everybody in that room agrees. thank you so much and good to have you here, deron washington. >> thank you. >> martha: that is where we and "the story." "the story" goes on tomorrow night, see you then. ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight" tonight. looking back january of 2017, it seems like another age. so much has happened in the year since then, but in other ways not that much has changed at all. donald trump and not even taken the oath of office yet, but by the first week of the new year of 2017, i guess don't remember, he had already committed to destroying his presidency and trump seem to know it. a little after 8:00 p.m. on the night of january 3rd 2017 the president-elect wrote a tweet, he took a veiled dig at u.s. intelligence agencies and their handling of the newly initiated russian investigation.

pretty much the same moment, chuck schumer of new york was an manhattan studio's. he went to the set and the anchor of the show he was on that night, rachel maddow hold up his tweet on a screen, live on tv and asked chuck schumer to comment on that. he ends in the week before and he couldn't have known it was coming, for one of the more calculating politicians in washington, it was a rare unscripted moment. so for the first time in a long time chuck schumer went with the unvarnished truth. watch what he said. >> you take on the intelligence community, then six ways from sunday of getting back at you. even for practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman he is being really dumb to do this. >> tucker: chuck schumer went on to say he didn't know exactly what the spy agencies were due a donald trump as punishment for being dumb enough to criticize them in public, but he warned

and this is verbatim quote, from what i am told they are very upset about how he has treated them and talked about them. very upset. got it? there is no mistaking what that was. that's a threat issued on live television with grave seriousness by a politician who has been in washington long enough to know that it's absolutely real. in the end donald trump ignored it, or more likely he decided to defy it. day after day he gave the finger to the permanent washington establishment come on and off twitter, sometimes at press conferences, but always with unmistakable relish. he acted like a man who had won in election in a democratic country and he seemed to feel free to say exactly what he thought. he didn't appear to believe the intelligence agencies had veto power over his agenda. in a thousand different ways the new president refused to bow and for that crime more than any other crime, he was punished. most recently by the manufacturer in ukraine scandal.

the intel world has become defiant, just yesterday at the former cei director john brennan expressed outrage that anyone would ever dare oversight that secretly oversee our lives. >> i'm supposedly going to be interviewed by mr. durham as there is no investigation. william barr when he was testifying in front of congress at a didn't understand the predication of the counterintelligence investigation that was launched into russian's interference in the 2016 election. i don't understand the predication of this worldwide effort to try and cover dirt, either real or imagined that we discredit that investigation in 2016 and the russian interference. >> tucker: john brennan is a naked partisan and he is a liar. he has acted in ways that would have shocked and horrified previous director is not saying a lot. john brennan is not ashamed, far from what he is proud and so are as many accolades in washington. philmont is a former cia employee like so many partisans

from intelligence world he is no contributor at cnn. last night he sent an on air warning to the president and his lawyer, back off or prepared to get hurt. >> i spent a lot of time in government. there are state department officials will testify come and tell guys, department, department of defense people come all of us are a brotherhood and sisterhood. rudy giuliani parachutes and from mars. the people who will testify are going to look at him including state department officials and say, i don't have to protect that guy. he didn't operate by the rules. he didn't do what you were supposed to do in government. i suspect he is worried about what the congress will do. if i were him i would be worried about what the people and government stick a shiv in his back. he's in trouble. >> tucker: it's a brotherhood says phil, the cia, a brotherhood that will stab you to death if you disobey. what he is describing is not a conventional government agency, nothing like what most of us imagine when we think about what

washington is doing on our behalf. the ca of john brennan and phil mudd does not exist for our benefit, and exist for the benefit of the people who work there. we pay for the whole thing, but they do what they want and they punish anyone who criticizes them. they brag about that. now that is scary, a perversion of democracy and with the people who created the cia feared most. it's also -- if or when to be honest, it's annoying because for all of the hype, the cia and the end isn't even very good at its job. remember, this is an intelligence agency! it's fair to judge their performance against whether or not they predicted crucial events over the past 70 years. again and again, they didn't. the cia for example was shocked by the korean war. they didn't predict the soviet atomic bomb, not a small thing. they missed the cuban missile crisis and the israeli war, they spent decades trying to bring

down fidel castro -- to kill fidel castro, so naturally has a resume ever felt. he lived into his 90s. the cia spent decades propping up the shell of iran so naturally he tumbled from power. they did provide a warning before because he had no idea. when the iron curtain finally fell in 1989 the ci was completely blindsided by it, they thought they predicted in fact the soviet union wasn't strong as ever. things didn't get better after that. the cia had no idea that saddam hussein planned to evade the way the next year, they were surprised by india's atomic bomb test eight years later. but 2003 they were totally confident that iraq had weapons of mass destruction. in fact, to biggest success might've been crating the taliban. if john brennan had been working for a nonprofit business there would have been a shareholder revolt a long time ago and probably criminal charges. he would have been john delorean. because it's a secretive government agency, the ca has

not been restrained, in fact it's only become more powerful and more autonomous spirit powerful enough to take on a president? we will see. one reason the permanent washington is so powerful, so resistant to change or oversight is that it makes alliances with some of the least impressive, but most vicious members of congress. days ago adam schiff claimed his office had no contact whatsoever with the ci whistle-blower. >> first off, have you heard from the whistle-blower? do you want to hear from the whistle-blower? >> we have not spoken directly with the whistle-blower. we would like to. >> tucker: he also claimed to know nothing about what was in the whistle-blower's complaint before it came out, but yesterday "the new york times" revealed that both of those claims were allied. he apologized and away saying that he "should have been much more clear." right. he now admits his office spoke to the whistle-blower who by the way is a registered democrat. ian says his office did nothing

to shape the complaint itself. i would be believe that? devin nunes is right in the middle of all this, the ranking republican on the intel committee and he joins us tonight. the former chairman. thank you for coming on. do you believe this explanation? >> no. this explanation? no. >> tucker: and looks from the perspective on the people from the outside like adam schiff's office guided this complaint lie it was a set up. >> it looked like he knew something before hand because this was in the press and then ui and stories written by gbs reporters and then you fast-forward and he had a couple of times that he could have told us in private that this had happened. nothing buy a lot makes him -- he didn't have to tell us, but he clearly gave no indication that he had ever met with the whistle-blower or anybody on his team had ever met with the whistle-blower. that's the real issue here. two opportunities -- two

opportunities behind closed doors and he didn't tell us. >> tucker: this is not one among many stories. this is the basis for the impeachment of the president of united states. it's not a small thing, it's the opposite of that. how can any of us have confidence that this isn't a pure partisan invention? >> it is and it's not a real impeachment the way that impeachment processes work, the other time it has been used. i came from the capital and we had nine hours of ambassador, if you listen to the mainstream media, this was going to be the guy that was going to give up all the goods on rudy giuliani because this was the special envoy to ukraine on behalf of the trump administration. of course they went on and on and on. why did they keep going on and on? they weren't getting what they wanted to. i came in there at the end and i felt horrible for the man. he has been a public servant and is getting married in a few weeks and he wants this to be done with spirit he would know that by number one, before his

testimony and what has leaked o. >> tucker: i have to ask you, you were in charge of the oversight of the caa and other intel agencies as the house of the intelligence committee, do you feel that our intelligence agencies are properly overseen by the congress? does the congress -- doesn't democracy have control? >> i think you could argue over the fbi's counterintelligence area that started this investigation into the trump campaign, no. a zero. the fbi has not cooperated throughout this investigation. perhaps with what the attorney general is doing running the investigation into the beginnings of the russian probe, yes. with the cia, i think the challenges have been -- will republicans have been pushing, you have to remember these agents put their lives on the line. the people that are out in the field. the challenge you have is that they are way too many

intelligence officials and consultants and former agents now pontificating on networks that live here in the swamp. look, there is a reason to have a small country of folks here, and i can't give the number, but i can tell you that the majority of people are here in the swamp which is not where they should be. >> tucker: of course not. the majority? really? >> i think it would be the majority. when you take the department of defense, cia, dni. >> tucker: they are hanging around the capital city. >> lobbying for more money for their programs. i tell you, one thing tha people forget, i was the wall and ironically in the spring of 16 when they're opening the investigation into the trump campaign for colluding with russians, i went out and said the biggest intelligence was our ability to understand vladimir putin's plans and intentions. in the spring of 2016 and of

course you know what they did to me, the press corps in this town and the democrats. >> tucker: i was a secret russil along. >> tucker: we work medicating securely in russian when we met the park. great to see you. the former fbi deputy director of counterterrorism and he joins us. thank you for coming on tonight. you hear former intel officials threatened elected leaders with punishment for disobeying bureaucrats, what is your reaction to that? >> it's just sickening to watch that and i want to make sure i say right away tucker that i am not part of any brotherhood with schiff and i can pretty much tell you neither is anyone i've ever worked with spirit most of the guys there today and ladies -- i doubt there would be anything that would appalled that he said last night. you have to put it in perspective and look at the last two years.

for the last two years john brennan and phil mudd, many people as devin nunes talked about have gone on television and have essentially called the president of united states a russian agent and we don't have time to get into it, but most of those people had no room talking about anything like that because they had plenty of problems themselves. anybody who would start reading about them would know that. this is really awful and we are here, it's interesting, we've come full circle. we started with the intelligence community and adam schiff a couple of years ago and russia and now we are back, only we are here with him in charge of the intelligence committee and we are talking about ukraine. what strikes out that any person who is has worked cases, real i agents, most of us learn from my mentor or the fbi academy or in our first field office, when you want to do an investigation and get to the bottom of something,

look for what is abnormal. find out what the normal is whether it's a company, group, whatever and then find the abnormal. all along we saw the abnormalities in this. it began with susan rice. she and the unmasking. i was in the fbi 30 years, i worked nothing but the national security cases and i never made a request. i never have a politician make any kind of a request to unmask any case that i've been working on. that is abnormal and then she got on tv and said in 2017 and in a direct response to judy woodruff lied about it. she was asked, you know anything about what devin nunes said? see should i don't know anything and you see that play out in al. christopher steele was closed as an fbi asset, that's the term in the counterintelligence for an informant and then he was worked by the department of justice attorney. totally abnormal. >> tucker: the country changed a lot under the obama administration for eight years

in ways that we are just now coming to understand. thank you so much. >> thank you. >> tucker: democrats were screaming for impeachment, sometimes literally before donald trump took office, rashida tlaib is selling and phd mother t-shirts, but nancy pelosi still wants you to doubt that impeachment really was a final resort. it's a very, very sad thing. she keeps telling us that. she is so sad it turned out this way. she would like you to pray with her about it. >> this is a very serious challenge that the president has put there. it's very sad. it's sad. this is a very sad time for our country. this is no cause for any joy. this is a very sad time for our country. it's really sad. we have to be very prayerful. i pray for the president all the time. this is a very sad time for our country. this is no joy in this, it's

sad. >> tucker: [laughter] the best! news anchors, the, the robots, they nod vacantly when she said we have to pray for president trout. it's very sad. i haven't been that sad since old yeller died. richard steen is a former advisor and he joins us but how sad are you? are you a status or a speaker? >> my reaction to this is there's a lot of projection that happens between trump supporter's and i think here is a case where they can't quite fathom that a speaker could feel this because i never felt anything like this around the clinton impeachment. you never heard a soul on the republican side feel any sense of remorse for going after him, try to kick him out of office, talk about a coup because he had sex i didn't want to talk about it. >> tucker: that's true, i was there, that's right. if you were to ask republicans in washington now including the

republican and washington who led the impeachment charge, of course and the speaker of the house newt gingrich. we just talked about this. all of them would tell you it was a mistake and all of them would express regret. they don't like clinton, but that was on a good idea. i wonder like since you brought that up, two years from now are democrats going to say it was a wise idea to make up this ludicrous, unbelievably dumb story about ukraine? nobody really has their heart and it dared to think in two years democrats are going to say, that was smart? >> here is a thing about the whole hoax business about ukraine, is the president's words. whether the whistle-blower is an r or d or came from mars, never they blew the whistle about, we see the transcript incidentally it's an abbreviated version because he doesn't come close to being 30 minutes worth of words. >> tucker: what do you think is missing? >> you tell me. >> tucker: left her mark >>

the rep public is more inclined to say i think you should be impeached. >> tucker: it so sad. let me ask you quickly. do you really think that the transcription office at the white house is collaborating the conspiracy run by donald trump to hide who knows what, the agreement he reached with the president of ukraine? seriously? >> we know they try to hide it. >> tucker: you think there is relevant information? >> we have the rosemary gap from nixon that's what they revealed and want to hide ultimately was. the public now thinks he should be impeached for it. what we have seen -- >> tucker: there is an election in a year and you don't like tromp, that is the referendum. as a democracy. >> if it was having sex with an intern, but he is trying to get china and ukraine to make sure we don't have a fair election.

he said that today. >> tucker: at the democrats in the past 30 years gave away our entire country with the help of corporate republicans to china and other light, is with china! the only president to take down china in american history. >> hats off to him for doing that incidentally but i'm just saying, for seeking help to help them went back, that's a problem. >> tucker: great to see you. mark steyn will be here in just a minute, also congresswoman and aoc squad member, rashida tlaib said people need to hire based on skin color, were not exaggerating. we have it. plus, can you beat are two new professionals and a member and everything that happened this week? "final exam" is just around the corner. ♪ from the couldn't be prouders

to the wait did we just win-ners. everyone uses their phone differently. that's why xfinity mobile let's you design your own data. now you can share it between lines. mix with unlimited, and switch it up at anytime so you only pay for what you need. it's a different kind of wireless network designed to save you money. save up to $400 a year on your wireless bill. plus get $250 back when you buy an eligible phone.

call, click, or visit a store today. ♪ >> tucker: democratic congresswoman rashida tlaib made an astonishing demand today. frank back jim crow, sean people hired or fired from their job solely based on their skin color. remarkable. cheap breaking news correspondent trace gallagher has more on this. >> congress member rashida tlaib is on the record saying she opposes facial recognition technology because she thinks it misidentifies a disproportionate numbers of darker skinned people even on the technology works on facial measurements and not race or gender. when the detroit police department started using the technology and its new crime center, she quoted, "they should use and rethink this whole facial recognition b.s., though she use the whole word.

the police chief invited her down for a tour which became combative. watch. >> i think nonafrican-americans nonafrican-americans -- it's the same and i seen it from the floor. people calling elijah cummings john lewis and john lewis elijah cummings and their solely different people. >> he responded that they trust people who are trained regardless of their race, but she again pushed the idea of a built-in bias. the chief later said many of his staff members black-and-white told him they were outraged by her remarks. tucker. >> tucker: thank you. crag is the chief of police and the city of police and he joins us. thank you for coming on tonight. >> how are you doing? love to be here. >> tucker: what did you make of this demand from the congresswoman? >> it's disturbing. there is nothing to it. the key points that keep getting

missed in the conversation over facial recognition as we understand that the technology is flawed. we have built in safeguards and i can't speak for other police departments, but the safeguards are that we have trained analysts, professionals and then it's peer-reviewed by a second analyst and then only after that does a supervisor come in and concur with their findings. we understand that we have the technology, there's going to be message notifications and we recognize that. what she misses is that she never talks about the victims and the cases that we saw -- and pretty big cases involving mass murder suspects, it's almost as if, doesn't really matter? it's a deflection and hence constant and most detroiters today would tell you, not just detroiters, but across the country over the last 48 hours i have gotten so many messages

from americans saying we support you. we know what you are doing, stand your ground. >> tucker: just to be clear, your employees who screened this information and interpret the data i don't have to be of a specific race in order to do their jobs? >> absolutely not. they can get the same training. they are professionals and do know what it's akin to? it's almost them saying, a white police officer cannot work in an african-american community. i've been in this business 42 years and i've always worked in diverse police departments, l.a. for example, black-and-white policed officers working together effectively. that doesn't mean there individuals that they will do bad things. black, white, brown. her statement based on nothing, she provided me a -- what she called the peer review study

about why blacks tend to better recognize other blocks, but what is missing in the study is that it has nothing to do with the professional training that analysts get and as you indicated tucker, measurements. it's on a boat race. it's biometric training based on measurements. >> tucker: exactly. i should point out that you are the police chief in portland, maine. one of the widest cities in america. very popular and very successful chief of police there. it's about race. thank you so much for coming on tonight. i appreciate that. >> thank you tucker. >> tucker: it's been an unexpectedly tough year for the front runner joe biden, his demographic profile is decades out of date for the party wants to lead. something he didn't realize but since learned. elizabeth warnick is now leading him in iowa and new hampshire. his parties plan to impeach tromp goes around highlighting

his own family scription, that's on a good thing. is it over for joe biden? he says it's not. in a soliloquy last night he said he is not giving up. >> let me make something clear to mr. tromp in the special interests funding his attacks against me, i'm not going anywhere. [applause] you are not going to destroy me and you're not going to destroy my family. we have to do more than beat donald trump. we have to beat him like a drum. >> tucker: that was the verbatim -- that's what he actually said, but we will concede to us at sounded more like this. ♪ and i am telling you. ♪ i'm not going. ♪ >> tucker: author and columnist mark steyn always has music in his head and he joins us tonight.

joe biden -- you have watched, i would say you are professional biden connoisseur, but you watched him closely for three decades. where you now on joe biden? >> i'm where i was on the original broadway run of "dream girls." she tells you, i'm telling you, i'm not going for 15 minutes not the end she goes. that's going to be the same thing here. joe biden can say, i'm telling you, i'm not going but -- by the way, when he said it like that it reminded me of a character on ellen degeneres' old sitcom who get sick and her boyfriend takes her hand and says, don't worry, i'm going nowhere. the character and she says back to her boyfriend, that's a whole other issue. when joe biden says he's going nowhere, he is right, but that's a whole other issue. >> tucker: [laughs]

there is a kind of sadness about this. looking back and it's always clear of course in retrospect, but biden was never going to be the nominee, was he? >> now and i think in part because what has happened and recent days confirms that. last time around the democratic enthusiasm was for bernie who was full-blown socialism and so-called moderation and centrism was represented by a kleptocratic bracket which was hillary and the clinton foundation. now we have the same situation. there is bernie. elizabeth warren. there is younger, prettier bernie in the seven dwarves and all the rest of them and centrist moderation is represented by another corrupt kleptocratic. there is no reason why hunter biden, a middle-aged man who should have moved out of his

father's home by now should be riding around on air force two. there shouldn't be an air force two, but that's another issue. if there is an air force to drain, he shouldn't be jetting into china and ukraine. joe biden and his first campaign plagiarized the welsh labour party leader and said he was the first biden in a thousand generations to go to college pretty so that line. hunter biden is the first biden and a thousand generations to become a ukrainian oligarch and trump is perfectly capable of hanging that around his father's neck all the way to election. >> tucker: i think that's exactly right. i think a lot of the trump people are worried most about biden, but i think you would be the easiest to beat for them. >> absolutely and i think he is not where the party is. you would have the same issue is that hillary had. i noticed today he says, never

mind iowa and new hampshire, he has a super tuesday firewall. i had an email from mike murphy, jeb bush's campaign consultant to that effect, exactly for two years ago saying the same thing. trump maite win and new hampshire, but we've got everything after that. >> tucker: they don't believe it, when they say it, they don't believe it. poor biden. mark steyn, great to see you and thank you for that. >> thanks a lot tucker. >> tucker: a small group of volunteers managed to clear 50 tons of trash off the streets of los angeles in a single day. it's on the california budget isn't big enough to afford things like this. why haven't they tried to? the organizer of that event joins us next. ♪

>> tucker: we have a very intense final exam face up and just a minute.

sorry to brag, but we do. stay tuned for that. first, california is one of the most heavily taxed states in the nation and that's one reason the middle class has led to so many other states leaving by the day, but despite that huge tax burden, the government can't keep the streets clean. far from it, los angeles, san francisco are sinking under a tide of garbage, is it really that hard to provide such a basic service? only if you are a california government official turns out. otherwise it's not that hard. he proved that. he's an activist and founder of the hashtag persistence. they volunteered in los angeles where they managed to clean up a hundred thousand pounds of trash and just nine hours. thank you for coming on. >> thank you for having me. >> tucker: you first of this and baltimore and baltimore is a famously troubled, but also dirty city. you spent a lot of time cleaning it up and we got quite a reaction from the left.

>> we came in with one tweet come i ask for help. please come to the city of baltimore, let's pick up trash into it as a family. we picked up 12 tons of trash and only 12 hours with hundred 70 volunteers and no good deed goes unpunished unfortunately. the baltimore sun wrote a scathing editorial and i never thought in the a million years i would be criticized for picking up trash! speed when almost unbelievable. they took the bait and admitted that he basically pointed up there in confidence and their lack of caring, their callousness. in los angeles what did you find? >> in los angeles we were welcomed in. this was a homeless encampment, the hundred thousand pounds of trash, they were almost veterans, almost people sleeping next to this and when the doctor is talking about potential type, that means this is a health hazard for american citizens. we were welcomed in and we

picked up 50 tons of trash with only 200 volunteers and nine hours without the help of the city. without the help of the governor and the mayor. we did it as private citizens because we don't need big government. >> tucker: what kind of trash? >> everything. we found needles, mattresses, i think you would make to build a home, furniture and a lot of it was food, some of it was human waste. it was worse in los angeles than it was in baltimore. >> tucker: when the doctor said this is so filthy it poses a human health hazard, that is not an overstatement. >> exactly. if they want to talk about the potential of an epidemic, look no further land los angeles. >> tucker: i'm just confused. you don't live in l.a., you live here in the washington area. you show up there and you're trying to make a point, but you actually did it. what is the city of los angeles do it? >> thank you, great question.

why did an east coast boy have to go to the west coast to show that i care in picking up trash. where the elected california officials? where are all these billions of taxpayer money dollars going to? i want to know. >> tucker: verify this for me if you would, it's not that hard or complicated to pick up trash. >> very true. >> tucker: you lean over and you close your fingers and he put it in a bag. >> and then you remove it and make sure it goes to a dump yard. it's not decoding the human genome? when we were in baltimore, even 81-year-old 4-foot inch sweet louise was helping us. >> tucker: that tells you everything. thank you. >> thank you. >> tucker: elizabeth warren tells us that as president she would rein in the power of big tech, but silicon valley doesn't think she means it, so why should we think she does? first, it's time for

"final exam." two experts from the fox business channel are here to battle it out for a mug. that is next. ♪ (bobby) with your hearing, if you start having a little trouble,

you're concerned that it's going to cost you money. (ben) to this day, i only paid what i had to pay for the device. when i go back, everything is covered. there's so much you're missing by not having hearing aids. (avo) we'll find you a hearing aid that fits your lifestyle and your budget. at one of our 1,500 locations. get special anniversary savings and your chance to win a seven day hawaiian cruise. call 1-800-miracle to schedule your free hearing evaluation.

♪ >> tucker: it is time for "final exam" where two of the

smartest, best informed newest professionals at fox news compete to win fabulous prizes. it's a fox business show down tonight to celebrate the relaunch of the daytime lineup invested in you. fox business correspondent susan li won a t-shirt last week and a handsome one and this week she is hoping to win a mug. the challenger is liz claman, host of the countdown which airs on fox business which i watch which is excellent. we are grateful you are here and also my condolences because susan li is just savage. it's amazing. anyway, good luck to you both. here are the rules. i'm at that the nicest way. you know what the rules. hands-on buzzers nicely questions on the first one gets to answer the question. critically you have to wait until the before you answer, you can answer once technology by saying your name. every correct answer is worth one point. if you get a question wrong you

lose a point. >> was it? >> tucker: the accrual method final exam. >> you are a vicious talker. >> tucker: i don't make the rules. are you ready? question one, this is a multiple-choice way for all the options. in what looks like a bad omen for the future of this presidential campaign, which 2020 candidate had to give a speech in the dark after the venue where he was speaking had a blackout? was it a, peter cohen 16, be, andrew yang, or julian castro? pete buttigieg who spoke in the dark for the democratic -- he was plunged into darkness after the venue lost electricity. >> where was that? nevada? >> tucker: there is a lesson

here. when you constantly invoke god on the campaign trail sometimes he involves. >> you just don't have a good generator. >> tucker: or that! good point. question two, this is not multiple-choice. japan airlines and they want to make your flight more comfortable. when you choose your seat on their website, there is no a map that will help you avoid sitting next to whom or what? >> a baby. >> tucker: she is claiming a baby. >> a vicious crime baby. >> tucker: roll the tape! >> japan airlines has a possible solution, its website lets passengers know where children under two year old will be on a flight before they choose their seats. passengers don't sit next to screaming kids, parents might just end up with a rode to themselves. >> i would rather know if i'm sitting next to a mini horse.

[laughter] >> tucker: and emotional support many worse. this is such a poignant question it made me a little sad reading it. he question three. this is multiple-choice. people in britain are concerned that a once very popular, indeed iconic name is going extinct. last year or 2016 only three babies and all of england and wales received this name. is it arthur, nigel, or reginal reginald? liz? >> i may lose my point here. reginald whereafter mark >> tucker: is the name reginald? that's understandable. >> the name has been on the brink of extension, fewer than three nigel's born. >> really? nigel smith runs a pub and said he wanted something to celebrate the dying breed. he created nigel knight.

there are over 400 nigel's that gathered at the pub to celebrate nigel knight >> tucker: i got it wrong to you and i was doing the quiz in my office because nigel -- i thought most men in great britain were called nigel, but no. >> there are more nigel's than -- more originals than nigel? shocking. >> tucker: question four, which presidential candidate -- >> is this multiple-choice? >> tucker: this a single answer. wait till i finish asking. i will warn you the phrasing of the question and i just read the teleprompter, i'm telling you the phrasing may give it away so pay close attention. which presidential candidate known for over sharing in his personal life just posted a video of himself getting a flu shot? >> that was beto. >> tucker: it has to be beto! is it beto?

♪ [laughter] >> that is great. >> over sharing. >> i'm all for flu shots. >> tucker: he'll be flossing by the end. that's really what narcissism looks like. would you imagine anyone would want to see your flu shot? without even even occur to you? >> tucker: here is our final question. as multiple-choice and at sudden death. you have to wait for all the options. in an interview this week which 2020 candidate revealed that she and not her husband was they want to propose marriage? is it kamala harris, elizabeth warren, amy klobuchar? >> i'm going to blow it. amy klobuchar? >> tucker: did amy lowe bashar asked her husband

>> he walks back and he looks down at me and he says, what did you think? i said, great, will you marry me. he said, yes. that was it. >> that was it. >> tucker: i would have guessed what you guessed, but unfortunately for you that was not correct. susan li remains the champion. amazing. >> that wasn't even matched yet. >> look at that. >> can i get a tucker sippy cup? >> tucker: i think we have one on the website. i will have to check. congratulations to you both on fox business. that looks amazing. i watch it all day long. thank you both. we will be back. next week on thursday, pay attention to the news all week and see if you can beat our

experts at remembering the weird things that happen. it will be right back. ♪

>> tucker: we promise to a story about elizabeth warren and we will bring it to we made a snap decision here. a bizarre moment occurred just a few minutes ago and alexandria telmex b13 town hall and new york consensual and said she is so worried about global warming, we need to eat children. assess for yourself. >> we only have a few months left! i love that you support the greendale, but it's not getting rid of fossil fuels or solve the problem fast enough. a swedish professor assange we can eat dead people, but that's not fast enough. i think your next campaign slogan has to be this, we have to start eating babies! we don't have enough time.

they're so much co2. all of you, you are pollutant. too much co2! we have to start now! you are so great and i'm so happy that you are really supporting the green deal, but it's not enough. even if we would bomber our show we still have too many people! too much pollution! we have to get rid of the babies. that's a big problem. stop having babies is not enough! we need to eat the babies! >> tucker: [laughs] is that real? we don't know. was it a swift d parity? clever trolling of alexandria ocasio-cortez? maybe it was. maybe that is somebody who believes the right erect of left, either way what didn't you hear? that was the most interesting part? when your first response become a watch? no dennis of course not! you the babies?

that's somebody saying what alexandria ocasio-cortez didn't say, pretty revealing. 11 more tomorrow. have a great night and in the meantime will be back, the sworn enemy. sean hannity right now. >> sean: great show as always, welcome to "hannity." big breaking news on multiple fronts. a former top prosecutor from ukraine has now implicated, sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle joe and what is a very serious crime. we have brand-new evidence including a signed under the threat of perjury, the real threat of perjury that he lied. rudy giuliani's timeline coming up tonight and it's very revealing, also this important news and information will prove that the media mob has been and continues to be covering for joe biden and his son. also the fraudulent nancy pelosi shift, impeachment circus is getting o t