grab." it's available for pre-order now. sean will be back in the chair monday. "the ingraham angle" is next. thanks for joining us. >> laura: i'm laura ingraham. this is a special edition of "the ingraham angle" tonight. today's radical left is moving on many fronts. subverting and destroying our history, infiltrating our academic institutions and poisoning our culture. this is not hyperbole. the country that we love is in jeopardy. "the ingraham angle" is exposing it all. we begin with perhaps the most wide-ranging interview that a e antifa andy noe has ever done.

he was violently attacked by the masked mob in portland. >> [bleep], [bleep]. [bleep], [bleep]. [bleep]. >> laura: the journalist you just saw getting attacked by the masked thugs of antifa, these expose the group more than anyone in america today. he isn't lauded with awards or called courageous for any of his work in the conventional media circles. instead, he's brushed aside as just a provocateur or worse, inviting these attacks. that's my favorite. andy joins me now for a conversation about the origins of this group and their ultimate goal. thanks for being here, andy. i have a question that popped in my mind. does this affect you again to see that video? that is you getting hit and

kicked. what do you feel when you see yourself again in those videos over and over again? >> when i first started watching the videos of this, i was -- my first feeling was thank goodness part of it was captured on camera. at the same time, seeing myself being beaten up and humiliated with eggs, silly string and milk shakes being thrown in my face, it's painful to see. reliving that over and over. >> laura: i'm trying to put myself in your position. you're attacked, you're on camera. unless you had it happen to you, and i haven't, but i tried to put myself in your shoes. i've done martial arts training. how you react to that. unless you've trained to react to that, that is a horrific feeling. i don't care what they have in their hands. you feel like there's no way out. did you feel that?

>> yeah, i didn't know what was -- it took several hits to my head before i realize i'm getting beaten up right now. i've never been in a fight. i've never been arrested. i don't drink or do drugs. it's like i never encountered anything near it. when it happened, i think by the third punch was hoping and wishing that it stopped. it continued the. >> laura: why do they react to you the way that react to you? they see you and they think what? >> because of my writings. they're not just critical, it has an audience and a reach. i've written for the national journal and wall treat journal. i'm showing this other side of antifa that is frequently hidden or white-washed in liberal press. >> so you unmask them. >> yes. >> laura: as they're masked.

so that brings me to the next question. how did this start? is this the beginnings of a -- it's not street theater. this is the beginnings of what they hope to be a revolution in the united states. stoking violent confrontation, perhaps with police. ultimately leading others around the country because it's now all around the country. it's not just in one city like portland. is their ultimate aim and how did it start? >> a great question. a lot of the tension is paid to these incidents of the street hooliganism, which is one aspect of their tactics. more important, ideology which you mention. they're working towards a political revolution. these acts of violence and vandalism, they're meant to not only target citizens but meant to polarize society and delegitimize our institutions to

uphold the law, for example. they have a lot of hate. for law enforcements, border enforcement. you see reflected in their chants as where they target their acts of violence. >> laura: who inspires them? have you been able to get to the heart of that? which philosophical thinker, which revolutionary thinker. >> most of them call themselves marxists. i'm trying to understand and -- their ideology. this crystallized after 2016 after the election of donald trump. so there hasn't been much academic research until how are they organized, who writes their literature, what are their books of literature.

mark bray from dartmouth -- >> laura: i won't to dartmouth. he wrote the book on antifa. i want to play this for you, this is chuck todd's interview he did with mark bray to explain why the violence. listen to this. watch. >> when pushed, they resist the notion of turning to the government or turning to the police who we have seen have been infiltrated by white supremacists, the return to law and order of fascism. that does not -- it does dovetail into now what we're hearing from aoc plus three, that this is concentration camp, this is nazis, hitlerian. if hitler exists in the united states, you have to do everything you can to stamp it out. this is where this is going.

they say concentration camp and all hell breaks loose. he seems sympathetic to the group. >> he is. naturally he donates -- he has proceeds from his book go to antifa. that is a side point. antifa are masters of double speak. you can see anti-fascist. they're anything but. they appropriate words that mean one thing to one audience and dog whistle to their followers something else. >> laura: they seem like -- they seem fairly young. i see some older people in the crowd. to me they seem like a bunch of spoiled brat kids. i'm not trying to totally dismiss them. they think they're all noble. they seem fairly young. they go to college. is there a way to get embedded with this organization? what you need to do is have a

reporter go undercover. you can't do it now. in my day i would have. how do you make this cement milk shake. >> they do seem to draw from a wide age group. primarily young people. not all of antifa engage in street violence. some act as cop watchers, human shields, et cetera. i would say -- sorry. >> laura: i should tell everybody, that you're still suffering from this attack. i've had a chance to talk to you before. i've had my own share of medical issues over the years. i can still see that you're struggling a little bit for words. i can't believe you're doing as well as you're doing. you look good. i can see that you're struggling a little bit. that's fine. this is real life and we have to talk about the real world circumstances of what you went through and why this is not continue. how important is it for them to be called domestic terror

organization? >> i think that my escalation of the seriousness of what is happening might put pressure on authorities and federal authorities especially to start investigating them. there's so much we don't know. >> laura: what is next for you in this? you were badly injured. you're coming back. raising money for your medical bills and so forth, which i've gotten some good people to help on that score. what is next? how are you going to get by? >> it's been over three weeks since my beating and robbery in downtown portland. there's been no arrests. i'm lucky to have representation from harmeet dhillon. >> the best. >> laura: we set up a legal opportunity. we want to look in the evidence of what is a systemic issue in portland when it comes to policing and those politicians in governments potentially

withstand-down orders or turning a blind eye to far left militants. >> laura: we need to get to the bottom of this. they have immunity. it's qualified immunity for the police. they don't get full immunity. until you get discovery on what is really happening and discovery on this group, i don't think we'll be able to make much progress. i really don't. i think you're inspiring a lot of people. i will say it, i don't care who else doesn't, you're incredibly courageous. i wish i was younger and not as well known, i'd be out there covering it with you. i'm inspired by you. keep it going. >> thanks for having me. >> laura: come back soon. joining me now, harmeet dhillon. she's leading the charge to hold local authorities responsible for failing to stop these antifa assaults. now harmeet, before we get to the important issues, i have to

get your reaction to nancy pelosi and aoc's meeting on the hill today. after the meeting, pelosi said she didn't think that the two had many differences. wow! what is your reaction? >> my reaction is those that think that the aoc squad are a temporary blip are mistaken. it's clear that they are pushing the democratic party to the left. i watched that press conference and that photograph opportunity to see if there was any blinking and signs of a hostage situation. it's not nancy pelosi's nature to be that inflammatory. she's been pushed there. she's used the terms of "the squad" like the current octobcut of the white house. it's dangerous. >> laura: and we take them seriously. they're the thought leaders of the democrat party. but we move to antifa. i was so moved in my conversation with andy. i had not heard him speak the

way he spoke with me and i was very gratified to get his personal story and his background and everything he had been through. but you're leading this legal charge to hold these local authorities accountable. how important is it that this behavior, criminal behavior, is not allowed to go unpunished? >> laura, it's really critical. it's going to affect the outcome of elections. let me tell you about what i've been doing. we again to see this political violence in the streets that andy talked about dating back to the 2016 election. there was a major riot in san jose after then candidate trump spoke. the purpose of that was to intimidate trump supporters and prevent them from feeling coming out to vote. they succeeded. i heard from countless people saying they won't go to a political rally because they don't want to be assaulted. what is important about that, the mayor of san jose enabled that. we're seeing the same behavior

in portland. the mayor gave a press conference to explain and apologized for what happened there. >> laura: harmeet, let's hear from the mayor what you reference. watch. >> one of the things that i'd like the public to know is there is a unified incident command center that is engaged during these demonstrations. the incident commander's tactics are reviewed by internal legal counsel. i have never made a tactical decision and i most certainly did not june 29th. >> laura: harmeet, weasel words if i ever heard them. >> yeah, i'm trying to struggle for a politically correct response to that. it's nonsense what he just said. portland is unusual in that he's the police commissioner. he's a civilian command of the police in portland. so he may have been there, he may not have been there. it's irrelevant.

the assaults have occurred several times. the results have all been the same. no arrests except for -- certainly not the antifa people. >> laura: we're staying on this. harmeet, before we let you go, we have to put up the picture of keith ellison with an antifa leader that was there during the attack on andy ngo. he's supposing with him now. that individual, luis enrique marquez is an antifa top dog. he was -- he's in a photo there. looks like not an antagonistic photo with the attorney general of minnesota. keith ellison. >> right. on top of that, he's been seen at these antifa events in other states as well, this is a critical thing for your audience to understand that there are older national leaders that direct these efforts and then these young, easily led people. they're highly organized. they have attorneys, funding,

use social media to organize and disperse. this is very dangerous and a growing problem in america, lau laura. >> laura: harmeet, thanks for linking this to the 2020 elections. they're going to try to cordon off parts of the country that donald trump cannot campaign in and intimidate voters as well. and next on this special edition of "the ingraham angle," uncovering the face of the red call left. we go inside the extremist organization as there's new calls to label them domestic terrorists. stay there. i can taste your beer. i want to taste his beer. [ indistinct conversations ] samuel adams sam '76 -- finally a refreshing lager that you can taste.

>> laura: our next guest became involved in antifa in 2010 while just in high school. over the course of two years, he participated in several demonstrations throughout southern california. although he says he never hurt anyone, he yelled obscenities and destroyed property, which is a crime. while he walked away from the mow movement years ago, he's still following its growth and expansion. he's frightened by today's

antifa members that are more brutal and bolder than anything he ever experienced. gabriel joins me now. gabriel, why do you think the tactics of antifa have become more extreme and as we've seen really violent? >> i think they're mad that president trump is doing such a great job unfortunately. the left and antifa is just -- they don't stand for something. they really aren't standing against something. unfortunately what that somebody is somebody like president trump that likes american values. he likes the military, the police. he supports the constitution. antifa, they just want to destroy the constitution. >> laura: how close are they aligned to the american left and more liberal democrats? >> i think that antifa is just -- to know where antifa comes from, you have to look at

the college campuses. we have several professors from elite universities like dartmouth college -- >> laura: yeah, my alma mater. he wrote the book. >> yeah, the anti-fascist handbook. in this book he's supporting violence, advocating for violence. not only that, a significant portion of the proceeds of that book are going to antifa legal funds. to defend them and try to get them out of jail. >> laura: how did you become involved? you seem like a clean cut kid. you're a young guy. the world is your oyster. how did you get wrapped up with this group? >> again, in 2010, i wanted to go to a protest, make a difference. so i met a lot of them. when i met them, i thought i was doing some good. >> meet them online? >> no. i saw it online and i went to a protest. >> laura: you don't go to meet chicks. >> no. so after i went there though, i

got involved. i felt uncomfortable about the things that they were saying and doing. so i questioned them. they called me the fascist. i decided to leave and then i was introduced to the leadership institute. >> laura: yeah. a terrific organization. you look at what happened to andy ngo and we just heard from him on the show, he is such a soft-spoken guy. i don't think he's really political. but he is doing some of the reporting that other journalists refuse to do. >> yeah. >> laura: you see what happened to him. he could have been killed. he was badly injured. >> he could have. this is what i'm talking about. antifa doesn't stand for something. they're against everything. andy was trying to get the first

amendment out. so they attacked him. i'm sure that not everybody -- >> laura: the attack mentality. >> yeah. it's dangerous, too. >> laura: you mentioned the college campuses, this is where the mischief starts and parents don't know what their kids are doing. i want to get your reaction to this disturbing story out of texas. campus reform is reporting that incoming texas freshmen are being threatened with doxing, publishing their personal contact information if they joined conservative campus groups. apparently a self-described antifa student is behind this. >> yeah, the problem is these students have not done anything. if you consider joining a conservative organization, you'll get doxed. it was thanks to a campus reform that the university took it seriously. first they wanted to say they're not really our students. since campus reform reported on

the story, they reached out to the texas attorney general. this is what we have to do. it's not the only colleges. it's not just u.t. austin or dartmouth, it's all colleges. i'm excited. i'm going to do a college tour, speaking to college campuses. it's called "behind the black mask" so i can tell college students about how violence is never the answer. we should be talking, not fighting. >> laura: who else is wearing masks? we talk about the kkk, extremists. who else is wearing a mask? these great courageous warriors for marxism. they're such would you wards. >> yeah, the first time i went, they had masks. i wore one, too. if you wear a black mask, you're doing something that is not good. >> laura: i look forward to the campus tour. it's critical that people that

have been there and reported on it keep talking about it. a lot of the democrats just want to close their eyes and hopes this goes away. must be dealt with seriously. someone is going to get killed. an antifa member already got killed. someone else will get killed. thanks, gabriel, for being here and witness to this. two prominent gop senators introduced a resolution that could designate antifa as a domestic terror organization. it states antifa is a movement that intentionally combines violence with the group's alt left position. here's bill cassidy from louisiana. we have we not already done this? >> it's a close call because people on the left don't want to acknowledge it's an issue. they want to say it's rambunctious teens throwing barricades through windows. we're trying to elevate the

profile of the evil that it is. >> laura: we had christopher wray on capitol hill stating most of the domestic terror incidents have been perpetrated by white nationalists-type groups. i think the democrats will always point to that saying, don't blame us. it's the white nationalists. even the fbi director said that. >> don't tolerate them either. we on the right don't tolerate. the other hand, the left should not be tolerating antifa and should label them what they are. i would love to see presidential candidates condemn antifa for their assault on andy ngo. wouldn't that be great? >> we didn't have many. we had andrew, biden. a few. swalwell dropped out. a few days. i don't want to go near the salon, the favorite reading material and a piece that they wrote about your resolution. they said the move looks like an

attempt to saddle democrats declaring them against antifa or supporting it. alienating the party's supporters ahead of a critical presidential election. it's a shocker that salon might not have a big audience. >> think about it. they're assuming that antifa supporters are endorsing democrats. >> laura: just to understand what domestic terrorism is, the fbi's definition, perpetrated by groups, inspired by those with u.s.-based movements that ex-spouse extremist ideologies of a social, political, racial or environmental nature. >> jason: so they're involved in violent acts motivated by those general ideas. seems like it fits clearly. so how many people are

supporting your resolution? it's not legislation. it's a resolution. >> it's a resolution. right now it's cruz and me. we'll get other people on board. it should have it's profile elevated. you may recall a year ago, they surrounded a building in portland in which ice agents were doing their job. they were publishing doxing -- >> laura: it's going to get worse. >> the landlord came and threatened them with needles. it was tolerated by the mayor the whole time. >> laura: this is some of the media types that you've seen. almost normalizing antifa. watch. >> it says it in the name. antifa. anti-fascism, which is what they were there fighting. listen. no organization is perfect. >> there's certainly aspects of them that are true to a cause. that is a good cause. they want social justice. fighting hate is right. >> laura: senator, nobody is perfect.

no organization is perfect from don lemon. is that where it is now? >> to not look through this kind of facade of caring about other people, the fact that they want to beat up people to inhibit freedom of association or first amendment rights is a little mind-blowing. >> laura: yeah, gabriel was a member of antifa. he said they won't tolerate questions from within. that harkens back to the old soviet days of the young constables. you couldn't dissent from within. >> if you think cuomo and lemon should be about the first amendment rights and antifa is the righting to inhibit your rights, that should be offensive right there. >> laura: senator, we'll be tracking who does and does not sign on. this is extremely important.

thanks for your efforts. >> thank you. >> laura: up next conrad black breaks down how anti-americanism in academia is infecting today's democrat party. stay there.

>> a big win for the trump administration friday after the supreme court ruled that it can use pentagon money for border

wall construction. this lets a freeze on $2.5 billion placed by a lower court back in may. the funds will replace sections of the wall in arizona, california and new mexico. president trump praised the decision on twitter calling it a big victory. police in l.a. trying to figure out a motive behind a shooting spree that left four people dead thursday. investigators arrested the gunman. they say he called his father and brother and shot and wounded his own mother. the two other victims were shot at a gas station and a bus. police believe the gunman may be behind an attempted robbery. i'm aishah hasnie. now back to "the ingraham angle." ♪ >> laura: welcome back to this special edition of "the ingraham angle." tonight, we take you inside the

radical left's plot to undermine not just the rule of law but our traditions and our culture, too. the launching point for most of their subversive begins at universities and destroying patriotic symbols. it happened at colorado state university recently. a task force's traffic of an inclusive language guide deemed words like "america" and "male and female" as nonincluesive offensive teams. i wish i were joking. call this trend anti-american chic. patriotism on campus is considered passe. trashing the red, white and blue is considers edgy and courageous. the new voices on the left have taken it a step further by questioning the very ideals on

which this country was founded. >> this country was founded on white supremacy. every structure in our country reflects the legacy of slavery and segregation. >> the force that has come closest across american history to ending america was white supremacy. >> we as a nation have not truly acknowledged and grappled with racism and white supremacy that has taunted this country's founding. >> laura: joining me now, conrad black. great to have you on. when did academia stop being about learning and education and start being about indoctrination and anti-americanism? >> i think that to start with, we turned university to an anti unemployment scheme. my friend jordan peterson says, anything that studies at the end

isn't a real subject. there's astounding members at great costs in these universities studying subjects that aren't real and produce absolutely no possibility of generating an income that they can live on. they're essentially idle people and taught by underworked faculty. in that kind of an atmosphere, mischief arises. it coincides with a collapse of the international left and the political process of at tomization. instead of waving the flag around as is traditional, you have this search for subgroups that are victims. you encourage them in their victimhood. it becomes an echo chamber between the media, academia and the political operators in the democratic party, especially in their state of shock after their defeat by donald trump which they never imagined to be a conceivable result. so we have the results in policy

formulations in that party that propose tens of trillions of reparations for almost all nonwhites, open borders for everybody, we'll legalize abortion and insovereignty of a woman over her body. includes fully born and live infants. >> laura: these ideas, you don't have to be an expert in the university to be knowledgeable about how words and language are manipulated by the new radicals of the 21st century at college campuses. i just want to read something for you. this is at brown university. okay? one of our top universities in the united states. it says a history department course. it's called the history of fascism. what is fascism in theory and

practice. it says that this course will conclude with anti-fascism in the post war world and legacies of fascism in contemporary far right politics. you can imagine where that class is going to go. elevating antifa and linking the efforts to try to stop people like donald trump and the ideas of sovereignty, borders and culture and so forth. this is where the young radicals learn their less sons and marching orders. >> you're quite right. you have the deformation of history. someone like cory booker who is reasonably innocuous by the standards of most of these people saying that fighting climate change is like landing at normandy. they take iconic things from the past and attach them to nonsense in the present. it's an intellectual corruption that goes on. it's in pursuit in the case of

the politicians, the left, the democrats, to get onside with the trend. the trend is generated by the same sort of student mentality. i remember the people that are barbarians, the california universities, you get anarchy in universities that it's not too bad but it gets out of control when there are not counter forces. part of the problem here is the collapse of the morale and the believability and prestige of the traditional bipartisan political elite. bulldozed by trump from another side. so we're getting -- >> laura: in a melt down. >> yeah. a radicalization of the struggle here. the intellectual struggle. >> laura: today, pelosi met with aoc plus three, the modern day manifestation of the radical

left. she said basically there's very little difference between the two of us on major issues. that's all you need to know about how far left the democratic party is getting. >> two weeks ago they said they had five votes in congress. now there's not much difference between them. >> yeah. four votes. >> to some degree, the republicans and the president himself are pushing them into that corner because he knows that the people -- >> laura: it's smart. very smart of trump. conrad, thank you so much. it's great to see you tonight. also, biographer extraordinaire of nixon and fdr. ahead, bogus charges of racism to deflect from anti-semitism. we expose what they're up to when we come back. oh! oh! oh!

♪ ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7 and maintained it. oh! under 7? (announcer) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (announcer) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? (announcer) ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles.

do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) if eligible, you may pay as little as $25 per prescription. ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®.

>> laura: bogus charges of racism are among the preferred tactics of the new red call left. they charge white supremacy to demonize political opponents and deflect criticism of their own tolerance and anti-semitism. when nancy pelosi and the democrats considered a house resolution condemning the anti-semitism of a couple of the squad members, she got bullied into a watered-down version to include all hate. that concession by pelosi and her glowing comments about aoc plus three at this morning's

press conference shows us where the juice is in the new democratic party. and despite nancy pelosi saying she's a friend of israel, she's been loathed to distance herself from the legislation that omar and talib introduced. it was voted down two days ago, the progressive street and social media are rife with anti-israel sentiment today. here to react, a spokesman for the national conference or jewish affairs. rabbi, how concerned should american jews be about this growing anti-israel force within the radical left and seeping in to the democrat party? >> any self-respecting jew should be concerned. you know, back in the early part of march when we asked speaker

to condemn the blatant anti-semitism coming out of the mouth of omar, of ilhan omar and she refused to do it and she watered it down basically to condemn islamophobia as something worse than anti-semitism, that was a harbiner of things to come. if you call yourself a woman of color or call yourself a muslim woman, that you're i don't criticism. worse than that, you have a right to spew anti-semitism, anti-israelism, things that are anti-american and things that are very derogatory towards the founding fathers, american people, white people. you have a complete right to do that. but then somehow you have this immunity if someone rightfully criticizes you because they disagree with your particular point of view, your called

islamophobic or racist. we cannot tolerate or accept such a situation in america. not only does it take away our freedom of speech but will have no political conversation. >> laura: i need to play congresswoman talib from this week, rabbi, making this claim about a resolution condemning that boycott and divestment measure. watch. >> americans of conscious have long and proud history of participating in boycotts, specifically to advocate for human rights aboard. americans boycotted nazi germany. our right to free speech is being threatened with this resolution. >> laura: rabbi, how does she put condemning nazi harborism on attacking israel? what? >> listen, this is not about free speech. you can say whatever you want in this country. matter of fact, when people complain about donald trump

being authoritarian, there's more free speech coming from the theft than ever. the problem with the bds is they want the replacement, the destruction of the state of israel, a big difference between free speech as opposed to taking an action that has as its goal the destruction of a legitimate state. that is a jewish state and basically what they're saying they don't want jews as jews to have their own state enthough there's 57 islamic states. >> laura: thanks, rabbi for being here. a transgender activist is trying to destroy human decency by pushing the boundaries of businesses and conscious rights out the door, a feminist is here to respond when we come back.

>> laura: efforts to silence those with different points of view does not stop with antifa's violent attacks. i want to go to canada. a gender activist is harassing and threatening to shut down businesses. jessica is a biological males. she identifies as a transgender woman and traveling through

british columbia. she's been going to butte the salons that provide bikini waxing for women and demand that they provide him with a wax. the issue is that he has male privates and that salons have felt uncomfortable providing this service. end of story, right? go to another salon. wrong. she took them before the government where the government agrees that her human rights are being violated. so why is canada allowing this to happen? here's megan murphy. let's start with this. why is the court, it seems to be caving to these insane demands? >> well, i think that canada has been really at the forefront of

this gender identity fight. so we adopted gender identity legislation early on and have been creating policies surrounding these ideas for a couple years now. so it seems that many, if not most politicians in canada have accepted the notion that it's possible to identify as the opposite sex regardless of your physical body. >> which then runs right into the religious rights, cultural rights, conscious rights of others, especially women. in this case, we're going to get to the other problems that this individual has in the background in regards to other controversies in a moment. but the women involved in these 16 complaints filed by her, most of them are migrant women, correct? immigrants. they claim that this has

psychologically damaged them. they're getting threatened, harassing phone calls, e-mails. one has had to shut down her home business as a result. how is that women's rights? >> i believe a couple of them had to shut down their businesses as a result. you're right. he did specifically target immigrant women, women who didn't speak english as their first language. >> people have been banned from twitter for criticizing this gender identity crisis that you have in canada. it's come to the united states as well. but the feminism activist themselveses are being targeted because they're saying wait a second. wait a second. we did what we did to try to help and protect women. vulnerable women, women that want to start businesses. now their rights are butting up against this -- the perceived or

claimed right to be waxed at a particular salon by a woman even though you have male parts. people are supposedly pro science want to throw science out the window and have men compete in women's sports because they feel like they're identifying as a certain gender. they compete in women's sports and happening to my high school where i grew up in connecticut where the top runners in the state are now denied their top ranking because two men are running in these races and they're filing a lawsuit. so it hit this country as well. i want to read a tweet that she put out saying, this is not about waxing. this is about businesses and individuals using their religion and culture to refuse service to protect a group because they don't agree with it or the person and use that to illegally discriminate contrary to the b.c. human rights code and the

chrc. so in other words, no religious rights our cultural rights the rights to self-identify trumps all. >> how are these activists responding for example if somebody that was white wanted to identify as a person of color? you know, it's really offensive on many different levels. being a woman isn't about how you feel. it isn't about how you dress. it's about being born female. that's it. putting on makeup and changing your name to jessica doesn't make you female. i find it just really strange and appalling how many people are going along with this. >> laura: we don't have time to get to the right of parents who themselves have complained in the united states. these are feminists, conservatives, people in the middle saying our kids are being pushed into gender identity thinking just because a boy is creative or a girl is a tom boy.

this has to stop. final question to you is, do you have enough compatriots in the feminism world supporting you? >> i sure do. i mean, the reality is that the vast majority of people in the world support my view, which is again material reality. most people don't think it's possible to change sex. most people don't believe that women should have to allow strange men to enter into their homes and get naked so these women are obligated to wax their genitals. this tiny loud minority of people thinking it's a done deal. it's not true. >> laura: thank you. we'll continue to cover this on "the ingraham angle." >> up next, my final thoughts on

this new face of the red call left when this special edition of "the ingraham angle" returns. since you're heading off to school, i got you this brita. dad... i just got a zerowater. but we've always used brita. it's two stage-filter... doesn't compare to zerowater's 5-stage. this meter shows how much stuff, or dissolved solids, gets left behind. our tap water is 220. brita? 110... seriously? but zerowater- let me guess. zero? yup, that's how i know it is the purest-tasting water. i need to find the receipt for that. oh yeah, you do.

talk with your doctor to create a plan that works for you. go to loweryourhbp.org if i would've followed a treatment plan,

i would not be in this situation. >> laura: as we demonstrated tonight, the radical left is a growing threat to almost everyone of america's legal, political, academic and cultural institutions. it's easy to laugh off antifa thugs as basement dwellers or safe places on college campuses. that's how the left's perversion starts. as joke that nobody takes seriously until it's too late. that's why i take these radicals seriously and their effect on the democratic party and you should, too. that's all the time we have for this special edition of "the ingraham angle." check out my latest pot cast. go to podcast1.com and subscribe.

it's for free. have a great weekend. shannon bream and the fox news at night team take it from here. >> shannon: this is a fox news alert. a huge win for president trump tonight. the supreme court clearing the way for the administration to use pentagon funds for border wall construction. the aclu promises the fight is far from over. also breaking tonight on the immigration front, president trump says guatemala is getting on board with his plan to handle asylum seekers. and jerry nadler taking a major step in what he calls an impeachment investigation against the president. as nancy pelosi is fighting an uprising led by the progressives, including democrat soci socialists alexandria ocasio-cortez. the two met today. we have the scoop. welcome to fox news at