remember i am waters and this is my world. ♪ >> hello and welcome to justice, thank you so much for being with us tonight. and thank you again for keeping this alive and making justice number one again all this we can. impeachment, impossible. is there a real crime here? or has the trump campaign left go all in on a hoax again. since when can one president speak on the phone to another leader. tonight we have a stellar lineup of guest to answer those questions and dig into all the impeachment madness. governor microscopy is your life so is dan bomb dino, candidate

for congress, darrell and charlie. but i have 70 questions were where we are in this mess. i want to get him right away, house minority leader, kevin mccarthy, good evening congress mccarthy. >> good evening. >> is anything that the president said in the conversation that he had, criminal or impeachable? >> not at all, nothing that he said is impeachable, you can even hear the democrats admit to that. if the speaker, nancy pelosi would've waited 48 hours until she had the transcript we would never be tearing this country apart. the democrats are on a discredit democracy. they are creating a system that is raked. >> they been trying to do that for a while.

you decide on letter to speaker pelosi saying suspend the so-called formal impeachment inquiry, why did you do that. >> i said you have to stop it, because every time in the past will be looked after nixon, clinton and the judges, we set up process, a fair process because that's what we believe in the country, the rule of law. i had ten questions for her, exactly what we did when we dealt with clinton and nixon. you know what she said, she said no. anytime we move forward with impeachment we had about all the congress, why, because america lends her voice to 435 members, they should have a say in the process to start. >> when you say due process, you are essentially saying if there was an official impeachment inquiry voted by 218 members of the house then there would be due process. you would be able to subpoena witnesses. you could cross-examine.

if it becomes a real official due process hearing. but this is not. the interesting part under part of this is that intel which is closed-door. my correct about that? >> you are correct, and the house roses was to be judiciary. she pulled it out and put it with adam schiff who is a common denominator of all the lies. that is why you did not get the transcript in the hearing that took place, if you did you would've heard there's no quid pro quo. the other thing when you look at this, why can't the president have subpoena power like the minority had when bill clinton was going forward. >> why can't the president have fairness. the president has already been fair, he gave them the transcript, they did not have subpoenas, he said take it look at it.

then we go to the 218 books. pelosi refuses to call for a vote. why do you think that is? >> she has 31 members were democrats and she will say republicans are worried. i tried to bring it to the floor twice to have a boat if that's what she wanted and she cable level every time because is trying to protect her members. but she has a system that is unfair. we have president trump who is the most transparent president we've ever had. he delivered a phone call, transcript, no one habit has evr asked about before. just to make sure it's clear. >> when you talk about the phone call, are they now saying we have a right to ask every phone call of every conversation of the president of the united states. if the president is called on china into hunter biting the

billion in half dollars, they are not stupid is the house going to come in and claim on any transcript which is something? >> i don't think any phone call should be public. every center president, were weakening our national security. no world leader will be honest with whoever since in the oval office and the fear that whatever they say will come forward. but this president had to do this, they said because of the quid pro quo he would bring different items up and lo and behold we find out, none of that happened. he had to go this far because they want discredit democracy. there upset about the 2016 election will stop at nothing to get the president impeached. >> i want to read this, it's a transcript of a phone call where the president wilensky said, i

want to thank you for your support, were ready to cooperate and buy more javelins for defense purposes. and president trump said, i would like you to do what's in favor because our country has been through a lot in ukraine is about and we want to find out what happened with the whole situation with ukraine and crowd strength. do we not have a transcript of that? let's go back to the congressman. congressman is there anything about the transcript that i just read that in any way suggest the quid pro quo? >> not at all. he never said i'll do that if you do this. what the president was talking about this is an open investigation to get to the bottom of what happened with the russian collision. this is an open investigation that the attorney general has had with already looking into the president has talked about before, this is exactly what we do with countries all around the world to work on investigations

and to get to the bottom of problems. nothing illegal about what happened. >> there is nothing in the conversation that suggests that military aid to the ukraine is contingent on abiding investigation correct? >> also the hearing that we had this week with volker and others, there was no quid pro quo. you realize president trump provided ukraine more than $1 billion were president obama did not. president trump also gave them the instrument to stop the tanks were president obama would not. this is so crazy. >> i want to ask a few more questions, we hear the whistleblower is a member of the cia, is it normal for them to be working in the white house?

>> yes, they will have different people attached to the white house at times. >> should they be involved in domestic investigations at all if you're a member of the cia? they should not deal with these domestic issues. >> remember who the so-called whistleblower is. every time a whistleblower comes before congress and they do all the time, do they have firsthand knowledge and what their motive. this falls on both because it's hearsay. >> i'm going to get into that, what we have is very unusual scenarios in the president who is now in addition to not having members of congress having to say where they stand, they are trying to money him up before the next election to do what they been trying to do since he was elected. not since he walked in the oval but since he was elected. i'll give you the last word since i cut you off. >> you are 100% correct. nadler ran to the chairman of the judiciary committee for all the democrats and how he got the vote he promised to be the very

best for impeachment. this is after 2016 after he got elected. this is on the day he was sworn into office. this is exactly what they want. >> outrageous. thank you so much for being with us tonight. joining me now with more reaction to this ridiculous impeachment circus, the podcast of fox news contributor. i want to talk about adam schiff in the way that here's a guy, this guy lies about russian collision and he says he knows more than mueller as any wants every camera to say he knows there's russian collision. that was a lie. then we find out that the whistleblower went to contact his office, and then i will call for some sound, as to what his answer is when he is asked whether or not he or anyone are going to talk to the

whistleblower. >> we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower and we would like to. >> we know that is a flat out lie. because on august the 12th, they have contact with the whistleblower. then what happens, he keeps quiet and adam schiff to build the case. but he continues to build the narrative in the narrative is this, for one month, he does not let anyone know, just like diane feinstein and kristi ford, they want to create a narrative, august 23 he tweets out, mr. trump tried to get dirt on a political opponent and then again on august 28, he ends up tweeting out, he says the president is withholding vital aid to the ukraine. so what he is doing is trying to whet the appetite of the

american people for in impeachment while the washington post comes out and says this guy got for pinocchio's. he is a liar. you take it from there. >> that was a great role and i like your adam schiff, if this does not work out comedy might. the media folks are going to get taken by adam schiff toques. what you discussed with the collision, he also said he had direct evidence of collusion. this when he said clear as day, it's unequivocal noncategorical statement. i had no contact with the whistleblower. that was just not true. it was not a make statement, understatement, he lied. one thing with adam schiff, not only is he a liar he is an awful

liar. if you're going to lie about not contacting the whistleblower, then do not tweet out tidbits of what the whistleblower was going to say beforehand that people can go back and look at. >> catherine said something on the network that run my belt. i had this exact same feeling. she said two weeks ago, she said this has a feeling of a rollout. in other words, some kind of a preplanned hit that this was not a guy in a white house that heard something so disturbing, nonsense. this was a preplanned hit from the start. she did not say that, i am telling you that. this had all the fingerprint. >> i just told you it was. he lied, he is a liar. you are delusional and are dangerous. in your head of the intelligence committee. you know what, this guy should read news himself because of the witness, his whole committee as

a witness. and when he read the transcript aspect. >> i disagree, i love this guy, keep this guy the head of the judiciary and everything that he does is a hoax, he has 0 credibility. let democrats keep adam schiff, nancy pelosi keep him, terms approval is up, his approval rating is up, he raised $125 million in the last three months. -- >> let's keep him on, nancy pelosi got rid of napa because he was a jerk and call cory a jerk in his first impeachment. >> so now they put in intel, you

have shifty shift he wrote the narrative who has this whole thing pointed and then when he read the transcript of what the president has released on his own because he is not worried about anything that was said the guy lies, you can call it a purity, joking around, you don't joke around to impeach the president. he lied about what the president hoping he was placing a seed of the narrative. >> he thought he would not get caught then he brings poker and buffy brings up somebody from the present to testify for the president. >> he is incompetent. >> bottom line, the american

people are fed up with this nonsense, it's about time congress start working for us. >> good last ten seconds, damn right. thank you. joining me now former arkansas governor of fox news contributor, mike huckabee. we have barack obama during his ministration when he was trying to make sure the donald trump would not get elected, i never saw the president work so hard at trying to not get this guy elected. he goes out and he says to ukraine, give me all the dirt you have on paul manafort. so he can use in the campaign against donald trump. would you say that the double theater? >> everything about the situation has been a double standard. from the moment donald trump was elected that was make so many americans livid, they're not

stupid they see what this is about, overturning the election of 2016. the whole impeachment talk did not to start with ukraine. it started with the inauguration and some people were talking about impeaching him before he took the oath of office. if you go back and look at the clips from the media and as well as from democrats, they have been talking about impeachment and the only thing that has changed is not because of russia, obstruction or racism. now it's the ukraine. when this goes south there be another funny reason to come up with. >> the crazy part you had a special counsel, this guy mueller hood did not know what gps is, i don't know why they mention his name. and you have hillary clinton won laundering money so foreign agent to get information from the russian government to use in a political campaign to spy on american citizens. that is another example of the double standard.

and they want to take down donald trump who is legitimately because he said it from the get go, i want to find out where this all started. for the counterintelligence investigation started. we know a lot of it started in the ukraine. what makes anybody think he doesn't have a right to make a phone call and ask for information or on joe biden and his son. >> i think he does have the right to do that. it's exactly what he has done. i don't understand why people think it's perfectly okay for us to go after president trump and anything he has connected to ukraine and i'm not sure were spoke ask any christian fathers connection, obama's, powers connection,, if a deed to a real investigation, let's find out. what role did biden play, how

did his son get that job. if there is nothing there then they have nothing to worry about. but if there's something there, no wonder there's so frantic trying to make sure that nobody pulled the covers back on the whole ukrainian thing for the democrats. >> you know what is interesting, the democrats come up with these reasons and trying to convince the world that joe biden was in there saying get rid of that prosecutor he was taking one for the team and representing the european union. he was ridding the world of and a prosecutor. and if item was so hot on ukraine a prosecutor about apples, why did he not talk to obama while the ukraine was being attacked by russia, giving them javelins that they needed at the time. but no, he is to bring down the half of the company that is on the board of where he made 3 million bucks when he knew nothing about oil and energy.

>> this is not about ukraine, russia or racism or obstruction. it's about trying to say to the people who voted for donald trump, you people were stupid, you should never have voted for him, the fact that you stood in line to vote for him and that you one, that is simply acceptable to us, the ruling class so the ruling class is going to do everything that they can to know about an election but i hope voters remember, this is not about donald trump it's about them. it is to overturn their vote, not so much an attack against the president, it's an attack on the voters. let's never forget that. >> it is about them taking away or disenfranchising the american people. thank you. >> that's why they get so critical to get to the bottom. thank you judge. >> thank you governor. charlie, darrell and morehead.

next, america has been through an impeachment process before, but never like this. tom joined me next to breaking down. do not go away. ♪

president trump fighting back with left continues their attack my next guest is outraged mrs. this is not an impeachment process and not a regular one. judicial watch president joyce we know with more. good to have you here. what effect do you think there is with the failure of nancy pelosi to do the roll call vote to get 218 votes to create an official impeachment inquiry. >> appears trying to get documents out of the white house, it will be tough legally

if there subpoenas that they tried to enforce in the courts because the courts will be asking questions about the basis of the subpoena and the legislative intent? in the white house is going to say no, they don't have an impeachment inquiry, they're just fishing. we are prerogatives we have to protect. impeachment does not overrule the constitution, the president has rights both as president constitutionally and as a citizen. when the failure to allow him to exercise his rights suggest further that the corruption needs to be addressed more directly. in my view this is a kook not impeachment. >> the power's height when we talk about foreign affairs white house personnel and white house documents. and certainly with her whatever the joke is going on, it always

takes place in judiciary, never in intel. let's talk about the fact that the whistleblower never bothered to tell the inspector general that he had approached adam schiff office, adam schiff lied and said that no one had spoken to the whistleblower when during a month time they set up the whole narrative, got him a clinton lawyer, a democrat and friendly with a very high ranking democrat, cia member, all of that stuff is indicative of a narrative that they created, there almost in a rush to do this. get the information out, in the hopes of getting 218 votes. >> speed is on their side, it does not allow a fair investigation of what i consider being the underlying of how it became. it looks to me like there were

people in the ministration who were mishandling ensuring improperly classified information to target trump. they wanted to leak it out so they got it up which shifts world with the whistleblower complaint and thinking that would legalize it. but the other problem, they were communicating was shipped outside the ordinary process. schiff was lying about it and misstating what was in the underlying transcript and they all knew what was in the underlying transcript so they were misstating and mischaracterizing it so you have a option behind the launch of the impeachment inquiry. that's what needs to be investigated. >> if i were the president addressed the d.o.j. to see if there was illegal leaks with the latest camp. >> what will happen? >> who is going to investigate? >> i think that's the other

goal, to free the investigation not only of this but the spying illegally on president trump, this is as much about as protecting themselves from criminal investigations comey, clinton, obama et cetera into help freezing ministration as they did with mueller in the justice department and protect hillary for consequences and now they're worried about attorney general barr doing his job and the slight possibility of exposing him of what went on is enough to destroy the constitution and remove the president from protecting himself. this is a constitutional crisis caused by politicians who are abusing power to protect themselves from a criminal investigation. >> you know what is interesting, i found out when mitt romney came out, he was fullbore where they impeachment.

and i found out, when he ran for president in 2012, his nsa advisor was a guy by the name of joseph coffer black and it turns out, he is an individual close to romney and, a member of the board which might explain which mitt romney had so much venom when talking about this in the joe biden piece. when the friend is on the board and absolutely ukraine has indicated they will reinvestigate because the other case was closed apparently prematurely. >> half this town is on the payroll of foreign government. the idea that a presidential communication with a foreign head of state is scandalous when

you highlight, you have everyone with her hands in the dark for for foreign potent day, at the height of hypocrisy. it highlights where you talk about the senate, the senate will have to try in impeachment. and if i were the senate majority leader, this is on arrival, changing the rules, we are going to kill it before it gets out of the cradle. and we will not follow up with impeachment trial. we see the corruption here and we are not going to buy into and play your game and ratify your abusive power by further harassing the president with unnecessary impeachment trials. they should throw the charles out like the prosecutors would. >> google mitch mcconnell, will

have to listen to it and will have a trial. >> what is up with that, those are the current rules and i think american citizen should be asking mitch mcconnell to exercise the prerogatives, they run the senate there. and change the world. >> thank you so much. and charlie kirk still ahead. next, let's talk impeachment madness. plus his quest to get back into congress. don't go away. ...is more horsepower. (engines rev) if we were for everyone, we'd be for no one. with dodge power dollars, more power means more cash allowance. purchase now and get $10 per horsepower. that's $7,970 on the srt challenger hellcat redeye.

you should be mad at airports. excuse me, where is gate 87? you should be mad at non-seasoned travelers. and they took my toothpaste away. and you should be mad at people who take unnecessary risks. how dare you, he's my emotional support snake. but you're not mad, because you have e*trade, whose tech helps you understand the risk and reward potential on an options trade it's a paste. it's not liquid or a gel. and even explore what-if scenarios. where's gate 87? don't get mad. get e*trade and start trading today.

>> live from americas headquarters, according to reports the top north korean officials say that working level talks to the u.s. and sweden have hit a wall, the state department leap into releasing the statement, the early comments from the dtr k, do not reflect the content or spirit of today's eight half-hour discussion. the u.s. brought crate of ideas

and good discussions with the dtr k counterparts. they are also saying that the u.s. has accepted an invitation to continue talks in two weeks. meanwhile a political crisis was several days from antigovernment demonstrations. you can see in baghdad live ammunition and teargas. they hit 90 people, this comes after around the cookie was with us today. now back to justice enjoy your night. local. >> the democrats impeachment inquiry continues this week as president trump stared nancy pelosi the hold up. vote. my next guest is someone who spent some time on the hill, california congressman joined me now to weigh in. i'll call you congressman because i'm sure you're going to win and i'm sure going back.

but let's talk about the double standard. we have barack obama who is so invested in defeating donald trump 60 that he asked ukraine for dirt on paul manafort who is working on the trunk and paper can i ask why was it that they were interested or concerned about this conversation? >> because it was their president when it boils down to. ukraine was concerned to arrest, convict and punish the person who helped paul manafort. there is a double standard, it's amazing, president obama also spent half a million dollars of your tax dollars trying to defeat in another country and does not see anything wrong with her. the bottom line is transparent president and open anywhere he could be in all he gets is a premeditated impeachment looking

for something to charge him with. >> it is interesting, in front of me that ntf, this guy was convicted of meddling in the u.s. by the ukrainians because he gave information on paul manafort to the obama administration. i guess it does not work the other way. i want to talk about the javelins, whether or not there quid pro quo in the military aid. but in the obama administration, when you were in congress, president obama promised to treat the ukraine the way he would an nato ally. yes obama when ukraine was under attack by russia in the next crimea. the obama administration did absolutely nothing in terms of providing the javelins which are apparently the anti-aircraft, the defensive weapons, he did

nothing to provide them with it and assist ukraine, and basically left them on their own certainly not like the nato al ally. >> he even had to order the nato had the u.s. general to stand down because we made a commitment although they were not nato we made a commitment in return that we would treat them like an nato ally for purposes of defending and when we let that happen we gave a green light under the obama administration to annex quid pr. >> with the reset intel, i'll have more flexibly after the election, it's just outrageous the double theater. but you know the iraqi people as they look at this, they see the double standard and i wonder as

hard as the democrats are trying, it appears there's an abuse of power not so much by the republicans but by the democrats in trying to set up this impeachment without going through any kind of roll call or convert impeachment inquiry. >> obviously nancy pelosi has 31 members of her delegation who are in trump's eat and she does not want them to take any chances of not winning reelection. she was the hold the majority. ultimately, what we all know is impeachment is a political activity and losey is playing the political game and that's why she is not playing it like a legitimate impeachment she is playing. politics. >> when they subpoena the secretary of state, mike pompeo, i believe the subpoena was returnable yesterday, on friday. he vindicated that he is not going to be complying with the subpoena. should he be? >> when i was chairman of the oversight committee, i sent out

subpoenas, some answered and appropriately in some answered appropriately. in this case, conversations and activities directly related to the decision-making of the president is off-limits. the right answer, no, on that subject i will not answer to the subpoena and provide information. >> do they have any right answer about any conversation that they want to? the rules are changing everyday. is that what we will hear next? now china. >> when i served on the intelligence committee i used to come down to the bottom of the elevator and there was all these press people and assess what went on on a highly classified sanction. the right to ask and the right to receive are two different things. i had no problem with them asking and i'm quite pleased that the president on his own gave the transcript out right away. he openly even though he did not

have to. the bottom line, they were right to ask, he had a right to say no but he gave it anyway. >> darrell issa good to be with you this evening. i appreciate you being here. next charlie cook joins me lie. do not go away. local it's what gives audible there'smembers an edge.ening; it opens our minds, changes our perspective, connects us, and pushes us further. the most inspiring minds, the most compelling stories: audible.

time to get in a tree, nock an arrow, and disappear. this is what you've prepared for. he's moving more in daylight and whenever you can, you'll be hunting dawn to dusk. this is what you live for. it's your season. so hurry to great outdoor days at bass pro shops' and cabela's. where you can save big on great gear from top brands like redhead, cabela's and black out. bass pro shops and cabela's. your adventure starts here.

- my parents helped build it. - now we don't get wet when it rains. - i don't get too hot or too cold inside. - and i don't have to worry when the winds blow. this is my house. - this is my house. - this is my house. - this is my house. - my house. - my house. - i can play with my sister, i can play with my brother, i can play with my mother, my father, my family. - my family. - my family. - this is my house. - this is my house. - i can study. - i can be safe with my family. - this is my house. - this is my house. - this is my house. - this is my house. - my house. - my house. - this is my house.

- visit habitat.org to find out how you can help more families like mine have a safe, decent place to call home. >> i've never had a situation like this. we are trying to figure out #. [inaudible] >> that is woma congresswoman hw they are exploring how they do not comply with congressional subpoenas. joining me now with reaction the

former usa founder, charlie cook. >> first of all,. [laughter] she says we have never seen this before. my goodness, remember when eric holder had a subpoena due to fast and furious in the illegal gun operating with the cartels at the southern border and we lost a meetin amazing for the pl agent. heated direct subpoena from the house of direct doors. she is one of the most radical members of congress. i think the u.s. congress has had in any memory of all at all times. >> do you think she beats ill he >> she gets a calming feeling when two things of the holocaust. she was the one that had to be forcibly removed from a trump's

rally in a truck gathering in 2060. also she said we are going to impeach, and a not and i sort after that. she is very radical. and there is a base for this, this goes to show that the base of the democrat party is no longer union workers or carpenters or electricians. that is how the base of the top movement and because of this the democrats have moved further and further to the left to radicalize themselves and she is a byproduct of just that. >> when you talk about this, i remember in 16th when bernie sanders said i am a democrat socialist, i still don't know what that means, socialism for a democrat. i don't know. and everybody was surprised and now everybody says socialism is not about what has happened in the last few years, where are people coming from the have this

mentality. i know it's education and i know within schools, a lot is mainstream democrat party. >> i will tell you whatever happens on college campuses will soon happen in the halls of congress. i need need college radical is that congresswoman omar, congresswoman cortez talk about this because of the leading indicator for the culture in their leading indicator for the political conversation in the country. over the last couple of years we have seen radical elements go so far deep into the enter base of the democrat party. that's the work that we're doing a turning point usa. we traded each gratitude about being in america, not anger, i have not heard the squad say something nice about america in recent memory. it is noise negativity and anti-american, college campuses have been a place for that's

encourage and talk. now this president has offered an opportunity to feel what it's like to have a revitalization again in america with a booming economy. and strong borders. and you talk about this so effectively in your book. >> what to expect next from the left? how much for the left can they go? >> i want to reinforce a point i made earlier, as president trump has told the base away from them, instead of winning back the base and saying maybe there's something to be said about these immigration laws or the hard-working base they once had. there political strategy is to encourage more line cutting and border jumping on the southern border. it is one that is made at a lawlessness and radicalism that caters to the coastal malibu and manhattan and disenfranchise of manhattan and i believe this is

one of the main reasons why president trump would decisively went into 2020. >> a defense of entitlement for those who come illegally. charlie kirk thinking so much for being here. thank you so much for what you do. >> the legalities are illegalities for the impeachment process. i will talk about it all in a moment. ♪ the best eggs... in so many ways. which cage free eggs taste fresher and more delicious? only eggland's best. which organic eggs

have more vitamins and less saturated fat? only eggland's best. better taste, better nutrition, better eggs.

in the human brain, billions of nefor people with parkinson's, some neurons change their tune, causing uncontrollable tremors.

now, abbott technology can target those exact neurons. restoring control and harmony, once thought to belost forever. the most personal technology is technology with the power to change your life. >> the basic rules of democracy

are under attack from the president. unbelievable. the left has completely lost it. joining me now author of the new book coming out this tuesday, witch-hunt. greg jarrett. let's go straight to it, did the president commit an impeachable defense? >> it is not a crime, the conversation with ukrainian president so it's not high crime and misdemeanor, the department of justice career prosecutors looked at the conversation and said no crime, no violation of the campaign finance laws. so democrats are embracing this term abuse of power which they believe they can pick any reason at all and say this is an abuse of power. this is exactly what the framers feared that politicians and the opposing party would evict a president out of a personal animus or political difference.

that is fundamentally wrong. this is not an impeachable offense. the president conversation was a proper exercise of power, not an abuse of power, it's the democrats who are abusing their power of impeachment. >> there are people at this network, another judicial analyst who says that a thing of value can be information in violation of the federal campaign. that is not true. >> i respect them tremendously. >> is it true? >> no. >> information by itself has never been a thing of value under federal campaign laws, it's in my book extensively. but don't take my word for it, it's in the mueller report in the d.o.j. looked at it and said no crime. >> we clearly -- the former attorney general already ruled

on that. information is not a thing of value under the election campaign law. what do you say is so true. now they're talking about abuse of power talking about a fundamental oath of office. doesn't the president have an obligation to at least look into possible corruption and to protect the law of the land? >> the president is aware of a crime by high-ranking official. that is to say, misusing this position of power of benefit on a foreign government and exchange for something like protecting his son, then that is a violation under the foreign corrupt practices act which could be fraud, it's incumbent on on the president to ask for the information, asking is not an impeachable offense. we have a treaty with ukraine that obligates them to do with

asking them to do. and he also has a constitutional duty to take care clause that laws are faithfully executed. biden is not exempt from the laws simply because he is running for president. >> is certainly not an act, the amazing part is that the president did and has for a long time been talking about the genesis of the so-called counterintelligence investigation that worked into a criminal investigation without probable cause. it's not like he did it to get even or info on joe. i think honestly the president would like to run against joe biden. >> it was attorney general william barr who asked the president to make introductions with him and foreign governments in furtherance of his announced investigation of the origins of the trump russia collusion hoax and involves foreign

governments. and bar has been very active. durham has already been gaining information from ukrainians. so how is this an impeachable offense. it's utter nonsense. >> the durham, martin will come out with information very soon. >> they are not waiting for the ig, there will into the investigation into corruption for the fbi, d.o.j. and others. thank you so much. good to have you here. ...

the o...is more horsepower. horsepower... (engines rev) with dodge power dollars buy any challenger, charger, or durango and get ten bucks cash allowance for every one horsepower.

i waited to get treated. thought surgery was my only option. but then i found out about nonsurgical treatments. it was a total game changer. learn more about the condition at factsonhand.com i thought he was with you? no jack! (sfx: piano plays "twinkle twinkle little star" tommy? (sfx: audience laughing) don't stop. keep playing. (sfx: pianist playing masterful duet) here we go here's the fun part

>> finally tonight, radicals resistance and revenge a big hit on so many best seller's list hopefully have your copy but if you don't i'm hitting the road and coming to a city near you. join me at one of my upcoming book signings. october 16, i'll be in the villages in florida. october 17, lakeland, florida, and october 21, i'll be in yor melinda, california at the nixon library. head on over. go to my facebook page for more

information. and i look forward to meeting you thanks for watching i'm jea nine pirro, advocating for truth, justice and the american way. greg gutfeld is next, see you next week. >> let's be frank, a national nightmare is upon us the basic rules of democracy are attack under the president. >> oh, lighten up francis. >> [laughter] >> enough of you. so after three years of poking the bear, the bear poked back and who can blame him. they have been trying to impeach him from the day he got elected. president trump: they've been trying to impeach me from the day i got elected. >> [laughter] >> i don't even use fake any more. president trump: i don't even use fake any more. i call it the fake news