up next, see you next sunday, when the next revolution will be televised . hello america, i am mark levin, this is life, liberty and levin, special edition, the house goes rogue. i thought i would talk to you slowly go through the process, that we're dealing with as american citizens. the constitution article i second 2, house of representative shall have sold power of impeachment. past mutua impeachments it was l

process, a rational process, a bipartisan process that involved both political parties whether it was johnson, nixon or clinton. both political parties could call witnesses, they could cross-examine, both political/ politicalcarter parties could get depositions and so far. goal was on the get as much body politic involved as possible. this is first time in american history, we have a rogue speaker of the house, and a small majority democrat party in house of representatives that trying to drag our country in a different direction, rejecting the background of the impeachment process when it comes to president of the united states remember this report? remember this? not that long ago. remember this? this is a mueller report. two and a half years of so-called russia collusion. remember, that two volumes yoo.

year and year, news story, after news story, does not matter, we have moved on, it did not cut it. that was their first impeachment report, then they bring mr. mueller in, this was a hell of a hearing, he didn't even know what he wrote, becausely done write it, that went belly up. they had these subpoenas. 2800 could they had 19 lawyers most partisan, 40 fbi agents and analysts, they went to or spoke to 19 different countries. to chase down nothing. nothing, this is the same house of representatives, now that is bringing up ukraine. all of a sudden, ukraine. we go from russia to ukraine. how did that happen? the democrats, nancy pelosi and six committee chairman, i call them her pullet bureau are

running rough shod trying to, issuing letters they call subpoenas if they were not replied to in a certain given time, they claim that to be obstruction of justice, it is not a court. they mean obstruction of the house. they are trying to set up the president and set up the administration, the demands are onerous. the process, you see, is ahistorical. and president's counsel wrote a letter to the members of the house, they said, you deny the president the right to cross-examine witnesses, to call witness to receive transcript of testimony to have access to evidence. to have counsel is present, in other words basic due process, even though this is not a criminal matter, cereal murdersl

murder -- serial murderers get more due process, terrorists get more due process than president of united states coequal subpoena power, i did some research. and i found something, look at this. what in the world is this? well. this is from october 7, 1998. report together with -- what kind of report is it? a committee of the judiciary. 1998. what was happening in 1998 -- oh. a house impeachment inquiry of bill clinton. and this judiciary committee which was run by th the republi, chairman henry hyde of illinois, they decide to repair a resolution. why? for full house of representative, say that it is intention of the commit its investigation will be conducted in all respects on a fair,

imparral and bipartisan or nonpartisan basis in the spirit the power to authorize subpoenas, is committed by this resolution in the first instance to chairman and ranking minority member, acting jointly. if either declines to act. the other way act alone, subject to right of other prefer the question to the committee for decision prior to issuance. and a meeting of the committee convened promptly to consider the question, in other words, the chairman, and the ranking member, democrat and the republican, will have equal ability to to issue is u subpoe. if there is a that will, the full committee hears it, that is done in public am that not happening today, the democrats are only one that can issue subpoenas and cross-examine. it went on, the committee met in

opened session. and a vote 21-16, need for resolution, they write. because the issue of impeachment is of such overwhelming importance, the committee decided is must receive authorization from full house, before any course of action -- this is them, because. if it is delegated by house of representatives, the full house of representatives should be involved in critical decision makes, involving various stages of impeachment. you see how bill clinton was treated? also a resolution authorizing impeachment inquire to conduct of a president is consistent with past practice they write. impeachment of president johnson was set in motion by a resolution. authorizing a general

investigation as to the execution of the laws. they go on. the mutual a impeachment investf president nixon was authorized by the full house, during debate in 1974. chairman then chairman of committee on judiciary stated we've reached a point it is important that house confirm our responsibility under the constitution, we're asking the house to authorize and direct the committee judiciary to investigate the conduct of the president of the united states he further says, such a resolution hassual way always bn passed by the house, and committee voted -- that house of representative adopt this regular, a necessary step if we're meet our obligation. wow. andrew johnson, richard nixon, bill clinton, all treated differently than president

trump, why is that? we'll get to that. president's procedural rights, also in this resolution. respects impeachment inquire to bill clinton. and inou encourage committee adt rules similar to those in 1974, investigating nixon. provide the president with certain procee pro -- proceduraa number of protection for the president. to attend all executive session in open committee hearings and cross-examine witnesses and may have objections regarding the pertinentsy of evidence and invited too suggest they can receive additional evidence and lastly, shall be invited to

respond to evidence and appropriate time. the provisions will ensure that impeachment inquiry is fair to the president. october 7, 1998. the impeachment inquiry resolution respecting bill clip clinton. went to full house of representative. this is how a republican controlled house, treated bill clinton. not like nancy pelosi. the president of united states denied right to cross examine witnesses, and call republicansewitnessesand receiv. no due process, this is not the way our constitution works, democrat parties hijacked house of representatives. it does not speak for the full house, because the full house has not spoken.

democrat parties is pushing this impeachment, this is a democrat party impeachment, as i have been saying, a silent coop effort if their is why they dispense with all traditions involving last 3 presidents who went through this process, you know why else? they don't have anything, they don't, mueller report did not give them anything, mueller testimony did not give them anything, there is no russia collusion, there is no ukraine collusion, it is worse. ladies and gentlemen, worse. house democrats eager to protect the whistleblower, what kind of whistle-blowerrer is this? in hiding? we know the names of the whistleblowers, they come out, they plow blow a whistle, they t lawyers, public can see who they are, this is a cia, operative. he is a rogue person. who decided to use his position at the white house to essentially spy on the president

of the united states that is what he did. gathering information on the president of united states, noi first hand information what so ever. none. so what did you the house want to do? democrats, house democrats eager to protect the whistleblower who raised alarms over president trump pressure a foreign leader to -- we'll get to that considering testimony, at a remote location, possibly be on curings individual a appearance and voice. that not what they are doing. that i want to prevent the president of united states and his lawyers from doing what lawyers do. what someone accuses you of something. checking their credibility. questioning them, looking into their background, it is bigger, we the people of america we have a right to know who this person is, if this person is going to be used and wants to be used by

democratic party in house to bring down the president of the united states they are concerned -- god forbid. who has agreed to answer questions before the intelligence committee in house and senate, democrat overseeing logistics of the testimony for house impeachment inquiry are discussing a location away from the capital, maybe the dnc. and a staff only session. from a separate location. by a video hook up. -- what the hell is this? you are going to try to remove the president of united states, without the president, without ththe american people knowing anything about the accuser except whats democrats, media and his lawyers top tel to tell.

they are waiting to strength their witness, as they paints characterization of this individual, who is a coward, a coursecoward, more when i come . ♪ to walk along the lonely street of dreams ♪ ♪ here i go again on my--- you realize your vows are a whitesnake song? i do. if you ride, you get it. geico motorcycle. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more.

they're america's bpursuing life-changing cures. in a country that fosters innovation here, they find breakthroughs... like a way to fight cancer by arming a patient's own t-cells... because it's not just about the next breakthrough... it's all the ones after that.

>> welcome back to special life, liberty and levin, the house gone rogue. in addition to knowing that president, same rights -- to denying this president same rights this prior presidents had, johnson, nixon and clinton. more, more is going on that charade your eyebrows. msnbc, adam schiff went on morning show, lied through his teeth, he was asked, by intervideoer sam stein, have you heard from the whistleblower. >> we've not spoken directly with the whistleblower, we would like to, a lie. we have other things going on with this committee, they heard testimony of the former u.s. special envoy for ukraine

volcker, they have cherry picked his text-message, push them to media, media happily reporting them saying this proves this is a quid pro quo, the committee demand that schiff releases entire transcript, his testimony undermines nair thi narrative ta have budge been pushing out, am, the same democrat who want grand jury information with the mueller report will not give us deposition print is know vo envr kirk volcker, there are no excused. give the american people all the information. you see how different this is. from the clinton, from the nixon and the johnson proceedings, it totally different. now look at what i have here. transcripts of the phone call.

this is it. this is the transcript of the phone call. this is what the controversy is about. how did we get the transcript? the president released it. he did what? president released it. wow. any president release a transcript before, no, i heard it said where did they keep it? in a secon secured server, he wd to cover-up? this is one of their arguments. folks do you know president of united states could just say he is covering this by executive privilege, it would never see the light of day, not a court in america that would overturn his decision. given this is a discussion between one president to another president? doesn't matter if he had a secured server or not, he could have it under his mattress if he

wanted, he has constitutional authority to prevent this from getting out, he released it why did he release it, it is exonerating, remember the reports before? oh, my god he mentioned biden 8 to 9 times, he did not. oh, there is a quid pro quo, no there was not, remember that reporting? >> we'll take time and go through the two paragraphs that media are comingling to confuse you and confound you and lie you to to push impeachment. first let's look at this page, i am reading from the transcript. okay? president: i would like you to do u a favor, -- this is where they all get off, a favor, president said do me a favor. president said, i would like you to do us a favor. look into joe biden.

he did not say that get dirt on boyden? birthdabiden. nope, he said, i would like you to do us a favor, our country has been through a lot, ukraine knows a lot about it i would like you to find out what happened with whole situation with ukraine. they say, crowd strike, i guess you have a wealthy people, the server, they say ukraine has it. there are a lot of things that went owhole situation, i think you are surrounding your with some of the same people. i would like to have the attorney general call you or your people, and i would like to get to bottom of it you saw yesterday that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named robert mueller, -- but they say a lot started with ukraine. whatever you can do, it is important do you it, if possib possible. i would lik like to do us a fav, look into this issue of ukraine.

ukraine's involvement in our electtion. attorney general already investigatin that. this is a nothing statement. which is why the media, and adam schiff. had to lie about what the president said. they are trying too link the word favor with biden, there no link. they are trying to link word favor with military aassistances they are lying media as they have new russia collusion, falsehood, when we come back, i will read another section of actual transcript of know phonel to prove that the president of the united states did not say i want you to dig updater on biden or i am with holding aid from you, ukraine. we'll be right back.

(engines rev) the only thing better than horsepower... ...is more horsepower. (engines rev) if we were for everyone, we'd be for no one. with dodge power dollars, more power means more cash allowance. purchase now and get $10 per horsepower. that's $7,970 on the srt challenger hellcat redeye.

jill jill has entresto, and a na heart failure pill that helped keep people alive and out of the hospital. don't take entresto if pregnant; it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren or if you've had angioedema with an ace or arb. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ask your doctor about entresto. where to next?

>> from america's news headquarters. growing chaos in syria, this as white house orders all american troops out of the northern region. the defense secretary reporting 1,000 troops are leaving right now. at the same time turkey pressing forward with its offensive against kurdish fighters, syrian officials tell us one of turk

atax allowed hundred of isis prisoner to escape, not known if president trump intends to pull u.s. troops completely out of syria. >> hunter biden may be stepping down from board of director from a chinese backed private equity firm, his father joe biden said it was hunter biden's decision to do so. hunter business dealing in china and ukraine have become an issue in 2020 presidential race. >> now back to life, liberty and leflevin. >> welcome back. let's get back to the transcri transcript. phone call with president of ukraine, to other second they are site cites. >> president, good, i heard you had a prosecutor who was very good, he was shut down that is unfair, a lot of people are talking about, that the way they shut your good prosecutor down, by the way one of people was joe

biden on a video. you had bad people involved, mr. guliani is a highly respected man, he was mayor of new york city, a great mayor, i would like him to call you. i will ask him to call you with the attorney general. rudy very much knows what is happening he is a capable guy. you could speak to him that would be great. the former ambassador from united states, woman was bad news, people she was dealing with in the ukraine were bad news, so i just want to let you know, that other thing, oh, there a lot of talk about biden's son. that biden stopped prosecution. and a lot of people want to find out about that. so whatever you can do, with the attorney general, would be great. biden went around bragging he stop prosecution so if you could look into it, it sounds horrible to me. what in the world is wrong with that? everything that president talks about here is public.

joe biden bragged about stopping the prosecutor. president of the united states, raises it. and so the democrats and media say, he was trying to interfere with the election, to draw the ukraine into interfering with the election. how so? how so? joe biden did not do anything. what is the problem? drawing ukraine into the election, what this idea that if someone is running for office they wenthey -- can't be invest, he does not use word investigated, he does not say look into joe biden sh see if hs corrupt had. he said joe biden's son, and what he did, he is not demanding information there is no quid pro quo, there is nothing, i have a

question, why isn't the united states department of justice the public integrity section of criminal division, or united states attorney, investigating the bidens? >> i remember going over convincing our team, our -- others to convince the -- we should provide for loan guarantees, i went over i guess the 12, 13 time and i was supposed to announce there was another billion dollar loan guarantee, i got a commitment from , they would take action against state prosecutor they didn't, sa i said no i'm -- we'e not giving you the billion dollars, they said, have you no authority, you are not president, the president so i said call him. i am telling you, you are not getting the billion, i am leaving here, i think 6 hours, i said i am leaving in 6 hours, if

prosecuter is not fired you are not getting the money, son of a bitch, he got fired. >> why are they not investigating bidens? how is it hillary clinton can destroy thousands of e-mails questioned and joe biden on tape talking about blackmailing ukraine, and withholding money if they don't fire a prosecutor, a prosecutor who is investigating a krupp mone corry that is paying joe biden's son for god knows what, this does not do a damn thing to advance the cause of mutua impeachment. they go to their 6 second impeachment document had. the mueller report, wow, a claim by a whistleblower, thin we learned a few things, whistleblower has no first hand information, and a registered democrat, and the whistleblower has reached out or talked to a

2020 democrat who vupg for is rr president of united states, why do we need the whistleblower complaint when we have record of telephone discussion, how ar hoe you a whistleblower about something you never saw, we the people have the document. the raw evidence, why do we need it interpreted by a cia operative who in my view has gone rogue, a democrat, who has some kind of link to a democratic who is running for president in 2020. why do we need this? we don't. but the democrats do. the democrats need it. this is a joke. this is the document that was created to get around this document. as i will explain. ladies and gentlemen, don't forget, most week night you can catch me on levin tv, just give us a call, 844-levin-tv.

or. blaze tv.com/mark, we'll be right back. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. i wish i could shake your hand. granted. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ enterprise car sales and you'll take any trade-in?rom that's right! great! here you go... well, it does need to be a vehicle. but - i need this out of my house. (vo) with fair, transparent value for every trade-in... enterprise makes it easy. so much more than i could have imagined. my grandfather was born in a shack in pennsylvania, his father was a miner, they were immigrants from italy and somewhere along the way that man changed his name and transformed himself into a successful mid-century american man.

he had a whole life that i didn't know anything about. he was just my beloved grandpa. bring your family history to life like never before. get started for free at ancestry.com

bring your family history to life like never before. ♪ head in now for applebee's new pasta & grill combos starting at $9.99.

>> welcome back, here is the so-called whistleblower -- i never heard of a whistleblower, some debate over the form, the form was changed by the inspector general. just in time so secondhand information could be used. this really needs to be explored. i think this is a set up from beginning to end, i said last week on fox, no way this guy or gal whroat wroawrotegal wrote ts document has no first hand information, do you know what they do with a document like this in court, that, that is what they do, it has no value.

it is the original document that matters in court, it ought to be same with an impeachment. someone is not a whistleblower, not whistleblowing on anything we don't already know, using newspaper art articles, this is a farce, this is why democrats need this guy, whistleblower had a professional tie to a 2020 democratic candidate, in washington examiner by byron york: >> said he was a registered democrat, prior working relationship with a current 2020 democratic presidential candidate said a third person, what kind of inspector general is this? guy comes to you, he has second-hand information, none is first, he said, i am a democrat,

i have a connection with one or more of democrats running for president in 2020, honest to god, he said, okay you are a whistleblower? i have never seen anything like this before. form is suspect, he checked first hand information, he did not have first han information, there is more, no wonder that democrats to want to keep the gy in witness protection program or whatever basement he is in. from catherine herridge fox news, ig could not explain 18 day window between ukraine call and whistleblower complaint sources say. this so-called whistleblower waits 18 days. until he files his complaints. it is urgent, get it to congress, but waits 3 weeks? why? there are a lot of questions, breitbart.com, great piece, a small nonprofit helping lawyers. targets donald trump.

is heavily tied to far left activist organizations. and democratic politics, imagine that. i assume that something that people will want to look into as well. what else? we know this individual did not tell the inspector general he talked to adam schiff staffer, why not? because he wanted to be a whistleblower, adam schiff did not tell the republicans, that this so-called whistleblower had spoken to his stash staff. why? he believes in surprises that is all. but what are we talking about, let's get to the core, two president 2 spoke to each other on the phone. we have the secretary of state listening in, foreign minte minr of ukraine who also vouches for what his president said, ukraine foreign minister said there was

no pressure in trump's call with ukraine president, we have the transcript. no pressure. we have the ukraine president himself, zelensky, at u.n., i think you read everything, i am sorry i don't want to be involved in democratic open elect in usa, you heard we had a good phone call it was normal. we spoke about many things, i think you read it, that nobody pushed me. there was no pressure. ukraine president, again, what did he say? according to fox news, ukraine president said, no blackmail in phone call with trump, he told reporters his call with trump involved no bribe, no blackmail or quid pro quo, you have the two many witnesses, two presidents of the. who say there was no pressure, have you the original document. that shows, there is no

pressure, both presidents say no quid pro quo, and original document, that says no quid pro quo, but. you see we have the whistleblower. who knows nothing first hand. and the whistleblower says different. and his lawyers, the they say different, and democrats want it to be different, then this, fox news john sol mone salomon. shows ukraine officials had opened a new probe in to firm linked to hunter biden months before president trump's phone call with the country leader, salomon said that u.s. government knew ukraine was planning to look into activities of the holdings and an energy company that employees then vice president joe biden son as member of board, u.s. government opened source intelligence was aware as february 2019 ukraine government was planning to reopen the burisma investigation, this is long before the president ever

imagined having a call with president zelensky. he noted this is a significant shift in the fact of the timeline, salomon said that information he obtained including documents, was omitted from u.s. intelligence community whistleblower complaint lodged again president trump. wow. one other thing. this is from the daily caller. ukraine government reportedly did not know that president donald trump froze military aid until a month after the phone call from -- how can you have a quid pro quo when they don't know you are withholding money, it does not show up in transcript, no link. how do you have a qu e. o . to withhold aid until ukraine agreed to investigate former

vice president joe biden. detail was reported in "new york times" but witness unnoticed until after release of july 25 call transcript, and whistle-blower complain, times originally dropped news this piece of information in 13th paragraph of a story about the aid freeze, like their coverage of holocaust, they dropped things in 13 paragraph. what jews in europe were being exterminated, no question about it read chapper chapter 6 in m, you have join me most week nights levin tv, 844-levin-tv or internet, blazetv.com/mark. we would love to have you, we'll be right back. my digestive system used to make me feel sluggish

but now, i take metamucil every day. it traps and removes the waste that weighs me down, so i feel lighter. try metamucil, and begin to feel what lighter feels like. mom you've got to [ get yourself a new car.g ] i wish i could save faster. you're making good choices. you'll get there. ♪ were you going to tell me about this? i know i can't afford to go. i still have this car so you can afford to go. i am so proud of you. thanks. principal. we can help you plan for that. start today at principal.com.

>> welcome back, this is special life, liberty andl levin, the house gone rogue. i want to remind you a little bit about ring leader, nancy pelosi. >> access to initial public stock offers, opportunity to buy a new stock at insider prices as

it guess on market, they can be lucrative, and hard to get. >> if you were a senator steve, i gave you 10,000 cash, one or both of us will go to jail. but if i am a corporate executive and you are a senator i give you ipo shares in stock, over course of one day, that stock nets 100,000 dollars. this is legal,. >> in former house speaker nancy pelosi and her husband participates in .8 ipo one in 2008 from visa just as troublesome piece of legislation that would have hurt credit card companies it. two days later it of trading at 64, the legislation never made it to the floor of the house. pelosi also declined our request

for a interview, but agree to call it news conference. >> i want to ask you why you and your husband in march 2008, accepted and participated in a very large ipo deal from visa. in a time that there was major legislation affecting credit card companies making its way through the house? would you consider that a cop pliaconflict of interest. >> i don't know the point of your question? is there a point to make glim >> do you think it is all right for a speaker to accept a preferential stock deal. you participated in ipo. the time you are speaker of house, you don't believe this was a conflict of interest. >> it has the appearance, if you decide you elaborate on a false

premise, it not true, that is that. >> i don't understand what part is not true. >> that i would act upon an investigation. >> she pointed out that tough legislation passed, but two years later and initiated in senate. >> in terms of funding credit card companies a speaker of house or member of congress, up against anyone. >> corporate executive members of the executive branch, all federal judges are subject to strict conflict of interest rules but not the people who write the laws. >> there are laws and rules that limit this, i want to remind you about ring leader and members of congress. that they are flesh and blood and imperfect people, not long ago "me too" move. , they cut deals with taxpayer dollar to silence individuals who accuse them of sexual

harassment, yeah. we told up the house of representatives, and democrats who control it. like noble, like they are judges, like they are great jurors. when in fact, they are politicians. what they are doing is very problematic. and they keep attacking the president of united states, this president, if we look at subpoenas issued, his taxes have been subpoenaed accounting firm record, and accountant, and bank records, all their financial records. those of his children have been subpoenaed, we've never seen anything like this in american history, constant attempt to tear down this president, i see, some people say, well, congress has an oversight responsibility, ladies and gentlemen, congress has to have a legitimate oversight responsibility that

applies to article i duty. this is been going on since day one. with democrats in house, in democrats in media. we'll be right back. no. in the basement. why can't we just get in the running car? are you crazy? let's hide behind the chainsaws. smart. yeah. ok. if you're in a horror movie, you make poor decisions. it's what you do. this was a good idea. shhhh. i'm being quiet. you're breathing on me! if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. let's go to the cemetery! (engines rev) the only thing better than horsepower... ...is more horsepower. (engines rev)

if we were for everyone, we'd be for no one. with dodge power dollars, more power means more cash allowance. purchase now and get $10 per horsepower. that's $7,970 on the srt challenger hellcat redeye. they're america's bpursuing life-changing cures. in a country that fosters innovation here, they find breakthroughs... like a way to fight cancer by arming a patient's own t-cells... because it's not just about the next breakthrough... it's all the ones after that.

set yourself free with fleet. gentle constipation relief in minutes. little fleet. big relief. try it. feel it. feel that fleet feeling.

>> welcome back, isn't it interesting not a single committee in congress investigated hunter biden or joe biden with respect to ukraine or china. why hunter biden of paid, and joe biden interceded on his behalf, told ukraine government that prosecutor needs to be fired. a plane ride on air force 2 with his china, and financial relationship resulting from that, they are investigating donald trump. it is like russia matter, only one that colluded with russia is

hillary clinton. and trump did not collude with ukraine. and as i said, where is the congressional oversight that everyone talks about, they talk about interference with foreign government, three u.s. senator may 4, 2018, robert menendez, patrick leahy, richard du rich s is how they talks to a foreign government. -- they are juicing the ukraine to assist mueller to take out trump. that is what they are doing. did any individual from trump administration or anyone acting to its behalf encourage ukraine government or law enforcement

officials to not cooperate with the investigation. mueller probe raised in anyway? three democrat senators, nobody sniezsneezes over there, anothe, chris murphy from connecticut, all over tv attacking president of united states, he threatened ukraine if hugh dare to open an investigation on joe biden, you know, support you get is bipartisan. well you know what? that kind of a threat took support you get to bipartisan. you dare to investigate joe biden. meanwhile joe biden should be investigated. his son should be investigated. and he called for impeachment of president of united states the other day. now he wants in essence democrat party in house to use impeachment clause and house of representative to advance his campaign. by trying to take out the president of united states had. oh, you top talk about interference, there is

interference. all right, folks thank you for joining me, on life liberty and left uplevin, i'll see you next. reporter: new york city in the 1980ss looked different from what we know today. downtown in the crammed with luxury apartment buildings and restaurants served as a stomping ground for illicit activities including drug dealers and prostitutes. a crime rate engulfed the city.