a group once again, we encourage you to dvr it if you can figure that out. godspeed. in the meantime, good night from washington. despair, great news. live from new york city comes the man at the helm of 9:00 p.m., hannity. there he is. >> sean: that might have been live from new york, it's saturday night. tucker, great show, as always. we begin tonight with a fox news alert. we are now tracking multiple major breaking stories, including an absolute bombshell development from the department of justice. fox news now reporting that the durham-bar investigation into the origins of the russian witch hunt is expanding. fox's reporting at this hour "mr. durham has expanded his investigation and is adding agents, resources" according to multiple senior ministries and officials fear timeline now has grown from the beginning of the probe, through the election, and now includes a postelection timeline, through the spring of 2017 come up until

when robert mueller was named special counsel. as we have reported on the show, durham and barr have spoken with multiple officials from the u.k., australia, even traveled to italy, all in an effort to determine if the most powerful tools of intelligence were used against our own citizens for the purpose of illegally spying on american citizens, of course to circumvent american laws and constitutional protection. by the way, that would be like fisa abuse, premeditated fraud. i hear one of the saddest things for my sources tonight, oh, they are worried they can ge get a conviction in d.c. that shouldn't matter, should it? the law is the law appeared was it verified or not verified? we will have answers to a lot of these questions coming. it officials circumvent u.s. law, outsource surveillance, in the other sense, on americans to allied spying agencies? in other words, you do this for us, and this way, we are innocent.

the trump campaign, where they hiretargeted by our own agencie? why was mueller appointed in the first place? according to another breaking fox news report, tonight, mueller was pursuing the open fbi director job when he met with donald trump in 2017, as the president has been saying. he didn't get that position, and a short time later, he was investigating the president, who passed him h over for a job. that would raise serious conflict of interest concerns, not to mention his close relationship with the man that trump fired, mr. super patriot, jim comey. by the way, the harlot's investigation uncover about super patriot himself? and mccabe and strzok, and many others who willfully committed fraud against the fisa cute. imagine if any of you committed a premeditated fraud on the court, you sign a document, an i application for a warrant, to take away the rights of an american citizen? backdoor to the trump campaign trump campaign's you could spy

on theti campaign, and later, hs transition team, and later, the presidency. let's play thist game at home. you think you would get away with any of that? it says "verified." you know you didn't verify it, that is premeditated fraud on a court. then when you know you lied to the court, you're supposed to go back and tell them. i just have a funny feeling if it happens to anybody in this audience, you would have a predawn raid, like manafort and roger stone. i've been saying this for a while, but what we witnessed in 2016 from our government, the biggest abuse of power, corruption scandal in our history. now, the truth is going to come out. the big question i have tonight: will they hold their own accountable? i have sources telling me tonight they might be afraid to do that bed with a full report on all of this is a very own catherine herridge tonight. >> thank you, sean, and good evening. a senior administration official confirms to fox news that the investigation to the genesis of the russia collusion case is

expanding based on the findings of u.s. attorney john durham. appointed b by the attorney general william barr in may, an investigation has global reach, with durum recently traveling to britain and italy to pursuit surveillance leads. the investigation also adding more agents, resources, and inexpanded timeline which now stretches from the spring of 2016, to may 2017 come on the president fired fbi director james comey and ask attorney general rod rosenstein, appointed special counsel robert mueller paired based on o my two decades covering intelligence and law enforcement, the expanded durham probe indicates he has found evidence that likely .2 imiminal wrongdoing by reputation, durham is not a prosecutor to ask for more help if there is simply no there there. separately, administration officials to fox news there is no scrutiny of the mueller appointment. coordination between rosenstein and mueller in the days before the announcement, as well as allegations rosenstein offered to where a wire with the

president from which he has denied. when mueller met with theh president on may 16th, 2017, he was indeed pursuing the post left open by the firing of comey a week earlier. newly released efforts back up the white house account. during his congressional testimony on the russia pope, mueller said he was not applying for a second term, but offering input on the required skills. >> sean: catherine herridge in washington tonight, thank you. also tonight, no longer going to refer to this ongoing political witch hunt, the latest witch hunt, on capitol hill, as any type of real impeachment inquiry. it is not. this is just the latest coup attempted over we the people, misconduct that doesn't exist yet. let us be clear, they never accepted the 2016 election results. they never accepted four separate investigations, no russia collusion. that, instead, was a coup attempt.

they went from one fishing expedition to another fishing expedition. russia, russia,russ russia. then the tax return coup attempt. then the stormy stormy coup attempt. now ukraine, ukraine, ukraine coup attempt. they could not accept the will of the people. compulsive, psychotic witch hunts, rooted in rage, and a lack of connection to reality that they lost. the same goal. let's impeach him, and oh, we have a lot of ways we can impeach him, nancy pelosi says. they've been plotting impeachment of this president from the very beginning, the moment he was elected. we will reminde you. speak with you takes the risks of going to trial and is convicted, that could be an impeachable offense. >> i don't see how that wouldn't be an impeachable offense. >> impeachment inquiry. >> impeachment. >> house impeachment. >> impeachment inquiry.

>> article of impeachment. >> impeachment. >> impeachment war. >> new development on the impeachment inquiry. >> impeachable. >> impeachment. >> impeachment. >> impeachment will be on the democrats agenda. >> articles of impeachment. >> impeachment. >> we are going to go in there, we're going to impeach vmfer. >> the i word. >> the i word. >> impeachment. >> let's take a look at the process of impeachment. >> impeachment. impeachment. >> he would have been impeached. >> all of it bringing impeachment. >> an impeachable offense. >> is that an impeachable offense? >> he is much more vulnerable to impeachment. >> impeachment. >> impeachment. >> articles of impeachment. >> there should be an impeachment inquiry opened. >> sean: there they are, talking impeachment. started two days after the

president's election for the hysteria we see over ukraine, that's just the latest coup attempt, the latest chapter in what has been three long years of lies, conspiracy theories, to take down a president that they never wanted elected in the first place i did everything they could do to prevent him from winning. also breaking moments ago, white house counsel has issued a letter to house democrats formally announcing the trump administration will not cooperate with the unconstitutional, invalid, baseless inquiry, because of three distinct issues. first,ry the inquiry is constitutionally invalid, violates basic due process rights and separation of powers. there has been no vote to offer authorize this inquiry, and that means no due process, no ability for the president's lawyers to cross-examine witnesses, nobility of the president's lawyer to call witnesses. no ability to enter evidence into the record. instead, all we got was a press conference from, yes, speaker in

name only, nancy pelosi, and the cowardly, shifty schiff. this is unprecedented and it's unconstitutional. the letter also goes on to state "the invalid impeachment inquiry plainly seeks to reverse the election of 2016 and to influence the election of 2020." according to the white house counsel, the effort to impeach president trump without regard to any evidence of his actionsre in office is a naked political strategy that began the day he was inaugurated, and perhaps before. i would argue before. impeachment is never to be used as a political weapon, only as a check against treason, bribery, high crimes, misdemeanors. and that brings us to the third issue raised by the white house counsel "there is no legitimate basis for your impeachment inquiry. instead, the committee's actions, they raise serious concerns." that would be like the cowardly schiff making up something of a transcript that didn't exist. where they announced the impeachment hearing, oh, we have

a variety of options if there is no quid pro quo there. democrats claim the inquiry is about so-called whistle-blower, nonwhistle-blower, account of a phone call between president trump and the president of ukraine. well, the inquiry was announced before democrats even saw the t transcript of the call, or did they? what did schiff know and when did he know it? he is now the lead investigator running this committee. he wouldes be a material, fact witness in this case, wouldn't he? that would then cause him to have to recuse himself. by the way, perfectly appropriate conversation with the president. we have the transcript. no need for nonwhistle-blower whistle-blowers. of the government ofwh ukraine s said the call was totally appropriate. the u.s. department of justice has said the appropriate. the u.s. ambassador to the european union said the president did nothing wrong. the special envoy to ukraine, kurt volker, testified under oath, behind closed doors, no quid pro quo.

no misconduct, no nothing. and let's not forget the transcript has been released for everybody to see. we don't need a nonwhistle-blower whistle-blowerss account, and their feelings, and their political bent on any of this. here's what congressman lee zeldin had to say about this very issue earlier today. let's take a look. >> maybe you should ask what was said inside of volker's deposition? during his transcribed interview, with regards to adam schiff's fairy tale quid pro quo charge that aids from the united states to ukraine was being linked to an investigation into the bidens. what did ambassador volker say about that? h that's a great question, i'm glad you asked, and i will tell you the reason that question was so important for you to ask is for many things. he was in this room for several hours. and during several hours of testimony, he talked about how president zelensky had no idea there was a hold on eight at the time july 25th call. ambassador volker testified about the readouts of the phone call that was made to him, that

there was nothing in the readouts about there being a hold on u.s. aid or a quid pro quo. and by the way, no on no what ee ambassador volker testified to? 's entire time, the aide was going to get released, and guess what happened? a the aide got released. what didn't have to happen, there was no new investigation to get created for this whole thing is a fairy tale. adam schiff is misleading you, and you are playing along with it. when adam schiff said, for example, theda president trump s asking president zelensky to manufacture dirt on the bidens, do you know it ambassador volker testified to? that was absolutely untrue. >> sean: and for weeks, the cowardly, lying adam schiff, well, he wanted you to believe president trump threaten to withhold u.s. aid to ukraine if it didn't investigate sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle joe 30330 and his sons to shady deals, for weeks, schiff's stenographers,

the media mob, trump-ukraine quid pro quo, yet again, one big giant hoax, another lie, another conspiracy theory. three long years. one witch hunt after another. one coup attempt after another. tonight, we have brand-new evidence provingt beyond any shadow of a doubt, the left hysteria is once again built on another bed of lies. an investigative reporter john solomon has acquired documentation showing that a new investigation was opened by the prosecutor general four months before the phone call with our president and the ukrainian president, zelensky, under ukraine's prior president. and that's not all, john solomon reporting also tonight, one focal point of the investigation was whether any of the $3.4 million in proceeds that burismaur holdings paid to huntr biden's firm betweenay 2014 and

2016 came from illicit sources. this happened months before the phone call in question, which is, by the way, huge, but even more. we have brand-new details about the nonwhistle-blower whistle-blower. a professional tie to a 2020 democratic candidate. that means he or she worked with for four and one of the democrats that is running against trump. i will be a conflict of interest, especially when they are giving hearsay evidence in the first place for let's recap their nonwhistle-blower whistle-blower. registered democrat. clear political bias. professional relationship with one of the 2020 democrats who want be trump. t his complaint based on hearsay, not firsthand knowledge. and also, media reports. doesn't even matter what his complaint claims, because we know now, from the transcript,o what was said and what wasn't said, don't we?e? and by the way, the common question shows no quid pro quo.

nothing! no funds were withheld from ukraine. ukrainian officials didn't even know the president wasow considering delaying aide at the time of the call. they didn't know until a month later, two top diplomats in europe said the president did n. and how the cowardly adam schiff, a known liar, and nancy pelosi nancy pelosi, another liar, who has lost all control over her party in the house. they want to boot a duly-elected president from office for nothing. what? a coup, and an attempt at every democrat must go on record abou. so called -- by the way, these so-called moderates, in other words, the democrats that live in districts that donald trump won in 2016, they don't speak out against this unconstitutional attempted coup and witch hunt, they would be complicit, an illegal attempt to override the will of the american voter. now, there ise real, corruptiond

and real quid pro quo, we h actually have on tape. i will be joe 30330 in the country of ukraine, because as the media mob tries to ignore that brewing scandal, senator lindsey graham, he is now invited the former new york city mayor rudy giuliani to testify before congress with his lengthy investigation, don't forget, we learned from "politico," what did we learn? oh, yeah, ukraine was helping hillary come in they were involved in election interference in 2016. joe, well, he shook down ukrainu and said you have six hours. you fire that prosecutor, or i'm taking my billion dollars -- our billion dollars, american people's billion dollars -- and i'm going home. you're not going to get it. and wow, they fired him. and he bragged about it. here with more on this breaking report, brand-new -- by the way, starting tonight, we can yofficially announce investigative reporter and a fox news contributor, john solomon, welcome to the family.

>> yes, thank you so much, it's great to be joining you guys officially. sean, i think you hitde it on te head, right from the beginning. i can confirm to you tonight that the u.s. c government had open source intelligence and was aware as early as february of 2019 that the ukrainian government was planning to reopen the burisma investigation. this is long m before the president ever imagined having a call at president zelensky. in fact, it's before president zelinski was even elected. this is a significant shift in the factual timeline. this is information that was omitted from the whistle-blower's complaint. let me tell you what we learn today. the u.s. government was aware through open source intelligence in february that an fbi-like agency in new york ukraine that fightscorruption, y joe biden, he requested a reopen of the investigation into bre's mama, its owners, and unusual

transactions in the burisma accounts. march 20th, 2019, the general prosecutor's office agreed to the request opened an investigation, and they filed a 15 page notice of suspicion, alleging that there may be illicit arms that were running through burisma through 2010 come all the way through 2015. that's important, because hunter biden was on the board for 2014 and 2015. specifically, that notice of suspicion said they were looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to hunter biden's firm may have been part of the illicit funds moving through the company. a month later, in april, the prosecutor's office, open source intelligence -- again, u.s. government officials confirming they were aware of this, made a request of another investigative agency in ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records. that is a significant change in the timeline.e. it was omitted from the whistle-blower's complaint, and the question is, did he not know it, or did he exclude it because

it didn't fit the narrative he was trying to write? that's a question for congress to answer. >> sean: youth know, it's funny, because we've got biden on tape, don't we? >> we do. >> sean: i would like to know what exactly -- i guess hunter biden is 49 years old, he's not aa kid. but this is multimillion dollars we are talking about. can we get answers as to what exactly he did with no expertise in ukraine, in oil, gas, or energy?t just like there's no background we can find with him in china or private equity, and that was a lot more money. according to peter schweizer,d who joins us tonight, 1.5 billion. so how is it that it is on tape, he is bragging about a shakedown using taxpayer money as leverage, and getting what he wanted. the prosecutor fired, and the prosecutor signed an affidavit, did he not come under the threat of perjury, that in fact he was fired because of biden? because of the six-hour threats and the threat of withdrawing

american dollars and loan guarantees? >> that's right. listen, there's another oddity that comes out of the records. if you go back and put this back on screen, these are bank records from hunter biden's firm. if you remember, hunter biden and joe biden keep saying he was getting paid $50,000 a month. there is just one thing wrong with that. the fbi raided devon archer's office and bank records in an unrelated case in 2016. they show transfers of $166,000 a month, as high as $220,000 in one month, going into hunter biden and devon archer's firm. that's's a lot more than $50,00, and it was one of those things that teach the ukrainian prosecutor's interest in reopening the case in march of 2019. the size of the money was much larger than joe biden and hunter biden have been saying. >> sean: al all right, let's go back. we have the affidavit of his prosecutor. of the prosecutors on record saying he got fired for this reason. we have multiple -- there's no explanation.

how is it that the mob and the media -- you've got quid pro quo here. you've got your legal actions here. how do they ignore that part of the story and say it is a conspiracy theory? and joe biden, you know, very defensively keep saying, there's nothing to this story, nothing to this story. there really is a lot to the story. >> listen, the media is stuck on one thing, which is that the united states government, hunter biden's control, and its allies in western europe, were saying for some time that he was corrupted and should be removed. even if that were the case, joe biden should have recused himself under the u.s. ethics laws paired let's leave that aside for a second, go back to some documents we talked about on your show two weeks ago. hunter biden's on american legal team, when they first meet with the prosecutor after joe biden fires shokin, a new guy put in place, they mutely tell him there was a dirty trick campaign, a false information ce shokin look like he was corrupt

so they could get him out of there. that ought to be investigated peer listen, who knows what the truth is until we dig in? with the idea that the media has sunk into one theory of the case for looking at the other fact, they are not doing their job. a lot a fact to run against the current narrative that adam schiff and joe biden and th telling,-blower are and we need to get the specs on the table and examine them fairly before we make any conclusions paired >> sean: all right, last question. i keep hearing the ig report is going to be devastating, but then i'm hearing on the other hand, well, a lot of considerations about whether they can get a conviction. what they will do is embarrassem everybody. and i'm thinking, well, either there is premeditated fraud on a fisa court, which we know happened. we know they lied. we know the statute also demands that whene they find out the truth, that they go back to the court and tell him the truth. that never happened. is that the swamp protecting the swamp? is that the likely outcome of

this, john solomon? >> i think we need to wait and see. we just saw the expansion of the term investigation. >> sean: birdies are singing in my ear. >> i've always said i thought it was weird to be a hard case for the justice department to prosecute. i still believe that. >> sean: okay, so that means anybody in his audience wouldate able to bring false information, they know it's false, swear that it's true, and get a warrant to take away the rights of an american citizen, spy on a presidential candidate,, transition team, and president, and you don't get indicted for that, john solomon? >> i hope that isn't true.ab i hope there is accountability, but let's first see the's facts before you make any conclusions paired >> sean: we already know the facts. don't we know there was fisa fraud? we know the facts. >> i guarantee you are going to learn a lot more facts in the next twooi weeks on the fisaor report comes out. there is explosive new information in there. >> sean: thank you. when we come back to my lot breaking news tonight. andy mccarthy, pete hegseth, dan bongino, they react to all of this and more, straight

ahead. ♪ as a doctor, i agree with cdc guidance. i recommend topical pain relievers first... like salonpas patch large. it's powerful, fda-approved to relieve moderate pain, yet non-addictive and gentle on the body. salonpas. it's good medicine. hisamitsu.

douglas! we're running dangerously low on beans. people love your beans, doug. they love 'em. doooooooooug!

you want to go sell some tacos? progressive knows small business makes big demands. doug, where do we get a replacement chili pepper bulb? so we'll design the insurance solution that fits your business. it's a very niche bulb. it's a specialty bulb. billions of problems. morning breath? garlic breath? stinky breath? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath fresh breath oral rinse instantly fights all types of bad breath and works for 24 hours. so you can... breathe easy. there's therabreath at walmart.

here, hello! starts with -hi!mple... how can i help? a data plan for everyone. everyone? everyone. let's send to everyone! [ camera clicking ] wifi up there? -ahhh. sure, why not? how'd he get out?! a camera might figure it out. that was easy! glad i could help. at xfinity, we're here to make life simple. easy. awesome. so come ask, shop, discover at your xfinity store today.

♪ >> sean: all right, tonight we have learned john durham is expanding his probe into the origins of the russia probe. meanwhile, fox news has learned that mueller was in fact pursuing the fbi director job in 2017 peer that is contrary to what he testified to under oath. here with more reaction to that explosive headline, author of brand-new book "exonerated," fox news contributor dan bongino. also, fox news contributor andy mccarthy, and "fox & friends" weekend cohost pete hegseth. andy, let me start with you. okay, joe biden on tape, bragging about a shakedown. i said you are not getting the billion. you have six hours. fire him in six hours, or you are not getting the billion

dollars. then we find out that it was hih son making all this money with ukraine and burisma holdings, no apparent experience with ukraine, oil, gas, or energy. i would like to know exactly what he did in his position for them. but nobody seems to care about that part. is there anything in the transcript that p you read thats inappropriate by the president of the united states, in his conversation, and you see a problem with what joe biden did? > well, i do see a problem wh what biden did in the sense that he had a conflict of interest, because his son had this position. as far as with the president said in the transcript, i think that asking zelensky, the ukrainian president, for assistance in barr's investigation is fine. that's the kind of thing that is done all the time, asking another government for assistance in ourr investigations. asking him about biden getting a

prosecutor fired, also seems fine to me, because it's an element of barr's investigation to show the obama administration was leaning on ukrainian authorities to investigate manafort, and potentially others in the trump campaign. then it's very relevant to that bidener had that kind of influee and control over the ukrainians. i would prefer if the president hadn't gotten into biden's son, because to my knowledge, there was no justice department investigation into hunter biden, and that does go on the line toward a president using his control over foreign policy -- >> sean: hang on a second. andy, i have january 11th, i have 2017 "politico," it outlines in great specificity the election interference of the ukrainians in 2016 on hillary's behalf.

now we have joe biden on tape demanding the firing using our tax dollars. as the president pointed out in the call with the zelensky, a lot of corruption came from there. he goes on to state unequivocally how ukraine interfered with our elections. then we got the whole biden issue. why shouldn't we get to the bottom -- the president, who is sworn -- >> you are mixing up two different things. >> sean: i don't think i'm mixing up anything. >> you are mixing up different things. going into what biden did with the ukrainians, that is joe biden, that is fine and seems relevant to barr's investigation. i don't see what hunter biden has to do with the 2016 election. i just don't see it. >> sean: i'm not conflating the two. if they are two separate things that matter and we ought to get to the bottom of. let me bring in pete. >> they do matter. the question is should the president has leaned on the

ukrainian president under those circumstances to get that information? >> sean: the president does have an obligation, and oath, does he not, constitutionally? they fully execute, uphold the laws of the land. the tape of biden bragging about shaking down ukraine, that would be wholly appropriate, to me. he's watching the news like everybody else, and he knew about the reports about hunter biden. that, to me, would be appropriate. we ought to get to the bottom of this, like the rest of the mess that ukraine admits they helped hillary clinton, and the "politico" acknowledges that they did play a role. you've got the two of them, and they are both relevant tond me. >> well, look, if you're going to take the position that that makes it t relevant, and that therefore -- >> sean: you don't think the tape makes it relevant? >> what i'm about to say is that if that is going to be your position, what the other side is going to say is you're going to have to reevaluate whether the

investigation that was done on the trump campaign was driven by rightful suspicion or not. >> sean: pete. >> you can't have it both ways, either it is or it isn't. >> you can't come in here is part of the overarching problem. lies spread quickly, but it takes time for the truth to emerge.he the lead to this segment was the durham investigation, the single most important investigation in this country right now. looking at 2016, thought it only went through the inauguration, and i would goes through the ospring of 2017 because they are looking at the appointment of the special counsel, where bob mueller, what you talked about tonight is extremely significant. he sat in front of the president of the united states, lied to congress about this, said he was never up before the fbi director job. he interviewed for the job with the president when he knew that he and his buddy, rod rosenstein, had already made a deal that he would be the special counsel if he doesn't get the job. so when you look at why

president trump might be frustrated with what foreign governments might know, durham and barr are talking to foreign governments about what they may have known or participated in, based on what the deep state -- which is not so deep, because it's actually quite at the top of that deep state, with rosenstein and comey and mueller, they were collaborated, and durham has a chance to getco to the bottom. you talk to average grassroots supporters of this president, they still demand accountability, and the president channels that. that's what he asked these questions, because it hasn't been delivered yet. >> sean: dan bongino, let's switch names, vice president trump. i'm sure he would hate the demotion. instead of hunter, it's don jr. and vice president trump was doing the bragging about leveraging our tax money. >> yeah, this is kind of hysterical when you think about it. we don't have to bother switching the names, sean, it already happened. remember when they complained about the trump tower moscow project -- by the way, that never happened. no money ever changed hands.

don jr. actually doesoe real estate, and build buildings paired so let me get this straight, a perfectly legal construction project was turned into an international scandal, although not a brick was ever lg dollar ever changed hands. yet hunter biden, with zero experience a natural gas, ukraine, or ukrainian natural gas,s, get $80,000 plus a month gig? you couldn't find someone else who actually has propane in their house, or someone who has more experience than hunter biden? i mean, come on! this thing stinks to the heavens. anybody, without wearing rose-colored glasses, can see -- >> sean: to answer andy's question, he's looking into all of it. the president has -- we have an obligation and a duty, he has an obligation, constitutional duty, to see that this type of corruption doesn't happen. i would argue that is a mandate for him. >> do you think he has done not across the board, sean?

>> sean: i do. >> every place there is corruption, he has looked into corruption? >> sean: well, i see it in this particular case. >> i'm asking across the board -- you said he has a duty to do this. >> sean: that's right. >> i'm asking -- >> sean: pay attention to the answer. in this country, we now live in a country post-constitutional america, where you spy on a presidential candidate, transition, and presidency. to answer your question, we spent three years on foreign country interference, yet it happened, nobody cares about it having happened true or false? >> that's false. i think a lot of people care jout it happened but i just wrote a book about it happening. >> sean: okay, tell me who else is talking about ukraine, and their support of hillary in the last election? not many people. not many people are looking -- >> sean, there's a lot of people looking into this, and it should be looked into.

but in this case, if the nepotism of politically connected families, whether the clintons or thee bidens, use their positions to enrich themselves, yet that is the very thing they are accusing this president of doing, even though he goes to try to change that equation. >> sean: all right, thank you all for being with us. when we come back, president trump says hillary should jump into the race for 2020. wait until you hear hillary's response to your lara trump is here and ways in next. ♪

♪ >> sean: all right, the radical 2020 field of democratic, extreme, radical socialists, that's an example, the one-time front-runner, joe 30330, he is losing ground. elizabeth warren facing major questions over yet another glaring live, we will have more on that later tonight. meanwhile, guess who is tempted to jump into the race yet again?

none other than twice failed presidential candidate hillary clinton for the president today dared her to make another run for it she tweeted "don't tempt me, do your job." here with reaction to that ted moore, senior advisor to donald j. trump for president, president trump's daughter-in-law, lara trump. okay, she wants to get in, i guess the water is warm. but it looks like it is elizabeth warren's to lose. she's going to give us top marginal tax rate of 70%, 90% for corporations. we are also going to forgive all tuition for the new green deal, and a wealth tax. is not going to work? and medicare for all? >> it sounds great, doesn't it, sean? first of all, i want to double down on the president and say of hillary clinton would like around two with donald trump, please, let's do that. i would love to see a round 2 between donald trump and hillary clinton, because i think we all remember, sean, not too

long ago come all of the media said she was going to be the next president. we see donald trump in the white house now. it would be so easy to win. i think it will be easy to win with any of these candidates. you are talking about elizabeth warren now, who does look to be, i guess, the best hope they have been maybe that is why they're trying to bring hillary back out, because they see how bad these candidates really are. they have known from the beginning that they can't beat donald trump. the reality is people in this country are winning again. donald trump has brought jobs back to this country. he has the lowest unemployment in the history of the country right now, pretty much across the board, we've ever seen. he's winning on all fronts for the american people, they feel it every day, so while the mainstream media tries to pull the wool over their eyes while the democrats try these ridiculous impeachment type scenarios, time after time, that never worked because it's all nonsense, donald trump is going to win because the american people feel the results of the trump presidency every single day.

if it's elizabeth warren, hillary clinton, we are ready. the president is willing to take one member on because we know he is going to win. >> sean: if russia is a coup attempt, taxes are coup attempt -- everything, they want impeachment. i did the impeachment timeline, it started two days after he was elected. they were obsessed with it. but this is particularly interesting to me, because we read of the transcript, everyone wants to talk about the whistle-blower, nonwhistle-blower's interpretation of the transcript, we all read. nothing on there that says quid pro quo. the president wanting, to think andy mccarthy is dead wrong on all of this. the president wanting to get to the truth of the election interference of ukraine on behalf of hillary and the last election could we spent three years debating that a fair number two, joe biden on tape admitting he leveraged a billion taxpayer dollars, demanding the

firing of a ukrainian prosecutor. why would a vice president do that, and no one is allowed to talk about that? >> yeah, that is quid pro quo right there, sean. i think it is perfectly acceptable for the president of united states too want to clariy exactly what happenedun there, because quite frankly, i think the american people deserve to what they're vice president was doing with awa billion dollars, and we hear on tape, like you said, he tells the prosecutor, this guy has to go, this other prosecutor has to go. it's such a double standard, though, whatever you see what they're trying to do to this president. to your point to come we have all seen the transcript. there is nothing there. sean, they called for the impeachment inquiry before they even knew what was in this transcript, before they even knew what was in the phone call. it doesn't matter. they want this presidentre i would. they are desperate, and they're trying to do anything they can, but it's not going to work.i i hate to tell them. >> sean: pelosi is like we can impeach him for many reasons, we will find something. you look at all of that, i'll green got it right when he

said we better impeach him because we are not going to beat him. >> that's it, he knew from the very beginning, and we knew, too appeared they will never impeach him, they will never get him out because he is in for four more years for the american people, thank goodness. >> sean: the american people are not going to take these coup attempts. we get to see your better half -- well, you are his better half, eric tomorrow. we look at the radical 2020 field, do they have a shot? we will find out next. ♪ i wish i could save faster. you're making good choices. you'll get there. ♪ were you going to tell me about this? i know i can't afford to go. i still have this car so you can afford to go. i am so proud of you. thanks. principal. we can help you plan for that. start today at principal.com.

woman 1: i had no symptoms of hepatitis c. man 1: mine... man 1: ...caused liver damage. vo: epclusa treats all main types of chronic hep c. vo: whatever your type, ask your doctor if epclusa is your kind of cure. woman 2: i had the common type. man 2: mine was rare. vo: epclusa has a 98% overall cure rate. man 3: i just found out about my hepatitis c. woman 3: i knew for years. vo: epclusa is only one pill, once a day, taken with or without food for 12 weeks. vo: before starting epclusa, your doctor will test if you have had hepatitis b, which may flare up, and could cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. vo: tell your doctor if you have had hepatitis b, other liver or kidney problems, hiv, or other medical conditions... vo: ...and all medicines you take, including herbal supplements. vo: taking amiodarone with epclusa may cause a serious slowing of your heart rate. vo: common side effects include headache and tiredness. vo: ask your doctor today, if epclusa is your kind of cure.

♪ >> sean: all right, elizabeth warren still in hot water tonight after resurfaced video suggesting she lied on the campaign trail when telling a story about being retired from teaching or "being visibly pregnant." according to the "washington

free beacon," the board of education voted unanimously to extend water and a second year of teaching. still, water and defiant, telling cbs news, "i knew i was 222, six months pregnant, and te job that i had been promised was going to someone else." our problem with the truth is nothing new. here with reaction, karl rove, charlie hurt. in between what they're trying to do, and likely now calling to do with impeachment the president, which they won't get impeachment on pier one coup attempt after another, elizabeth warren seems like the likely favorite for the nomination. where do youn see the election going? >> well, it's going to be a tough election. the democrats will throw everything they can at the president. by the time we get around to selecting the democratic nominee next spring, they will have dusted him up with impeachment, and they will becoming hard after him. the president can't take this for granted but she is left

wing, out there on the fringe, but they have been in the real clear politics, i think 45 polls such far this year, with president trump and elizabeth warren. he has let her in five, the last in july, and been tied with her in five, she has bentee ahead of him in 35 out of 45 polls. admittedly not by much, 4.5 points in the real clear politics average, with the president cannot take a race against elizabeth warren for granted, and he is going to need to dig in and show the difference between the two of them in great detail. he's also going to have to show he has a vision for second term that's better than the vision she is offering for her first. >> sean: do you think the american people see this, karl, and i find it repulsive? we have an election in a year, y okay, this doesn't work, i'll just find another reason to impeach him. to me, they want him out of office, period. they never accepted that he won,

they never accepted the mueller report to. >> look, this is why -- i thought the tone the president had a day or two a go, i understand he doesn't feel fairly treated by h the system, that it is distinctly unfair. i thought his tone a day or two ago was good. basically, it's a witch hunt, but i'm going to stay focused on the big things the american people want me to do. he's got a chance here, with the china trade deal, with usmca, with the other initiatives of the administration, even in the midst of having anything thrown at him by the democrats, he is still focused on what he think is best for the american people. think that would be a strong contrast. >> sean: his list of promises made and kept are pretty promising. charlie? >> i t think the democrats realy shot themselves in the foot. for all of the flaws that joe biden had, i think he was probably their best shot at trying to steal back those voters that donald trump stole from them in 2016. and it looks like, in this whole effort to destroy the president,

they've taken out that best chance. people like elizabeth warren, the proposals she is pedaling, i talked to a lot of democrats back home, i don't ever hear anyone say, you know what i really want? i want someone to decriminalize border crossing. i want free health care for illegal aliens. that is something you never hear democrats back home talk about it, and then you add on top of the fact that she apparently has a real problem with the truth and is willing to make p up stories relating to absolutely anything -- >> sean: you are convinced she gets it. >> i think there is a very good chance she gets it. >> i think charlie is right on that, but we have a long way to go, and there could be a lot of twists and turns. i think the field has collapsed down to biden, wall iran, maybe sanders, though he mishandled tt attack thing and may not be able to recover from damaging his credibility with

the american h people, let alone his health. we've got to be careful. she is about ready to get her turn in the barrel, and how she handles it will be a big test, and there is a chance for biden to come back, but this thing has a long way to go before it gets settled. >> must read, charlie? >> whoever the nominee is, donald trump and his supporters have to treat it like the fight of their life, because it's going to be tough. >> sean: thank you, guys. coming up, or villain of the day. after this. when we started our business

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. . .

>> sean: congressman alexandria ocasio-cortez is now suggesting we abolish prisons. great, we'll let everybody go free. murderers, rapists. tweeting, we need to have a real conversation about the, prison abolition in this country. bad idea t because there are

really bad people in the world. we need to keep them behind bars. that's all the timepe we have lt this evening. we always thank you for joining us and we will never be the hato trump media mob, let not your heart be troubled. straight from the sewer, the swamp, laura ingraham. >> laura: you know something, if there is just one night where it wasn't sewer swamp, laura ingraham, that would be great. >> sean: i'm not saying you are the sewer, the swamp. >> laura: the way it kind of tripped off your tongue. >> sean: i can get fined for saying "illegal alien" the wrong way. >> laura: i'd take that case. i'm still a member of the bar. that's a fun case to take to court. fantastic show. i'm laura ingraham, this is "the ingraham angle," in a blistering letter to democratic leaders, the white house counsel is making it clear this means war. and fox news has also