>> the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group think. good night from washington, the city in the grip of insanity. sean hannity take it from here. >> sean: the grip of insanity in new york not much better than your swamp. does everybody know tucker put on a show, what was it called again, it is on youtube. >> tucker: "days of our lives." i was on that sitcom for a decade before i got into cable news. they went all out there and i can't wait to see. welcome to >> hannity: . a great day for the united states for the contrary, the president, lousy day for the corrupt do nothing for three years radical extreme socialist democrats and they were top allies. known as the media mob. now if you thought robert mueller's pathetic testimony come infusion -- fusion gps, what we saw today was even more pathetic, more

desperate and actually worse. matter of fact, at two-point rephrase, a total schiff show if you know what i mean. capitol hill and the democrats everywhere have reason to be worried tonight. it was such a disaster. it actually brought in therapy dogs, not making this up. they defended on capitol hill presumably to help democrats cope with their emotions. believe it or not, the circus, this was supposed to be there big, big day. this was it. they brought in their cherry picked witnesses, they were exciting kick off, their best shot to take this president down. get the president behind them. store witnesses, compelling evidence, none of that happening. the exact opposite happened. now, we heard from two kind of self-important, uncompelling, welcome assuming more important democrats. they have no first-hand information whatsoever and what i mean none, i mean zero, not

one of them ever talk to the president nor anyone near the president when got tons of conjecture. oh, hearsay upon hearsay. my cousins uncles sons daughters grandpa father told me. a lot of opinion, clear political bias, two individuals who seem to care more about ukraine's first policies than america's first policies. that was a little shocking from the democrats today. and despite all of the antipsychotic rage trump hearsay, a total lack of evidence of any wrongdoing. we did come from those some important facts, fax number one over the course of multiple meetings with american officials, the president zelensky never at one time never indicated usa was linked to an investigation into biden and barisma holdings. there was no linkage, none, just the opposite. three meetings after, we have the transcript with the new

president and president trump. president zelensky thought it was a great call. said repeatedly, never felt any pressure at all from anyone to do anything. fact number two, president zelensky never announced an investigation into barisma or the bidens. now with a congenital liar, adam schiff compromised corrupt character that he is, he was saying the aide was held up until the new president did this. he never did it. and three, the aide was dispensed to ukraine unconditionally, ouch. and four, zelensky repeatedly delayed that within a shaped matter or form. let make this for the corrupt idiots known as the democrats and the allies in the media mob. this just makes you look really dumb, bad, stupid and shallow and shows how corrupt you all are. and just hours ago, congressman jim jordan of ohio totally exposed the cham hearing entered a star witness.

take a look at this. >> ambassador taylor told aunt that i told mr. morse and i conveyed to mr. yarmo september 1st, 2019 with the -- the meeting. we have six people with four concert -- conversations in one sentence and you told me this is where you got your clear understanding. even though you had three opportunities with the president zelensky to tell you, you know what we will do these investigations to get the eta. i didn't tell you three different times. member makes an announcement, never tweets about it or does a cnn interview. you did listen on president trump's call, president sullins please call? you never talked with mulvaney. you never met the president and three meetings that didn't come up. >> two of those they never heard of it as far as i know. you are there star witness. you are their first witness. you are the guy, based on this. i mean, i've seen them i've seen church prayer chains easier to understand than this.

and rickles mr. morrison told mr. morse and that i conveyed this message -- this all happens, by the way, this all happens by the way in warsaw. vice president pence meets with president zelensky and guess what, they didn't talk about any linkage either. >> sean: and everything on the corrupt compromise, coward congenital liar's faith, how do i stop this? taylor relied on hearsay and conjecture at least 17 times during the testimony. that is not evidence. you talk about playing a game of telephone. that is the compelling evidence that they provided that duly elected president of the united states of america deserves to be impeached that we are going to overturn the will of the people? really? by the way the ukrainian president told ambassador taylor, he was happy, told the next day he was happy that the call with president trump. the same phone called the

democrats claim, remember them telling us it will be filled with smoking gun quid pro quo's and extortion. take a look. >> and president zelensky, did he raise concerns of his views of the call? >> he said, right, so mrs. holland, were in his office, and we asked him come i think the call, the call was fine. i was happy with the cold. >> sean: i was happy with the call. maybe that is why today anti-trump store witnesses were not able to identify his single impeachable offense. this was a pretty special moment, let's take a look. >> so in this impeachment hearing today where we impeach president for treason or bribery or other high crimes, where is the impeachable offense and that call? are either to assert there was

an impeachable offense and that call? shouted out. anyone? >> sean: crickets. nothing there. no quid pro quo. whatsoever which is exactly what u.s. ambassador to the ee you gordon sondland told ambassador taylor over the phone. president, he said he used the term, president was very, very clear and i will read it to you, i want no quid pro quo. this is the guy that they were referring that they heard the conversations with. the president said i want no print quote pro. watch this. speak with a text message, sondlond says to call him after you wrote that. did you infect call him? i did. >> what did he say to you? >> he said that i had, that i was wrong about president trump's intent. that there was no quid pro quo.

>> sean: steve castro with the house republicans who you signed that clip to defend and a fantastic job. he was coming through the b.s. a lot of moments like that black artist to the truth. many republican stars on the intel committee. great day for jim jordan, devin nunes, ratcliffe, mark meadows outside of the hearing to be down at the media they deserve. democrats knelt look stupid and the mob and the media grabbing at straws. a nightmare for nancy pelosi. she's not even having a press conference with the compromised schiff. watching these people tried to something together out of nothing is like a thing of beauty. today's hearing was so terrible for the democrats, one democratic congressman to actually tried to argue, hearsay, evidence is better than direct evidence. you can't make this stop. take a look. >> the american public needs to re-reminded congress people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have

routinely allowed and created needed exceptions to hearsay. hearsay can be much better evidence than direct. >> and of those exceptions were in this testimony. >> sean: yeah, it is usually not admissible either, but hearsay is better than direct testimony. what that guy told this guy that told that guy that told that guy that told you is better? pretty embarrassing. and clearly, there is no there there and this circus, this sham, this charade on his way to the sake of the country should be shut down immediately. unless, of course we hear from sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle joe and his zero experience on hunter. was they were, we do have a real quid pro quo, a real shakedown and what appears to be and we should investigate real bribery and real extortion. we also need to hear testimony from the compromised corrupt coward, congenital liar out of schiff, his staff and the so-called whistle-blower come in on, hearsay whistle-blower where

in reality anti-trump deep state bureaucrats that spreads gossip and leaked. he is nowhere to be found. for a well i thought the outcome of this inquiry was a foregone conclusion. actually thought "the new york post" captured pretty well, titled guilty, now time for the trial. but after today, i don't know. the main democrats out there someone trump in 2016 may be getting a little nervous about all of this. maybe you don't want to lose touch with reality. coming up, we will show you the congenital liar and compromise witness in this case, back with us, adam schiff has been caught in another light today. in today's hearing. and we also have more highlights from the circus joining us now with reaction majority with steve's scaleese and mike turner, he also was when today's hearing, congressman scaleese, t with you, you know i have to be

honest, i was a little shocked. probably somebody that will say something that maybe somebody can run with but i did not see anything. >> no, sean this is a bad day for adam schiff and this whole charade, this witch hunt they have been promoting. for months now, and if you look and i know you showed these clips, john radcliffe actually asked the two store witnesses, these were the first witnesses that they brought out to make their case. he said can either of you name an impeachable offense? dead silence like you saw. and so many other cases, jim jordan showed the secondhand, thirdhand, fourth hand of bureaucrats who i'm sure they have studied ukraine policy for decades, but the bottom line, there is on -- only one policy for the united states of america and that his commander in chief donald trump. so ultimately their job is to carry that out but instead they are trying to block its foreign policy which has been successful. it's selling javelin missiles so you retain -- ukrainian can

stand up something joe biden and barack obama wouldn't do. so russia, help ukraine when biden and obama wouldn't. >> sean: that is the point. they did nothing and they still got the aid. congressman turner, you were there. there are, there is not a fair process and i don't even want to make it about process but about substance. we have a president that took us a note to faithfully execute the laws. everybody said they cared about election interference. we know ukrainian court decision, yeah, they pointed out ukraine did interfere in the 2016 elections on behalf of hillary clinton. but politico, january 11, 2017 said dnc operative went to ukrainian embassy in washington and the outcome of colluding with ukraine to dig up dirt on then candidate donald trump and associates for the purpose of influence 2016 election. i noticed none of that came out today, why? >> ambassador taylor, and mr. kent had no knowledge of those things although they

considered that to be a relative issue with respect to interfering in the united states issues. apparently only the things they are hearing and that is hearsay with respect to the trump administration. and one thing, unbelievable about this, here are two men never met the president of the united states, never spoke to the president of the united states and never spoke to the president of the united states about ukraine but store witnesses about what the president things, what his intent was. they have no knowledge of these things and everything that they told that they had heard from others even ambassador taylor i'm just here to tell you what i heard. certainly not to tell about facts. >> sean: and look, for example, they are, they are talking about conversations with european union ambassador who said, the president clearly stated, quid pro quo and testified he did not have a quid pro quo. violence dominic zelensky said there was no pressure. and so there is no link approved by anybody and they know nothing

first-hand so why were they sitting in the room? >> i think it is a mess that they have. it should be talking to any thinking democrats in the house that here is their best case, their best foot forward. two people that know nothing directly and never met the president of the united states. even the bomb show, the new phone call was investor taylor saying i was just told three months after the fact that i had aide who claims to have heard, on the phone who claims to believe it was the president and believes he heard what the president was saying. so he was going to report that to us. now, all of this is here to say no court would allow this information and certainly should be rejected to the american public. >> sean: congressman, 20 seconds. and it democrats who are talking to that are a little bit nervous about this thinking this is blowing up in their face just like russia which can't? >> there are a lot of swing districts where he is elected and he will get reelected next year because he's focused on the things families care about,

getting the economy back on track, here are wages of people's paychecks and they want to impeach the president not because they didn't do anything wrong. the star witnesses couldn't do a single thing but because they disagree with the results of the election. that is not what you have impeachment. it is on full display today. >> sean: congressman scalise, congressman turner, busy working today, disaster for democrats. she could see it coming a mile away. the left blinded by their rage psychotic hate of trump and they have for three years. they've done nothing for the american people. they don't care about facts, obviously justice matters not. and they don't care about hunter or joe, quid pro quo joe and every second of every single hour of every 24-hour day, they just hate the president. at the beginning of the hearing today, the ranking member devin nunes, he sums it up pretty perfectly. take a look. >> supposed to take these people at face value when they trot out a new batch of allegations. but anyone familiar with the democrats scorched earth war

against president trump would not be surprised to see all the typical signs that this is a carefully orchestrated media smear campaign. the witnesses deemed suitable for television for the democrats were put through a closed-door audition process and a cult like atmosphere in the basement of the capital. let's recall, for years they accuse trump campaign colluding with russia when them themselves colluding with russia by spreading for steele dossier which relied on russian sources. an outcome of they accuse president trump of treason in ukraine when them themselves culpable. the democrats cooperated ukrainian russia meddling and they defend hunter biden securing of lavishly paid position with a corrupt ukrainian company. all the while, his father served as vice president. >> sean: by the way, when the hoax came up empty, they switch

to plan c, d, e. and insurance policies same schiff different day. the past several months, the cowardly schiff repeatedly caught lying at the transcript the phone call between the president and the president of ukraine had numerous quid pro quo's. he made up a fabricated transcript because the president released the real one. he said we have not spoken directly with the whistle-blower, but we would like to. all blatant lies and the last one, this is a real doozy because "the washington post" gave them for solid pinocchio's after finding out that schiff staff in close communication with the fake whistle-blower from the beginning. in fact schiff 'to get a lawyer but the inspector general and even the compromised corrupt congenital layer schiff admitted he should have been more clear about his contact with the whistle-blower. schiff is a fact witness and why he's compromised as he presides over this case has judged, jury and executioner. no due process, no fairness, no

justice and yeah he did audition and cherry picked the people that he wanted to bring in today. the national disgrace, and abuse of their power. maybe that is why schiff change the story once again. now schiff is claiming he doesn't know the whistle-blower was. which contradicted what he said the second time which contradicted the first time. take a look. >> just asked a clarifying question do you anticipate when we might vote on the ability to have the whistle-blower in front of us. something that you will come of the 435 members of congress, you are the only member who knows who that individual is and your staff's family member of congress who has two talk with the individual. we would like an opportunity and when might that happen in the proceeding today? >> first, that is a false statement. i do not know the identity of the whistle-blower. and i am determined to protect his identity. >> sean: same schiff different day. pelosi should have known better to give reins t to the congenitl liar. he's been lying three years to

the american people. a future trust adam schiff he is a liar. they will reap what they sow. the republican minority leader in the house kevin mccarthy. by the way, good for you for bringing in jim jordan, great call, he had a great day. i thought the republicans had a great day all the way around. this is actually worse than i thought. i mean, it was so bad, it is all hearsay. there is no first hand in the evidence of congressman. >> you have to understand the viewers for the very first time got to see what the democrats have been working on for the last three years come impeachment. they got home court advantage. they changed the intel committee to the impeachment committee. they got to pick the witnesses where they wouldn't pick any republican witnesses. you know what else they got to do? change the process where they controlled it all. at the end of the day, it was clear all hearsay, no witnesses even know the president or heard from the president and they

continued to change what they are going after. and you are correct. adam schiff started the hearing just like he started in until to the american public for the last three years by lying. this is what we have been looking at this whole time. >> sean: in a democrats talking to you privately saying, a bad idea? >> i've had a couple. i had a democrat come to me to date telling me he should question whether he should stay a democrat or reregister. this is not the party that i know. these individuals and the direction they are going is totally wrong. >> sean: what is next? i don't see a single republican going along with this. i thought it was 100% there but we deftly have to vote for impeachment but i'm not so sure anymore. it was that bad of the day for them. any indication some democrats will say, no, i'm not going down with your stupid battleship ear? >> who have 31 democrats that currently sit in seats that president trump carried. i think if they listen to their

voters, they probably would not vote for this. remember what nancy pelosi said in march to the speaker of the house. to go through impeachment is so divisive, it would have to be so compelling, overwhelming and bipartisan to move forward if you're the only bipartisan vote we have in the house is to stop the impeachment inquiry. remember every republican as two democrats join with us. there was nothing compelling, nothing overwhelming we find it is all hearsay. the star witnesses cannot name one thing that the president should be impeached over. >> sean: all right, congressman think of rubbing with us. reaction to fox contributor, investigative reporter sara carter author of a author revenue best seller witch hunt, gregg jarrett. sarah, we did get some news the inspector general is in fact now going to people that are mentioned in the report, which is the final, final step before the release of that report. so will we get it monday or tuesday or wednesday? >> i absolutely think that is

possible. i don't want to say 100%. >> sean: we have been burned because we have been told over and over again? >> that's why. >> exactly since may. what we do know he has wrapping it up. these are the final stages. we do know there is going to be a lot of information in this report. as i said before, a lot of the information the classified documents that the president actually turned over to attorney general william barr that borowitz is using in his report will more than likely be declassified because this is not going to be highly redacted. so it's going to be interesting to see what happens, yes. >> sean: greg i know you are the law year. i don't know i'm just a talk show host, what do i know? not a lot. but i never knew that hearsay was more compelling than direct evidence. i never knew that until today. >> quit, we get to the award for saying something that is totally ridiculous.

look, single hearsay is unreliable. double hearsay is a joke. triple hearsay is a farce. quadruple hearsay is slapstick and buffoonery. and yet, that is what we heard today. george kent said he believed there was a quid pro quo because he heard it from taylor who heard it from tim morrison who heard it from gordon sondland. where did sondlond get it? oh, he presumed there was a quid pro quo, even though the president told him directly, i want nothing. there is no quid pro quo. >> sean: let me jump in. he said multiple times let the president clearly stated i want no prick quote pro. that is where they are getting their hearsay from. >> you know, cross examination is the engine of truth. we learned today why. jordan and ratcliff and turner eviscerated this cattery class of diplomats whose only currency seems to be innuendo room or speculation based on multiple

hearsay. that is not evidence, it is junk. hats off to congressman turner who said "you guys would not even be allowed in a court of law." he's right. >> sean: both of you, thank you for being with us. we appreciate it. we have a busy show. it doesn't get any better than this, actually. senator lindsey graham, by the way i didn't like the notes from mitch mcconnell. we both get into that. donald trump jr., hilarious. wait until you hear these remarks. that is all coming up, this addition of >> hannity: . thank you for being with us. ♪

♪ >> sean: today, president trump reacted to the democrats embarrassing flop on impeachment and the spectacle.

the press conference with the president of turkey, take a look. >> you are talking about, is that what you are talking about, i hear it is a joke. i haven't watch for one minute because i've been with the president which is much more important, this is a sham. and it should not be allowed. it was a situation caused by people that should not have allowed it to happen. i want to find out who is the whistle-blower. because the whistle-blower gave out incorrect information including my call with the president of ukraine which was a perfect hole. >> sean: here with reaction senate judiciary lindsey graham. senator, i'm a little concerned about two fellow colleagues. john cornyn of texas and mitch mcconnell, your leader, saying we've got to have not 51 votes to dismiss this sham process and then mcconnell kind of seemingly backing him

up, wait a minute. if there is no due process, afforded bill clinton his attorneys, the democrats, they are going to take this up anyway in the senate? >> well, here is the trail is in the senate. let's say they get 218 voters. here is what i promised the country. we are not going to try the president of the united states based on hearsay. in the resolution setting up a trial and the senate come i will make sure that hearsay cannot be the basis of impeachment allegation. if you invoke the hearsay rule, what would be left? >> sean: i mean, it is a great question. i was surprised, especially considering you said it was doa without the whistle-blower, without due process. we have none of that. >> can i build this? a trial in the senate to me means should not legitimize what is going on in the house.

no american is denied the right to call witnesses on their behalf except donald trump. no american is accused of wrongdoing anonymously except donald trump. that they are doing in the house has a danger to the presidency itself. so when a trial in the senate needs to make sure that you you can't impeach a president based on hearsay because that is a danger to the presidency itself. secondly, in a trial in the senate must expose a whistle-blower so the president can confront his accuser. i will not accept a trial in the senate until i know who the whistle-blower is. >> sean: so, a lot of the hearsay hearsay, hearsay, hearsay come up for a way hearsay way hearsay went back to the testimony in private as they were auditioning and cherry picking the witnesses, but they keep referring to the ambassador sondlond who said the president clearly stated i want no quid pro quo.

we know volker testified he did not receive indication of any quid pro quo. president zelensky, there was zero pressure. three meetings with these guys and the president of ukraine, president zelensky, he never did anything, and he still got that aid. i'm like, so where is the squid and the pro and the quote. help me out. >> they got the money and nobody investigated joe biden and the ukrainian government. so there is no there there. but let's go back to the idea what kind of trail would you conduct? if you excluded hearsay like every other court in the land, there is nothing they are. and if you allow the president to approach his accuser come you have to call the whistle-blower. here is a question i have about the whistle-blower. it was the whistle-blower connected to joe biden in any way? did the whistle-blower give

himself or get himself involved? here is the point i'm trying to make. here is the point. did the whistle-blower engage in an effort to get the ukrainian president to weigh in and stop the investigation of this gas company? was there a connection between the whistle-blower and biden's effort to coal ukraine? that is very important to me. we cannot legitimize an impeachment based on an anonymous source if you do that, no president will be allowed to survive. and the fellow members of congress, how would you like to be in the shoes of donald trump? you are accused of something based on a whistle-blower who is anonymous and you cannot call witnesses on your behalf. >> sean: now come i have found evidence of a quid pro quo. quid pro quo joke. because he says to ukraine in a shakedown, "you are not getting the billion dollars unless you

fire that prosecutor" fire the prosecutor and you get the billion. don't fire the prosecutor, you don't get the billion. who is the prosecutor? the prosecutor is the guy he was told is investigating his son, zero experience hunter being paid millions and millions of dollars. now, that seems like a quid and a pro and a quote. we actually found one. why is there a zero interest these people that claim this is so bad the quid pro quo is so bad, claimed election interference is bad. we have evidence of both here except not on their side. >> this is not about getting to the truth. it is about destroying the president of the united states. adam schiff is not an independent person here. mueller and everybody else involved in impeachment in the past were outside of politics. here is my point. did the president of ukraine, the previous president did he receive a call from joe biden and was that call related to the

investigation of the gas company that hunter biden was sitting on? i will write it if nobody else will a letter to the president of ukraine. did you ever get a call from joe biden calling off the dogs regarding this gas company? >> sean: the compromised congenital liar schiff, call members of the staff about the contact of the whistle-blower. will the whistle-blower be forced to testify in the senate? what about hunter and joe biden? will all of that happen? >> great question. as a matter of a voter side come i will not call the house. but if you impeach the president of the united states come i want to find out, if, in fact, schiff and his staff met with a whistle-blower. if you said today is that true. if there is a trial in this and that, one of the witnesses will be adam schiff because if he did, in fact meet with the whistle-blower and coach the guy up, that is relevant to the impeachment query itself.

>> sean: senator, thank you for being with us. we appreciate your hard work on all of this. don jr. a big announcement from him in a minute. first with reaction to the circus. the author of the number one "new york times" best seller, "on freedom of the press" the time of the news channel sunday, 8:00. the number one show, the time slot, i think you doubled your lead which is tv, the great one, mark levin. i know you have a lot to say, sir. >> we are here to protect the country. i appreciate you inviting me on, sean because you have an intelligent audience and i want to go through these things. by the way, these two guys testifying i could not tell if they were doing a job interview talking about their great grandfather, his wife or they were homeless guys. basically, they didn't have a hell of a lot. they are to costar witnesses and adam schiff for such incompetent left wing boom. let's go through the law again. i want the american people to

understand something because you do not get it from the reporters were the analysts or anybody. i will say this slowly so george conway can understand. the law, the so-called whistle-blowers not a whistle-blower under federal law. the so-called whistle-blowers not covered by the whistle-blower statute. the so-called whistle-blower does not receive anonymity here during an impeachment process. you can get anonymity from inspector general and the intelligence community, but beyond that and outside of that, he gets no anonymity under federal law. the president is not covered by the whistle-blower statute under federal law! the president's phone call is not covered by the whistle-blower under the statute, under federal law! so what we have here is a

massive cover-up, massive cover-up of a democrat cia operative which ties to brandon puritt ties to biden, it ties to nse former staffers on schiff staff. of course they will protect this guide. of course the media will protect this guy because the whole house of cards comes down if he becomes the blue dress if you we dress in this case, the clinton matter. next, the constitution. i hear these legal analyst and they say, look, it is whatever the hell says it is when it comes to impeachment. who do they quote? the great jurist and constitutional scholar jared -- gerald ford -- gerald ford. they have to read the constitutional convention. they actually ought to study it and they ought to look at the language and the constitution. does the constitution say impeachment is whatever the house of representatives says it is? note! treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors. the democrats think they have found something, bribery. they talk about bribery.

even as legal analyst talking about bribery's. the legal analyst former prosecutors, judges have no knowledge of the constitution, no experience, no dealings with impeachments as i have. let's walk through it quickly. the framers created a higher standard, a hired standard of. they had initially proposed a lower standard for impeachment. so they come up with treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors. these are meaningless. they looked at what took place in the parliament, a name a name that meant english common law and they did not write hey it's whatever the house of representatives says. that is not what your constitution says. what about bribery, what did they say about bribery, i dusted off my medicine notes from the constitutional convention and it would be nice if a journalist or a analyst would do that from time to time. by bribery they did not mean that will let you hear on tv today. by bribery, but they meant, they didn't want a president to be bribed and this is the example

they used by a foreign government, by a foreign government. and then they buy his loyalty. that has nothing to do with what is going on today. you know eric swalwell, who is not well? swell well, bribery. let's call it extortion. let's call conscious of mine. let's call it stupid because you don't even know what you are talking about. and the president is not required to give funds to a corrupt foreign government! so we have legal analyst going on, you know, once the house and senate passed this, he must give up the funds. there is another statute that congress passed and the president assigned. the president has to make sure this money is spent wisely. what about the biden's? let's put all this aside. joe biden wants to be president of the united states. we have a biden crime family now. this kid, hunter, romania, china, ukraine, just because innocent cooper said you know what, he's innocent. okay, we won't ask any

questions. his brother has his hand in the till. they all have their hands into table. we the people have a right to know what the bidens have been up to before and if he is nominated for the democratic party for the president of the united states. let me keep going as quickly as i can. you hear this phrase? anything of value of the president of the united states. intervening in a potential american election with ukraine in exchange for something? that is a quid pro quo. what is a thing of value? the office of legal counsel. the premier constitutional office and your federal government over the department of justice which also has a lot of civil servants there who serve a long time just like the genius who testified today the two homeless guys. what did they say? it's not a crime. it's not bribery but they kept repeating it like it is. who sets foreign policy in this country? two guys you have never heard of before? it is interesting to hear their language. this guy the older gentleman i

can't remember, what was his name? taylor, a regular taylor, going behind closed doors. powell, let me tell you something, donald trump sets foreign policy, not you and not all the goons over there at the state department. he sets foreign policy. you know what? you are the irregular channel. that guy you were sitting next to, whatever, he's the irregular channel. you guys were pushing policies contrary to the president of the united states. article two, the president of the united states is the executive branch. there is no the state department and the constitution of the united states. there is no secretary of state and one other thing, it is irregular channel. have you ever heard of harry hopkins? i want you to google, harry hopkins, harry hopkins was a confident and best friend of franklin roosevelt. you liberal democrats out there, the media, you let the fbi. everything he did come in sick the irs on the opponent's sick

irs on the media. grounded up with the americans, kept offshore, you love your fdr. would you impeach him by the way? of course not, you would celebrate him. with that said, harry hopkins and every president has had one of this. harry hopkins lived in the white house. harry hopkins conducted for the president and he went around the state department come infuriated the secretary of state, secretary of treasurer, secretary of commerce and conduct foreign policy. talk to stalin, churchill and he would do all these other things. so i have a suggestion for adam schiff. why don't we retroactively, cautiously befriend franklin roosevelt? that would be justice, ladies and gentlemen. yes, that is it. >> sean: and then i released the oh, joe biden/ukraine transcripts. let's see, the flexibility of the tape so the vladimir putin transcripts. the obama/iran transcripts come a lot of transcripts to read.

great wind from a great job. new timeslots come every sunday night, new slot at 8:00 p.m. eastern. when we come back, actually they had therapy dogs on capitol hill. i hope people to cope with the stress of impeachment progress. and also he will weigh in on the crazy people showing up on his book tour, lawrence jones on the streets of washington today speaking with people outside of the capital and rush limbaugh his take on the madness of today straight-ahead.

♪ >> sean: all right come a circus, the impeachment saga consumes. and the capital, the less people in the street. if they think the president should be impeached and for what crime? spoiler alert, no one who

thought he should be impeached can name and offense. shocking. take a look. >> the impeachment hearings that are going on today, where do you stand on it? >> i think that the hearing has to happen, and that there is probably some good reasons to impeach. >> i love what he is doing for the country. the democrats have been trying to impeach him since the day he took office. >> he has not committed any impeachable offenses at all. speak with this whole impeachment is a waste of taxpayer dollars. >> if you can name the high crime or the misdemeanor that the president has committed, what would you say he has done? >> i think he has not limited to both the ukraine, holding them hostage. >> abuse of power periods >> so i have to ask you the question. if that is the standard to impeach the president on that offense when joe biden said,

fire the prosecutor. if you do not fire the prosecutor, you will not get a aid. do they post commit height crime? should they both be impeached? i think trump as president has a higher standard. >> then the vice president. >> than the vice president. >> i don't really know, but i think that is besides the point. >> the optics there are not good but i don't think joe biden did anything wrong. >> sean: meanwhile therapy dogs were cited on capitol hill today to help people feeling triggered by the public impeachment hearings. you really can't make this stuff up. here with reaction, the author of and we just found out tonight, debuting as the number one "new york times" best sell best seller, "triggered how the left prides on hate" the vice president of the trump organization donald trump jr. all right, so your dad one

best seller -- sell or come anyone else in the family with number one bestsellers? >> i don't know. my dad probably had a couple so i have to right a few more to catch up. i'm pretty happy where we are right now, thank you. >> sean: before we get to the madness you have experienced on the road which is highly entertaining to watch from a distance and i mean that from a distance. what was your reaction to everything today? i thought it was a schiff show. >> it really was. i've never seen anything more ridiculous. you can see exactly what america voted against in 2016. career, government, bureaucrats doing their thing. there is no fact base. everything was hearsay. i heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend. this is a joke. this is their lead, sean? and then i heard the democrats and i heard how bad or nonexistent they were cases. well, hearsay is oftentimes much

better than regular evidence. i'm saying to that guy say that with a straight face in the halls of congress? hearsay? you mean like the telephone game we learned about in kindergarten is better than actual direct evidence? it is better to heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend than to have heard it with your own ears? that is the level of insanity you see from these bureaucrats who have taken anti-trump position they are being led, badgered, bullied by schiff to get them what they want because the mainstream media will carry their water and function as a marketing wing of the democratic party. they will say whatever it is just to get out of there. went to republicans questioning, adam schiff changes the rules, changes the goalpost and pretends they cannot ask that question anymore. it is never-ending. i mean, it is a comedy at this point. it is so ridiculous. it is exactly what the american people have needed to see. if you did not buy at the first time come if you didn't buy it the second time with all the

hoaxes, russian version one, two, and the collusion on since we heard the gospel, fact for three years. you will believe at this time, sean because this time it's different. give me a break. it is insanity. >> sean: so you get to the re-visuals today, the president or to want to turkey come up very important stuff with your dad. that is happening at the same time for the schiff show is going on and i'm thinking, you have the president record on the dash unemployment since 1969 and record low unemployment for every demographic. and then i think okay, name one thing democrats have done. >> you can't. >> sean: to be more safe and secure, create jobs and be more prosperous? i cannot think of one thing, not one person watching, not one person watching can name one thing that the democrats have done in the year that they have had the house. not wanting to make a safer, not

one thing to move us forward. the usmca, sean, the reek negotiation of nafta, the thing that everyone said would never e able to renegotiate is, my father did it. he got it done because he is a negotiator unlike all of these clowns in congress who are just bureaucrats. he renegotiated with canada, mexico. they are in agreement and it has been sitting on nancy pelosi's desk for nine months. it would create 900,000 jobs for american. bring the jobs and the dreams that we have done nothing but export, bring that back so americans can live it. it would also give trump a win let's not vote on it. you know it would pass with flying colors with bipartisan support. she won't bring it up because she wants to make sure that trump doesn't get any additional credit despite all of the things he's done for america. that is the level of hatred you see from the left. they are not looking to govern. they are not looking to do anything. they are looking to try to resist because they know they can't beat trump in the polls.

they will try to impeach. it will not work in the long run and the american people see through it, sean, they are sick of this garbage. >> sean: quick last ten seconds did your dad hear about you being number one, debuting on "the new york times" list? >> he did and he was as surprised as i was because he heard about conservative writers getting blocked from a band or being there so i will give them this. they did the right thing for once. >> sean: i was number one, got there. good luck, congratulations, and when we come back, rush limbaugh fired up, i mean, really funny comments about the sham on capitol hill. that is next. b b ♪

>> sean: today rush limbaugh went off on the deep state as they were embarrassing themselves. take a look. >> it has been flat out boring, and as a television show. you may say, rash, that's not the way to look at this, but it is. it's been promoted as a blockbuster hour, blockbuster opening and, i'm telling you folks, that's not what this has been.

it's opening up for the american people to see exactly what this deep state is. whatever you want to call it. we have here a bunch of professional nerds who wear their bow ties and they have their proper diplo speak and, what are they upset about? they are upset that donald trump use irregular channels on foreign policy. there hasn't been a single crime announced. there hasn't been a single impeachable offense named. there hasn't been anything but a bunch of self-important, narcissistic, we round the world kind of guys really kicke tickef that they were ignored. >> sean: yikes. and all true, too. did these guys really think that they are here hearsay, i heard from this person, this person, was relevant? a little shocking. period anti-climatic for sure.

that's all they time we have left this evening. we will always seek the truth, we will never be the media mob. hannity.com for more. but let not your heart be troubled because laura ingraham looked taking it away. >> laura: this is "the ingraham angle" from new york city. the democrats really want to impeach based off what we heard today. congress and many chris stewart and mark meadows were both at the hearing today and are here exclusively to cut through all the noise. also tonight president trump's former attorney general says democrats impeachment push is irreparably damaging our republic. jeff sessions is here with his exclusive reaction. plus raymond arroyo will break down the most hilarious moments. he missed all of this stuff by the way. from faulty video cues to a certain here implement in one