country.ar so we are going to have a studio audience tomorrow night, 9:00 eastern on fox.ea we will never be the destroy-trump-rage-media mob. and not let your heart be troubled, there she is laura ingraham, how are you?tr >> laura: great show tonight we are here in washington, and this is "the ingraham angle" from d.c. tonight. a history lesson how aoc plus three anti-americanism is linked to the radicalism of barack obama. my angle will explain. and something you will only see here. "the ingraham angle" has exclusive details about the ms-13 members arrested per o brutal killings. any information about congresswoman omar's possible sham marriage. also tonight, on how the words of "the squad" will turn off voters. alan dershowitz also on the latest legal battle and ocasio-cortez's new challenger stops by to tell us her plan to

win in 2020. but first, the roots of their rage, that is the focus of tonight's "angle." now all week we have been reporting on the radical agenda and tactics of the democrats newest darlings. aoc plus three. o now unlike others, we take them seriously. because let's face it they have proven themselves to be bold and powerful voices within the democratic party. the 2020 candidates and hill leadership seem absolutely petrified of them. well, tonight, we turn to the roots of the new radical vanguard.al the drab four anti-american race baiting contains the dna of the leftist radicals of yesteryear. and how so? aoc plus three is the natural outgrowth of those who believe that america is a fundamentally evil place. founded by evil white men. now in the past, some of this

anti-american rabble-rousing was largely delegated, relegating to universities. maybe black panther, other radical type of meetings, or dying liberal churches. certainly not the democrat party. but the times, they are a changing. >> and because i am ashamed of it continuing to live in its hypocrisy and i work so hard to make sure that others who have had that american, why don't you be like an american, because it used to be a very positive thing. >> the united states is running concentration camps on our southern border. >> we have yet to enjoy the full measure of freedom as black americans. >> laura: america the beautiful? no, it is america the oppressor.

where have we heard that before? >> he is a friend, and a great leader, giving an extraordinary welcome to my pastor, where's he at? >> no, no, no, not god bless america, god -- in the bible for killing innocent people. for treating citizens as less than human. >> laura: remember him reverend jeremiah wright, he was instrumental in barack obama's awakening. and inspired barack obama's rhetorical style. and the radical aims that many who have written about barack obama believe simmer beneath the cool cat exterior. and the further resistance don't forget obama launched hist political career out of this man's living room. >> at a moment when 6,000 people a week were being murdered by

our government, we committed extreme acts vandalism, we destroyed property, and that is terrorism.e a very noisy screen against genicide. and the terrorists in that time where the people dropping bombs on vietnam. >> laura: remember the merry ban of underground terrorists went on a bombing spree in the 1970s. they were only stopped when a mail bomb exploded in their own faces. with a lot of air coverage from the media, obama ducked and dodged answering any tough questions about his association with the right, but his entire worldview has these roots in the radicals even if the political reality of the day kept him from fully articulating and pursuing them. but that was then, and this is now. today the radicalism has taken on a new urgency, mostly in reaction to the success and enduring power of the

donald trump. president guy, the mainstream them credit party has done everything i think to try to stop trump. they were certain that the deep state or of stormy daniels or bob mueller would stop him but it did not work. and now they hope the endless absurd charge of racism will humble him, but i don't think that will work either, becausele he keeps moving forward. and he draws them out, and for a lot of americans, he deliverss results for the voters across the board, african-americans latino americans, female entrepreneurs, the list goes on and on. and the democrats see all of this and they are freaking out. now enter antifa, the unofficiaa military wing of the radical worldview. [screaming]

while it is not surprising that the domestic terrorists are inspired to blow up i.c.e. when their politicians including aoc and company all but say that the agency itself is hitlerian. >> the fact that concentration camps are now an institutionalized practice in the home of the free is extraordinarily disturbing. and we need to do something about it. >> i am antifa, that note left behind as a manifesto before he stormed a i.c.e. detention center armed with explosives and a rifle. >> laura: recall reverend wright's iconic line.s >> now we are indignant, because of stuff we have done overseas is now brought back into our own front yard.

america's chickens are coming home to roost. >> laura: a couple of yearss later as a university professor in boulder the justice of roosting chickens, arguing the 9/11 attack was justified due to u.s. foreign policy. remember that was the sweetheart professor ward churchill. >> i'm not a judge, i don't make the assessment as to what it is they deserve with the reality if you want to avoid september 11th, if you want security in some actual form then it is almost a biblical framing, you have to do unto others as you would have them do unto you. >> laura: 13 years later we have congressman omar casually dismissing 9/11 and the 3,000 americans who lost their lives.

>> it was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that w some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties. >> laura: in the 1970s radicals rallied around opposition of the vietnam war but today it is immigration both in the radical worldview well demonstrating the inherent evil of the american government. but 50 years ago it was not members of congress, but now they are, and they are prepared to blow up the entire b democratic party to advance their cause. a complete dismantlement of the current economy to establish one where they reward their friends and punish their enemies. the toil and struggle of radicals over decades in theun media and in academia are finally bearing fruit. they are now the new face of the democrat party. and that is "the angle." as i noted last night, the left

lost it completely after trump supporters at a north carolina rally chanted "send her back" in reference to congresswoman yuan omar. >> omar has a history of launching vicious anti-semitic screams. [chanting "send her back"] >> laura: today the president was asked about the chants and the backlash. >> why did you not ask them to stop saying that? >> i think i did. i started speaking very quickly. it really was -- i disagree with it, by the way. it was quite a chant. and i felt a little bit badly about it. >> laura: that still was not enough. it never is. liberals are condemning president trump for something he himself at that rally did not say. >> when has that ever happened ever since george wallace? i'm serious.

this is about dividing and raising the issue of racism across the country, because that is his base.iv a >> i thought of it as something that will be in the history books like a bill connor kind of moment. >> this is all part and parcel of the president's 2020 strategy. no more dog whistles, just naked racism. >> laura: here to debate, 2020 adviser, and democratic strategists monique presley all right, pastor scott, let's start with you, your thoughts on all of this, the president distancing himself from the chant, but the critics said over the weekend he basically said that himself, so why bother distancing himself? >> first of all you stated that the president did not originate that chance, it came up and took him by surprise in the process and he deflected. he did not want to distance himself from his base, however in distancing himself from the chant.

but here we are on the left this fake sensitivity that they have. this president has been attacked, vilified, criticized condemned by every faction of the left. he has been insulted, berated b everything you can do. and he takes it, but they want to have this fake sensitivity. these young ladies, to me they remind me of the movie "mean girls" who they are a click. they act like nancy pelosi is a mean old principal. and to the clique, they want to intimidate and bully anybody and if anybody opposes them, they want to cry racism. and the chant came up, the president distance himself, but he is not going to distance himself from his base. >> right, so we have one president of the united states and i acknowledge that that is donald j. trump. whatever standard we use whether it is for freshman

members of congressman that are not girls, they are grown women. >> laura: nancy pelosi called them girls yesterday. >> i don't care whatat nancy pelosi said about them or what pastor scott says about them.ar what i am saying is that they are women who are electedco officials and they deserve to be spoken of with respect. and i think about president trump in the same way. and this is not that. i hear pastor scott laughing may be because we share knowledge of the same good book. i am an ordained minister, he is pastor. we understand. an eye for an eye thing to do in this administration we seem to have going, but that is not really the way that it is supposed to be done. a leader leads, and then people follow. and what we saw last night was people following the leader. we had tweets over the weekend and they fell right behind those tweets and said send her back. he tried to stop it, but we see the video, he said that he started speaking faster.

no, he waited 13 seconds until the chanting stopped. >> 13 seconds, but who is counting? >> i am counting, and the crowd was counting, because it kept on chanting. and those things just should not happen. i'm not even here to debate whether the president is a racist or not. the record is clear. >> laura: you are saying he is a racist? >> like i said, like i said this fake sensitivity and this fake outrage, y'all need to put that in the can.ge and don't try to bring up the bible. in matthew chapter 23, jesus called his critics snakes vipers, he said they were all going to hell, so let's not act like you are not supposed to answer your critics. he answered the critics. the president is who he is. and he responded the way that hw responded. and you guys initiate. he is a counter puncher. they initiate a part of those

young ladies, i called them girls, they are young enough to be my daughter. but those young ladies have c insulted him even while they were on the campaign trail. they came into office calling him an mfer, so let's not try to act like these are some innocent little dainty little flowers that need to be treated with such respect. they are out here in politics and they are going hard, and when they get slapped back they have a problem with it. >> they don't seem to have a problem. the president is calling them out. he has the biggest bully pulpit in the world and he uses it -- >> and they are using theirs as well. they are using theirs as well.y >> laura: they don't care about being prejudice, they are running the party. >> he is supposed to be running the entire free world. he has all the time in the world. >> respect that. if he is supposed to run thehe entire free world, tell those girls to respect that. they need to respect that. they don't respect him for the

person he is, then they need to respect them for the office he holds. respect the office. >> they respect the office. >> laura: they don't even call them president. >> i'm calling in president next time you talk to him, tell him to respect the office.si >> call on the president. >> laura: okay, i do have an issue. i actually take them seriously. i don't dismiss them as they are people who are going to come and go. i think that they represent a worldview and i take them at their word of what they say and what they want to do, and i am treating them as serious political figures, because i think that they think this democrat party has gone off the rails and they believe that obama in some way did not fulfill the dream, and omar hasa said that in interviews. she thought hope and change was a mirage, she told politico magazine that. so i think they want the democrat party to be something much more activist and much more tilted towards the left. that is obvious.

so if they want to be taken l seriously, okay. but i don't think if you hit them, they can shrink back and say, we are just -- you can't criticize us because we are freshmen or women of color. - you are in the arena. when i take you seriously, then be able to defend your views. people should be respectful when they do it. so i agree with you, monique, on that. >> let me say this, laura, if those young ladies have their way, they would overthrow our entire system of american government. it would be a socialist agenda. >> laura: they would agree that the fundamentals of our system need to completely be upended. there worldview dictates that, i would agree with you. cory booker spoke out, i believe that this was today. important to watch. >> i felt like i was watching when my parents watched in black-and-white, literally the same language of a governor wallace. people who believe that they can use race and bigotry as a sword to try to not only cut down

their political enemies, but also as a sword to advance their political agendas. >> i grew up -- >> laura: hold on one second monique, does aoc and the other three young women, don't they do that too? don't they use charges of racism as a bludgeon with whom they disagree? even with nancy pelosi. >> it's interesting that youou would say that, because we started the program tonight and i thought we were in some sort of time warp, because we are looking at pictures of and video of reverend wright. >> laura: they did not emerge out of nothing. >> why don't we call it us, and you and i have a way where we can sometimes agree and sometimes we disagree, but we can meet and have those conversations. i agree with some of the positions of those four members of congress. i don't agree with others. i don't feel like i am obligated to agree with everything to think that people who are

elected officials deserve respect. >> laura: you don't think they use racism as a bludgeon? >> you don't use racism if there is racism. you are talking about the existence of racism, that means -- >> laura: i five seconds, go ahead. >> it is funny that they would use george wallace and connor because they were a face of the democratic party and the '60s when i was growing up. joe biden probably hung out with george wallace. joe biden's mentor or something because george wallace and bill connor where the face of the democratic party in the '60s during the civil rights struggle, so why would they use them as a reference? that is their foundation, those are their roots. >> laura: we are way over thank you so much for joining us tonight. and who are aoc plus three u really protecting by calling for the abolishment of i.c.e.? we have exclusive details on "the ingraham angle" only here

tonight about the 22 ms-13 gang members that we told you about last night. don't move. need cash?

at newday, veteran homeowners can get $54,000 dollars or more to consolidate high rate credit card debt and lower their payments by $600 every month.

>&c"ajry here, hello! starts with -hi!mple... how can i help? a data plan for everyone. everyone? everyone. let's send to everyone! [ camera clicking ] wifi up there? -ahhh. sure, why not? how'd he get out?! a camera might figure it out. that was easy! glad i could help. at xfinity, we're here to make life simple. easy. awesome. so come ask, shop, discover at your xfinity store today. >> many of them came into the country within the last four years. 19 of the 22 defendants are in the country illegally.

many of the victims are recent immigrants into the country.y. >> laura: last night we told you about the arrest of these ms-13 gang members, their affiliates and the brutalru killings of at least seven people in california. we got our hands on new details. three of the 22 arrested had existing deportation orders meaning they should not have been in the u.s. at all. five of the alleged murder sought asylum within the past few years. a process the left wants to make it easier for those crossing our borders. here now for a "the ingraham angle" exclusive acting u.s. citizenship director. to me it's about as clear cut as we can get.en concrete example of what happens if the left gets its way. it's got its way on asylum reform, stopping at making it

more difficult to deport bad actors out of the united states. >> of course just this week with the department of justice and dhs jointly issued a new asylum regulation and if it holds up it will make a big difference. to your point, laura, congress holds the main keys here and not much of this is very complicated. this doesn't have to be a big deal. we could pass two loophole closures that even president obama supported and i can fit them all on one page.ol it can be bipartisan and everything else. we're not seeing that out of the house. senator graham in the senate is working on some of this. no one in the house. they are waiting to go on vacation. you are right about this group of really vicious ms-13 murderers. i will tell you when i was a state attorney general in

virginia, ms-13 was the worst most violent scourge in virginia. a lot of states would say the same thing. california i assume may well be one of them. ironically enough, these arrests in l.a. where we are also -- >> laura: sanctuary policy. >> wouldn't have turned over these three deportation orders. >> laura: thinking about the domestic terrorists and that's what antifa is, surrounding these i.c.e. facilities. raising the mexican flag, trying to firebomb it as that domestic terrorist did who was killed. do they realize that the people being harbored, many of them have criminal convictions separate from their crossing the border. they've been ordered deported and these individuals would have been gone from the country.. it looks like they came in during the obama years, during

the summer of 2014, 2015, the mad push we were told then that these were families seeking a better life. some of them are.. but not all of them are. one american dead and here's seven american dead and it's a big yawn from the democrats. you don't see aoc plus three talking about the case. >> no, and it's very hard to reconcile, the same cities that scream at i.c.e. for enforcing the law, doing their job, the same ones who harbor these folks, many of whom are just evil and vicious. and yet they continue the same behavior. i don't know why it anyone expects ms-13 members to change. certainly i.c.e. doesn't expect them to change and prioritizes removing them and gets no help from places like los angeles. >> laura: real quick, real quick. real quick. why are we announcing that we are doing raids? i've said this on the show five nights in a row. i don't understand why the administration broadcasts we are

about to do raids.st we know that cities, we get the interactive maps. you get these corrupt ngos giving their how to avoid i.c.e. deportation nonsense. why is that happening? who is leaking that? >> forget ngos. the speaker of the house is out there doing that.>> the chief of police in los angeles is out there doing that. all the while, i.c.e. professionals and i.c.e. are trying to do their job and facing increasing and more specific threats. i it's not just the incident in washington and aurora. they have to contend with it all around the country. they're doing a great job, even with the resistance they are getting from those on the left frankly. it goes on and on. i.c.e. is going to keep going you can count on it. >> laura: stop announcing raids.in just do it as a matter of course because that is what the law requires. thank you so much for being with us tonight. we appreciate it. those who call for smarter immigration laws, they are often

labeled evil or racist or you don't have any compassion. all the usual stuff. that sort of language is used to shutdown political debate demonize. is the american public buying any of it? here to tell us is pollster frank luntz. the aoc plus three crowd, as i i like to call them, they are really the ones playing the game most obscenely. i want to start with one of your classic phrases. let's listen. >> the president is committing human rights abuses at the border, keeping children in cages. >> he can't look all americans in the face and justify why thid country is throwing them in cages. >> if we improve the conditions of children in a cage, they are still in a cage. >> laura: okay, so it's kids in cages.y does that language work with voters? >> actually, laura, it does. it is visual language. it's impactful, memorable.

what they do is they give the presentation. they show a photograph of one of those centers and you've got it right there so when you put that up and you're tied to the language, you just did it, it actually adds credibility to that statement. does the public appreciate this angry, hostile communication? gr. but is it impactful? does it change people's minds? yes, it does. >> laura: what's your evidence for that. people come up to me, and they are like we don't want any problems at the border.le these people came across the border without authorization. most of them have one piece of paper on them with plastic around it and they know where they're going. the cartel told them how to do it or other people along the way told them how to do it. it's terrible. we don't want anyone to suffer but we are overloaded. i don't think americans were struggling every day -- i disagree with you on this and i like to see your data.

people struggling and saying i'm exhausted at the end of the day. i'm working my tail off and i know i'm going to have to spend the money on a million people coming across the border illegally. people are enraged by this. i don't think they're leaning towards the aoc plus three worldview. >> you know what, that's thehi reason why some people voted for house democrats in 2018. after immigration was the issue for two months. they talked about what was happening at the border and republicans lost 40 seats in the house. there's a better way for the g.o.p. to be communicating.te secure the border, genuine border security. number two, you have to do something with those who have been here already. number three, if they want these people to help the economy there's a reason why the g.o.p. did so bad in 2018 and they need to learn those lessons in 2020. >> laura: you are saying frank luntz, you are saying -- >> hold on. i can't let you do this to me. you're going to generate 10,000 screaming emails. >> laura: you are afraid of

emails now? >> yes, i am. the yelling and screaming. >> laura: please. >> we agree on policy. you asked me a question about language. the public wants immigration solved. they don't want this left and right. we've been doing a lot ofn polling on it in the last couple months. they want it to be beneficial to the economy.y they want people here for the right reasons and they want the border secure. they believe democrats and republicans -- >> laura: 51% the latest poll the hill -- yesterday or the day before, 51% of americans support the president's widespread raids to remove people from the country who are here illegally. i think the way this story is reported and i agree that republicans are terrible at telling stories generally. i think most people are just trying to take care of their families. they have compassion. they support organizations that

help people. but they are like, don't blame you for the stuff that obama started with the kids in the cages. don't blame me for that. blame congress for not doing its job.gr that's where i think the republicans have to tell their story better. >> they have to tell their story and be more articulate. they do have to be emotional. but i want to go back to the one visual because you actually showed people in cages. that's what the public does not want to see. can't we secure the border can't we do the right thing, the legal thing -- >> laura: not without money. the president can't secure the border with the snap of a hand. frank, we're out of time. we had a whole slate of things to talk about but we got stuck on this. that's all right. that's why we love frank. breaking new details and the curious case of congresswoman ilhan omar and the alleged marriage to her own brother. why is the media ignoring the story? the man who kicked off the investigation blows the whistle.

>> there's a lot of talk about the fact that she was married to her brother. i know nothing about it. i hear she was married to her brother. you're asking me a question about it. i don't know but i'm sure that somebody would be looking at it. >> laura: president trump referencing reports that congresswoman ilhan omar may have married her brother in 2009. omar denies it but a new report claims to have enough evidence for authorities to investigate the first somali american in congress. trace gallagher is in our west coast newsroom live with the details. >> investigative reporter david steinberg with pj media has been

following the story for almost a year. steinberg claims that through social media and numerous interviews with the minnesota somali community, he has the evidence to prove that ilhan omar entered into a sham marriage with her brother and participated in "fraudulent a activities and willful misrepresentation as related to her marital arrangements." according to his reporting, omar came into the u.s. in 1995 as a fraudulent member of the omar family. using their last name to apply for asylum. steinberg says her real name is ilhan elmi. in 2009, she married ahmed elmi her biological brother. who applied for asylum under hi real name. steinberg also says he has the evidence to identify omar's biological sisters and father. he goes on to say omar should be investigated for perjury immigration fraud, tax fraud student loan fraud, and bigamy. scott johnson worked with davidr steinberg on the piece and

earlier spoke with tucker carlson. watch. >> the sham marriage part i would put a 98% level of certainty. that's my view. the marriage to her brother part i would put at about a 90% level of certainty.er >> we should note fox news has also looked into these allegations but we have not found concrete evidence to confirm them. though ilhan omar has stonewalled nearly all questions and inquiries, therefore getting to the truth has proven elusive for a number of news outlets. her spokesperson told theh minneapolis "star tribune" that she is often the target of conspiracy theories and false accusations and that media outlets shouldn't "fan the flames of hate." though it appears the minnesota campaign finance and public disclosure board is also fanning the flames of hate because it has ruled that omar violated campaign finance rules and ordered that she reimburse her

former campaign committee. the board says omar and her current husband filed joint taxx returns. the problem is that at the time she was married to another man. namely ahmed elmi. laura. >> laura: wow. as trace laid out, fox has not independently verified this extensive information laid out by this independent journalist but it does raise the question why aren't any mainstream media outlets looking into this. omar's local paper, the "star tribune," penned a piece nearly a month ago. we reached out to them and they refused to give us the clear answer as to their futuree coverage. what about "the washington post"? "the new york times," ap. you think that issues over naturalization and immigration status of a member of congress has become so prominent, so powerful so fast would be of interest to the media. any glimmer of curiosity? here now, the men who actually

launched this investigation in the first instance minnesota state rep steve drazkowski. steve, what is behind the larger media blackout on this? >> laura, thank you, david steinberg and others have been working on this for about three years now, and they have really spoon-fed this to the media. when you've got media like the minneapolis "star tribune" in minneapolis here that has a giant fawning portrait of ilhan omar hanging on their lobby wall, i'm going to say that again. >> laura: what? >> i mean that literally. they have a portrait, large portrait of ilhan omar hanging on their lobby wall. in the "star tribune" office. >> laura: [laughs] we've got to get a copy of that. we've got to get a picture of that. that's hilarious. >> i can send it to you. >> laura: okay. >> that is what we're dealing with with here in minnesota. the media has been stonewalling this for the last year, and so

we are really frustrated and really appreciate you reaching out and covering some of this. >> laura: what steinberg says is that basically a 1995, it ilhan entered the united states as a fraudulent member of the "omar" family but that's not her family. the omar family is a second unrelated family which was being granted asylum by the united states. the omars allowed ilhan, her genetic sister and her genetic father to use false names to apply for asylum as members of t the omar family. ilhan's genetic family split up at this time. her three other siblings using their real names managed to get asylum in the u.k. that's just really bizarre. i think people have to realize that entire villages from somalia were basically brought into the united states as part of this new refugee plan to bring in -- now there are about

90,000. 80,000 or 90,000 members of the somali community in the st. paul minneapolis area. that's quite a story of i guess you're trying to freeload allegedly freeload on someonee else's asylum claim and just piling onto that family tree. if that's the case, do you lose your naturalization if it's discovered that you came in under false pretenses? >> yeah, i don't know the answer that and that's what i really need an investigation here and we've been clamoring for one. the interesting part is the family situation, laura, it's been described as a complicated thing but really it's simple. ilhan omar and her -- stayed together with the same guy since they were teenagers. they had two kids, and they eventually had a third but they had two kids and then decided to

go to ndsu to college. her brother from england came over and lived with the whole family during the time they were in college, then her brother left and went back to the u.k. and so the sham marriage stayed intact until 2017 when it become an inconvenience politically. she had to disband it at that point. >> laura: oh, i mean, wow is all i can say. what do people in minnesota think? i was just in minnesota for about eight days and people just roll their eyes when you mention her name. it wasn't a scientific study but i asked a bunch of people.he people in her district, is she still really popular? >> i don't spend a lot of time in her district. i expect it's about 80% democrat district and i suspect she is. in minnesota, outside that district, it's probably about 80% or 90% that would like her to have a full investigation. >> laura: all right, steve thanks so much.

up next, alan dershowitz involved in another legal, standoff and he's here to explain in moments. a home, and need cash? you should know about the newday va home loan for veterans it lets you borrow up to 100 percent of your home's value. the newday va loan lets you refinance your mortgages, consolidate your credit card debt, put cash in the bank, and lower your payments over $600 a month. call today. and get the financial peace of mind every veteran deserves.

>> laura: new york judge ruled today that financier jeffrey epstein will remain behind bars while awaiting trial for sex trafficking charges. his attorney pushed for him to stay in his $77 million new york mansion.. well, his recent arrest ramping up the war of words between one

of his former attorneys alan dershowitz, and an attorney for one of epstein's accusers david boies. boies is suing dershowitz for defamation. he told. "the wall street journal" "he wants to make this between him and me for some unknown and unknowable reason. i've decided to go after him. it's absurd. it's disproved." here to respond exclusively is alan dershowitz. alan, you've been vigorous in your defense in this case. what does david boies think he has? >> he has nothing. i have them on tape admitting this client was wrong, simply wrong and that she couldn't have been in the places where shehe claimed to have sex. each of the accusers said i didn't do it and then they met david boies and he change their mind. they committed perjury after meeting him.nd there is no coincidence. boies has about the worst record of ethical charges and ethical alleged violations of anyth

prominent lawyer in american history. people have gone after him for everything. weinstein. he once paid money to a witness on a contingency fee. the better the outcome, the more money he would get. he was accused of having to close relationship with a client in giving her free legal advice. one judge in federal court in new york said even a first-year ethics student would know thatrk what boies did was essentially unethical. why is he going after me?nt i have to tell you. i have a theory. i think he's projecting. david boies has a terrible reputation for sexual activities. i have had sex with one woman since the day i met jeffrey epstein. i challenge david boies to say under oath that he's only had sex with one woman during thatst same period of time. he couldn't do it. he has an enormous amount of chutzpah to attack me and

challenge my perfect, perfect sex life during the relevant period of time. he claims he's doing it pro bono. he's doing this for money. he's earned enormous fees from these same people and i'm sure he intends to earn more. he got case in order to get a billion dollars from leslient wexner. i'm going to beat him and i'm going to beat him bad. >> laura: what is the discovery like in all this? these charges back and forth. everyone gives up their documents and emails and texts? >> i have emails from thee accuser in which she admits she didn't have sex with me and she put me in her book in order to help sell the book and then she puts me in the book is somebody she didn't have sex with and the other accuser has emails that claim she had sex tapes of hillary clinton and bill clinton and donald trump and richard branson. these are the most tainted

serial liars imaginable and they all started telling their allies after they met david boies. i want a federal investigation of david boies. i call for an investigation of me by fbi. let the fbi sit in the court room. i will swear i never met these women. or these women who've been s basically trained by david boies. they will say they didn't meet me. one of us will be committingd perjury and i want the federal government to investigate. i went to the u.s. attorney with this. i'm afraid of nothing. i've nothing to hide. boies has plenty to hide. >> laura: i want to get your thoughts on another plea deal coming under scrutiny tonight. the "washington examiner" is reporting that then attorney general kamala harris cut a deal with former san diego mayor bob filner in 2013.me he was a democrat and escaped jail time and having to register as a sex offender in exchange for pleading guilty to lesser

crimes. 20 women had accused him of sexual harassment. could she be the next alex acosta? they filleted him even though he actually fought to get some jaiu time for your former client. >> i think in all these cases you have to look at what the standards were at the time. in the post-acosta world, no one is going to accept pleas in sex cases. today, they make deal and they get something out of it. no it's going to make deals after acosta. more week cases will come to trial. there will be more acquittals and the courts will be clogged with cases that should've been plea bargains. >> laura: alan, thank you so much. great to see you tonight. challengers lining up to take aoc's job in 2020. one of them is here next. one of them is here my experience with usaa

has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today. ♪ mno kidding.rd. but moving your internet and tv? that's easy. easy?! easy?

easy. because now xfinity lets you transfer your service online in just about a minute with a few simple steps. really? really. that was easy. yup. plus, with two-hour appointment windows, it's all on your schedule. awesome. now all you have to do is move...that thing. [ sigh ] introducing an easier way to move with xfinity. it's just another way we're working to make your life simple, easy, awesome. go to xfinity.com/moving to get started.

>> laura: a new poll in the congresswoman's district could have the squad leader worried. the key findings, 51% have an on favorable view of aoc and reportedly 33% are ready to vote against her. only 13% said they would vote

for her. so i guess if that poll holds true, it's not surprising that aoc has republican challenger. businesswoman scherie murray is running against her and her extreme agenda. the question is how will she play the race card, aoc, against a jamaican immigrant who happens to be republican. good to see you tonight. why are you the strongest g.o.p. candidate to run against aoc?on >> it's a pleasure to see you too, laura. i'm the strongest candidate because there's a crisis in queens and the bronx. that crisis is aoc. from the job-killing green new deal to killing the amazon deal in new york, i mean, she is just the wrong candidate at the right time. >> laura: yeah, well, it seems that people in aoc's district

get a little frustrated. they are frustrated by the amazon deal getting nixed. we will listen to one person in particular, josh bowen. >> our politicians, did they hit their head? this is the stupidest decision by local politician may be in the history of our local politics.ol b now we are some staten island sort of borough. no business, nothing happens here.ta >> laura: "new york post" headline march 30th, "her heart is not in the bronx. i thought aoc would be our savior but that's not the case complained roxanne delgado local activist, said she tried to get in touch with the congresswoman trying to save an animal shelter and cleanup parks in the district." we tried to call the congresswoman's office tonight and you can now leave a message. before it was difficult to leave a message. does that translate. this is a anti-aoc poll. i don't put a lot of stock in polls that are done by partisan

organizations. it's pretty tough when someone has the name i.d. that she has scherie, to cut through and get people to turn out and vote for you. >> listen, laura, when i toured the district, thinking about my possible run for the seat persons, residents didn't know who she was. your numbers reflect that laura. they didn't know who alexandria ocasio-cortez was. they didn't know who aoc was. but what was clear, as i spoke to those residents, the issues they felt were not being addressed, as we see the representative on the national stage more interested in the limelight then the concerns of the constituents in the district. >> laura: i get it. people knew i was having you on and they said we like the ideaw of someone running against aoc.t

they cited a tweet you sent out in june of last year where you said "congratulations alexandria. queens is headed in a new direction. it's time for new leadership."ia was that you? >> that was me and i was excited as a young woman seeing another young woman win. it was an incredible feat. she ousted the party chair former congressman joe crowley it was an incredible win, and she should be congratulated.d. but she won and what we see now is not the reason why she was elected to office. >> laura: all right, all right, so you've changed your mind from that tweet. >> look at what she's done on the national level. >> all right, we got to take a break, thank you for being with us tonight.. ..

one of the benefits we as a country give our veterans is eligibility for a va loan for up to 100% of your home's value. thank you, admiral. so if you need money for your family, call newday usa.

>> the end is inevitable. your kind is headed for extinction.

>> not today. >> laura: tha >> that is a sneak peek of the new sql to the classic film top gun. he knew it was going to happen. tom cruise has changed a bit. that's all-time we have tonight. check out my latest podcast. mike emanuel takes it from here. >> back in action against iran, new information about a surprise move, a powerful amphibious ship just took out an iranian thrown in the strait of hormuz tonight. decorated retired and immoral's take on the latest confrontation with iran standing by. donald trump to serve filing the send her back chat from last night. a member of the progressive squad, the freshman congresswoman calling the president fascist and racist. is that playing into