain to have electoral impact in elections moving forward. harris? >> harris: shannon, great to see you. thank you for setting us up for a good conversation. guy benson, you heard her saying justice alito says it's a sign of our times, this has become a bitter public conversation. >> guy: i agree with judge alito's reasoning there, and that portion that you read. to me it's mystifying that it's a huge controversy that we would ask on the census forms, "who

are the people who are living in this country who are citizens of our country?" is returned to abortion, for example, or have the larger picture of who lives in the state legally to have representation. how many seats they get. >> harris: is this as much politics as anything else? a >> guy: so was the gerrymandering case. both parties look at what's in their immediate interest and advantage and they come down with their legal position. >> melissa: nancy pelosi said exactly that. she said she wants to make sure people are counted for representation in the house, whether they are citizens or no not. if you don't pay taxes and you are not a citizen, you are entitled to representation in the house of representatives? >> leslie: it goes beyond representation politically. you are looking at -- >> melissa: i'm not seeing that specific question.

she said, it was for representation in the house. that's what she said. that's what i'm saying -- because i understand the money issue, that's different. do you really feel like you get to have representation in the house of representatives if you are here illegally and you are not paying taxes and you are not a citizen and you broke the law? >> leslie: it's questionable as to whether they are paying taxes. a lot of these corporations that hire them pay taxes for them, put down social security numbers, blanket it in other ways. honestly, yes, i think they deserve representation because they are represented representf our nation. they are over 11 million people. they are part of the fabric of our nation and our economy, so they have to be counted even if they don't have that status. until our congress can figure out how to fix that, we can't deny that they exist. >> harris: tomi had a response. go ahead. >> tomi: i think a very good people should be able to know how many illegal immigrants are living in our country pretty mention the resources that they use, police force, infrastructure, public

transportation, we as american citizens also deserve to know how many are using those resources. >> harris: a follow-up to you, tomi. do you think people will answer that question on the census? before you answer, you should know that if they don't answer it, it's fine. if a lie, it's breaking the law. >> tomi: i think that's why the democrats are so concerned. people will not answer it, therefore they will not be counted, therefore they won't get the representation, they won't get the seats. so that's why democrats are really panicking over adding this question. i don't know whether they will or won't, quite honestly. i think illegal immigrants have been very comfortable in this country, especially for the last two years. i think they would even happily mark that they are not citizens. i think it's almost become a badge of honor because of the democrats. but i think american people deserve to know who is living in our country illegally. >> melissa: i disagree with that, whether the question is on there or not, i think if you are here illegally and you are afraid you wouldn't answer the census no matter what. somebody from the government comes and knocks on her door and is going to ask you questions? i don't think that answer the

door. >> tomi: they don't get drivers licenses in my state, they're fine with doing that. >> guy: take a sit back -- is it unreasonable at aa sovereign government of a sovereign country, counting the people inside that country every ten years, to ask everyone on the form, "are you a citizen? yes or no?" that should be almost question number one. they are not going to punish anyone if the answer is no. we are trying to get the best number possible. >> harris: they won't punish anybody if they skip the answer. >> guy: it such an absurd -- >> harris: if the answer is, "you are here illegally," and you say you are not, that's a problem. that's a concern, people are frightened by this. people i've interviewed, that they don't even know that all they can do is skip it. but some may tell the truth about that. maybe it would accomplish what you're talking about. i don't know. >> leslie: if somebody is a resident alien cometh of a green card, they're not a citizen. if somebody is here illegally, they're not a citizen. >> guy: they can just check

"noncitizen." there's not a box that says illegal immigrants. >> leslie: i feel we need to have a head count. >> harris: is this the first time you've seen something like this? >> leslie: the motive behind it. to quote justice roberts, he said in his -- what he said is that it was contrived. the explanation. that is, for many of us on the left, the problem is the motivation behind it. >> harris: these questions have been asked before, just real quickly. >> guy: that's right. maybe declination is contrived, maybe they can come up with a new one. sweetie we know the motivation on this. >> guy: i just don't understand -- whether the explanation is contrived or not, the question itself, "are you a citizen, yes or no?" is 100% legitimate for government to ask of its people in the census. >> leslie: it's going to have ramifications. extremely negative ramifications, not just for our state, california, but for the nation. not to have an exact head count. there will be people who don't answer it. even people who are here illegally, like i said if they

are resident aliens and hold a green card. >> melissa: is disingenuous to say we don't know everyone's motivation. nancy pelosi made hers clear. she wants illegal immigrants counted because he gives her more people in her state. people on the right are asking it because they want to know who's here illegally so they can make it as well. if we're honest with ourselves, we know everyone's real motivation on this. >> harris: we will move on now. the house and senate doing bills is the crisis is intensifying. will they be able to reconcile the measures ahead of the july 4th recess? what happens if they cannot? plus, democratic presidential hopefuls facing off in their first debate. who broke out of the packet, and who just broke? the situation for themselves, next. ♪ myaspirin regimen, and i just didn't listen. until i almost lost my life. my doctors again ordered me to take aspirin, and i do. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. listen to the doctor. take it seriously. hey, who are you?

oh, hey jeff, i'm a car thief... what?! i'm here to steal your car because, well, that's my job. what? what?? what?! (laughing) what?? what?! what?! [crash] what?! haha, it happens. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, paying for this could feel like getting robbed twice. so get allstate... and be better protected from mayhem... like me. ♪ eh, not enough fiber... chocolate would be good... snacking should be sweet and simple. the delicious taste of glucerna gives you the sweetness you crave while helping you manage your blood sugar. glucerna. everyday progress

♪ so chantix can help you quit slow turkey.rkey. along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting. chantix reduces the urge so when the day arrives,

you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking, or life-threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. quit smoking slow turkey. talk to your doctor about chantix.

♪

>> melissa: 2020 democrats looking for their breakout moment in their first presidential debate last night, and other questions over whether there were any game changers as the race for the white house gets underway in earnest. ten candidates taking the stage in miami, calling for massive government spending and referring this election is a fight for the direction of their party and the country. among the proposals they touted, raising the minimum wage, lessening restrictions on abortion, and comprehensive immigration reform. watch. >> i want to make it clear, this is supposed to be the party of working people. this democratic party has to be strong and bold and progressive. >> i know how to create jobs. we need a short-term strategy to put money in the pockets of workers, and then we need to have a long-term strategy to make sure this country's competitive and we are creating jobs everywhere in this country. >> i've had family members that have to unbolt a machine from the factory floor, put in a box,

and ship it to china. my area where i come from in northeast ohio, this issue we are talking about here -- it's been going on 40 years. >> health care is not just human right, it should be an american right. i believe the best way to get there is medicare for all. but i have an urgency about this. when i am president of the united states, i'm not going to wait. and i am the only candidate here who has passed a law protecting a women's right to reproductive health and health insurance. and i'm the only candidate who has passed a public option. >> i just want to say there's three women appear who have fought pretty hard for a women's right to choose. >> i think we share the goal of universal health care. >> we now have an america where most people support roe v. wade. we need to make that federal law. >> i would follow that up, and my first hundred days with immigration reform, that would honor asylum claims, put undocumented immigrants, as long as they have been committed a serious crime, on a pathway to citizenship.

>> we would not detain any family fleeing violence. in fact, fleeing the deadliest countries on the face of the planet today. we would rewrite our immigration laws in our own image. free dreamers from any fear of deportation. >> we need to get back into the iran nuclear agreement and we need to negotiate how we can improve it. >> melissa: the candidates challenged each other at times, but they did not directly attack front runner joe biden, referring to him only occasionally. biden will be in the second debate tonight. in the meantime, president trump watching the first debate last night on air force one while adding to the g20 summit and tweeting this one word verdict. "boooooring!" they said last night's debate shows just how far left they have moved. >> this is a homogenous group of socialists, one socialist organism with many heads. that might be a bit of a variety, but it's the same organism. a radical government takeover. whether it's amy klobuchar

wanting to decriminalize border crossings or julian castro, we will take either. >> melissa: joining biden in tonight's second debate is bernie sanders, pete buttigieg, and kamala harris, among others. guy, hat tip to our editors there for making that look interesting, the way they cut it. when i was watching it i was stabbing my leg with a fork to stay awake. i mean, a gong would have helped a lot. wow. did anyone jump out there to yo you? >> guy: i think the conventional wisdom that congealed out of that debate was it was a big opportunity for elizabeth warren. she was probably the only top-tier candidate on that stage, center stage, an opportunity to commend the moment. i don't think she did that. >> melissa: is much as the moderators helped. >> guy: especially early on. she endorsed illuminating private health care for 180 180 million people. she faded from that point forward. some of the younger people in the crop of candidates who i

think probably help themselves raise their profiles a little bit, tulsi gabbard, may be cory booker. >> harris: usa today is reporting that tulsi gabbard was the most searched candidate on google. >> tomi: because no one knows who she was! [laughs] 's be much talked about military and some things, and a couple of the candidates -- >> tomi: she's only when he talked about national security or of any kind. did anyone notice how short the segment on the run was? that was the only national security topic they covered. >> harris: and warren was silent. >> tomi: all night long. none of them had anything to say. of course, none of them on border enforcement. we knew that. but nothing to say on national security, the moderators and give them any questions on national security prayer that was the one. they want to get back into the iran deal. >> melissa: it was reported earlier that julian castro was the one most searched, so i don't know what the difference difference -- >> leslie: over 2000% increase in google searches for his name, just moments after he answered

the first question. i was kind of disappointed, the first question about equal rights and equal pay went to a man. but i thought he handled it. quite frankly, i thought he had has breakout moment last night for people i didn't know him, didn't know where he stood. i thought last night he unseated beto o'rourke as the name in texas. and it was very clear with the interchange between them that beto saw that happening. >> melissa: you really thought beto o'rourke was the name in texas? >> leslie: he was very popular, his popularity has sunk. he sunk last night, and i have to tell you, i can speak spanish -- and i won't, here -- many people in california do come as you know. but when he started to speak spanish and everybody was looking at not just cory booker's face, julian castro, because you think he would speak spanish and is not, but cory booker does. cory booker, beto o'rourke, bad spanish speakers. pretty much like me, grammatically incorrect. but if anybody speaks spanish stomach, they are in trouble because people to judge speaks seven linkages. >> melissa: was that written somewhere that you're supposed

to go out into that connect with everybody do that? >> leslie: it was being broadcast on telemundo, as well. i think that was their idea. two-thirds of the hispanic community, the latino community, identify themselves as democrats. but the latino community i've spoken to -- not just in california but on my radio show, throughout the country, have said that -- "don't pander to us by speaking spanish. pander to us by talking about policy." >> harris: most minor to say that, whether or not it's the language thing. >> guy: i don't speak great spanish, maybe a little better than beto, i don't know. >> harris: i think a lot of those sort of actions to try and get people to say, "hey, i'm speaking our language," it's the same thing when you're african-american and they are trying to pick up certain topics or go to certain restaurants. >> tomi: like hillary did with the hot sauce in her purse? >> harris: whatever it is, it's part of genuinely who you are, i guess you showcase that. i don't know -- what votes do you think you're picking up by

doing that? >> guy: a lot of voters have a b.s. meter over whether it's authentic or a peer pander. i think beto o'rourke looks last night like an empty suit. i think it was a deliberate strategy for castro to come after him hard. it was the only discernible strategy i could see of someone having a game plan, something they wanted to accomplish and i debate. it was castro taking out beto. and beto looked like this kind of flailing mediocrity. it's amazing what can happen when the entire media is not propping you up like they were in texas. >> melissa: i thought it was like he was going to show up on the stage. that he was so nervous. i thought tulsi gabbard had a lot of presence. what you think of how did she did? >> leslie: when it comes to military experience, she has it. she is somebody a lot of people didn't know. i thought she was strong and she held her own, not that she had much time to do that. but she is in the democratic party perceived negatively on certain issues, like lgbtq and some other --

>> harris: how do you think she done that? >> leslie: i think it was a particular answer and not many people bought it. >> harris: the authenticity is what you're looking for. you were disappointed, you wrote about this. what happened with elizabeth warren? >> guy: i think she faded into the background and sort of went away in the second half of the debate. amy klobuchar gave the best closing, in my opinion. that woman sounds like she is making sense and is real and gets it. i want to give a shout out to jay inslee. i don't like any of their politics, but he used his limited time extremely functionally and effectively. he was on message, he seemed at ease, and he went back to his executive experience. >> leslie: democrats, were they looking for last night i would have a looking for tonight? they are looking for he could be on that stage and go up against donald trump. i have to say, if you're looking for that, amy klobuchar did that last night. she had some of those digs. whether it's the bathroom, comment, the more foam than beer in the cup -- >> melissa: i thought that

sounded painful. >> leslie: that's what you're going to get with donald trump, and i agree with you on those with warren. >> melissa: we will look more into the policy issues democrats are touting, and later we are going to take up other issues. we'll be right back. ♪ hawaii?! nice! yeah i'm excited. finally earned enough rewards points. so jealous. yeah i can't wait to get that shave-ice! what's shave-ice? it's like a hawaiian snow-cone. why not just say snow-cone? i don't know, they call it shave-ice. you fly to hawaii for this? i don't go there for the ice. you saved up your rewards points for ice? ...that's a lot of ice. go rewards® credit card from navy federal credit union... our members are the mission.

who used expedia to book the vacation rental that led to the ride ♪ which took them to the place where they discovered that sometimes

a little down time can lift you right up. ♪ flights, hotels, cars, activities, vacation rentals. expedia. everything you need to go. expedia. "burger! i want a sugar cookie! i want a bucket of chicken! i want....." "it's the easiest, because it's the cheesiest" kraft. for the win win.

but how do i know if i'm i'm getting a good deal? i tell truecar my zip and which car i want and truecar shows the range of prices people in my area actually paid for the same car so i know if i'm getting a great price. this is how car buying was always meant to be. this is truecar. what do all these people have in common, limu? [ guttural grunt ] exactly. nothing! they're completely different people. that's why they make customized car insurance from liberty mutual. they'll only pay for what they need.

yes, and they could save a ton. you've done it again, limu. [ limu grunts ] only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ >> harris: the commercial break, we were still talking about the 2020 democrats last night! united in their position, or their opposition to president trump and their mission to defeat him, but split on some issues like gun-control and foreign policy. the candidates also put on the spot over whether they would support the government-run medicare for all program. watch. >> who here would abolish their private health insurance in favor of a government-run plan? just a show of hands as a started off with. [applause] as you just saw, massachusetts senator elizabeth warren a new york city mayor bill de blasio, the only two candidates who raise their

hands when asked if they would eliminate their own private insurance. that was an interesting part of a conversation. >> it was. i would point out the cory booker didn't raise his hand even though he cosponsored the bernie sanders bill that elizabeth warren has as well, which would in fact illuminate private insurance. we can follow up with cory booker on that question at some point. i think it was very significant that is the only top-tier person for now on that stage, warren raised her hand affirmatively on that question. i was puzzling through this early this morning as we were talking about the debate on "fox & friends," and i think if you are an anti-single-payer democrat, like maybe joe biden, you can make the argument what those people like bernie and warren and kemal not want to do, is literally repeal and replace obamacare. if you are the trump campaign you are looking at this and the way you can communicate is numeric and people is that they would literally repeal and replace your private health care coverage, which is 180 million people in this country. the vast majority of whom like it.

>> harris: when amy klobuchar was making her argument about it, she sort of split it. i was trying to figure it out. she doesn't want to necessarily immediately get rid of private health care. what was she doing? >> leslie: i think she was turning to play both sides of the answer to that question. look, i've written about this. you cannot say to millions of americans, "we are going to take away all of your insurance," and that's why democrats are saying, "look, we want choice. there are people who don't have health care insurance and they need it." what i said before is medicare for all isn't a good idea, the government hoping to have everyone ensure it is, but that doesn't and getting rid of the private sector. having people give their insurance on them don't act on mike from their employers can xp when the majority people get from their employers. then the talk on the stage last night on the dais was, what you do those people? he voyager them saved you can keep your doctor. that's what i heard him equally

stressing. she trying to say that you are trying to keep your pretty health insurance? >> leslie: welcome only two of them raised their hands, and she's not one of them. >> melissa: elizabeth warren is one of them and she is surging in the polls. i thought it was interesting she did that, because i think for a lot of americans she disqualified herself. when you say they are going to repeal and replace your health insurance that you get from your employer with medicaid? or what folks are getting at the va. i know people are happy, and some aren't. when you say that, wow. >> harris: medicare. >> melissa: no, i'm sitting medicaid for all. medicare for all doesn't exist, we can't afford it. >> tomi: like the rest of her fellow candidates, she never really explained how she would pay for anything. they always seem to push that off onto the government, a.k.a. the taxpayers and the corporations. we talked about this before, but it's so easy to pass it off onto this faceless, nameless entity. and someone else is going to pay for it. the young people listening to

that i'm sure love listening to elizabeth warren, they will love listening to burn each night because their solution is just that you shouldn't have to pay for this. "the rich people don't deserve their wealth, they should share with you, we should get poorer together." young people seem to gravitate toward that. >> harris: i do give them credit for talking about what people have listed as the number one issue. it's like a rorschach, people look at it -- tomi, as he put it, people can figure what they want. we have part deux tonight. >> tomi: got to stay awake. >> harris: president trump arriving in japan for the g20 summit this morning ahead of high-stakes trade talks this weekend with chinese president xi. can the two largest economies in the world reach a deal? and how do they get there? ♪

can't see what it is yet.re? what is that? that's a blazer? that's a chevy blazer? aww, this is dope. this thing is beautiful. i love the lights. oh man, it's got a mean face on it. it looks like a piece of candy. look at the interior. this is nice. this is my sexy mom car. i would feel like a cool dad.

it's just really chic. i love this thing. it's gorgeous. i would pull up in this in a heartbeat. i want one of these. that is sharp. the all-new chevy blazer. speaks for itself. i don't know who they got to design this but give them a cookie and a star. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.

we're on the move. hey rick, all good? oh yeah, we're good. we're good. terminix. defenders of home.

>> melissa: president trump arriving today in japan for the g20 summit where he will take part in much anticipated trade talks chinese president xi

jinping. there's a lot at stake here. guy, this has gone on for quite some time. it felt like they were making headway, there was a lot of reports this morning about preconditions. larry kudlow came on earlier. he shot down those ideas. were you think are with this? >> guy: your guess is probably better than mine, in fact, melissa. it seems like you in a few weeks ago there was progress being made. that is the word of the white house. i think the hope of atrophic administration, the president, is to get a good deal. i think that would be hughley hy helpful political he. we can put some of these economic uncertainties behind us. if it is true, i know kudlow denied it, but if it is true that they are saying that we are not going to talk about anything until we take the huawei issue off the table and reinstate some of that, i think that's a topic really hurting the chinese. it seems like a pressure point for them. if the president took is a good negotiator, he will put us them on the pressure point. >> melissa: i read an article

in "the wall street journal," tomi, talking about the fact that why this isn't hurting as much is it because it is because there's a lot of cheating going on through vietnam. as usual, the market is finding a way to deal with this. that is that shipping where you send something to vietnam and is moving on to where it's really going, trans-shipping, it's one of those things. to me it's another place where we were told the sky was going to fall, the economy was going to fall apart, this was a disaster, he can't possibly play it this way, and then we are not seeing the huge fallout. >> tomi: whether you're a democrat or republican, never trumper, it doesn't matter. you have to give the president credit with doing something they have not. taking the china issue head on. which he said he was going to do and he's working on it. they are going to be naysayers in a matter what he does but he's over there making progress, moving toward a solution. we as a country should get by him and say, "yes, we need to do with china and get behind our

president to do that." because it's good for the american people. >> melissa: leslie, it's really interesting -- the farmers are the ones who have been retaliated against. the usmca is great for farmers. if nancy pelosi would bring it out for a vote, and other countries involved havarti move forward. i wonder if that's part of a motivation, because the spat with china hurting farmers. they would completely make up for it, if they voted on and it went into effect. she's holding that in the balance. will she bring to the floor? >> leslie: part of her problem with this is with any piece of legislation, that you have the more left of left facet of the democratic party who constantly are saying, "well, look, you don't have enough protection for workers. you don't have enough protection for the environment." and she gets this in a lot of legislation. >> melissa: but it was in the usmc and not enough to. that's what's so amazing, harris. it protected the environment and workers, nafta didn't address that it all. >> harris: i think we know

exactly when the speaker will make her move. she certainly indicated after meeting with justin trudeau, the canadian prime minister, that they had some very productive conversations and it looked like a possibility. i just think we know. we do know about nancy pelosi as she will with until that moment where she can do some of that leveraging with her far left people on issues like impeachment. i think all these things hold together with her. i think it's all leverage points. >> guy: but does she want to give trump a win leading into an election cycle? >> harris: no. but it doesn't have to be about him. it could be about the farmers. you said that's a weak spot for us right now in terms of helping them out. no matter what your subsidies look like, you want to be able to listen. >> tomi: that's with the farmers told president trump and he said they don't want to hand out, they want a level playing field. he's going to give that to them. >> harris: let's see what i use a does. >> melissa: as the crisis continues at the border, the clock is ticking for congress to pass an emergency funding bill. can lawmakers get it done?

that's not asked for musical by re-financing up to 100 percent of your home's value you could take out 50,000 dollars or more. you could use that money to pay credit card debt and other expenses, plan for retirement, and get back on your feet financially. and don't let less than perfect credit hold you back. even if you've been turned down for a va loan by your bank, call newday usa. they've been given automatic authority by the va they can often help veterans when other lenders won't. need money for your family? call newday usa right now and use the va home loan benefit you've earned and deserve. at newday usa veterans can buy a home with no down payment. at newday, your service is your down payment.

that's ensure max protein, fgñi with high protein and 1 gram sugar. it's a sit-up, banana! bend at the waist! i'm tryin'! keep it up. you'll get there. whoa-hoa-hoa! 30 grams of protein, and one gram of sugar. ensure max protein. i was told to begin my aspirin regimen, blem. and i just didn't listen. until i almost lost my life. my doctors again ordered me to take aspirin, and i do. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. listen to the doctor. take it seriously.

>> melissa: the senate overwhelmingly passing its own emergency board of funding bill after rejecting a house version approved on tuesday, the humanitarian crisis at the southern border keeps growing. the competing votes not setting

up a race to try and reconcile the two bills before congress leaves for the fourth of july recess. guy, do you think they get it done? with the best way to do it? the senate that's a really bright it bipartisan bill. it's an overwhelming vote. >> guy: first of all, because this is a crisis and both parties are professing to view it as such, why would congress go on recess? >> melissa: they can't. >> guy: if this is unresolved connect they need to work this out. second question, with the easiest thing to do? it's very simple in this case. mitch mcconnell give a speech on the floor this morning, he's 100% right. it is a bipartisan senate bill that passed with 84 out of 100 votes in the u.s. senate. president trump signed into law, house republicans are ready to support it. a lot of house democrats would vote for it. nancy pelosi is single-handedly holding up this process with a bipartisan solution just sitting there and she will have to answer for that. we will see if the press forces are. >> melissa: there's more work to be done preleft night on tucker's show i issued a pledge

that we could all give to every moniker. if you could give with nothing in return, what you proposed for to get the ball rolling. we have to work together to solve this like this this an acute crisis. why don't we all asked lawmakers that every time you run into them? what would you give with nothing and returned to get the ball rolling? >> leslie: i think it's a good question. one thing is their their time. they shouldn't take time off, i agree 100%. you can't cry about toothpaste and soap and cages and bodies floating in the rio grande and then go on vacation. >> melissa: we will ask on the other side of this break. we will bury it. . with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that.

now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? i've always been amazed and still going for my best, even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin... i want that too. eliquis. eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. what's next? reeling in a nice one. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden sign of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical

or dental procedures. eliquis, the number one cardiologist-prescribed blood thinner. ask your doctor if eliquis is what's next for you.

>> melissa: tomi lahren ticking is by the headlines of the 2016 dallas police shooting that left five officers dead. check out the latest episode of "no interruption with tomi lahren" on fox nation. you can soon get your hands on her new book, "never play dead: how the truth makes you

unstoppable," it's the store shelves next week. promoting all of that -- and i want to ask you because you didn't get to talk in the last quarter -- what was your thoughts on the border discussion? >> tomi: and wondering where the money is for border enforcement. i see lot for humanitarian aid, that's great, but we still need to build a wall. >> melissa: thank you. here's harris. >> harris: we begin with officials saying they have their first person of interest in the case of missing utah college student mackenzie lueck. this is "outnumbered overtime," and harris faulkner. he saw a news conference. we learn that the owner of a home where officers are carrying out a search warrant in an older neighborhood of salt lake city has been named the first person of interest in the disappearance of lueck, who has not been seen or heard from since she took a ride from the airport to a nearby park, met another person there, in the early hours of june 17th. authorities were seen carrying shovels into the