lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. a reminder for my producers to dvr that if you can figure it out and if you can't, no need to go to n college. you passed the only test that matters. in the meantime, have a great evening. i've got news for you, sean hannity, live from new york tonight. >> sean: yessir, tucker. we are live from new york as usual. great show. buckle up, welcome to "hannity." because we are less than 12 hours away, robert mueller's public testimony is coming. yes, we will get some questions answered about the witch hunt. expectations, hysteria, the breath is a party has begun but look who's running the show, the cowardly adam schiff, jerry nadler, two of the biggest liars in congress hyping tomorrow's hearing is a major turning point in their fraudulent two and a half year witch hunt against the president. forgo separate conclusions, forgo separate investigations. they have lied again and again and they have presented what is nothing short of a hoax. multiple conspiracy theories, made false promises, always claiming the president is guilty of something.

they can't say, but something. conspiracy, collusion, russia, russia, russia, defrauding our elections, obstruction of justice, some other phantom crimes. their hopes and prayers have always come up empty. i expect the same tomorrow it shouldn't be much different but let me be honest, if mueller is going to stick to the report as it says and that's what the democrats are asking. that very report was clear. no conspiracy, no collusion, no grounds for obstruction. remember, according to mueller, legal precedent on whether or not a sitting president can or cannot be charged because of thb doj policy are constitutional considerations was not a factor in the special counsel's conclusions. but tomorrow, the democratic playbook is clear. it's obvious, it's transparent. they want robert mueller to contradict his own findings and implicate, smear the president. giving them that one sound bite that they and their friends in the media mob will play over and over and over and over and over and over again. so they can have another 30

investigations for the next two years. meanwhile, republicans, my message is to you tonight. i'm not a registered republican. i'm a registered conservative but you republicans have a responsibility tomorrow, and frankly a golden opportunity to perform actual oversight. a broader audience than you would usually have, even fake news cnn and msdnc, the conspiracy channel,t their viewers will be watching too and what you do tomorrow counts. you are the ones that must demand accountability for robert mueller. there are so many important questions that have never been asked or addressed and tomorrowa that is your job. what happens tomorrow will impact on a deep level what is the best constitutional republic god has given man. equal justice on the law, equal application of our laws, this will impact generations to come because i don't want some weak republicans in congress to blow

it. we've been following the story and i just want to try to lay out a basic, fundamental tutorial for these weak republicans that have no clue to follow. let me be clear, though. this is not me telling people what to do. conservative lawmakers on the intel and judiciary committees, they don't need my advice. devin nunes knows more than i do. so does john ratcliffe. so does jim jordan. so does matt gaetz. so does many well-informed others. but sadly, there are a well, more than a few republicans. you need to pay attention and you need to do your job tomorrow and you better study up and if you need some help, pay close attention because some of you probably are not well informed on this topic, which frankly is pathetic and if you are a republican that fits into that category, pay attention. if you haven't read the mueller report, that makes you even more pathetic, i'm sure there areve some of you out there. tomorrow night, my goal -- i don't want to come on the air here at this time tomorrow and

tell you, the viewers, the american people, that they blew it. that they had a golden opportunity. so to literally prevent that from happening, i'm going to try and assist for the american public sake, because lies, conspiracy theories, and a hoax have led most of the media coverage, but here is my humble advice. always start with the basics. "hannity" rule number one: no question should be longer than ten or 11 seconds. move fast. ask succinct, direct questions. yes or no questions. it's important to get in as many questions as time permits.qu yes, no. move quickly. mueller refuses to answer, fine, move onto the next question. remind mr. mueller that you only have 5 minutes, you want answers to these questions. my second piece of advice, start at the beginning. hillary clinton. listen closely. here are some questions. again, i'm only touching the surface. mr. mueller, espionage act, your

career in law enforcement, if you have classified top secret remind him, this is important, we will have equal justice under the law. if he says i didn't look into that, i don't know, movee onto the next question. if anyone in america, mr. mueller, had a email subpoenaed andon they decided to erase and bust up devices with hammers and destroy the hard drive, would that be a slam-dunk obstruction of justice case mr. mueller? if he answers yes or no, it doesn't matter. keep going. if he doesn't move onto the next set of questions, you move onoi quickly. mr. mueller, when did the counterintelligence investigation into the trump campaign began and why? mr. mueller, what about your original mandate?at state the mandate, rod rosenstein possible coronation between the russian government, members of the trump campaign, and any other matters that roseme directly from that investigation. mr. mueller, in your view, did

your mandate allow you to investigate fara violations? taxi medallions, yes or no? loan applications, yes or no? tax fraud, yes or no, mr. mueller? mr. mueller, when did you first hear about the phony clinton bought and paid for russian dossier? when did you first hear about it?? d when? tell us when. when did you learn that russian dossier became the bulk of information used and fortifies f applications to spy on a citizen and the trump campaign? when did you learn? around when did you learn? mr. mueller, as a career law enforcement officer, doesn't the information ino a fisa warrant need to be verified as true before presenting it to a judge? mr. mueller, "the hill" recently reported the fbi had a spreadsheet on dealing the dossier's claims. they found over 90% of the dossier was full of lies. mr. mueller, state department

official kathleen kavalec warned the fbi and doj about the dossier's bogus claims, they used it anyway. what you say? mr. mueller, the doj official, bruce ohr, he raised august in 2016 question about steele's credibility. hillary paid for the dossier and that it was never about verified but they used it anyway in the fisa warrants. did the fbi have an obligation to immediately, when they find out, that it's not true that they put it in those applications, do they need to go back to the fisa court with thatin information? yes or no? if russia collusion was your mandate, how is it possible you didn't investigate campaign opp research bought and paid for by hillary clinton, filled with russian lies? how is thatn, possible, esmr. mueller? why not at least refer it to another office for further investigation like you did with cohen and taxi medallions? at any point did you think to investigate if there was a premeditated fraud committed on the fisa court to spy on the trump campaign? mr. mueller, in your final report, the dossier was hardly even mentioned.

that is a lying, bought and paid for russian dossier. paid for by hillary clinton. why did you not investigate that? you had time to investigate loan applications, taxi medallions, taxes, why didn't you think that was important when that goes to, the heart of your mandate? did you know that the fbi paid christopher steele? did you know an oligarch paid christopher steele, did you know hillary paid christopher steele, did you know the fbi paid christopher steele? have you ever spoken to christopher steele? if so, how many times? what did he say about his dossier full of russian lies designed to hut trump and benefit hillary in the election? by the way, did bruce ohr act as a conduit after steele was fired for lying and leaking? in other words, there are notes that steele has. were you aware that christopher steele was trying to get answers and send you information while you were special counsel?

and did you know thatouia christopher steele, in an k interrogatory under threat of perjury, i have no idea if any of this dossier is true, did you know he said that? when did he say that? does that not shock your t conscience? now you chose not to make any issue ofof this in your report. why, mr. mueller?o if you had such a broad mandate to investigate election interference, why didn't you look into evidence that clinton sought ukraine's help and the dnc was working to get ukraine's help to get dirt on trump to help hillary in the 2016 election russian. why didn't you investigate that? does it matter if the influence is coming from russia or ukraine? does it matter? next, it's important you have to cover mueller's staffing decision. mr. mueller, simple question, is it true you chose andrew weissmann personally and that "the new york times" called him your pit bull? did you ever read "license to lie" by sidney powell that talks

about weissmann's god awful horrific track of withholding exculpatory evidence? were you aware of that? when were you aware of that? were you aware that weissmann was a devout democrat and that he was at clinton's victory party? who did the vetting and hiring of the rest of your staff? when did you become aware that your team was only made up of big-time democratic donors and zero republicans? were you aware that jeannie rhee, who worked for you, worked on the hillary clintoncl foundation as her lawyer? why was she on your team? do you not see a conflict of interest? why did you fire, or did you fire strzok and page because we know andrew mccabe says heau didn't. it's been reported you didn't save strzok and pages ofof cell phones after you became aware that they had an anti-trump bias. why? why did you send those phones back to its factory that they

are made into get cleaned? isn't that basic law enforcement 101, save the records? do you regret all hiring only democrats? at the very least, do you realize the appearance of political violence and impropriety in yourr investigation? mr. mueller, at what point in your investigation did you realize there was no collusion of conspiracy? why did the investigationn continue after you learned thehe fundamental truth of what you were investigating? now, by the way, the issue of obstruction, that must be taken head-on. mr. mueller, were you having a tough time on the issue ofhe obstruction or did you tell, not tell the ag, rod rosenstein, and others, dojj policy constitutional considerations were not part of your thinking when it came to a decision not t charge the president with a crime? did the president exert any executive privilege during your investigation? the answer is no. did he allow your investigation of full access to the white house, in terms of their campaign staff, even the white house counsel, which i think is insane? did the president have the authority under article two to fire an fbi director?

or, even you?? did he not have the constitutional authority to fire you, mr. mueller, if he decided to do so? tell us about the interview with president trump the day before you were hired as special counsel. is that true? in that meeting, you spoke to the president.ha did he tell you you weren't getting the job? did he give you a reason why he fired james comey? yes or no, mr. mueller? why did you not recuse yourself under those circumstances while considering you were denied a job by trump the day before? is it fair to say, mr. mueller, that you are friends with jim comey. were you angry at his firing, mr. mueller? weme know about comey leaked government materials to get you appointed. is that a potential violation of law? could that be a violation of the espionage act, sir? are you proud of the way you and your team treated george? papadopoulos and had foreign a spies looking into him and that exculpatory things that he said were apparently withheld? are you aware of that?

what about your treatment of your team's treatment ofat lieutenant general michael flynn? well, general flynn served this country. he was a combat veteran. 33 years. apparently he has been cooperating with your office for a period of time. is that correct, sir? he pled guilty to lying but the fbi agent interviewing him, he didn't think they lied. right? but he made a plea agreement anyway. isn't it true that he likely made that plea agreement because he was goingy bankrupt? he had to sell his house? he could no longer afford legal counsel? is it true that the reports that this 33-year-old veteran and his family, his son that waset in business with him, was threatened by law enforcement, are you aware of that? are you aware that your team didn't take the plea to lying to the fbi that he had to even though the fbi agent in his a interview didn't think he lied? do you think he did it may be to save his family? do you find that type of prosecutorial tactic fair, sir?

you're proud of the fact that we treated a 33 year veteran this way. we know your friend james comey bright did an interview that he took advantage of the chaos in the trump administration on day four when he said his agency and interview flynn, something he said heer wouldn't do to obama's team or bush's team. does that bother you about your friend? yes or no, mr. mueller? now, comey did this after his deputy fbi director mccabe, well, he told flynn he doesn't need a lawyer when those lawyers were going in. do you believe in miranda rights? do you think it's a right way to treat a 30-year veteran of this country, sir question mike would you treat a veteran like that? let's look at some of the questions posed by our own gregg jarrett. they drill down even deeper on the state. mr. mueller, did you investigate christopher steele? using gps? glenn simpson, how they supplied russian information to the media, the fbi, and the

doj to influence the election question wanted you investigate whether john brennan and james clapper spread did russian information about trump to conspiracy theorists like michael isikoff, dave corn in "the washington post"? isn't it true that your investigative team interviewed christopher steele at least once, likely twice or three times, what did he tell you?os did you interview confidential informant stephan helper? what did he tell you? wasn't it true that he provided the fbi within scope of information i carter page, george papadopoulos did not conspire with the russians? why was that not adhered to? is it true that bruce ohr shared dossier information with your pitiful, andrew weissmann and mr. omad in early of august 2016? shouldn't they have refused themselves since they were early witnesses to the dossier's contents and they were told it was not verified? why did you select aaron zelby the who represented oh, justin cooper, you know, the guy who helped set up and administer clinton email system, didn't he smash clinton's blackberry devices or isn't he accused of that?

now the final fisa application and the third were newer to surveilled carter page and also spy on then president trump, well, that was done in june of 2017. you were the special counsel. mr. mueller, were you either aware of this renewal? were you involved in this renewal? was any of the information presented to the fisa court verified? was the clinton dirty russian dossier still the bulk of information in that fourth fisa application? were you aware that much of the application was based on steele's unverified dossier and when were you aware of it? did you ever discuss with rod rosenstein the prospects of his recusal from the case? wasn't rod a witness in the same case that he was supervising? why didn't you demand his recusal? did the special counsel team ever interview rosenstein as a witness? what did he tell you about the president's reasons for firing comey or his suggestions thatel the president fire comey?

when you met with president trump on may 16, 2017, why didn't you tell him you were considering, the next day, turns out, taking the position of special counsel to investigate him? why did your report edit ouand misrepresent a telephone message left by trump attorney dowd with michael flynn's lawyer, robert kellner? isn't it true that the old office of legal counsel opinion did not prevent you from rendering a conclusion on whether the evidence did or did not support obstruction of justice?el as you can see, we could go on and on and on. keep it tight, keep it short. if he doesn't answer, move on. if he starts rambling, "mr. mueller, i only have 5 minutes. i don't have enough time.le yes ore. no, sir." ask as many short questions as possible. your mission should be to inform the american people about aul dirty dossier. used to literally spy on the opposition party candidate,

filled with russian lies that robert mueller ignored. let the american people know the truth. also breaking news on the eve of this mueller testimony. he actually made a last-minute request that one of his top deputies, aaron zebly, accompany him during the t hearing. wow. this is pretty interesting because this guy served as mueller's chief of staff at the fbi. he also previously represented justin cooper. that's the former clinton advisor in the hillary scandal. he helped set up the secret service. can't make this up.pe moments ago, the president tweeted, "just got back only to hear a last-minute change allowing a never trumper attorney to help out robert mueller with his testimony before congress tomorrow. what a disgrace to our system. i've never heard of this before. very unfair. should not be allowed. now we have a rigged witch hunt

and a great testimony. it in case muller's practice sessions were not going well because apparently he has been practicing all week, so has nadler. muller's request that one of his top deputies president at swansea and, not the only development. yesterday, letter from the yesterday, letter from the department of justice instructed the nine that his testimony must remain within the boundaries of the public report. productively, the media want to nuts, saying, c, barr does not want the truth! accusing the attorney general of trying to silence robert mueller, or intimidate him ahead of the testimony. for almost an entire new cycle, they were totally using their fake phony outreach as usual. take a look. >> they are still scared he may go broke. they are still a little bit scared about that 1% possibility. everything we know about bob mueller, he's a rule follower. >> i think it's incredibly arrogant to instruct him what to say, it is part of the ongoing cover up by the administration to keep information away from american people. >> you don't need to tell him to stick to the four corners of his report. it's like telling a plant not to

move. and he didn't need the letter. >> sean: okay, really? that didn't happen. only one problem here, did not have all the facts, it was robert mueller himself who requested the letter. ouch. the media mob roasted him again. his reaction, former congressman fox news contributor, a guy d wo never lost case is a problem prosecutor, trey gowdy. actually thought about doing it for the whole hour because i have that many questions but i'm trying to give a flavor. you've got 5 minutes, you better get yes or no questions in and lay out the facts for the broader audience, in my opinion. >> yeah, you need to start it two weeks ago and you need to have an objective, you need to have a purpose. 5 minutes goes by quickly, you are not going to be able to cover all of those tranches you and i talked about last time i was on your show. but just keep in mind, mueller found some things, you can go there, he didn't find some things, you can go there. he didn't bother to look for certain things, you can go there. the issue of the bias within the investigation and then you have another category, legal issues, it's interesting to me the

whether or not you can even obstruct an unpredicated investigation. you can certainly resist an unlawful arrest. so if the investigation is unpredicated, then can you actually even obstruct something that never should have begun? those are five tranches that you got to be prepared and i'm sure both sides will be for tomorrow. >> sean: let me ask you, if you have 5 minutes, is it better to ask shorter questions to get the facts out? because i believe there is an h entire audience that doesn't know that hillary paid forie russian lies. to commit fraud against the fisa court, because it was predicated on unverified material that people like james comey swear was verified.d how does he not investigate that but he has time for taxi medallions and fara violations, former congressman, trey gowdy? >> well, he's not going to help you much. he doesn't want to be there. h he made that very clear in his press conference. he doesn't even want to testify. he's not going to deviate from their report for two reasons,,

quite frankly. number one, prosecutors are not supposed to deviate from their charging decision or noncharging but here's the real reason. let's assume he does say something new or different tomorrow. your follow-up question is going to be, why the hell was that not in yourow report? anything new or different or special or interesting that he says tomorrow -- >> sean: if he had time foran fara and loan applications, how does he avoid a russian dossier full of lies that were used to spy on a presidential candidate in 2016, how do you esavoid that issue? >> he does need to be asked about what he did not look into. i think the answer is going to be is going to blame erod rosenstein. he's going to say, look, you can call the guy hired me and the guy that sent my jurisdiction, but i would spend almost all my time, asking him about things he did not bother to look for, such as the origin of this investigation in june of 2016. that's where i would spend my time. >> sean: i want to know why he didn't delve into a phony russian dossier that was spread

to the american electorate on eve of an election, and used to spy, russian lies, used just by, bought and paid for by hillary coming on the opposition party candidate. that is unconscionable considering his mandate took him in every other direction. trey gowdy, good to see you. thank you. when we come back, a huge breaking news story. it will impact tomorrow's, well, hearing. john solomon will break it, sara carter, mark meadows, all straight-ahead. ♪ sara carter, mark meadows, all straight-ahead. straight-ahead. ♪ i will always be ready...

for every storm... and disaster that threatens my community. i will always be there to protect my neighbors... and my country. we are the army national guard. visit nationalguard.com to learn more about part-time service.

wiswitch wireless carriersn bring in your own phone, we are the army national guard. and save hundreds of dollars. it's pretty much the easiest way to save since sliced bread. sure is. because savings is as savings does. and sometimes you've just got to stop and smell the savings. i'm sorry, i think you mean roses. oh right. you need to stop and smell the roses of savings. bring in your own phone, switch to xfinity mobile and save hundreds of dollars a year. now that's simple, easy, awesome. get $100 back when you bring in an eligible phone. click, call, or visit a store today. ♪ >> sean: so now the cowardly schiff is continuing in a million directions ahead of muller's testimony. actually writing to the ex-special counsel denied that his committee rejects the

"baseless, prophylactic, assertion of executive privilege by the doj." remember, it was the cowardly schiff and nadler, we know this has the potentially totally boomerang and backfire especially as evidence amounts serious errors by mueller. news is just breaking by john solomon, "the hill." we now have even more evidence mueller omitted key details about mysterious professor joseph misfud and trump aide george papadopoulos, from his publicic report. it sounds like john durham is looking to get to the bottom of it all. john solomon, this is huge and these questions should be asked tomorrow. >> absolutely. i can report tonight that john durham's investigation, the one that bill barr launched, is seeking to interview one of the key witnesses and it is ahe challenge to one of the key conclusions in the robert i mueller report. if you are a member, robert that

misfud claims that george papadopoulos was the omission point for the whole russian narrative. he used joseph misfud to get to the russian contacts and talk about russian emails. we now know that misfud's lawyers been contacted by prosecutors and he is prepared to provide evidence from his clients showing that it was not some professor, he was a long term western intelligence cooperator who was tasked specifically to approach papadopoulos and introduce him to russian figures in the spring of 2016. if that is not -- if what is been portrayed forre the last three years as some organic collusion theory was in fact an intelligence operation that would change everything we know about the start of this case. >> sean: wow.ut also, i think questions about your ukrainian deal and the fact that ukraine was trying to help hillary, that's a big deal, too, isn't it john? >> it is. it is extraordinary that i haven't seen one question in the last three or four weeks -- there is two clear cases of foreign interference in the

2016 election. christopher steele was a foreigner who took information from russia, paid by hillary, and the ukraine embassy says the democratic national committee approached her and ask foror a p was trying to appear in the election. >> sean: no matter if it's russia or ukraine, would they actually have anything? >> doesn't matter.r even great britain, those are questions that have not been asked and robert mueller has to be asked, did you look at any of that? >> sean: i don't except he's going to answer but it doesn't matter. the republicans need to let the american people know the story that he managed purposely in my opinion. i appreciate it. here with reaction, freedom caucus member, mark meadows. fox news contributor sara carter. i asked about as many questions as i can spit out in 15 minutes. the questions out to be short, concise, and if he doesn't want to answer, doesn't matter. tell the american people about russian interference. there was russian interference. there was a dirty dossier.e

there was a premeditated lie on the fisa court four separate times to spy on the trump campaign, transition, and presidency. tell the american people that russian story. mark meadows, agree, disagree? >> i agree with that. there needs to be fewer speeches and more questions like you said. make sure that bob mueller has to answer those. even with the reporting that john solomon just broke here ave few minutes ago on your show, when we look at this,s the conclusions that bob mueller reached are not supported by the facts. a you know, it's interesting, adam schiff is writing a letter saying he wants to go beyond the scope of what is reported, he really doesn't want that because the deeper we dive, the more we see that this whole report and its conclusion starts to fall apart. >> sean: we are just hearing, by the way, that mueller's former chief of staff will be sworn at the intel hearing tomorrow. not judiciary. which one is going to be quick behind closed doors?

>> [laughs] well, certainly behind judiciary but look, he is bringing his staff member because he really has to have a grasp of the questions that are going to be asked of him. robert mueller is going to be faced with certainly a lot ofes questions coming at him in millions of directions. we know that the doj had asked that his testimony be limited just to the report itself. but think of all the exculpatory information.th i mean, this is what congressman meadows is talking about. this is what trey gowdy was saying to you. what he left out. and one of the most important parts of john's story was joseph misfud and if he was ordered by the intelligence committee, particularity western intelligence, to arrange a meeting between george papadopoulos and the russians, this is going to be very interesting because that would mean he would've had to have a predicate, the intelligence committee, to do such aad thing. were they targeting george t papadopoulos? were they targeting the trump campaign? why did this happen? the fact that they went on the record, yes, they were spying.

>> sean: they spied on foreign soil, they spied in the fisa warrant that allowed them a back door into the trump campaign and then transition and presidency. mark meadows, what are the five big topics you want republicans to absolutely hammer mueller on? >> well, one, why did he not get to the bottom of the dossier that was false, that we know is false? the credibility of russian dossier, why did they not get to the credibility of christopher steele? o why did they make connections to russia when they weren't there? you know, some of the reporting tonight would indicate that. then ultimately, who was the one who led this investigation? was it a trap? was it t something that was set up? we are finding each and every day that this whole collusion narrative that was out there that adam schiff and jerry nadler keep talking about was really not there. and then, finally, did the spying that actually occurred, why did bob mueller not come

clean and show that indeed, was surveillance and nobody has really talked about, that was done inappropriately and without a proper predicate? >> sean: you know, sara, i realize, guys like mark meadows is not on this committee, you've got a chance to interview him -- >> no, i wish i would. but we are working with the team. soon okay. devin nunes is going to be great. doug collins knows his stuff. gaetz is great. but i'm worried about some of these other people. sara, what are your top issues you want covered and asked? >> look, i think one of the most important in the most valuable questions that they need to ask is to focus in on why did they not look at,ou you know, was stefan halper in particular, and even with joseph misfud, what information did he leave out of it as his support that was particularly questioning carter page,

was their exculpatory information that we should have knownpa about? did they say, as we have heard reported, that they had nothing to do with the russians and why did they continue to push for a fisa? they need to ask these questions. >> sean: here's my last bedded my advice, if he ducks, if he dodges, if you want to give monologues, cut him off at the pass. make him answer the question and tell the story even if he won't cooperate, tell the american people what really happened. that's what tomorrow needs to bo about. that's my humble talk show host advice but what do i know. anyway, coming up, thank you both. you won't believe what congresswoman tliab said this time. pete had pete had sick, dan boo next later, this video should never happen again. c new york city police officers assaulted with buckets of water. rudy giuliani, furious, blaming comrade de blasio, he speaks out, coming out, straight ahead. ♪

when we started our business

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box,

and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free.

♪ >> sean: yesterday we had the unbelievable footage of representative tliab's dramatic exit at a 2016 trump rally. earlier today, the president gave his own forceful response to this moment ofve insanity, among others. take a look. >> just this morning, this tliab. [boos] from michigan, it's a great state. we won michigan. there is no way she stands for the values of michigan. but i watched her this morning. she is vicious. she is like a crazed lunatic. she is screaming -- this is before she got into congress, who elected her? she's screaming like a total lunatic at one of our rallies.

it's like i'm giving a little rally and she's just screaming.l this is not a sane person, folks. >> sean: of course, congresswoman tlaib is part of the ever so powerful impacting all the 2020 democratic candidates, the fab four squad, as we now are calling them. anyway, congresswoman tlaib, she actually once called for donald trump's deportation. sending a tweet in 2015 saying well, deport this expletive. well, based on, i guess,hi democrats, that's a racist tweet. here with reaction, fox & friends weekend host, pete hegseth, who didib not invite me to his wedding, and fox news contributor, dan bongino. dan, were you invited? because i didn't get invited. did you? >> wedding crashes. >> if he invites me, i will

show up. i am very generous with the wedding gifts. some of your staff knows this. >> sean: i give the best wedding gifts. >> i heard that. >> i'm thinking about getting remarried just to invite you to my wedding. [laughter] >> sean: all right, so pete, we have this squad, we now have their history, america is garbage, of course, the green new deal, the dumbest thing that will bankrupt this country and then of course, we've got this anti-semitism problem that is pretty rampant and yet, every 2020 presidential hopeful on the democratic side sucks up and adopts this crazy agenda. why? >> that's right. because they represent the soul of the modern leftist democratic party. they are aware of the base. people elected these folks. i mean, rashida tlaib was deranged even before she was infected with trump derangement syndrome. these are folks baptized into socialism, baptized in obsession

with globalism, with radical environmentalism, with indoctrination in our schools. they receive that indoctrination. i'll say this. i don't call them the squade anymore because i worked with squads, they have two team leaders, two rifleman, two squad automatic members of the team. there are real squads, why don't they get a cool nickname like the squad? these are freshmen, know nothing congresswoman indoctrinated by the left. they are dominating in the headlines because they reflect to the modern left just like the 2020 candidates that are parroting the kind of foolish as they are talking about. >> sean: because pete did serve our country, i guess i can't really hammer him too much because of the fact that we were checking from the guest list but, you know, i'm not invited. i guess you can come if you really want to. i guess. we will put up with it if you

show up. dan bongino, they are our influence. they do have this ridiculous comments and track record here what does it say about 2020 hopefuls and the democratic party? >> you know, it's interesting to hear when you get past the ridiculous, outrageous video of tlaib and the crazy, insane tweets of aoc and the anti-semitic tweets of omar, there is somethinger in there that is very disturbing and it's what kevin williamson,h in an old book described as the old socialism, it's not like there's this old socialism, it's not the old socialism or they were take over the means of production. they want to tax and regulate everything so they don't have to own a beer they already have your money and they can tell you how to run your business and aoc's chief of staff, interesting enough, in ac' recet interview, mentioned about the green new deal that it's for everyone. as it was about transforming the economy. >> sean: this had nothing to do with climate change and the climate change agenda. by the way, play close attention, bongino, hannity, wedding crashes.io by the way, in all

seriousness, congratulations, pete hegseth. we wish you guys the best. when we come back, nypd cops have water buckets thrown at them repeatedly. on the streets. all caught on tape. this cannot happen in this country! rudy giuliani explains. this is insane.. the left smearing the president's family, in this case, ivanka, because of the dog she got for her daughter. you think they can't sink any lower. they do. straight ahead. ♪ since you're heading off to school, i got you this brita. dad... i just got a zerowater. but we've always used brita. it's two stage-filter... doesn't compare to zerowater's 5-stage. this meter shows how much stuff, or dissolved solids, gets left behind. our tap water is 220. brita? 110... seriously? but zerowater- let me guess. zero?

yup, that's how i know it is the purest-tasting water. i need to find the receipt for that. oh yeah, you do.

♪ >> sean: multiple videos, police officers in new york city

being taunted, having objects thrown at them. they are coming out of new york city. chief news respondent, trace gallagher joins us with the very latest on this. this can't happen in this country. t this will end in a disaster for the country if this continues. >> yeah kemeny agree with you one of the videos is from harlem, one is from brooklyn. both taken during the recentro northeast heat wave. both showing police trying to do their jobs and being taunted and soaked by buckets of water. one video shows police making an arrest and then, as they were hit with bucket after bucket, the officers just calmly walk away. the police union says the video is proof that anti-cophe lawmaks have gotten their wish and that nypd is now frozen, quoting here, disorder controls the streets and our elected leaders refuse to allow us to take them back.. new york mayor bill de blasio said the behavior is unacceptable and that he willay not tolerate it but former mayor rudy giuliani says de blasio is part of the problem. we should note that critics say

it is worth remembering that in cities where police have stopped, "noticing crime," in other words, not enforcing it because they fear reprisal, violent crime rates have i consistently gone up.im >> sean: trace gallagher, thank you, here with reaction, trump's former attorney, former mayor of new york city, the guy that was responsible for bringing the murder rate down from about 2500 years to underd. 500, remember almost every day you were called a racist. you saved thought thousands of here we have -- no cop is going to want to saveo a life if this is allowed to continue. >> well, this is very, very dangerous and it's the result of years and years by this totally incompetent mayor of antipolice rhetoric going way back to when he was first in office and a guy came from baltimore and assassinated offices, ramos assassinated him in a car. after he had made some very,

very spurilous comments about the nypd, the nypd is the greatest law enforcement agency in the world, sean. it is not in all way police department. it is 60% nothing. it is white, black, asian, but the police officers you see being assaulted with that water is an asian police officer, srookie. the poor kid is just out of the academy -- >> sean: what is he supposed to do? i know what i would do, i would turn around and fight back. >> well, i had at least, you know i run a security business. i work with a lot of police officers, fbi agents, i must have had 30 phone calls and 30 people that came up to me, police officers, and fbi agentse and federal agents who said they understood what this kid was going through. if you are on the job, five, six years, taken that person, you would've arrested him. this kid is on probation. he knows the mayor will turn on him. i don't care what de blasio is saying now.ur

he has turned on the cops over and over again. >> sean: now he has to accept that he will be assaulted as a police officer? that's what we are telling him? >> and where is schumer, aoc, our democratic representatives in congress, where are they standing on the police? no place, they are hiding. bernie carriker standing up for the police, pat planter standing up for the police. >> sean: they can't do this to cops. no cop is going to want to save their life if this continues! >> this goes back to obama. he goes back to hillary clinton. >> sean: cambridge, ferguson, baltimore. >> not allowing unison a police officers at the democratic convention. they are disgraceful and the gentleman that was on before me is absolutely right. this leads to very serious crime. deputy police commissioner or officer today held a press conference. there are random shootings going on in new york now. people being killed and shot by random bullets.

i inherited that and i stopped it and bloomberg kept it that way. and i can't even say what i will call him. this mayor is a disgrace. and i don't care if he's saying it shouldn't happen. it shouldn't happen because you allowed it to happen. you encouraged it, my friend. >> sean: well, let me just ask you a question about tomorrow. i want the real russian story told by republicans in these committees. your thoughts on all that? >> the real russian story is that mueller was a complete incompetent and he had a completely disgraceful set of prosecutors including weissmann who has been proven to have basically gotten pretty close to suborning perjury at least three times, including trying to get a ukrainian oligarch to give false testimony and he has been basically exposed by the guy's lawyers in john solomon's column yesterday. that's what's got to come out. what's got to come out is, this was a plot. it was a counterintelligence plot that was conceived in

washington and played out by ukraine, u.k., australia, italy, they all cooperated to frame president trump. to frame him. >> sean: it was an attempted coup. >> it was an attempt to stop them and take him out of office. as will recall a frame up in law enforcement. it's disgraceful. mueller knew about it, or he so incompetent, he didn't know about it, which maybe is even worse. >> sean: mr. mayor, we'll be tctching. be it should be exposed tomorrow. if it isn't, i'll expose it the next day. i have plenty of facts. >> sean: i do, too. you can come on my show and we'll do it for the whole hour. ivanka trump attacked in a vile way, next. ♪ pain receptors for effective, non-addictive relief. salonpas lidocaine. patch, roll-on or cream. hisamitsu.

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need,

slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free. but i'm more than a number. when i'm not teaching, i'm taking steep grades and tight corners. my essilor lenses offer more than vision correction with three innovative technologies for my ultimate in vision, clarity and protection...

together in a single lens: the essilor ultimate lens package so, i can do more of what i love buy new transitions with select essilor lenses. choose a second pair of qualifying clear lenses... free with purchase of frames. see more. do more. essilor

♪ >> sean: the unhinged left is hitting new lows of hate delusion, and it gets worse every day. accusing ivanka trump of racism for getting her daughter a new

dog. the dog is white with blue eyes. can't we just be happy an 8-year-old kid is happy? we will never be the media mob. don't miss tomorrow night. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham is here. >> laura: i've got to say i want to be surprised by that reaction, but i'm not. if ivanka had gotten a brown or black dog, she would have been criticized for that, for dominating a dog that's black. do you know what i mean? she can't win back no matter what she does. >> sean: does that mean anything? my dog is a bernese mountain dog. mostly black, white. >> laura: very progressive of you. >> sean: progressive? i just like a big, beautiful dogs. i don't really care, just like i love people. i don't care who they are or where they came from. >> laura: do you have a designer dog? you used to have the cotton balm dog. what was it called? it was a beautiful dog. i loved that dog.