>> tucker: no time for "final exam" tonight, bret baier competes against his college roommate. someone you've seen before but didn't know who he lived with. great show tomorrow. 8:00 eastern. here is sean hannity. >> sean: i'm betting on the roommate..n fox news division hates fox opinion division, i'm going to bet on the other guy. i'm sandwiched between you and laura getting in trouble every night. i have to bail you both out. >> tucker: i'm a peacemaker. >> sean: oh, yeah, okay. right. welcome to "hannity," breaking tonight. major shocking new detail surrounding the nonwhistle-blower whistle-blower, including more damning evidence that his attorney is nothing more than a deep state hate-trump political hit man. plus we'll address thehe radical socialist democrats running for the white house.

this is important. we haven't been paying enough attention to it, the great one, mark levin, i just talked to him. he's going to be here tonight, you don't want to miss it. don jr. here tonight, if you missed "the view" today, wow, he called out the whistle-blower hypocrisy, we'll give you a quick snippet and play more later. >> chasing down a whistle-blower about all of the epstein stuff because those stories were killed. c if we are going to have a conversation about whistle-blowers -- you work with cbs to out the whistle-blower. >> sean: the ladies of "the view" had a tough day, we'll play much more coming up u later in the program. don jr. will join us. we'll get the behind-the-scenes story, but start with breaking new developments about the so-called attorney representing the phony, nonwhistle-blower hearsay whistle-blower, his name mark zade, hyperpartisan,

deranged, trump-hating political operative, he has clearly been plotting impeachment and this coup from day one, look at b your screen. thanks to foxnews.com, this is what we know. on january 30th, 2017, the president has only been in office tenar days and guess wha? he tweeted #coup, and he kept going throughout the year july 1, 2017, tweeting we will get rid of him and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters, we have to. there's more. for months, heed tweeted incessantly about president trump's impeachment, comparisons to nixon, tweets fantasizing about life after the president being impeached, there is even a tweet highlighting how fake news and cnn is going to

help take trump down. "i predict cnn will play a key role in president trump not finishing out his term as president." he has appeared on fake news cnn a whopping 11 times since he started obsessing and fantasizing about impeachment, on twitter. he gave us a statement saying those tweets were reflective and repeated the sentiments of millions of people, that he was referring to a perfectly legal process. okay. a totally reasonable impeachment go attempt he started ten days after the president was sworn in. sure. he is a sort of the face of this trump derangement syndrome, last night in monroe, louisiana, then president had this to say about mr. ten days into office impeachment mania.nt take a look. >> they hand me the story, that was a long time ago -- it's all a hoax.

they say january 2017, a coup has started and the impeachment will follow. it's all a hoax, it's a scam. you know the whistle-blower, the one who came out with trump said this and the trump said that and when they heard the real phone call, the whistle-blower disappeared. shifty schiff is a corrupt politician, nobody thought it was going to release the phone call. >> sean: that point the president is right on, there's eight quid pro quos the liar schiff was telling us. house republicans, guess what? they are going to subpoena the u nonwhistle-blower whistle-blower hearsay whistle-blower to testify. they plan to call the, yes, compromise, coward, congenital liar schiff to testify under

oath. he is a witness in this case. the whistle-blower and his handler, yes, that would be adam schiff and people in his office, they got to answer very serious questions -- we will lay out a few. we know his office was in contact with the hearsay whistle-blowere- before filing e complaint. 's loaded or member of of his office collude with the attorney what role did his office have been orchestrating the complaint? did they recommend the attorney? the nonwhistle-blower is a deep state holdover from the obama administration. we got a lot of questions for the hearsay whistle-blower. ties to joe biden, look at tonight's "washington examiner." reporting he's actually a guests of sleepy, creepy, crazy joe at a glitzy lunch in 2016 to honor the prime minister of italy. by the way, what was the relationship to john brennan? number one trump hater of them all. did anyone from the obama administration encourage him to

file this complaint and get involved in these activities, where did he get the thirdhand material? t it's perfectly obvious what is going on here, it's not our first rodeo. russia, russia, russia. the whistle-blower is not some kind of concerned government employee. to me, he looks very partisan, he looks like a hack who hired a hack, partisan democrat hate rage trump attorney with ties to biden and schiff in his office worked for trump hater brennan and other top democrats. it's not hard to figure out. maybe that's why he hired the impeach trump after ten days attorney to be his attorney, maybe that's why he coordinated with the congenital liar, maybe and likely that's why he and schiff desperately don't want him to testify because they would have to answer those questions. the congenital liarse adam schi, three years of lying about trump andr russia.

we got all the evidence, all of it! now, he had none of it. he's not on a fact-finding mission, his first witch hunt failed and now he's begun the unsecond witch hunt. three years, lies, russian collusion, impeachment. even if the so-called whistle-blower was a real whistle-blower, the facts are the statute protecting anonymity doesn't exist.t. he is protected against retribution, retaliation, nobody guaranteed anonymity in the statute. that means you better not reveal the name of the nonwhistle-blower, you are in deep trouble. no, you are not. plenty of people have named the nonwhistle-blower already, i know the name of the nonwhistle-blower, our newno guest -- gregg jarrett, his best-selling book out. "witch hunt" the story of the greatest mass delusion and political history. this is the next chapter which he should probably start

writing the book now. >> don't make me do that. >> sean: on the law, are there any anonymity guarantees for a whistle-blower? >> there's no entitlement guarantee under the whistle-blower law to anonymity. it's a persistent myth which is really quite confounding. there is one narrow provision that gives discretion to the inspector general to disclose or not disclose but that has no application to anyone else. let's assume for the sake of argument that a whistle-bloweror deserves anonymity. this one doesn't because he doesn't qualify as a whistle-blower under the law. you have to meet two conditions -- he doesn't meet either one of them and don't take my word for it, the office of legal counsel and the department of justice as well as the acting director of national intelligence both said he is not a whistle-blower under the law. nevertheless, you will never

hear this from the media that never bothers to open a law book. >> sean: a personbo in america does have a right to face their accusers, i may have picked that up somewhere, maybe i made it up. let me ask you about another column you wrote, you identified four laws that you believe would be applicable to joe biden, it is illegal for a person to coerce or influence through bribery or extortion -- a billion dollars -- a foreign nation into taking action -- fire the prosecutor -- that might financially benefit the person or his family or business -- hunter. does that apply? >> extortion, bribery, most importantly the foreign corrupt practices act, the person, especially a public official, cannot use coercion and influence through money to demand a benefit that would extend to himself or his family.

>> sean: is that 18 usc 201? let me read it, whoever gives something of value to influence an official act is guilty of bribery. 201b, giving or offering anything of value to a public official in exchange for any official act. a billion dollars, you have six hours and fire the prosecutor, you don't get the billion if you don't fire him. is that a quid pro quo? >> it's absolutely a quid pro quo, the question is is it a legal or illegal quid pro quo, and it depends on biden's intent. the circumstantial evidence, especially john solomon's are, shows that it appears that joe biden's motivation was to protect his son. that's what the fired prosecutor said, he was closing in on burisma and hunter biden. that's why he was fired by bid

biden. >> sean: when you use hunter's name -- can you please come obama state department stop looking into us, we even have hunter biden on our board. oh,oa now it makes sense, this s been so hard and so difficult and so complicated. gregg jarrett, great work. now let's turn to some more breaking developments, newly released transcripts from the top-secret schiff soviet-style impeachment coup attempt. bad news for democrats. career state department official -- george, you will me an apology, we are going to be talking about this soon. testified he had no knowledge that usa aid to ukraine was ever connected to an investigation request and he said the government of ukraine had no idea there was a temporary hold on aid until a month after thehe president's phone call. they got the money without doing anything. that's not all. can also raise concerns about the biden and burisma holdings, even mentioned yours truly, i

will accept the guy's apology. he also testified i wasi talkig to the state department about the former ambassador to ukraine. i'm going to spell it out for all of yourafo one more time, i suggest you read my twitter account. i don't know anything about that lady. i have no idea how to pronounce her last name, i never talked to secretary pompeo or anybody at the state department about her or anything else, a i don't know anything about her. i would advise you all very strongly -- i'm saying this in a nice way. all of you had better stop lying about me, you now have been told the truth again. stop lying. in fact, according to our own research, she was mentioned in passing four times on this show including by john solomon, he will join us in a minute. hehe was reporting on an intervw conducted with a top ukrainian justice official who claimed that this u.s. ambassador gave him a do not prosecute list.

filled with obama allies. that is the ag of the united states saying it, blame him -- take a look. >> it's true i have a difficult personal relationship with the ambassador. unfortunately from the first meeting with a u.s. ambassador, we had a list of people whom we should not prosecute. >> sean: to the media mob and those testifying, you want to a lash out at anyone? you might want to lash out at that guy, that prosecutor guy in the video that john solomon was interviewing. the ukraine story is zero experience hunter biden, 49-year-old son of the vice president, he gets millions of dollars as the vice president learns his son is being investigated from even "the new york times" and lo and behold.

joe goes to ukraine, he's leading up the efforts on behalf of the obama administration for ukraine. then we get the quid pro quo joe -- simple. he says, you've got sixd hours, fire the prosecutor, i'll give you a billion dollars. if you don't fire him, you're not getting the 6 billion. you have six hours. so when it comes to ukraine, you idiots in the media mob, i have been laser-focused on the bidens, that is the real ukrainian corruption, there is a real quid pro quo. thens transcript from george ket reveals a major bombshell about joe and hunter biden. according to kent, the obama administration tried to partner with ukrainian oil and gas giant burisma holdings, they are the ones paying no experience hunter all of those millions on a u.s. aid project until kent, i guess

to his credit, objected and he cited the firm's alleged corruption. later, hunter biden's sketchy no experience profitable connection -- it happened in other countries, too. how is it even possible for the mob to defend joe and hunter biden? #quidproquojoe. there is now damning evidence that paints a vivid picture of i would think that would be corruption, trying to buy favor, some might call it influence peddling, i call it quid pro quo joe. joining us now with more, fox news contributor john solomon, you have breaking news tonight. very quickly. is the guy in the interview we just played, he is the equivalent of the ag, because i don't know anybody in ukraine, he is the of william barr. >> he's a guy that was put in place because joe biden fired his predecessor and remember, joe biden vouched in that same tape where he talked about

firing the other guy, he said, i put a solid guy in place of him. now they've turned on lucenko because they don't like the story he's telling abouten hunter bide >> sean: as you were y interviewing him, you weren't supposed to report that, understood. let's go to what you developed tonight. >> george kent, that state department official testified in the summer of '16, he learned the u.s. state department's foreign aid bureau, usaid, had created a partnership with burisma and hunter biden, to do a clean energy project and he put a stop to it because heer was concerned that they had a reputation of being corrupt. why did that happen? we know this from something earlier i reported back on yourn show, hunter biden's partner, devon archer, texted an american lawyer and said, we just came back from usaid, they are going to give us a project and we are going to announce it. it's going to take the stain of

"the new york times" article calling is corrupt away. here's another piece of proof, u.s. state department trying to help hunter biden steer the narrative and sure as heck, they get the project and that's only because of george kent's interference that it stopped at the last minute. >> sean: why does that lady hate you so much? you were brought up a lot today in the hearings. were you lied about like i was lied about? >> i will tell you one thing that is very important. there is a he said, she said situation, here's what isn't in dispute. george kent testified, like state officials told me three months ago no matter what happened to the meeting on several occasions, the u.s. embassy did put pressure on ukraine prosecutors not to pursue certain prosecutions,re mostly of people that were allies of the embassy or george soros. george kent confirmed thaty today, he confirmed signing a letter saying back off the george soros group, he confirmed multiple names that lucenko gave me as people he and the embassyy raised.

>> sean: you know more about this country than anybody. here's what i know, if you fire the prosecutor, you get a billion, if you don't fire i the prosecutor, you don't get a billion, you have six hours, that's quid pro quo joe, we have a quid pro quo. john solomon. thank you. also tonight to the new extreme radical democrat socialist party is officially a dumpster fire of far-left socialism, they have done nothing for you, we, the people, they push conspiracy theories, hoaxes, lies, propaganda, they are constantly smearing, slandering, besmirching anyone they can, especially anyone associated with donald trump. they have now doubled down onth stupid in their economy killing agenda, we haven't talked enough about this. look at the numbers we are talking about. hundreds of trillions of dollars in new spending, very few specifics except they want to legalize stealing from the rich on how they are going to pay for all of this.

rememberm congresswoman ocasio-cortez's green new deal dream? that came at a price tag of $93 trillion, and how we have elizabeth warren's $52 trillion medicare for all plan.. you add it together, you have 145 trillion in new spending, in ten years. 4 trillion a year, four times ten -- we are 105 trillion short. everyone with a brain knows that would mean new taxes for everybody, wealth confiscation, not just for the wealthy, pretty much everybody. everybody knows that plan would destroy the united states of america, the economy in less than a week, deplete your 401(k), the lifeblood of our economy, oil and gas, is gone,eb we would have a national socialist venezuela nightmare on our hands. maybe that's why warren has repeatedly dodged the tough questions when asked about this, take a look.

>> hardworking middle-class families are going to see their costs go down. >> will their taxeski go up? >> here's the thing -- >> here's the thing, i listen to these answers a few time before. >> will middle-class taxes go up, will private insurance be eliminated? >> what families have to deal with is cost, total cost, that's what they have to deal with. >> how much are your costs going to goth down? >> how much will your taxes go up? >> it's how much the costs -- it's how much families end up spending. >> i know that argument, but will you pay more in taxes, why don't you want to answer that question? it's a republican talking point, it's not a republican talking points. it's a question. >> it's a question about where people are going to come out economically. >> that's not my question. that's not my question.t' >> sean: even that guy, the guy that gets a thrill up his leg, he has coined the term

obamagasm -- even he asked for the first time in his dolby career, a failed career, even he got the question right. now to get on board this new extreme democratic socialist agenda, you're going to have to suspend all intelligence, common sense, reason, rationality, have to be the biggest hypocrite in the world. democrats want to raise your taxes and will, they want to legalize stealing, they want another bite at the apple, then when you die, you have to dipay to die in america. they want to get rid of the lifeblood of the economy oil and gas, the combustion engine, and they will make it illegal to have your own private health insurance to get out of their government run system. how to keep your doctor and g py less work? they will support after birth abortion, ditch the electoral college, open up our borders,or stack the supreme court and it goes on from there. joining us now, we are glad to welcome back to the program, i can go on forever. we have our friend dan bongino

is with us, and fox news contributor emily compagno. dan, i throw it to you.. that's what they want, they want to get rid of this president for no reason, to get -- with russia they had to ignore the dossier, now with ukraine, they have to ignore quid pro quo joe and everything they blame on trump, trump didn't do anything wrong. >> this is an impeachment for imbeciles. do you realize what grade a moron you have to be to believe in this? who are the main players -- the allegations, let's walk this slow for the liberals watching. the allegation is a quid pro quo, give me information on hunter biden or i will withhold military aid, that's the allegation.or nobody has confirmed this allegation. let's look at the players they've interviewed. gordon sondland who was our ambassador over there picked by trump, ambassador to the e.u.,

in a text message m specifically states to bill taylor that the president was "crystal-clear," there's no quid pro quo. even worse, sondland states he spoke to the president of the funited states, who was in a bad mood, which is irrelevant and asked about what he wants from ukraine, the president says to him "nothing, i want nothing." if this is a quid pro quo, it is the single worst and dumbest quid pro quo in human history. you can't extort someone who doesn't know they are being extorted and when nobody knows what the extortion actually is. it stupid. >> sean: emily, you are a lawyer. hunter and joe biden, fire him and you get a billion, don't fire him, you don't get anything -- you've got six b hours, that sounds like quid pro quo to me. i'm just a dopey talk show host, what do i know? >> it seems crystal-clear to me and in a vacuum for any average american voter and what is so

frustrating to people -- i get a handful of people who reach out every single day withh questions about this entire process. they say, i'm confused, explain it foror me. that's the average american citizen, sick of this amorphous, cloudy process that the democrats are putting everyone through without legislating. as well as that double standard that is coming from the left that doesn't apply to anyone when it's on the other shoe. everyone is exhausted and confused. and certainly when you put it in a vacuum, of course it's quid pro quo. >> sean: i'm going to have made up t-shirts and bumper #quidproquojoe. congrats on the book, dan bongino. i'm going to give them away to the audience. on fisa, it's coming. jason chaffetz, the great one mark levin is on fire he is going to blow up the story of the whistle-blower's attorney, we will hear from rush limbaughh

and donald trump jr. he will join us straight-ahead. we'll show you that tape. ♪ sight-ahead. this blt is delicious! made it myself. i love this place! made that myself, too. order up. fries on the side. right where i like 'em. don't forget the grease fire. burn, baby -- wait, what? -[ alarm beeping ] -i said grease fire. what are you doing on the counter? when owning a small business gets real... sorry. can i get a to-go box? ...progressive helps protect what you built -with customizable coverage. -aah!

they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again!

wheeveryone is different.ta, which is why xfinity mobile is a different kind of wireless network that lets you design your own data. choose unlimited, shared data, or mix lines of each and switch any line, anytime. giving you more choice and control compared to other top wireless carriers. save up to $400 a year when you switch. plus, get 50% off when you buy any new lg phone. xfinity mobile. click, call or visit a store today. ♪ >> sean: all right, i'm i'm ♪ >> sean: all right, i'm sickf of waiting, i know many of you are sick of waiting. we hear the highly anticipated

fisa report is being finalized by the inspector general, he has 600 people working for them, what is taking soei long? ewhile recent reports suggest we would get the report sometime after thanksgiving, i was hearing it would come sooner. here's somebody who knows the inspector general, also attorney, columnist, david limbaugh -- look at his new book that just came out. "power grab, the liberal scheme to undermine trump, gop, and our republic," a "new york times" best seller also. welcome, both of you, to the d ogram. congrats on your book, jason. you know, horowitz, i'm sick of it, i'm tired of hearing it, i'm tired of the audience hearing it's coming, i'm tired that he has 600 employees and they can't

get this job done faster, how long has this been and how long do we have to wait now because it's getting old? >> i'm getting sick of it as well, the attorney general william barr thought it was going to come out in may, i think it's actually going toen happen before thanksgiving. i've talked to enough people who think it's right on that precipice, i don't think it has anything to do with horowitz delaying it, i think it's the fact that durham is moving forward on some prosecution and one other point, i learned a long time ago from inspectors general, when the subjects of the investigation start squealing before it's published, you know it's going to be devastating. that would be brennan, clapper,, comey, and mccabe. those people are squealing the most. they are going to take it, it the hardest in this report. >> sean: david limbaugh, you're a great attorney, i see a slam-dunk case.or sort of like hillary's obstruction case. slam-dunk. we know they were warned, premeditated, we know the bulk

of the information in the fisa application, we know it's the dirty bought and paid for hillary dossier, we know it's unverifiable because the author didn't stand by it himself under oath. b how is that not premeditated fraud, why would it take 400 years to get the report? >> i sure hope they are uncovering every stone to prove the point you are making, sean. there's a common thread with ukraine. both cases are based on fraudulent sketchy evidence, that's the common thread with the democrats. they went after trump not disclosing that this was opposition research paid for by hillary, that steele had an anti-trump agenda, that he was fired by the fbi, that he presented a news article to the fisa court that was also sourced from christopher steele. what a fraud. we don't realize how serious a matter this is. the fisa court involves extraordinary circumstances, you have to have strong evidence because of the extraordinary

privacyy concerns that are involved in these kind of warrants. as you said, the grassley memo showed that most of the warrant application was based on the steele dossier, the democrats pooh-poohed that, so did the never trumpers. now we come out and find out if totally true. >> sean: that is a slam-dunk case, premeditated fraud on the fisa court. if i lied to a judge or let's say i deleted subpoenaed emails, cleaned up my hard drive, remove the sim cards, i would go toou jail. if i committed premeditated fraud on a court to spy on a presidential candidate, i think i would go to jail, i don'thi kw why i would think that but i just do. >> if you did that, you should go to jail. it said at the very top of this that it was verified, look for in this report to the communications that happened after this report was submitted because there's a lot of concern that brennan and clapper and

some of these others had communication after the factpp that shows what they had done previously wasn't necessarily true and verified. at a certain point the court has to stand for itself and go after some people. you can't just lie to the court. >> sean: you are a great attorney, you've done every contract in my career, brilliant attorney, you've done every contract for your brother, i think you've done every one for the great one, he was on everybody's contracts. if all that is true, why is this so hard? i don't think you could get me out of jail with that, as smart as you are. >> i really don't understand it, i don't understand why it's taking so long and what they are ultimately going to do. you tend to be pessimistic because democrats always seem to skate on these things, they haven't been held to account for starting this whole thing in the first place, they haven't been held to account for lying about the trump-russia hoax, think

about that. theyed pivoted to ukraine, noboy ever stings them back. it's time that these counter reports, these counter investigations by durham and the ig yield some fruit because the public demands accountability. this cannot continue to go on. jason has been great on this, this has got to stop as a deterrent for future conduct likeke this. >> sean: thank you, both, great analysis. congrats to both of you, books on amazon.com, bookstores everywhere. as i laid out in the monologue -- we are going to be joined in a minute, don, jr., wait till you see this tape. he's going to be on the show and give us behind the scenes in a minute. you've got this whistle-blower-nonwhistle-blower lawyer, blatant anti-trump bias, ten days after the president is sworn in, he's talking about impeachment. with all of that said, there's only one guy we can bring into tear this up. his show, number one on sunday nights has been moved to 8:00

starting this weekend, there is his book, "unfreedom of the press," when does your show start at eight? >> 8:00 p.m. eastern time, it starts this sunday. >> sean: congratulations, you've been number one for the whole time you have been on the air, i don't know what to say. take us through this. >> for my whole life. but thank you. >> sean: thanked me. >> all right, look, first of all, who's ever heard of a whistle-blower who is someone who is backed by the establishment? normally if a whistle-blower is challenging the system, you have the entire establishment, the media, the democratic party, part of the republican party backing the whistle-blower -- i've really never seen anything like this, it's bizarre. the reason you have whistle-blower protections is because the whistle-blower is going against the system. in this case, we have the president going against the system and the whistle-blower going against the president of the united states. i want to explain to the american people in a way that even joe scarborough can understand what the law is. you are hearing a lot of lies from schiff and the democrats ii these phony legal analysts.

andy mccarthy did a good job in "the national review," i've talked about this on radio, too. the whistle-blower statute does not apply to the president of the united states, does not apply to conversations the president of the united states has with leaders of other country, and it does not applyf to foreign policy. the whistle-blower statute does not apply to the president or the phone call, i hope richard burr is listening, the head of the senate intelligence committee. which really is not a very intelligent committee. number 2, the so-called whistle-blower does not have statutory protection, he doesn't meet the statutory elements. he was not an official who reports on intelligence activities within the purview of the director of national intelligence. he was serving temporarily on the national security council reporting to the president. number 3, the law does not -- hello!ng

does not guarantee anonymity to a whistle-blower, only the inspector general of the intelligence community is to keep it confidential withsp certain exceptions. president can release the name, congress can, the media is not bound, and interestingly enough, the intelligence committe did release his name by accident last night in their transcript. i guess we should arrest adam schiff for that and a thousand other reasons. congress has never provided overarching legal protection to any whistle-blower, certainly not in the context of launching an impeachment investigation, so why are they hiding this guy from me, we, the people, we know his name, we know all about him and yet the same newspapers that put out the pentagon papers and everything else, they are keeping it secret. how can you impeach a president this guy who was a political hack, a political hack without the senate, the president of the public scrutinizing his motives, his credibility, and his

veracity. it's not that the substance of the complaint is determinative, it's the fact of his complaint! this is the second impeachment document they have put together. his coux-ster lawyers, i'm sure that adam schiff's staff was involved will want to know who was involved, the democrats, the media, feckless republicans, they would have us impeach a president without knowing who this guy is, he's a political hack yet we reportedly know who he is. this cover-up, that's what it is, it's intended to protect the democrat party, c the obama administration, this guy workede in the obama administration, adam schiff, who knows all about this guy, he hired a couple old staffers, they are on his staff now -- i have no doubt they are involved in this process, who else do they want to protect? joe biden! nobody has asked to joe about this guy, he knows him, he has

to protect him and he has to protect brennan. so it's intended to protect all of these people and his hack lawyers who haveec been runningw around saying, we are independent, we have no ax to grind. we even represented republicans -- his coup leading slip and fall lawyers, now we know all about them. the problem is adam schiff, like a good mobster, has decided you can't call this guy as a witness, you can't call me as a witness because you need my approval and i'm not going to give you the approval. the head mobster of this operation says i'm in charge of who the witnesses can be and i'm not going to let you call these people so it's a grand cover-upr the perpetrator, adam schiff, is also the guy in charge of the cover-up. now here's the thing i want the american people to cal understa, the law is on the president's side, the facts are on the president's side and what they are attacking is the transition of power. they have never supported the transition of power from the

obama administration to the trump administration and i want roto remind adam schiff and all the slow learners on msnbc and cnn, the president sets foreign policy, it doesn't make a difference if you don't agree with it. i don't care if a former obama ambassador from the ukraine says they forced me out, too damn bad. we elected this president, he appoints whoever he wants and if he wants to treat ukraine in a certain way, he is free to do it. meanwhile ukraine got the military aid obama wouldn't give, the president of ukraine says what quid pro quo? our president says no quid pro quo. they go to bureaucrats who no one has ever heard of in the state department to say "i don't think the president should have done that" -- did you talk? no.si did you witness? no. did you have any first-hand? no. did you listen the phone call? yeah, but i don't think the transcript is right. what the hell is going on here? this is another hoax being perpetrated by the democrats!

a phony impeachment effort, like the phony russia effort!ph mr. president, stay strong, this will collapse eventually but we do need the whistle-blower to testify, schiff to testify, because the whole house of cards will collapse and the american people will see what -- this is an outrageous attack by them on the president. yes, sir. >> sean: i would add two more names to be questioned. hunter and joe because you knowm what, everyone is looking for a quid pro quo, we have quid pro quo joe. if you fire the prosecutor, i'll give you a billion dollars. you don't fire him, you are not getting the billion. you've got six hours that he was warned his son was being investigated, we call him zero experience hunter, i want them also put under oath. great one, 8:00, sunday night, new time, number one show on sundays on the fox news channel, we are proud of you. up next, donalder trump jr.

he went in and took down the ladies of "the view," it was an experience. we are going to show you the highlights, he will give us the behind the scenes, he joins us next. a ♪ billions of mouths.

billions of problems. dry mouth? parched mouth? cotton mouth? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath oral rinse and lozenges. help relieve dry mouth using natural enzymes to soothe and moisturize. so you can... breathe easy, there's therabreath at walmart.

here'sthe itchy ones.y ones.

the black, brown, red, and grey ones. the ones grown by dad. the ones grown for dad. 'cos whatever you grow, will save a bro' learn more at movember.com

the amount of student loan debt i have, i'm embarrassed to even say. we just decided we didn't want debt any longer. ♪ i didn't realize how easy investing could be. i'm picking companies that i believe in. ♪ i think sofi money is amazing. ♪ thank you sofi. sofi thank you, we love you. ♪

>> sean: donald trump jr. went on the view today to promote his brand-new book >> sean: donald trump jr, k.g. went on "the view" todaysu to promote his brand-new book which also happens to describe the scene surrounding his appearance with the ladies of "the view." >> lowering the discourse to his level, even if people are working, we don't want to have a country like that. do you understand that? >> we've all done things that we regret, if we are talking about bringing the discourse down. joy, you have worn black face.

whoopi, you've said roman polanski, it wasn't rape rape when he raped a child. who >> sean: joining us now, author of the new book, "triggered" the president's son, executive vice president, donald trump jr. you've got to tell says hello. >> hannity says hello, guys. [cheers and applause] how's it going, sean? >> sean: i'm watching this thing today and i'm like, why? why did you even bother? why? >> every once in a while you have to try, try to speak to everyone, in that case they didn't because you would think if you're invited on the show and they give you three segments, you would think if you are there to promote a book, they would ask you one question about the actual book but they didn't do that.do it's a little bit about why i

wrote "triggered," the title speaks for itself, i don't think they like me much anymore. or kim for that matter. s >> sean: i used to do all those stupid shows, the last time i went on that show, rosie o'donnell was hosting and lost her mind and poor barbara walters couldn't control the chaos. the reality is, look at this whole media thing -- okay, there's a quid pro quo, there's no quid pro quo. your father has faithfully executed the laws but there was a quid pro quo and that isid joe who knew his son was being investigated, you fire the prosecutor, you get a billion, you don't fire the prosecutor, you don't get a billion. quid pro quo joe, don. >> it's on tape in frontui of everyone and he's saying it that way, there's no ambiguity, no nothing. he was in control of it, hunter biden is getting boards of companies in languages he can't speak, why are you there? i'm never really thought about that -- well, i know why you're there. i think everyone in america knows why you are there.

[crowd reacts] we are having a good time in birmingham, alabama, doingwe a little bit of a "triggered" tour but i think these guys are all in agreement with us. [cheers and applause] >> sean: by the way, i started -- 90 miles north of birmingham, i was broadcasting in huntsville, alabama. i had a great two years there, the newspaper wrote an editorial when i left, goodbye to the talk show host from hell. i was very proud ofof that. >> that sounds like my average day. >> sean: i think we are in the boat. if a kid wearing a maga hat, results and what they did to nicholas sandmann, the lies, slander, this nears, i don't think there's any low -- i think the next 362 days is going to be a war every day to destroy you, your family, your dad with lies because they have been lying now for three years.no

>> that's exactly right, you saw what happened to me yesterday, i literally retweeted the article with the name of the supposed whistle-blower in the title of the article and there is outrage. "donald jr. outs whistle-blower." it was on drudge four days ago, it's on real clear politics, it was in breitbart, a couple other ,places. he's in danger of his life -- i'm like, this is a cia operative in danger of his life? i wish they would've shown a little bit of the same amount of outrage when my family opened up a white powder substance in an exploding envelope that showed up at my house. these guys are full of it. they aren't outraged that he was outed, they're outraged that now in his name is out there, everyone is able to realize thit is a guy that's tied to brennan, this is a guy that's tied to susan rice, this is a guy who worked for biden with the ukraine nonsense and this is a guy whose lawyer has been tweeting since january of '17, the coup has started, impeachment is next, we are going to get trump out of there.

this is a joke and they realize they got caught in the act again because they wanted this innocent public servant whistle-blower who is doing the right thing instead of just another one of the coup cabal of those clowns who have been doing this for three years. the reality is the american public gets it, they see through this nonsense, they are sick of it as i am and they should be. if it's going on here in america in 2019, we should all be ashamed of ourselves that they are trying to overthrow a duly elected president because they didn't get the results they wanted and they want to promote their socialist leftist policies and that's t the only thing that matters, that's disgusting. if this was going on in a banana republic, we would be outraged, it's going on here in america right now. >> sean: don, jr., we wish you the best. send my love to all of my friends in birmingham -- they have some of the best barbecue, you got to stop at one of the places. good luck on your book tour.

when we comeon back, rush limbaugh -- we didn't get to it last night, wait till you get his take on this impeachment witch hunt, that is next, stay with us. ♪ when we started our business

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go.

our costs for shipping we cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free.

>> on his radio show earlier today america's anchorman last of the democrats impeachment madness exposing it for what it really is. take a look. >> this is a big deal, folks. they are attempting to overturn a duly constituted legal election. this is not just politics as usual. this is a direct assault on the constitution. it is a direct assault on the

american voter. by a bunch of people who don't want to have to put up with wha voters do or think. you elect the wrong person, and they're going to try to take your choice away from you. and they are going to try to destroy the people you vote for as a means of destroying you an dispiriting you. >> there is a few w of us. the country needs you in 362 days. veterans day is coming up, and that's why i am spreading the word about america corporate partners pure their matching ou veterans with more executives i the special mentorship program to help our vets gain access to everyo industry as they transition from the military to the civilian workforce. help them if you can. that is all the time we have left this evening.

we will never be the rage hate psychotic media mob, we will always seek the truth. something the mob won't do. the good news is, let not your hearts be troubled, laura ingraham is up next. 362 days, laura. i hope we shock the world again. >> laura: i can tell you, it seems like it was just yesterday when you and i were on the air the night before the election last time around, can you believe that was three years ago? >> sean: can i give you credit? c there were a lot of people, you were there, newt gingrich were there, i was there, there were a few people that started hedging their bets and not showing up anymore, they didn't want to take ar risk and go out on a lb like we do every day. just saying. fill in the gaps. >> laura: that was fun, another great show, thank you so much -- great to see you. i'm laura ingraham, this is "the ingraham angle" from washington tonight. iwhy is the media lying about