>> sean: smear, slander mismanagement, pretty much a normal day in washington. pathetic. that's all the time we have left, a lot more tomorrow night. we will never be the media mob that hate-trump media did let not your heart be troubled laura ingraham, you and i apparently weren't invited to the pompeo event. everyone else on air was invited to the pompeo event. did you get an invitation? because i didn't get an invitation. >> laura: i have a question: what event? that's how bad it is for me, i don't know what you're talking about. >> sean: oh, you're going to the event with the secretary of state? nope. no invitation for hannity. >> laura: hannity, first of all, we have to work for a living, number one. number two, before we talk about that, i have to say congratulations, you wiped the floor with the competition. not a big surprise, but still you wipe to the floor with the competition, october -- >> sean: and so did you. >> laura: you are number one on top.

>> sean: it's the tightest prime time lineup in all of cable, and we say to our audience, thank you. you make this happen. >> laura: and we actually like each other, contrary to what people think. >> sean: over the years at fox, that has not always been the case. just saying. >> laura: hannity is my slightly big brother. you had a great show tonight. >> sean: your way of saying i am older than you. it's my 24 year here! i get it, i'm a grandpa. >> laura: you are the young man. hannity, awesome show tonight. >> sean: happy anniversary for "the ingraham angle." >> laura: thank you, two years. can you believe it? i have driven all the right people nuts, causing controversy every night of the week. that's my goal. >> sean: i've to bail you and tucker out every night. >> laura: have a great night. i'm laura ingraham, this is "the ingraham angle" from washington tonight, and what is really going on behind closed doors on capitol hill?

in moments, congressman devin nunes, lee zeldin, and bradley byrne are here to expose pelosi and schiff's impeachment parlor games, and tell us what we need to know about what witnesses are really saying what they are not saying. also tonight, i have a question: is the democrat impeachment spectacle essentially a prebuttal meant to block horowitz investigation? plus, it's time for "seen and unseen" with raymond arroyo. the biden hispanic outage that wasn't, kanye west contradicts the narrative with jesus, while john legend rewrites a christmas chestnut for the #metoo generation. but first, republican voters are watching, that's the focus of tonight's "angle." in last night's "angle," i urged senate leadership to step up and oppose the democrats partisan impeachment hunt, and it seems

like mitch mcconnell may have gotten the message. >> the country cannot afford for democrats in congress to take a one year vacation. from any productive legislation. just because they would rather obsess over impeachment. the process seems to be treating chairman schiff as though he were a de facto special prosecutor. >> laura: well, he is completely right, of course, now is the time for republicans to stand together and defend the from any productive legislation. just because they would rather leader of their party against the smears. it now, it would be one thing if there was any of underlying crime. there is not. not in the transcript, and not in the secret witness testimony that dems have selectively leaked. nor was there any corrupt intent on the part of the president, as he sought information on possible ukrainian corruption leading up to the 2016 election. remember, the president knew that that call with zelensky was being heard and documented by more than a dozen people.

so anyone with actual intent to violate a u.s. law would be a tad more discrete, don't you think? this autumnal farce should never be allowed to roll into a winter show trial. indeed, as noted last night allowing a long, dragged out process in the senate would merely validate and perpetuate the fraud begun in the house. naturally, republican senators are being bombarded by never-trumpers and democrat there take a principled stand against the white house, protect your party's future, stand against trump. >> five or ten years from now people will ask each of us what we did in this moment. they will ask us what we did when confronted with this crisis. >> laura: spare us. the crisis is of the democrats's own making, and it's up to republicans to ensure that this never happens to any president of either party again.

so tonight, i offer some further reminders to the g.o.p. senate as it awaits whatever articles of phony impeachment come from senator schiffless. first, there is no g.o.p. in 2020 without trump. should you abandon him on the grounds ginned up by adam schiff, you will not only not grow the party, you will lose everything. historically, fighting against a president from your own party in an impeachment battle doesn't offer any political benefit. it merely ensures the political dominance of the opposition. second, g.o.p. senators need to spend less time agonizing over the daily impeachment drama and more time advancing and championing trump's proven record of success. as the economies of europe and south america and china are slowing, ours is still the envy of the world.

>> maybe we have a better president than you do. >> laura: who says he doesn't have a sense of humor? not only rising wages and almost 500,000 manufacturing jobs added data, but a record number of judicial confirmations. and new trade deals renegotiated like the usmca, the democrats are spitefully refusing to pass despite pleas from labor farmers, and even the president of mexico. republicans need to get off the defensive and stay on the offensive. demand action by the house that actually helps working families. remind voters that the democrats' real motivation behind impeachment is rage and hatred and vengeance. an impeachment travesty is the democrats' only deliverable at this time.

their cooked up, endlessly hyped impeachment narrative is all they have to cling to. think about it, and democrat-run cities and states, what do they have to show for themselves? well, americans seek chaos criminality, and ruin. the far left runs california's state government, and it has been a disaster. wildfires are fought with rolling blackouts. the homeless epidemic. a public health crisis from the spread of new diseases. a growing drug culture. sanctuary city lawlessness. people are fleeing the state. and you have a good picture of life if elizabeth warren wins the white house. that's pretty much it. liberals took over new york city, a place now hemorrhaging citizens. with crime on the rise. and their homeless situation in new york city is so out of control do-gooder de blasio pays to export the homeless to your hometown.

chicago -- we love chicago, it's hardly any better, ditto for baltimore and st. louis. republicans should be giving voters there a sober warning. and also hope, these are beautiful american cities, tell the people there you have tried the democrat party, try to democrat rule. why not try something different? as a trump would say, what do you have to lose? the democratic party today exists solely to oppose and bludgeon donald trump. as far as i can tell, it has little other purpose. but his agenda is actually working, and the democrats don't even try to propose a better way forward. not really. their only message is we don't like him. >> trump is the most corrupt president in the history of his country. >> this president poses a mortal danger to our fellow americans. >> push him out of the white house. >> he's an idiot. >> laura: and finally, my third point to senate republicans. remember who sent you to washington. republican voters

overwhelmingly -- 95% -- approve of the president's job performance. and they don't expect any republicans will try to short-circuit the right to vote for him again. the partisan impeachment of an american president who had no criminal intent, who committed no crime, must not be validated -- or even, frankly taken seriously by the senate. any republican hemming or hawing or playing a role in this saga with the media will essentially provide cover for the unconscionable perversion of the extraordinary power of impeachment. republicans stood united remember, during the attempted takedown of brett kavanaugh, and they succeeded in getting him confirmed. republicans didn't buckle during the mueller hysteria. so learn the lesson, support the

president now, against these baseless charges, or you will face the wrath of voters tomorrow. and that the "angle." joining me now, congressman devin nunes, ranking member of the house intel committee. congressman lee zeldin of the house foreign affairs committees. and congressman bryne, house armed services committee member. let's start with you, this is obviously in the hands of the senate because you just don't have the majority in the house to stop this. are you concerned that some senate republicans aren't with -- most overwhelming majority republicans nationwide thinking this is a farce? >> other than pierre delecto romney, i don't think there's any others. >> laura: murkowski. >> i think were going to be okay. the facts just aren't there. we go to the basement every day and things leak out, and it's a bit like watching a cult. it's become a cult.

we were talking earlier, this is your two year anniversary. happy anniversary. i was here for your very first show. >> laura: that's right. >> and we are talking about the very same things we talked about two years ago, and so many millions of americans minds are poisoned. there is a cult going on in the basement, in a skiffou go outside, 50 feet outside the doors, and you see another cult and that's the media. they are down there every day 14 hours a day, and at times, it will swell to like, 100 people in the mainstream media. and they are just waiting for the marching orders that the democrats -- yeah, they pass the narrative, and that's what we deal with every day. it's been this way -- >> laura: the republicans are complaining about process, they are not going to complain about substance because the underlying conduct is so bad. of course, there is no criminal provision violated, no quid pro quo. steny hoyer, i want to play this for congressman zeldin. he made a comment today that basically contradicts the provision that jerry nadler made. let's watch.

>> there is going to be due process, it's going to be fair. there will be a form in which the president is given the opportunity to call witnesses to cross-examine, to have his representatives present, and i am surprised that the republicans say they are not going to vote for a resolution that, in effect, gives them what they asked for. >> laura: but the resolutions as the president can't ask questions, or may be denied the ability to ask questions if certain documents aren't turned over to the committee. what's the truth here? >> it's going to be a total show. it doesn't guarantee the minority party can call misses doesn't guarantee the transcripts will be released via the president can't have council president to present evidence to be able to cross-examine witnesses. this is going to be another missed opportunity for an illegitimate charade, a circus that lacks credibility fairness, transparency. so illicit. you're losing the process argument.

you want a substance argument? bring it on, adam schiff because we know that ukraine didn't even ask about a hold on aid until august9th, that was released shortly thereafter. you know what, the united states of america had to get off ukraine in order to release the hold on aid? nothing! >> laura: the opinions of people listening in on the conversation -- at the president knew were listening, those opinions of a transcript we already have are supposed to run into -- up to impeachment of the president of united states? is that the low bar we are setting, congressman? >> there is no substance here. i'm not in the room with them. i read the leaks, i have seen what is in the transcript, the president of the united states and the president of ukraine has said. there is no there there. >> laura: that oppressive people with impressive backgrounds marching up to capitol hill, and they are impressive figures, and they say you have patriotic people concerned about the integrity of its government, and they brought

their concerns to their superiors. >> but they're offering nothing new, nothing that is relevant to this. the leak we had today was from a woman that didn't like the fact that she got calls from lobbyists about the investor to ukraine. so what? >> laura: the president can replace any ambassador he wants to replace. it's called bringing in your own people. so they don't like it congressman nunes, when a president like trump gets to appoint his own people, because why? the deep state at the state department wants to run the show. they are elected people, trump is just along for the ride. >> for all the people who claim they are experts in this town okay, geniuses, it's amazing the common theme -- of course, we can't talk about whatever individual said, but this is a common theme. they have total amnesia about what ukraine did to trump as a candidate. they seem to have forgotten, for example, that the ukrainian

ambassador here in washington bashed trump as a candidate. >> laura: just so people understand what congressman nunes is talking about, this is some of the amnesia by the publication "politico". there are reporting today that lieutenant colonel vindman testified that a long time nunes staffer with no ukrainian expertise was the -- that he had interfered with the 2016 election on behalf of democrats. but in january of 2017, they said the opposite over at "politico," they said ukrainian efforts to sabotage trump backfired. kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president after quietly working to boost clinton. oops, "politico." >> i didn't know you are going

to put that on here. >> laura: it's the second anniversary, wanted to celebrate with you. >> they have no substance. this is the second staff person my current or former staff, that the mainstream media has been maliciously attacking for a weeks, every day is a new convert is a theory pretty know why they don't like kash patel? because he was the lead investigator that totally annihilated schiff and democrats in the entire russia hoax. the good part about this is he is a patriot. he is a counterterrorism specialist. >> laura: you can only be called a patriot if you are resisting trump. >> it's even better. guys like me, i have a problem proving defamation because i have to beat "the new york times." kash patel does not. >> laura: you better find a lawyer and start pursuing this. congressman zeldin, there is a lot of chatter in this town of how this will destroy the republicans in 2020, how the

american people are all for impeachment, removal of this president. it's a narrative driven by what exactly? what's driving it? >> an enraged liberal base. they've lost their minds. when the president's hand was on the bible getting sworn into office, they were lining the streets of pennsylvania avenue with sign that said "impeach him now." at "politico" story you named had other lies, one naming me one with john ratcliffe. 0% accurate, 3% accurate -- i can't wait for the transcript to be released, and i hope they are, because the rest of the story, their narrative falls apart. >> the only truth to the stories, we were down in the basement. we happened to be there. after that, it's all false. >> laura: they have been smearing you for two years, and we know why. you are onto them from from the very beginning, and everything you did is fabulous. congressman bryne, you heard my thoughts on the process.

nancy pelosi said today it is going to be quick and narrowly focused. i'm not sure what that means. is it going to be quid pro quo doesn't exist, or obstruction? we don't know. to the senate, let's say you give them advice yourself, to mitch mcconnell. what would it be? >> if they think they have to take this up, they have to make sure it is a tight proceeding over there, don't let the democrats go wild with it. that is what they're doing with these guys. forcing them to come forward and show us bribery, treason, high crime, misdemeanor. they don't have -- >> laura: 30 seconds. i would say case dismissed. this is a complete and utter abdication of constitutional responsibility. >> they don't have it, and force them to show what they haven't been able to to this point.

i'm not on the committee, but they won't even let me read the transcript. >> here in the house, he is the judge, jury, prosecutor, chief strategist for lying and leaking, yesterday he was getting into witness coaching and wasn't very good at it. over the senate, he's just some dude. senator mcconnell -- >> laura: they have an enormous want to power up your democrats know how to use their power, and they use it like a sledgehammer against republicans. it's time republicans stood up i think mcconnell is a crafty old dog, he will do it. thank you guys for being here. congressman nunes, can think of a better person to be on the show. >> two years. >> laura: thank you all so much. coming up, is the impeachment strategy a prebuttal? we will have some revealing answers and moments.

♪ ♪ >> laura: it's becoming clear to the left that they are about to be exposed, big time. this impeachment spectacle is

almost like their prebuttal to the durham investigation, and the deep staters are starting to sweat for obvious reasons. joining me now is ken starr former whitewater independent counsel, fox news contributor and kim strassel "wall street journal" editorial board member, and author of "resistance at all cost." ken, this is how comey responded when he was asked about the durham investigation. >> i'm not worried about a single thing with connection to any of the matters under investigation. i'm confident that when the american people see the picture of why we did what we did, their confidence in the institution will be maintained, restored and protected. >> laura:: ken, pretty cool as a cucumber kind of deal from comey beard are you buying that? >> well, he sounds very confident, but here's a problem

with that self-confidence. we have heard from the attorney general of the united states, bill barr, who is upright, total honesty, that not only is this a criminal investigation now, but great progress, and what we also know as michael horowitz, the inspector general, is on top of his game, and i think, between the two of them, these very great, professional people, who everyone respects, we are going to know a whole lot. so i would say no one should be too confidentf in light of the series investigations. >> laura: kim strassel, the efforts to malign the character of bill barr and john durham two people who ken said -- i mean, their background, their integrity, service to country it's just really unimpeachable. but again, if you are even objective toward this administration, you are venal. if you're supporting the administration, forget it, you are never going to be called a patriot.

what about that?ar does that start to wear thin with the american public? >> look, the attacks on them, i think it is a measure of the fear, the fear of what is coming, because what you are seeing -- and it has been somewhat overshadowed by impeachment, there's been this relentless, now almost daily delegitimization campaign, and i say to you, it's one thing to level that at bill barr, andto that he is a political figure. i don't think it's right or correct, he's been very straight up in that job.up but what is really detestable are the attacks if you are seeing on john durham, and even inspector general michael horowitz. i mean, jerry nadler and adam schiff came out and essentially accused durham of serving as a lapdog to the attorney general. this is a guy who served his country most of his adult professional life, taking on the mafia, into theif cia, he desers a lot better than that. i think those kind of things are shocking, and should be shocking to americans, that they are willing to even go to that

level. and by the way, these are the same people who also lectured us all week that you cannot say anything questioning the integrity of the people and the government officials who are appearing in front of their committee. >> laura: they are sainted if they resist trump. they are saints. if you resist trump, you are a saint, no questions asked. you can neveris raise a questio. with tomorrow's big vote,he i wt to move on to the rules the democrats laid out yesterday. they seem rigged, okay? nadler has the discretion to deny the president and his counsel the ability to call or question witnesses, or otherwise impose appropriate remedies if the administration refuses to make witnesses available for testimony or fails to produce documents to any house investigating committee. which part of that screams fair process? >> they have moved a little bit in terms of the public nature of these events, that's long overdue. but when you analyze what powers the republicans have, it really is at the discretion of adam schiff, and i think there is another colossal blunder by the speaker of the house, who

has empowered adam schiff. first of all, he's not the chair of the house judiciary committee, but leave that aside. here is fundamental problem, and contrast to peter rodino, nixon henry hyde, republican, clinton those two impeachments, on both sides of the aisle, people said we have a chair of the committee who is fundamentally fair and fundamentally a good person, who loves his country.. they are great stories. very briefly, after peter rodino voted in favor of impeachment of richard nixon, he retired to his private chambers and cried like a baby be because he loves the country. we are so far removed b from th. >> laura: here is something else the dems wrote in the document for themselves but the provision gives nadlerng leave o punish trump for any stonewalling of the impeachment

investigation. if trump doesn't turn over his tax returns to the ways and means committee, or financial records to the services panel rather can use his discretion to deny him and his counsel access to impeachment proceedings. >> and by the way, let's point out, too, that everythingee proceeds as it is proceeding now until it gets the judiciary committee. which means that schiff is allowed to continue operating in secret, and the white house remains blackballed from the entire procedure during the entire part of the time that schiff is collecting evidence he is going to put into a report. they don't even get to interact until it moves over to the judiciary committee, when this is already pretty much a done deal. but then yes, you are right they included this club in there, for which jerry nadlerck can use it to try to say you comply with every subpoena, no matter what it does to executive privilege. >> laura: really quickly, how

should the white house respond to this request for a member of the white house counsel's office, meaning the nsc council under the umbrella of the white housesc counsel, and anotr white house counsel official slightly lower level officialnc how do you respond to thatli request, if you're the white house? >> i would resist. executive privilege and attorney-client privilege, these are sacrosanct. the president can wait them if he so chooses, but this is intruding into the heart of the presidency, presidential decision-making, and my guidance would be resist. let's take it to court. that's why we have the article three judiciary. >> laura: so force them to take the administration to court, correct? t >> that's what i would recommend. the other side as you are going to be held in contempt, or that will be added to the articles of impeachment, but i think the right thing to do for the sake of the presidency is to resist. >> laura: all right. ken and kim, thank you so much great to see both of you. speaking of impeachment and the democrats' process, are pollster also to blame for driving the impeachment narrative?

are they part of the narrative to gin up support for impeachment? case in point, this is the "usa today" suffolk poll. 46% believing trump should be ulimpeached and removed from office, but then when you break it allth down, the findings looa bit shakier than what the resistance crowd believes. 36% believe the house should impeached trump. 22% believe they should continue the inquiry, but not impeached. 37% believe they should drop the investigation. joining me not to analyze is john mclaughlin, trump 2020 campaign poster. john, what do the numbers tell us? the headline is always couched to look the worst for this president. >> they are arguing and framing the impeachment -- the media bias is framing it for the democrats, and you are exactly right. the republicans in the senate should step up and cut this off right now. because tomorrow, there is a sham resolution being proposed by pelosi in the house

precisely because they are reacting to the numbers. we had a poll that we put out last thursday where 52 to 36% among likely voters, they said this is a political, not a legal impeachment. only one-third thinks it has to do with illegal. 47 to 33%, the voters said the president shouldn't comply with this because it is being held in secret and he doesn't have due process. and 59% of all voters said this is a waste of time, and congress needs to start solving the nation's problems. and "the washington post" the next day attacked us for the worst impeachment poll ever because their poll when they put it out last time, they had to be republicans, toooo many democra. >> laura: the devil is always in the detail, the sampling and wording of questions, but they aree snapshots. john, byron york, he made an interesting point yesterday, and he writes that the poll reveals americans hold complex views of the trump impeachment. democrats are hoping now that televised hearings will convince

americans that the president must be impeached. wording of questions, but they are snapshots. john, byron york, he made an's what about that? should the democrats think long and hard about the televised aspect? it's great for the media, but isn't necessarily great for them? >> no, but this is a railroad. and the senators -- 50 senators got on a resolution, saying this whole process was wrong. and the republicans should do it againut tomorrow. the senate should get together and say mcconnell and graham should leave them and end this process right now, because it in secret, it partisan -- >> laura: it's not an impeachment that i wouldn't even recognize -- i would say, you know, we're going back to the work of the american people. this has been a sham from the beginning. there is no underlying crime of criminal intent. there is certainly a lot of leaking coming out of the committee, and not fair access to republicans.

we don't even recognize it. it would be kind of bold to do that, but what are they going to do, take them to court? okay, the court would say it's a political question and we are not voting on it. >> republican senators should do this, because they are doing this precisely to stop the president getting reelected. everyone sees biden collapsing. they see the democrats going up the edge of the earth. >> laura: and you see the poll about elizabeth warren, the head to but elizabeth warren versus trump, trump is up a few points. he gets pummeled relentlessly and is still up a few points. it'sdet a national poll, not ste by state is more revealing and useful, but look, biden is still up on trump in these polls. none of this means anything now. they are using it to try to scare republicans into opposingm the president. i don't think it is going to work. john, thank you very much for being here tonight. and coming up, the newest biden blunder, and a christmas tune gets a pc rewrite. raymond arroyo "seen and unseen," next. rewrit. if you have medicare, listen up.

the medicare enrollment deadline is only weeks away.

with so many changes, do you know if your plan is still the right fit? having the wrong plan may cost you thousands of dollars out of pocket. and that's why i love healthmarkets, your insurance marketplace. with their new fitscore, they compare thousands of plans from national insurance companies to find the right medicare plan that fits you. call or visit health markets to find your fitscore today. in minutes, you can find out if your current plan is the right fit or if there's another one that can get you extra coverage or help save you money. best of all, their service is completely free. does your plan have $0 copays, $0 deductibles, and $0 premiums? if not, maybe it's not the right fit. does it include dental and vision coverage? well, if not, maybe it's not the right fit. how about hearing aids, glasses, and gym memberships at no additional cost? maybe there's a better fit for you. call healthmarkets now or visit healthmarkets.com for your free fitscore we can instantly compare thousands of medicare plans

with all of these benefits and more, including plans that may let you keep your doctor and save money. with the annual medicare enrollment deadline coming, don't waste another minute not knowing if you have the right medicare fit. for this free service, go to healthmarkets.com or call right now. having helped enroll people in millions of policies with an a plus customer satisfaction rating, you can trust healthmarkets. don't assume that your plan is still the right fit. the health markets fitscore makes it easy to find the right medicare plan for you. healthmarkets doesn't just work for one insurance company. they work to help you and they do it all for free. ♪ your insurance market place, healthmarkets ♪ there may be medicare benefits and savings you're missing out on only healthmarkets has the free fitscore call the number on your screen before the deadline call healthmarkets now

>> laura: it's time for our "seen and unseen" segment, we expose the big cultural stories of the day. biden blunder's blunder's kanye west spreads the gospel and john legend is ruining a classic song for joining us with all of the details as raymond arroyo, fox news contributor. happy anniversary. >> raymond: happy anniversary to you. >> laura: joe biden just keeps stepping on it. what has he done this time? >> raymond: this biden blunder is the story of negligence that frankly should frighten a lot of people in the biden camp. now, as a hispanic, i listened closely when biden announced last week, to great fanfare, a new campaign outreach to latino voters. >> we need the leadership of the latino community. your voices and your votes -- >> raymond:th then he announced this social media rollout. >> laura: that looks nice. >> raymond: by the time he made the announcement, the trump campaign had already bought the domain, the facebook, and the twitter handle, always a bad

idea, laura. b>> laura: i thought it was kind of cute. >> raymond: the trump campaign has rebranded it come at it now reads "whoops, joe forgot the latino." >> laura: oh, no. >> raymond: features all kinds of interesting stuff. >> laura: some choice biden clips, and takes you directly to hispanics for trump. this is one of those games those whac-a-mole games. >> raymond: biden was asked about the outreach on saturday at a town hall, and he mentioned a democrat not running, then confused races. watch. >> i'm the only campaign that i'm aware of, maybe the other campaign is doing it, i'm not sure, castro's campaign is doing it. we have reached out extensively into the african -- the

hispanic, latino community. >> raymond: he's had such a rough time, laura. he's slipping in the latest polls, denied communion by a priest over his abortion advocacy, and when a black woman asked him if she were his daughter, what would his advice be to her if she were pulled over by the cops, and he said this. >> if you are my daughter, you'd be a caucasian girl, and you wouldn't be pulled over. >> laura: the audience probably like that. >> raymond: the confusion. i didn't realize until today, he :has had two brain aneurysms. he's just not sharp. he's slipping in the polls. >> laura: i've always had a soft spot for biden. he is their best hope to beat trump. >> raymond: kanye west took a major change in his career, a gospel album, "jesus is king," and claims a new understanding of life and politics. >> democrats had us voting democrats and food stamps for years, bro. what you talking about? guns in the '80s, plan b lowering our votes, making us

aboard our children, getting as skilled >> raymond: making us support aboard our children it's explosive, and it matters much more than what politicians say, or the hearings this week. this is a huge rap icon suddenly talking about god, and the most traditional things. even to his wife kim kardashian-west. >> you are my wife. i just went through this transition, being a rapper looking at all these girls looking at my wife, like oh, my girl needs to be just like the other girls, showing her body showing this, showing that, and i didn't realize that was affecting my soul and my spirit or someone who is married and in love, and the father of about to be four kids. >> laura: who is that guy? >> raymond: he's preaching modesty. >> laura: remember on radio when he went after taylor swift? we hit him hard, and that is when she was -- somewhat conservative, we thought. not conservative, politically.

and he was kind of rushing in to take her glory. >> raymond: now it's a very different to them. and finally come i've written a whole piece of this on foxnews.com to your pal, john legend. o >> laura: love him. >> raymond: has decided the o winter time diddy, "baby it's cold outside" -- it wasn't pc enough. so he has #metooed the lyrics. here's the original. ♪ ♪ baby, it's bad out there >> raymond: contemporaries here a date rape song, that he slipped something into her drink. it was written in 1944. so legend has updated it. here are the new lyrics, laura.r reads this way. go ahead. >> laura: "my mother --au what will my friends think? >> raymond: i think they should rejoice -- >> laura: if i had one more drink -- >> raymond: it's your body and your? choice."

it's clumsy, offur meter, and it defies the thrust of the characters. it's a romantic song, a flirt they destroyed the lyrics. write your own. >> laura: he had a little brush up -- a brushoff of kanye at the mark twain awards. i went there, and he had a brushoff. he's into gospel now, brushed him off. all right, raymond, thank you. the piece on pc christmas, it's at foxnews.com. up next, michelle obama's outrageous statement about americans, and -- dan bongino and chris hahn debate, next. ♪ whether you're out here on lte.

or here on a wifi hotspot. xfinity mobile has more coverage to keep you connected to what matters most. that's because it's the only wireless network that automatically connects you to millions of secure wifi hotspots and the best lte everywhere else. switch now and see how you could save up to $400 a year. and get 50% off when you buy any new lg phone. xfinity mobile. click, call or visit a store today. ♪ >> laura: tonight, we are exposing democrats double

standards on top issues in what we are calling "rules for the but not for me." joining me now is dan bongino fox news contributor, author of the book "exonerated," along with chris hahn, former aide to senator chuck schumer and host of the progressive podcast. i want to begin with comments made by michelle obama last night in chicago. w we played her husband's correct assessment of the cancel culture, but what we didn't show you is this claim by his wife. >> as we moved in, white folks moved out. because they were afraid of what our families represented. i want to remind white folks that y'all were running from us. and still running. >> laura: meanwhile, as folks pointed out on social mediath today, her family's most recent purchase, about $15 million mega-mansion sprayed on martha's vineyard. that doesn't sound like a bastion for -- but her comments came at the same event that i

think barack obama showed again, why no one touches him in the democrat party. he manages to make things sound cool, everyone calm down, it's going to be okay, but very interesting contrast there.. >> yeah. his comments about cancel culture were great, i just wish he wouldn't have tried to cancel the trump presidency the other spygate thing, then it would have been just peachy. but the problem with michelle t obama's comments are they are so ridiculous and absurd. we are all dumber for having heard them. listen, laura, i have the unique experience of having been a secret service agent for the obamas, and i will say in advance, personally, they were very kind to me, i i have no interest in disparaging them personally and i never will. but for them to say people were running from them, laura, we had to beat people away from the obamas. people love -- no one was running from the obamas. i get what chris is probably going to say, she's making a more generic comment about the black community in general, and while i don't deny there areic specific, isolated cases of

racism in america, i don't deny that no one should -- claiming somehow that white people en masse are fleeing from blacks in america in modern day -- it's one of the dumbest things i have ever heard in my life. i've lived in new york maryland, and florida, diverse states, and i've never seen any nonsense like this at all. >> laura: people are fleeing however, they are fleeing cities that aren't run very well. i have friends in chicago who despise trump, but they're like i'm done with the teacher strike. our kids are out of school for 11 days, pulling their hair out. people in l.a., honestly upset about some of the problems there. what about the fleeing. narrative? how does that sound accurate?? >> the first part of her statement was talking about a history that is very well document, the white flight out of the cities, and even some suburban areas. i think if you look at the way

developments happen acrossun ths country today, you see resistance in suburban communities to any project that they think might organize their neighborhood, and that is just -- >> laura: where is that? thee '50s and '60s, with white flight. tr 60 minutes did a great job some years ago, the new migration is from major northeastern cities. i'm from connecticut, so hartford, that's where i grew up. the flight out of new englandre terrible management of these cities. chicago, people going down south, going to south carolina north carolina, tennessee georgia -- they are going to places they think are run better. that's the narrative. it's not a racial narrative. >> there are people moving for all sorts of reasons, and what michelle obama said is not untrue. there are people who will move away -- not all people, not everyone, but there are people who will move because they are concerned that their community -- >> laura: there are bad people, and there are racist

people, and there always will be, sadly, because we live in a flaw society. let's move on to elizabeth warren. here she is touting, i guess her $800 billion education plan at a rally on saturday. watch. >> is opportunity going to be reserved increasingly for those born into privilege? or are we going to be a country of opportunity? opportunity so that every kid in america has the opportunity to get a first rate education. >> laura: privilege. i think she believes public schools should benefit students not the financial ideological interests of wealthy patrons like the devos and walton families. she's going to ban charter schools, and she made this pledge, more ironic, the fact that she reportedly sent her own son to an elite private school. she can send her kids wherever she wants, but if you want to hang with the public school -- i

went to public school. send your kids to the public school. i guess try to improve them that way. >> yeah, elizabeth warren is the biggest fraud in the race right now. she sent her kids to a wealthy public school there there are 22,000 public high schools in the country, 2,000 of them responsible for half the dropout.ry just 2,000 gate if you happen to be black, you have a 50% chance of sending your kids to one of those dropout factories. i wonder how liz, with her kids -- and by the way, i applaud elizabeth warren, nice job sending her child to a great school. i don't knock her for it, i just wish she wasn't such a fake phony fraud, like every other liberal out there who wants to lock a parent out of sending their kid to a good school. i'm sure chris will have some nonsense about trading money for public schools. >> i know it's easy for you to mark her and call her a hypocrite than to come up with a plan -- >> she's's a fraud. >> she's got a plan. she has adopted the naacp's plan, and i think you should read the plan before you marker and call her a fraud, because you clearly haven't. it's easy for you to say she's a hypocrite because she sent her son somewhere, but you don't

respect capitalism, dan, and that is your problem. >> you don't respect personal dignity. chris, seriously, go out -- >> laura: guys, we've got to go. this is a fun second anniversary to partly spend with you guys. she also got slammed by "the new york times" this week which was a little interesting for defending corporations in court. she is anticorporate, but so interesting stuff, we will see what happens. dan and chris, thank you. coming up, a big announcement about the past and future of this show. stay there. future

.. not even our competitor's best battery

can match the power of energizer. because energizer ultimate lithium is the longest lasting aa battery in the world. [confetti cannon popping] energizer. backed by science. matched by no one. >> laura: all the time we have >> all the time we have tonight but it is our second anniversary. shannon bream's second anniversary. we are happy we are still here

and kicking. there's a story behind these earrings. i'm not telling it. the entire walking nationals and houston astros can eat this cake. we have more shows coming in a lot more work to do. it has been a lot of fun. we have us all celebrating tonight. thanks for making this a possible. if not for you we would not be doing it, we annoy all the right people every night, you know who you are. shannon bream and the fox news at 19 take it from here. shannon: happy to share it with you and we thank everyone supporting us for two years. we begin with a fox news alert. we take you inside the special forces raid the killed world's most wanted terrorist minute by minute. tonight the head of us central command, they will try to retaliate for the killing of their leader.