reminder for my producers to dvr that if you can figure it out. and if you can't, no need to go to college. you passed the only task that matters. in the meantime, have a great evening. i've got news for you, sean hannity, live from new york tonight. >> sean: yes, tucker. we are live from new york as usual. great soul. buckle out, welcome to be 19 because we are less than 12 hours away, robert mueller's public testimony is coming. we will get some questions answered the witch hunt. the breathless reporting has become the look who's running the show. the cowardly, adam schiff, jerry nadler, two of the biggest liars in congress hyping tomorrow's hearing is a major turning point in their fraudulent two and a half year witch hunt against the president, for separate conclusions, for separate investigations. they have lied again and again pray they have presented what is nothing short of a hoax. multiple conspiracy theories, made false promises, always

claiming the president is guilty of something. they can't say, but something. thick conspiracy, collusion, russia, russia, russia of your defrauding our elections, obstruction of justice, some of their fandom crimes. their hopes and prayers have always come up empty. i expect the same tomorrow should be much different but let me be honest, apparently mueller is going to stick to the report as it says and that's what the democrats are asking that. the report was clear. remember according to mueller, legal precedent on whether or not a sitting president can or cannot be charged because of the deal doj apology gog but tomorrow, the democratic playbook is clear. it's obvious it's transparent. they want robert mueller to contradict his own findings and implicate and smear the president. giving them that one sound bite that they and their friends in the media mob will play over and

over and over and over and over and over again. so they can have another 30 investigations for the next two years. meanwhile, republicans, my messages to you tonight. i'm not a registered republican peered i'm a registered conservative but you republicans have a responsibility tomorrow, and frankly a golden opportunity, to perform actual oversight. a broader audience than you would usually have, even fake news cnn an end mst and c, the conspiracy channel, their view is watching to and what you do tomorrow counts. you are the ones that must demand accountability for robert mueller. there are so many important questions that have never been asked or addressed and tomorrow, that is your job. what happens tomorrow will impact on a deep level what is the best constitutional god has given. equal justice on the law, equal application of our laws, this will impact generations to come because i don't want some weak

republicans in congress to blow it here we've been following the story and i just want to try to lay out a basic fundamental tutorial for these weak republicans that have no clue to follow. let me be clear about. this is not me telling people what to do. conservative lawmakers on the intel and judiciary committees, they don't need my advice. devin nunes knows more than i do. so does john ratcliffe. so does jim jordan. so does matt gaetz. so does lily go morris and many well-informed others. but sadly, there are a well, more than a few republicans. you need to pay attention and you need to do your job tomorrow and you better study of and if you need somehow, pay close attention but at some of you probably are not well informed on this topic, which frankly is pathetic and if you are a republican that fits into that category, pay attention. if you haven't read the mueller report, that makes you even more pathetic i think there are some of you out there. tomorrow night, my goal -- i don't want to come on the air

here at this time tomorrow and tell you, the viewers, the american people, that they blew it. that they had a golden opportunity. so, to literally prevent that from happening, i'm going to try and assist for the american public say, because wise, conspiracy theories, and a hoax have led most of the media coverage but here is my humble advice. always start with the basics. a hannity rule number one, no question should be longer than ten or 11 seconds. move fast. asks distinct, direct questions. yes or no questions. it's important to get in as many questions as time permits. move quickly. if mueller refuses to answer, move onto the next question. it reminded mr. mueller that you want answers to these questions. my second piece of advice, started at the beginning peered hillary clinton. listen closely. here are some questions. again, i'm only touching the surface. mr. mueller, thespian act, your career in law's enforcement, if

you have classified top secret information on a private server, does not violate the espionage act? yes or no, sir. remind him this is important and we will have equal justice under the law. if he says i didn't look into that, i don't know, move onto the next question. if anyone in america, mr. mueller, had a email subpoenaed and they decided to erase and bust up devices with hammers and destroy the hard drive, would that be a slam-dunk obstruction of justice case mr. mueller? if he answers yes or no, it doesn't matter can't. keep going. if he doesn't move onto the next set of questions, you move on quickly. mr. mueller, went to the counterintelligence investigation into the trump campaign began and why? mr. mueller, what about your original mandate? 's data mining, mandate rod wheeler rosenstein possible coronation between the russian government, members of the trump campaign, and any other matters that rose directly from that

investigation. mr.mueller, in your view, did you or a mandate allow you violations? taxing medallions, yes or no? loan applications, yes or no? tax fraud, yes or no, mr. mueller? mr.mueller, when did you first hear about the phony clinton bought and paid for it why shouldn't russian dossier? when did you first hear about i it? around one? tell us when peered when did you learn that russian dossier became the bulk of information used and fortifies applications to spy on a citizen and the trump campaign. when did you learn? around when did you learn? mr. mueller, as a career law enforcement officer, doesn't the information and advise a warrant need to be verified as true before presenting it to a judge?

mr. nine, the hill recently reported the fbi had a spreadsheet on dealing the dossier's claims. they found over 90% of the dossier was full of lies. mr. mueller, state department official kathleen to have like war and the fbi and doj about the dossiers bogus claims, they used it anyway. what you say? mr. mueller, the doj official, bruce ohr, he raised august in 2016 question about steele's credibility. hillary paid for the dossier and that it was never about verify but they used it anyway in the fisa warrants. did the fbi have an obligation to immediately, when they find out, that it's not true that they put it in those applications, do they need to go back to the phis accords with that information? yes or no? if russia collusion was your mandate, how is it possible you didn't investigate campaign mop research bought and paid for by hillary clinton, filled with russian lines? how is that possible mr. mueller? why not at least refer to another office for further investigation like you did with cohen and taxi it make it dalliance? at any point did you think to investigate if there was a premeditated fraud committed on the fisa court to spy on the

trump campaign? mr. mueller, and your final report, the dossier was hardly even mentioned. that is a lying, bought and paid for russian dossier. paid for by hillary clinton. why did you not investigate that? you had time to investigate lone applications, taxi medallions, taxes, why didn't you think that was important when that goes to the heart of your mandate? did you know that the fbi paid christopher steele, did you know and i'll get oligarchic paid christopher steele, did you know hillary paid christopher steele, did you know the fbi paid christopher steele? have you ever spoken to christopher steele? if so, how many times? what'd he say about his dossier? full of russian lies designed to her child and her hillary in the election? by the way, did bruce or act as a conduit after steel was accused of lying and leaking? were you aware that christopher steele was trying to get answers and send you information while you were

special counsel? and did you know that christopher steele, in an rogatory threat of perjury, i have no idea if any of this dossier is true, did you know he said that? when did he say that? is that not shock your conscience? now, you chose not to make any issue of this in your report. why, mr. mueller? if you had such a broad mandate to investigate an election in interference, why didn't you look into evidence that clinton not ukraine's health and the dnc was working to get ukraine's help to get dirt on trump to help hillary in the 2016 election russian mark why didn't you investigate that? does it matter if he influences coming from russia or ukraine? does not matter? next, it's important you have to cover mueller's staffing decision. it mr. mueller, civil question, is it true you chose andrew weissmann personally and that "the new york times" called him your pit bull? did you ever read licensed alive by sidney powell that talks

about wiseman's god awful horrific track of withholding exculpatory evidence? were you aware of that? when were you aware of that? were you aware that wiseman was a devout democrat and that he was at her clinton's victory party? who did the vetting and hiring of the rest of your staff? when did you become aware that your team was only made up of big-time democratic owners and zero republicans? were you aware that jeannie ray who works for you, worked on the hillary clinton foundation as her lawyer? why was she on your team? do not see a conflict of interest? why did you fire, or did you fire struck and page because we know andrew mccabe says he didn't. it's been reported you didn't save struck and pages of cell phones after you became aware that they had a nancy trump by us. why? why did you send those phones back to its factory that they are made into get cleaned? isn't that basic law enforcement 101, save the records? do you regret all hiring only

democrats? at the very least, do you realize the appearance of political violence and impropriety in your investigation? mr. mueller, one point in your investigation did you realize there was no collusion of conspiracy? why did the investigation continue after you learned the fundamental truth of what you are investigating? now, by the way, an issue of obstruction, that must be taken head-on. mr. mueller, were you having a tough time on the issue of obstruction or did you tell, not tell the ag, rod rosenstein, and others, doj policy constitutional considerations were not part of your thinking when it came to a decision not to charge the president with a crime? to the president exerts any executive privilege during your investigation was among the answer is no. did he allow your investigation of full access to the white house, in terms of their campaign staff, even the white house counsel, which i think is insane, did the president have the authority under article two to fire and

fbi director? or, even you? did he not have the constitutional authority to fire you, mr. mueller, if he decided to do so? tell us about the interview with president trump the day before you were hired as special counsel. is that true? in that meeting, you spoke to the president. did he tell you you weren't getting the job? did he give you a reason why he fire james comey? yes or no, mr. mueller? why did you not repeat yourself under those circumstances while considering you were denied a job i trump the day before? is it fair to say, mr. mueller, that your president, jim comey, what were you angry at his firing? we know the company lake's government materials to get you appointed. is that a potential violation of law? could that be a violation of the espionage act, sir? are you proud of the way you and your team treated george papadopoulos and you had foreign spies looking into him and that exculpatory things that he said

were apparently withheld? are you aware of that? what about your treatment of your team's treatment of lieutenant general michael flynn? well, general flynn serve this country. he was a combat veteran. 33 years. apparently he has been cooperating with your office for a period of time. as a crutch, sir? he pled guilty to lying but the fbi agent interviewing him, he didn't think they lied. right? but he made a plea agreement anyway. isn't it true that he likely made that plea agreement because he was going bankrupt? he had to sell his house? he could no longer afford legal counsel? is it true that the reports that this 33-year-old veteran and his family and his son that was in business with him was threatened by law enforcement, are you aware of that? are you aware that your team didn't take the plea to lied to the fbi that he had to even though the fbi agent and his interview didn't think he like? do you think he did it may be to save his family? do you find that type of prosecutorial tactics they are,

sir? i'm sure you're proud of the fact that we treated 33 year veteran this way. we know your friend james comey acted this way. on day four, when he sent his agents into interview flynn, something he said he wouldn't do to obama's team or bushes team, does that bother you about your friend? yes or no, mr. mueller? now, call me did this after his deputy fbi director mckay, well, he told flynn he doesn't need a lawyer when those lawyers were going in. do you believe in miranda rights? do you think it's a right way to treat a 30-year veteran of this country, sir question mike would you treat a veteran like that? let's look at some of the questions posed by our own gregg jarrett. they drill down even deeper on the state. mr. mueller, did you investigate christopher steele? using gps? when something, how they supplied russian information to the media, the fbi, and the gog jay to influence the election

question wanted you investigate whether john brennan and james clapper spread did russian information about trump to conspiracy theorists like michael michael isikoff, dave record in "the washington post"? isn't it true that your investigative team interviewed christopher steele at least once, likely choice and three times, what did he tossed you? did you interview confidential and performance helper? what did he tell you? wasn't it true that he provided the fbi within scope of tory information i carter page, george papadopoulos did not conspire with the russians? why was i not adhered to? is it true that bruce or a shared dossier information with your pitiful, andrew weissmann and mr. o martin early of augus? shouldn't they have refused themselves since they were early witnesses to the dossiers contents and they were told it was not verified? why did you select errands all the who represented oh, justin cooper, you know, the guy who helped set up and administer clinton email system, didn't he

smash clinton's blackberry devices or isn't he accused of that? now, the final phis application and the third were newer to surveilled carter page and also spy on then president trump, well, that was done in june of 2017. you were the special counsel. mr. mueller, were you either aware of this renewal? were you involved in this renewal? was any of the information presented to the fisa court verified? was the clinton dirty russian dossier still the bulk of information in that phis application? were you aware that much of the application was based on steals unverified dossier and when were you aware of it? did you ever discuss with rod rosenstein the prospects of his refusal from the case? wasn't not a witness in the same case that he was supervising? why didn't you demand his refusal? the special counsel team ever interview rosenstein is a witness? what did he tell you about the president's reasons for firing call me or his suggestions that

the president fired coming? when you met with president trump on may 16, 2017, why didn't you tell him you were considering, the next day, turns out, taking the position of special counsel to investigate him? why did you are a part at edit and misrepresent a telephone message left by trump attorney del with michael friends lawyer, robert homer? isn't it true that the old office of legal counsel opinion did not prevent you from rendering a conclusion on whether the evidence did or did not support obstruction of justice? as you can see, we could go on and on and on. keep it tight, keep it short. it doesn't answer, move on. if he starts rambling, mr. mueller, i only have 5 minutes. i don't have enough time. yes or no, sir. ask as many short questions as possible. your mission should be to inform the american people about a dirty dossier. use to literally spy on the opposition party and candidate

filled with russian lives that robert mueller ignored. let the american people know the truth. also, breaking news on the eve of this mueller testimony. he actually made a last-minute request that one of his top deputies, errands ugly, accompany him during the hearing. wow. this is pretty interesting because this guy served as mueller's chief of staff of the fbi. he also previously represented justin cooper. that's a former justin cooper advisor in the hillary scandal. he helped set up the secret service. he can't make this up. moments ago, the president tweeted just outback only to hear a last-minute change allowing a never trumper attorney to help out robert mueller with his testimony before congress to market what a disgrace to our system. i've never heard of this before. very unfair. should not be allowed. now we have a rigged witch hunt and a great testimony. it in case muller's practice sessions were not going well

because apparently he has been practicing all week, so has nadler. muller's request that one of his top deputies president at swansea and, not the only development. yesterday, letter from the department of justice instructed the nine that his testimony must remain within the boundaries of the public report. inductively, the media went nuts saying she part is i want the truth accusing the attorney general of trying to silence robert mueller on trying to intimidate him ahead of the testimony. we are only an entire new cycle, totally their fake phony outrage as usual. take a look. >> they are still scared he may go broke. there is still a little bit scared about 1% possibility. everything we know about bob mueller, -- stick i think it's incredibly arrogant to try to instruct him what to say is part of the ongoing cover-up by the administration to keep information away from the american people. >> you don't need to tell him to stick to the four corners of his

report. it's like telling a plan not to move here and he didn't need the flattery. >> okay, really? will that didn't happen. it was only one problem here didn't have all of the facts but it was robert mueller him self a requested letter. ouch. the media mob roasted him again. his reaction, former congressman fox news contributor, a guy who never lost case is a problem prosecutor, trey. actually thought about doing it for the whole hour because i have that many questions but i'm trying to give a flavor. you've got 5 minutes, you better get yes or no questions in and lay out the facts for the body's broader audience, in my opinion. >> yeah, you need to start it two weeks ago and you need to have an objective beauty needs to have a purpose. 5 minutes goes by quickly, you are not going to be able to cover all of those tranches you and i talked about last time i was on your show. but just keep in mind, mueller found some things, you can go there, he didn't find something, you can go there. he didn't bother to look for certain things, you can go ther there. the issue of the bias within the investigation and then you have

another category, legal issues, it's interesting to me the whether or not you can even obstruct and on predicated investigation pretty can certainly resist an unlawful arrest. so with the investigation on predicated, then can you actually even obstruct something that never should have begun? those are five tranches that you got to be prepared and i'm sure both sides will be for tomorrow. >> sean: let me ask you, if you have 5 minutes, is it better to ask shorter questions to get the facts out? because i believe there is an entire audience that note that does no hillary paid for russian lies. to commit fraud against the fisa court, but it is it predicated on unverified material that people like james comey swear was verified. how does he not investigate that but he has time for taxing medallions and federal violations, former congressman, trey gowdy? >> well, he's not going to help you much. but, he doesn't want to be there. he made that very clear in his press conference but he doesn't even want to testify. he's not going to deviate from

their report for two reasons, quite frankly a great number one, prosecutors are not supposed to deviate from their charging decision or noncharging but here's the real reason. let's assume he does say something new or different tomorrow. your follow-up question is going to be, why the hill was that not in your report? anything new or different or special or interesting that he says tomorrow -- >> sean: if he had time for farah and loma applications, how does he avoid a russian lost dossier full of lies that were used to spy on a presidential candidate in 2016, how do you avoid that issue? >> he does need to be asked about what he did not look into. i think the answer is going to be is going to blame rod rosenstein. he's going to say look, you can call the guy hired me but i would spend almost all of my time asking him about things he did not bother to look for such as the origin of this investigation in june of 2016. that's where i would spend my time. >> sean: i want to know why he

didn't delve into a phony russian dossier that was spread to the american electorate on the evil of an used to spy bought and paid for by hillary on the opposition party candidate. that is unconscionable considering his mandate took him in every other direction. trey gowdy, good to see you. thank you. when we come back, a huge breaking news story. it will impact tomorrow's well, hearing. john solomon will break it, sara carter, mark meadows, all straight-ahead. ♪ let's see, aleve is proven better on pain than tylenol extra strength. and last longer with fewer pills. so why am i still thinking about this? i'll take aleve. aleve. proven better on pain.

(past them because she didn't sknow they were talking to her.g and she would just walk right (deborah) i just could not hear. i was hesitant to get the hearing aids because of my short hair, but nobody even sees them. (avo) our nearly invisible hearing aids are just one reason we've been the brand leader for over 70 years. (deborah) when i finally could hear for the first time, i started crying. i could hear everything. (avo) call 1-800-miracle to start your 30 day risk-free trial and schedule your free hearing evaluation today.

lick fast like a cookie dough ninja. apply that same speed to the ford hurry up and save sales event. for the first time ever get 20% estimated savings on select ford models, plus earn complimentary maintenance through fordpass rewards. it all adds up. don't you love math? so get here asap because tasty deals and summer go fast. get in or lose out on 20% estimated savings on select ford models, plus earn complimentary maintenance through fordpass rewards. 4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom... is a stroke. 80 percent of all strokes and heart disease? preventable. and 149 dollars is all it takes to get screened and help take control of your health. we're life line screening...

and if you're over 50... call this number, to schedule an appointment... for five painless screenings that go beyond regular check-ups. we use ultrasound technology to literally look inside your arteries... for plaque which builds up as you age- and increases your risk for stroke and cardiovascular disease. and by getting them through this package, you're saving over 50%. so call today and consider these numbers: for just $149 you'll receive five screenings that could reveal what your body isn't telling you. i'm gonna tell you that was the best $150 i ever spent in my life. life line screening. the power of prevention. call now to learn more. >> sean: so not come of the cowardly schiff is continuing in a million directions ahead of muller's testimony.

he writes that his committee and rejects the basis of prophylactic, assertion of executive privilege by the doj. remember, it was the cowardly schiff and nadler and we know this has the potential you to totally boomerang and backfire especially as evidence amounts serious errors by mueller. news is just breaking by john solomon on the hill. we now have even more evidence mueller omitted key details about mysterious professor joseph ms. foote and tremblay, george papadopoulos, from his public report. it sounds like john durham is looking to get to the bottom of it all. solomon, this is huge and these questions should be asked tomorrow. >> absolutely. i can report tonight that john durham's investigation, the one that bill maher launched, is seeking to interview one of the key witnesses and it is a challenge to one of the key conclusions in the robert mueller report. if you concluded, he said that his contacts with the trump

campaign and george hopwood papadopoulos was the omission .4 the russian narrative. evidently, he used that to get to some russian contacts and talk about some russian emails. we now know that ms. cera has been contacted by germs prosecutors and he is prepared to provide evidence from his clients showing that it was not some professor, he was a long term western intelligence cooperator who is tasked specifically to approach papadopoulos and introduce him to russian figures in the spring of 2016. if that is not -- if what is been portrayed for the last three years at some organic collusion theory was in fact an intelligence operation that would change everything we know about the start of this case. >> sean: wow. also, i think questions about your ukrainian deal and the fact eight lee ukraine was trying to help hillary, that's a big deal, too, isn't it john? >> it is. it is extraordinary that i haven't seen one question in the last three or four weeks -- there is to clear cases of

foreign interference in the christopher russian election. christopher steele took information by russian i was paid by hillary and the ukraine embassy says the democratic national committee approached it and asked it for its help in trying to interfere with the election. >> sean: no matter if it's russia or ukraine, would they actually have anything? >> doesn't matter. even great britain, those are questions that have not been asked and robert mueller has to be asked, did you look at any of that? >> sean: i don't except he's going to answer but as a matter. the public is led to let the american people know the story that he missed. i appreciate it. he with the reaction, hearing freedom caucus member, mark meadows. fox news contributor, sarah. i asked about as many questions as i can spit out in 15 minutes. the questions out to be short, concise, and if he doesn't want to answer, doesn't matter. tell the american people about russian interference. there was russian interference.

there was a dirty dossier. there was a premeditative lie on the fisa court for separate times to spy on the trump campaign, transition, and presidency. tell the american people that russian story. mark meadows agree, disagree? >> i agree with that. there needs to be fewer speeches and more questions like you said. make sure that bob mueller has to answer those. even with the report, even john solomon just broke here a few minutes ago on your show. when we look at this, the conclusion that bob mueller reached are not supported by the facts. you know, it's interesting, adam schiff is writing a letter saying he wants to go beyond the scope of what is reported, he really doesn't want that because the deeper we died, the more we see that this whole report and its conclusion starts to fall apart. >> sean: we are just here and, by the way, that mueller's former chief of staff will be sworn at the intel hearing tomorrow. now, which one is going to be

quick behind closed doors? >> well, certainly behind judiciary below, he is bringing his staff member because he really has to have a grasp of the questions that are going to be asked of him. robert mueller is going to be faced with certainly a lot of questions coming at him and millions of directions. we know that the doj had asked that his testimony be limited just to the report itself. but think of all the exculpatory information. a man, this is what congress meant medicine is talking about. this is what trey gowdy was saying to you. when he left out. in one of the most important parts of john's story was joseph ms. foot and if he was ordered by the intelligence committee comic particularity western intelligence to arrange a meeting between george papadopoulos and the russians, this is going to be very interesting because that would mean he would've had to have a predicate, the intelligence committee, to do such a thing. were they targeting george papadopoulos cut? were they targeting the trump campaign?

why did this happen? the fact that they went on the record, yes, they were spying. >> they spied on foreign soil, they spied in the fisa warrant that allowed them a back charge of the trump campaign and then transitioned to presidency. mark meadows, what are the five big topics you want republicans to absolutely hammer mueller on? to go well, one, why did he not get to the bottom of the dossier that was false, that we know is false? the credibility of russian dossier, why did they not get to the credibility of christopher steele? why did they make connections to russia when they weren't there? you know, someone reporting tonight would indicate that. then ultimately, who was the one who led this investigation? was it a try? was it something that was set up, we are finding each and every day that this whole collusion narrative that was out there that adam schiff and jerry nadler keep talking about was really not there. and then, finally, did the spying that actually occurred,

why did bob mueller not come clean and show that in g, was surveillance and nobody has really talked about it that was done inappropriately and without a proper predicate? >> sean: you know, i realize, as mark meadows is not on his community, you've got a chance to march interview him -- >> now, i wish i would. but we are working with the team. soon okay. well, george nunez and i trust, devin nunes is going to be great. doug collins knows his stuff. greg gates is great. but i'm worried about some of these other people. sarah, what are your top issues you want covered and asked? >> look on my think one of the most important in the most valuable questions that they need to ask is to focus in on why did they not look at, you know, was stephan holbert in particular, and even with joseph ms. for, what information did he leave out of it as his support

that was particularly questioning carter page, information that we should have known about? did they say, as we have heard reported, that they had nothing to do with the russians and why did they continue to pitch for a pfizer? they need to ask these questions. >> if he docs, if he dodges, if you want to give monologues, cut them off at the path. make him answer the question and tell the story even if he won't cooperate it, tell the american people what really happened. that's what tomorrow needs to be about. that's my humble talk show host advice but what do i know. anyway, coming up, thank you both. you won't believe what congresswoman khalifa said this time. later, this video should never happen again. new york city police officers assaulted with buckets of water. rudy giuliani, theorist claiming mayor, de blasio, he speaks out, coming out, straight ahead. ♪

prevagen is the number one pharmacist recommended memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.

>> sean: yesterday we add the unbelievable footage of representative cleaves dramatic exit at a 2016 trump rally earlier today, the president gave his forceful response to this moment of insanity, among others. take a look. >> just this morning, misko leave to leave. from michigan, it's a great stay. we won michigan. there is no way she stands for the values of michigan. but, i watched her this morning. she is vicious. she is like a crazed lunatic. she is screaming just before she got into college, who elected her? she's screaming like a total

lunatic i one of our rallies. it's like a little rally and she's just screaming. this is not the same person, folks. sick of course, congresswoman rashia tlaib as part of the ever so powerful impacting all the 2020 democratic candidates, the fab four squad, as we now are calling them. anyway, congresswoman to leave, she actually once called for donald trump's deportation. sending a tweet in 2015 saying well, to port this expletive. well, based on i guess, democrats, that's a racist tree. in his reaction, fox, fox & friends weekend haute company's, pete hegseth, who did not invite me to his wedding, and fox news contributor, jim longino, jan, were you invited? because i didn't get invited. did you? >> wedding crashes.

he wanted he invites me, i will show up. >> i was very generous with the wedding gifts. >> i give the best wedding gift gifts. >> shawn, i'm thinking about getting remarried just to invite you to my wedding. all right, so pete, we have this squad, we now have their history, america's garbage, of course, the green new deal, the dumbest thing that will bankrupt this country and then of course, we've got this anti-semitism problem that is pretty rampant and yet, every 2020 presidential hopeful on the democratic side sucks up and adopts this crazy agenda. why? >> that's right. because they represent the soul of the modern leftist democratic party. they are aware of the vase. people active these folks would mean, were she did to leave was deranged even before she was infected with trump derangement cysts send them.

these are folks baptized into socialism, baptized in obsession with globalism, with radical environmentalism come with documentation or schools. they receive that indoctrination peered out say this. i don't call them the squad anymore because i worked with squads, they have two team leaders, to rifleman, to squad automatic members of the team. there are real squads, why don't they get a cool nickname like the squad? these are freshmen, no nothing congresswoman indoctrinated by the left where they are dominating in the headlines because they reflect to the modern left just like the 2020 candidates that are pairing the kind of foolish as they are talking about. >> because it is a service country, i guess i can't really hammer him too much because of the fact that we were checking from the guest list but, you know, i'm not invited. i guess you can come if you are the one. i guess. we will put up with it if you show up. dan bongino, they are our

influence feet. they do have this ridiculous comments and track record here what does it say about 2020 hopefuls and the democratic party? do you know, it's interesting to hear when you get past the ridiculous, outrageous video of tlaib in a crazy insane tweets as aoc and anti-semitic tweets of omar, there is something in there that is very disturbing and it's what kevin williamson, and an old book described as the old socialism, it's not like there's this old socialism, this is new socialism that that they subscribe to. they want to tax and regulate everything so they don't have to own a beer they already have your money and they can tell you how to run your business and aoc's chief of staff, interesting enough, and a recent interview, mentioned about the green new deal that it's for everyone. as it was about transforming the economy. >> this had nothing to do with climate change and the climate change agenda. by the way, play close attention, bun gina hannity, wedding crashes.

>> by the way, in all seriousness, congratulations, pete hegseth. we wish you guys the best fit when we come back, nypd cops have water buckets, thrown at them repeatedly. on the streets. all caught on tape. this cannot happen in this country. former new york city mary mayor, rudy giuliani explained later. this is insane. the left smearing the president's family, in this case, is anke because of the flog she got from her daughter. with this one, you think they can't sink any lower. they do. straight ahead. ♪

doctor bob, what should i take for back pain? before you take anything, i recommend applying topical relievers first. salonpas lidocaine patch blocks pain receptors for effective, non-addictive relief. salonpas lidocaine. patch, roll-on or cream. hisamitsu.

>> sean: multiple videos, police officers in new york city

being taunton, having objects thrown at them. they are coming out of new york city. chief news respondent, trace gallagher joins us with the very latest on this. this can't happen in this country. this is a disaster for the country if this continues. stickley, many agree with you. one of the videos is from harlem, one is from brooklyn. both taken during the recent northeast heat wave. both showing police trying to do their jobs and being taunted and soaked by buckets of water. one video shows police making an arrest and then, as they were hit with bucket after bucket, the officers just calmly walk away. the police unions as the video is proof that anti-cop lawmakers have gotten their wish and that nypd is now frozen, quoting here, this owner controls the streets and our elected leaders refused to allow us to take him back. new york mayor bill de blasio said the behavior is unacceptable and that he will not tolerate it but former mayor rudy giuliani oh says

de blasio is part of the problem. we should note that critics say it is worth remembering that in cities where police have stopped, cold, noticing crime, in other words, not enforcing it because they fear reprisal, violent crime rates have consistently gone out. >> trace gallagher, thank you, not here with reaction, trumps former attorney, the guy that was responsible for bringing the murder downgrade from about 2500 years to wait on under 500, remember almost every day you were called a racist. you saved thought thousands of lies every year what you were married. here we have -- no cop is going to want to save a life if this is allowed to continue. >> welcome of this is very, very dangerous and it's the result of years and years by this totally incompetent mayor of antipolice rhetoric going way back to when he was first in office and a guy came from baltimore and assassinated offices, ramos

assassinated him in a car. after he had made some very, very starless comments about the nypd, the nypd is the greatest law enforcement agency in the world, sean. it is not in all way police department. it is 60% nothing. it is white, black, asian, but the police officers you see being assaulted without water is an asian police officer, rookie. the poor kid is just out of the economy and what is he supposed to do? >> sean: i know what i would dupe you and i would turn around and fight back. >> well, i had at least, you know i run a security business. i work with a lot of police officers, fbi agents, i must have had 30 phone calls and 30 people that came up to me, police officers, and fbi agents and federal agents who said they understood with this kid was going through. if you are on the job, five, six years, taking a person, you would've arrested him. this kid is on probation. he knows the mayor will turn on

him. i don't care what de blasio is saying now. he has turned on the cops over and over again. we want so now he is going to be assaulted as a police officer? that's what we are now telling him? stickley, and where is schumer, aoc, our democratic representatives in congress, where are they standing on the police? no place where they are hiding. unbelievable. how interesting it for the police. >> sean: they can't do this to cause. no cop is going to want to save their life if this continues. >> this goes back to obama. he goes back to hillary clinton. not allowing unison a police officers at the democratic convention. they are disgraceful and the gentleman that use our right before me is absolutely right. this leads to very serious crim crime. deputy police commissioner or come officer today how the press conference. there are random shootings going on in new york now. people being killed and shot by

random bullets. i inherited that and i stopped it and bloomberg kept it that way. and, i can even say what i will call them. this mayor is a disgrace. and i don't care if he's saying it shouldn't happen. it shouldn't happen because you allowed it to happen. you encouraged it, my friend. >> sean: well, look, let me just ask you a question question. i want the real russian story told by republicans in these committees. your thoughts on all that. >> the real russian story is that mueller is a complete incompetent and he had a completely disgraceful set of prosecutors including wiseman who has been proven to have basically gotten pretty close to perjury at least three times, including trying to get a ukrainian oligarch to give false testimony and he has been basically exposed by the guy's lawyers and john solomon's column yesterday. that's what's got to come out here with scott's come out is, this was a plots. it was a counterintelligence

plot that was conceived in washington and played out by ukraine, u.k., australia, italy, they all cooperated to frame president trump. it was a coup. it was an attempt to stop them and then to take him out of office. it's what we call a frame up and more importantly, it's disgraceful and mueller either knew about it or he is so incompetent he didn't know about it which may be is even worse. stu and mr. mayor, we be watching. >> should be exposed tomorrow and if it it isn't i will expose it the next day. i have plenty of facts. soon okay, ivanka trump packed in a vile way, next. ♪ ♪ that a speaker is just a speaker. ♪ or - that the journey can't be the destination.

most people haven't driven a lincoln. discover the lincoln approach to craftsmanship at the lincoln summer invitation. right now, get 0% apr on all 2019 lincoln vehicles plus no payments for up to 90 days. only at your lincoln dealer. let's see, aleve is than tylenol extra strength. for up to 90 days. and last longer with fewer pills. so why am i still thinking about this? i'll take aleve. aleve. proven better on pain. (past them because she didn't sknow they were talking to her.g and she would just walk right (deborah) i just could not hear. i was hesitant to get the hearing aids because of my short hair, but nobody even sees them. (avo) our nearly invisible hearing aids are just one reason

we've been the brand leader for over 70 years. (deborah) when i finally could hear for the first time, i started crying. i could hear everything. (avo) call 1-800-miracle to start your 30 day risk-free trial and schedule your free hearing evaluation today. you ever wish you weren't a motaur? sure. sometimes i wish i had legs like you. yeah, like a regular person. no. still half bike/half man, just the opposite.

oh, so the legs on the bottom and motorcycle on the top? yeah. yeah, i could see that. for those who were born to ride, there's progressive.

♪ >> sean: the unhinged left is hitting new lows of hate, delusion and it gets worse every day.

accusing ivanka trump of racism for getting her daughter a new dog. the dog is white with blue eyes. can't we just be happy and 8-year-old kid is happy? we will never be the media mob. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham is here. >> laura: i've got to say i want to be surprised by that reaction, but i'm not. if ivanka had gotten a brown or black dog, she would have been criticized for that, for dominating a dog that's black. do you know what i mean? she can't win back no matter what she does. >> sean: does that mean anything, my dog is that bernese mountain dog. mostly black, white. >> laura: very progressive of you. >> sean: progressive? i just like big, beautiful dog. i don't really care, just like i love people. i don't care who they are or where they came from. >> laura: do you have a designer dog? i used to have the c