ones will never, ever be forgotten. [silence] ♪ >> tucker: good evening, welcome the you canner carlson tonight. they were two special elections in the state of north carolina, both of them billed as close races last night n the end republicans won both of them and they won handily. in the more competitive race in the ninth district dan bishop finished substantially better than the last republican who ran during the mid terms, just ten months ago. what does that tell us? tell on twitter the debate is about donald trump always it always is. how much should his rally influence the jut come of the e sflex no question it did influence it. positively. helped the republicans. but there's another factor at

play here, that's received far less attention. the democratic debates. the de bath have been televised. that means the rest of the country gets to hear what leading democrats actually believe. it turns out that's been >> a plane crashed into the terrifying to many people. we give you examples of this but world trade center. >> we were ordered to land. >> a horrible, horrible time. we start with this. how many people do you have to we were there. of those people took care of us. survey at the mall, park, any public place, and ask people how many would you have to talk to before you found a single person >> ♪ who supports giving free, tax-pair funded healthcare to >> tucker: every year like foreign nationals who snuck into clockwork tuition rises at our country and living mere illegally? you have to talk to a lot of american colleges but standar people before you found some one now at american university in in favor of that. almost nobody in america northwest washington where thee. supports that. and for good reason, it's nuts, and not something we can afford. nd yet all of the major professors are instructed to democratic candidates say they grade student's essays on their do support it. watch this. effort and not on the quality of >> so you will support giving their work. why? it's being done in the name of universal healthcare, immediate you care for all, to people who are in the country illegally? promoting anti-racist language. >> let me be very clear, i am

opposed to any policy that would deny in our country any human "white language supremacies is being from access to public safety, public education, or perpetuated in college public health, period. >> do you believe that classrooms particularly in undocumented people should have grading writing." healthcare in this country? >> i think undocumented people what a joke! nicholas is a professor of need to have a means by which they can be covered when they're sick. politics and the host of a people need, this is common decency. >> raise your hand if your plan sports pod cast. thank you very much for coming would provide coverage for undocumented immigrants? on. white language supremacy is [applause] >> tucker: uh-huh. if you're middle class person saying we won't teach the kids who can barely afford to get because it's too hard and fit, struggling as some one to painful. this is a prevalent attitude. pay the premiums on your health do you notice its effects as someone teaching kids every day? insurance, imagine what they're telling you. >> what we have seen is the they're saying that people who aren't from here who have no collapse of the entire american right to be here, are breaking ? education system. in my classroom, we have kids take the citizenship exam on the

that's just the beginning. zarious other times the first day of lass. democratic candidates said they every student failed that exam. want to put hundreds of thousands of criminals on the streets. they brag about decriminalizing >> tucker: every student failed all illegal border crossing. the test? >> it asks who is the speaker of embrace the form of identity the house? politics and gender theology. what branch of government is they roontlessly attack america this? everyone failed. then it gets better. as evil and describe a person's i give them the united states work as de find by gender and constitution to read. skin color the open 1i689 only it's not the united states american dream. they have endorsed taxpayer constitution. it's the russian constitution. funded abortion up to the moment of wirth. i replace russian federation is >> some one asks you united states and they write 2 specifically, specifically about third trimester abortions and paragraphs. only 3 students were able to you said that's the decision identify that it wasn't the united states constitution. left up to the mother. so my question is this, i was so, my students are coming into born september 8, 1989, and i college with no knowledge of want to know if you think on september 7, 1989 my life had no american government. how can you appreciate america if you don't know america? i researched and found the value? >> of course i don't think that. largest on-going assessment of and of course i'm glad that you're here. this is a decision that neither

you nor i nor the united states government should be making. graduating seniors. that's a decision for the woman 11% proficient in american to make. >> tucker: any democrat and history. there are some who urge the and 24% proficient in writing party to focus on the practical and 19% in geography. concerns of mainstream merges, anyone that says that is treated they are going into college and like a leper, uncleej. their average on all subjects is they're met with total silence or worse get a wlek tur from 22%. we have dumbed down the elizabeth warren. standards. the system collapsed. >> why do democrats win when we nobody wants to talk about it. run on real solutions not nobody wants to sound the alarm impossible promises? when we return on things that bells. we are teaching kids how to take are bourquable, not fairy tail a test. that's not a life skill. xwhix. >> i don't understand why anybody goes to all of the rather than teaching them knowledge and how to apply that trouble running for. knowledge in the real world. united states towns talk about what we really can't do and that's why you see this bonehead shouldn't fight for. professor who makes in claim [ applause ] it's about race when it is not. it cuts across all races. >> tucker: moments like that it doesn't matter if you are kill on twitter. all the twitter people love it n rich or poor. >> tucker: we are turning these real life they're a sure fire kids loose into a world they can't compete in.

way to lose votes. americans don't hate america. it's cruel what we are doing. they know we're not a racist >> would you call a plumber that country that needs to be rebuilt from the ground up. is only 22% proficient? most americans are cheerful and >> tucker: no. moderate. and the polls show it. this is the future of the country. you are on the front lines of npr prol from two months ago it. found less than 30% of americans professor, one of the great few wanted to decriminalize border professors we are proud to have crossings. on the show. it turns out you didn't make us 41% wanted to replace private feel better, but we are glad to health insurance with medicare for all. know the truths. a poll found only 18% of another hour has gone. we will be back tomorrow night americans agree with beto that abortion ought to be available and every night at 8 p.m. for any reason up until birth. in other words, the democratic eastern time. the show that is the sworn enemy party is almost perfectly in sirng with the population of of lying, pomposity, smugness martha's population, martha's and group think. dvr it. vin yard. in the meantime have a great night with the ones you love and they're out of contact with the stay tuned for sean hannity live rest of the country. it's why they lost last night and they'll lose in november from new york city. unless they move to the center >> john: thanks. fast. brian dean wright is a former cia officer, a democrat. -->> sean: welcome to "hannity." thanks for coming on. it was 18 years ago americans

you watch the claims and the faced the worst attack on american soil in the history of promises and the boasting of our great country. democrats at these debates. a group of evil islamic and compare them to the polling terrorists turn planes into on the issues. and it's almost as if they're weapons of war. trying to tank their own party. what do you think is going on 2,977 innocent men, women and here? >> a year ago, we had an children were murdered in a advantage, democratic party had a substantial advantage over the single day. republican party in terms of the the bravest of the brave, the generic ballot n the past year that's collapsed. let's ask the question, what has happened in the past year that first respond ors went up. would make that change? we know what happened. they rushed into those burning we've had the party of aoc and towers to battle the flames. the squad, promising nothing but socialism and anti-semitism. we have hysteria. a russian in every closet. trump is a traitor. the policy solutions that we're oferk. they're not real. the green new deal isn't rule. trying to ban car parts and straw -- cow farts. we have a multitude of issues that have happened over the past

year, chuck and nancy saying we're a big pen, come in. and you are now seeing the ramifications of that. there's another fantastic poll, npr, they discuss the very fact that biden, warren, all of the major candidates, in fact all of the candidates have less popularity in the country than they do unfavorability. they are, no better than trump. what does that tell you in terms of what's happening in the democratic party? we aren't an alternative to the president, we're an embarrassment. that's a sequence of hooking your wagon, ocasio-cortez and her merry band of idiots. that is the consequence. >> tucker: it's a predictable one, of course. i think ocasio-cortez has things about her that are impressive, she's bold anyway. and she gets credit for that from me. but it's clear when you listen to her that she's way out of the mainstream, most americans don't understand what she's saying, she doesn't understand what she's say ychlgt would an adult

allow some one like that to determine the direction of the party? i'm confused. >> in north carolina they lost in the rural parts of that district. that's places where i come from in rural america. why is it that they think she's crazy, and mckree, frankly was moderate guy, marine, pretty moderate voice, the reason that the national democratic brand is tarnished and tarnished because of the aocs, omars, and the calebs and the rest of them. until we stop the rest of them and say we have a spine because we want and believe in a different kind of country, we're not going to fall for any of the silliness on the progressive side of the party, we'll stand up and offer an alternative. we want to give people a chance to vote for the party. not just against trump. we have had this for years. vote against obama, vote against bush. it's enough. people looking for something different and democratic party

isn't giving it right now. >> tucker: do you think it's helpful considering that we're in an election cycle right now, to blow up the democratic congressional campaign committee, the people running it are the wrong skin color? that happens. seems like a line particular thing to do. how do they do that? >> if i can answer that question my friend, perhaps i would lead the party out of the doldrums, i don't know. pelosi and schumer have led this party into the gutter. only reason we're competitive at all is because trump is so combustible to so many. and i think once the president is gone i think you'll see a very different electorate saying no thanks democrats, looking for something different. >> tucker: amazing. brian, thank you. pleasure. so the macro picture is that at? point over the past 30 years the party moved from the historic position as the party of the

working man and became utterly and completely the party of guilty rich kids. no living person personifies this shift more perfectly than robert francis beto owe roarke the product of a sinkle sex boarding school and columbia university. when beto o'roark speaks he speaks for everyone, all of the liberal work his happiest denouncing his country as racist and lecturing about privilege. just the other day beto explained when he's president he'll make sure that poor people move in right next door to you. >> here's a tough thing to talk about. though we must. rich people are going to have to allow, or be forced, to allow lower income people to live near them. which is what we failed to do in this country right now. what if if as we proposed to do we invested in housing closer to where you work, very often mixed income housing, the wealthiest are living next to those who are

not the very wealthiest in this country to make sure they can both afford to go to the same b >> tucker: sounds like a great plan. the best part of the plan of course is that beto himself has no intention of participating in it. no one is going to put section 8 housing or homeless shelter next to beto's house. there's no way his kids are going to high school with a bunch of poor people. literally no chance of that happening. the real point of beto's plan isn't to bring rich people like himself back to earth, the point is to deny normal people the trite control their own lives. beto would like to force middle america to be charitable. here's the interesting thing. amazingly beto has exempted himself from that requirement. we know this for a fact because we have his financial cities closures. beto and his wife gave a total of just 0.3% of their income to charity in 2017. that's not just low by national

standards, it's worse than that. it's disgusts. incredibly stingy and selfish. and yet beto seems totally unembarrassed about it. he was asked by a reporter and he explained that his mere existence is a form of charity. >> i served in public office since 2005. i do not stop contributing to the success of my state or my country. there are way do is this that are measurable and ways that i do this immeasurable. there are charities that we report to that we've tellized others we donate to that we have not. i'll tell you, i'm doing everything i can, spending this time with you, not back home in el paso, because i want to sacrifice everything to make sure woo that we meet this moment of truth with everything that we have got. >> tucker: so running for office is my form of charity.

that's what he's telling you. imagine saying something like that. he's polling below 5%. democrats ought the pray that he drops out very soon. every time he opens his mouth some one, somewhere, decides to vote for donald trump. sdem cattic party doing everything it can to keep chelsea gabbard off the debate stage. she joins us to talk about that next. remembering the victims of the september 11 attacks on this country. more after the break.

>> tucker: hard to believe it's

been that long but today marks the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. if you remember what happened that day you remember it vividly. almost 3,000 people died. you might think they were killed by extreme interests but you're a backward simple fng. the "new york times" says no. they tweeted, 18 years have passed since airplanes took age and brought down the world trade center. today families are once begin gathering at the site where more than 2,000 people died. airp t aim? did omar write that? she could have. some airplanes did something. but the times remembers the attack at all. cnn tried to distract its audience with a brand new narrative, it just made up. on the morning show, a guy called john aslan explained it, right wing terrorisms it the real threat. yeah, this after 9/11 and how sands of troops we lost in the war since it started.

take those out and it's not a problem at all. cnn's name for the segment was "9/11 amnesia" describing it self, clearly. 9/11 played a critical role in the lives of so many americans, certainly in the life of congresswoman tulsi gabbard of hawaii, joining the military after it a tack and served a tour in iraq, now she's running for president. congressman gabbard joins to us talk about 9/11. thanks a lot for coming on congresswoman. >> thank you. . >> tucker: looking back you have had time to think about this in the country and abroad. what are the lessons for the rest of us would you say 18 years later? >> it's looking back on that day, remembering where we were, and as we observed al qaeda attacking us, seeing thousands of fellow americans killed on that day, and seeing the brave acts that these heros, first

responders, put forward as they ran into those crumbling buildings as people tried get out to see how many people they could save. like so many americans, it was this event that made me decide in my own life i wanted to dedicate my life to keeping the american people safe, too. finding and defeating those who attacked us on that day, and protecting our freedoms. this is something that continued to inspire me today. but also, we've got to recognize how much our leaders have failed us. where instead of focusing one pointedly on defeating al qaeda and affiliates and offshoots, instead they went and started waging a series of regime change wars in places like iraq and libya and the ongoing regime change war in syria. now, this has cost our country trillions of taxpayer dollars. we have lost thousands of

american lives in these wars miechlt brothers and sisters in uniform. to speak of the countless lives lost in other countries in the middle east. where do we find ourselves today? al qaeda is stronger now than they were on 9/11. this is the result that we have. >> tucker: so, i have to say, i'm completely convinced that if you would leave the line about syria out, if you present tend that what we're doing in syria and have done in syria is wise and smart, that you would be on the stage with your fellow democrats at the debate. bringing that you point about syria has earned you the even mitt of a lot of people in washington, a lot. the entire foreign policy establishment. >> you know what is so interesting, tucker, if you look back around the vote for the iraq war, you know, there were some folks, very few folks who voted against that iraq war. and they were smeared, they were accused of hating america, they

were called unpatriotic. and all of a sudden, now, we are where we are today. it's become vogue for politicians to say how terrible that iraq war was. yet they lack the courage to stand up and speak the truth today against the ongoing regime change war in syria. that's not leadership. >> tucker: no, it's certainly not. so, how do you feel about being excluded from this next debate? >> the dnc is trying to basically send a message to the american people that they are the all powerful gate keepers and they're the ones who have the power to decide who should be considered to be our democratic nominee or not. but the reality is that voters in this country have that power. that's where i'm focused, i'm focused on reaching out the and connecting with voters.

they're the ones i'm committed to serving. >> tucker: you think that a party that believes in diversity would like to have maybe a different point of view on the issue. you have a different point of view some of the issues. >> i think that's part of the problem, with these debates, is with these 30-second answers, 60-second answers, you aren't really giving voters the chance to hear where do we stand on these issues, what motivates us why are we doing what we're doing, what experience and credibility do we wring to the job of president and the huge responsibility as serving as commander in chief. really all it becomes is an opportunity for the hosting media network to get high ratings or make some money off of it. the whole thing is a charade. and it doesn't serve voters. that's the biggest problem. >> tucker: congresswoman tulsi gabba gabbard, thank you. >> thank you. >> tucker: 18 years since 9/11

as we said. many facts about what happened on 9/11 remain hidden remarkably. many seeking justice. almost all of the 9/11 hijackers were not from iraq but saudi arabia. the family of several 9/11 victims are suing the saudi government, arguing the government was linked to the attacks. asking the fbi to provide documents that could prove their case. jim kleinmer represents those families, joining us tonight. thank you. >> thank you for having me. >> tucker: this has confuse mead for years. i hope can you explain it as clearly as it can be explained. why would the u.s. government withhold documents that might plain saudi arabia's links to 9/11? >> yeah. the last administration, directors mueller, comey. obama fought against the families and maintained the coverup to cover up the fbi's own intelligence failures.

the fbi had identified the two hijackers in january of 2000 in the united states. was monday moring them and monitoring the saudi government officials helping them. fbi, intelligence community lost them. and 9/11 occurred. this was an enormous embarrassment to the intelligence community in the bureau and they tried to hide the truth from the families. moreover, president obama tried to stop the families from even being able to sue saudi arabia and show to the world how officials in the ministry of islamic affairs, and we've now itched 11 saudi government officials, identified them, provided the help al cade needed to mount the attacks. that was -- al qaeda attacks. that was done by the last president to try and get saudi

arabia not to oppose the iran nuclear deal. for 18 years, until this president, you have had presidents and fbi directors who stood with saudi arabia and the families have had to fight not only saudi arabia with its trillions of dollars and enormous power but our own fbi and the last president. finally we hope that horror is coming to an end and we hope we will be able to get all of the fbi documents that reveal the investigation. fbi agents on their own initiated to identify the saudi government officials who were the accomplices of 9/11. >> tucker: that's so infuriating i'm having trouble seeing straight. >> you and me both. >> tucker: yeah, taking what you just said. our government has no right to

lie to us and the families of those murdered on 9/11 to protect the saudi government. hard to imagine a more disgusting arrangement. jim, god's speed, all of russ rooting for you. to get those documents. >> thank you. >> tucker: i hope you tell us when you do. >> hopefully soon. >> tucker: amen. well, increasingly as you know if you've been paying attention the last response to any disagreement is silence the person who disagrees. five million members of the nra. democrats say you shouldn't be allowed to join the nra. all money managers might seem the same, but some give their clients cookie cutter portfolios. fisher investments tailors portfolios to your goals and needs. some only call when they have something to sell. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees

are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management.

>> tucker: last week san francisco's board of supervisors having solved every problem in the city voted to classify the national rifle association and all five million of its members as a domestic terror organization.

for now the plan is just to delegitimize supporters of the second amendment. plenty of people on the left don't want to stop there. no, not close. a new rasmussen poll, almost one-third of democrats say it should be illegal to belong to any gun rights organization. illegal. in other words, almost one-third of all democrats believe it should be a crime to openly support part of the u.s. constitution. huh. nowar is well versed in all matters second amendment related, a frequent guest on our show, happy to have you tonight. >> thanks for having me. >> tucker: 28% of democrats polled, i'm assuming this is a real poll, reputable pollster, it should be illegal to belong to an organization that advocates on behalf of a constitutional right. what do you make of that? >> i'm not surprised.

it's essentially what happens when you have a society that starts to champion the idea of emotion over intellect. we have essentially turned into a big group of mean girls. basically, i don't like what they do, like what they say, you can't join them and be a part of them. that's all emotion. the idea of communicating and engaging in intellectual conversation about a topic, we can't do that now. it's almost essentially a dumbfication of america. i feel i'm in a modern day version of mediocrity. >> tucker: there's a hysterical quality of a lot of conversations that aren't as you say conversations, they're more people emoting parent each other getting red in the face, a lot of heavy breathing but very few reasoned arguments taking place any more. i think you're right. what should the average gun owner or second amendment supporter think about this? should we be worried? >> do i think we should be worried. you have to ask yourself the

question, especially organization as being a terrorist organization. domestic terrorists, you don't agree with the but what is the end goal? talking about organization that has five million people who are american citizens. what are we going to, do round them up and throw them in prison, too? and the irony is, our founding fathers were considered terrorists by way of the british government because they wanted to come and confiscate our firearms and we said no. we're dealing with elements in our own country, saying we want to prevent you from owning firearms and we'll deem you a terrorist. so you have essentially proved, they have proved the point why the second amendment is as relevant today as it was in 1791 when it was ratified, no, you do want to eliminate the idea of bearing arms in this country and you'll go to whatever extreme possible to do it, even to deem you a terrorist. we all know what we do with

terrorists, it's not a good figh what is the end goal, that's the question we need to be asking. it is extremely dangerous. >> tucker: it is. and it does strike you, if you think about it, this same group of people is siding with criminals over the law-abiding, opened our borders to foreign nationals whose names we don't know, presiding over a country that's getting dirtier and more chaotic and dangerous. exactly the point all of this is happening, you're saying you don't have the right to defend yourself. that should make us nervous. >> makes me, look, i done a whole documentary series on san francisco, i could talk about it, i remember being here, i visibly remember being there. my conceal carry in texas doesn't transfer to california i was walking the street without the ability to protect myself. i didn't like it. it wasn't a very comfortable

situation. can i only imagine the people that have to live there day in and day out considering the crime that's going on now. yeah, it's a serious problem. >> tucker: yeah, i think the best response, the next time somebody demands that you give up your guns, okay, you first. [laughing] none of them will. >> even if they did give it up, i wouldn't give mine up. >> tucker: of course not. great to see you. >> thank you. >> tucker: the attorney general of california is trying to silence a pro-life activist for the crime of, it's the story, appearing on this program. after the break. in the human brain, billions of neurons play in harmony.

for people with parkinson's, some neurons change their tune, causing uncontrollable tremors. now, abbott technology can target those exact neurons. restoring control and harmony, once thought to belost forever. the most personal technology is technology with the power to change your life.

tak coalition of 48 states this week launched a major antitrust investigation of the monopoly google, about time. google has grown more powerful than many governments, maybe our own government, and bigger threat on freedom than we've probably faced in our lifetime. they control what websites appear on the search engine and videos people see on "you tube." that's bad as is. even worse when google has a close relationship with the dictatorship of fascist china. in 2017, google opened an artificial intelligence lab in china that will power up chinese military and make them better at oppressing their own citizens. 48 states launched investigation of google, possible antitrust violations. interesting to note one of the only holdouts was the far left california attorney general javier bacera, showing you how real his progressivism is.

chairman of the cea majority, he says it's time to break up goog. . you had a great piece on this and i want to read an opening line, put everything in i thought into context. you said in the second quarter of 2019, google, and i'm quoting, removed 500 million comments, more than 100,000 videos, and over 17,000 chance from "you tube." that gives you a sense of the scale of the censorship at this company that they engage in. >> it's pretty staggering, tucker, when you think about it too longle and the other tech companies decided they're the arbiters of free speech, they decide if there's free flow of information. you have had dr. epstein on but the manipulation of information flow leads to manipulating elections as well. the other thing i wrote about, tucker, is that you see the silicon valley companies roll out social credit scores like

communist china is doing. i remind people, the tech companies and corporations are rolling out these credit scores because they're deciding what is right and wrong, creating their own moral code, then they roll out the credit scores to manipulate behavior to achieve the desired lineup with the world view, with their system. i forgot when we had the conversation, decided that our republic was going to be ruled by leftist organizations create agony constitution and new bill of rights. if we're not careful we are headed toward a tech oligarchy. >> tucker: that's exactly where we're going, at high speed. california is virtually there. what i'm spiced by, and you touched on this in your piece, how passive our political class has been in the face of this. the people we elect have in fact collaborated it seems with google. why? >> well, i'm i've starting them tech collaborators. you look at 2018, they spent $64

million lobbying in washington, d.c. alone. if you go back to 2005 they spent almost $600 million. i argue they're buying the silence of elected officials and buying the collaboration of organizations on both the right and the left, buying their silence, also buying their willingness to actually say good things about these tech companies. i think are making a total farce of freedom of speech, free flow of information. the rights that we're given in our constitution, endowed with and protected by the constitution. >> tucker: i we knew we had a problem, we had a senator from utah, chairman of the senate antitrust subcommittee, mike lee. if there was ever a trust, it's google. i said what are we doing about google. well nothing. because free market. that's when i thought, you know, this runs deep. >> it does run deep. it runs deep. if you look at google and facebook combined they own about

250 companies. i'll tell you, tucker, i hope they break up the monopolies, i hope the antitrust suits are successful. we have to redefine these companies. they're operating this nebulous 230 venture from the 1996 act. they need to be defined as publishers and telecommunication companies and we need to have a conversation and put into law protecting our rights as citizens, data sovereignty, our personal date a that's the point of government, government to protect the property of individual citizens including our data. >> tucker: if only our lawmakers cared about us it would be nice. thank you ned ryan, for your piece and for explaining it on the show, appreciate it. >> thanks, tucker, appreciate it. >> tucker: recently on the show we invited pro-life activist david galadan to talk about kamala harris once sent the cops to his house because he made undercover videos targeting her donor planned parenthood.

>> they got a highly political search warrant to conduct a political raid on my home to seize the undercover footage. it's law that you aren't supposed to seize unpublished materials of journalist. but that's what she did to cover up for planned parenthood and protect them from increased jut any about selling criminal partial birth abortion body parts. >> tucker: while harris' successor has no problem with google, he has the same problem that harris does with political dissent. he's against it and crush fit he can. not only is he pursuing criminal charges against galadan for the crime of journalism, but after he appeared on this show, they sought a gag order.

total fascist move. as if the first amendment doesn't exist. a judge deny it. but there's no limit to how ghoulish pro abortionists are. a nurse testified that a hospital in oak lawn, illinois run as special comfort room that it place is a borted infants in to die if they survive the abortion. the words hung in the air and left, no one is following up on it, unfortunately. so we thought we would. lila la rose is from "live action," joins us tonight. thank you. >> thank you. >> tucker: even as these, this segment has begun, within the last 3 or 4 minutes, josh hawley, senator from missouri and one of our favorites on this show, tweeted that he just received information from facebook, facebook is pledging to put some of your videos back online. what's your response to that?

>> so facebook used two abortion interests-to-two partisan abortion interests to punish by account and three million followers on facebook. they've been saying we're going to fix it, we're going to fix it for over a week. they're saying to it senator hawley and senator cruz and others, who sent a letter to mark zuckerberg saying why are you using abortion interests as your fact checkers of a pro-lifer. we'll believe when it we see it, as of about ten minutes ago the violation tags were still on our accounts punishing our pro-life accounts online. we'll believe when it we see it. >> tucker: the last time we had a pro-life guest on this show, the attorney general of california tried to force him not to talk any more. is this, is this a feature of modern american life, where if the tern general of a state doesn't like your opinions he can legally get to you stop talking? when did this happen?

>> yeah, it's preposterous, david galadan worked with live action for years before he and sandra merrick did their amazing investigation exposing the seg of baby body parts. this is california politics that's dirty. tech companies being protected by california cal and getting the protections, pro abortion. the attorney general becerra was campaigning with planned parenthood while he was supposedly prosecuting galadan and merrick for exposing planned parentho parenthood. the dirtiest you get in politics, fighting against investigative journalists, prosecuting them in court, protecting and getting money from the very corporation the abortion industry that they expose. the fact that becerra wants to do a gag order should not surprise us. he hates the fact that david is appearing on your program, getting the word out, people are

realizing this is the dirtiest it gets in politics. >> tucker: becerra is totally corrupt, he's welcome on this show. >> and kamala harris. >> tucker: yes, that is exactly right. >> she started this. >> tucker: she did. and has gotten almost no credit for it, unfortunately. very quickly, this story out of oak park illinois, a hospital had a room set aside for children to die in, beg ars belief. are you familiar with this? >> yes, it's heartbreaking. nurse jill stannic testified, explaining how she held babies that were aborted and born alive and left to die in a soiled utility room. this is the face of the abortion industry in america. the democrats are fighting against the born alive infant protection act at the federal level say being don't want to provide lifesaving care to babies that survive abortion attempts. you have abortion survivors testifying saying does my life matter f i survive an abortion

attempt should i become a victim of infanticide in the abortion facilities and hospitals. and the democrats are saying we don't care, you don't have the right to protection even if you survivor an abortion attempt. it is a chilling story and shows what happens when we allow the killing of a child. in the womb that leads to the killing of the child outside the womb. >> tucker: we'll look back on this moment in shame, i believe. by the way, thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: american colleges are tremendous at pushing a political agenda, they're still propaganda, they don't see too much else, calling the english language it self racist. details ahead.