but the good news we move back tomorrow 8:00 p.m. the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. corn pop? we are doing the show for you. sean hannity is next, live from new york city, and he takes it away. come 9:00. >> sean: keep reminding me all the taxes i pay. i love my accountant says once a year, whatever you do, sean, don't die in new york. i'm like, i will try. i promise, i will try. >> tucker: you want to be on the plane to florida. >> sean: 16% from another bite of the apple, tucker, a great show, thank you. welcome to "hannity," and we are tracking multiple big breaking news stories. coming up tonight, we will cover the ongoing, latest fake news saga at "the new york times", almost a daily occurrence. now, the paper's long-term credibility crisis has never been worse. president trump, by the way, also, in other news, is locked

and loaded. we have the latest about the hostility developing in the situation out of iran tonight. we start with another addition of jerry nadler clown show on capitol hill. again, in case you haven't heard, nadler's judiciary committee have started impeachment proceedings i guess against president trump, for what? high crime, misdemeanors, nobody knows, not even he knows. it is one big political stunt nothing short of a psychotic rage, a hatred that is never-ending. it's every second of every day. now, the simple truth is, there are no high crimes, there are no misdemeanors, no collusion, no conspiracy, no obstruction but jerry's psycho dog and pony show must go on. the judiciary chairman needs to appease the radical extreme base of this new democratic party. if that means destroying the careers of his colleagues every other house member in more

moderate districts and districts donald trump won, they could care less. it hurts the country but sadly he could carry the left. like speaker in name only, nancy pelosi, nadler is terrified of the squad. and all the other extreme socialists that are now stearing the ship of this new extreme radical democratic socialist party. and today, nadler, hauled former trump campaign manager corey lewandowski before the committee and corey lewandowski has testified before the house intelligence committee not once but twice. the senate intel committee for eight hours. and he was interviewed by special counsel mueller's witch hunt team for over 15 hours. so, jerry, what was the point of today's testimony? now, clearly today was not a fact-finding mission, it was a political grandstanding opportunity by a group of inapt, angry democrats. people that don't care about we, the people, you, the american people. they are not fighting for jobs, or a safer world, they are not fighting for more security in

this country. no, what they are fighting about the real issues facing america, donald trump -- impeaching him for no reason, take a look. >> at the house and obstruction of congress across every committee and virtually every investigation of the administration. >> we had mr. mueller here. had a long day of it. judging by all accounts, it did not go well. more obstruction by congress by this administration and you follow instructions and you are doing exactly what you thought they were doing. you are a little loyal soldier. >> the president is falsely accused of colluding with a foreign state to impact the election. jim comey, we deposed him at that very table, said after ten months of investigation, we didn't have a thing. >> bob mueller gets name special counsel, wastes $30 million in taxpayer money, 22 month investigation, sat at that table if you weeks ago and gave the same darn answer.

>> should be here to be telling the truth. the truth will set you free, and the american people. i yield back. >> the time of the gentleman is expired. of the witness may answer the question. >> i don't believe there was a question, congressman. >> yes, there was. >> sean: chairman of the clown show on capitol hill, if you're listening, i'm sure you will hear about it, you should know the democratic members on your committee, they pretty much looked as dumb and stupid as you do every day today. members of your committee, well, they were humiliated. they were embarrassed. corey lewandowski owned them. take a look. >> again, congresswoman, i recognize the privilege is not mine, but i've been asked by the white house, and i would be happy to answer your question or you can have a conversation by yourself but if you would like to ask me a question. >> the reason is -- >> don't ask me a question if you don't want me to answer. >> this is a house judiciary not a house party. >> are you the hit man, the bagman, the look out or all of the above?

>> i think i'm the good-looking man, actually. >> are you ashamed of the words you wrote down? >> president swalwell, i'm very happy of what i've written, but you can read it if you like. >> sean: nothing but a joke, the impeachment fantasy, yes to all the democrats on the committee, it is over, it's never going to happen, and what you are doing is you are showing the american people who you really are. the american people see this charade for what it is, but by all means, my advice, keep going. don't give up. keep giving this. all of your obsessive, compulsive rage, don't always give into the temptation. it is donald trump impeachment, 24/7, because i'm for sure the president's campaign, they will thank you after 2020's november election. joining us the very latest fox contributor sara carter, the ranking member of the intel committee, and that would be congressman devin nunes. you know, congressman, we have dealt with this.

if they didn't care about law and order. if they cared about obstruction. if they cared about russian interference. maybe they would have looked at the dirty dossier, if they cared about obstruction, they could have looked at the subpoenaed emails, the bleach bit. if they cared about spying, they could have looked at that, but nothing seems to impact them. why? >> what is really going on, sean, jerry nadler and many of the top democrats including ones on the committee, they are being challenged by the left. so, the squad is out fund-raising and recruiting candidates all over america that fit more of the socialist model. so that is what you are not seen. that is not what you are hearing. so they are caught in this fantasy land, where they don't know exactly what to do or they are impeaching but not really impeaching, and that got to do this to feed their base. i don't see how today was any better for them than the mueller report, when it came out, and

the mueller hearing. i don't see what they are getting from this, politically. >> sean: i don't know, but we've got a lot of steps now that are coming that i think we'll blow this all out into the water appeared sara, look, i guess everybody knows, there is nothing we have reported on the show that has been wrong. we were right about the dossier. we were right about the rigged investigation peered we were right about spying on the trump campaign pier we were right about comey, strzok, paige, mccabe, all of the others, and we are right about the counter intel investigation being president obama's. the question is, what everyone is asking me, we know you are right and see the evidence, if they are, it's overwhelming. when is something going to happen? do we know the answer to that yet? >> i don't think we know definitively the answer to that, because the doj -- remember, sean, they are being very tight-lipped about this. if this is an intense investigation, it's all encompassing. we have john durham -- and john durham is looking at every single aspect of the very

beginning from the origination of the fbi's probe into president trump and russia, which has now been debunked. horowitz is ready. his report is ready. it's being over viewed by the fact here is the information that has already been sent over to william barr, to the fisa, as well as the other documents, bruce ohr, everything congressman nunes had been requesting, may be declassified before the horowitz report comes out. that way, it limits the classification of the report for the public. this is very important. and one thing, i've spoken to a number of senators today, i've spoken to a number of people today. they've said let's take our time with this. let's see what develops, not rush. let's make sure this is done right so that the american people get the full truth. in the end, sean, this is going to be at the hands of attorney general william barr and john durham. they are in charge.

they are the ones that have oversight, and they are the only ones that can indict or move forward with any type of criminal prosecution, if any of these laws were violated, which we know they were. >> sean: and, devin nunes, you know this as well as anybody. where do you see this now coming or going? and we keep hearing that the fisa report by the inspector general will be devastating. i would assume that he concludes that all four fisa applications and warrants were obtained illegally. do you see any different conclusion than that? >> no, i don't, sean. where we are at right now are in evidence gathering. you look what came out with comey a few weeks ago. that was more evidence that we didn't have before. if you look at the horowitz report, i think what sara said is correct, the more that can be declassified, the better because we don't want to get the horowitz report out and i don't know how many pages it's going to be but i imagine it will be long.

we don't want to see it all blacked out. we want the american people to see everything. in order for that to happen, a lot of the documents that we have been requesting to be declassified have to be classified now. i would only add on with one final point on all of this, and that is that durham needs to gather all of the evidence and needs to make sure that whatever he takes, if he's actually going to do a prosecution of the dirty cops, he needs to have all the evidence. he needs to get it right. because we want to make sure that justice is definitely served in this case. >> sean: all right, congressman, thank you. sara, thank you. now we turn to breaking news in the middle east. president trump reportedly weighing retaliatory action against iran after a hostile regime carried out a devastating attack on some major oil facilities in saudi arabia. that is impacting the lifeblood of every economy around the world, and the free flow of oil

at market prices. yeah, that would impact many other country's economy. we would do okay. we are finally energy independent after 75 years, and the number one producer of energy in the world, but it is impacting the economies of people we do business with, it's impacting us. tonight, the secretary of state mike pompeo is traveling to saudi arabia, as these pensions in the middle east continue to rise. meanwhile, israel holds an incredibly important election. at the results, as we speak -- and my sources on the ground telling me it is too close to call. the prime minister, a churchillian figure in our time, bibi netanyahu, his political future will hang in the balance. it will not be good if he is no longer on the world stage. here with more is the author of "defending israel: the story of my relationship with my most challenging client," harvard law professor alan dershowitz baird fox and friends we can host pete hegseth come alive in israel, a little after 4:00 a.m. this morning.

pete, we will start with you there. i see some votes been counted, but i'm told the final outcome is in doubt by everybody. and, like in the last election in april, it was close at this hour, as well. >> yeah, eyes glued to the television in israel. too close to call, because all of the initial accounts are based on exit polling. the results will be certified today. one thing i will say, it is close at the top of the polls. bibi netanyahu has done better once the votes certified the media here, no friend of him but similar to president trump faces in the united states. the media here are very bibi netanyahu left-wing and so we've had to deal with the face of that as well as other charges but ultimately, the united states has had no better friend than bibi netanyahu. i've even seen campaign with bibi netanyahu throughout jerusalem, so that -- this election is about him. the security situation has been great under the last ten years for him. there is a lot of internal

politics going on, but as it pertains to the united states, if bibi netanyahu were not able to form a government -- that is what happens next. someone has to form a government, he might get that chance first. but again, this will unfold for weeks going forward. but if bibi netanyahu were not to be the prime minister, that would certainly change the landscape. >> sean: let me go to my friend, professor dershowitz, the prime minister saying we will work for a zionist government. we will block a coalition with terrorist-praising arabs. there are arabs in israel, there are citizens that vote. they tend not to vote likud or conservative, and for any left-wing government to be formed, they would need that coalition. i don't see that unfolding, either. i mean, we now have gridlock, if you will, in israel. at the end of the day, it will be hard for anybody to form a government. >> look, bibi netanyahu has been in magician in the past. he has turned to defeat into

victory. he may do that again. the first election is over. that was between netanyahu and gantz. now the second election begins, and the two major characters are president of israel and victor lieberman, who has 8 to 10 seats with his party. and he may be the kingmaker. and he is trying to forge a national unity government, in which both gantz and netanyahu alternate as prime minister, and you get a government with not 61 seats, but 70 or 80 seats. the problem is gantz has said he won't sit down with netanyahu because netanyahu is under investigation. so he is putting the interests of the fake criminal justice system -- because netanyahu didn't commit any crimes -- over the interest of the government. and i think would be far better if they were able to form a national unity government, if neither of the two -- >> sean: professor, last thing.

in his particular case, you know, it's not likely he would form what the arab coalition, either. >> no, he won't form with the arab coalition, either. i've known lieberman for years and i've known bibi since he was 22 years old. i know all the players and they are all zionist and they all love america. none would allow iran to develop nuclear weapons. this election is not about issues as it was a referendum on benjamin netanyahu, much like 2020 election will be a a referendum on donald trump. there are parallels to what's going on in his role in the united states. i try to draw the parallels my book "defending israel" because i know all the players and i personalize the issue that i'm waiting like everybody else to see whether benjamin netanyahu as you say, a churchillian figure, he will continue to be on the world stage appeared he's the only one who can call putin, china, india, and anybody else, i think, will change the nature of israel -- >> sean: i've got to go off,

professor. we are watching the results. thank you both. we will keep you posted as the results come in, and as warranted. and iran has details become available. first, brand-new details with the shameful conduct at "the new york times," the so-called paper of record. now, when the paper thought it would be a good idea to revive the unverified, uncorroborated sexual assault accusations against brett kavanaugh, two "times" reporters publishing a single source story from a third party claiming he witnessed kavanaugh committing sexual assault at yale. what was not reported by "the new york times" in that article, the alleged victim doesn't know a single thing about the alleged incident. and refused to be interviewed by the "times," wanting no part of the fake news trump rage. so why didn't the times initially report this incredibly important fact? according to the authors of the report, the editors are to blame. >> during the editing process, there was an oversight.

and this key detail about the fact that the woman herself had told friends she doesn't remember it, and she has not wanted to talk about it, got cut. i think actually what happened, the editors, being concerned about naming her, because the "times" have a tradition of not naming victims, and really have to deliberate whether to do that. in that sentence to have her name, it also had that she did not remember it. they took out the whole sentence and to remove her name to kind of protector and not just sending people to her door, we also took out the fact she didn't remember it. >> did you read it before it went to print? >> we thought we had, yeah. as soon as we realized this, we corrected it. >> sean: now, what we see here is not just bias by omission but effort wide company effort to smear justice kavanaugh after the rest of the media mob lied, smeared, slandered, and the

character assassination against the president and then of course anyone close to the president. don't hold your breath waiting for an apology or correction. it's never been more obvious "the new york times" is not a newspaper, it is a propaganda arm of the democratic socialist state party and literally fake lying news. all of those involved in the sleazy conduct, they are not journalist. journalism died in '07. we have been right for two and a half, three years, and they've been wrong. they are dishonest operatives working in an echo chamber known as the media mob, and i called them a mob for a reason. that is why these disgusting smears are repeated over and over again by nearly every other mainstream media outlets. look at news busters. they reported the news network and spent 30 minutes reporting promoting the times' vs reporting. i wonder if they spent 30 minutes correcting it. meanwhile, fake news cnn conspiracy television msdnc, they dedicated a whopping 233 minutes of coverage. will they spend 233 minutes of coverage now correcting the record and their mistake?

this has been the m.o. now for the last three years, lies, conspiracy theories, fake news a hoax, one outlet report said and everybody else repeats it as gospel. slander, libel, character association, this is what they do. this is who they are. and in the media mob's hysteria over a single-source, uncorroborated, third-party allegation of assault, with the no victim, the mob neglected to report an actual development. it does turn out it would be corroborating witness for christine blasey ford, the professor is not backing up her claims. why isn't that big news? despite the enormous pressure to do so. take a look. >> essentially, consistently last year in the reporting of this, that she doesn't recall the incident one way or another. she knew some of them, but kavanaugh's face did not ring a bell, and she thought the circumstances around the alleged incident, the fact that ford had

been at a certain country club that day, the fact it was a relatively small gathering, it didn't ring right with her, so she initiated a second conversation with the fbi, and reported all of this to them, along with the fact she felt pressured to change her story by friends of christine blasey ford and hers from high school. >> sean: is the president once said, truth is a force of nature. ben franklin once said, sting in any rebuke is the truth. despite all the bad reporting, lies, misinformation, propaganda, bias, they will not stop you, we the american people from getting to the truth. here, confident in. media reporter for "the hill," joe concha. joe, on the media side of this, they don't want the truth. this is now -- they've gotten away with three years of lying and letting it go, moving onto the next group of lies. so why would they change? >> yeah, i'm surprised after two and a half years of the mueller investigation and russia collusion and everything that

went into that reporting, which was just, when you look back at it, reckless speculation, using flimsy sources, one source, nefarious sources that were surprised but what we are seeing here from "the new york times." the question now, sean, why hasn't anyone of importance at "the new york times" made any verbal statements over one of the biggest editorial debacles this publication has seen, perhaps since the jayson blair fiasco? because the "times" always preaches about speaking truth to power, speaks about transparency from the leaders and the people of cover. they need to be transparent here in terms of how this story got to print in the first place, and right now, they are just trying to play a game of hiding and waiting for it to blow over, and that cannot -- >> sean: it's sort of like -- >> somebody has to come out and say what happened. >> sean: it is like cnn and humpty dumpty, you know the guy, the stenographer, if you will,

for jeff zucker. a guy says donald trump has killed a million more than hitler and stalin and mao. oh, i couldn't hear my feed. let me turn to judicial watch, tom fenton, you have now sued for documents of deleted emails of bruce or and nellie ohr, and what can you tell us about what you suspect is in there, tom fitton? >> nellie ohr writes a bruise or an email that we uncovered, saying i deleted. there were emails about russia, and we want to know what's going on there. was there an obstruction issue, related to the deletion of emails by nellie ohr, who of course worked for fusion gps? and hillary clinton, and essentially had a virtual desk at the justice department. given the fact that she was laundering and had her hands all over in their russia investigation come over at the justice department and the fbi. and we have this evidence in plain sight of someone deleting information related, potentially, to russia.

we are not seeing any indication anyone else is interested in this, so of course, we asked for the documents. per usual, we are getting the hand to the face from the deep state, so we have to sue again. it's frustrating that, we are the ones doing it, and b, we are fighting trump's own administration that has been misrun by certain officials over there, in terms of just being refusing to be transparent and protecting the agencies. >> sean: all right, thank you both. great work, as always, and when we come back, senator lindsey graham will weigh in on "the new york times," kavanaugh smear, and also the latest on when we might expect the general report on fisa abuse and the trump campaign. oh, this ad is gold. they just released a brutal ad about sleepy, creepy, crazy, uncle joe, 30330. i think you will like it. straight ahead. ♪ ♪[upbeat music]

♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller ♪i'm gonna follow the sun♪ ♪now i'm gonna tell my momma transitions™ light under control™ visit your vision source doctor to ask about transitions™ brand lenses light under control™

♪ >> this is hell. this is going to destroy the ability of good people to come forward because of this crap. to my republican colleagues, if you vote "no," you are legitimizing the most despicable thing i have seen in my time in politics. you want this seat? i hope you never get it. i hope you are on the supreme court. that is exactly where you should be. and i hope that the american people will see through this charade. >> sean: senator lindsey graham, south carolina, one of the most powerful moments of supreme court justice brett kavanaugh's confirmation hearings last year. well, the left is still not done

smearing justice kavanaugh. he joins us now, he is the senate judiciary chairman. listen, i've known you a long time. that was your finest moment, and you had a lot of good moments over your career. but you now see it doesn't stop. and even dick durbin said this idea of impeaching, what is your reaction to the "times"? it is no different than what happened that day when you spoke of. >> when you think you have hit bottom, it you really haven't when it comes to trump. it is not really news if "the new york times" did a sloppy job reporting about trump and kavanaugh because they are so biased, but what is news to me is two united states senators running for president have called for kavanaugh's impeachment based on an article of "the new york times" that is bogus. and a member of the houses has introduced impeachment impeachment resolution of judge kavanaugh based on

and erroneous, scurrilous "new york times" story. so here is what i want you to know. any impeachment to "the new york times" story is dead on arrival in the senate. any impeachment of president trump based on the mueller report is dead on arrival in the united states senate. >> sean: well, let me ask you because this dovetails into their issues. journalism is dead. i expect this from "the new york times." they have no credibility. it's not even worth the paper it is printed on, at this point. and actually this news, they need donald trump more than he needs them which is interesting, but i get a little antsy waiting for the inspector general report, senator. i get a little antsy whether they will conclude what i know to be true. and that is, those four fisa application warrants were full of lies that they were warned about it. russian lies that hillary paid for, the bulk of information, a famous memo was put out, has your name on it. what i'm concerned about, i wan, those warrants were illegally obtained.

do you think i'm likely to hear that? >> you know, i really don't know. horowitz did a good job to the clinton e-mail investigation, but he is not a prosecutor. he doesn't have the ability to subpoena and interview witnesses outside of the doj or the fbi. but here is what i do believe. i do believe the warrant process was abused. and not only do i hope he will tell us that it was off of the rails, i hope the fisa court will take the report seriously. i'm looking for the fisa court to clean this mess up. if the court doesn't take corrective action, why should we trust the court in the future? i'm looking for durham to hold these people accountable if they did, in fact, take the law into their own hands. i'm not looking to prosecute someone because i don't like them. i want to make sure this never happens again. >> sean: let me use your lawyers brain here. if you are warned ahead of time that the dossier is -- hillary, she paid for it and

the guy that authored it hates trump and you are also warned it's not verified not once but probably at least four -- and i have a source telling me five or six times they were warned, that is premeditated. then, if you didn't take the time to verify, so now we know it's unverifiable. the fbi, when they got around to verifying it after the warrants were already issued, they determined it was not the truth. none of this was true. that means a premeditated fraud on a court, for the purpose of spying on an individual and denying the individual rights, carter page, but then it is an open door to all things trump campaign. transition and presidency. now, you are the lawyer. does what i just described sounds like crimes to you? >> well, it sounds horrible. if we legitimize this, god help us all. if we legitimize the fact, the department of justice. >> sean: that's not the question. i'm not trying to be a pain in the neck, but if i commit and go

before a court and i lie and i was told ahead of time, what you are telling the court is a lie. is that a crime? >> yes, that is a crime to get false information to the court. but i'm not a prosecutor, horowitz is not a prosecutor, but we will leave that up to durham. here is what i want you to know. every american should be concerned about the fact that the department of justice and the fbi knew the source of the document had a bias, and they did nothing to ensure the document was reliable, if not reliable to this day. and if the court does not clear this up and take corrective action, then why do you expect people in the future to be deterred? if somebody doesn't go to jail and if the court doesn't hold those who lied to the court accountable, then we will have missed a great opportunity to restore the rule of law. >> sean: i will tell you, i take it a step further, we might as well shred the constitution. because that means -- >> that will be a a bad day for america to let this go unaddressed. >> sean: last legal question.

if you're sifting my emails, and i decide to delete half of them, and then i bring in computer experts to tell me how to clean my hard drive, wipe it, bleach it out, and then i have an aide of mine bust up my phones, my blackberries, and remove the sim cards, would you think i'm committing obstruction of justice of the committee and their investigation? and number two, would i not be charged in that case? because i think i would, but i'm not a lawyer. >> the first thing if you are at home, don't try this because it will not work out for you. the bottom line, if there is no consequences to taking a hammer to a device being asked by congress and bleaching out information congress wants, then what is the down side of lying to congress and obstructing justice when it comes to congress? this is a big deal. i have a lot of faith in durham,

horowitz, and i have a lot of faith in me. >> sean: you guys work fast. i work 16-17 hours a day. i'm like, where is the stupid report by this time? i'm getting a little impatient here. >> i'm not worried when it comes out, but i'm worried what is in it when it comes out. >> sean: i know you will do the right thing, senator. thank you. when we come back, a blistering campaign ad. sleepy, creepy, crazy, uncle joe, 30330. charlie hurt, and much more breaking news tonight. ♪ ♪[upbeat music]

♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller ♪i'm gonna follow the sun transitions™ light under control™ new transitions™ gen 8™ lenses are now faster than ever. and learn more at transitions.com

billions of problems. sore gums? bleeding gums? painful flossing? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath healthy gums oral rinse fights gingivitis and plaque and prevents gum disease for 24 hours. so you can... breathe easy, there's therabreath at walmart.

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free. ♪ >> sean: the trump campaign has put out a brand-new campaign ad, addressing the ongoing speculation that sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle joe, 30330, is not up for the job as president.

well, let your own eyes tell you what the truth of that question is question is. >> i think biden looked unsteady at many points. >> play the radio, make sure the television -- excuse me, make sure you have the record player on at night. >> he's not the most polished speaker anymore. >> the president, my friend thinks -- >> watch his long, winding answers that don't make sense in recent debates. the question is whether it's gotten worse and with rates up for this. >> the fact of is, the future president can -- excuse me. >> a lot of people are concerned about joe biden's ability to carry the ball all across the in end line without fumbling. >> sean: with reaction the author of the book "still winning" the best seller, charlie hurt. michael best, former white house chief of staff and former rnc chairman.

we all like sean spicer. do you like sean? a great sense of humor, self deprecating. sean was on "dancing with the stars," not a great dancer. he didn't score very well. here is the thing -- you were there, and you let him wear th that. i blame you as much as him. why did you not rip that off him and take it away from him? what the hell was that? >> i don't think -- i went downstairs to my daughter's play room to try to find a lime green or pink boa i could wear tonight for you. but i couldn't find it. >> sean: if you were a real friend, you would have ripped that off of him. you are not a real friend! no friend would let a friend to do that. >> i would keep all the clothes i could on sean, for sure. [laughter] >> it was a fun night, sean. i thought spicer did a good job, given the fact he's pretty stiff.

and so, the fact that he was out there, having a good time on the show, he's a fun guy. >> sean: all right, let's go on to the ad. i think it makes a very solid point. i, honestly, at this point, i think elizabeth warren is right there with him, and seems to be the one emerging, you know, if the establishment does not get enough votes for joe 30330. >> first of all, i think it's important to note, if you are on the campaign team, we were the main debate coaches for president trump, and if we asked the president we need to nail these two or three things tonight. we need to remember this text message number. we need you to remember the cost of your own health care plan. president trump would have nailed it. so, it's not even so much the gases. it's good to be running joke,

and the dems will bring out the brass knuckles starting november. but if you are on the biden campaign, it is the inability of joe biden that he has in explaining and defending his own plans and his own record, as a senator and a vice president. that's the biggest problem. and guess what? joe biden isn't getting better with age. he's not going to become less gas-prone as we move forward. he is incapable of delivering and defending his own message, and that is the problem the campaign has. if i said to president trump, i need you to remember this five digit text number at this debate, no question, he would do it. if that's the problem that joe biden has. >> sean: all right, charlie, i'm looking at it, and i don't know what to think at this particular point. i would just say biden has eight shots, but he is the establishment guy. but even he has run to the hard left, supporting the new green deal, everything in between.

i have no idea, i don't even want to see his health records. i can look at the guy, that he has aged 20 years since he left office. he doesn't look good to me. >> i don't know what his team is thinking about having him reach far to the left for some of these things, when the winning lane for the democrat would be that sort of "moderate lane" which i don't think applies to joe biden. but the truth of the matter is, the guy has been around this place for five decades. he's been running for president for at least over the past three decades. and he is really bad at it. and he's not very good at defending what his message is and what his political view of the world is. he can't explain any of that stuff. the other thing worth pointing out, even though he is propped up as this great, experienced, old hand in washington, you know, what was barack obama doing, putting this guy as his replacement? if something bad happen to president obama?

and i think that calls into question his judgment. >> sean: all right, guys good to see you. charlie agrees with me but a quick recap. friends don't let friends wear -- and we will put it back up on the screen. because charlie, you agree with me. you would never allow a friend to wear what sean spicer was wearing on "dancing with the stars" last night, right? charlie? hello? i think i lost him. thank you both. liberal lunacy striking again in new york city. you are not going to believe, you will not believe what they want to ban from school lunches. geraldo, dan bongino, straight-ahead. ♪ want to ban ♪[upbeat music] ♪now i'm gonna tell my momma♪ ♪that i'm a traveller ♪i'm gonna follow the sun♪

♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller transitions™ light under control™

>> sean: once again,

new york city succumbing to liberal lunacy among soaring homelessness rates and each and every month, widespread mistreatment of the police, yes, the city of new york are prioritizing and holding on the big issue facing the city: a ban of chocolate milk in new york city schools. part of the department of education is now allowing over 1 million students to be away from school to participate also in a climate protest on friday. fox news correspondent geraldo rivera. former secret service agent and fox contributor dan bongino. we had comrade de blasio on the show. and he once tweeted out, meatless mondays, public schools. and i'm like, no kid wants meatless mondays. he said, i know it is a hit because the kids love it and sean hannity hates it. then i said, well, i will put my menu, monday mcdonald's, taco tuesday, wendy's wednesdays. thirsty fridays, margarito's.

no kid wants his menu, no normal kid wants his menu. now, they can offer it, but let kids decide, no? >> well, i love chocolate milk and you talk about it right now, but the serious aspect of my childhood obesity is a real problem and it is an epidemic. and the school lunches -- >> sean: hold on, your mike is giving us a heart. dan bongino. >> listen, i don't know where geraldo was going to go with that, and whether chocolate milk is good or bad, chocolate milk is not that bad for me. i'm not a nutritionist scientist but all of the problems in the country, the opioid crisis, street chaos and some of the inner cities, some family struggling through the manufacturing being hollowed out, i'm pretty sure that chocolate milk crisis is like 1,000th on a list of 1,000 problems. this is the greatest irony

on liberalism. not only is it a forest fire and a plague on the country that is single-handedly destroying the inner city, sean, it is wholly unbelievably, unself-aware of its own destructive capacity. it doesn't even -- the liberals don't deceive at destroying the place, so what did they do? they start focusing on chocolate milk of all things, ridiculous. >> sean: do we really need the government telling us, nanny-state bloomberg that we can't can't buy -- a big gulp? i actually stay in shape. but when i want a piece of pizza, and i want mcdonald's or wendy's, i love it. i'm not going to say i like it, i love mcdonald's quarter pounder with cheese. i love wendy's quarter pounder with cheese. i love their french fries. i love it all. >> i may five guys guy, personally. this is not a joke. i'm not making this up. i remember reading, five or six

years ago, one of the studies that showed the best thing you can do after a workout is drink chocolate milk. so the bottom line, you are right. the big boy rules. government, just leave us alone. ronald reagan, i'm the government and here to help the worse words you could hear. just get out of our lives. you don't know what thing about us. let us drink our chocolate milk. >> sean: i mean, for example, this is a jewel advertising on the radio show. i like jewel. but some people putting cannabis oils doesn't mean the rest of us should not have it. the vast majority of cases. and geraldo's bad mic, so please be patient with us. geraldo, what did you do to the equipment? you didn't want dan to beat you up on this? what is going on? do we not have her although? >> hello? hello? >> sean: talk to us, geraldo. talk! >> i think the demonstration that they are allowing these kids, if you can hear me, the public school system where i

williamsburg, brooklyn, brooklyn. they are allowing all these children to protest climate change. they are giving them a free pass a day off from school. i love student activism. i think it's a great idea. the problem is you are promoting one particular point of view, which happens to be the point of the view of the mayor, de blasio, that climate change, you know -- >> sean: that is why all of these democrats are out of their mind. geraldo, we will get you a new mic. dan, thank you. when we come back, caught on tape, we have that next. ♪ we come back, caught on we come back, caught on when we started our business

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. . .n

>> sean: very disturbing news out of minneapolis. a string of senseless beatings robberies all caught on tape. trace gallagher is live tonightg

with the latest on this. this is brutal. >> these mob style robberies are gruesome. they show large groups of what appear to be black males and surrounding white males and beating them unconscious. police say the mobs are specifically targeting vulnerable victims for things like cell phones. one victim said he thought they would only punch him a few times, until they knock him out. as he watched this video obtained by fox news correspondent matt finn, keep in mind these don't qualify as hate crimes because instead of targeting people for race or class, there targeting the physically impaired or compromised. minneapolis is in the midst of a crippling shortage of police officers. the police chief wants to add 400 officers but to some city council members don't want to add d any. and, consider this, over the past year, the police department was unable to respond to nearly 7,000 priority one calls. things like stabbings, shots fired, sexual assault, and they also couldn't respond to seven priority zero calls. the highest level, like a baby not breathing or a police officer down. so far, 20 young people have

been arrested in these mob-style beatings.sean. >> sean: it's soulless, what you see on that tape. it's like something very wrong. we better arrest every one of them. hold them accountable. thanks, trace. that is all the time we have. let not your heart be troubled because laura ingraham is standing by. >> laura: hannity, fantastic show. >> sean: am i allowed to lodge a complaint?i' >> laura: sure. >> sean: okay. i'm watching the rest of the president speech in new mexico tost night and i wanted to see the ending. you cut to the debate early, and it was just at the end. sorry.nd i loved watching your show, too, >> laura: is that the white house speaking or is that you? >> sean: that was hannity. >> laura: i couldn't tell. i'm just teasing you. >> sean: the point is, we were right at the crescendo! a great work of mozart and then you are about to crescendo. >> laura: got it.

you know what we used to