out she was going to sue her, he sued her for theft for watching 25 episodes of friends on company time. sean? >> sean: sounds like she's in a movie with joe pesci in real life. let not your heart be troubled. laura is next. what swamp are you in tonight? >> laura: i'm back in washington in the original swamp. you are in the de blasio swamp which is not better. don't get me started on new york. hannity, that is the funniest... de niro and alec baldwin should get together and do crank calls to people for a living. i mean -- >> sean: i've got to say. you know, there was a roast -- i've got to give his daughter. his daughter on twitter, i was fighting alec baldwin asked me to be the mature adult and stopped. i answered. they did a roast, she tore him

up one side down the other. i laughed! she had a great sense of humor. looked like a great kid in spite of him. >> laura: a different scenario here when there's a lawsuit involved oratorical. hannity, great show tonight. >> sean: i agree with you. >> laura: this is the "ingraham angle" from a busy night in washington. bombshell dropping about the identity of the whistle-blower who kicked off the impeachment mania. going to tell us how significant this development is better than rudy giuliani under fire from house democrats and perhaps the secretary of state, he'll respond tonight. house judiciary ranking member doug collins told adc court to ignore the democrats' impeachment probe and he's going to tell us why. why does elizabeth warren keep lying about her past? new developments there and how we car breaks it all down. but first, hype and hyperbole.

that's the purpose of tonight's angle. how many times have democrats declared president trump is on the ropes? seems like every other day self-righteous anchors with very serious faces tell the fictitious white house and crisis story. make news runs the gamut from the trivial -- the president is angry and isolated, the staff is miserable, to be more serious. >> you cannot fire comey for the wrong reasons. you cannot fire him for investigations. >> this is a crisis for the country. >> laura: blah, blah, blah, it's always the beginning of the end. remember dire predictions of don jr.'s meeting and the russian lawyer? >> he should be concerned even more so than for himself. if donald jr. has some legal exposure here. >> i think they are shocked. the news is frightening and people might go to jail. >> you are exactly right. >> laura: the noose is

tightening! the frenzy surrounding the hinging on the word of his former attorney, michael cohen. >> if this michael cohen when evidence stands up, if michael cohen does stand up to this, this is a potentially huge, potentially something that could prove the president colluded, and that is an impeachable offense. >> laura: girl, max headroom! who could forget the goofballs predicting a story peddled by a porn star could topple trump? >> if it seems to be credible, that could bring down this presidency. >> >> laura: oh, donnie. throughout all of it, the media's massive heart pounding buildup of the mueller probe. >> we are seeing the collusion piece of this piece by piece starting to be built out. >> the president looks like somebody who is increasingly desperate. >> laura: the crisis cliches

never stopped. >> it feels like we are finally at a tipping point. the walls are closing in on president trump. >> laura: closing in! but always wrong, never in doubt. and never a correction or a mea culpa. their goal from day one is to drive trump out of office, the facts be damned. the last 48 hours, the get trump gang did their hype and have a really all over again. first is the news of the state department's ig's urgent meeting with lawmakers. while the coyote is finally going to catch the lawmaker. that means something is in those documents that's important that the people doing this impeachment increase see immediately. >> laura: immediately! this is really important. or not so much. >> i don't really know the relevance of it. at certain part it's hard to

follow. >> there's nothing in here i think directly relevant to the trump's impeachable contact. >> laura: foiled again! draft. at first you don't succeed, hype, hype again. democrats were salivating on air and off about today's testimony by kurt vulgar. they thought his resignation, which was forced, as somehow would be a blockbuster. instead, it was another died. >> had said nothing that coincides with what the democrats are saying, with their whole impeachment narrative. unbelievably knowledgeable about what was going on in ukraine. >> laura: answer mr. impeachment adam schiff, he seemed today oddly quiet. >> would you mind telling us about this? >> laura: he has comments

about comments, you can stop him from talking! suddenly today, cat had its tongue. this would be so funny if it weren't so serious. democrats doing equivalent day after day yelling fire in a crowded theater. and that theater is america. this is doing enormous damage to the country. and as for the press, they lost their credibility a long time ago. not sure they can go any lower, but they are trying. all the president needs to do now is smile and keep delivering results and watch the hype and hyperbole machine self combust. and that's the angle. as the democrats rush to the credit card democracy, g.o.p. leaders are fighting back. kevin mccarthy sent house speaker nancy pelosi a letter demanding she and make impeachment inquiries until "equitable rules and procedures are put in place." our next guest also filed an amicus brief in federal courts

today contesting the legality of the entire incongruity. congressman doug collins arguing the house must vote before the process begins, which did not happen here. can star rated that issue last night. joining me now, congressman doug collins, ranking member of the house judiciary committee. congressman, how can the democrats run in in a credible investigation without the publicans involved? >> they can't, laura. i've been nine months with this, i been watching jerry nadler and his happy bad majority run roughshod over rules, they want one thing at the end of the day, they want to do it since 2016. that's why -- at the end of the day, people understand fairness. people may disagree with the president, may not like president, but when you have the speaker of the house who refuses to bring an inquiry to the floor, why does that matter? why does that

if they made her democrats vote for the inquiry and they started a new inquiry, we in the minority have a right. my self would have subpoena power in the judiciary committee just like chairman nadler would. the chairman could weigh in to say that i should be recused. isn't that a unique concept? in america, we believe that people have due process rights. but this speaker is running roughshod over the house and it's got to stop. this is a travesty and it's affecting the institution of the house. >> laura: it's affecting how people laid out in the angle, congressman, how people view our democratic republic, people view the press, how people view the entire concept of fairness. the president being hamstrung in his ability to conduct foreign policy. i'm sorry, but that china, north korea, the way they look at this -- they don't care one whit about how this affects our economy or anything else. it's about tearing down this president, ripping them out of office by any means necessary. i've got to ask you.

nancy pelosi gave an interview on abc where i think she revealed unwittingly what's really going on. watch. >> the real thing is donald trump would donald trump do irreparable damage in the united states. we have some serious repair and healing for what he's done so far. i'm not sure two terms, it might be irreparable. >> that's it. >> laura: we can't risk the people voting for peace and prosperity, it's amazing to me. >> nancy pelosi has little faith in the american people. if she believes the democratic party candidates for president were actually on the right track, actually sharing the right message, why is she sells comfortable so skeptical of the american people voting for the right ide? she knows donald trump is connecting with the american people, she did it in 2016, we are going to see it again next year, and what she's willing to

do is to overturn the next election because she is scared. this is her second time around as speaker. what did we get the first time? we got obamacare, got all kinds of things we are now having to dig out of. >> laura: shovel ready. it's all shovel ready. >> shovel ready. what shovel ready is what she's spreading to the american people what they are doing with this impeachment inquiry. that's shovel ready because it's not anything close -- she's lying to the american people, that's why the amicus brief was filed. if she wanted this information, she knew she had to. >> laura: congressman, fox news just confirmed the president will send pelosi a letter tomorrow that the white house is going to ignore democrat demands until the house formally approved impeachment proceedings. he's daring her to hold impeachment vote. good move? >> i think what you are going to have to have -- do you know who is scared right now? about 30-40 40 democrats in the seats trump won.

you recognize your putting in jeopardy of the house majority that you won last year on a platform of you are going to do something of the american people. you're going to do infrastructure, prescription drug crisis. you've done none of that except attacked the president. this is the problem that we are happening right now. if you want to do it properly, by the book, do that. but speaker pelosi, chairman nadler, chairman schiff, he can't spell truth much less tell it. this is the problem we are seeing right now, they are destroying the institution of the house and everybody, republicans, democrats, independence ought to be aggrieved by that. >> laura: i've got to tell you, you said you will be fair and work with republicans, you showed your true colors here. congressman, thank you very much. great to have you on tonight. there is a bombshell new development about the political bias of the whistle-blower at the center of impeachment mania. a report claiming the anonymous person is reportedly a

registered democrat. is that a big deal? what does that say about the credibility of the complaint? a lot more about this challenge to the house not having an actual impeachment vote, a formal vote. here is john eastman, constitutional scholar, law professor at chapman university, trump 2020 anniversary 2020 advisory member. is that enough to eat suggest that ukraine-gate is about political retribution, the whistle-blower is a democrat? >> given the number of democrats that actually work for the federal government, probably not. what we know is he's a spy at the cia, he was at the white house for a while, he went back to cia headquarters, and this information that he complained on was leaked to him from within the white house. so that's troubling enough, whether it's because he's a democrat or just like somebody else in the deep state a partisan against this president no matter what his political affiliation is.

>> laura: there are some folks telling me that the fact that as a registered democrat, it's the beginning. that it's one little tidbit that came out. i think that's just the tip of the iceberg. that's not the biggest deal, but i want to move on with what else is going on with the white house deciding to go totally on the offensive and republicans on capitol hill, that's the position they should always be in. this whole defensive -- forget that. they should be filing lawsuit after lawsuit. you do that in your practice, you are always on the move, and a big win for trump in california, this week for max trump in california talk about this new posture the republicans are taking. >> to professor eastman's point, there are many republicans who hate the president as well. the president has to realize with this being the second attempt to overthrow him that if

he survives this, there is going to be a third and fourth. this is a permanent war splitting the democrats need to be on that the democrats have long abandoned. to make sure that all americans stand behind due process. they don't care about that. they are just desperate. shredding the democracy, we are not going to get that back. we've got to fight hard to put them to the test. >> laura: john, what with the court do -- i mean, they don't like to get involved in political questionings if they don't have to. this isn't supposed to be political, though. this is supposed to be based on impeachment, it's supposed to be high crimes and misdemeanors. in the amicus brief, what does that really amounts to? >> the problem is that the house has the sole power of impeachment and the senate has the sole power to try impeachment. in the context of the senate trying impeachment, the supreme court has already held years ago that what their procedures are are entirely up to them.

i suspect that the court would do the same thing with the house of representatives. that means it's not unfair and what's going on here is grossly unfair. i mean, the notions that republicans can even ask questions, they don't have the same subpoena power to bring witnesses on the other side to challenge the fake narrative -- >> laura: it's ludicrous! >> it's insane, what's more significant here is the latest of the man all the president's foreign phone calls with other heads of states, which forward head of state is actually going to negotiate with our president on the phone given this circus atmosphere that's in washington, d.c.? they would be insane to do that! that means what the democrats are doing is usurping the cause additional role of the president from conducting foreign affairs, and it is starting and damaging us nationally, internationally and threatening our very standing on the world stage. for petty, cheap political

points. to be when i do not think the founders ever dissipated things -- >> laura: in never seems like they could have anticipated this happening to our republic. no due process. no understanding of fairness. this is what nancy and adam want to shop through? they think this is going to come down as, okay, thank you? >> exactly, laura. we have a system of checks and balances and i wouldn't think we'd come to this situation where leaders of the opposing party would tear up the constitution, tried to undermanned undermined the office of the presidency totally. make sure the american voters do not trust our politicians again and they don't vote because they don't trust the process by to make this as an impeachment against the american people and their vote, lara. if this is allowed to proceed on this track, it's going to permanently damage our country and we cannot let that happen for the future of the country.

>> laura: thank you so much, both of you. before we go, last night i made a comment about the whistle-blower, the lawyer, saying he previously resented chuck schumer and hillary clinton. that was incorrect. i was mistaking mark for another attorney represented in the level it was a different lawyer. i apologize for that mixed up. up next, rudy g, giuliani, says secretary of state mike pompeo promised to investigate the biden families ukraine connection. sources say that's not true. what is the truth? giuliani is here to clear it up in moments.

>> laura: we have a fox news alert. fox has obtained a copy of notes that rudy giuliani, trump's personal attorney, took while interviewing shokin in february. he says his vacation stopped fear of the united states. shokin was investigate in burisma where biden's son hunter was serving on the board. giuliani was warned ukrainian claims regarding the bidens were not credible. so what's the truth? joining me now is rudy giuliani himself.

so, rudy, is shokin a credible source? >> well, shokin -- we cannot determine shokin as a credible source because nobody investigated it. if i had been told that shokin is not a credible source, i would've immediately said to do an investigation. and to determine that. i would've been curious as to how they came to that conclusion if they didn't do an investigation because i would've then suspected that the -- uh, obama holdover is trying to protect people in the state department were lying to them. the only way you can determine shokin is telling the truth or not is to question him and determine if he has cooperation or doesn't he, and he happens to have corroboration. i am curious if it wasn't the state department who conducted that investigation. let me clear up the conversation with pompeo. i turned over that outline you see with secretary pompeo, i had

hand-delivered with him, had a conversation with him thereafter, and he told me he was going to turn it over not to investigate biden, which is what i think is maybe the problem, but that's the way the press wants to drive it. but he told me he was going to turn it over for internal investigation because within his purview, the real questions were how improper were the actions of the ambassador and several other people that are named there in the state department that appeared to have been involved in collecting the dirty information on the trump campaign, which, in fact, there is a finding of the ukrainian court that there was information! >> laura: rudy, i've got to tell you that i think americans in general can't follow most of this. >> of course they can't. >> laura: i don't follow >> laura: i can follow this because i live, breathe, eat this. one guy says one guy resigned and meanwhile they are trying to pay their bills at the end of the month and hoping that stock

market dozen crass it doesn't crash. they can see there seems to be some confusion within the administration. pompeo seems like he's saying that he's saying he didn't promised to look into the bidens. he felt the need through sources to say, we did and promise that. you seem to indicate that the other night with us. >> because he was given the mischaracterization of what i said. i never said to investigate biden. he didn't say that. what he said was he was going to give into his investigators to conduct an internal investigation. and i was happy about that because i thought if they did an internal investigation, it would lead to everything else. i see no indication they did an internal investigation, but then again they may have. if volker said my sources were incredible, wrong, i would mutely say did you do in the investigation, because i would've really wanted them to.

people have to be careful about the words. i learned as a prosecutor, i was taught this, follow the money. all the money is going to the bidens. that's where the millions of dollars are going. they are crooked. >> laura: everyone is calling that a conspiracy in the media. every time. >> it is a conspiracy! >> laura: talking about trump special envoy. unproven transparency -- this has been repeated all day long and on every network. rudy giuliani making unsubstantiated claims about the bidens. you yourself say it wasn't investigated. yet the appearance of impropriety, there is no doubt there is an appearance of impropriety. at the very least, joe biden should've never been doing ukraine policy when his son was on the board, never should've been happening period, end of story. >> the son should not of been paid five $28 million when he had just come out of a drug

problem. >> laura: that is burisma's thing, but the vice president should not have been engaging in this period. that should've never happen, and he member of the media saying that school need to understand that. people understand that off the bat. i want to release a text message today, to gordon's unlink in the u.s. ambassador to the e.u. this is september 9th. he said, as i said to the phone, i think it's crazy to withhold security assistance to help with a political campaign, right? than some lynn says, bill, i think you are incorrect about the president trump's trying to validate whether ukraine is going to adopt transparency and reform. i suggest we stop the back and text. the ambassador to the e.u. basically telling taylor knock

it off, that's not what the president intended, making it clear that transcript, the president's transcript was about corruption in the ukraine with a reference to, we'll look into this because it's part of the corruption. >> absolutely right. that's exactly what it was abou about. the democrats have pushed the narrative with the press willing to print anything they say, the president was trying to hurt a political opponent when, in fact, from long before biden was even in the race, the president's concern was with how the ukrainians participated in collusion and how the vice president of the united states had seriously damage the integrity of our country by having a son with billions and billions of dollars while he was doling out billions of dollars which on the face of it is entirely correct. >> laura: rudy, mike mcfall is on and that's nbc tonight. he said this.

watch. >> i think ambassador is volker signed up on this, the middle of all that, president trump with his other special envoy rudy giuliani decide the only thing they care about with ukraine is, one, investigating hunter biden and the corruption, quote unquote, of the vice president, and he wants to get putting off the hook and blame ukrainians for the interference in 2016. >> laura: rudy, former ambassador with russia says you are trying to get putin off the hook? >> when was the ambassador? >> laura: obama? >> was he ambassador when he said after the election he'll go easy with vladimir? did that phone interview go anywhere after that? >> laura: rudy, thanks for seeing us tonight. >> they are such ponies, but they've got the press in their pocket. >> laura: thanks so much. coming up, why is john brennan

sweating bullets about answering u.s. attorney john durham's questions, and why has the media allowed to keep pushing again the debunked russia hoax? former cia analyst fred sliced is here on why brennan is running scared.

this time of year, what do you give? when it's your extra concert, game or special event tickets to vet tix, you're giving our nation's service members and veterans an amazing experience they'll cherish forever. this holiday season, don't just give... vet tix. give something to those who gave. for more information on how you can make a difference right now, go to vettix.org. >> laura: msnbc trotted out john brennan yesterday who not only propped up the phony

russian narrative but also suggested it would happen again. >> it's not that trump cares about russian interference. as he sees his political fortunes dwindling he's helping his pal vladimir is going to come there once again and help them get elected in 2020 if he's going to be in office by then. >> laura: for that comment, he should never work again! that is just -- "his pal vladimir"... the intel they've wigged? what would cause a once venerated spy chief to level a bogus claim again? welcome a fear? >> i'm supposedly going to be interviewed by mr. durum as part of this investigation. i remember william barr when he was testifying in front of congress, he said he didn't understand the predication that was launched into russian 2016 interference but i do not understand the predication of this world wide effort to uncover dirt, either real or imagined, that would discredit that investigation in 2016 and into russian interference.

>> laura: was he really had of the cia? that is terrifying that someone is very worried. joining me now, the former cia analyst, former nsc official -- fred, brennan says he does everything by the book. why does he seem on the edge about durham's interview? >> this is a priority for the president that what happens in 2016 doesn't happen again. intelligence was weaponized. this is a huge part of our government to collect foreign intelligence to defend our national security. it was used to influence a presidential election and we know brennan was in the middle of all of this. the ambassador to united nation asked for the names of hundreds of trump officials -- >> samantha power. >> to bd mass from an essay reports. was >> laura: you would not have done what samantha power had asked. >> i can to it.

>> laura: all these people were asking for unmasking like popcorn at that the reader. >> the steele dossier was used in pfizer we know it was leaked against general flynn and senator sessions. either to democratic candidates. >> laura: i think he has a duty to look into this. a duty to have someone look into this. >> you know, the intelligence committee is on it. they haven't done anything to address it, they admit that it happened and put in place rules to make sure it never happens again. that wouldn't be too difficult. >> laura: do you think schiff should recuse himself from this entire affair, given his ties to the ukrainian armed merchants,

he had a vested interest in keeping the big war machine going and hilary would've been a much better pig for him. >> i think so. i think adam schiff has crossed all kinds of problems for this impeachment and ukraine story. you saw the democrats scrambling today because the american people were not told the truth about this. the whistle-blower first came to the intelligence committee, didn't follow procedures. schiff learned about this, did not tell his republican members. >> laura: didn't he lie and say there was no contact and clearly there was contact and he knew about it? >> he said mid-september, we have not spoken directly to the whistle-blower -- who was weak? was a using the royal we have for himself? >> laura: he was, "well, i wasn't completely candid" -- i'm paraphrasing. >> using this information to attack the president throughout the month of august and it looks like he didn't tell the republicans members, but he did tell speaker pelosi because he

said on the "60 minutes" at the end of septembers, he had the transcript before it was released. >> laura: as a former intel official yourself, you've seen the damage done to these institutions because of his 2016 debacle. you've got brennan out there saying, because his pal vladimir, he doesn't want him blamed, but he can help him out again the next election. former cia chief! knowing that this never happened, by the way. >> i'm a big admirer of leon panetta. he's a democrat, i don't agree with him. but he was class, respect the office of the presidency. he is an ambassador of the field. >> laura: he's been hitting trump lately, i'm not wild about him. >> but brennan's been disgraced with his personal attacks. seeing him a minute ago, he's always angry. i've talked to intelligence officials who don't like the president and they are very upset with brennan. >> laura: great to see you as always and we've shown you the liberal media miss information

campaign regarding impeachment, and now we are going to backcheck their lives. joining me now is tammy bruce, president of the independent women's forum and the fox news contributor. tammy, who better to do it then you? i want to start tonight with cn cnn, our backcheck. watch how opinions are simply stated as facts. >> i'm a former investigative reporter. i still take those skills with me to the hill every single day. in the president's own words, asking a foreign entity to do a favor for him in exchange for delivering defense, that was a line that just went way too far. >> i'm holding the transcript for the notes or the reconstructed transcript of the call in my hand, and you can see why you hear president from asked the leader of ukraine to dig up dirt on joe biden and his son. >> laura: when did the president say it, dig up dirt on joe biden and his son? when did he say that?

>> well, schiff said that, didn't he? that's what they've tried to do. the transcript wasn't at all what they thought it would be. it's because they didn't expect him to release the transcript. this was their playbook from the start. he was not going to release the transcript and they would create it -- -- it's fanfiction, lara. it's fanfiction, and they cannot stop themselves because they cannot adapt to reality, so you hear that it's horrible enough that schiff read that into the record of the house. >> laura: that's exploitive. >> let's go on this excellent note >> laura: this dovetails into what you just said. nancy pelosi was on abc news lying about adam schiff's version, fake version, false version -- >> that's right. >> laura: of trump's phone call. >> i want the american people know what that phone call was about. i want them to hear it.

but using the president's own words. >> it was in the prison's own words, in the interpretation of the words. he could've made this up. >> he didn't make it up. >> hasn't this past the point of no return? >> laura: 's why didn't stephanopoulos stop it right there and say, he's sad, nancy,s a parody! >> she had a very strange use on her face. for him, he was on the clinton team. he couldn't carry the ball home, couldn't do it. listening to schiff is how you are going to be hearing it and that's where it gets to be, old, she was challenged. no, she wasn't. when it came right down to it she effectively lied about saying, word is words. no, it wasn't. >> laura: but they need that

narrative to sell impeachment, to get the ball is more supportive of impeachment. that's why they have to keep repeating it over and over again. finally, we've got "huffington post" reporter sam stein running some interference today for adam schiff. >> >> obviously we now know that there was a approached his staff but there is not 100% certainty that there was who approach the staff is not the same one behind the complaint. >> laura: he wasn't forthcoming, tammy. there never is a but when they're republicans are screwing up. >> that segment, i have to hand it to him. i'm sure he doesn't play poker. he looked very uncomfortable ensuring that lying. it is so absurd. we weren't sure who it was. maybe it was casper the friendly ghost. you really don't know -- who knows who it was quick to make a could've been anyone, maybe it was who delivers the bagels. it's the absurdity and what it tells you, laura, they know what they are doing is wrong, they know -- they might as well --

there might as well be a channel of democrat community fans, whae doing it, they know it's not correct and they continue on anyway. they've ruined it, and industry, the latest gallup poll, by the way, the trust in media? people who have a great rest of trust of people in the media, 13%. >> laura: i'd like to talk to those 15% in just a few minutes. thank you, tammy. why does the new democratic front runner keep lying about her past. first it was her native american ancestry, and now warren is lying about something entirely new. we will reveal it with how we car hallie car next.

>> we have a president who was a pathological liar. >> everybody knows that donald trump is, including his supporters. >> we choose truth overlies. >> we will meet lies and hate with the truth. >> laura: now trump doesn't have to lie about senator warren's family. she's been doing that on our own. who can forget about her repeated lies about being a native american. harvard law school even touted her as their first women of color. nice. remember this touching story?

>> i still have a picture on my mantle, a picture of my grandfather. my aunt bea has walked by that picture at least a thousand times. remarked that her father, my papaw, had high cheekbones like all of the indians do. being native american has been part of my story, i guess, since the day i was born. >> laura: speaking of fiction, as we all know, warren's dna tests showed she was less than one-tenth of 1% native american. that's not all. in the light has emerged. this has become a 2020 campaign trail favorite. >> i finish my degree and i became a special needs teacher. i would probably still be doing it today. when we got to the end of the first year, i was visibly pregnant. and principal did what principals did in those days. they wish you luck, showed you the door, hired someone else for

the job. >> laura: interns out in 2007, warren was spending a different yarn. >> i work with children's with disabilities. i didn't have the education courses, so i was on an emergency certificate. i went back to graduate school and i thought, this isn't going to work out for me. i was pregnant with my first baby, so i had a baby. >> laura: it's an evolving narrative. what will she think of next. joining me now, how we car, radio how we maybe she's just a little fuzzy on the memory, or is this developing to help her in the campaign. >> the right word is evolving. it's almost biden-esque how she picks up things she likes and puts it in her own biography.

the most appalling case was with her grandparents and said that her parents back in the depression era oklahoma back in the 1930s had to elope because her paternal grandparents were so opposed to her father marrying her mother who was supposedly a native american. so they had to elope, that was her word. they had to elope. she told the story repeatedly. breitbart went back to her senate campaign and checked out the newspaper accounts back in her little hometown of oklahoma, rural oklahoma. it turns out her parents, they just decided on a saturday afternoon -- they drove to the next town -- they weren't married by a justice of the peace or what you usually have when they elope but they were married by a prominent methodist clergymen and they drive back to the town and have a big wedding reception -- >> laura: a celebration!

>> already planned. and they got covered on next week's newspaper. there was no elopement. it was just all nonsense that she made up. she sat down next sat on the campaign trail, i practiced law for about 45 minutes. turns out our memorial day for a minimum coverage she listed 66 cases she handled and a lot of them were bankruptcies. do you know what she and bernie say about whatever donald trump had a brush with bankruptcy -- oh, it's crony capitalism! >> laura: she was presenting the banks. representing the banks. you know, she's inflating, conflating, and it's all part of the victim-ology narrative. howie, you are looking into pretty expensive looks into her lies and you came across a thing that didn't seem right in her

cookbook. it's called powwow child. how >> this was by her cousin. she was starting small with the graft. you don't start out a big ponzi scheme, you start out with something small, a small embezzlement. she says she needs to come up with a recipe for this powwow chow cookbook, this indian cookbook, so she comes down with what she claims is a family recipe that comes down from the trail of tears. from the first it came back, she had lifted it, plagiarized it from a guy named pierre frame, who was a "new york times"'s famed shaft. >> laura: well known native american.

>> one of the famous recipes, a favorite of the duke and duchess of windsor. >> laura: very old-school indian. that's just crazy. howie, thank you very much. keep on! don't let up. robert de niro totally unhinged, and you loss it makes claims a new lawsuit makes claims.

>> a con, a belief artist, a mutt who doesn't know what he's talking about, talks and wants to punch people in the face? i'd like to punch him in the face. baby in chief has -- [bleep] in chief i call him. >> i remember the tonys where he came up and cursed, [bleep] on the [bleep] -- this guy is like a gangster. >> laura: this is robert de niro in one of his profanity laced rants, and on fox news. robert de niro was hit with a $120 million harassment lawsuit.

i will be the first to tell you that anyone can sue. in this case, the nero's assistant has evidence in the form of at least an angry voice mail. >> you [bleep] don't answer my calls! how dare you? you are against me! you [bleep], you are history. i didn't get a single thing i need, right now here in california in less than 24 hours quick mike you've got to be [bleep] kidding me, you spoiled brat! >> laura: good acting! except, it's not. our question tonight, has a trump broken the entertainment industry. the nero lives in york, he's not in hollywood, but you've got my point. here to answer that question, actor robert dobbie. people seem they are really unhinged whether they are chelsea handler said she needed therapy last may. doesn't like to be criticized, all these people go nuts.

>> thank you for having me, laura. it's interesting. i think the vitriol that de niro is feeling donald trump must come from some may be some real estate deal in new york years ago, because it seems kind of unjustified in a certain way. i mean, since he became president, trump has been under attack, as we all know, with this collusion, and it's misplaced anger. when he says something like that to the rest of the nation, what he said on cnn at them, you've got 60 million plus people that -- now, the nero is a great actor, great artist, revered around the world, and for him to say the president is acting like a gangster when if you listen to some of the junk audio recordings, it sounds a little bit like that. >> laura: do you know what i have a problem with, robert? they have every right to speak out. they have every right to say we don't care what you say.

everyone has every right to say what they want. that's free speech. what i want to understand when they are criticized, you can't criticize me! i'm a professional athlete! i'm an actor! like, hey, you want to step in the arena of politics, step in. let's do it. why don't you come on the show and try that nonsense with someone like me and we'll have a real conversation. but you hide behind these pup interviews behind people were people suck up to you 24/7, thet his feet at that interview. >> they give him feed lines and the courage to say that kind of stuff instead a confrontation. i saw an interview with dinero, he was on stage and people went to cheering or applying applauding. he said, come on, let's applaud this. it was bashing trump, it was like it was required to stand up

and applaud in trump bashing. there's a bubble in hollywood, a bubble in new york and the west coast, that donald trump has been inside both bubbles and he's bursting it from inside. with that, they are sucking oxygen. they are panicking because they cannot catch a breath. something is going on. christie ally the other day just mention something and i think a lot of people in hollywood has been frustrated with this. how many years are we going to have with this collusion? now talking about schiff making stuff up? why isn't de niro -- >> laura: god bless them. all it is is anti-trump all the time pure love having you on. when we come back, the last bit bite. kamala harris, his or her last bite? maybe

>> laura: it's time for the last bite. even the fans who showed up for kamala harris' rally don't seem all that enthused about her

candidacy. >> questions have been coming up about electability. just on our campaign. is america ready for that? >> no. >> yes, they are. >> laura: don't ask a question you don't know the answer for prethat's all the time we have tonight. shannon bream and the "fox news @ night" team takes it from here. have a great show. >> sean: thank you, laura. we begin with a fox news alert. >> shannon: now daring house speaker, top democrat nancy pelosi to bring a full impeachment inquiry both to the house floor. the president's critics say his public call for china to investigate senator biden's business plus former special all