>> martha: that is the "the story." but as you know, the story goes on and on. we will see you back here tomorrow night. ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to come tell mark tucker carlson tonight. the democratic party wants to run the united states. both portland. no. they want to run the entire thing. all 50 states, all 3100 counties, all 320 million people. progressives want complete control of all of that. very much, including your neighborhood. that is their goal in the coming election. what will happen if they achieve that goal? we don't have to act dumb i

guess. we can assess the city they already have control over and have for a long time. if there is any country that you would like to run, it would have to be san francisco. it is a stunningly beautiful. it's a perfect climate. it has solid infrastructure. there is a well educated population. but more than anything, it has a lot of money. san francisco is one of the richest places in the world. how could you screw that up? and yet, take a look at what the left has done with san francisco. >> and some san francisco neighborhoods, hold your nose and watch your step. >> you see people lying on the streets. you see people pass out on the streets. you are seen people shoot up. you are seeing people eat out of garbage cans. >> take a look. people are dumping their used syringes into the street. piles like this are commonplace. most of the needles are handed out by the san francisco public health. with no reliable way to get them

all back, the city is spending $750,000 to hire people to pick up the needles. some 10,000 every month. >> tucker: bombay, india doesn't look like that. you would think it would be affordable, but it's the opposite. average rent for an apartment in san francisco right now is about $4,000. the city works only for the extremely rich. normal people, there's no place for them. want to raise a family in the city? good luck. san francisco now has more day care spaces for animals that it does for babies. it is literally a city without a future. it's people can't afford to reproduce. and san francisco isn't alone. the rest of california's single party cities are following suit. los angeles, for example, is now bigger than any city in the entire state of vermont. it's filthy encampments are filled with diseases.

more than war-torn countries. >> over time, squalor builds up on the streets, with rats feasting on rotting food mixed with sewage and used syringes. rats and fleas, typhus traveled through the streets. the attorney, who works way up on the sixth floor of city hall, got infected. >> i felt like i was going to die. >> greenwood said that the city has always had rats, but what hasn't changed is what's around it. >> the homeless population has moved closer and closer. they surround the building. so, as folks walk to work and back, they are walking through rotting food, raw sewage. >> tucker: typhus? what country is this? who did this? they did the same thing to sacramento. that's the state capital of california. it has gotten so out of control that ordinary people can barely live there. >> i just want to tell you what happens when i get to work. i have to clean up the and off

of my doorstep. i have to clean up the syringes. i have to fight off people that push their way into my shop that are homeless and on drugs, because you won't arrest them for drug offenses. i have to apologize to my clients. so i want to know what you're going to do for us, the ones that are unhappy. you want to make it a sanctuary state. you want to make it comfortable for everyone except for the people that work hard and have tried their hardest to get along in life. why you sit in your million dollar home and you don't have to look at what we are looking at, there are hardworking people out there who have to deal with us on a daily basis. >> tucker: it's a disaster, obviously. and yet, remarkably, cities around the country, are racing to copy california. washington, d.c., is now covered with tents and felt. drive around if you don't believe it. we have seen this before. for decades, americans fled cities to escape from chaos and

crime. finally, in the 1990s, crime fell. it became livable again. property values rose. poor neighborhoods got better. everyone benefited, and people started moving back. places that had been trekking for decades, places like washington and philadelphia, started growing again. it was a success. but that is going in reverse no now. among american's seven largest cities, san francisco has the highest property level crime levels. there are 70 car break-ins every single day. that is enabled by rapid. across the country, america's liberal cities side with the criminals. in dallas county, texas, for example, the district attorney

there is refusing to criminally prosecute thefts of less than $750. he decides that theft was of necessary items. he believes that american law enforcement is "systematically racist." so, he has stopped providing law enforcement at all. that is a category that includes burglary. not so low-level if you are the victim of that. they are not hard to predict. you know exact what is going to happen when you govern like this. in fact, it has happened. in 2018, philadelphia had its highest murder record in a decade. it has dramatically surged in a bunch of different cities with similar programs. chicago, baltimore, washington. but, no one on the left seems to notice any of this. in fact, they seem to approve.

do you want the rest of the country to be like san francisco? he joins us tonight. thanks a lot for coming on. >> thanks. >> tucker: i don't want to make this necessarily partisan, because they think there are a lot of democrats who look at the decay of our cities and say, i'm not for this at all. i may be liberal, but i'm not on the side of criminals. but you got to be honest and say that cities run, big cities run by the democratic party, for decades, in most cases are not doing while right now. what does that tell us question mexico while, tucker, it's not the democratic party. it's not even the progressives. if you go to marin county, for example, right across the bay, you are familiar with that area. that is a very aggressive area. you can't do all the things that you can do on the streets of san francisco. >> tucker: that's where the ruling class wins. they want to put up with any of

the scrap because they actually live there. >> joe: that's the exact same way. they are just to the south of us. so, north and south are the same way. the issue is that leadership in law enforcement and specifically in the prosecutor circles, we have a d.a. who is the absent father of the criminal justice system and san francisco. he announced that he wasn't going to run for reelection. he did that because he wanted to be with his mother in southern california. great. he has not shown up to work ever since then. if you look at what's happening on the street, if you are drug addicted or mentally ill, misdemeanors and violent felony is not happening in the presence of a police officer. go under the category of unenforced. it's just not enforced. you see it every day just walking down the street. riding your video right there. there is no crime.

>> tucker: everything you are saying of course, is true. but it's not just san francisco. i mean, there is a broader theme here. this is happening in washington, baltimore here this is happening in dallas. right. so, it's happening in cities run by people with a very specific mind-set. and that mind-set puts the rights of the criminal about the rights of the taxpayer. >> joe: that's right, but this is not democrats, progressive democrats. this is more of a socialist wing of the democratic party that has become louder and louder. i talked about this the last time i was on your show. these are the people that are going to cause trouble. these are the people that president trump is our day to stomach identifying our party with. if you agree in universal wages, that is not a democratic value. that is a socialist-communist value. >> tucker: i mean, i want to believe that the lunatics who are destroying your city, which

is the prettiest city, and portland, oregon, and other beautiful cities. i want to believe that they are minority. but how did they get in power? >> joe: are mirror is not that way. they are the problem. our mayor tried to get more cops to patrol. the legislation when it give it to her. she had to rush out and find money and ways to pay overtime to patrol union square. as you know, one of the most beautiful places, visited by all of the tourists. it's not our mirror. it's the legislator. it's the prosecutor who is out there, not enforcing laws. all you have to do is cross the street over into the city. they enforce laws there. that's the federal government. don't try and break a law that they are. and, by the way, what's unfair about this is that law abiding citizens, though working-class people, or if you are wealthy enough to own a car and not live

in it, all the laws apply to you. infractions, misdemeanors, that applies to you. >> tucker: but then they break into your car and they make no effort to find the guy who broke into your car. >> joe: unless you are a rod and your super wealthy. then, we are going to send the cops out to check your car. nothing's going to happen in there either, because the d.a. won't prosecute. >> tucker: it is a feudal society. thank you so much. good to see you. >> joe: good to see you. >> tucker: futile is exactly the word that joe kok and has used. he is author of the book "urbanism for the rest of us." thanks a lot for coming on. >> is my pleasure. >> tucker: so you noted the other day that san francisco has more drug addicts than it has

high school students. this is the kind of recognizable syndrome or cities become basically unrecognizable. >> it's been happening over the years. for a wild. while. a lot of old, middle and working-class neighborhoods were kind of undermined. now, you have really, the really primary cities of this country, populations of young hipsters who will stay there for a few years, poor people who are dependent on the welfare state and some very, very wealthy people. the middle class is literally becoming extinct, as is the family and much of urban america today. >> tucker: so, this is all kinds of implications, but the truth is, as you know is that most of our important policy decisions are made by people who live in these places, which are, as you just said,

clearly cut off by the concerns of normal people. completely cut off. how can you govern a country if you live in a place like this? doesn't it distort you? >> joel: i am a old democrat. i think that there were some great democratic mayors who helped turn around cities. so, it's not the politics. it's something that's happened. you look, let's say, at representative cortes' district. there is such low voter turnout. very small groups of people can actually win elections by being organized. what we have is that people are not engaging in politics. this is the sort of utilization that's going on. the middle and working class is just saying, "there's nothing we can do." we are just either going to

believe or we are just going to have to put up with it. >> tucker: angry affluent children get to make all the important decisions? >> joel: that's increasingly happening. you look in the city of chicago, where they are not electing socialists. you've got this group of people in their 20s, early 30s, who are very, very militant, and in many cases, they don't care that the schools don't work. that's a big issue two. you are seen here in california, that we have some wonderful charter schools, but they are under attack by the teachers union. well, if you are a 25-year-old hipster, living in orange county or l.a. county, what do you care about the charter schools? you are more concerned with getting the support of the teachers union. >> tucker: joel kotkin.

thanks a lot for joining us. you know what that means. it means that alexandria a casio cortez is calling another person in america a racist. we will tell you what it is. next. hey! i'm bill slowsky jr.,

i live on my own now! i've got xfinity, because i like to live life in the fast lane. unlike my parents. you rambling about xfinity again? you're so cute when you get excited... anyways... i've got their app right here, i can troubleshoot. i can schedule a time for them to call me back, it's great! you have our number programmed in? ya i don't even know your phone anymore... excuse me?! what?

i don't know your phone number. aw well. he doesn't know our phone number! you have our fax number, obviously... today's xfinity service. simple. easy. awesome. i'll pass. >> tucker: well, it turns out the u.s. customs and border protection may have allowed dangerous illegal immigrants to run free within this country for years. a federal law that would have let them be detected and

stopped. catherine harris. >> thanks, tucker. the border agency violated the block for nearly a decade and compromised public safety after failing to implement a dna screening program for illegal migrants. the agency's noncompliance with the law, accused of violent crime, including homicide and violent assault. immigration and customs enforcement. this is. government whistle-blowers last month who were behind the complaint peered under the law, they are required to collect information from individuals. the goal was to identify and then remove or prosecute illegal migrants whose dna matched open cases, from sexual assault, even

murder. they put a dna screening on hold and 2021. they said that homeland security had resource issues. eric agreed, but special counsel investigators sided with the whistle-blowers, that the waiver was never meant to be permanent. >> it's factual. since this law was passed ten years ago, u.s. citizens, lawful residents and others, have been, armed, and killed by people the cdp had in custody. in many respects, multiple occasions, did not collect the dna. they were released to commit harm again onto others. that is factual. >> in the last hour, fox news received this statement from a homeland security official, confirming that he has no

directed homeland security to finally move forward on the dna collection program. >> tucker: catherine harris. thanks a lot for that. congress woman, alexandria ocasio-cortez has been in congress for 38 months. she feels confident that prior to her arrival was a mistake. a new video on instagram, ocasio-cortez takes aim at the college. >> we are coming to you live from the electoral college. when he people i can't think of any other way? can you? >> tucker: you may think that the electoral college has worked pretty well for almost two and a half centuries, electing democrats and republicans. best country.

watch, ocasio-cortez knows better shoes woke, so she knows that the electoral college is, wait for it now. racist. she accuses the electoral college of having a . the daily briefing with dana perino, one of our favorite guests. thanks for coming on. very quick question as someone who has followed american politics for many years. is the electoral college racist? >> dana: it's such a disservice to the institution, . it's bad for civics education. think of how many people follow her on instagram and think, oh, yeah. to the electoral college is racist. because she drives through a rule area of the united states,

she's driving through flyover country, she think's it's okay to say that these people don't matter. the people that live here don't matter. while, we know that there are rule parts of the country. there are urban centers. there all of these things. nobody said it was racist until recently. they didn't say it one barack obama won the electoral college twice. the other thing is, when she talks about this, not wanting the electoral college, it's just the next step to saying that they don't want the united states senate either. they don't want things right. they just want the cities, of which you just highlighted in your a block, to be in charge across the country. they don't want to have to persuade and use argumentation to say why their policy prescriptions would be better. i am on the electoral college

traditionalist and evangelist for the electoral college. i would be happy to debate anybody about this. i feel that strongly that the founders knew it they were doing when they set it up. minority rule is, i'm sorry, majority rule is not what we are set up to have. we are a republic. we had the electoral college, and in fact, colorado passed this law, saying, okay. we don't even care what the electoral college says. we are just going to do whatever the popular vote is. guess what, today, u.s. appeals court in denver said, not so fast. that doesn't work in our country. i also think it's futile what she's doing. the electoral college is not going to change in our lifetime. they want you just said that you would be happy to debate anyone on the question of the electoral college. she doesn't, and people like her don't. they seek to take the question off of the debate table by calling it racist, in other words moral. in other words, your position

isn't even worth hearing because you are a bad person, because you are racist, because you support a racist institution. what does that due to our public discourse? >> dana: it's growing, because i think eight of the democratic candidates for president in 2020 all support getting rid of the electoral college. but that's a lot a lot. imagine how many people are out there hearing that the electoral college is the vein of their existence? she said that this would silence voters and voices in iowa. that certainly is not the way to win back the white house if you think you want to win. this is a system that they are going to have. i think it's a good system, but i do think that it is a disservice to say it should be abolished without acknowledging that it actually has a purpose. >> tucker: right. exactly. to deride it, dismiss it as immoral. >> dana: lincoln won the

election because of the electoral college paired he was not racist. >> tucker: dana, thank you so much. here is another glimpse. that is a left-wing news and politics broadcast. here is his description of why 9/11 happened. watch this. >> america deserve to 9/11, dude. we totally brought it on ourselves, dude. holy [bleep]. how is anything i'm saying controversial? >> tucker: 3,000 americans died on their way to work. americans deserve to 9/11. you may be shocked to hear that, but you really shouldn't be, because the united states in sis immoral. the united states is a sinful country that should be destroyed. that is basically the case that they are making day in and stay

out. attacking the country. is it a shock that somebody just finally came out and set it? u.s. deserved 9/11. thousands deserved to die. you shouldn't be shocked to hear that. well, bernie sanders is about to unveil his new climate plan. only two things about it are searching. it might make your life less pleasant. we will tell you what he has in mind for you after the break. is a fox nation is a member's streaming service. it's all there. it's worth taking a look at. you can do it right now. hope you will (woman) somebody would ask her something and she would just walk right

past them because she didn't know they were talking to her. (deborah) i just could not hear. i was hesitant to get the hearing aids because of my short hair, but nobody even sees them. (avo) our nearly invisible hearing aids are just one reason we've been the brand leader for over 70 years. (deborah) when i finally could hear for the first time, i started crying. i could hear everything. (avo) call 1-800-miracle to start your 30 day risk-free trial and schedule your free hearing evaluation today.

>> tucker: well, looks like new york mayor built a valid . nobody wants to vote for him, but he will not abandon his campaign. thanks to a technical error, it sounds like he's taking a hit of helium to join the cast of alvin and the chipmunks.

>> we are passing legislation this year to guarantee working people, like everyone else, to guarantee working people. two weeks paid vacation every year. that's the kind of thing that would transform people's lives. >> tucker: maybe it was plan. after all, the amount of people who would want to vote for a chipmunk is probably larger than the people who want to vote for de blasio. try to burnish his credentials by preaching to a historically african-american neighborhood. guess how many african-americans showed up to see pete buttigieg. as he railed against systemic racism, you looked around, and nobody was even there.

instead, the place looked like a subaru dealership in cambridge. guilty white liberals as far as the eye could see. you could have served avocado toast. it was that pale. actually, black people appeared to be boycotting the event. they had better things to do. good for them. bernie sanders is set to talk about his green deal. a lot of proposals that will make your life worse. because, we face an existential threat. >> climate change is real, it's an existential threat to our country and the entire planet. >> of the biggest existential threat is climate. >> climate change. it really is the existential threat. >> we are going to have to address the most existential threat to foreign nation in the world. climate change. >> climate change, the biggest existential threat that we face. >> we need to treat global

climate change like the existential threat that it is. >> we are facing a climate crisis. it represents an x essential threat to who we are as human beings. >> tucker: [laughs] i mean, they be climate change is an existential threat. i'm certainly open-minded. but if it is, then why do none of the democratic responses seem very serious? none of them seem to be, for example, see seem to fly on private aircraft, which every single one of them does all the time. they shut down the entire u.s. economy. first, it was a ban on plastic straws, plastic bags. they recommended that people set their thermostat to 83 degrees at night for the sake of stopping global warming. okay, you first. he joins us. thanks a lot for coming on

tonight. so, there is this weird disconnect between the nature of the threat, which is terrifying. it's godzilla, basically. it will destroy all of us. their proposals, which are petty and small, and disconnected from science. >> they are. in fact, the best quote was that even if we face to the climate catastrophe that we faced, the green new deal would not have any impact on the climate. it's pure symbolism when it comes to the climate. that's what's so shocking. the green new deal is nothing more than the same solutions they were paddling in the 1960s and 70s. the resource scares. limited resources scare. it's the same exact solution. all they are losing is that

global warming has the same scare. >> tucker: so, actual scientists have noticed, obviously that if you are worried about carbon, that you should plant more trees. there is zero interest from these people in doing that. by the way. it would make the country. they have no interest in that? why? >> mark: no. arnold schwarzenegger, climate champion, big champion of the big new deal. he proposed to californians, as governor in a video addressed to the states, that they should air dry their clothes on a hanger for six months on the clothesline in order to reduce their carbon footprint. at the same time, he was flying a jet. he daily commuted, but told californians that they should

have air drying clothes. the same state, by the way, in california, mentoring energy saving, proposed emergency control over people's thermostats in 2008, in order to control the energy flow of california. even "the new york times" balked at this. the government wanted to take over thermostats. there was such outrage, they stop that. that's a problem now we are facing with these energy starter regulations. it's a creeping thing. what is voluntary now is going to be mandatory under the green new deal. >> tucker: so, why wouldn't republicans, and i doubt their clever enough to think of this on their own. but why when it some sponsor legislation that bans the use of private air travel for people who are concerned about, or how about all private air travel? to see who votes for it? >> mark: that would be a fantastic idea.

even trump administration, cabinet members are silent. trump is the only one who really wants to speak and push back on this agenda. that's part of the problem. they want to talk about the regulatory impacts, but they don't want to go at the heart of it. with that idea, it's a fantastic idea, because it would expose them. bernie sanders himself, even hillary staffers talked about how much he demanded that the campaign had to be on private jets. he spent millions on private jets during his 2016 campaign. >> tucker: they are lecturing the rest of us who dare criticize al gore for having the largest house in the state of tennessee and flying back and forth on a private plane. we were the bad ones were noting that. >> mark: it's nauseating, but it's not going anywhere anytime soon. he's taking a yacht across the atlantic, because she doesn't want to fight. first of all, the yacht is made

out of carbon fiber. but they are going to have to fly the crew back to you europe. there are going to be all sorts of flights. >> tucker: mark, great to see you tonight. >> mark: thanks a lot, tucker. >> tucker: while, bill gates, the millionaire, has connections to jeffrey epstein. it's pretty fascinating, actually. plus, supporter of hillary clinton, says she's smearing him with lies, and she's fighting back.

>> tucker: here's an amazing story. a former advisor to bill gates, has been named as one of the executives of jeffrey epstein's

will. chief breaking news correspondent, gallagher joins us tonight. thanks for joining us. >> part of the baffling history of jeffrey epstein is how he somehow was able to surround himself with some of the world's most powerful people, even after he pled guilty to soliciting and under aged. two years after epstein served jail time. and now, we are learning microsoft founder, bill gates spoke to him on more than one occasion. he also flew on epstein's private plane from new york to palm beach. though gates reportedly refuses to say why. it was allegedly used to fly underage girls to epstein's private island. they wonder why one of the world's richest men would need to take advice from a convicted sex offender, especially

considering what melinda gates and bill do for people around the world. he was named of three executives of his will. 49-year-old boris said he was shocked to learn that epstein named tim and says he has no intention of fulfilling the duty. bill barr gave an impromptu news conference today, where he claims that there were in numerous irregularities in the death of jeffrey epstein. but, he says so far, he has been given no reason to question the findings of the medical examiner, who ruled his death a suicide. the investigation is moving forward. tucker. >> tucker: what a story. chris trace gallagher thank youo much. he has also been a major critic of google. one of the smarter critics of google. he has argued that the company's

bias may have boosted hillary clinton in the 2016 election. that's not just something he thinks. he has amassed quite a bit of research that it's true. a political spat between tillery clinton and president trump on twitter. clinton bashed him and his work. he has long been a supporter of the clintons, but he says that her recent behavior has been "shameful." doctor, thanks very much for coming on. now, i just want to restate, as you've told us a number of times, you are not a political conservative. you have actually been a fan of hillary clinton. tell us how you asus her response. >> tucker: first of all, president trump made a couple of minor errors in his tweets, in which he was referring to my testimony before congress a few weeks ago. so, okay, he made some minor

errors. but, what hillary clinton did, to be honest with you, i think she should be ashamed of herself. she told some blatant lies, and i happen to know that the information that she got came from google. >> tucker: well, that should give us pause. basically, what you are alleging is that hillary clinton is carrying water for google. you >> robert: there's no question about it. if you just look back in time a little bit, you'll find that her number one donor in 2016 was alphabet. google, her chief technology officer was a former google executive. offered in writing to head up her tech campaign and then set up a secret organization called the groundwork. the sole purpose was to put her into office. i have been a staunch supporter

of the clintons for decades. i literally have a signed letter from bill clinton over my desk on the wall, and i cannot believe that she did this. the things she is saying are just absurd. >> tucker: so without getting too technical, i mean, you are a research scientist. but give us a sense of how she's lied about it. >> robert: number one, she says that my work has always been found to the very highest standards of scientific integrity. i am the only one who has done them so far. the purpose of those, of course, is to capture what a big tech companies like google are showing people on our screen. she says, and here's the second live. she says that my entire monitoring project in 2016 was

based on 21 undecided voters. actually, my discovery of the bias that occurred, the pro clinton bias that occurred in google search results. not yahoo. just google. that analysis came because i preserved 13,207 election related searches. and the 98,000 web pages to which the search results link. this is a very sophisticated analysis. the first of its kind. i did even a bigger project in 2018. also, with startling results. i am heading towards setting up a much, much larger system in 2020, that will look at all kinds of things, bias in newsfeeds and twitter.

shadow vanni spin when i just o say for the third time that thes of your research contravene your own pip dell my political beliefs and you publicize them anyway. thanks for coming on. >> thank you sir. >> tucker: chinese lab is working to create human primate hybrids. all the things that could go horribly wrong for mankind. that's why with dell small business technology advisors. you'll get tailored product solutions,

expert tech advice and one-on-one partnership. call an advisor today at 877-buy-dell. ♪

>> tucker: earlier this month, news broke that researchers in china have created a human monkey hybrid embryo.

seriously. now, officially, scientists say they hopefully will be able to grow new human organs on demand. the question is, what could go wrong? dr. mark seger is our guest. give us a quick overview of what they are trying to do and why? >> the salt institute in california flies over to china, and he knows he's going to be able to evade regulations, tucker. that's a big part of this. he takes a monkey embryo and infuses it with human stem cells, saying he is going to be able to use organs that could be used in the future for transplant. there is no ethics involved. do you know what the worst thing is? scientifically, it's impossible, because monkeys are too small. if so even if you were able to grow a life monkey with human stem cells, you wouldn't have organs that are usable.

it's a disgrace. i want to say up top, that i don't believe the scientist should be able to conduct research in the united states. we have seen enough of this from china already, and it's not the direction, never mind, throwing stem cells away on useless science. we are creating monstrosities out of this. those monstrosities could not grow into full hybrids. we are nowhere near the technology. but in the future, we could see science fiction out of this. in the meantime, it's an utter disgrace. >> tucker: so, you're saying, it's basically quack science. >> dr. marc: i want to show you what the real science is, by the way. at nyu, we are taking pig organs, and we are humanizing them, using genetic engineering. not embryos. not embryonic stem cells. literally, they can overcome immune problems making organs that we can use.

monkeys are not useful in this regard. again, it's absolutely disgraceful. i don't believe we should be conducting this kind of research. >> tucker: that's a strong statement, coming from a physician. it raises the question of the amount of biotech that's being funded right now in the united states, particularly in asia, china. it's not regulated at all. at some point, if you've got people tampering with the basic building blocks of life, do you risk, a real tragedy could happen. >> dr. marc: i think that's going to happen in the future. that's a great point. this horrible research is coming out of spain. it's crossing over to the united states. then it's going to china. right now, we have a lot of problems and a lot of differences between species. even among primates. but in the future, we could see a science-fiction movie out of this, where we create a monster, where we create a monkey that has a human thought.

that is the last direction we want to be going in. that's horrible. that is the kind of science we don't need. to wake up in a planets, decades in the future, and you know the movie i'm talking about, where the person who is talking to us isn't a person. this is an absolutely monstrous thing. this science. again, we have real science. this isn't it. we need to use the beings that are the same size as humans that have useful organs that we can use. not monkeys. stay away from monkeys. >> tucker: boy, i've been on tv a long time. i don't think that i've spent 3 minutes calling for the regulation of anything. but if they are going to regulate anything, it's this. it has consequences. the consequences are potentially overwhelming. just before the united states should not allow the staff to going, go on it all. >> tucker: we are out of time. we will be back tomorrow night. 8:00 p.m. the show that is the sworn and totally sincere hannity, of

lyon, a paucity, smugness, and rude things, all of which are in overabundance right now. good night from washington. guess who's next? sean hannity. live from new york city. >> sean: well, i am glad that you are sincerely against those things. i am totally b.s. he knew. but, sincerely. buckle up. another busy news story from hannity. all right. the 2020 race heating up. democrats are melting down. you've got this far left presidential, radical candidates. they have failed to impress any american voters. the so-called front runner, sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle joe, now embarrassing himself daily. you've got bernie sanders, elizabeth warren. their policies would transfer america into venice by.