this idiot is the president. >> sean: deranged, let's see, hollywood elitists pampered hypocrite spoiled brat massive ego with no common sense intellectual honesty at all. we will never be the media mob or anybody in hollywood. let not your heart be troubled. it is laura, crazy times, laura. >> laura: i like him better in rainman. i thought he came across a lot much more relatedly. they all were like echo chamber. the jokes keep counting. speech and he is a grumpy old guy. he is pretty cranky. >> laura: yeah, dustin hoffman was rainman. >> sean: he is unhinged. >> laura: well, you had a great show. while times in washington but we really don't need the hollywood celebs lecturing us about the constitution thank you very much.

bob, stick to what you are really good eye which is acting. great show hannity. thank you much but i'm laura ingraham. this is "the ingraham angle." so who is the whistle-blower and what could their identity reveal about the origins of this whole controversy? oh, boy. tonight i'm going to speak to a former cia analyst and whistle-blower himself who says that he has the answers. also tonight, congressman devin nunes just sent a letter to the intel community community inspector general about what he used to take off this whole ordeal and could the entire impeachment bush ruined the democrats in the eyes of the amn voters? corey lewandowski and davis hanson will tell us but first, democrats democracy problem. that's the focus of tonight's angle. it was nice to get out of washington last week. even if it was only for a few days in chicago. another city run by liberals. getting out of the new york

washington corridor it always reminds me of the fact that americans are generally a lot fairer and smarter and more practical minded than a lot of the bigwigs in politics and the media. especially in so-called flyover country. they have a pretty keen sense of what matters, where the solutions might be found, and what's not working. a lot of folks approached me -- no pies were thrown but they approach me with comments like these. laura, what's with all the craziness in washington? is this going to hurt the economy? why don't they just let the voters decide next november? this is absurd? obviously it's not a scientific survey and i'm not contending it is but these comments to get me thinking, and i've come to the sad conclusion that democrats are basically done with democracy at least when it delivers results they don't lik like. >> he knows he's an illegitimate president prayed he knows. he knows that there were a bunch

of different reasons why the election turned out the way it did. it was like applying for a job in getting 66 million letters of recommendation and losing to a corrupt human tornado. >> think about it. this is a woman whose state department office was a revolving door of foreign donors to the clinton foundation and by the way, whose campaign funded the phony russian dossier that led to the mueller investigation. and she is alleging an illegitimate outcome? is she kidding me? now she may not be commander in chief but i hereby double her celebrate in chief. >> this wasn't on the level. i don't know that we will ever know everything that happened but clearly we know a lot and are learning more every day and history will probably sort it all out. >> laura: last may, one politico historian alan lichtman who will buy the way it has

protect correctly predict of the last nine elections said something that has democrats seo have taken a hard a hard. >> child is it in 2020 and less what? >> unless the democrats grow a spine and do their constitutional duty and move into an impeachment inquiry and i think the evidence will show ultimately an impeachment. >> laura: in 2016, remember, nearly 63 million americans turned out for trump and he beat hillary by 74 electoral votes. the left cannot take that risk again. they are not so confident. even if they can't actually remove him from office with a senate conviction, they want an impeachment vote by years end to smear him. it may be that they think with some independent voters. >> if we don't do this quickly come the public is going to turn on us. they are not going to side with us if we did not side with

justice. >> laura: the key to understanding the current impeachment mania is anger. they are not just angry the democrats with tromp or policies. that many of them are angry with america. they don't care if impeachment is bad for the country, it is going to hurt the economy, or even if the president ability to conduct foreign policy. why don't their care? because they think we are basically a racist country that hasn't made amends. they think we are destroying the environment. they think our history is one long narrative of victimization. they think much of our patriotic traditions, the art, the music, the monuments, all symbols of oppression and ignorance. they think we are a nation founded by evil white men. they think that our electoral system, it even allowed trump to win and confirmed in their mind

minds -- >> let's abolish the electoral college. it needs to go. >> get rid of the electoral college. >> laura: again, for now, they may trust voters in places like new york and california but they don't trust them in places like south carolina or michigan. this is why they cannot lead trump's record on the economy or foreign policy stand on its own. not because they care. what a way it by the way about ukraine or because they think trump is conspiring with another country to raid the 2020 election. they don't think any of that. in fact, i would argue that impeachment is it sells a form of democrats election interference. and by the way, the democrats are fine with using impeachment by a political weapon. oh, boy, are they fine. because they see impeachment as a way to punish not only trump but us. after all, we elected him.

remember, they call this deplorables. we are clinging to our guns and our religion. and when obama said upon this your enemies, he was talking about you. cory booker last week use the word despicable to describe trump voters. the left now is so radical that they believe any election results is crooked if it doesn't advance what they consider to be legitimate social justice caucus. in other words, if you win and you are conservative, you haven't won, you've stolen the election always. stacy abrams played this game since she lost the ownership of georgia. >> it was not a free and fair election. >> can session needs to say something is right and true and proper. >> sometimes the law does not do what it showed. >> laura: by the way, she almost always says this and it's on challenge. abrams was too liberal for georgia. that's why she lost.

look, they know that at the end of the day, their policies of open borders and massive wealth compensation ending of fossil fuel industry altogether are deeply unpopular with the american people and they also know those policies will result in a lower standard of living for most americans. but they don't care. the fact that we are the most powerful and richest country in america isn't a badge of honor, it's a badge of shame. it's okay if it all comes down. in 2020, they must win by any means necessary. >> to defeat him at the polls would do history a disservice, would do our nation a disservice, he has caused fraught to the society appeared we need to do something better. they wanted their choice to weaponize impeachment is all the proof you need of their aversion to democratic rule. it's the same on impulse by the way that drives them to want to see authority to the u.n.

the world trade organization. why they once favored the trans-pacific partnership. the prayers problem in accord. it's also why they will relied heavily on judges to regulate from the bench on everything from immigration to abortion. take the issues away from the american people. they can't trust the voters. de alexandria ocasio cortez democrats see the voters of speed bumps on the way to progressive promised land. the watch out kids, because these speed bumps have spikes. if your party stays on this antidemocratic road you won't just lose a tire coming or going to blow an that's the angle. in moments we will debate just how much the democrats are risking with this ridiculous impeachment push and how it's turning out a wide swath of american voters but for us, here to respond to the tactics, sol wisenberg.

saul, the democrats clearly believe they have the impeachable offense on the hands. you agree? >> no, i don't read this phone call alone even connect it with a timeline -- i think as you know i think the phone call was a mistake and the idea in and of itself being an impeachable offense is a joke. the one mistakes aren't high crimes and misdemeanors. if things can be interpreted especially by some people who don't like you politically, that is not what the threshold would be considered by our framers or throughout our democratic tradition. >> even if you consider it the trail of the public trust or in some sense corrupt, in and of itself, it is not enough in the framers would not have thought it to be enough to merit impeachment. >> someone put it this way the other day. as joe biden get immunity from scrutiny or investigation because he is running for president? by kurt this current

administration pressure mike c? because i would be a neat trick if you run for president but you can never be investigated. >> you know, they didn't have to do it that way. they could say what vice president biden's son did was profoundly troubling. was something that we should eradicate and we should look at this and let's look at president trump as well but they can even bring themselves to say that. i have to say they were cleared. well, cleared by who? what is he talking about? >> "the wall street journal" has a public piece about the clintons and ukraine but here's what the associated press reported today. democrats are driving the proceedings toward what some hope of the vote to impeach or indict trump by years end. tell us about that.

interesting choice words. >> the house can't do that. if you want to claim that to our viewers. >> only a federal prosecutor, only the department of justice, can bring an indictment where they have to bring it to a federal grand jury and they both have to agree on that so whoever wrote that needs basic training in physics. >> laura: here's some developments regarding the attorney general bill barr. headline from today's "washington post." attorney general bill barr personally asked foreign officials to aid inquiry into cia fbi activities in 2016. another one trump pressed australian leader to cross ukraine origins. this was from the australian investor. any problems there? >> not as far as ag barr is concerned. my understanding is that ag barr has appointed or delegated john

durham, widely respected u.s. attorney in connecticut, widely respected by both parties, to head the investigation of the intelligence operation against president trump in the election. it's totally appropriate for him to meet with foreign leaders, ag barr, and say this is my man john durham feared we would appreciate it if you would cooperate with him. he is running an investigation. >> they're bringing it up clearly to try to tar barr. >> i believe the central point of this whole exercise in addition to going after the president is to neutralize barr. because the ag has gone to great lengths to take a person who has an impeccable reputation so this is really from the beginning when it became clear that barr was competent and had integrity and wasn't protecting the president, it's been all about destroying barr.

>> laura: it doesn't surprise me at all that pompeo was on that call and was in the room and now they're saying well, he was supposed to be the adult in the room so now pompeo should be thrown over but to me it's one big smear machine trying to smear all of these people who frankly have all had impeccable records in public service. >> let's learn the facts. the democrats want to hold an impeachment hearing? was here the fact that i have an open mind. but she would happen on the call. probably if it's like a lot of the presidents discussions, pompeo may hit not have had any idea with the president was going to say. >> laura: i got to say, the bottom line is, there's a lot about joe biden and his involvement in ukraine is the journal writes tonight that we don't know and there is an aggressive lack of curiosity that developed that wasn't always there but developed among the american media which is staggering for people who were supposed to be interested in getting at the truth. >> i agree with you but that doesn't change the fact that the people disturbed by the phone

calls and say that this is money that's been very important money for an ally, money for defense that's been appropriated by the congress and approved and it shouldn't be made contingent upon something like the biden -- >> laura: your reading stuff that stop there. nancy pelosi did the same thing last night on "60 minutes." >> what i'm saying is that it's legitimate to look into that issue. the democrats want to look into it, let the chips fall where they may. if you want are you disturbed they are making up things and saying the president said help me out at the election? you never said that. pelosi is quoting things last night and she doesn't even get challenge. >> is completely false. he never said it all. they always overplayed their hand. there is no need to do that. >> are you worried about rudy giuliani? anything problematic there for him? >> i'm only worried about it -- i don't know what he said and what he didn't but i'm only

worried about it in the sense that as a private citizen in his ability to invoke an executive type of privilege is much weaker than someone who is -- is gotten attorney-client privilege but will he not for conversations that he has with the foreign leader. he doesn't represent the foreign leader. so i hope there is nothing there because he is going to a much harder time exerting a privilege. spewing great to see you in washington. thank you so much. their pricing in the community ag for answers on why the requirements for a whistle-blower complaint and get into that. they chain claim that the ig removed the requirements for whistle-blowers to have first hand knowledge of that alleged wrongdoing. another complaint against trump is based completely on secondhand accounts. quote, the timing raises question about potential connection to this whistle-blowers complaint and potential criminality in the

handling of these matters. joining me now, one of the letter's signatories, house until committee ranking member, devin nunes. congressman, the ig tonight pushing back against claims saying the whistle-blower did present first-hand information. quote, the whistle-blower stated on the form that he or she possess both first-hand and other information. the ig review the info and provided other information gathered and determined the plate was both urgent and appeared credible good what's your response? >> i'm glad we finally have a response from the ig. remember, this leaked out last friday. the dni refused to respond to it so finally because of the pressure put on this morning, we are getting an answer from the inspector general but i would say this. i haven't seen any evidence of that so if he has firsthand knowledge, he or she, where is that evidence? just because the ig said so, they haven't provided us that

evidence and furthermore, he didn't answer anything in that press release that we asked in our letter today so he has until thursday to provide us the facts, the evidence, the emails. because they admit that they changed this regulation. this guideline. they changed it because of this whistle-blower. he admits it in his own press release. so the mainstream is trying to cover this up. the inspector general, he may be happy with the press he reads in the mainstream media become thursday, if he doesn't provide the actual evidence of all the communications, we will see him on friday and we will interview him on this and as we said, we think this is very suspicious between the changing of the guidelines and the leaks that there is some criminality involved here. >> "the washington post," i believe, is giving you four pinocchio's for the claim.

because i do that every day though. we have two sets of media in this country. the mainstream media and then the media that's actually trying to get to the truth. >> the rules were either changed or not. that's an objective question, is it not? >> they were change that's a fact. he admits in his three-page response today, a press release, that they did in fact change of because of this whistle-blower. >> what i am very concerned about is the purposeful misstatement and this is done with malign purpose. misstatement, missed characterization of what the president actually said and i call which was about our relationship and the friendship on the money they spent, europe is not giving enough money, europe is imparting out, mentioned rudy giuliani, but

nancy pelosi took a page, i reckon through this with sol earlier, from what -- adam schiff's book. in her interview with 60 minutes. watch. >> it's wrong for a president to say that he wants another head of state to create something negative about his possible political opponent to his own advantage at the expense of the national security. >> laura: okay. congressman, this is an impeachable crown transgression. why do they keep making up details about the transcript? why? >> they have to make it up because there is no evidence there. this was all concocted. they are rushing to impeachment. they want to get impeachment on before december. why? because they know if they go into next year and drive the country through it, it will

continue to be a loser so they have to move fast. one thing they learned with the mueller probe is that the longer it's out there, it started to rot and smell and likely a lot of those people are gonna be in trouble. they want to move fast with this, they want to come in hot, they want to get this done. they have the media whipped up into a frenzy and they're getting -- this is about raising money. they're going to have to impeach because they promised the day's. this basically blocks themselves in. >> i have another theory. a lot of these swing democrats wrongly think this is going to get them primary it up by an aoc plus three type candidate. this is like their insurance policy forgetting primary to the left. >> there is actually two different members beauty of those that are that in the swing districts but you also have veterans who are being challenged by the aoc's.

>> laura: bingo. it congressman, thanks so much. coming up, the left is hyping a new impeachment pole but should they be? if anything it shows the country it is not at all ready for impeachment mania. corey lewandowski, they dissect the median as next. >> vo: so when my windshield broke... i found the experts at safelite autoglass. they have exclusive technology and service i can trust. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪

one democrats and the media have been working overtime to change the narrative on impeachment and their hyping two new pools to claim victory. first, new cvs poll showing 55% of americans back to house impeachment inquiry but the same poll also found 53% of voters see this as a democrat attempts to hurt trump's 2020 bid. second, while at quinnipiac poll shows 47% support impeachment, it also finds 56% of voters believe that lawmakers supporting it are doing so based on partisan politics, not the facts. so contrary to media narrative, america is really clamoring for an impeachment fight? >> no way. to discuss, corey lewandowski. it already come to the left is going gaga on these poles. you and i have been on this mound for way too long. what are they doing here and in cherry picking their factoid in

this poll and won an apple? >> you remember this in the 2016 election. i just want to remind your viewers tonight. october 172016. cbs news said had to head match clinton defeats donald trump 51-40 and a complete blowout. obviously three weeks later, donald trump wins the election and still look. these poles are driven by what they think the actual american people want to see. they try to set the narrative. they media is no longer just reporting the news, they are making the news and what they want to do in my opinion is they want to get the american people behind this impeachment by saying american support this by a large. this is something we all want so go ahead and move forward. you have their support. it's all gonna backfire. >> laura: are they doing the media the usual pole shuffle here? like you keep pulling until you get the results you want. people voted for brexit 2016 and they still don't have brexit. they do this all the time but do they think this is going to be

useful to them? >> they do and they always use the word inquiry not impeachment. americans are for inquiring about anything but not impeaching the president and nancy pelosi, i could see tactically she think she does something smart because she gave into this left-wing days aoc. she has an election coming up that she thinks trump is going to win. time is running out. but this is one of the stupidest things and political history. strategically, long term, but what she has done is she's taken out the front runner in the democratic party was joe biden who was pulling strongest against trump. you can't use the word ukraine without bringing in biden's name. then there so many unknown unknowns. we don't know the extent of biden and ukraine. we don't know the extent of hunter biden in china. all of that is going to come out with the release of documents. who knows what the chinese or ukrainians are going to say. we don't know the whistle-blower. who is he? if he comes in before a congressional committee under

oath and ask him how you talk to adam schiff, have you talked to his lawyers? have you talked to the dnc? did you have lawyers help you? when did you submit this? then we have these ongoing investigations. we have attorney general barr talking to foreign countries, we have john huber, we have john drum, we have horowitz. these are all -- this is not a stable new cycle. >> laura: they think they can gain it all out and pelosi was pressed on this fact. she is pressed on this but she's worried that it's going to hurt democrats and she tried to take the high road. watch. >> do you have any anxiety at all about any of the stuff we are talking about or anything that we are not talking about impacting your ability to hold control of the house in 2020 question mike >> it doesn't matter. our first responsibility is to protect and defend the constitution. we will win again with the

democratic majority in the house. >> laura: she's not thinking politics at all. it's all high-minded inquiry. >> of course it is and it's what he just said about joe biden taking the front runner out. he's absolutely right. that i just received from my friends joe biden's meeting in 2016 with the prime minister of ukraine. this is it right here. 100% redacted. this is the next one. it says all. the rest, 100% redacted. the possible deliverables for the prime minister meeting with the vice president, 100% redacted. 100% redacted. this is all information that joe biden has to answer to you because what we know is he used his position of influence to try to save his son to end an investigation and that's what this is really about. at the democrats don't want to actually work for donald trump. they want to use that as a crutch. >> laura: even like i think it

was politico back in may 2017. they were starting to talk about biden never having to answer question about ukraine and wanted to make all this money over there and it kind of danced around and i think they thought it would all go away but those facts are going to have to come out and hunter biden will have to emerge from hiding. i don't know where he is but maybe he is with hurley's emails. who knows. but he's going to have to emerge at some point. >> all you have to do is read the atlantic or the new yorker and they'd provided the evidence and another known known is coming up. we have nine more of these democratic debates. every time they get on stage and they argue about taking guns away. trump's poles go up three to four points and so they

understood that gradually they were eroding any idea that they were moderate and we've got nine more to come and nancy pelosi is going to be conducting an impeachment hearing on tv, and inquiry may be, and then we will have the democrats debates and people will say they're going to be on sunday. he's the only thing between us and socialism. the one we will have you both back when all that happens if that happens with thank you very much. both of you. i want to read those reactions. that's a lot of blank boxes there. coming up, the biden campaign making news networks to blacklist but that won't end the ukraine trouble. explaining why biden and his team should be very worried about one of the doj's ongoing investigations we just talked about, next.

>> it's laughable that joe biden has done anything wrong. because you still still have a bunch of wackos out there who read this nonsense. >> laura: wackos, deplorable, despicable, that is the real echo chamber. no evidence, biden didn't do anything wrong. while despite what the left may want, biden's ukraine trouble is just beginning. they are going away anytime soo

soon. armor attorney general mike mckay's he reminds us that in a new op-ed, what the prosecutors found might be quite different from what the democrats are looking for. joining me now, kevin brock, former assistant fbi director. kevin, let's start with you. what can you tell us about u.s. attorney john drum's investigation? ongoing regarding ukraine? because you know, attorney general barr asked u.s. attorney jerome to look into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation against the trump campaign and attorney general barr is absolutely correct to be asking for assistance for that investigation. the indicators, we have discussed this many times on your show, the indicators are that james comey and his partners initiated that investigation outside of the attorney general's guidelines. they may have abused other policies and procedures by

targeting u.s. citizens with sources, confidential sources, completely outside of the guidelines, this is what mr. jerome is looking at and some of these tentacles go overseas. they go into the -- asking for cooperation in this investigation is entirely prudent and correct. >> laura: it would make sense that the ag is going to call ahead of the u.s. attorney who most people wouldn't know who he was so all of that -- anyone who has any experience in government know that was a crime and robert, to you -- the media are in denial about ukraine's involvement in the 2016 meddling but here's what politico reported. i alluded to it earlier in 2017. ukrainian efforts to sabotage trump backfired. key of officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost clinton. it robert, the media seem really

intent on disregarding even their own reporting here. >> all it shows is that cnn and msnbc got the democratic party's talking points. they are not really serious about an investigation and so far politically what they have said is essentially impeach, recuse, and malign. they have tried that with regard to and they are going to try that with god to the president. they have tried to encourage the attorney general to recuse and undermine his credibility and the final thing is to sort of malign any legitimate investigation looking into the ukrainian connection as part of the investigation about the origins of the russia investigation that led to the investigation of the president and the appointment of the special counsel and the great news here is that the careful what you ask for because the avalanches coming. in october, michael horowitz is likely to release this report and in the midst of all of that,

they will likely be referrals to the department of justice for the prosecution and at the same time john drum is conducting an investigation ending in attorney general's dead serious about the fact that he is going to get to the bottom of this which is an entirely legitimate theme and as you suggest, that does not mean that the former vice president joe biden who is a current presidential candidate is immune from legitimate investigation. >> laura: i want to go to you kevin because that point is so important and doesn't seem reminiscent of what happened in the lead up to barr? the leaks, other leaks, this is how the deep state operates and i think robert is exactly right. when all these investigations come to fruition, it's like oh, no, we have already gone over that. that's the fruit of the poisonous trump tree. that's what they want to say and that would be a huge disservice

to anyone who supposedly cares about election interference because it was done at the hands of the clintons, ukraine, and all of these other foreign powers that didn't want someone like donald trump to win. he was a great disruptor. >> they are starting to use terms like conspiracy theory. this has to be done. it is vitally important for this country to get to the bottom of whether or not the agencies of the executive branch, the fbi, the cia, misty was there authorities over used by leadership in those agencies to misuse authority and launch an illicit counterintelligence investigation. we have to know the truth on this. >> laura: rudy giuliani also dropped something that didn't get a lot of notice during his interview on abc yesterday. >> how about if i tell you over the next week a little more about this and they will all be

investigated? they've been online for six months and the washington press will not accept the fact that joe biden may have done -- >> laura: how many affidavits will it take for the media to cover this story? >> this is where i disagree with rudy. my answer to that is it will be investigated now and like your primary stomach prior guests, i am not going to preach the outc. this is what we have investigations for. i care deeply about legitimate law enforcement investigations that are conducted on a nonpartisan basis and michael meek hazily assures us based on reputation that john drum enjoys in both political parties that he is a professional and he is going to find out some answers. >> laura: just to wrap this up, tucker carlson gave us a little nugget. i want to put it up on the

screen. it's a picture of joe biden golfing with devon archer, the ukraine gas company executive, back in 2016. that's hunter, joe, ukrainian gas company. i mean, joe has been very interested in the ukraine for a long, long time. including who is bugging and who is getting the hole-in-one. it's all copacetic. all right gentlemen, thank you so much for our next guest tonight is a former cia analyst and a whistle-blower himself. now he claims to know who is behind the complaint, who they were close to in the obama administration, most importantly, what it says about the legitimacy of all of that, next.

>> laura: the democrats impeachment case against trump hinges on secondhand allegations. from an anonymous whistle-blower and the intel community. who is this whistle-blower and is he or she working alone? joining me now, kevin schiff, a former cia analyst and a whistle-blower himself. all right kevin, we have is we don't out the whistle-blower. well, were not going to do that. but you say you know a troubling association he or she has with the former obama officials and how do you know or how do you think you know who it is?

>> thanks for having me. i wrote several analytical reports with the cia and i was a classifying authority and i can tell you with certainty that this person, man or lady, is not a whistle-blower. they are leaker and if you read the statement, which i'm not convinced that the leaker actually wrote, but if you read a statement, it's based on nothing but hearsay and terrible accusations against the president of the united states that are not substantiated by anything even in the statement, the so-called whistle-blower says 12 times that he had no direct evidence to what he is saying. 18 times that he overheard the evidence from quote unquote several u.s. government officials never mentioning their name or their identities at all and if this was a court case, as you know, based on hearsay, the judge would throw it out.

also from examining this whistle-blower statement i think it's clear at least to me that it was not written by the whistle-blower. i think it was written by -- >> laura: you don't have to work for the cia to know that. that was written by some lawyer on the hill or someone else or her lawyer who knows how to file things but i want to get back to the obama connection. i think it's important. why do you think the connection must go back to obama folks because why? >> for example, this whistle-blower was detailed to the white house with access to these transcripts, these presidential transcripts, and he was detailed by the then director of the cia john brennan who we know is at the center of the soft coup against the president of the united states so that in itself i think needs to be looked into and most alarmingly at least to me, having been in the cia, is the fact that the whistle-blower complaint form properly prohibited hearsay information

as it should and yet secretly without anybody knowing that the complaint form was changed and altered to allow unbelievably hearsay in other words second or third party information for this kind of complaint. we know now that that was done in august of 2019 and we know -- >> laura: they are claiming that she said she had both firsthand and secondhand concerns or information which was not how it was originally reported, not from what i see in the complaint itself but i would agree with you on the way it's characterized. we have a pool in the office. i'm betting and you are betting it's a guy. i bet it's a girl. a lady. that's my guess. i don't know why, just a hunch. just my hunch. trump told reporters today that he wants to find out the identity of the whistle-blower

and it sent the media into a frothy frenzy. watch. >> we are trying to find out about a whistle-blower. >> serious concerns with the safety of him or her president trump has attacked and threatened to that person. speak of the president, by saying he wants to meet and presumably out the whistle-blower, is suggesting a violation of the law. >> it's also a violation of the whistle-blower act. >> your reaction? >> yes. in the first place, this is not a whistle-blower, it's a leaker. what they slyly did is they took this plant with false information and they put him or her under the cover of the whistle-blower statute so they couldn't be investigated and it couldn't be pursued and that obviously was a deep state operation to put out false accusations against donald trump using the whistle-blower statute after changing it and it's just another attempt in my view to

impeach president donald trump. >> again, that line of chuck schumer's keeps coming back. the deep state wants to get you and i will find a way. trump was a disrupter and they didn't like the fact that he was a disrupter. kevin, fascinating analysis. everyone's dying to know who it is because we kind of want to know if there are any political motivations behind it. we appreciate it. coming up, the same day we held our chicago town hall, democratic mayor lori lightfoot sent her police department a memo outlining dangerous distractions on cooperating with i.c.e. tom homer has a message for the mayor. you don't want to miss that. >> vo: my car is my after-work decompression zone. ♪ music >> vo: so when my windshield broke... i found the experts at safelite autoglass. they have exclusive technology and service i can trust.

>> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ (drum roll) and the record for longest-lasting aa battery goes to... (cymbal crash) energizer ultimate lithium. guinness world records title holder for longest-lasting aa battery.

>> laura: believe it or not, the impeachment procession is in the only thing happening in the news, there's a lot of important stuff happening. we held a town hall last friday. if you didn't see it, you better dvr the show. we expose the city's failed democratic leadership and we heard from residents themselves about what they really wanted on their leaders. >> we need economic opportunities and i think that's what's been missing from the democratic platform. >> make sure they replace their

government with hammers, making sure they get jobs and opportunities and contracts. >> my firm was taking from me. it's no mother's job to deal with that. >> laura: the $15,000 workers market $20,000 now. it brings me to our next story, one we touched on friday night, chicago mayor lori lightfoot dangerous hatred and i'm going to say, hatred, for i.c.e. today fox news exclusively obtained an internal chicago pd memo dated september 27th, the same day we were there, and the memo says that effective immediately, all officers must leave the scene of an apprehension if asked by federal agents to assist with arresting or detaining emigrants. joining me as tom homan, former acting as director. tom, we thought rahm emanuel was bad in chicago. but mayor lightfoot is giving him a run for his money as far as standing up for criminal

aliens. against her own and over her own constituents i might add. >> she didn't do her around her homework. 90% of i.c.e. arrests in the streets are criminals. to instruct the officers not to instruct the officers and keeping the community safe, it's disgusting and her use of the word racism during a press event, i'm sick and tired of that democratic leadership in congress using the term racism toward these men and women of i.c.e. who are simply enforcing a law arresting people here in violation of federal law that were removed by a federal lodge. there's nothing racist about it but they can't argue the facts and it's disgusting. i'm sick and tired of listening to it. >> laura: it's just admitting you can't argue the point. you might as well just say i give up. i give up and i can't argue the point you are a racist. people i think all across the

country are getting really sick of it, tired of it, and because you mentioned mayor lightfoot's comments, let's let our viewers listen. >> we are not going to tolerate letting i.c.e. terrorize our immigrants and refugee communities. we will never, ever succumb to the racist xenophobic rhetoric of i.c.e. we will continue to ban i.c.e. from having access to any databases who would not allow any cpd officer to cooperate with anything related to i.c.e. and its immigration rates. they want to have a question. are all of those hispanic i.c.e. officials and african-american i.c.e. officials, are they racist you? wow. >> it's ridiculous and one has been okay for members of congress and members of the city -- i thought hate groups were something they wanted to legislate against but in my last couple testimonies on the hill,

members of the democratic party has created their own hate groups against law enforcement specifically on i.c.e. and mayor lightfoot needs to know this. i.c.e. has arrested thousands of public safety threats offers streets that they release from their sanctuary jails that re-offended against u.s. citizens. you're welcome. it would be nice if you just say thank you i.c.e. for keeping my community safe. but i want to leave this one message. i promised the officers and i.c.e. will never turn their back there we will never turn our back on chicago police department. i'm not a nice director anymore but i talked to the instructor and he agreed with me. we will never turn our back on another law enforcement agent. >> laura: mayor lightfoot, i hope you're watching are one of your pals tells you to tune into that as a message you must not forget that when we come back, left-wing politicians bucking up to china

>> the communist party wants to stay in power in china. they listen to the public. the public says, i can't breathe the air, he is not a dictator,

he needs to satisfy his continuance or he won't survive. >> is not a dictator? >> no, he is against has a constituency to answer to. no government survives without the will and majority of its people. >> the idea that the chinese government is responsible for a democratic expression of fresh, fresh air, clean air -- >> of course they are. >> laura: just has a constituency. they have to vote for him. unbelievable. well, that is all the time we have tonight. shannon bream and the "fox news @ night" team take it all from here. >> shannon: we will try to pick it up. news developing minute-by-minute. laura, we are honored. we begin tonight with a fox news alert. late breaking news about the investigation into the investigators as democrats widen their impeachment probed by subpoenaing l'oeil or rudy giuliani. and nail down a hearing with the whistle-blower. we are also hearing more from justice department officials about john durham's probe into the possible misconduct by the

intelligence community during the origins.