job they're doing. tuning every night-night at 8:00 p.m. to the show that is the sworn enemy of lying pomposity smugness and groupthink. we have great news for you tonight. live from new york city the one and only sean hannity ready to go. >> sean: great show as always. welcome to "hannity." we have so much information it will take the full hour that we will give you tonight but i promise you the media moths, the single most repugnant corrupt wine group of people in this country with a political agenda for one party, we are going to lay out the truth each and every detail with the president did absolutely nothing wrong. nothing. the democrats, the media, they are just outright lying to you again. three years of lies, coverups, conspiracy theories, and a hoax, they are doing it all over again. and this is from the country, i will tell you this, if you love our country, and i know you do, this is an all hands on deck moment.

this is about our way of life. this is about our system of governance that has been the single greatest system ever created by mankind that has a range of the standard of living in the entire world. life, liberty, the suitor for happiness. you believe in that, freedom, our rights, you really need to engage now like you never have been because the day on the other side along with their cohorts are unholy alliance, the media mild, the democratic party, one in the same, because what they are doing is so dangerous, wanting to undo an election at any circumstances, that if they succeed, if we inherit it as americans will be unrecognizable. as we speak, what is happening, they are attempting to remove a duly elected president from office based on nothing but a manufactured crisis. now a second witch hunt, after three years of the first

witch hunt, no collusion, well, they now started another one but this when they are not going to make this a mistake which is we are not going to wait three years and then get disappointed in the end. this is devoid of actual crimes, misdemeanors, even minor impropriety doesn't exist here and the great irony is that once again, it is the democrats that are guilty of nearly every single accusation they are throwing on the president you elected that they want to remove from office. running theme on the left and the media, the everything they choose the president of they themselves are guilty of doing. you want clear evidence of a quid pro quo? look no further than sleepy creepy crazy uncle joe. he is bragging about it. now what about russia collusion? okay. we have hillary clinton, yet, the dirty russian dossier with funneled money hiring and offer

a research group and an am i six christopher steele there. as "the new york times" called it, rusted dish information from the get-go. and then it was used of course to spy on the trump campaign transition and even the president of the united states, one of numerous ways, this president has deal with things that no other president has deal with before. now with the ukrainian collusion. in 2016, the dnc contractor was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars. why? to pressure ukraine and ukrainian officials to dig up dirt on donald trump and trash's campaign and as an added bonus, we do have four u.s. senators, lessee, mendez, murphy, lady, oh, dick durbin. they are all on records running the government of ukraine with untold consequences that if they don't comply with their anti-trump demands and their

investigation witch hunt from the russia issue. it wears all the hysteria over that those particles close? for example, hillary paid for russian lies and influence the campaign. nobody said a thing after she stole a primary, read it, after she had rigged investigation that she kept her in the race and then she gets the insurance policy. what about the hysteria over all of those examples of collusion? only if it's trump. where are the eye believers surrounding a democratic lieutenant governor in virginia? you know what, we're we are watching here is a pattern of holding and it's sort of quickening now and that is they are not going to wait three years. we will just impeach him. let's pick it out of a hat and the mob of course supports it with nose logic, no facts, no reason. you have to suspend every bit of god-given intelligence and common sense you have to believe there is to this and we will have all the details about the

hypocrisy coming up tonight. now, we do have joe biden's campaign. they want to actually stop at rudy giuliani from talking. they demanding tv executives block him from appearing on shows like ours. by the way, they don't want him exposing the truth about what joe did with the prosecutor appeared why would a vice president of the united states of america want a ukrainian prosecutor fired or he's going to withhold $6 billion and by the way you only have six hours to do it? there would be a shakedown by biden with the reason of that's right. he wants to protect his son who had no experience in ukraine, oil, gas, or energy and was getting paid a fortune. millions of dollars. and rudy giuliani about it was just subpoenaed by house democrats. this is going to be one of the greatest shows on earth. can't wait to see that. rudy giuliani will join us in a moment and his body would like to defend his actions as vice president, we have invited him on the show appeared i'll gs

worth of shows. high showing cable. you can join us right here five nights in a row. we will even give him three hours of my radio show. we are more on that. the first, we do have major breaking news that is devastating to our national security. once again, the contents of yet another private phone call between our president and a world leader was leaked this time to "the new york times." this is now the fourth time, the fourth example, leaking the president's confidential communications with world leaders. let's see, australia and then mexico come ukraine, and australia again. geraldo put it well. this president is being forced to deal with snitches and rats and back stabbers for three years. people within our government trying to establish as an undermine and undo an election. what other president has ever had to deal with this?

think about it. each day president trump now has to work against powerful unelected deep state bureaucrats that hate him. how does he get to do his job? at what point does this become dangerous? for the entire world if he can't negotiate in good faith with world leaders? what world leader will ever talk to the president and confidence on a phone call? and some of these bad actors now spy on the president's communications and link them to the media. it is a massive national security crisis. who is spying and leaking this information? calls between world leaders must be some of the regarded conversations in the white house. world leaders must be able to communicate freely and clearly with our president. that would be good for world peace, negotiation, our economy, but that's never going to happen again. if the trust is now forever been broken. the world is less safe because of what these people are doing. abusing the powerful tools of intelligence that we entrust to them keep us safe, not to use as

political weaponry against american citizens or an american president. so far, we have seen links, as i said, next to australia and ukraine and now we have another leak with the use australian prime minister. if this is how business is going to be conducted, it's probably time we get the contents of some other people's calls, other presidents, for example. how about obama's conversation conversation -- i will have more flexibility after the election? i'd love to hear the after the election calls and the promise he made to vladimir putin or how about the full transcript of obama's calls with the people in iran? that led up to this horrible nuclear deal and him getting $1e number one state sponsor of terror that want to wipe israel and the u.s. off the map? while you're at it, why don't we get might biden's communications and phone calls and transcription of the leaders that he talked to with ukraine? that's when his son got that

lucrative deal. is that what they want? by the way, what was the big so-called bombshell development from the most recently -- go look at "the new york times." president trump requested the australian government that they cooperate with the attorney general's investigation into what is the origin of the russia probe. in other words, the doj official is now telling fox news the attorney general did as the president to make standard introductions to officials in multiple countries who may have pertinent information in the ongoing probe. now according to the department of justice, these requests are not out of the ordinary at all and so far the countries have been very helpful without any need for pressure from the white house and you won't likely hear this from the media mauled, you see, this is the part of the story and the russia witch hunt that they didn't want to pay attention to. yes, we are going to get the story on fisa abuse and the inspector general's report. we will also get those barr

durum report also and the investigations into this russia witch hunt. the incredibly important nonpartisan investigation. a big piece of the probe surrounds whether or not obama administration and tell people at the highest levels, whether they tried to circumvent united states law and spy on american citizens by simply circumventing the law and outsourcing and subcontracting the illegal surveillance to intel agencies in foreign countries like great britain, can you do me a favor? i need information on president trump. italy, do you mind spying on our president? australia. yeah. all of those countries are being looked into as having done that for, yes, our own intelligence people because legally they can't so they thought they were being cute trying to get around that law. so it's pretty clear why the department of justice needs to be working with australia and italy and authorities in great britain to probe into the

origins of a russia witch hunt has a very real investigation into real serious government abuse of power and corruption. democrats, the media, they have never told you that story. they don't care about actual crimes. if the day, they would've clearly seen what we did a slam-dunk case when hillary clinton committed multiple crimes in the espionage act. they would've seen that when it says that the top of the phis application verified and you don't verify it and you use russian lies just by on a campaign and then a transition team and then a presidency and then deny another american their constitutional rights, yet, they would've told you that story too but they conveniently left it out. instead, the left is totally consumed with hatred for all things donald trump. in fact, they have spent only the last three years trying to find some way, anyway, to impeach him.

he was buster. the mob began fault calling for impeachment only two days after he got elected. the next 35 consecutive months, guess what, more and more calls for impeachment. impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, what is just of the country, they don't care. they care about peace and protecting our country. i don't care about that either. they care about economic opportunities and jobs and the economy. they don't seem to. take a look. >> i will fight every day until he is impeached. impeach 45. impeach 45. >> donald trump now sits at the threshold of impeachment. >> given the events of today, look the likelihood of impeachment, i'm not saying necessarily but it certainly wet out. speak of the constitution cannot be any clearer. impeachment is the appropriate remedy. >> we are going to go in there

and we are going to kick some -- i am told by the house to initiate impeachment proceedings. >> they told us enough to interpret what he said as a referral for impeachment proceedings. >> it's time for us to impeach this president. >> they are considering what to do about it including possible voting on articles of impeachment. >> there should be an impeachment inquiry opened. >> they were going to get elections from her. you see anything missing from all this hysteria? no crimes, no misdemeanors, no conspiracy, note construction. flanders, smearing, submerging, that's what you get from your democratic socialist party and god forbid they ever give you your green your dear and medicare for all their that's what they wanted since 2016. now democrats and the mob, they value vengeance above all else. they are so disappointed that there lies didn't become their

reality and their current impeachment hysteria surrounds nothing then what has become a nonstory about what has become a perfectly normal telephone call between the president and his ukrainian counterpart. we now have the transcript. there was no quid pro quo. it was no collusion. no misconduct. the united states and crane even have a treaty that allows the two countries mandate that we m. the president was saying we have all this trouble with our election and you guys are the president problem. the president by the way has this to say with a hysteria. take a look. >> this whole thing is a disgrace. there's been tremendous corruption and there's been corruption on the other side. it is been corruption like you've never seen. slough the new president of ukraine ran on the basis of no corruption. that is how he got elected and i believe he really means it but there was a lot of corruption having to do with the 2016 election against us and we want to get to the bottom of it and it's very important that we dea

deal. >> you've got to read the transcripts. this was a perfectly normal legal phone call. so normal in fact that no leaguer or liar to the cowardly shift -- he had to make up his own fabricated version of the transcript and perform a dramatic reading meanwhile there are so many unanswered questions surrounding the whistle-blower that's not a whistle-blower and the report and all of this leaking and the dangers that it imposes to this country and our constitutional governance. why? so they can push this president out because as one congressman said back in may, we can't beat him. we probably can only get rid of him by impeaching him and that's all of these questions. jay sekulow's joins us and he is also the chief counsel of the american law of justice. i read the transcript and they are having a pleasant conversation. ukraine is at the heart of all of this. the president says we need you to get to the bottom of election

interference on the 2016 election. >> let me give you -- i think it's important for everyone to retain peerless remember how to starts. it's the day before president trump is sworn into office there is a change in intelligence information hearing. for eight years the obama administration was quite satisfied of with the going to free agencies. with about ten days left before the transition to a new president, they switched out and allowed to go to 18 agencies. james comey also has planted over at the white house and agent from the fbi duel signed going back and forth between the fbi and the white house. what was that person's job? then we have the leaks. first we will talk about these lakes for a moment. we have conversations starting in the early part of the administration that were leaked by intelligence officials. public conversation. public conversation, released to the public. that's called crime. then you have the president of

the united states on phone calls with other heads of states now has to understand that his phone calls are likely to be leaked to the press. why are they doing this? could it be they are doing this because there's an investigation of the investigators going on? by mr. drum, the u.s. attorney in connecticut? about the very reason? could it also be the reason -- what is the rule regulation statute that was violating the conversation at the president had with the president of ukraine? none. nothing. where was the collusion with russia to not exist? where was the obstruction? didn't happen. now it's ukraine. while that it was quid pro quo but then there was no quid pro quo. then it was a cover-up except the transcript had already been released. so you know this is? this is an attempt, a lame one, i have to say, from the

democratic party right now to placate their leading left-wing people that are actually running this party it appears. but you know who is suffering from this? the president's governing how he's doing his job, the american people. we do. the president would be putting a situation where he now has to worry about conversations he is having with world leaders being late to the press, that is not good for our constitutional republic. so what's at stake here is the very constitutional balance. so what is adam schiff do? he doesn't read the transcript. why didn't he read it? because there's nothing to it. there's no problem. what is he do instead? he comes up with a dramatic presentation, reenactment not based on the actual script. when he had the actual script, he called the -- what is this question mike this is a fraud being perpetrated on the american people and now we a pattern and a practice of intelligence officers, people

assigned to intelligence agencies, leaking conversations of the president of the united states with heads of states. that puts the entire constitutional framework at risk and shame on them for they are doing but here's what's gonna happen. we will find out exactly who's doing what, how it's being handled, did it start with that initial executive order by president obama at the end of his administration, what is happening now, we're going to get to the bottom of this. and sort of they try to do today? they try to subpoena a lawyer. rudy giuliani, the president's council, my colleague. nonsense. the information contained in the subpoena protected by attorney-client privilege. outrageous but they are trying to do anything it's also interesting that they did subpoena him to testify, they just want documents. they don't want him to testify because he has more information than they do and you don't put up a witness that has more information than you do so i think this is -- this entire matter as a put up on the people and i think that the american people i know are smarter than that and they know exactly what's going on here and

i will tell you this. i've dealt with this with the press all weekend. well how is the white house going to react? you know what? we went through a war with bob mueller and we won. this is a -- we don't need a war room here we need to respond as appropriate and we will end this will be handled. that's it. >> sean: jay sekulow, thank you for joining us. let me explain how if we go to the politico article, the problems with joe biden are serious here and especially -- look at politico 2017. i have the copyright here. if you look at it. i have it right here somewhere. it is january 11th and it is into 2017. let's go back and read from this particular article because this gets to the heart of everything the democrats are doing and what they have done wrong and what's going to continue. ukrainian government officials tried to help hillary clinton and undermine transit by publicly questioning his fitness

for office. they also disseminated documents, implicating a top trying to aid in corruption and suggested that they were investigating the matter only to back away after the election. they held the clinton's allies, research damaging information on trump and his advisors. well, it continues to mount for sleepy creepy crazy uncle joe. rudy giuliani is with us. former new york city mayor. i have is they would like to see you go and take up with congress because i believe jay sekulow, your partner, is correct. >> i don't have any experience in a courtroom. i get nervous public speaking and these people are of such intellectual heavyweights i don't know if i can handle it. >> sean: while he was still a president-elect. ukraine admitted they were doing election interference with this country. the president in this call asked them to help get to the bottom of what the media and democrats

said they wanted. they are not doing it. >> sean, you just laid out the reason why i was investigating and the reason why the president of the united states had obligations to ask the president of the ukraine to follow up on these allegations. there is substantial -- i don't want to exaggerate the pretty glazed to overwhelming evidence including the finding by ukrainian court that hillary clinton and the democrats cooperated with ukrainians with the order coming directly from the white house in january of 2017 to dig up dirt on her political opponent and they did. i bet politico regrets printing that actually because now they are doing everything they can to cover it out but in fact, they laid out the reasons why if i did it investigate it, i would be guilty of malpractice. they seem to forget that i am a

lawyer. if i were defending a terrorist, they would be going crazy that i was called before a senate committee. although civil liberties groups would say right to counsel beer and how can they intimidate a lawyer? it's fearless pursuit of trying to defy justice. i was not involved at any election as anything. this started two years before the election. it started and ended pretty much before the mueller probe was over. i was still gathering evidence to prove his innocence and all of a sudden i realize that there was a frame up, deliberate one, of the highest levels of our government and that a colossal pay for play schemes at the highest levels of the obama administration that was eerily similar to the clinton foundation completely corrupt behavior in which the clintons sold her office of secretary of state as for millions. is there anybody that believes

that ukraine or china were paying for hunter biden's expertise or do you have the common sense to realize they were buying the joe biden's office? that is very damaging to the united states. joe biden was sent to ukraine to impart deal with corruption and he helped to corrupt the ukraine. he is a laughingstock. we are to because we talk about corruption and this guy puts his incompetent son to work for the most crooked oligarch in russia. i mean, it is outrageous. the only really sad part of this is how much in the tank and how corrupt this media has become. they have corruption staring them in the face and they closed their eyes to it and then they make up charges against president trump that aren't

true. or they don't look at this whistle-blower. he is giving a hearsay evidence. the thing is filled with i don't know, i heard it, i overheard, there is not a single time he says i know. yesterday i produced a witness who is under oath. he is willing to give his name, he is willing to testify. maybe one of our republicans in the sentence could call him. he is the guy that biden fired. he is the guy that will testify under oath. he will face biden and say you corrupted my country. it you got me fired on false pretext and then you had the case against a corrupt company dismissed and i'm going to tell you one other thing, biden's corruption helped to cover up all of the allegations of

collusion because there was a company involved run by george soros who was involved in the investigation and that was closed on to cut off all of the proofs, the additional proof, of just how far the democrats went in the 2016 election and in corrupting the ukraine. >> sean: mr. mayor, the vice president was put in charge of ukraine. let's go to the timeline. 2014. it was only months afterward. we can find no experience in ukraine for his son, none. no experience in the energy sector, none. >> he had just been thrown out of the navy. he would pay him millions of dollars to go on a company that had to be reformed and the kid got thrown out of the navy after his father pulled strings to get him in? you got thrown out tragically i guess failing a drug test but china doesn't pay a guy who fails a drug test millions of

dollars, billions, in a private equity fund and sure as heck of a crooked oligarch doesn't guy who's drug challenge to be on his board. they bought joe biden's office. wake up democrats. you are covering up corruption and by the time and is over, you are going to be the party of corruption. >> sean: mr. mayor, the guys name is show open. he has signed an affidavit on threat of perjury. he already has. we know, he's talked to john solomon, he's talked to adc companies talk to "the washington post." here's what we do know. this is what we know. -- >> the man is afraid and if this guys cook it, he's not good at it. he has a little cottage, he doesn't have a big family like the phony prosecutor they put on yesterday. he has a little car and he scared out of his mind because these people there are dangerou

dangerous. >> sean: why would a vice president of the united states of america use that power, he literally is shaking down demanding in six hours the firing of a ukrainian prosecutor or he's going to withhold taxpayer dollars and using our money to shake this guy down in six hours. either fire him and it turns out this guy is a guy that's investigating the company that is paying his son who seemingly has no experience whatsoever, all of these billions of dollars and i guess the bigger question here is he got away with it. how does the media say that is not a pay for a place scheme? >> the moment you read "the new york times" article in 2015 and you saw that biden got away with having his son pulling down millions from the crookedest oligarch in russia, you knew this was going to happen. i prosecuted corruption.

democrats and republicans. i can smell this. obama let this happen. when that article appeared in the times, any honest president what has called the vice president in and say joe, what are you doing? i sent you there to straighten out corruption and you have your son who has no capabilities getting millions from a crook in the ukraine where they may have said because "the washington post" and all of the swamp the media allow us to commit crimes and go after the they are nonsense, we can get away with it. i believe that's true. these people are enablers. that's why yesterday they actually put out a document demanding that their coconspirators, the press, silence me. why do you think they are silencing me? because i'm not making any points? they are silencing me because i showed up with an affidavit

yesterday and an accuser who is willing to stand up and point the finger at joe biden and say you are a crook. i have the proof and i have the documents and i've got -- the witness will say the cooperation because there are more witnesses where he came from and they are not going to escape this sean. the american people are fair people and they don't like what they see which is a family, the biden family, that has been using as an asset for themselves, this public office, going back to his brother who was selling his son in office when he was a lobbyist in health care. it's scandal after scandal covered up by a compliant crooked press. >> sean: we will get into that issue with the health care and we will also get into the billion china deal. what you testified -- because i think jay sekulow is absolutely right. you don't have to do anything.

>> i don't know appeared i'm weighing the alternatives. all go through it. i'll get my evidence in my chart. i don't know if they would let me use video tapes and tape recordings that i have. if they will let me get some of the evidence that i gathered and i have to tell you, all of this nonsense about i've interfered with the election, i gathered all this evidence before the molar probe ended so it was clearly under my responsibility as the lawyer for the president of the united states. the final meeting that the ukrainians had i did in the investigation was over. >> sean: are bringing up one more time. politico. january 11th 2017. ukrainian efforts to sabotage prompt backfired. key officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect. politico. they are not concerned.

they try to help hillary and undermined chomped to publicly question his fitness for office. they suggested they were investigating the matter. a ukrainian american operative was consulting for the dnc. he met with these officials in the ukrainian embassy in d.c. and an effort to expose ties and et cetera to the trump campaign, paul manafort, russia, and in the end, the ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race helping to force manna for its rug is nation advancing the narrative cleared thank you for being with us mr. mayor. joining is now, senate judiciary chairman lindsey graham. good to see you. your reaction to all of this. >> i can imagine if my tempted

that he might be hearing all about it but the whistle-blower investigation has been sent to the intelligence committee. we will look at all things biden. i hope somebody outside of politics would do to the biden team what they did to trump. look at it really hard and see if a crime was committed. but here's what bothers me tonight. this "new york times" article about bar talking to australia is the beginning of an effort to shut down vars investigation to find out how this whole thing started and let me tell you why. i want to say on national television, barr should be talking to australia and italy and the u.k. to find out if there intelligence services opened up to counterintelligence investigation of trump campaign. if he's not doing that, he's not doing his job so i'm going to

write a letter to all three countries and asking them to cooperate with barr. this is a letter sent by my democratic colleagues in may of 2018 to the ukrainians are saying that if you don't cooperate with the mueller investigation, we are going to stop our aid. here's what i want american people to know. it's okay to cooperate with >> sean: on to get trumped but it's not okay to cooperate with barr to find out if trump was the victim of an out-of-control intelligence cooperation beard when i could have a country like that. >> sean: do you believe as i believe that the evidence will show what probably emerged to a durham or durham bar report that high ranking intelligence officials in part -- two issues here. do you believe that those three specific countries, australia, italy, great britain, that they were specifically outsourcing of

illegal spying. in other words, they subtract subcontracted spying that in order to circumvent american laws they said we'll use by honest person for me? do you believe that likely happened? >> i don't know but i know we are going to find out about that in two weeks and i think barr should be looking at that but i want to make this point really clear. "the new york times" article is an effort to stop the barr from looking at how this whole thing began in 2016 regarding the trump campaign. what are they afraid of? this really bothers me a lot that the left is going to try to say there's something wrong with barr talking to australia, italy, and the united kingdom. if you're worried about foreign people being involved in our election, you are to be worried about christopher steele being hired by the democratic party and here's my question. is this whistle-blower, whoever he or she may be, do they have any connection to the

intelligence community, the old intelligence community that was corrupt and failed? they are cia agents out there risking them lives but brandon and clapper, i am hoping and praying that somebody will look at the way the intelligence investigation began. it was it based on stuff coming from countries friendly to us? >> sean: when we were speaking with president zelensky which were never should be elites, or no foreign leader is going to want to talk on the phone again, and we need that to happen, when the president says i need a favor. we've had these election problems and you guys seem to be in the center of it all and we even have politico outlining here that they were admitting that they help hillary clinton and they were trying to make amends for the work that they did to sabotage our elections. i thought everybody in the media cared about that but it's only if it's donald trump. it doesn't matter if it's

hillary's dossier and it doesn't matter that it's ukraine telling us they did it. they influence our election. there were democratic operatives that went to them included with them for the purpose of getting damaging information. isn't that pretty clear and out politico article to you sir? >> it's very clear -- a couple things are clear. democrats wanted the ukraine to work with mueller and if they didn't they would cut off their aid. it's clear to me that liberals are starting an attack against barr to shut him down from going to italy, australia, and the u.k. to find out if there was something wrong regarding opening up the investigation into the trump campaign to begin with. if us on a double standard, i don't know what would be. such were attorney general barr, you are doing the country a great service by trying to find out what happened in 2016 regarding a counterintelligence investigation of the trump campaign. these countries should be cooperating with barr. there's nothing wrong with him looking into it. and as a matter of fact, there

would be something wrong if you didn't. so i'm going to right to these countries urging them to cooperate. >> sean: when are we going to get the final ig report on fisa abuse because honestly it's funny but it's not because we know that that was an unverifiable dossier and it's a dirty russian dossier. you know, you think about this. you think okay well they care about election interference. the politico, radio, they talk about what ukraine did to interfere in the 2016 election. they didn't care about russian interference with hillary's dirty dossiers for the democrats. they didn't care that she screwed bernie sanders out of the primary. they didn't care that they rigged an investigation poochie clearly obstructed justice. i think if i'd deleted subpoenaed emails i'd be in deep deep you know what so what about the double standard in all of this? >> what about whether or not the whistle-blower people are around

tied to the folks that opened up the investigation against trump to begin with? we will see. stu and senator, thank you for being with us. when we come back, how the inquiry is back firing on the democrats and what impact it will have on 2020 and by the way, new york city is going to find residents if they use the term illegal aliens. i do the show in new york city, at all. they may arrest me while i'm on the show saying illegal aliens. apparently it's illegal. straight ahead. ♪ when we started our business

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go.

our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/try and get 2 months free. >> sean: i'm joined by karl rove and john priebus. new yorkers can now say staggering fines up to $250,000

for saying illegal alien. if they sense any anger in the way you say it. trace gallagher, did i just risked getting fined $250,000 for saying illegal alien which happens to be the actual statutory language all around the country? >> you're exactly right. for context, we should note under u.s. code, illegal alien is the legal and appropriate term for those who are in the country illegally but now new york city's commission on human rights says if you use the term illegal alien to demean or harass a person you face a $250,000 fine. the very saying at 250,000 is in place if you call it emigrations with a discriminatory motive though the new policy doesn't explain how to make a nondiscriminatory call to ice. the human rights commission has also outlawed criticizing people for their proficiency in english. the deputy mayor of new york says this new legal enforcement

and guidance will help ensure that no new yorker is discriminated against based on their immigration status or national origin. this, by the way, is the same commission that banned employers and landlords from using gender pronouns other than those preferred by employees and tenants. by the way, if you use the wrong gender pronouns it's a $250,000 fine. >> sean: wow. we are losing the country be at all hands on deck as a set at the start of the hour. trace, thank you. on saturday, speaker of the house and name only nancy pelosi signaled her willingness to throw caution to the wind and consequences be and pursued the president's impeachment even if that means democrats lose the house in 2020. by the way, that is following the footsteps of the real leader, garcia cortez. and you know things are bad for democrats when bellmawr seems to be the only one making any sense when it comes to joe biden significant serious situation with his son hunter and the

millions of dollars that he got in ukraine from the guy that's looking into it was the guy ther tax money after he shook him down and then you have the whole china issue which should come down. >> why can't politicians tell their kids could get a job? get a job. i mean i mean this kid was paid $600,000 because his name is biy a gas company. the super -- it just looks bad. >> does sound like something john jr. would do end of don jr. did it, it would be all there were talking about. >> sean: here with reaction, former rnc chairman, ryan previous. for many jeopardy chief of staff to george bush, the brain himself, karl rove. fox news contributor and also former white house press secretary come now also fox news

contributor, sarah sanders. karl rove, let's get your take on this. it's like your white board take. i don't see this working out well especially with the liability of biden and i see another boomerang coming really quickly and i don't think the media is going to be able to spin out of the biden aspect of this and blame trump for what was an innocent phone call. >> look, democrats are edging for impeachment. they'll make several mistakes along the way. they aren't doing it formally so they are not granting as they have done and all previous impeachments against presidents and members of congress and judges, the right of the minority to undertake certain actions, subpoenas, witnesses, so forth. they're going to do it quickly. they left town for two weeks but they are bowing when they come back they will do it quickly and third, they are doing it without -- they are going to impeach without creating a bipartisan agreement that this is worthy of being taken to the united states senate so look. on the short run, they are going

to be on a sugar high and they will forget about themselves but i don't think it's an accident that of the 19 democrats who won seats in 2018, and districts that donald trump carried by four points are more than a ton of them have not yet even endorsed the inquiry. democrats have 19 of the seats that were won by trump that they flipped that were carried by four points or more. they have 31 seats that were carried by trump that they flipped in 2018. they have 43 seats that they carried that were previously occupied by a republican member of congress that they flipped in 2018. they lose 15 or 16 seats and they could lose control of the house by time of the 2020 election. >> sean: you look at your state of wisconsin and the good people of wisconsin. i don't see the democrats -- for that is done any thing besides try to impede any progress. they weren't working on any issues except lies in conspiracy

theories in russia or russia for nearly three years and now they come up with another witch hunt. how is that going to play in wisconsin? >> it's not and that's the perfect lead-in into what my chuckle points were going to be. number one, similarly to what carl said, the president has a huge simple advantage in this fight. the advantages that this is completely partisan. 90% of the democrats supported impeachment, the house members of jurisdiction are all partisan and the trump team needs to keep it that way because as all of these details are really important, your going through all of the details with you guys but someone also has to be talking about the big picture and in a state like wisconsin, most people out there, they aren't following all the details, and what is the big picture? the big picture is that the president can't be removed because there are going to be 20 senators agreeing to removal so much we have?

we have this huge waste of time and this huge waste of money. nothing's getting done for the american people and going into the election, that's going to be the message of president trump so as long as this is what it is, which is just a huge partisan exercise were nothing is actually going to happen, the american people are likely going to see it for what it's worth which is just a big partisan fight that's the disadvantage of the american people and someone, certainly part of this message in operation out of the white house and obviously the rnc is doing a great job, has to be on the simple big picture of what this is. >> sean: sarah, you dealt with the media that i don't know how you did that job. it's not when i can handle. i don't think i have the temperament for such a job here let's put it that way. but look at the medium knowledg knowledge. i mean it's just a conspiracy? let's see. he is on tape bragging about

demanding the firing as vice president of a prosecutor. six hours or you don't get the billion dollars. he's leveraging our tax dollars. his son, we know, didn't have any experience with ukraine or energy. he is making an awful lot of money. thinking a lot more in china too which is a separate issue that we covered. i'm thinking that how does the media just deny reality like this? >> it's because they don't like the president. it's real simple. it's sad because it's absurd but the real scandal here is all of the use of the biden's president's office that joe biden took part in helping in rich's family. that's the scandal. president trump shouldn't be getting impeached, you should be getting celebrated for actually draining the swamp and delivering on another one of his campaign promises. if he was a democrat, the liberal media would be absolutely cheering him on for going after corruption. they would be cheering him on and worshiping him the way that they did obama because they have a reason to celebrate as

president. he's actually getting something done. something obama didn't do. >> sean: one word answer. does this help or hurt the president in the end? >> i think neither. i think it a big -- i don't think it's an advantage or disadvantage. >> sean: it hurts the democrats. it hurt depends on how the president and his team reacts but it certainly hurts the democrats. >> i think it helps but hurts the country. it helps the president. >> sean: thank you both. thank you all. we will continue.

as a doctor, i agree with cdc guidance. i recommend topical pain relievers first... like salonpas patch large. it's powerful, fda-approved to relieve moderate pain, yet non-addictive and gentle on the body. salonpas. it's good medicine. hisamitsu.

the speech you are a villain of the day, the unhinged hollywood actor, kind of has been, robert de niro, i again went on a profy

rent this time against fox news and president trump during his appearance. jeff sacher's sonographer, ryan stelter, star that he is. take a look. >> this guy should not be president. period. >> when you say that folks on fox come after you. i member tony got up there and cursed. what you know, it's not in fdc violation but it is still a sunday warning. >> laura: he does have in his history of these violent remark. you may remember -- >> how do you use stated things he does. of course i want to punch him in the face. >> today the world is suffering from the world donald trump. come on. let's gulp it what are we talking about.

this idiot is the president. >> sean: deranged, let's see, hollywood elitists pampered hypocrite spoiled brat massive ego with no common sense intellectual honesty at all. we will never be the media mob or anybody in hollywood. let not your heart be troubled. it is laura, crazy times, laura. >> laura: i like him better in rainman. i thought he came across a lot much more relatedly. they all were like echo chamber. the jokes keep counting. speech and he is a grumpy old guy. he is pretty cranky. >> laura: yeah, dustin hoffman was rainman. >> sean: he is unhinged. >> laura: well, you had a great show. while times in washington but we really don't need the hollywood celebs lecturing us about the constitution thank you very much. bob, stick to what you are really good eye which is acting. great show hannity. than