laura ingraham is up next. she's also in the swamp. we'll see you back here tomorrow. ♪ ♪ >> laura: i am laura ingraham and this is "the ingraham angle" with a pack show from washington tonight. three congressmen instrumental in the republican effort against impeachment. they're all here to respond to my angle and preview their next move for it plus, this is my favorite story of the entire weekend. mid romney has a secret twitter account and he uses it to take aim at fellow republicans and defend himself. what is really going on here? one of the targets of these twitter tirades, former speaker newt gingrich is here to respond. plus, as democrats look to build impeachment around abuse of

power, legal power player alan dershowitz explains how many actions the former president obama would fit the bill. first, the deep state department. that is the focus of tonight's angle. since the day trump got elected, members of the faceless and unelected bureaucracy began conspiring to nullify the will of the voters. while some are truly silver's arrest when their job by advancing the president's policy agenda, others are doing everything in their power to de. this makes them on civil servants. they were enraged. not only that trump was from outside their elite global circles, he had the nerve to promise to drain that there swamp. politically motivated and they threw a policy roadblock, blew up bridges, and operated like undercover saboteurs.

they've been leaking, obstructing, and resisting all the way home. for that of course they earn unending respect from trump's political and media adversaries. >> this whistle-blower who i want to say is a patriot. speak with the whistle-blower and particularly this whistle-blower is a hero. >> overcome by brave people by fiona hill coming forward. the ambassador. >> she is setting an example of courage and integrity under great pressure. >> laura: the crowning glory came this weekend from the editorial writers of "the new york times" per check this out. "president trump is right. the deep state is alive and well, but it's not the sinister antidemocratic cabal of his fever dreams. their aim was not to bring down mr. trump on a personal or political animists, but to rescue the republic from his

excesses." oh please. "the new york times" fundamentally apprehends the relationship between the president and the republic. it's up to the electorate, not a band of disgruntled career government employees to determine if they want to be rescued. if the suppose it excesses go up to mr. neighbors, okay they should demonstrate that, convincingly. a member of the bureaucracy didn't campaign for your vote, they didn't travel the country to make its case, no one voted for the bureaucracy. the unelected paper pushers in d.c., they know better than a 63 million americans who voted for donald trump and his agenda. i don't think so. they constitution may give the sole veto power to the president, but the permanent resistance at the deep state department and the intel agencies believe that they have veto over you. the latest travesty involves

butter and diplomats and national security officials who are defying state department's lawful orders not to testify. what the executive branch believes as an illegitimate impeachment inquiry. >> this has been unfair, we have officers going up there to testify about important security related matters without a state department lawyer in the room. we are not being prepared -- allowed to know what it says. adam schiff ought to be embarrassed by the kangaroo court he is running. >> laura: the president's top diplomat is both against protocol and a direct violation of their sworn duty. it was there land of the deep state state department folks all along. according to politico, hill staffers have indicated they have subpoenaed the diplomats to give them some cover. they could cooperate, it's not that simple. we will get to that later with our legal panel. should the white house immediately go to federal court to defend against these subpoenas? yes, the legal panel will get

into that too. who are these deep state, state department types heading into the hill to testify? first we have veteran career diplomat mckinley who resigned after 37 years at the state department. he is now higher the renowned, never trumper john belanger to represent him. then there state department official george kent, fiona hill, both of whom were concerned about giuliani's investigation into the bidens, although apparently their testimony was also in part favorable to the president. again, when you have to rely on leaks, everything is behind closed doors. this whole thing is corrosive. the big kona was the former ukraine ambassador, she was an obama holdover and removed from her post a few months ago after concerns that she was not supportive of trump's agenda. heaven forbid you can remove someone in the executive

department who is not supporting the president's agenda. according to giuliana, he is the one who fired victor show again and said he kept him coming from the u.s. getting a visa to come here and give his side of the story. he is the prosecutor, biden bragged about getting fired. he did it on camera last year. he was allegedly investigating the ukrainian energy giant. remember that made energy neo flight, hunter a small fortune. that is all conspiracy stuff, right? lindsey graham doesn't think so. >> i would like to call the prosecutor and united states and have them testify bait is it odd that the only person that biden wanted fired was the one investigating? >> laura: marie didn't want him to come? i wonder why. that is odd as lindsey graham said and the oddities don't end there. bill taylor the man who replaced him in ukraine will testify

before impeachment hungry house democrats tomorrow. taylor is also being represented by the anti-trump lawyer john belanger. you see the pattern here. his testimony is already being hyped by the media. >> bill taylor is the star witness of the week as you mentioned. he is the guy, the fm infamous t chain, you would have to be crazy to do that. >> he widely trusted in the state department, foreign policy circles. it's going to be a pivotal moment to hear from him. >> laura: the medias line is asian of these individuals were more cooperative with this democratic chamber than they were -- everywhere with the president and his policy, it's hilarious. they want you, the american public to believe the president now is in real trouble this time. they're all turning on him. the media is creating another false narrative in order to move

public opinion. the credibility of the state department witnesses is unimpeachable. >> i can't vote to keep this guy in office. that's their strategy. >> there are no deep state strong men. they are all members of the executive branch. >> with the mueller report, he wasn't leaking. it was donald trump and his henchmen right out there. they were leading the messaging on the mueller report and here it's different. the democrats have been really good with the messaging on this. following the facts. nancy pelosi has done a credible job. >> laura: nancy. this is media cover for what most certainly are deep state actors who mean and always meant to stop trump's policies and around the presidency. these national bureaucrats are incensed that this president dared to upset the failed agendas that they have been spending their entire career advancing. remember, a lot of the same

types of experts at foreign policy establish who brought us the iron deal, benghazi, the iraq war and other foreign policy and intel's groups over the past decade. how can i forget the gross negligence with the rise of china. no big deal there. the fact that these people are opposing the president should give us all confidence that he is doing the right thing. when you drain the swamp you will have to beat back a lot of swap monsters along the way. that's the "angle." joining me now, our three powerful congressmen. lee zeldin, house and committee member chris stewart, house judiciary member andy biggs. let's start with you. what are public it's on the hill going to do about the democrats clearly colluding with these deep state civil servants to undermine trump? >> there has to be full accountability. this evening andy biggs at a

resolution. all the democrats has president trump talked about stick together. forget about what adam schiff does wrong. the president can recall an ambassador for any reason at any time. there is no because that's required. the policies that are getting enacted by the state department aren't for these individual members to decide on their own what is right and wrong one it's a policy. it is not the right decision? the president withdraws but that's the play call. with regards to ukraine it's a law. it is law that in order to provide aid to ukraine, ukraine has to be making significant progress. >> laura: didn't obama himself claimed to push that? wasn't that the same agenda that obama had? corrupt countries should get an unbending flow of cash. it is not what they're supposed to do? >> that was his suppose that agenda. this president actually did it. you said a couple of things that i would like to emphasize if i could because they are

important. you said some of the state department officials are good people doing their work and they are. i travel with them and i know them. many of them are offended by this. >> laura: why don't they go up to capitol hill? >> i talk to an fbi agent this morning and he came up to thank me. he said we are embarrassed by some of our department. >> laura: let's focus on the state department. i worked for the reagan administration. i'm dating myself, i don't care bread that was undermining reagan's agenda. one of my producers said, as i can academic circle. the world can sing in perfect harmony at the state department. it can't. it's a different breed of person. not to say there's anything wrong with that. there is a different breed of person. you failed, you failed, let's do a different thing. >> no doubt about it. these people are talking about their hurt feelings and try to protect their colleagues. put yourself in front of a military drill sergeant and still how your feelings get hurt. he did say one thing that i

think has to be emphasized. they don't just work for the president, they work for the people of the united states. the people selected this president. they not be trying the president. president. they are betraying the people. they are betraying the trust of the constitution which has sustained for more than two years. we made a mistake. >> laura: it's a condescending, elite view that the people who voted for trump, they believe were stupid. they probably have too many kids and drive around into many gas guzzlers. they shop at walmart. those of the tape of people they look down and they've always looked down. as congressman zeldin mentioned, they killed us resolution with adam schiff for fabricating what he said. that july 25th call and pretending it was a parody. after the vote there was some grumbling. congressman beggs, one of your colleagues said you should have referred this to the ethics

committee instead of two this built for centura. what about that? >> i happen to know there is an ethics referral that's out there for mr. adam schiff. that is a closed-door thing. the american people need to know we are fighting for the president. that is what we are doing. >> laura: feta stronger. it's in-your-face and the president needs to see that the american people need to see it and to and the republicans need to see it. that's why we went the way we did. >> laura: the president spoke out at his cabinet meeting today and was directing it, probably not to this panel, but the weak kneed republicans. watch. >> the republicans have to get tougher. we have some great fighters, but they have to get tougher. the democrats are trying to hurt the republican party for the election. >> laura: they said the president as being his own press secretary, he sometimes i think feels that democrats never

break rank. they just never break rank. republicans are like -- they jump, john. they're jumping off the cliff. >> call it up for what it is. adam schiff is cherry picking and withholding facts. let the american people know that. when the president from the nixon hearings in the clinton hearings are not being followed, the minority party can have subpoena power. this is lacking legitimacy, credibility, and fairness. when you do an interview on one of those other channels and they're asking about what the president did, be on offense and be strong. the president is right in wanting to fight back on corruption. joe biden, hunter biden, they shouldn't be exempt from scrutiny because joe biden is running for president. look at how much money you're biden was getting paid. look at joe biden. he was literally the most unqualified, conflicted person out from that administration. offense and know the facts.

when the media is trying to spend what reality is. >> laura: we are playing chess on their playing hit you in the face with a hammer. that's what they're doing. your democratic colleagues said, a process has been fair and there will be some open hearings in this process and defended the process vigorously tonight. >> it's nonsense. if you consider this fair, it's like mr. stalin. show me the crank. let me illustrate that, they started out saying, they don't have open hearings. first thing they did, they held it in open and it was a disaster. there was nothing in that that. for their impeachment. they will hold close sessions but release the transcript. they did that with volker and it was equally disastrous. if there was anything in this hearing would commence the american people that this president should be impeached, i promise you there would be holding an open hearing. >> laura: is no true that what

happens in these hearings is that the folks will go in, sometimes in violation of the order of the state department for the executive branch, saying no. they do it anyway. a lot of what they say or in large part is pretty favorable to trump. they will be one thing, but that is the obnoxious nature of a secret proceeding. >> that is exactly right. you get to cherry pick what you want. that's a huge problem. >> laura: they say were complaining about process because you don't have the facts on your side. >> the reality is when you close the doors you are saying, we don't trust anybody but us to get to the truth. they are actually -- the word came out they're not going to let these guys -- members of the committee get access. that is how objectionable this is. that is how close this is going to be. >> laura: what?

what are they doing that for? why are they doing that? >> they want to be able to prepare their report and they don't want us to be able to get the rest of the information out. this is an a level playing field. we can call witnesses who we want to call and to your point about cherry picking, michael mckinley. the news was talking about how he resigned in protest. he was transcribed interview, i can share it. he was going to resign anyway. adam schiff asked a leading question about how they state department was getting worse under mike pompeo mike pompeo. mckinley had to recast -- that was the word he used. he talked about how great the state department has gotten. supportive of mike pompeo. their strategy is very clear. they're going to do it in secret and leak and live. they're not even taking entire sentences. in some cases they're taking pieces of a sentence, pieces of a text at every single day we

are going to hear this, the media -- and leads to the media and the next report is the opposite. >> laura: i want to do this again because we talk about this every night which was a transcript of the call. this will be one of their articles and we'll get into that. this is what he says. a key part of the beginning after they talk about the aide. "i'm very grateful because the united states is doing a lot a lot for ukraine and were ready to buy more javelins for defense purposes. i'd like you to do us a favor because our country is bad and a lot and ukraine is about it. i would like you to find out what the holt situation. they say a lot of things went on. i think you are surrounding yourself with the same people. propelled by the attorney general to call you." later on he mentions rudy giuliani and joe biden, the key thing here which a lot of people don't want to talk about. it is crop strike which was this

outfit that did the examination of the dnc servers. he wants to know, what is that we didn't get to the bottom of this? that's what he first talked about. it is not legitimate for him to say that? it goes to the presidential election. >> he is talking about the 2016 election. it's convenient for them. >> laura: where is the quid pro quo? >> there was no pressure or demand. they did know there was a hold on aid. they didn't find out. weeks later as when they brought it up to volker after a political story. what happened after that? there was no new investigation. the kind of a quid pro quo -- >> laura: i think you saw what happens. the that these facts get conveniently swept under the rug by a compliant press. he knows this guy can find out about it. if we had an actual press corps that looked into legitimate

questions, both sides, republican and democrats. we don't have that. >> they have proven to be the least curious people in the universe. they're unwilling to ask some of these basic questions. >> laura: oh, my goodness. we could have gotten a bounty hunter to find hunter biden. thank you so much. great to have you all. coming up, "the ingraham angle" investigates a couple of the president's republican detractors. is there some personal stake in francis rooney's resistance? mitt romney's secret online activities exposed. he even targeted our next guest, newt gingrich is here to respond. ♪

♪ >> i'm very mindful of the fact that after watergate everybody said it's a witch hunt to get next them. turns out it wasn't a wink job.

>> you're not ruling out the possibility that this was an impeachable offense? >> i don't think you can rule anything out until you know all the facts. >> laura: .t teaser made francis rooney the new darling of the liberal media. it isn't just the bogus quid pro quo narrative. the florida congressman considers trump's pullback in syria and impeachable offense as well. what a goofball. now rooney isn't the only republican angry over what trump did with syria. what would provoke him specifically to threaten or at least elevate impeachment over a move that could trigger military footprint abroad? "the ingraham angle" did some digging and found that the florida congressman used to be the ceo of rooney's holding inc., a family owned business. the company provides general buildings and construction services which seems pretty innocent until you look deeper and you find that his former company has been awarded nearly

$1 million by the defense department since 2008. mostly through a subsidiary, manhattan construction group. his family business was also his single biggest campaign contributor since his election in 2016. look, only he knows the real reason why he has become this impeachment booster over the president's foreign policy decision. voters to have a right to know. republican senator met romney was exposed for using a secret twitter account to attack g.o.p. leaders. the freshman utah senator was using the name "pierre" to not only take shots and real conservatives, but to defend himself as well. joining me now is newt gingrich, former speaker of the house, fox news contributor, author of the new book. "trump versus china." the media is calling this the

"liberation of mitt romney." [laughs] how do you see it? >> i don't think that he has been in jail, so i don't know what he's being liberated from. he's a freespendin freestanding. i think they probably have many reasons not to be happy with each other in style and tone and the way they approach things. in the end i have a hunch that romney will be careful about all of this and i would be surprised if he didn't in the end of the vote against conviction if, in fact, it does come to the senate. he is a different person. he ran for the president several times and he was a governor. i think -- >> laura: you are being so easy on romney. >> i'm not being easy. >> laura: yeah you are. >> at some point you have to relax and say, the whole point of our constitutional structure is that senators are the

president. the president isn't a senator. neither of them are house members that i don't mind if an occasional senator wanders off and doesn't fit a party orthodox. he is one of those people. he has to live with his own conscience. i think he doesn't have much influence in the senate. i think we sometimes exaggerate all this stuff. >> laura: his floor speech on syria was a bit dramatic. let's watch part of it. >> what we have done to the kurds will stand as a bloodstain in the annals of american history. are we so weak and adapt diplomatically, that turkey forced the hand of united states of america? turkey? >> laura: this as a man who wanted to be secretary of state of course. >> first of all, that's a fairly ignorant topic about turkey. turkey is a very large country with a large military. we have our major air base in

turkey and anybody who suggesting that you can shrug off turkey does not understand anything about the power structure of the middle east. again, romney represents -- >> laura: this is what i'm getting at but you are newt gingrich. you know more than i do. you are newt gingrich. maybe it's a simple take. he represents the state that voted huge for donald trump. the approval among republicans of the president and his overall record is still about 94%. all of these people who love to blow their own horn and have their moments and they get all the accolades, the liberation of met romney. this is like a common occurrence and it's the old, established order in the republican party on their last death rattle frankly. it's only -- my deal is it's

only helping the left. it's not helping some greater cause of constitutional democracy or republic. it's about mid romney. i think it's about met romney and ingratiating himself with all of the right people on the left. i think it's about met >> may be you and i disagree in part because as a historian i think this is how revolutions occur. schmidt, commit romney represents the old order. guess what? he just gave you an old order speech. watch that surprise anyone? >> laura: with a fake twitter account. he is attacking you, attacking other people and ray tweeting comments about you. he is a grown man. i supported him running for president in 2008. i supported him. >> may be i am generous to a fault, but the truth is i don't pay attention to him. i don't think he matters in the long run of american political history. he certainly doesn't matter in a

donald trump republican party. i think he is a fossilized element of a party that is disappearing. >> laura: that's what i'm talking about. that's what i was waiting for. >> doesn't offend me. he is being true to himself. that is fine. >> laura: i guess it was a different mitt romney that want to a secretary of state parent >> i'm not going to go off and try to psychoanalyze him. we were competitors we have enough scars on both sides. as a historian you are correct to say, whether it was paul ryan met romney were a handful of other people, they're the old order edits and order which is disappearing. >> laura: fairly quickly. what people are saying where a couple of unforced errors out of the white house over the last few days. first there was the press conference with mick mulvaney,

some imprecise language on the issue of why president trump had that phone call. what was motivating the phone call. yesterday another comment on chris wallace's show where he again kind of stepped on it and said the president is in the hospitality business. exactly what we don't want to hear. what are your thoughts on that? you've been out of the public arena for so long. >> first of all, you never go on a show like that unless you're practiced and you know what you're going to say. if you don't deviate from what you're going to say. you don't get in a running fight with somebody who's smart as chris wallace. it never works. i would recommend them if you want to see how to do wit right, secretary pompeo on stephanopoulos. he had figured out his boundaries and he stayed right inside him. he did not let him bait him. it's a case study in how a person like reagan would have

handled that interview. i think that mick mulvaney would do well to look at that approach and to take a much more disciplined approach to what he is doing. on the other hand i have to tell you. as you know, we share a packer stock and this week for the first of many hundred year history of the packers paid aaron rodgers had a perfect game. there's a lot to learn from not throwing interceptions and fumbling the white house could slow down a little bit. give us a couple weeks of error-free ball. >> laura: fortunately we didn't have that. you can't make those errors when the left is completely together and united. they never prank ranks. republicans are all on their own on occasion and it's frustrating to the president. thank you so much and pick up his new book. "trump versus china." it's out tomorrow. one of the most important

battles that our country will ever face. whether the capital knows it or not. up next, alan dershowitz and johnny you are here and moments to blow holes and the democrats knew messaging on impeachment. why their abuse of power strategy might reveal their weakness.

>> laura: there is increasing concern about the effectiveness of mick mulvaney. that includes trump's inner circle. bloomberg reporting that his closest associates are creating a "list of potential mick mulvaney replacements." in his last two public appearances, give clues as to why. there was that ill-fated press conference last thursday where he made this extraordinary cla claim. >> he also mentioned to me, the dnc server, absolutely. no question. that is it and why we held up the money parent >> a quid pro

quo? >> we do that all the time with foreign policy. >> laura: days later following a walk back, he made this blunder. >> at the end of the day he still considers himself to be in the hospitality business and he saw an opportunity to take the biggest leaders from around the world and put on the best show. the best visit that he possibly could and he was very comfortable doing that and i think we're all surprised with the level of pushback. >> laura: that is the point. in this environment you cannot be surprised by the reaction to something like that or the pushback and you can say the president is of the hospitality business because he's not. joining me now, alan dershowitz, author of the new book "defending israel" and the former deputy assistant general. as impeachment heats up, what are your thoughts about the current dynamic in the white house?

does the president need a different structure given these missteps by spa mulvane? i'm sure he's a nice person, but these were pretty big blunders. what can be put in place? >> in the godfather movie, when the godfather -- the opponents come after the godfather's family and he says, we need to have a wartime conciliatory. we need to have a wartime governor, a wartime chief of staff. i'm afraid after watching mr. mulvane's performance, that is what trump has to do. he has to gear up for it impeachment war that will go on for months and he needs to have a white house that is purely and singularly focused on winning that battle. it's not going to be politics as normal. presidents who have been under investigation in the past like reagan, clinton, they all took this step. it's a key step. in order to would make this fight with the democrats.

>> laura: this is a tough environment and if you don't appear in the press almost on a daily basis or don't have the facility of language frankly that people sometimes naturally have. president trump can go on and bulldoze his way through. he does a good job of it. you can be rusty, or you can be glib and you can be careless. right now in this environment you cannot be. >> i agree with that. the president needs two groups of people. one to fight the daily battles and make sure there are no missteps, but then he need somebody to present the big picture. in life and in politics there missteps and political symptoms. there are crimes and there are impeachable offenses. the president much constantly make it clear that we haven't come close to the fourth category of impeachable offens offenses. argue about political sins, those are good reasons.

federal crimes, that's my expertise. nobody has committed any federal crimes and impeachable offenses. somebody within the white house has to keep focusing on the big picture. the president has not committed any impeachable offenses and congress is not above the law. if congress does not have the power to impeach a president unless he commits treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors period. >> laura: i want to get you what you just spoke up and i need you both to react to this. i want to put up two full screens that really delineate what is the emerging democratic strategy on impeachment. what articles of impeachment could be offered? abuse of power. here's what they're looking at. removal of the u.s. ambassador, the use of giuliani as an intermediary in the phone call that's the first one.

let's focus on that. hold that screen. we are talking about abuse of power. to fire an ambassador who doesn't support your agenda, that's an abuse of power. you can't have your own people in place? >> these are not abuses of power. these don't come close to high crimes and misdemeanors. i agree on that. the president has the constitutional authority to remove any ambassador at any time, for any reason, or for no reason. the president doesn't even have to give a reason. the constitution -- this goes to the second point, the constitution gives the president the authority to conduct the foreign relations the united states has set for foreign policy. he has the power to remove any official who serves under him in the executive branch. who does or do not help them in that policy. that's the only way he can control ambassadors is through that to fire him for the last point you raised, the

communications with ukraine and ukrainian president. the problem is the constitution recognizes a president must have the ability to protect the secrecy of his communications with other countries. the problem is that i worry about, democrats are making impeachment a regular tool to find out policy disputes. the congress will place the president under his thumb. >> laura: just because they don't like the president. >> that's exactly what he said during the great debate about impeachment. they rejected the concept saying that would make the president answerable to congress the way the british prime minister is answerable. >> laura: i'm sorry to interrupt. i want to put up this obstruction of justice article of impeachment as well. there sat in the white house counsel's letter to congress. this is a reporting that's coming out. the order that certain officials not testify in the impeachment inquiry.

that is what nancy pelosi is looking at. this is the reporting at nbc is showing tonight. >> obviously that's not an obstruction of justice. this is part of the president's authority. he can invoke executive privilege, not just for current members of the administration, but for previous, retired members. as long as he is invoking for what happened in office. the latter is a letter that i think any reasonable lawyer would have written. we are not cooperating! i've done this a hundred times when i represented people. we are not cooperating. you want to make us cooperate, go to court. the treasurer of our constitution. congress doesn't have the ultimate word. congress has to go to work. the judiciary will ultimately decide these conflicts between the executive branch and the legislative branch and our system of checks and balances. we are not in a constitutional crisis. >> laura: they have to force

congress has handed to court. they have to do that. the administration must force their hand and stay firm on this cooperation issue. >> i agree. the letter of the white house sent was the right step. make congress issue a subpoena. may congress sue the president and he can say, i don't recognize the legitimacy. i haven't taken a vote on it. how do i know you are conducting an impeachment inquiry. i defer, i think the court would say, we are not going to get involved. >> i think you will get involved but not in a lot of instances. i think they may split the difference. at least all three branches of government will be operating and it won't be just congress. >> laura: thank you so much. i had come as off the wall as the speech was, alexandria ocasio-cortez and the endorsement of bernie sanders revealed the true i.d. of the democratic party. the one poll that has every

democrat worried. jon mcglocklin. ♪

♪ >> we need to build a mass movement in america. everybody has a right to health care! everybody has a right to an education! the future and our future is in public system and that is publicly owned system. we need to take power over our lives again! >> laura: and other words, to become more free she is saying you must give more of your power to the government.

neato. jon mcglocklin, trump 2020 campaign poster. the media is obsessed with his narrative of elizabeth warren and buttigieg. 25,000 people turned out for the lab's most radical over the weekend. >> that is right. the socialist had a gathering. the only thing history knows -- has shown us is that socialism guarantees a quality of poverty for the people. that is what socialism delivers and i couldn't help but notice, they held that rally outside of the largest public housing project. wouldn't it be nice if it was smaller and the private sector was bigger? that is what america is built upon and that's the opposite of what she stands for. >> laura: this is where wood seems like all the juice is in the democratic party. then music. they had speeches. they got everyone laughing and

screaming and cheering. we see socialist regimes crumbling, causes leading to riots. we sell would have been to chile over the weekend. some saying, is that our future? the yellow best movement in paris. it's all crumbling and yet they're embracing this idea of that power to the people, but power to the government. for the government to owned businesses. >> senator sanders isn't going to cuba or some other country where they have socialism. he has to take care of his heart condition. he is fortunate to stay inside the united states. they should fire their people. that rally was held a stone throw away from the good paying jobs when they drove amazon out of new york city. $27 billion in revenues that would have gone for things like schools, public safety, health care, et cetera. for somebody like senator sanders who moved out of

brooklyn decades ago and aoc who actually grew up in westchester. not from the bronx. they don't have a clue what they're doing. in the meantime they're talking about taking power from the rest of us. >> laura: that's power! if you believe the government having more power means you will have a better life, that's the crazy thing i've ever heard. the staff cells and they have attractive spokespeople. a new poll from "the new york times" finds voters in the six battleground states that trump carried in 2016, posed from moving trump from office, a 53-47 margin. bridges that were democrats? is that why they have to keep this going in secret and whipping up the troops and the comparisons to nixon and clinton? you hear it over and over again. >> i think the democrats have lost irrationality. there are so to impeach the

president. things of that nature are not going to stop them from doing it. the train has left the station. you will get impeached in the house and he will not get convicted and the senate and will a voice to the nation's time once again. the real problem here is you can't say that the president has violated the norms and your response is to do that yourself. you can have a secret impeachment and this country. you can't carry out these hearings with witnesses that the public can't see. this is what is so unfair about this process. let the people decide. >> laura: let the people decide and that's true power to the people. let them vote. up next, a special announcement when we come back.

>> laura: get those. justin trudeau who just weeks ago was mired in black face wore brown face controversy will remain prime minister after tonight's canadian election. with the minority government.

being a liberal means having having to say you're sorry. you get reelected in the process. tune in tomorrow night, i will have an exclusive set down with vice president mike pence. we are hearing he will become the major force in this impeachment fight. shannon bream has all the details. >> shannon: visit only monday? >> laura: it seems like thursday. great show. >> shannon: would begin with a fox news alert. the president weighing on from everything from ukraine, fisa abuse. the fms anti-trump dossier, also iran and the strategy. highlights are just ahead. also tonight, breaking house democrats locking a resolution to censure congressman adam schiff. the measure backed by republicans him to chastise the intel chairman for making up a parody of the president's call with his counterpart and reading it during a congressional