Skip to main content

tv   The Ingraham Angle  FOX News  November 4, 2019 7:00pm-8:00pm PST

7:00 pm
recipients outraged. they want to reverse that rule. until then, he has had to be recognized at the white house sometime this week. we will never be the lying media mob, we will always seek the truth. thank you for being with us. let not your heart be troubled. he or she has spared trouble. you're going to get into trouble tonight. >> laura: i think the dog who is adorable is going to be fine either way. whether he gets a purple heart, i think the dog is good. >> sean: that was on fox & friends. they had a purple heart recipient giving his purple heart to the dog. the president needs to give them both one. change the rules. >> laura: the dog is fine. you had a great show. we will pick up where you left off with john solomon. this has been 21 from a very busy washington. the stars are out on monday night. lindsey graham is here and he
7:01 pm
will tell us how the g.o.p. intends to attack this impeachment fights. alan dershowitz will explain why two white house lawyers refused to appear in front of congress today show it's game on. trauma 2020 senior campaign advisor laura tromp. she's never been on the shell before, hard to believe. she has a new reaction to a battleground poll that has democrats and panic mode. john solomon has exclusive new reporting and he will bring it to us tonight concerning hunter biden and pressure that ukrainian -- ukrainian company put on the obama state department. first, president pragmatic versus democrat fanatic. that is the focus of tonight single-parent last week we saw democrats finally vote on that m investigation they had been pursuing in secret for weeks. this impeachment inquiry -- think about it. it would knock the wind out of
7:02 pm
any other president, but not him. in fact the dramatic effects of their cheesy impeachment prequel was blunted days before the boat when trump announced a successful and daring admission to take out the isis leader. then it was six days later, the week ended with blockbuster economic numbers. >> 128,000 jobs in october, beating expectations. >> black unemployment rate is at a historic low at 5.4%. >> this is potentially game changing. >> laura: today the stock market committing the 401(k) and tensions kept climbing, heading records across all industries. even pockets of pop culture seems to be coming around. for years the president has gotten the stiff arm from a lot of celebrity athletes, but today
7:03 pm
when he hosted the world series champions the washington nationals, it was all smiles. >> kurt suzuki. [applause] >> i love you all. >> i did know that was going to happen. >> thank you for keeping everyone safe and keeping america the greatest country in the world. >> four more years. >> laura: leftists wore they would never cheer for the nats again, all over social media. i'm sure the team is crushed to hear that. as all this good news is piling up, what are the democrats up to? >> we expect the witnesses to have been subpoenaed to come and this after to be no-shows. this will only further add to the body of evidence on a potential obstruction of congress charge against the president. >> laura: speaking as a former
7:04 pm
white-collar criminal defense attorney, this is insane. a president exercising his right to invoke executive privilege is now tantamount to obstruction? it will end up in an article of impeachment? what a joke, but it is a question a federal court, perhaps the highest court may ultimately have to decide. the democrats tunnel vision on impeachment has them in the dark about the way regular people feel about all of this. the latest "new york times" poll showed the top two rising democrat candidate bernie sanders and elizabeth warren are losing to trump and most swing states. who could have guessed that middle america wouldn't be thrilled to pieces with a show celeste from vermont or iphone native american who pretend she is not a socialist? i have to say at least bernie sanders is backing him up -- all the best endorsements.
7:05 pm
>> we must build a mass movement of the working class that transcends faith, age, gender and background. that is the only way we are going to defeat donald trump. >> i'm beyond honored and excited for a president who will fight against western imperialism. >> laura: was she reading a dog-eared old copy of howard zinn's people of history? what does she do in her free time? what country has tromp tried to occupy her? she is truly the gift that keeps on giving so i don't want to give her any advice. smart democrat leaders do see the danger is lurking here for the party. >> this idea of purity and you're never compromised and you're always politically woke and all that. you should get over that quickly. the world is messy. there are ambiguities.
7:06 pm
>> laura: we have all those imperialists running around. i'm sure the hit squad when they listen to what obama said wasn't all that amused, but nancy pelosi seem to advance has point on friday. she said, what works in san francisco does not necessarily work in michigan. remember, november, you must win the electoral college. i'm kind of thinking this is too little, too late on her part. giving the fanatic so much running room and propping up their credibility may have been her greatest political blunder ever. she should have seen this train wreck coming. meanwhile the candidate was the best chance of beating trump in the swing states is the lamest horse in the primaries. joe biden is now in fourth place in iowa and third in new hampshire. maybe that is because he seems to live in a constant state of
7:07 pm
self-contradiction. >> i did not know he was on the board of that company. >> your dad said i hope you know what you are doing. >> i said, i do. >> laura: which is it? this takes us back to this inescapable reality. while the parties energy is clearly with the left-wing radicals, their message doesn't connect in the swing state. this is new york magazines big magazine latest anxiety filled deadline. fill it out. there was this attempt at a wake-up call from an old liberal, former san francisco mayor willie brown. he wrote of the goal was to damage president tromp by formalizing the impeachment inquiry, its mission accomplished, unaccomplished. if anything v-belt solidifies his hold on power. come next year he will have an impeachment victory and quite possibly a solid economy. the democrats will have, what?
7:08 pm
back in january folks kind of thought it was odd when i said in another angle that i took alexandra across the el cortez seriously. it wasn't that i agreed with her views, but that i saw her quickly becoming the leader of the party. the democrats have gone in the direction i predicted and it is slowly but surely backfiring on them. liberals, there forever accusing us republicans of selling are sold to trump. how many times we read that tired old line? that is plainly false. trump and the g.o.p. on a variety of issues have compromised. issue is like a number of troops that should be deployed overseas. trade deals that at one point he want to do out of like nafta. the woman who sold her soul is the woman with the gavel. she cannot go to her voters next november and brag about all of
7:09 pm
her accomplishments because she will have none. impeachment isn't going to do anything to make america's lives better and she knows that spirit passing the usmca, prescription drugs, infrastructure, that would have but she refuses to do it. this frantic rush to satisfy the people on the left, to impeach trump has only empower the crazy and it swamped any other agenda they could have had or platform. wait a second, bernie didn't interrupt each years. i thought they were all against that chant. of course that feigned outrage on their part when trump folks chanted that about hillary. it was another lie. all in all, this week was a very good one for our pragmatic president. no water trump was in a good
7:10 pm
mood in kentucky. >> today a record 158 million americans are now employed, the highest level of employment in our country's history. we have added nearly 10,000 new factories. we slashed the record number of job killing regulations. we ended the war on american energy. we are the largest producer of energy anywhere in the world. >> laura: a year from now voters will choose between that stellar record, peace and prosperity for a record of dysfunction and demonization on the part of the democrats. it's going to be a very easy choice. that's the ankle. here now to respond as alan dershowitz, harvard law professor and the author of the upcoming book, "guilt by association." senior fellow at the claremont institute. the president and look worried
7:11 pm
about impeachment at tonight's rally, but is there anything now with the posture of this case as it moves forward in this inquiry. is there anything he should be worried about? >> first thank you and the name of my book is "guilt by accusation." it's about being falsely accused and having the accusation becoming the determination of guilt. i don't think the president has much to worry about. they're focusing on obstruction of congress and there is no such thing. it's not a crime. obstruction of justice might be crime, but obstruction of congress is called checks and balances. that's called separation of powers. when congress tells her you have to do something and you think the executive authority tells you can't do it, you go to court. if the court decides you have to do it, then obviously if you fail to comply with the order of the highest court after all
7:12 pm
review is done, you are obstructing. to refuse to comply with a congressional subpoena when there is a plausible claim of executive privilege is simply an exercise in checks and balances and good for the constitution. >> laura: john ethan, this is a question we have been talking about for a few weeks as it became clear that when the white house said no, were not going to allow a member of the white houses counsel to testify. there was another individual. they were going to go after them for obstruction. they're trotting out a lot of more liberal, legal scholars like michael gerhardt at usc who assess tonight, there is no provision on the constitution that protects anyone, including the president or anyone in the executive branch from disclosing criminal activities. the president's efforts to impede are really an attack on the house. your reaction to that tonight? >> first of all we don't have any evidence of any criminal
7:13 pm
conduct and normally the prosecution or investigation of criminal conduct doesn't get done by a partisan political branch. we don't remotely have that here. third, the president and his advisors and conduct of foreign affairs and the internal communication and advice from his advisors, particularly in the counsel's office. those are things clearly protected by executive privilege and the notion that congress can demand people to release will reveal the president's foreign policy, internal deliberation is insane. it's a direct threat on the independence on the executive and it's an attempt ultimately to change our system of government from one where the president was elected by the people to one he is merely accountable and chosen by the house of representatives. that's a parliamentary system and what we have. >> none of us is safe from this. stephen cohen, the congressman from tennessee actually accused
7:14 pm
us, on your show of being coconspirators. they said we are in on it. he called me a quisling which is another term for nazi because of that interview you had. the idea that a congressman would say that because we have a different view of the constitution shows you how far some extremist radical democrats will go. >> laura: i don't take any of these people seriously. they do not believe in free expression. fundamentally they are shrinking the first amendment and they don't believe apparently a president has an ability to invoke his own privilege. if he does they will accuse him up obstruction. this is becoming -- i respect or democrats, this is becoming the antifreedom party across the board. mother's college campuses or this. congressman maddow said this in
7:15 pm
response to the whistle-blower not yet having to testify in person. watch. >> why should he get to call his witnesses and have them come in and testify in a in a back-and-forth dialogue and yet the whistle-blower is only going to answer questions in a written format spirit >> laura: i have lindsey graham coming up and i will ask him the same thing. that is how the lawyers for this whistle-blower, it qualifies. submitting written answers, is that enough? >> here's the problem, the statute protects whistle-blowers and anonymity. unless they've made false statements, knowingly false or disregarding -- >> laura: not from the media. no. there's nothing protected from the media. it doesn't protect it from congress. no. i don't think so. >> my point is, even if that
7:16 pm
statute applied here it doesn't apply when he's made knowingly false statements or disregard to the truth and his complaint has several knowingly false statements. he signed on the form that he was a first-hand witness and in the complaint he acknowledges he had no firsthand knowledge of the conversation. there's other things that we need to go to the bottom of what this guy. will legally linked to the information to him? he falsely complained he gather this information in pursuit of his job duties. the cas job does not include spying on the united states president and the white house. there are several blatantly false and illegal things admitted and that ought to be investigated. >> laura: that's why they don't want the whistle-blower on capitol hill. three questions, the whistle-blower would not have too much credibility. you do have the transcripts. >> apparently everybody knows who he is and eventually he will be revealed and eventually you
7:17 pm
will be cross-examined i'm sure. >> laura: there is conflicting reports over whether john bolton will testify on thursday. originally reported he was behind closed doors and then it was reported it's not clear that he is. we don't know, but we do have reporting tonight that ukrainian business man who had the association with 40 giuliani has flipped on the president, whatever that means. the president said he never met him i didn't remember him and that offended him. any thoughts on that? >> they have him and of course they've indicted him in there putting pressure on him. that's what happens. people flip when there is pressure. the idea there is conflict whether he knew the president or didn't. any of us were in the public life know people take pictures with us, but we don't know who they are great at the end it will turn out that there was not
7:18 pm
a close relationship. to her the president it has to be testimony about him and against him. i don't see that forthcoming from the source. >> laura: gentlemen, great to see you. and moments democrats are facing back lish thanks to nancy pelosi and adam schiff. will that mean a red wave in 2020? lara trump think so and she joins us next. as
7:19 pm
7:20 pm
7:21 pm
7:22 pm
>> corrupt politicians, nancy pelosi and adam schiff has resulted in even more brazen assault, impeachment witch hun witch hunts. >> laura: the 2020 election is a year away from today. can you believe it? despite weeks of impeachment and
7:23 pm
sanity, check out. and you poll showing that he's in a dead heat with democrats and battleground states. the left of course is freaking out. >> alert from democrats, new poll shows president trump code win key battleground states. >> democrats have not made enough progress. >> a huge wake-up call. our party needs to recognize this as a much tougher fight. donald trump's formidable parent >> laura: on top of that the rnc is spending a lot of money targeting swing district democrats who voted yes on that impeachment resolution. joining me now is lara trump, the president's daughter in law and senior advisor to the trump 2020 campaign. great to see you tonight. what is the trump campaign doing right now to capitalize on voters unused? >> first of all, everybody knows
7:24 pm
exactly what this is. this is such a nonsensical sham impeachment, a coup against the president. that becomes clearer and clearer every single day and people understand that democrats are so desperate because what are they going to run on? look at what this president has done. 6.7 million new jobs created under donald trump. you saw the october jobs report just came out, 223,000 new jobs added. you just saw tonight, look at his rally. how can you compete against that? they can't do it so they're trying to throw impeachment at him, but at the trump campaign we are welcoming that because internally we have seen the number is four president trump go up thanks to nancy pelosi calling for impeachment. three-point since you called for this nonsense and voters aren't buying it. they're feeling the results and so were capitalizing on that spirit we have the ability to have the president around the
7:25 pm
country like you saw tonight talking about the great things s known. americans feel it, they're not dumb and the polls you mentioned, "the new york times" poll asked by the numbers are probably better than that. >> laura: i want to share something that bloomberg is reporting looking at various financial models. here's the headline. "trump's reelection likely if economy stays on course." examining various economic indicators saying that during u.s. expansion puts him on course to win reelection and these are all the models that show a track record, a really good one. the forecast from yale, ray fehr, oxford economics, there based on trump being boosted by steady economic growth. historically tight labor market and limited inflation. my question to you is, why
7:26 pm
aren't his numbers higher? with this economy you would want his numbers up at 55%'s. do the numbers matter? are they skewed? what do you think? >> if we believe the polls than hillary clinton would be our president because they all said back in 2016, days away from that election that she was going to be elected president and donald trump had no shot. when it comes to this president i think even more so now than in 2016, people are scared to voice their support and they're scared to post on social media. they are scared to wear a hat or a shirt or talk to pollsters that are not being. to us those numbers don't mean a whole lot. whenever we go out across the country and we see the love that the president receives like you saw at the rally, like we all see around airports or airplanes. the number of people who come up to us, even in new york it happens to me on the street.
7:27 pm
people love this president. those kind of feelings and the numbers we internally have made a lot more to us than those polls. >> laura: the concern that is expressed is about female voters. the president i did very well wh female voters in the 2016 race, better than the projections expected. the concern by the professional, the expert says that women don't like him. he's rough droned, he says it curse word every now and then. women want everything to calm down. is that a legitimate concern, are you concerned at all about female suburban voters? >> i think women like a fighter. i think they are more women out there that support donald trump that will ever tell anyone. that is why the trump campaign, we launched a coalition over the summer, women for trump coalition. we want to encourage women to
7:28 pm
talk to your friends and to post on social media and talk to the parents of your kids, classmates. the reality is that so many more people out there support donald trump, they're just scared to say it. we of course are looking at women and making sure we are doing everything we can to wins women votes, but i think his numbers will be higher with women and 2020. >> laura: you think you will build on it, that's fascinating. i think african-american support, latino support will see an uptick. this is an interesting scenario and the democrats are freaking out. i don't care what they're trying to say. they're freaking out. now buttigieg is only at 9% and the polls, but he's got a lot of money. he said this to "the washington post" on his campaign bus on saturday about running as a midway point between elizabeth warren and bernie sanders or even bite in. he said, if you want the most
7:29 pm
ideological far out candidate possible you have your answer. if you want the most washington candidate bernie sanders or even biden. , you've got your answer, everybody else can come our way and that's almost everybody. he's clearly trying to go into that space that he thinks is not being properly occupied by joe biden. he is more of a middle of the road kind of guy. does that concern the trump campaign? >> not at all. it doesn't matter who this president runs against. we are not worried about him at all and if anybody watches those debates and if you were able to stay awake, they were so boring. you sigh he is very radical and far left on many of his policies. i don't think people will be fooled by that spirit of the debates i am looking forward to is weber donald trump debates because those will be fireworks and we shall get our popcorn ready. >> laura: good to see you. thank you for being with us.
7:30 pm
>> i have a word and it sort of became old fashion. it's called a national list. we are not supposed to use that word? do you know what i am, i'm a nationalist. >> laura: fed used to be a bipartisan philosophy, one that means to be put forward as an american citizen first ide idea. their people people who put you in the office. past presidents like reagan had totally different beliefs, yet their goal was to make americans lives better. today's democratic party and the lemmings in the media, nationalism is a dirty word. >> nationalist. use that word, it's a favorite of the ultra-right and loaded with nativists and racial undertones. >> it is wrapped up in the connotations of and aggressiveness, dominance of one race in one over another.
7:31 pm
>> he's a white man who is a nationalist people are concerned. >> laura: rich lowry, the editor of national review and the author of the new book, the case for nationalism. congrats on the book. everybody get out and get it and learn something about where we are. here is what jeff bezos personal newspaper, "the washington post" "washington post" said yearbook is part of a larger effort to create an framework for trump and to contort his impulses to agaito acoherent worldview. your response? >> i don't think i contort anything and the democrats fdr and jfk, they all had nationalist tendencies, but the democrats turn their back on nationalists and what the more cosmopolitan direction. that is why this force was therefore donald trump to pick up and it's a natural force. it's a powerful force and it's
7:32 pm
very old, efforts to eradicate it throughout history have failed. the last clip you should before i came on about, he's white and he's a nationalist, so was alexander hamilton, so was abraham lincoln and teddy roosevelt. it's disgusting to have encountered this, their people on the left as you know, if they're not accusing someone else of bigotry, they would be rendered practically mute. >> laura: people in your own magazine, the national review have written about nationalism in a very negative way and you are a very open minded editor. you have all points of view on the conservative spectrum which is fine even some of that is a small spectrum. they along with people they laugh try to blanket, make a blanket statements. this is giving aid and comfort to the worst of the worst, the racists, nativists, people who
7:33 pm
don't like immigrants. your reaction? >> i think that is completely wrong. nationalism is a doctrine that people united by culture and history should govern. in more practical terms, you put your own people interest first and he put your nation's interests first. internationalism it's a loyalty above tribe and ethnicity and any sort of subnational division. he looked throughout her history and it's the nationalists who are pushing for greater civil rights. whether it was lincoln's more nationalists in the 20th century. this is a smear and a misunderstanding and one reason i wrote the book. i want trump supporter us to understand why the arguments are wrong and i want people who are skeptical or oppose trump to read the book and realize they're wrong. >> laura: this is all playing out, you wrote your book and you frame this and in europe -- angela merkel a couple of weeks
7:34 pm
ago said she was sad to report that multiculturalism is failing -- it has failed. your same big protest today in greece over the influx of more refugees. sweet ends in turmoil, political turmoil because of refugees. are they all horrible and awful people because they want to preserve their country. >> "the washington post" review, they suggest that i'm somehow bigoted or the book is bigoted because i say in the 20th century, it's a large influx of immigrants by having a robust culture and machinery of assimilation. we need that now today and that is said to constitute some hostility to all immigration, it's ridiculous. assimilation is good for us were already here in our country. it's good for the immigrants. ultimately it's welcoming to assume they can actually become fully american which they should
7:35 pm
want to do. >> laura: absolutely. i'm really glad he wrote this book. very important. thank you so much for being with us. congratulations. coming up, is the senate g.o.p. relay caving to the left's quid pro quo narrative? senator lindsey graham joins us next and the democrats plan to fight this next. ♪ >> tech: so you think this chip is nothing to worry about?
7:36 pm
7:37 pm
well at safelite, we know sooner or later every chip will crack. these friends were on a trip when their windshield got chipped. so they scheduled at safelite.com.
7:38 pm
they didn't have to change their plans or worry about a thing. i'll see you all in a little bit. and i fixed it right away with a strong repair they can trust. plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. >> customer: really?! >> tech: being there whenever you need us that's another safelite advantage. >> singers: safelite repair, safelite replace.
7:39 pm
♪ >> laura: last week and a series of angles i warned senate republicans that if they don't step up and vociferously defend this president against this ongoing farce, democrats would exact revenge on them if they haven't for a bed went on to win big in 2020. on cue "the washington post" reported over the weekend that a growing number of g.o.p. senators consider acknowledging trump since quid pro quo on ukraine. the media, they are running wild with it. >> some senates are on the brink
7:40 pm
of publicly admitting that there was a yo ukraine quid pro quo. >> they're arguing for a shift in strategy, acknowledging the quid pro quo, but insisting it's not an impeachable offense. >> it's the republican party and they're realizing they have nowhere else to go except for acknowledging there was a quid pro quo. >> laura: hold on. joining me now is lindsey grah lindsey graham, chairman of the senate judiciary committee. is this true and is this a rhetorical argument? assuming all of your facts nancy and adam, assuming it's true, it's still not impeachable. is that is what is going on? >> here is what you could take, there's not one vote impeachment. based on the phone call. i don't believe met romney would vote to remove the president over the phone call. one, he did nothing wrong.
7:41 pm
if that's an impeachable offense you won't have any presidents left. >> laura: in kentucky tonight, a lot of kids had read the transcript t-shirts. of course i read a transcript! you don't respect me. >> it was just to get you going. there was nothing wrong with that phone call. did he say, unless to investigate opponent, did he say that? has anyone said that. what did the president say? i didn't take this as a quid pro quo. we didn't cut off aid and joe biden wasn't investigated. >> laura: rand paul of kentucky, he was at this rally and he was pushing the senate to be strong. watch. >> president trump has great courage and he faces down the fake media every day. congress needs to step up and have equal courage to defend the president!
7:42 pm
if schiff will not let hunter about income and if you will not bring the whistle-blower forward, every republican should take a walk and say this is a farce. >> laura: if you don't have these witness has walk out, what are your thoughts? >> i believe the statute has become a dangerous tool on the wrong hands. it's designed to keep somebody from being fired if they report corruption. it was never designed to keep somebody anonymous. >> laura: it's not in the statute itself. >> with all due respect, you can prosecute somebody. impeachment is the political death penalty based on the anonymous source. we need the whistle-blower's name did we need to they are and they need to be cross-examined under oath about any vices they may have. we need to look at whether or not hunter biden corruptly engaged in lobbying. did joe biden asked the prosecutor to be fired because
7:43 pm
he was investigating his son? john solomon has given us plenty to look at. i hope chairman, the foreign intelligence chairman will open up an investigation about the role of the state department and all of this. >> laura: that's always a thorn in the science of conservatives because they have a different worldview and they're in for long haul. >> communications, the bottom line is the company that hunter biden was serving as a board member, they went to the state department and said if the prosecutor doesn't leave hunter biden alone, it's going to hurt us. that to me is a bombshell of all bombshells which should lead to a senate investigation. >> laura: how could he not call him?
7:44 pm
>> the member of the board actually met with john kerry. >> laura: let's move on to what's happening on this whistle-blower from's. the whistle-blower's attorney said we will submit written answers spread what can be wrong with written answers? >> if you're in charge with the crime and the person accusing you of wrongdoing, they don't have the ability to say i will take written questions. you have a right to confront your accuser and this idea of saying they will take written questions violates every norm of due process. can you imagine if a republican had done this with democrat? we would keep anonymous, accusing the democratic president of wrongdoing and they said they will take questions of the whole town would blow up. >> laura: didn't trump do written questions? >> he is the president of united states and they grade on written questions. when you accuse somebody of a crime you can't do it anonymously. you can't get a parking ticket based on an anonymous source.
7:45 pm
>> laura: people forgot senator graham was an impeachment manager c been down this road. any other advice for the senators? you weren't impeachment manager and you go and present your position. the senators don't get to ask questions, they just have to sit and listen. >> you can ask written questions. >> laura: but you can't interrupt the impeachment manager. >> ever impeachment except this one was conducted by outside counsel. on the one guy that said robert mueller wasn't on a witch hunt. i took a lot of heat. >> laura: i think from me. >> i said i trust the guy to do his job and i introduced legislation saying he it could be fired without cause. adam schiff isn't looking for the truth, jerry nadler is not looking for the truth. what is going on is a bunch of partisan b.s. every republican senator that signed on my resolution sandy
7:46 pm
process wasn't fair, we should continue to prosecute the people prosecute any president. we should let every american know this is the first time in history anyone has ever been impeached by partisan end. if you think adam schiff is out to get the truth, you shouldn't be any senate. all of those should be throwing the b.s. flag on this process. >> laura: lindsey graham, great to see you, thanks for coming on board as a senator mentioned, i bombshell report detailing troubling contacts between hunter biden and the obama administration. john solomon has all the exclusive reporting tonight. stay there.
7:47 pm
7:48 pm
7:49 pm
7:50 pm
♪ >> laura: breaking tonight, hunter biden and ukrainian gas company pressured the obama
7:51 pm
administration to end corruption allegations against them. not according to new reporting by john solomon who joins us now. along with dan bongino, author of the book "exonerated." chapter dedicated to the bidens and ukraine. >> hunter biden gets a job in ukraine, he starts working his dad's contact. one of the advisors to joe biden, he has a few meetings with him in 2015 and something big happens and ukraine. they rate hunter biden's bosses home. february 2016, hunter biden's lobbyists are at the state department said you need to stop these allegations, hunter biden is on the board. a couple of days after that his business partner meets with john kerry and not too long after that, he fires the prosecutor he knows. that's it in a nutshell. >> laura: dan, biden said he did know anything about this.
7:52 pm
this is a big conspiracy theory and they have all these friends in the media who are out there trashing solomon's reporting and he reminded me, hundred front page stories for "the washington post" when he worked for "the washington post." they left him then, but now he's looking into something else. what are your thoughts? >> it's fascinating. they can call it a conspiracy theory all they want. it's certainly a conspiracy, but it's not a theory. i follow his work at admire it and i've been following it for a long time. he has government documents from ukraine! legal teams for burisma, their own document indicated that everything democrats are telling you and by democrats i mean the media, it's not true! think about it, one of the myths he debunked last week was that burisma case was closed down. don't worry, joe biden couldn't have been influencing the case because the case wasn't open.
7:53 pm
that is just not true! that's not backed up by actual facts and the media which previously was interested in this case, politico and "the washington post" before biden became a candidate. now they perceive him to be a threat to a trumpet and have backed off their coverage >> laura: it's a stunner, there are many reporters laughed we don't have a severe political bias. also not pointing out the obvious, adam schiff complaining that the trump administration, deep six arena bottom edge. wash. >> she had a well earned reputation as a fighter of corruption. what is this back channel sanctioned by the president do? it seeks to remove someone fighting corruption and ukraine by employing a vicious smear campaign in which the state department at the highest level acknowledged had no merit whatsoever.
7:54 pm
>> laura: trump had no right apparently. >> apparently the power doesn't have the power to appoint his own people. march of this year, i picked up a phone call and it's a career diplomat. he said you won't believe with ukraine ambassador adjusted, there is an election and she just gave a speech calling for the removal of a official. i start digging into her. who is this person. it's interesting. i find out and 2018, pete sessions writes a letter to mike pompeo because she's bad mouthing donald trump. her embassy is funding george soros. you go through all these things and there is a big body of record, she is not allied with the president but he didn't need any reason at all to fire her. it's contrived. >> laura: at the state department, and the intel community are still working against this president's
7:55 pm
interests and that's not a conspiracy. john knows it and i know it. your thoughts? close it out. >> i was given credible information from the same people john talked to, she was doing that. she was bad mouthing the president elected by the people and they do not prosecute list, there may be merit to that end and certainly worth entertaining. if they had anything to do with a list of people who should not be touched by the local justice department, it's worth looking into. it's always a conspiracy theory if it affects donald trump in a negative way. it's not real reporting. >> laura: thank you so much. up next, if up a moment you will have never have wanted to miss. stay tuned. as a doctor, i agree with cdc guidance.
7:56 pm
i recommend topical pain relievers first... like salonpas patch large. it's powerful, fda-approved to relieve moderate pain, yet non-addictive and gentle on the body. salonpas. it's good medicine. hisamitsu.
7:57 pm
7:58 pm
doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
7:59 pm
>> tech: don't wait for a chip like this to crack your whole windshield. with safelite's exclusive resin, you get a strong repair that you can trust. plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. >> customer: really?! >> singers: safelite repair, safelite replace. >> this should be the final play of the ball game. tyler gets three, throws, and zone! caught!
8:00 pm
touchdown! and the big green when it! a miracle, dartmouth stays undefeated! >> laura: that was my alma mater dartmouth taking down harvard on a last-second hail mary pass. it was awesome, six seconds to go. playing princeton's we can, both undefeated. that's all the time we have tonight, shannon bream and the "fox news @ night" team take it all from here, shannon. >> shannon: that's fancy football, you iv leaders. you get it done. we begin tonight with a fox news alert. antidepressant rallies thousands in a key state with a slate of big races on tap for tomorrow. the political makeup of state legislatures, who will win my governor's mansion's? what tomorrow's off year election means in the presidential election is exactly one year from today. matt bevin joins us live fresh off the president's last-minute push for him. also tonight, the latest in the house democrats impeachment inquiry, who will and will not show up for more close doors to

108 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on